Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Eviews5 / EViews5 / Docs / EViews 5 Users Guide.pdf
Скачиваний:
193
Добавлен:
23.03.2015
Размер:
11.51 Mб
Скачать

Principal Components—385

Table 1: Conditional table for MARRIED=0:

 

 

 

UNION

 

Count

 

0

1

Total

 

[0, 1)

0

0

0

 

[1, 2)

167

8

175

LWAGE

[2, 3)

121

44

165

 

[3, 4)

17

2

19

 

[4, 5)

0

0

0

 

Total

305

54

359

Measures of Association

Value

 

 

Phi Coefficient

 

0.302101

 

 

Cramer's V

 

0.302101

 

 

Contingency Coefficient

0.289193

 

 

Table Statistics

 

df

Value

Prob

Pearson X2

 

2

32.76419

7.68E-08

Likelihood Ratio G2

 

2

34.87208

2.68E-08

Note: Expected value is less than 5 in 16.67% of cells (1 of 6).

Bear in mind that these measures of association are computed for each two-way table. The conditional tables are presented at the top, and the unconditional tables are reported at the bottom of the view.

Principal Components

The principal components view of the group displays the Eugene-decomposition of the sample second moment of a group of series. Select View/Principal Components... to call up the dialog.

You may either decompose the sample covariance matrix or the correlation matrix computed for the series in the group. The sample second moment matrix is computed using data in the current workfile sample. If there are any missing values, the sample second moment is computed using the common sample where observations within the workfile range with missing values are dropped.

There is also a checkbox that allows you to correct for degrees of freedom in the computation of the covariances. If you select this option, EViews will divide the sum of squared deviations by n − 1 instead of n .

You may store the results in your workfile by simply providing the names in the appropriate fields. To store the first k principal component series, simply list k names in the Com-

386—Chapter 12. Groups

ponent series edit field, each separated by a space. Note that you cannot store more principal components than there are series in the group. You may also store the eigenvalues and eigenvectors in a named vector and matrix.

The principal component view displays output that looks as follows:

Date: 10/31/00 Time: 16:05

Sample: 1 74

Included observations: 74

Correlation of X1 X2 X3 X4

 

Comp 1

Comp 2

Comp 3

Comp 4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eigenvalue

3.497500

0.307081

0.152556

0.042863

Variance Prop.

0.874375

0.076770

0.038139

0.010716

Cumulative Prop.

0.874375

0.951145

0.989284

1.000000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eigenvectors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable

Vector 1

Vector 2

Vector 3

Vector 4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X1

-0.522714

-0.164109

-0.236056

0.802568

X2

-0.512619

-0.074307

-0.660639

-0.543375

X3

-0.491857

-0.537452

0.640927

-0.241731

X4

0.471242

-0.823827

-0.311521

0.046838

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The column headed by “Comp1” and “Vector1” corresponds to the first principal component, “Comp2” and “Vector2” denote the second principal component and so on. The row labeled “Eigenvalue” reports the eigenvalues of the sample second moment matrix in descending order from left to right. The Variance Prop. row displays the variance proportion explained by each principal component. This value is simply the ratio of each eigenvalue to the sum of all eigenvalues. The Cumulative Prop. row displays the cumulative sum of the Variance Prop. row from left to right and is the variance proportion explained by principal components up to that order.

The second part of the output table displays the eigenvectors corresponding to each eigenvalue. The first principal component is computed as a linear combination of the series in the group with weights given by the first eigenvector. The second principal component is the linear combination with weights given by the second eigenvector and so on.

Correlations, Covariances, and Correlograms

Correlations and Covariances display the correlation and covariance matrices of the series in the group. The Common Sample view drops observations for which any one of the series has missing data in the current sample. The Pairwise Samples view computes each of the second moments using all non-missing observations for the relevant series. Note that Pairwise Samples returns entries that correspond to @cov(x,y) and @cor(x,y)

Cross Correlations and Correlograms—387

functions. For unbalanced samples, the Pairwise Samples method uses the maximum number of observations, but may result in a non-positive definite matrix.

Correlogram displays the autocorrelations and partial autocorrelations of the first series in the group. See “Correlogram” on page 326, for a description of the correlogram view.

Cross Correlations and Correlograms

This view displays the cross correlations of the first two series in the group. The cross correlations between the two series x and y are given by,

 

 

 

cxy( l)

 

 

 

 

 

where l = 0, ± 1, ±2, …

(12.9)

rxy( l) = --------------------------------------------,

 

 

cxx( 0)

cyy(

0 )

 

 

 

 

 

and,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T l

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Σ

( ( xt

 

 

)( yt + l

 

 

) ) ⁄ T

l = 0, 1, 2, …

 

 

x

y

 

cxy( l)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

= t = 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(12.10)

 

 

T + l

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Σ ( ( yt

 

) ( xt l

 

) ) ⁄ T

l = 0, −1, −2, …

 

 

y

x

 

 

 

t = 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note that, unlike the autocorrelations, cross correlations are not necessarily symmetric around lag 0.

The dotted lines in the cross correlograms are the approximate two standard error bounds computed as ± 2 ⁄ (T ) .

Cointegration Test

This view carries out the Johansen test for whether the series in the group are cointegrated or not. “Cointegration Test” on page 739 discusses the Johansen test in detail and describes how one should interpret the test results.

Unit Root Test

This view carries out the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF), GLS transformed Dickey-Fuller (DFGLS), Phillips-Perron (PP), Kwiatkowski, et. al. (KPSS), Elliot, Richardson and Stock (ERS) Point Optimal, and Ng and Perron (NP) unit root tests for whether the series in the group (or the first or second differences of the series) are stationary.

See “Panel Unit Root Tests” on page 530 for additional discussion.

388—Chapter 12. Groups

Granger Causality

Correlation does not necessarily imply causation in any meaningful sense of that word. The econometric graveyard is full of magnificent correlations, which are simply spurious or meaningless. Interesting examples include a positive correlation between teachers’ salaries and the consumption of alcohol and a superb positive correlation between the death rate in the UK and the proportion of marriages solemnized in the Church of England. Economists debate correlations which are less obviously meaningless.

The Granger (1969) approach to the question of whether x causes y is to see how much of the current y can be explained by past values of y and then to see whether adding lagged values of x can improve the explanation. y is said to be Granger-caused by x if x helps in the prediction of y , or equivalently if the coefficients on the lagged x ’s are statistically significant. Note that two-way causation is frequently the case; x Granger causes y and y Granger causes x .

It is important to note that the statement “ x Granger causes y ” does not imply that y is the effect or the result of x . Granger causality measures precedence and information content but does not by itself indicate causality in the more common use of the term.

When you select the Granger Causality view, you will first see a dialog box asking for the number of lags to use in the test regressions. In general, it is better to use more rather than fewer lags, since the theory is couched in terms of the relevance of all past information.

You should pick a lag length, l , that corresponds to reasonable beliefs about the longest time over which one of the variables could help predict the other.

EViews runs bivariate regressions of the form:

yt = α0 + α1yt − 1 + + αlyt l + β1xt − 1 + + βlxl + t

(12.11)

xt = α0 + α1xt − 1 + + αlxt l + β1yt − 1 + + βlyl + ut

for all possible pairs of (x, y ) series in the group. The reported F-statistics are the Wald statistics for the joint hypothesis:

β1 = β2 = = βl = 0

(12.12)

for each equation. The null hypothesis is that x does not Granger-cause y in the first regression and that y does not Granger-cause x in the second regression. The test results are given by:

Соседние файлы в папке Docs