- •Contents
- •Preface
- •Chapter 1 Introduction (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 2 Small antennas (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 3 Properties of small antennas (K. Fujimoto and Y. Kim)
- •Chapter 4 Fundamental limitation of small antennas (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 5 Subjects related with small antennas (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 6 Principles and techniques for making antennas small (H. Morishita and K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 7 Design and practice of small antennas I (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 8 Design and practice of small antennas II (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 9 Evaluation of small antenna performance (H. Morishita)
- •Chapter 10 Electromagnetic simulation (H. Morishita and Y. Kim)
- •Chapter 11 Glossary (K. Fujimoto and N. T. Hung)
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Small antennas
- •3 Properties of small antennas
- •3.1 Performance of small antennas
- •3.1.1 Input impedance
- •3.1.4 Gain
- •3.2 Importance of impedance matching in small antennas
- •3.3 Problems of environmental effect in small antennas
- •4 Fundamental limitations of small antennas
- •4.1 Fundamental limitations
- •4.2 Brief review of some typical work on small antennas
- •5 Subjects related with small antennas
- •5.1 Major subjects and topics
- •5.1.1 Investigation of fundamentals of small antennas
- •5.1.2 Realization of small antennas
- •5.2 Practical design problems
- •5.3 General topics
- •6 Principles and techniques for making antennas small
- •6.1 Principles for making antennas small
- •6.2 Techniques and methods for producing ESA
- •6.2.1 Lowering the antenna resonance frequency
- •6.2.1.1 SW structure
- •6.2.1.1.1 Periodic structures
- •6.2.1.1.3 Material loading on an antenna structure
- •6.2.2 Full use of volume/space circumscribing antenna
- •6.2.3 Arrangement of current distributions uniformly
- •6.2.4 Increase of radiation modes
- •6.2.4.2 Use of conjugate structure
- •6.2.4.3 Compose with different types of antennas
- •6.2.5 Applications of metamaterials to make antennas small
- •6.2.5.1 Application of SNG to small antennas
- •6.2.5.1.1 Matching in space
- •6.2.5.1.2 Matching at the load terminals
- •6.2.5.2 DNG applications
- •6.3 Techniques and methods to produce FSA
- •6.3.1 FSA composed by integration of components
- •6.3.2 FSA composed by integration of functions
- •6.3.3 FSA of composite structure
- •6.4 Techniques and methods for producing PCSA
- •6.4.2 PCSA employing a high impedance surface
- •6.5 Techniques and methods for making PSA
- •6.5.2 Simple PSA
- •6.6 Optimization techniques
- •6.6.1 Genetic algorithm
- •6.6.2 Particle swarm optimization
- •6.6.3 Topology optimization
- •6.6.4 Volumetric material optimization
- •6.6.5 Practice of optimization
- •6.6.5.1 Outline of particle swarm optimization
- •6.6.5.2 PSO application method and result
- •7 Design and practice of small antennas I
- •7.1 Design and practice
- •7.2 Design and practice of ESA
- •7.2.1 Lowering the resonance frequency
- •7.2.1.1 Use of slow wave structure
- •7.2.1.1.1 Periodic structure
- •7.2.1.1.1.1 Meander line antennas (MLA)
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.1 Dipole-type meander line antenna
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.2 Monopole-type meander line antenna
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.3 Folded-type meander line antenna
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.4 Meander line antenna mounted on a rectangular conducting box
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.5 Small meander line antennas of less than 0.1 wavelength [13]
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.6 MLAs of length L = 0.05 λ [13, 14]
- •7.2.1.1.1.2 Zigzag antennas
- •7.2.1.1.1.3 Normal mode helical antennas (NMHA)
- •7.2.1.1.1.4 Discussions on small NMHA and meander line antennas pertaining to the antenna performances
- •7.2.1.2 Extension of current path
- •7.2.2 Full use of volume/space
- •7.2.2.1.1 Meander line
- •7.2.2.1.4 Spiral antennas
- •7.2.2.1.4.1 Equiangular spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.2 Archimedean spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.3.2 Gain
- •7.2.2.1.4.4 Radiation patterns
- •7.2.2.1.4.5 Unidirectional pattern
- •7.2.2.1.4.6 Miniaturization of spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.1 Slot spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.2 Spiral antenna loaded with capacitance
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.3 Archimedean spiral antennas
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.4 Spiral antenna loaded with inductance
- •7.2.2.2 Three-dimensional (3D) structure
- •7.2.2.2.1 Koch trees
- •7.2.2.2.2 3D spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.2.3 Spherical helix
- •7.2.2.2.3.1 Folded semi-spherical monopole antennas
- •7.2.2.2.3.2 Spherical dipole antenna
- •7.2.2.2.3.3 Spherical wire antenna
- •7.2.2.2.3.4 Spherical magnetic (TE mode) dipoles
- •7.2.2.2.3.5 Hemispherical helical antenna
- •7.2.3 Uniform current distribution
- •7.2.3.1 Loading techniques
- •7.2.3.1.1 Monopole with top loading
- •7.2.3.1.2 Cross-T-wire top-loaded monopole with four open sleeves
- •7.2.3.1.3 Slot loaded with spiral
- •7.2.4 Increase of excitation mode
- •7.2.4.1.1 L-shaped quasi-self-complementary antenna
- •7.2.4.1.2 H-shaped quasi-self-complementary antenna
- •7.2.4.1.3 A half-circular disk quasi-self-complementary antenna
- •7.2.4.1.4 Sinuous spiral antenna
- •7.2.4.2 Conjugate structure
- •7.2.4.2.1 Electrically small complementary paired antenna
- •7.2.4.2.2 A combined electric-magnetic type antenna
- •7.2.4.3 Composite structure
- •7.2.4.3.1 Slot-monopole hybrid antenna
- •7.2.4.3.2 Spiral-slots loaded with inductive element
- •7.2.5 Applications of metamaterials
- •7.2.5.1 Applications of SNG (Single Negative) materials
- •7.2.5.1.1.2 Elliptical patch antenna
- •7.2.5.1.1.3 Small loop loaded with CLL
- •7.2.5.1.2 Epsilon-Negative Metamaterials (ENG MM)
- •7.2.5.2 Applications of DNG (Double Negative Materials)
- •7.2.5.2.1 Leaky wave antenna [116]
- •7.2.5.2.3 NRI (Negative Refractive Index) TL MM antennas
- •7.2.6 Active circuit applications to impedance matching
- •7.2.6.1 Antenna matching in transmitter/receiver
- •7.2.6.2 Monopole antenna
- •7.2.6.3 Loop and planar antenna
- •7.2.6.4 Microstrip antenna
- •8 Design and practice of small antennas II
- •8.1 FSA (Functionally Small Antennas)
- •8.1.1 Introduction
- •8.1.2 Integration technique
- •8.1.2.1 Enhancement/improvement of antenna performances
- •8.1.2.1.1 Bandwidth enhancement and multiband operation
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.1 E-shaped microstrip antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.2 -shaped microstrip antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.3 H-shaped microstrip antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.4 S-shaped-slot patch antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.2.1 Microstrip slot antennas
- •8.1.2.1.1.2.2.2 Rectangular patch with square slot
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.1 A printed λ/8 PIFA operating at penta-band
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.2 Bent-monopole penta-band antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.3 Loop antenna with a U-shaped tuning element for hepta-band operation
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.4 Planar printed strip monopole for eight-band operation
- •8.1.2.1.2.2.2 Folded loop antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.2 Monopole UWB antennas
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.2.1 Binomial-curved patch antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.2.2 Spline-shaped antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3 UWB antennas with slot/slit embedded on the patch surface
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3.1 A beveled square monopole patch with U-slot
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3.2 Circular/Elliptical slot UWB antennas
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3.3 A rectangular monopole patch with a notch and a strip
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.4.1 Pentagon-shape microstrip slot antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.4.2 Sectorial loop antenna (SLA)
- •8.1.3 Integration of functions into antenna
- •8.2 Design and practice of PCSA (Physically Constrained Small Antennas)
- •8.2.2 Application of HIS (High Impedance Surface)
- •8.2.3 Applications of EBG (Electromagnetic Band Gap)
- •8.2.3.1 Miniaturization
- •8.2.3.2 Enhancement of gain
- •8.2.3.3 Enhancement of bandwidth
- •8.2.3.4 Reduction of mutual coupling
- •8.2.4 Application of DGS (Defected Ground Surface)
- •8.2.4.2 Multiband circular disk monopole patch antenna
- •8.2.5 Application of DBE (Degenerated Band Edge) structure
- •8.3 Design and practice of PSA (Physically Small Antennas)
- •8.3.1 Small antennas for radio watch/clock systems
- •8.3.2 Small antennas for RFID
- •8.3.2.1 Dipole and monopole types
- •8.3.2.3 Slot type antennas
- •8.3.2.4 Loop antenna
- •Appendix I
- •Appendix II
- •References
- •9 Evaluation of small antenna performance
- •9.1 General
- •9.2 Practical method of measurement
- •9.2.1 Measurement by using a coaxial cable
- •9.2.2 Method of measurement by using small oscillator
- •9.2.3 Method of measurement by using optical system
- •9.3 Practice of measurement
- •9.3.1 Input impedance and bandwidth
- •9.3.2 Radiation patterns and gain
- •10 Electromagnetic simulation
- •10.1 Concept of electromagnetic simulation
- •10.2 Typical electromagnetic simulators for small antennas
- •10.3 Example (balanced antennas for mobile handsets)
- •10.3.2 Antenna structure
- •10.3.3 Analytical results
- •10.3.4 Simulation for characteristics of a folded loop antenna in the vicinity of human head and hand
- •10.3.4.1 Structure of human head and hand
- •10.3.4.2 Analytical results
- •11 Glossary
- •11.1 Catalog of small antennas
- •11.2 List of small antennas
- •Index
112 |
Design and practice of small antennas I |
|
|
η (dB)
N = 10 |
38 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–4 |
22 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
–8 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
Folded type |
|
|
–12 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
Dipole type |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
–16 |
|
0.1 |
0.15 |
0.2 |
0.05 |
|
Antenna length (L/λ)
Figure 7.34 Radiation efficiency of a folded MLA ([14], (copyright C 2005 IEEE).
Lf = 10 mm
W = 35 mm |
W = 35 mm |
d = 1.7 mm |
s = 1.4 mm |
L = 43 mm
Figure 7.35 A trial model of 0.1λ folded MLA ([13], copyright C 2004 IEICE).
W = 35 mm (0.08λ), Lf = 10 mm (0.02λ), d = 1.7 mm (4.0 × 10−3 λ), s = 1.4 mm (3.3 × 10−3 λ), and the thickness of the element made with thin copper plate t = 0.1 mm (2.3 × 10−4 λ) (Figure 7.35). Measured impedance characteristics of both dipole and folded types are shown in Figure 7.36. The folded type is shown to have higher impedance than that of the dipole type as was mentioned before. Radiation patterns of both dipole and folded types are given in Figure 7.37. Gain is evaluated as –5.99 dBd for the dipole type and –2.28 dBd for the folded type, respectively. The gain obtained by using the IE3D simulator was –5.2 dBd for the dipole type and –1.5 dBd for the folded type, showing higher gain of about 3.7 dB in the folded type [13].
7.2.1.1.1.1.6 MLAs of length L = 0.05 λ [13, 14]
Smaller antennas with length 0.05λ were studied and shown to be practically useful, with appreciably high gain of –12 dBd for the dipole type and –10 dBd for the folded type, respectively, even in this small size [14]. A type of MLA, which is sandwiched by two planar dielectric substrates of high dielectric constant εr (Figure 7.38), was developed, and the antenna performances were studied. Figure 7.39 provides dimensional
7.2 Design and practice of ESA |
113 |
|
|
|
|
1.0j |
Folded type |
0.5j |
2.0j |
|
||
|
|
Dipole type
5.0j
|
740 MHz 750 MHz |
|
02 |
−0.2j |
710 MHz 720 MHz |
|
−5.0j |
−0.5j |
−2.0j |
Figure 7.36 Measured impedances of 0.1λ dipole-type and folded-type MLAs ([13], copyrightC 2004 IEICE).
[dBd]
0
|
Folded type |
−10 |
Dipole type |
−20 |
|
Figure 7.37 Radiation patterns of 0.1λ dipole-type and folded-type MLAs ([13], copyright C 2004 IEICE).
Substrate
h εr
h |
|
|
εr |
|
|
||
|
|
Meander line antenna
Figure 7.38 A trial 0.05λ MLA model sandwiched by two high-εr dielectric plates ([14], (copyright C 2005 IEEE).
114 |
Design and practice of small antennas I |
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
εr = 1 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
d = 0.1 mm |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N = 38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W = 0.04λ |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
L = 0.05λ |
|
||||||||||
Freq. = 708.7 MHz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Rin [Ω] |
|
Rr [Ω] |
|
Rl [Ω] |
|
η [dB] |
Gain [dBi] |
|||||||||
26.93 |
|
1.498 |
|
|
25.432 |
−12.5472 |
−12.01 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)εr = 10
d = 0.6 mm h = 1.0 mm
N = 14
W = 0.04λ
L = 0.05λ
Freq. = 704.8 MHz
Rin [Ω] |
Rr [Ω] |
Rl [Ω] |
η [dB] |
Gain [dBi] |
5.809 |
2.035 |
3.774 |
−4.55537 |
−8.72166 |
N = 38
W = 0.04λ
|
|
L = 0.05λ |
||
Freq. = 709.05 MHz |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Rin [Ω] |
Rr [Ω] |
Rl [Ω] |
η [dB] |
Gain [dBi] |
63.83 |
7.166 |
56.664 |
−9.49748 |
−8.81569 |
N = 14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
h = 1.0 mn |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W = 0.04λ |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L = 0.05λ |
||||||||
Freq. = 759.7 MHz |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Rin [Ω] |
Rr [Ω] |
Rl [Ω] |
|
η [dB] |
Gain [dBi] |
|
||||
20.28 |
11.4 |
8.88 |
|
−2.50163 |
−3.61452 |
|
Figure 7.39 Dimensional parameters and radiation performances of 0.05λ MLAs for cases εr = 1 and 10 ([14], copyright C 2005 IEEE).
W = 44.3 mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lf = 2.6 mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
L = 22 |
mm |
|
d = 0.2 (s = 0.3) mm |
|
|
|
d = 0.4 (s = 0.1) mm |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W = 18.9 mm |
W = 24.4 mm |
Figure 7.40 A trial 0.05λ folded MLA model ([13], copyright C 2004 IEICE).
parameters and antenna performances of 0.05λ MLAs of both dipole type and folded type. In the figure, (a) gives results when the substrate εr = 1, while (b) represents the substrate εr = 10. A trial model is depicted in Figure 7.40, which has an asymmetric structure, with the element width d of the driven element (0.2 mm) different from that of the folded element (0.4 mm) in order to keep the loss resistance as small as possible. Antennas are designed for the resonance frequency of 700 MHz for both the
7.2 Design and practice of ESA |
115 |
|
|
1.0j
|
|
|
|
2.0j |
|
|
|
|
2.0j |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2j |
|
715 MHz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0j |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
770 MHz |
|
02 |
05 |
10 |
20 |
50 |
02 |
05 |
10 |
20 |
50 |
|
|
|
740 MHz |
||||||
−0.2j |
|
685 MHz |
|
|
−5.0j |
|
|
|
−5.0j |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
−0.5j |
|
|
|
−2.0j |
−0.5j |
|
|
|
−2.0j |
|
|
−1.0j |
|
|
|
|
−1.0j |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
|
Figure 7.41 Impedance characteristics of 0.05λ dipole-type and folded-type MLA ([13], copyrightC 2004 IEICE).
|
[dBd] |
|
Dipole type |
0 |
Folded type |
|
Figure 7.42 Radiation patterns of 0.05λ dipole-type and folded-type MLA ([13], copyright C 2004 IEICE).
driven element and the folded element. Figure 7.41 illustrates impedance characteristics; (a) for the dipole type and (b) for the folded type. Figure 7.42 shows radiation patterns of both dipole type and folded type. These figures give evidence of advantageous performances of the folded type against the dipole type. Figure 7.43 depicts VSWR performance, showing the bandwidth of about 12 MHz for VSWR = 2, which
116 |
Design and practice of small antennas I |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
VSWR |
2 |
|
12 MHz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
751 |
757 |
763 |
769 |
|
745 |
Frequency (MHz)
Figure 7.43 VSWR performance of 0.05λ folded-type MLA ([13], copyright C 2004 IEICE).
|
|
|
|
j50 |
|
|
|
|
j25 |
N |
= 14 |
|
N = 38 |
|
j100 |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
j12.5 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
j200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
765 |
|
720 |
|
|
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
−1 |
−0.5 |
|
760 |
0 |
710 |
0.5 |
Inf |
|
|
50 |
150 |
||||
0 |
36.9 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
63.83Ω |
|
|||
|
|
|
20.28Ω |
|
|||
|
|
|
705 |
700 |
|
||
|
755 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
−j12.5 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
−j200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
−j25 |
|
|
|
|
|
−j100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
−j50 |
|
|
Figure 7.44 Impedance characteristics of 0.05λ MLA for different N ([14], copyright C 2005 IEEE).
corresponds to 1.6% in terms of the relative bandwidth. Figure 7.44 illustrates impedance characteristics for cases of N = 14 and 38, corresponding to εr = 10 and 1, respectively. Figure 7.45 shows radiation patterns, also for cases N = 14 and 38. Increase in gain for the case N = 14 was observed.
An example of a practically developed small MLA introduced previously (Figure 7.6) [5] is a monopole type etched on both sides of a dielectric substrate (glass epoxy) fed with coplanar waveguide. The antenna element occupies the substrate surface with an area of 61 mm × 61 mm and the meander line of 0.5 mm width is spaced periodically with 0.5 mm. The antenna pattern is designed to receive vertical polarization by the front side and horizontal polarization by the back side by arranging the meander line
7.2 Design and practice of ESA |
117 |
|
|
−3.6 dBi
−8.8 dBi
270
0
[dBi]
−10
−20 −30
180 [deg.]
N = 14
N = 38
90
Figure 7.45 Radiation patterns of 0.05λ MLA for different N ([14], copyright C 2005 IEEE).
|
0 |
|
|
–5 |
|
(dB) |
–10 |
|
loss |
||
|
||
Return |
–15 |
|
|
||
|
–20 |
|
|
–25 |
200 400 600 800 1000
Frequency (MHz)
Figure 7.46 Return-loss characteristics of a MLA shown in Figure 7.6 ([5], copyright C 2006 IEICE).
pattern parallel to the ground plane on the front side, while vertical on the back side. The return-loss characteristics, gain, and calculated radiation patterns, respectively, at 600 MHz are given in Figures 7.46–48. In Figure 7.48, (a) and (b) illustrate radiation patterns on the azimuth plane (y–z plane) and the elevation plane (x–z plane), respectively, for the antenna on the front side, and (c) and (d) show those on the azimuth plane and the elevation plane, respectively, for the antenna on the back side. The gain is evaluated to be greater than –3 dBd in the frequency range between 550 MHz and 800 MHz, and the return-loss characteristic is less than –5 dBd for the frequency range of 500 MHz to 700 MHz. This antenna is designed to receive UHF band terrestrial TV broadcasting.