Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Economics of strategy 6th edition.pdf
Скачиваний:
441
Добавлен:
26.03.2016
Размер:
3.36 Mб
Скачать

24 Economics Primer: Basic Principles

The product is used in conjunction with another product that buyers have committed themselves to. For example, an owner of a copying machine is likely to be fairly insensitive to the price of toner, because the toner is an essential input in running the copier.

Brand-Level versus Industry-Level Elasticities

Students often mistakenly suppose that just because the demand for a product is inelastic, the demand facing each seller of that product is also inelastic. Consider, for example, gasoline. Many studies have documented that the demand for gasoline is price inelastic, with elasticities of around 0.10–0.20. This suggests that a general increase in the prices charged at all gas stations would only modestly affect overall gasoline demand. However, if only one gas station increases its price, the demand for that gas station would probably drop substantially because consumers would patronize other stations. Thus, while demand can be inelastic at the industry level, it can be highly elastic at the brand level.

Should a firm use an industry-level elasticity or a firm-level elasticity in assessing the impact of a price change? The answer depends on what the firm expects its rivals to do. If a firm expects that rivals will quickly match its price change, then the industry-level elasticity is appropriate. If, by contrast, a firm expects that rivals will not match its price change (or will do so only after a long lag), then the brandlevel elasticity is appropriate. For example, Pepsi’s price cut succeeded because Coke did not retaliate. Had Coke cut its price, the outcome of Pepsi’s strategy would have been different. Making educated conjectures about how rivals will respond to pricing moves is a fascinating subject. We will encounter this subject again in Chapter 5.

TOTAL REVENUE AND MARGINAL REVENUE FUNCTIONS

A firm’s total revenue function, denoted by TR(Q), indicates how the firm’s sales revenues vary as a function of how much product it sells. Recalling our interpretation of the demand curve as showing the highest price P(Q) that the firm can charge and sell exactly Q units of output, we can express total revenue as

TR(Q) 5 P(Q)Q

Just as a firm is interested in the impact of a change in output on its costs, it is also interested in how a change in output will affect its revenues. A firm’s marginal revenue, MR(Q), is analogous to its marginal cost. It represents the rate of change in total revenue that results from the sale of DQ additional units of output:

MR(Q) 5

TR(Q 1 DQ) 2 TR(Q)

DQ

It seems plausible that total revenue would go up as the firm sells more output, and thus MR would always be positive. But with a downward-sloping demand curve, this is not necessarily true. To sell more, the firm must lower its price. Thus, while it generates revenue on the extra units of output it sells at the lower price, it loses revenue on all the units it would have sold at the higher price. Economists call this the revenue destruction effect. For example, an online electronics retailer may sell 110 DVDs per day at a price of $11 per disc and 120 DVDs at $9 per disc. It gains additional

Total Revenue and Marginal Revenue Functions 25

revenue of $90 per day on the extra 10 DVDs sold at the lower price of $9, but it sacrifices $220 per day on the 110 DVDs that it could have sold for $2 more. The marginal revenue in this case would equal 2 $130/10 or 2 $13; the store loses sales revenue of $13 for each additional DVD it sells when it drops its price from $11 to $9.

In general, whether marginal revenue is positive or negative depends on the price elasticity of demand. The formal relationship (whose derivation is not important for our purposes) is

MR(Q) 5 Pa1 2 1 b

For example, if 5 0.75, and the current price P 5 $15, then marginal revenue MR 5 15(1 2 1/0.75) 5 2 $5. More generally,

When demand is elastic, so that . 1, it follows that MR . 0. In this case, the increase in output brought about by a reduction in price will raise total sales revenues.

When demand is inelastic, so that , 1, it follows that MR , 0. Here, the increase in output brought about by a reduction in price will lower total sales revenue.

Note that this formula implies that MR , P. This makes sense in light of what we just discussed. The price P is the additional revenue the firm gets from each additional unit it sells, but the overall change in revenues from selling an additional unit must factor in the revenue destruction effect.

Figure P.9 shows the graph of a demand curve and its associated marginal revenue curve. Because MR , P, the marginal revenue curve must lie everywhere below the demand curve, except at a quantity of zero. For most demand curves, the marginal revenue curve is everywhere downward sloping and at some point will shift from being positive to negative. (This occurs at output Q’ in the figure.)

FIGURE P.9

The Marginal Revenue Curve and the Demand Curve

MR represents the marginal revenue curve associated with the demand curve D. Because MR , P, the marginal revenue curve must lie everywhere below the demand curve except at a quantity of 0. Marginal revenue is negative for quantities in excess of Q9.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Price, marginal revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

D

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q

 

 

 

 

 

Q Quantity

 

 

 

MR

26 Economics Primer: Basic Principles

THEORY OF THE FIRM: PRICING AND OUTPUT DECISIONS

Part Two of this book studies the structure of markets and competitive rivalry within industries. To set the stage for this analysis, we need to explore the theory of the firm, a theory of how firms choose their prices and quantities. This theory has both explanatory power and prescriptive usefulness. That is, it sheds light on how prices are established in markets, and it also provides tools to aid managers in making pricing decisions.

The theory of the firm assumes that the firm’s ultimate objective is to make as large a profit as possible. The theory is therefore appropriate to managers whose goal is to maximize profits. Some analysts argue that not all managers seek to maximize profits, so that the theory of the firm is less useful for describing actual firm behavior. An extensive discussion of the descriptive validity of the profit-max- imization hypothesis would take us beyond this primer. Suffice it to say that a powerful “evolutionary” argument supports the profit-maximization hypothesis: if, over the long haul, a firm’s managers did not strive to achieve the largest amount of profit consistent with industry economics and its own particular resources, the firm would either disappear or its management would be replaced by one that better served the owners’ interests.

Ideally, for any given amount of output the firm might want to sell, it would prefer to set price as high as it could. As we have seen, though, the firm’s demand curve limits what that price can be. How, then, is the optimal output determined? This is where the concepts of marginal revenue and marginal cost become useful. Recalling that “marginals” are rates of change (change in cost or revenue per oneunit change in output), the change in revenue, cost, and profit from changing output by DQ units (where DQ can either represent an increase in output, in which case it is a positive amount, or a decrease in output, in which case it is a negative amount) is

Change in Total Revenue 5 MR 3 DQ

Change in Total Cost 5 MC 3 DQ

Change in Total Profit 5 (MR 2 MC) 3 DQ

The firm clearly would like to increase profit. Here’s how:

If MR . MC, the firm can increase profit by selling more (DQ . 0), and to do so, it should lower its price.

If MR , MC, the firm can increase profit by selling less (DQ , 0), and to do so, it should raise its price.

If MR 5 MC, the firm cannot increase profits by either increasing or decreasing output. It follows that output and price must be at their optimal levels.

Figure P.10 shows a firm whose output and price are at their optimal levels. The curve D is the firm’s demand curve, MR is the marginal revenue curve, and MC is the marginal cost curve. The optimal output occurs where MR 5 MC, that is, where the MR and MC curves intersect. This is output Q* in the diagram. The optimal price P* is the associated price on the demand curve.

Theory of the Firm: Pricing and Output Decisions 27

An alternative and perhaps more managerially relevant way of thinking about these principles is to express MR in terms of the price elasticity of demand. Then the term MR 5 MC can be written as

P a1 2 1 b 5 MC

Let us now suppose, that as a first approximation, the firm’s total variable costs are directly proportional to output, so that MC 5 c, where c is the firm’s average variable cost. The percentage contribution margin or PCM on additional units sold is the ratio of profit per unit to revenue per unit, or PCM 5 (P 2 c)/P. Algebra establishes that

MR 2 MC . 0 as . 1yPCM

MR 2 MC , 0 as , 1yPCM

which implies that

A firm should lower its price whenever the price elasticity of demand exceeds the reciprocal of the percentage contribution margin on the additional units it would sell by lowering its price.

A firm should raise its price when the price elasticity of demand is less than the reciprocal of the percentage contribution margin of the units it would not sell by raising its price.

These principles can guide pricing decisions even though managers do not know the firm’s demand curve or marginal cost function. Managers have only to make educated conjectures about the relative magnitude of elasticities and contribution margins.10 An example may help cement these concepts. Suppose P 5 $10 and c 5 $5, so PCM 5 0.50. Then the firm can increase profits by lowering its price if its price elasticity of demand exceeds 1/0.5 5 2. If, instead, P 5 $10 and c 5 $8, so that PCM 5 0.2, the firm should cut its price if . 5. As this example shows, the lower a firm’s PCM (e.g., because its marginal cost is high), the greater its price elasticity of demand must be for a price-cutting strategy to raise profits.

FIGURE P.10

Optimal Quantity and Price for a Profit-Maximizing Firm

The firm’s optimal quantity occurs at Q*, where MR 5 MC. The optimal price P* is the price the firm must charge to sell Q* units. It is found from the demand curve.

Price, marginal revenue

P*

MC

D

Q*

Q Quantity

MR

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]