- •Contents
- •Preface
- •Chapter 1 Introduction (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 2 Small antennas (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 3 Properties of small antennas (K. Fujimoto and Y. Kim)
- •Chapter 4 Fundamental limitation of small antennas (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 5 Subjects related with small antennas (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 6 Principles and techniques for making antennas small (H. Morishita and K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 7 Design and practice of small antennas I (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 8 Design and practice of small antennas II (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 9 Evaluation of small antenna performance (H. Morishita)
- •Chapter 10 Electromagnetic simulation (H. Morishita and Y. Kim)
- •Chapter 11 Glossary (K. Fujimoto and N. T. Hung)
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Small antennas
- •3 Properties of small antennas
- •3.1 Performance of small antennas
- •3.1.1 Input impedance
- •3.1.4 Gain
- •3.2 Importance of impedance matching in small antennas
- •3.3 Problems of environmental effect in small antennas
- •4 Fundamental limitations of small antennas
- •4.1 Fundamental limitations
- •4.2 Brief review of some typical work on small antennas
- •5 Subjects related with small antennas
- •5.1 Major subjects and topics
- •5.1.1 Investigation of fundamentals of small antennas
- •5.1.2 Realization of small antennas
- •5.2 Practical design problems
- •5.3 General topics
- •6 Principles and techniques for making antennas small
- •6.1 Principles for making antennas small
- •6.2 Techniques and methods for producing ESA
- •6.2.1 Lowering the antenna resonance frequency
- •6.2.1.1 SW structure
- •6.2.1.1.1 Periodic structures
- •6.2.1.1.3 Material loading on an antenna structure
- •6.2.2 Full use of volume/space circumscribing antenna
- •6.2.3 Arrangement of current distributions uniformly
- •6.2.4 Increase of radiation modes
- •6.2.4.2 Use of conjugate structure
- •6.2.4.3 Compose with different types of antennas
- •6.2.5 Applications of metamaterials to make antennas small
- •6.2.5.1 Application of SNG to small antennas
- •6.2.5.1.1 Matching in space
- •6.2.5.1.2 Matching at the load terminals
- •6.2.5.2 DNG applications
- •6.3 Techniques and methods to produce FSA
- •6.3.1 FSA composed by integration of components
- •6.3.2 FSA composed by integration of functions
- •6.3.3 FSA of composite structure
- •6.4 Techniques and methods for producing PCSA
- •6.4.2 PCSA employing a high impedance surface
- •6.5 Techniques and methods for making PSA
- •6.5.2 Simple PSA
- •6.6 Optimization techniques
- •6.6.1 Genetic algorithm
- •6.6.2 Particle swarm optimization
- •6.6.3 Topology optimization
- •6.6.4 Volumetric material optimization
- •6.6.5 Practice of optimization
- •6.6.5.1 Outline of particle swarm optimization
- •6.6.5.2 PSO application method and result
- •7 Design and practice of small antennas I
- •7.1 Design and practice
- •7.2 Design and practice of ESA
- •7.2.1 Lowering the resonance frequency
- •7.2.1.1 Use of slow wave structure
- •7.2.1.1.1 Periodic structure
- •7.2.1.1.1.1 Meander line antennas (MLA)
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.1 Dipole-type meander line antenna
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.2 Monopole-type meander line antenna
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.3 Folded-type meander line antenna
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.4 Meander line antenna mounted on a rectangular conducting box
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.5 Small meander line antennas of less than 0.1 wavelength [13]
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.6 MLAs of length L = 0.05 λ [13, 14]
- •7.2.1.1.1.2 Zigzag antennas
- •7.2.1.1.1.3 Normal mode helical antennas (NMHA)
- •7.2.1.1.1.4 Discussions on small NMHA and meander line antennas pertaining to the antenna performances
- •7.2.1.2 Extension of current path
- •7.2.2 Full use of volume/space
- •7.2.2.1.1 Meander line
- •7.2.2.1.4 Spiral antennas
- •7.2.2.1.4.1 Equiangular spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.2 Archimedean spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.3.2 Gain
- •7.2.2.1.4.4 Radiation patterns
- •7.2.2.1.4.5 Unidirectional pattern
- •7.2.2.1.4.6 Miniaturization of spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.1 Slot spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.2 Spiral antenna loaded with capacitance
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.3 Archimedean spiral antennas
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.4 Spiral antenna loaded with inductance
- •7.2.2.2 Three-dimensional (3D) structure
- •7.2.2.2.1 Koch trees
- •7.2.2.2.2 3D spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.2.3 Spherical helix
- •7.2.2.2.3.1 Folded semi-spherical monopole antennas
- •7.2.2.2.3.2 Spherical dipole antenna
- •7.2.2.2.3.3 Spherical wire antenna
- •7.2.2.2.3.4 Spherical magnetic (TE mode) dipoles
- •7.2.2.2.3.5 Hemispherical helical antenna
- •7.2.3 Uniform current distribution
- •7.2.3.1 Loading techniques
- •7.2.3.1.1 Monopole with top loading
- •7.2.3.1.2 Cross-T-wire top-loaded monopole with four open sleeves
- •7.2.3.1.3 Slot loaded with spiral
- •7.2.4 Increase of excitation mode
- •7.2.4.1.1 L-shaped quasi-self-complementary antenna
- •7.2.4.1.2 H-shaped quasi-self-complementary antenna
- •7.2.4.1.3 A half-circular disk quasi-self-complementary antenna
- •7.2.4.1.4 Sinuous spiral antenna
- •7.2.4.2 Conjugate structure
- •7.2.4.2.1 Electrically small complementary paired antenna
- •7.2.4.2.2 A combined electric-magnetic type antenna
- •7.2.4.3 Composite structure
- •7.2.4.3.1 Slot-monopole hybrid antenna
- •7.2.4.3.2 Spiral-slots loaded with inductive element
- •7.2.5 Applications of metamaterials
- •7.2.5.1 Applications of SNG (Single Negative) materials
- •7.2.5.1.1.2 Elliptical patch antenna
- •7.2.5.1.1.3 Small loop loaded with CLL
- •7.2.5.1.2 Epsilon-Negative Metamaterials (ENG MM)
- •7.2.5.2 Applications of DNG (Double Negative Materials)
- •7.2.5.2.1 Leaky wave antenna [116]
- •7.2.5.2.3 NRI (Negative Refractive Index) TL MM antennas
- •7.2.6 Active circuit applications to impedance matching
- •7.2.6.1 Antenna matching in transmitter/receiver
- •7.2.6.2 Monopole antenna
- •7.2.6.3 Loop and planar antenna
- •7.2.6.4 Microstrip antenna
- •8 Design and practice of small antennas II
- •8.1 FSA (Functionally Small Antennas)
- •8.1.1 Introduction
- •8.1.2 Integration technique
- •8.1.2.1 Enhancement/improvement of antenna performances
- •8.1.2.1.1 Bandwidth enhancement and multiband operation
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.1 E-shaped microstrip antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.2 -shaped microstrip antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.3 H-shaped microstrip antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.4 S-shaped-slot patch antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.2.1 Microstrip slot antennas
- •8.1.2.1.1.2.2.2 Rectangular patch with square slot
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.1 A printed λ/8 PIFA operating at penta-band
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.2 Bent-monopole penta-band antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.3 Loop antenna with a U-shaped tuning element for hepta-band operation
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.4 Planar printed strip monopole for eight-band operation
- •8.1.2.1.2.2.2 Folded loop antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.2 Monopole UWB antennas
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.2.1 Binomial-curved patch antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.2.2 Spline-shaped antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3 UWB antennas with slot/slit embedded on the patch surface
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3.1 A beveled square monopole patch with U-slot
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3.2 Circular/Elliptical slot UWB antennas
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3.3 A rectangular monopole patch with a notch and a strip
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.4.1 Pentagon-shape microstrip slot antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.4.2 Sectorial loop antenna (SLA)
- •8.1.3 Integration of functions into antenna
- •8.2 Design and practice of PCSA (Physically Constrained Small Antennas)
- •8.2.2 Application of HIS (High Impedance Surface)
- •8.2.3 Applications of EBG (Electromagnetic Band Gap)
- •8.2.3.1 Miniaturization
- •8.2.3.2 Enhancement of gain
- •8.2.3.3 Enhancement of bandwidth
- •8.2.3.4 Reduction of mutual coupling
- •8.2.4 Application of DGS (Defected Ground Surface)
- •8.2.4.2 Multiband circular disk monopole patch antenna
- •8.2.5 Application of DBE (Degenerated Band Edge) structure
- •8.3 Design and practice of PSA (Physically Small Antennas)
- •8.3.1 Small antennas for radio watch/clock systems
- •8.3.2 Small antennas for RFID
- •8.3.2.1 Dipole and monopole types
- •8.3.2.3 Slot type antennas
- •8.3.2.4 Loop antenna
- •Appendix I
- •Appendix II
- •References
- •9 Evaluation of small antenna performance
- •9.1 General
- •9.2 Practical method of measurement
- •9.2.1 Measurement by using a coaxial cable
- •9.2.2 Method of measurement by using small oscillator
- •9.2.3 Method of measurement by using optical system
- •9.3 Practice of measurement
- •9.3.1 Input impedance and bandwidth
- •9.3.2 Radiation patterns and gain
- •10 Electromagnetic simulation
- •10.1 Concept of electromagnetic simulation
- •10.2 Typical electromagnetic simulators for small antennas
- •10.3 Example (balanced antennas for mobile handsets)
- •10.3.2 Antenna structure
- •10.3.3 Analytical results
- •10.3.4 Simulation for characteristics of a folded loop antenna in the vicinity of human head and hand
- •10.3.4.1 Structure of human head and hand
- •10.3.4.2 Analytical results
- •11 Glossary
- •11.1 Catalog of small antennas
- •11.2 List of small antennas
- •Index
8.2 Design and practice of PCSA |
335 |
|
|
Figure 8.82 The FSS unit cell ([66], copyright C 2010 IEEE).
impedance bandwidth was obtained, for VSWR < 2, from 2.75 to 8.35 GHz. The radiation pattern was stable and unidirectional, and gain over 6 dB within the frequency band of 2.75 to 6.0 GHz was obtained.
Another example is an FSS with a periodical array of cells, having a pattern that is a combination of a Jerusalem cross and a three-step fractal patch shown in Figure 8.82 [66]. The low-profile monopole antenna on the HIS ground plane with the substrate thickness of 0.07λ was able to obtain an enhanced gain of 7.73 dB from 5.35 dB.
8.2.3Applications of EBG (Electromagnetic Band Gap)
8.2.3.1Miniaturization
A probe-fed patch antenna backed by a mushroom-type EBG substrate is designed, and it demonstrates miniaturization that achieved 66.83% [67]. Miniaturization is achieved by employing the property of EBG structures, which supports slow wave propagation as its first propagating mode, having a longer effective wavelength than those in free space and dielectrics. The EBG structure, over which a patch antenna will be embedded, is designed to operate in its slow wave region in order to achieve a lower frequency operation of the patch antenna for the size reduction. Here the operating frequency of
2.4GHz is used, to which the size of a conventional patch antenna is designed to be
31.9mm in length and 40.9 mm in width. A proposed patch antenna embedded on the mushroom-type EBG surface is illustrated in Figure 8.83, in which a unit cell is shown by its top and side views along with dimensional parameters. The number of cells is designed to have slightly larger area than the patch, so a square surface with 4 × 4 cells to cover the patch is selected. In the initial design, the unit cell size a is chosen to be
5.5 mm, based on the wavelength of slow wave mode λslow = 34.5 mm. Other parameters are Dvia = 0.8, g = 0.25, h1 = 1.524, and h2 = 0.762. The dielectric constant of the substrate is 3.66. By doing optimization, starting from the initial values with λslow/2, the patch size, L (length) × W (width), respectively, is determined to be 18.3 × 17.4 mm. The reduction of the patch area from the area of a conventional patch is estimated to be 66.83% in its ratio, and 49.58% even when the area of the EBG surface is included.
336 |
Design and practice of small antennas II |
|
|
a
g
|
a |
Lpatch |
Coax feed |
y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patch antenna |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W |
patch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Superstrate |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBG patch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substrate |
|
z |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ground |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top view
h2
Dvia h1
Side view
Figure 8.83 Miniaturized patch antenna on a mushroom type EBG substrate ([67], copyrightC 2010 IEEE).
z |
|
|
0.1 mm |
y Dipole |
Dielectric substrate |
ϕ |
|
x |
|
m |
|
g |
Ground |
w |
L2 |
h |
Unit cell |
|
|
L1 |
|
Figure 8.84 A dipole closely placed over an EBG surface ([69], copyright C 2008 IEEE).
The antenna exhibits rather narrow bandwidth and low efficiency because of the thin substrate.
In the paper [67], the effect of EBG on the coupling between two antennas is investigated, showing that H-plane coupling between two units of this type of EBG patch antenna is much lower than that of conventional patches.
8.2.3.2Enhancement of gain
It is natural that gain can be enhanced by a patch antenna when embedded on the EBG surface, because the surface wave on the ground plane is suppressed. Subsequently current flow into the backside of the ground plane can be reduced, leading to increase of radiation into forward directions. A simple example is a dipole antenna embedded on the mushroom-type EBG surface described in [63, 68, 69]. A wideband dipole embedded on the EBG surface is described in [69]. Figure 8.84 illustrates a schematic of the EBG with dipole, giving also dimensional parameters. The antenna is designed to obtain wide bandwidth as well as higher gain based on the optimization of the interaction between impedances of a primary antenna and its imaginary dipoles with the reflection phase of a mushroom-type EBG structure. The peak gain obtained by calculation is between 5.5 and 8.3 dBi over the frequency region from
8.2 Design and practice of PCSA |
337 |
|
|
Figure 8.85 Planer bow-tie antenna closely placed over the EBG ground plane ([71], copyrightC 2008 IEEE).
1.7GHz to 2.5 GHz, while measured and simulated bandwidths are 38% and 41%, respectively. Since the antenna is a balanced type, a balun is necessary for avoiding interference of unbalanced current produced on the feeding cable without a balun. By using a wideband balun, the antenna was shown to obtain wider bandwidth as compared with a case without a balun. The dipole is made of two metal strips with 1-mm width and 45.7-mm length, and is printed on the substrate with εr = 4.5, having the size of 94 × 94 mm. The EBG structure is composed with 6 × 8 cells, each cell (mushroom) having the size of 12.4 mm in width, and 6.0 mm in height, being arrayed with gaps of 0.4 mm. The bandwidth of 1.6–2.5 GHz covers frequency bands of several wireless systems such as DCS (Digital Communication Systems: 1.71–1.88 GHz), GSM (Global Systems for Mobile Communication: 1.85–1.99 GHz), PCS (Personal Communication Systems: 1.85–1.99 GHz), UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunication System: 1.92–2.17 GHz), and WLAN (Wireless Local Network: 2.4–2.485 GHz).
8.2.3.3Enhancement of bandwidth
With the close spacing of a thin dipole and its image element, currents of these elements are in phase, leading to decrease in the reactive energy surrounding the dipole.
Consequentially, the operating bandwidth increases. It was shown that the EBG ground plane requires a reflection phase in the range of 90◦± 45◦ for a low-profile straight wire
dipole antenna to exhibit a good return loss [70] and the design of the EBG ground plane follows to meet this requirement at a desired operating frequency. A dipole is designed to operate at the same frequency, with consideration to placing it closely over the EBG surface.
A dipole antenna introduced previously in [69] was designed by following the above design concept and it demonstrated a fairly wideband performance covering 1.7 GHz–
2.5GHz with center frequency of about 2.0 GHz.
A dipole antenna embedded over the EBG ground plane designed to exhibit about 1.4:1 impedance bandwidth is shown in [71]. In the same way, a bow-tie dipole antenna over the EBG ground plane is described to show much greater bandwidth. Figure 8.85 depicts the antenna placed over the EBG ground plane. The bow-tie dipole antenna has the thickness of 0.01λ, an overall length of 0.30λ, and an overall width of 0.26λ at 300 MHz. It is located 0.02λ over the EBG ground plane, which is composed of
338 |
Design and practice of small antennas II |
|
|
Figure 8.86 A folded bow-tie dipole over the EBG surface ([71], copyright C 2008 IEEE).
|
|
|
|
Dipole |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antenna substrate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBG patches |
h |
|
|
|
Air |
EBG substrate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ground |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 8.87 A diamond dipole backed by the EBG ([72], copyright C 2007 IEEE).
8 × 8 cells (mushrooms), with each cell having the size of 0.12λ, via radius of 0.005λ, gap between cells of 0.02λ, and the substrate (εr = 2.2) thickness of 0.04λ at a frequency of 300 MHz. To obtain good matching for a wide bandwidth, the antenna is modified to a folded structure, with both edges of the bow-tie element folded by a narrow strip over the bow-tie element as shown in Figure 8.86. With this folded bow-tie structure, the –10 dB return loss bandwidth spanned a frequency range from 306 MHz through 419.5 MHz.
Other types of antennas than straight wire and bow-tie can be useful. A square-patch dipole, called a diamond dipole, shown in Figure 8.87 [72] is embedded on the EBG surface and achieved a wide return-loss bandwidth of 1.4:1 (33%) taking the radiation pattern into consideration. Also a sleeve dipole over the EBG is treated similarly and shown to have a bandwidth of 1.28:1 (26%) [72].
8.2.3.4Reduction of mutual coupling
Since the EBG structure has a feature of suppressing the surface wave propagation on the EBG surface because of its bandgap property, the mutual coupling between two