Вопросы для повторения и обсуждения

1. Расскажите своими словами, как вы понимаете различия между следующими тер­минами: профессиографический анализ, оценка затратности работы, описание работы, психограмма, классификация профессий.

2. Придумайте десять вопросов, которые вы бы задали своему преподавателю, если бы собирались проинтервьюировать его с целью профессиографического анализа.

3. Составьте описание «работы» студента вашего курса, согласующееся с нормами, указанными в этой главе.

4. Опишите три основных источника ошибок при профессиографическом анализе и дайте по одному примеру для каждого,-Какой из приведенных в этой главе базо­вых методов уменьшения числа ошибок подходит в наибольшей степени для каж­дого случая?

5. Приведите убедительный пример для одного из следующих высказываний:

а. Женщины зарабатывают меньше, чем мужчины, потому что проводят дома больше времени (то есть чаще устраиваются на работу и оставляют ее).

б. Женщины проводят дома больше времени, чем мужчины, потому что зараба-тывают меньше, чем мужчины.

Основные термины

анализ организации (organizational analysis)

источники информации о работе (job information sources)

компенсируемые факторы работы (compensable job factors)

описание работы (job description)

оценка затратности работы (job evaluation)

профессиографический анализ (job analysis)

профессиографический анализ на основе заданий (task-basedjob analysis)

профессиографический анализ на основе обязанностей (duty-basedjob analysis)

профессиографический анализ на основе характеристик (dimension-basedjob analysis) психограмма = профессиональные требования к личности (job specification)

«Словарь наименований профессий» (Dictionary of Occupational Titles)

сопоставимая стоимость (comparable, worth)

Литература.

Albemarle Paper Company v. Moody. (1975). 422 U.S. 405.

Bcrkowitz, L., Fraser, C, Treasure, F. P., & Cochran. S. (1987). Pay equity, job gratifications, and comparisons in pay satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 544-551.

Bcrstein,A.(1988,May 2)The new federalism hasn't meant less government. Business Wee);, p. 110.

Bowen, D. E., Ledford, G. E., Jr., & Nathan. B. R. (1991). Hiring for the organization, not the job. Academy of Management Executive. 5. 35-50.

Bruce,D,&VanPelt,(1989) Memories of a bicycle tour. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 3.137.

Clifford, J. P. (1996). Manage work better to better manage human resources: A comparative study of two approaches to job analysis. Public Personnel Management, 25, 89-102^

Collins, J. M., & Muchinsky, P. M. (1993). An assessment of the construct validity of three job evaluation methods: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 895-904.

Cornelius, E. Т., & Hakel, M. D. (1978). A study to develop an improved enlisted performance eva­luation system/or the U.S. Coast Guard. Washington, DC: Department of Transportation. LJSCG.

Cunningham, J. W., & Ballemine, R. D. (1982). The genera! work inventory. Raleigh. NC: Authors.

Davis, K. R., & Sauser, W. 1. (1993). A comparison of factor weighting methods in job evaluation: Implications for compensation systems. Public Personnel Management, 22, 91-106.

Dawis, R. V., Lofquist, L. II., & Weiss, D.J. (1968). A theory of work adjustment (A revision). Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation; XXIII. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

Employment and Training Administration. 1.1977). Dictionary of occupational titles (4th ed.).

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1978). Guidelines on employment testing procedures. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

Fine, S. A. (1974). Functional job analysis: An approach to a technology for manpower planning. Personnel Journal, 53,813-818.

Flippo, E. B. (1971). Principles of personnel administration (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gatewood.R.D.,& Feild, H S.(1987).Human resource selection. New York:CBS College Publishing.

Geyer, P. D., Hice, J., Hawk, J., Boesc, R., & Brannon, Y. (1989). Reliabilities of ratings available from the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. Personnel Psychology, 42, 547-560.

Grant, P. C. (1988a). What use is ajob description? Personnel Journal, 67, 45-53.

Grant. R C. (1988b). Why job descriptions don't work. Personnel Journal, 67, 52-59.

HackmanJ. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1973). Development bf the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159-170.

Hahn, D. C, & Dipboye, R. L. (1988). Effects of training and information on the accuracy and reliability of job evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 146-153.

Harvey, R.J. (1990). Job analysis. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Vol. 2 (2nd ed). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Heneman, R. L., Greenberger, D.G., & Strasser, S. (1988). The relationship between pay-for-pcrformance perceptions and pay satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 41, 745-759.

Hoffmann, С. C, & Hoffmann, K. P. (1987). Docs comparable worth obscure the real issues? Perso­nnel Journal, 66, 83-95.

Hornsby, J. S., Smith, B. N., & Gupta, J.N. D. (1994). The impact of decision-making methodology on job evaluation outcomes: A look at three consensus approaches. Group and Organisation Management, 19,112-128.

Hubcr,V.L,Scybolt, P. M, &Venemon, K. (1992).The relationship between individual inputs, perceptions, and multidimensional pay satisfaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22,1356.

Kleiman,L.S., & Faley, R.H.(1985).The implications of professional and legal guidelines for court decisions involving criterion-related validity:A review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 38, 803.

Klinger,D.E.(1979) When the traditional job description is not enough. Personnel Journal,58,243

Landy, E. J., & Shankstcr, L.J. (1994). Personnel selection and placement. Annual Review of Psychology;45,261-296.

Lavvler, Е. E. (1994). From job-based to competency-based organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior 15, 3-15.

Levine, E. L., Ash, R. A., Hall, H., & Sistrunk, E (1983). Evaluation of job analysis methods by

experienced job analysts. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 339-348.

Madigan, R. M. (1985). Comparable worth judgments: A measurement properties analysis. Journal

of Applied Psychology, 70, 137-147.

Madigan, R. M., & Hoover, D.J, (1986). Effects of alternative job evaluation methods on decisions

involving pay equity. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 84-100.

Mahoncy,T. A. (1983). Approaches to the definition of comparable worth. Academy of Management Review, 8,14-22.

Markowitz, J.(1981).Four methods of job analysis. Training and Development Journal, 35,112-118.

McCormick,E.J.Jeanncret,P.R.,& Mecham, R.C.(1972).A study of job characteristics and job dimensions as based on the Position Analysis Questionnaire. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 347

McCulloch, M. C, & Francis, D.J. (1989). Analyzing the social content of jobs: Testing the social

scale of Functional Job Analysis. In T. W. Mitchell (Chair), Theory, instrumentation. applications, and consequences in recent job analysis research. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. New Orleans. Mecham, R. C. Unpublished manuscript.

Mintzbcrg, H. (1980). The nature of managerial work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Mount, M. K.., & Ellis, R. A. (1987). Investigation of bias in job evaluation ratings of comparable

worth study participants. Personnel Psychology, 40, 85-96.

Pfeffcr, J., & Langton, N. (1993). The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and

working collaboratively. Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science

Quarterly, 38,382-407.

Richman, W. L., & Quinones, M. A. (1996). Task frequency rating accuracy: The effect of task

engagement and experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8.1, 512-524.

Robinson, J. A., &r Swanson, K. L. (1990). Autobiographical memory: The next phase. Applied Cogni­tive Psychology, 4, 321-335.

Sape, G. R (1985). Coping with comparable worth. Harvard Business Review, 63, 145-152. Schmidt, F L., Hunter, J., & Pearlman, K. (1981). Task differences as moderators of aptitude test

validity in selection: A red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 166-185.

Schneier, C. (1976). Content validity: The necessity of a behavioral job description. The Personnel

Administrator 21, 38-44.

Smith, B. N., Benson, P G., &r HornsbyJ. S. (1990). The effects of job description content on job

evaluation judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 301-309.

Stammers, R.B.(1995).Factors limiting the development of task analysis. Ergonomics. 38. 588-594.

Tanncnbaum, R.J., & Rosenfeld, M. (1994). Job analysis for teacher competency testing: Identification of basic skills important for all entry-level teachers.

Tannenbaum, R.J., & Wesley,S.(1993).Agreement between committee-based and field-based job analyses: A study in the context oflicensurc testing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78,975-980.

Tornow, W W, &r Pinto,RR.(1976). The development of a managerial job taxonomy. A system for describing, classifying, and evaluating executive positions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61. 410.

Watford. L. (1996, March 25). Technology helps disabled enrich lives. Los Angeles Times, p. D3. Williams, M. L. (1995). Antecedents of employee benefit level satisfaction: A test of a modeY.JbUrnal of Management, 21,1097-1128.

Wilson,M.A.(1991).An expert system for abilities-oriented job analysis: Are computers equivalent

to paper-and-pencil methods? In R.J. Harvey (Chair), Measurement issues in job analysis: New'

approaches to old problems. Symposium presented at the annual conference of the Society for

Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis.

Wilson, M A., Harvey, R.J., & Macy, B. A. (1990). Repeating items to estimate the test-retest

reliability of task inventory ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 158-163.

Часть

IV