- •Contents
- •Preface
- •Chapter 1 Introduction (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 2 Small antennas (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 3 Properties of small antennas (K. Fujimoto and Y. Kim)
- •Chapter 4 Fundamental limitation of small antennas (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 5 Subjects related with small antennas (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 6 Principles and techniques for making antennas small (H. Morishita and K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 7 Design and practice of small antennas I (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 8 Design and practice of small antennas II (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 9 Evaluation of small antenna performance (H. Morishita)
- •Chapter 10 Electromagnetic simulation (H. Morishita and Y. Kim)
- •Chapter 11 Glossary (K. Fujimoto and N. T. Hung)
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Small antennas
- •3 Properties of small antennas
- •3.1 Performance of small antennas
- •3.1.1 Input impedance
- •3.1.4 Gain
- •3.2 Importance of impedance matching in small antennas
- •3.3 Problems of environmental effect in small antennas
- •4 Fundamental limitations of small antennas
- •4.1 Fundamental limitations
- •4.2 Brief review of some typical work on small antennas
- •5 Subjects related with small antennas
- •5.1 Major subjects and topics
- •5.1.1 Investigation of fundamentals of small antennas
- •5.1.2 Realization of small antennas
- •5.2 Practical design problems
- •5.3 General topics
- •6 Principles and techniques for making antennas small
- •6.1 Principles for making antennas small
- •6.2 Techniques and methods for producing ESA
- •6.2.1 Lowering the antenna resonance frequency
- •6.2.1.1 SW structure
- •6.2.1.1.1 Periodic structures
- •6.2.1.1.3 Material loading on an antenna structure
- •6.2.2 Full use of volume/space circumscribing antenna
- •6.2.3 Arrangement of current distributions uniformly
- •6.2.4 Increase of radiation modes
- •6.2.4.2 Use of conjugate structure
- •6.2.4.3 Compose with different types of antennas
- •6.2.5 Applications of metamaterials to make antennas small
- •6.2.5.1 Application of SNG to small antennas
- •6.2.5.1.1 Matching in space
- •6.2.5.1.2 Matching at the load terminals
- •6.2.5.2 DNG applications
- •6.3 Techniques and methods to produce FSA
- •6.3.1 FSA composed by integration of components
- •6.3.2 FSA composed by integration of functions
- •6.3.3 FSA of composite structure
- •6.4 Techniques and methods for producing PCSA
- •6.4.2 PCSA employing a high impedance surface
- •6.5 Techniques and methods for making PSA
- •6.5.2 Simple PSA
- •6.6 Optimization techniques
- •6.6.1 Genetic algorithm
- •6.6.2 Particle swarm optimization
- •6.6.3 Topology optimization
- •6.6.4 Volumetric material optimization
- •6.6.5 Practice of optimization
- •6.6.5.1 Outline of particle swarm optimization
- •6.6.5.2 PSO application method and result
- •7 Design and practice of small antennas I
- •7.1 Design and practice
- •7.2 Design and practice of ESA
- •7.2.1 Lowering the resonance frequency
- •7.2.1.1 Use of slow wave structure
- •7.2.1.1.1 Periodic structure
- •7.2.1.1.1.1 Meander line antennas (MLA)
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.1 Dipole-type meander line antenna
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.2 Monopole-type meander line antenna
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.3 Folded-type meander line antenna
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.4 Meander line antenna mounted on a rectangular conducting box
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.5 Small meander line antennas of less than 0.1 wavelength [13]
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.6 MLAs of length L = 0.05 λ [13, 14]
- •7.2.1.1.1.2 Zigzag antennas
- •7.2.1.1.1.3 Normal mode helical antennas (NMHA)
- •7.2.1.1.1.4 Discussions on small NMHA and meander line antennas pertaining to the antenna performances
- •7.2.1.2 Extension of current path
- •7.2.2 Full use of volume/space
- •7.2.2.1.1 Meander line
- •7.2.2.1.4 Spiral antennas
- •7.2.2.1.4.1 Equiangular spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.2 Archimedean spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.3.2 Gain
- •7.2.2.1.4.4 Radiation patterns
- •7.2.2.1.4.5 Unidirectional pattern
- •7.2.2.1.4.6 Miniaturization of spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.1 Slot spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.2 Spiral antenna loaded with capacitance
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.3 Archimedean spiral antennas
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.4 Spiral antenna loaded with inductance
- •7.2.2.2 Three-dimensional (3D) structure
- •7.2.2.2.1 Koch trees
- •7.2.2.2.2 3D spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.2.3 Spherical helix
- •7.2.2.2.3.1 Folded semi-spherical monopole antennas
- •7.2.2.2.3.2 Spherical dipole antenna
- •7.2.2.2.3.3 Spherical wire antenna
- •7.2.2.2.3.4 Spherical magnetic (TE mode) dipoles
- •7.2.2.2.3.5 Hemispherical helical antenna
- •7.2.3 Uniform current distribution
- •7.2.3.1 Loading techniques
- •7.2.3.1.1 Monopole with top loading
- •7.2.3.1.2 Cross-T-wire top-loaded monopole with four open sleeves
- •7.2.3.1.3 Slot loaded with spiral
- •7.2.4 Increase of excitation mode
- •7.2.4.1.1 L-shaped quasi-self-complementary antenna
- •7.2.4.1.2 H-shaped quasi-self-complementary antenna
- •7.2.4.1.3 A half-circular disk quasi-self-complementary antenna
- •7.2.4.1.4 Sinuous spiral antenna
- •7.2.4.2 Conjugate structure
- •7.2.4.2.1 Electrically small complementary paired antenna
- •7.2.4.2.2 A combined electric-magnetic type antenna
- •7.2.4.3 Composite structure
- •7.2.4.3.1 Slot-monopole hybrid antenna
- •7.2.4.3.2 Spiral-slots loaded with inductive element
- •7.2.5 Applications of metamaterials
- •7.2.5.1 Applications of SNG (Single Negative) materials
- •7.2.5.1.1.2 Elliptical patch antenna
- •7.2.5.1.1.3 Small loop loaded with CLL
- •7.2.5.1.2 Epsilon-Negative Metamaterials (ENG MM)
- •7.2.5.2 Applications of DNG (Double Negative Materials)
- •7.2.5.2.1 Leaky wave antenna [116]
- •7.2.5.2.3 NRI (Negative Refractive Index) TL MM antennas
- •7.2.6 Active circuit applications to impedance matching
- •7.2.6.1 Antenna matching in transmitter/receiver
- •7.2.6.2 Monopole antenna
- •7.2.6.3 Loop and planar antenna
- •7.2.6.4 Microstrip antenna
- •8 Design and practice of small antennas II
- •8.1 FSA (Functionally Small Antennas)
- •8.1.1 Introduction
- •8.1.2 Integration technique
- •8.1.2.1 Enhancement/improvement of antenna performances
- •8.1.2.1.1 Bandwidth enhancement and multiband operation
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.1 E-shaped microstrip antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.2 -shaped microstrip antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.3 H-shaped microstrip antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.4 S-shaped-slot patch antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.2.1 Microstrip slot antennas
- •8.1.2.1.1.2.2.2 Rectangular patch with square slot
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.1 A printed λ/8 PIFA operating at penta-band
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.2 Bent-monopole penta-band antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.3 Loop antenna with a U-shaped tuning element for hepta-band operation
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.4 Planar printed strip monopole for eight-band operation
- •8.1.2.1.2.2.2 Folded loop antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.2 Monopole UWB antennas
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.2.1 Binomial-curved patch antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.2.2 Spline-shaped antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3 UWB antennas with slot/slit embedded on the patch surface
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3.1 A beveled square monopole patch with U-slot
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3.2 Circular/Elliptical slot UWB antennas
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3.3 A rectangular monopole patch with a notch and a strip
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.4.1 Pentagon-shape microstrip slot antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.4.2 Sectorial loop antenna (SLA)
- •8.1.3 Integration of functions into antenna
- •8.2 Design and practice of PCSA (Physically Constrained Small Antennas)
- •8.2.2 Application of HIS (High Impedance Surface)
- •8.2.3 Applications of EBG (Electromagnetic Band Gap)
- •8.2.3.1 Miniaturization
- •8.2.3.2 Enhancement of gain
- •8.2.3.3 Enhancement of bandwidth
- •8.2.3.4 Reduction of mutual coupling
- •8.2.4 Application of DGS (Defected Ground Surface)
- •8.2.4.2 Multiband circular disk monopole patch antenna
- •8.2.5 Application of DBE (Degenerated Band Edge) structure
- •8.3 Design and practice of PSA (Physically Small Antennas)
- •8.3.1 Small antennas for radio watch/clock systems
- •8.3.2 Small antennas for RFID
- •8.3.2.1 Dipole and monopole types
- •8.3.2.3 Slot type antennas
- •8.3.2.4 Loop antenna
- •Appendix I
- •Appendix II
- •References
- •9 Evaluation of small antenna performance
- •9.1 General
- •9.2 Practical method of measurement
- •9.2.1 Measurement by using a coaxial cable
- •9.2.2 Method of measurement by using small oscillator
- •9.2.3 Method of measurement by using optical system
- •9.3 Practice of measurement
- •9.3.1 Input impedance and bandwidth
- •9.3.2 Radiation patterns and gain
- •10 Electromagnetic simulation
- •10.1 Concept of electromagnetic simulation
- •10.2 Typical electromagnetic simulators for small antennas
- •10.3 Example (balanced antennas for mobile handsets)
- •10.3.2 Antenna structure
- •10.3.3 Analytical results
- •10.3.4 Simulation for characteristics of a folded loop antenna in the vicinity of human head and hand
- •10.3.4.1 Structure of human head and hand
- •10.3.4.2 Analytical results
- •11 Glossary
- •11.1 Catalog of small antennas
- •11.2 List of small antennas
- •Index
332Design and practice of small antennas II
depending upon in which configuration the antenna is set. That is, a ratio Gϕ /Gθ can be higher or lower than unity. By taking advantage of this pattern performance, the antenna can achieve pattern diversity in terms of polarization. It can be also said that the antenna is applicable to diversity of not only polarization, but also power and phase by means of the configuration switching.
Diversity performance is evaluated both theoretically and experimentally. A measure of the diversity performance is the correlation coefficient ρ, which determines the quality of the communication channel in diversity and is defined as the correlation between incident wave envelopes of different polarizations [62]. It is a function of complex incident fields of two polarizations, XPD, a ratio of incident wave powers, and arrival angle distributions of incident waves. With assumption of uniform distribution in the angle of arrival (AoA) and XPD < –10 dB, the simulated ρ is less than 0.12, but with nonuniform distributions, ρ takes different values depending on the configuration, because incident waves have different envelopes depending on the AoA. Thus three envelope correlations, ρ12, ρ13, and ρ23, because of three available pattern configurations, must be taken into consideration. As for the non-uniform AoA distributions, a Laplacian distribution is assumed [59]. With assumption of the Laplacian distribution and XPD = 0 (indoor condition) and 6 dB (urban field condition), ρ is evaluated higher than that in case of uniform distributions, but is estimated to be less than 0.47, which is still a practical and useful value. Experiments verified these simulated results.
It can be said that the reconfigurable cubic antenna is well suited to apply pattern diversity and also power, phase, and polarization diversity.
8.2Design and practice of PCSA (Physically Constrained Small Antennas)
A PCSA is an antenna that is not necessarily ESA, but has portions sized similarly to ESA. Typical PCSAs would be low-profile antennas, having the height comparable with the size of ESA. They are microstrip antennas, PIFAs, and printed antennas.
8.2.1Low-profile structure
Low-profile structure can be comprised of an antenna element and a ground plane, which provides an image effect. When the ground plane is a PEC (Perfect Electric Conductor), the image effect is negative for an electric source placed parallel to the ground plane, whereas it is a positive effect for a magnetic source. The PEC ground plane can be replaced by a high impedance surface (HIS) or a surface that exhibits an electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) property that can produce a positive image of the antenna, reducing the antenna profile as well as improving the antenna performance. Use of EBG is quite beneficial not only for miniaturizing the dimensions, increasing gain, and bandwidth, but also for reducing the mutual coupling between two closely mounted antennas. Recently, much interest has focused on applications of DGS (Defected Ground Surface) associated with low-profile antennas and development of small antennas.
8.2 Design and practice of PCSA |
333 |
|
|
Capacitive FSS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
t2 |
Dielectric |
|
|
|
spacer |
|
|
|
z |
y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
Metal backplane |
Metal rods or vias |
Figure 8.79 3D view of a mushroom-like HIS structure ([64], copyright C 2003 IEEE).
8.2.2Application of HIS (High Impedance Surface)
The concept of HIS was first introduced in 1999 [63], where a mushroom-like HIS surface was treated. The mushroom-like surface has periodic structure, consisting of a lattice of metal plates connected to a solid metal sheet by vertical conducting metal vias. Figure 8.79 shows a sketch of the typical mushroom-like structure [64]. The structure can be visualized as mushrooms protruding from the back-plane surface. Since the protrusions are small compared to the operating wavelength, their electromagnetic properties can be described by using lumped capacitors and inductors, behaving as a network of parallel resonant L-C circuits, which acts as a two-dimensional filter to block the current flow along the surface. The surface impedance is modeled as a parallel resonant L-C circuit, which exhibits high impedance over a predetermined tuned frequency band. The surface acts equivalently as a frequency selective surface (FSS). The HIS can be considered as a kind of two-dimensional photonic crystal that prevents the propagation of radio frequency surface currents within the bandgap. The surface does not support propagating surface waves and its image currents are not in phase reversal, but in-phase, allowing a radiating element to lie directly adjacent to the surface, while still radiating efficiently. Figure 8.80(a) shows an example of the transmission coefficient S21 of a surface with suppression bandwidth from 0.98 to 1.35 GHz and (b) gives the phase of the reflection coefficient of a surface with an operational bandwidth from 0.88 to 1.35 GHz [64].
The HIS has proven to be useful as an antenna ground plane on which the surface wave is suppressed, resulting in less radiation in the backward direction. The reflection phase is unusual, allowing an antenna to lie directly adjacent to the ground plane (HIS) without being shorted out, by which antenna gain is enhanced [63].
Design methodology for the mushroom-like HIS was described in [64].
An HIS can be constituted by surfaces other than the mushroom-like one. Use of periodically corrugated reflectors shown in Figure 8.81 is an example, where a planar hexagonal dipole is placed close to the surface with its axis parallel to the grooves, which in this case is referred to as a system of H-type corrugation surface [65]. When a dipole is placed with its axis perpendicular to the grooves, it is referred to as a system of E-type corrugation surface. By combining E-type and H-type corrugated reflectors, and by applying a UWB dipole with only 21-mm profile on the surface, a very wide
334 |
Design and practice of small antennas II |
|
|
(a)
S21 (dB)
Surface wave measurements: thick foam-core AMC, 1 in 2 vias
−10
−15 |
+90 |
−90 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
−20 |
TM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
−25 |
|
TE |
|
|
|
|
|
||
−30 |
|
|
|
|
−35 |
TE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
−40 |
|
|
|
|
−45 |
981 |
1350 |
|
|
|
TM |
|||
−50 |
MHz |
MHz |
||
|
−55
−60 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400
Frequency (MHz)
|
(degrees) |
(b) |
Phase |
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMC 1-18 |
|
|
−30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMC 1-4 |
|
|
−60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMC 1-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
−90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
−120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
−150 |
|
|
Frequency (GHz) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
−180 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
1.6 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
2.4 |
0.4 |
|
Frequency (GHz) |
882 MHz |
1547 MHz |
Figure 8.80 Measured (a) surface wave transmission coefficient and (b) phase for HIS ([64], copyright C 2003 IEEE).
Figure 8.81 A source dipole antenna over the corrugated ground plane ([65], copyright C 2010 IEEE).