- •Contents
- •Preface
- •Chapter 1 Introduction (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 2 Small antennas (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 3 Properties of small antennas (K. Fujimoto and Y. Kim)
- •Chapter 4 Fundamental limitation of small antennas (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 5 Subjects related with small antennas (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 6 Principles and techniques for making antennas small (H. Morishita and K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 7 Design and practice of small antennas I (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 8 Design and practice of small antennas II (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 9 Evaluation of small antenna performance (H. Morishita)
- •Chapter 10 Electromagnetic simulation (H. Morishita and Y. Kim)
- •Chapter 11 Glossary (K. Fujimoto and N. T. Hung)
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Small antennas
- •3 Properties of small antennas
- •3.1 Performance of small antennas
- •3.1.1 Input impedance
- •3.1.4 Gain
- •3.2 Importance of impedance matching in small antennas
- •3.3 Problems of environmental effect in small antennas
- •4 Fundamental limitations of small antennas
- •4.1 Fundamental limitations
- •4.2 Brief review of some typical work on small antennas
- •5 Subjects related with small antennas
- •5.1 Major subjects and topics
- •5.1.1 Investigation of fundamentals of small antennas
- •5.1.2 Realization of small antennas
- •5.2 Practical design problems
- •5.3 General topics
- •6 Principles and techniques for making antennas small
- •6.1 Principles for making antennas small
- •6.2 Techniques and methods for producing ESA
- •6.2.1 Lowering the antenna resonance frequency
- •6.2.1.1 SW structure
- •6.2.1.1.1 Periodic structures
- •6.2.1.1.3 Material loading on an antenna structure
- •6.2.2 Full use of volume/space circumscribing antenna
- •6.2.3 Arrangement of current distributions uniformly
- •6.2.4 Increase of radiation modes
- •6.2.4.2 Use of conjugate structure
- •6.2.4.3 Compose with different types of antennas
- •6.2.5 Applications of metamaterials to make antennas small
- •6.2.5.1 Application of SNG to small antennas
- •6.2.5.1.1 Matching in space
- •6.2.5.1.2 Matching at the load terminals
- •6.2.5.2 DNG applications
- •6.3 Techniques and methods to produce FSA
- •6.3.1 FSA composed by integration of components
- •6.3.2 FSA composed by integration of functions
- •6.3.3 FSA of composite structure
- •6.4 Techniques and methods for producing PCSA
- •6.4.2 PCSA employing a high impedance surface
- •6.5 Techniques and methods for making PSA
- •6.5.2 Simple PSA
- •6.6 Optimization techniques
- •6.6.1 Genetic algorithm
- •6.6.2 Particle swarm optimization
- •6.6.3 Topology optimization
- •6.6.4 Volumetric material optimization
- •6.6.5 Practice of optimization
- •6.6.5.1 Outline of particle swarm optimization
- •6.6.5.2 PSO application method and result
- •7 Design and practice of small antennas I
- •7.1 Design and practice
- •7.2 Design and practice of ESA
- •7.2.1 Lowering the resonance frequency
- •7.2.1.1 Use of slow wave structure
- •7.2.1.1.1 Periodic structure
- •7.2.1.1.1.1 Meander line antennas (MLA)
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.1 Dipole-type meander line antenna
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.2 Monopole-type meander line antenna
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.3 Folded-type meander line antenna
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.4 Meander line antenna mounted on a rectangular conducting box
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.5 Small meander line antennas of less than 0.1 wavelength [13]
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.6 MLAs of length L = 0.05 λ [13, 14]
- •7.2.1.1.1.2 Zigzag antennas
- •7.2.1.1.1.3 Normal mode helical antennas (NMHA)
- •7.2.1.1.1.4 Discussions on small NMHA and meander line antennas pertaining to the antenna performances
- •7.2.1.2 Extension of current path
- •7.2.2 Full use of volume/space
- •7.2.2.1.1 Meander line
- •7.2.2.1.4 Spiral antennas
- •7.2.2.1.4.1 Equiangular spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.2 Archimedean spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.3.2 Gain
- •7.2.2.1.4.4 Radiation patterns
- •7.2.2.1.4.5 Unidirectional pattern
- •7.2.2.1.4.6 Miniaturization of spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.1 Slot spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.2 Spiral antenna loaded with capacitance
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.3 Archimedean spiral antennas
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.4 Spiral antenna loaded with inductance
- •7.2.2.2 Three-dimensional (3D) structure
- •7.2.2.2.1 Koch trees
- •7.2.2.2.2 3D spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.2.3 Spherical helix
- •7.2.2.2.3.1 Folded semi-spherical monopole antennas
- •7.2.2.2.3.2 Spherical dipole antenna
- •7.2.2.2.3.3 Spherical wire antenna
- •7.2.2.2.3.4 Spherical magnetic (TE mode) dipoles
- •7.2.2.2.3.5 Hemispherical helical antenna
- •7.2.3 Uniform current distribution
- •7.2.3.1 Loading techniques
- •7.2.3.1.1 Monopole with top loading
- •7.2.3.1.2 Cross-T-wire top-loaded monopole with four open sleeves
- •7.2.3.1.3 Slot loaded with spiral
- •7.2.4 Increase of excitation mode
- •7.2.4.1.1 L-shaped quasi-self-complementary antenna
- •7.2.4.1.2 H-shaped quasi-self-complementary antenna
- •7.2.4.1.3 A half-circular disk quasi-self-complementary antenna
- •7.2.4.1.4 Sinuous spiral antenna
- •7.2.4.2 Conjugate structure
- •7.2.4.2.1 Electrically small complementary paired antenna
- •7.2.4.2.2 A combined electric-magnetic type antenna
- •7.2.4.3 Composite structure
- •7.2.4.3.1 Slot-monopole hybrid antenna
- •7.2.4.3.2 Spiral-slots loaded with inductive element
- •7.2.5 Applications of metamaterials
- •7.2.5.1 Applications of SNG (Single Negative) materials
- •7.2.5.1.1.2 Elliptical patch antenna
- •7.2.5.1.1.3 Small loop loaded with CLL
- •7.2.5.1.2 Epsilon-Negative Metamaterials (ENG MM)
- •7.2.5.2 Applications of DNG (Double Negative Materials)
- •7.2.5.2.1 Leaky wave antenna [116]
- •7.2.5.2.3 NRI (Negative Refractive Index) TL MM antennas
- •7.2.6 Active circuit applications to impedance matching
- •7.2.6.1 Antenna matching in transmitter/receiver
- •7.2.6.2 Monopole antenna
- •7.2.6.3 Loop and planar antenna
- •7.2.6.4 Microstrip antenna
- •8 Design and practice of small antennas II
- •8.1 FSA (Functionally Small Antennas)
- •8.1.1 Introduction
- •8.1.2 Integration technique
- •8.1.2.1 Enhancement/improvement of antenna performances
- •8.1.2.1.1 Bandwidth enhancement and multiband operation
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.1 E-shaped microstrip antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.2 -shaped microstrip antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.3 H-shaped microstrip antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.4 S-shaped-slot patch antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.2.1 Microstrip slot antennas
- •8.1.2.1.1.2.2.2 Rectangular patch with square slot
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.1 A printed λ/8 PIFA operating at penta-band
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.2 Bent-monopole penta-band antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.3 Loop antenna with a U-shaped tuning element for hepta-band operation
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.4 Planar printed strip monopole for eight-band operation
- •8.1.2.1.2.2.2 Folded loop antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.2 Monopole UWB antennas
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.2.1 Binomial-curved patch antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.2.2 Spline-shaped antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3 UWB antennas with slot/slit embedded on the patch surface
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3.1 A beveled square monopole patch with U-slot
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3.2 Circular/Elliptical slot UWB antennas
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3.3 A rectangular monopole patch with a notch and a strip
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.4.1 Pentagon-shape microstrip slot antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.4.2 Sectorial loop antenna (SLA)
- •8.1.3 Integration of functions into antenna
- •8.2 Design and practice of PCSA (Physically Constrained Small Antennas)
- •8.2.2 Application of HIS (High Impedance Surface)
- •8.2.3 Applications of EBG (Electromagnetic Band Gap)
- •8.2.3.1 Miniaturization
- •8.2.3.2 Enhancement of gain
- •8.2.3.3 Enhancement of bandwidth
- •8.2.3.4 Reduction of mutual coupling
- •8.2.4 Application of DGS (Defected Ground Surface)
- •8.2.4.2 Multiband circular disk monopole patch antenna
- •8.2.5 Application of DBE (Degenerated Band Edge) structure
- •8.3 Design and practice of PSA (Physically Small Antennas)
- •8.3.1 Small antennas for radio watch/clock systems
- •8.3.2 Small antennas for RFID
- •8.3.2.1 Dipole and monopole types
- •8.3.2.3 Slot type antennas
- •8.3.2.4 Loop antenna
- •Appendix I
- •Appendix II
- •References
- •9 Evaluation of small antenna performance
- •9.1 General
- •9.2 Practical method of measurement
- •9.2.1 Measurement by using a coaxial cable
- •9.2.2 Method of measurement by using small oscillator
- •9.2.3 Method of measurement by using optical system
- •9.3 Practice of measurement
- •9.3.1 Input impedance and bandwidth
- •9.3.2 Radiation patterns and gain
- •10 Electromagnetic simulation
- •10.1 Concept of electromagnetic simulation
- •10.2 Typical electromagnetic simulators for small antennas
- •10.3 Example (balanced antennas for mobile handsets)
- •10.3.2 Antenna structure
- •10.3.3 Analytical results
- •10.3.4 Simulation for characteristics of a folded loop antenna in the vicinity of human head and hand
- •10.3.4.1 Structure of human head and hand
- •10.3.4.2 Analytical results
- •11 Glossary
- •11.1 Catalog of small antennas
- •11.2 List of small antennas
- •Index
10.3 Example (balanced antennas for mobile handsets) |
405 |
|
|
0 dB -2 dB -4 dB -6 dB -8 dB -10 dB -12 dB -14 dB
-16 dB
-18 dB (a) Unbalanced-fed
-20 dB -22 dB -24 dB -26 dB -28 dB -30 dB -32 dB -34 dB -36 dB -38 dB -40 dB
(b) Balanced-fed
Figure 10.13 Current distribution of a folded loop antenna in the vicinity of a spherical head model (f0 = 1860 MHz): (a) unbalanced feed and (b) balanced feed.
and the boundary of the handset, because the antenna is assumed to be surrounded by a housing for avoiding direct contact between the user’s hand and the interior elements.
In the MoM simulator, the number of cells per wavelength is 10 and the numbers of total cells of unbalanced-fed and balanced-fed models are 2864 and 2918, respectively. In the FDTD simulator, models are divided into non-uniform meshing of 0.5 to 4 mm and the numbers of total cells of unbalanced-fed and balanced-fed models are 367 275 and 313 880, respectively. In the FEM simulator, the numbers of total cells of unbalanced-fed and balanced-fed models are 18 345 and 12 253, respectively. In the FIM simulator, the total number of cells of unbalanced-fed and balanced-fed models are 9 660 189.
Figure 10.13 shows the simulated current distribution on the GP in the vicinity of the head model by using the MoM simulator, where (a) and (b) are the currents of unbalanced and balanced-fed models. As in the case of free space, the current on the GP is reduced even in the vicinity of the head model. Moreover, the result of an unbalanced-fed model agrees very well with that of a balanced-fed model. This shows that the self-balance effect is still maintained even though a folded loop is located in the vicinity of the human head.
10.3.4.2Analytical results
Figure 10.14 shows the radiation patterns in the vicinity of the head model, where (a) and (b) are the radiation patterns of unbalanced and balanced-fed models. In the figure, the difference of about 4 dB between the simulated and measured results is seen in the vicinity of a head model, while they are almost the same in the free space. It is considered that the calculated gains by each simulator include the different loss of the impedance mismatch and are different from each other, because the radiation patterns by each simulator are calculated at the center frequency of 1860 MHz. Furthermore, users need
406 |
Electromagnetic simulation |
|
|
Table 10.3 Average gain of Eθ and Eφ components in the vicinity of a head model
|
Head model |
Eθ [dBi] |
Eϕ [dBi] |
|
with model : a |
–1.00 |
–9.04 |
Unbalanced-fed |
w/o model : b |
–5.82 |
–17.81 |
|
Difference : c = b − a |
–4.82 |
–8.41 |
|
with model : a |
–1.11 |
–9.40 |
Balanced-fed |
w/o model : b |
–5.73 |
–18.53 |
|
Difference : c = b − a |
–4.62 |
–9.13 |
60°
90°
120°
|
|
Eθ (Mea.) |
Eθ (FDTD) |
Eθ (FIM) |
|
|
|
Eϕ (Mea.) |
Eϕ (FDTD) |
Eϕ (FIM) |
|
|
|
Eθ (MoM) |
Eθ (FEM) |
|
|
|
|
Eϕ (MoM) |
Eϕ (FEM) |
|
|
|
0° |
z |
|
0° |
z |
30° |
5 |
30° |
30° |
5 |
30° |
|
|
||||
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
−5 |
60° |
60° |
−5 |
60° |
|
−10 |
−10 |
|||
|
|
|
|
||
|
−15 |
y |
|
−15 |
y |
|
|
|
|
||
|
20 |
90° |
90° |
20 |
90° |
|
−15 |
|
|
−15 |
|
|
−10 |
|
|
−10 |
|
|
−5 |
120° |
120° |
−5 |
120° |
|
|
|
|
||
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
150° |
5 |
150° |
150° |
5 |
150° |
|
|
|
|
||
|
180° |
|
|
180° |
|
|
(a) Unbalanced-fed |
|
(b) Balanced-fed |
Figure 10.14 Radiation pattern in the vicinity of a spherical head model (f0 = 1860 MHz):
(a) unbalanced feed and (b) balanced feed.
to have more familiarity with each simulator in order to design the optimum geometrical configuration, and they must be acquainted with the application of the simulator. The radiation toward the head is decreased while the gain toward +z direction becomes higher. The same as in free space, the radiation pattern of the unbalanced-fed model is almost the same as that of the balanced-fed model, and this shows that the self-balance effect is still maintained even though a folded loop is located in the vicinity of the human head. Table 10.3 shows the average gain of θ - and φ-components of the electrical field
References 407
Eθ (Mea.) |
Eθ (FDTD) |
Eθ (FIM) |
Eϕ (Mea.) |
Eϕ (FDTD) |
Eϕ (FIM) |
Eθ (MoM) |
Eθ (FEM) |
|
Eϕ (MoM) |
Eϕ (FEM) |
|
|
0° z |
|
30° |
0 |
30° |
|
||
|
−5 |
|
60° |
−10 |
60° |
|
−15 |
y |
|
|
|
90° |
−20 |
90° |
|
−15 |
|
120° |
−10 |
120° |
|
||
|
−5 |
|
150° |
0 |
150° |
|
|
|
|
180° |
|
Figure 10.15 Radiation pattern of an unbalanced-fed model in the vicinity of head and hand models (f0 = 1860 MHz).
in the vicinity of a head model. There is almost no difference between the results of unbalanced and balanced-fed models.
Figure 10.15 shows the radiation pattern of a folded loop antenna in the vicinity of head and hand models at 1860 MHz. By the presence of a hand model, the maximum gain was reduced in the y–z plane.
References
[1]A. Vasylchenko, Y. Schols, W. De Raedt, and G. A. E. Vandenbosch, Quality Assessment of Computational Techniques and Software Tools for Planar-Antenna Analysis, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 51, February 2009, no. 1, pp. 23–38.
[2]M. Taguchi, On Electromagnetic Simulators for Antenna Analysis, Proceedings IEICE General Conference, 1998, C1 TB-1–1, p. 736.
[3]K. Sato, K. Nishikawa, N. Suzuki, and A. Ogawa, Analysis of Antennas Mounted on Portable Equipment Near Human Body, IEICE Transactions (Japan), vol. J79-B-II, November 1996, no. 11, pp. 892–900.
408Electromagnetic simulation
[4]K. Hirasawa and K. Fujimoto, Characteristics of Wire antenna on a Rectangular Conducting Body, IECE Transactions (Japan), vol. J65-B, April 1982, pp. 382–389.
[5]K. Sato, K. Matsumoto, K. Fujimoto, and K. Hirasawa, Characteristics of a Planar Inverted- F Antenna on a Rectangular Conducting Body, IECE Transactions (Japan), vol. J71-B, November 1988, pp. 1237–1243.
[6]K. D. Katsibas, C. A. Balanis, P. A. Tirkas, and C. R. Birtcher, Folded Loop Antenna for Mobile Hand-held Units, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 46, 1998, no. 2, pp. 260–266.
[7]Y. Kim, H. Morishita, Y. Koyanagi, and K. Fujimoto, A Folded Loop Antenna System for Handset Development and Based on the Advanced Design Concept, IEICE Transactions on Communications, vol. E84-B, September 2001, no. 9, pp. 2468–2475.
[8]Zeland Software, Inc., IE3D User’s Manual, Release 8.0, Fremont, 2001.
[9]T. Uno, FDTD for Electromagnetic Field and Antenna Analyses, Corona Publishing Co., Ltd., 1998, p. 2.
[10]Zeland Software, Inc., FIDELITY User’s Manual, release 1.5.
[11]K. Fujimoto and J. R. James, Mobile Antenna Systems Handbook, Artech House, 1994.
[12]J. D. Kraus, Antennas, 2nd edn., McGraw-Hill, 1988.
[13]H. Morishita, Y. Kim, and K. Fujimoto, Design Concept of Antennas for Small Mobile Terminals and the Future Perspective, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 44, October 2002, no. 5, pp. 30–43.
[14]H. Morishita, H. Furuuchi, and K. Fujimoto, Performance of Balance-fed Antenna System for Handsets in the Vicinity of a Human Head or Hand, IEE Proceedings: Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation, vol. 149, April 2002, no. 2, pp. 85–91.
[15]Y. Kim, H. Furuuchi, H. Morishita, and K. Fujimoto, Characteristics of Balance-fed L- type Loop Antenna System for Handsets in Vicinity of Human Head, Proceedings 2000 International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 3, August 2000, pp. 1203– 1206.
[16]H. Morishita, Y. Kim, and K. Fujimoto, Analysis of Handset Antennas in the Vicinity of the Human body by the Electromagnetic Simulator, IEICE Transactions on Electronics, vol. E84-C, July 2001, no. 7, pp. 937–947.
[17]T. Taga and K. Tsunekawa, Performance Analysis of a Built-in Planar Inverted F Antenna for 800 MHz Band Portable Radio Units, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. SAC-5, June 1987, no. 5, pp. 921–929.
[18]K. Hirasawa and K. Fujimoto, Characteristics of Wire Antenna on a Rectangular Conducting Body, IEICE Transactions on Communications (Japanese), vol. J65-B, April 1982, pp. 382–389.
[19]K. Fujimoto, A. Henderson, K. Hirasawa, and J. R. James, Small Antennas, Research Studies Press, UK, 1987.
[20]C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 2nd edn., John Wiley and Sons, 1997.
[21]H. Uchida and Y. Mushiake, VHF-Antenna, Corona Publishing (in Japanese), 1961.
[22]R. C. Johnson, Antenna Engineering Handbook, 3rd edn., McGraw-Hill. Inc., 1961, Chapter 4.
[23]Zeland Software, Inc., IE3D ver. 7.0: www.zeland.com/IE3D.htm
[24]Zeland Software, Inc., Fidelity ver. 3.0: www.zeland.com/Fidelity.htm
[25]Ansoft, HFSS 8.0, The Maxwell Online Help System, 2001.
[26]Computer Simulation Technology AG, CST Microwave Studio ver. 2006: www.cst.com
[27]Schmid & Partner Engineering AG, www.speag.com/