
- •Contents
- •Preface
- •Chapter 1 Introduction (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 2 Small antennas (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 3 Properties of small antennas (K. Fujimoto and Y. Kim)
- •Chapter 4 Fundamental limitation of small antennas (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 5 Subjects related with small antennas (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 6 Principles and techniques for making antennas small (H. Morishita and K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 7 Design and practice of small antennas I (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 8 Design and practice of small antennas II (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 9 Evaluation of small antenna performance (H. Morishita)
- •Chapter 10 Electromagnetic simulation (H. Morishita and Y. Kim)
- •Chapter 11 Glossary (K. Fujimoto and N. T. Hung)
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Small antennas
- •3 Properties of small antennas
- •3.1 Performance of small antennas
- •3.1.1 Input impedance
- •3.1.4 Gain
- •3.2 Importance of impedance matching in small antennas
- •3.3 Problems of environmental effect in small antennas
- •4 Fundamental limitations of small antennas
- •4.1 Fundamental limitations
- •4.2 Brief review of some typical work on small antennas
- •5 Subjects related with small antennas
- •5.1 Major subjects and topics
- •5.1.1 Investigation of fundamentals of small antennas
- •5.1.2 Realization of small antennas
- •5.2 Practical design problems
- •5.3 General topics
- •6 Principles and techniques for making antennas small
- •6.1 Principles for making antennas small
- •6.2 Techniques and methods for producing ESA
- •6.2.1 Lowering the antenna resonance frequency
- •6.2.1.1 SW structure
- •6.2.1.1.1 Periodic structures
- •6.2.1.1.3 Material loading on an antenna structure
- •6.2.2 Full use of volume/space circumscribing antenna
- •6.2.3 Arrangement of current distributions uniformly
- •6.2.4 Increase of radiation modes
- •6.2.4.2 Use of conjugate structure
- •6.2.4.3 Compose with different types of antennas
- •6.2.5 Applications of metamaterials to make antennas small
- •6.2.5.1 Application of SNG to small antennas
- •6.2.5.1.1 Matching in space
- •6.2.5.1.2 Matching at the load terminals
- •6.2.5.2 DNG applications
- •6.3 Techniques and methods to produce FSA
- •6.3.1 FSA composed by integration of components
- •6.3.2 FSA composed by integration of functions
- •6.3.3 FSA of composite structure
- •6.4 Techniques and methods for producing PCSA
- •6.4.2 PCSA employing a high impedance surface
- •6.5 Techniques and methods for making PSA
- •6.5.2 Simple PSA
- •6.6 Optimization techniques
- •6.6.1 Genetic algorithm
- •6.6.2 Particle swarm optimization
- •6.6.3 Topology optimization
- •6.6.4 Volumetric material optimization
- •6.6.5 Practice of optimization
- •6.6.5.1 Outline of particle swarm optimization
- •6.6.5.2 PSO application method and result
- •7 Design and practice of small antennas I
- •7.1 Design and practice
- •7.2 Design and practice of ESA
- •7.2.1 Lowering the resonance frequency
- •7.2.1.1 Use of slow wave structure
- •7.2.1.1.1 Periodic structure
- •7.2.1.1.1.1 Meander line antennas (MLA)
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.1 Dipole-type meander line antenna
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.2 Monopole-type meander line antenna
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.3 Folded-type meander line antenna
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.4 Meander line antenna mounted on a rectangular conducting box
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.5 Small meander line antennas of less than 0.1 wavelength [13]
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.6 MLAs of length L = 0.05 λ [13, 14]
- •7.2.1.1.1.2 Zigzag antennas
- •7.2.1.1.1.3 Normal mode helical antennas (NMHA)
- •7.2.1.1.1.4 Discussions on small NMHA and meander line antennas pertaining to the antenna performances
- •7.2.1.2 Extension of current path
- •7.2.2 Full use of volume/space
- •7.2.2.1.1 Meander line
- •7.2.2.1.4 Spiral antennas
- •7.2.2.1.4.1 Equiangular spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.2 Archimedean spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.3.2 Gain
- •7.2.2.1.4.4 Radiation patterns
- •7.2.2.1.4.5 Unidirectional pattern
- •7.2.2.1.4.6 Miniaturization of spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.1 Slot spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.2 Spiral antenna loaded with capacitance
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.3 Archimedean spiral antennas
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.4 Spiral antenna loaded with inductance
- •7.2.2.2 Three-dimensional (3D) structure
- •7.2.2.2.1 Koch trees
- •7.2.2.2.2 3D spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.2.3 Spherical helix
- •7.2.2.2.3.1 Folded semi-spherical monopole antennas
- •7.2.2.2.3.2 Spherical dipole antenna
- •7.2.2.2.3.3 Spherical wire antenna
- •7.2.2.2.3.4 Spherical magnetic (TE mode) dipoles
- •7.2.2.2.3.5 Hemispherical helical antenna
- •7.2.3 Uniform current distribution
- •7.2.3.1 Loading techniques
- •7.2.3.1.1 Monopole with top loading
- •7.2.3.1.2 Cross-T-wire top-loaded monopole with four open sleeves
- •7.2.3.1.3 Slot loaded with spiral
- •7.2.4 Increase of excitation mode
- •7.2.4.1.1 L-shaped quasi-self-complementary antenna
- •7.2.4.1.2 H-shaped quasi-self-complementary antenna
- •7.2.4.1.3 A half-circular disk quasi-self-complementary antenna
- •7.2.4.1.4 Sinuous spiral antenna
- •7.2.4.2 Conjugate structure
- •7.2.4.2.1 Electrically small complementary paired antenna
- •7.2.4.2.2 A combined electric-magnetic type antenna
- •7.2.4.3 Composite structure
- •7.2.4.3.1 Slot-monopole hybrid antenna
- •7.2.4.3.2 Spiral-slots loaded with inductive element
- •7.2.5 Applications of metamaterials
- •7.2.5.1 Applications of SNG (Single Negative) materials
- •7.2.5.1.1.2 Elliptical patch antenna
- •7.2.5.1.1.3 Small loop loaded with CLL
- •7.2.5.1.2 Epsilon-Negative Metamaterials (ENG MM)
- •7.2.5.2 Applications of DNG (Double Negative Materials)
- •7.2.5.2.1 Leaky wave antenna [116]
- •7.2.5.2.3 NRI (Negative Refractive Index) TL MM antennas
- •7.2.6 Active circuit applications to impedance matching
- •7.2.6.1 Antenna matching in transmitter/receiver
- •7.2.6.2 Monopole antenna
- •7.2.6.3 Loop and planar antenna
- •7.2.6.4 Microstrip antenna
- •8 Design and practice of small antennas II
- •8.1 FSA (Functionally Small Antennas)
- •8.1.1 Introduction
- •8.1.2 Integration technique
- •8.1.2.1 Enhancement/improvement of antenna performances
- •8.1.2.1.1 Bandwidth enhancement and multiband operation
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.1 E-shaped microstrip antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.2 -shaped microstrip antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.3 H-shaped microstrip antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.4 S-shaped-slot patch antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.2.1 Microstrip slot antennas
- •8.1.2.1.1.2.2.2 Rectangular patch with square slot
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.1 A printed λ/8 PIFA operating at penta-band
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.2 Bent-monopole penta-band antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.3 Loop antenna with a U-shaped tuning element for hepta-band operation
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.4 Planar printed strip monopole for eight-band operation
- •8.1.2.1.2.2.2 Folded loop antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.2 Monopole UWB antennas
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.2.1 Binomial-curved patch antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.2.2 Spline-shaped antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3 UWB antennas with slot/slit embedded on the patch surface
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3.1 A beveled square monopole patch with U-slot
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3.2 Circular/Elliptical slot UWB antennas
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3.3 A rectangular monopole patch with a notch and a strip
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.4.1 Pentagon-shape microstrip slot antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.4.2 Sectorial loop antenna (SLA)
- •8.1.3 Integration of functions into antenna
- •8.2 Design and practice of PCSA (Physically Constrained Small Antennas)
- •8.2.2 Application of HIS (High Impedance Surface)
- •8.2.3 Applications of EBG (Electromagnetic Band Gap)
- •8.2.3.1 Miniaturization
- •8.2.3.2 Enhancement of gain
- •8.2.3.3 Enhancement of bandwidth
- •8.2.3.4 Reduction of mutual coupling
- •8.2.4 Application of DGS (Defected Ground Surface)
- •8.2.4.2 Multiband circular disk monopole patch antenna
- •8.2.5 Application of DBE (Degenerated Band Edge) structure
- •8.3 Design and practice of PSA (Physically Small Antennas)
- •8.3.1 Small antennas for radio watch/clock systems
- •8.3.2 Small antennas for RFID
- •8.3.2.1 Dipole and monopole types
- •8.3.2.3 Slot type antennas
- •8.3.2.4 Loop antenna
- •Appendix I
- •Appendix II
- •References
- •9 Evaluation of small antenna performance
- •9.1 General
- •9.2 Practical method of measurement
- •9.2.1 Measurement by using a coaxial cable
- •9.2.2 Method of measurement by using small oscillator
- •9.2.3 Method of measurement by using optical system
- •9.3 Practice of measurement
- •9.3.1 Input impedance and bandwidth
- •9.3.2 Radiation patterns and gain
- •10 Electromagnetic simulation
- •10.1 Concept of electromagnetic simulation
- •10.2 Typical electromagnetic simulators for small antennas
- •10.3 Example (balanced antennas for mobile handsets)
- •10.3.2 Antenna structure
- •10.3.3 Analytical results
- •10.3.4 Simulation for characteristics of a folded loop antenna in the vicinity of human head and hand
- •10.3.4.1 Structure of human head and hand
- •10.3.4.2 Analytical results
- •11 Glossary
- •11.1 Catalog of small antennas
- •11.2 List of small antennas
- •Index
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 Design and practice of ESA |
193 |
|||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Table 7.21 Characteristics of the manufactured SSR antenna ([78], Copyright C 2010 |
|
|||||||
|
IEEE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f0, MHz |
R0, |
efficiency |
Q |
QLB |
Q/QLB |
|
|
|
simulated (SIE)1 |
403.0 |
43 |
100 % |
564.0 |
165.6 |
3.41 |
|
|
|
simulated (CST)2 |
404.0 |
52 |
76 % |
462.3 |
124.9 |
3.70 |
|
|
|
measured3 |
403.0 |
51 |
73±2 % |
442.9 |
120.9 |
3.66 |
|
|
1PEC wires; infinite PEC ground plane.
2copper wires; infinite PEC ground plane.
31.5 m circular ground plane.
where γ is an angular separation between two neighbor rings. A prototype SSR antenna is fabricated with Nsr = 17, wire diameter = 1.63 mm, driven dipole length α = 33◦. Simulated input impedance is 43 and the resonance frequency is 403 MHz, which corresponds to the antenna electrical size ka = 0.184. Measured input impedance when the antenna is placed on the ground plane of the radius 1.5 m is 51 . Simulated Q/Qlb is comparable with that of the MSH antenna. Performance parameters of the SSR are given in Table 7.21, where both simulated and measured results are provided.
7.2.2.2.3.5 Hemispherical helical antenna
In situations where antennas having compact structure, small size, and yet light weight, are urgently required in aerospace and mobile terminals, use of the hemispherical helix is desirable. New design of the hemispherical helix (HSH) antenna is explored and its wideband performance is introduced in [79]. The antenna is a 4.5 turn HSH with tapered strip radiating element. The width of the tapered element starts with 1 mm and ends with 4 mm, and the hemisphere radius is 20 mm. The antenna is fed at the side with non-linearly tapered matching section, and radiates a circularly polarized wave with wide beam width in the frequency range of 2.2–3.7 GHz. A prototype HSH antenna is constructed and measured for axial ratio, VSWR, and directivity. They are shown in Figure 7.165 through Figure 7. 167 along with simulated results, which have generally good agreement with measured results.
7.2.3Uniform current distribution
7.2.3.1Loading techniques
7.2.3.1.1 Monopole with top loading
The history of top-loaded antennas goes back to 1885, when Edison patented a communication system using a top-loaded antenna [80]. Hertz demonstrated electromagnetic waves in 1888 by using a dipole with large conducting plates attached to each end, which acted as a resonator with an inductance of the high-voltage-generator inductive coil. In the early days of communications, transmission of very low frequency (VLF) bands was accomplished by applying top-loading techniques to short monopoles that were subsequently adapted to LF, MF, and HF communications. In those days, most antennas

|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured |
|
||
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dB) |
7 |
|
|
|
Simulated BW = 20% |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Measured BW = 24% |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Axial |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
3 |
3.1 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
3.7 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
4 |
|
2.7 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frequency (GHz) |
|
|
|
× 109 |
Figure 7.165 Measured and simulated axial ratio ([79], copyright C 2010 IEEE).
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simulated |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
8 |
|
|
|
Simulated BW = 46% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
VSWR |
|
|
|
Measured BW = 50% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
2.9 |
3.1 |
3.3 |
3.5 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
4.5 |
4.7 |
4.9 |
5.1 |
5.3 |
5.5 |
5.7 |
5.9 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frequency (GHz) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
× 109 |
|||||
Figure 7.166 Measured and simulated VSWR ([79], copyright C 2010 IEEE). |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simulated |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dB) |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directivity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
3 |
3.1 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
3.7 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
4 |
|
|
|
||
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frequency (GHz) |
|
|
|
|
|
× 109 |
|
|
|
Figure 7.167 Measured and simulated directivity ([79], copyright C 2010 IEEE).

7.2 Design and practice of ESA |
195 |
|
|
z
b
2a
h
ϕ
r
Figure 7.168 Cross section of a disk-plate top-loaded monopole mounted on an infinite ground plane ([82], copyright C 2008 IEEE).
could be categorized as electrically small antennas and hence nowadays application of the top-loading technique to produce electrically small antenna is not necessarily new, but rather prevalent.
As an electrically small monopole has small radiation resistance and large capacitive reactance, addition of either a capacitive or inductive component to the monopole is implemented to make self-resonance and matching conditions feasible. Top loading was used as one of the most common means to realize capacitive loading on the monopole [81]. Practical inductive loading has been implemented by coil loading in the middle of a monopole element [82] and by modifying a linear monopole to either a meandered or helical wire structure.
Since top loading is effective to lower the resonance frequency, it is useful for reducing the antenna height and in turn for equivalently increasing the electrical length of a short monopole, assisting improvement of antenna performances. This increases radiation resistance and bandwidth even with the antenna of reduced size. The top loading can be ascribed to producing the uniform current distribution on the short monopole that yields significant improvements described above.
Top loading on a short monopole is implemented by a wire of L-shape (Inverted-L), T-shape, and crossed multi-elements, among others. A thin circular plate (disk) and its variations are also used as another common type of top loading. A circularly symmetric thin planar conductor top loaded on an electrically small monopole placed on the infinite ground plane shown in Figure 7.168 is representative [82]. In practice, the disk can take other forms, as Figure 7.169 illustrates: (a) wire-grid disk, (b) wired spiral, and (c) wiregrid spherical cap [83a, b]. There are of course dipole types as shown in Figure 7.169(d), where the top load is a wire grid, and also the monopole can be a meandered wire, and a helical wire as well. Figure 7.169(e) and (f) show examples of a wire-grid top-loaded helical dipole and a spherical-cap top-loaded helical dipole, respectively [83a, b].
In the planar disk model shown in Figure 7.168, currents on the monopole and the field they produce are treated as independent of the azimuthal angle ϕ. With dimensions h = 0.3 m, b = 0.6 m, and a = 6.35 mm, and the operating frequency f0 = 10 MHz,

196 |
Design and practice of small antennas I |
|
|
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
(d) |
(e) |
(f) |
Figure 7.169 (a) Wire-grid disk top-loaded monopole, (b) wired-spiral hat top-loaded monopole,
(c) wire-grid spherical-cap top-loaded monopole, (d) wire-grid disk top-loaded dipole,
(e) wire-grid top-loaded helical dipole, and (f) spherical-cap top-loaded helical dipole, ([83a, b], copyright C 2008 IEEE).
current and charge distributions on the monopole and the disk are shown in Figure 7.170 and Figure 7.171, respectively, in which the current on the monopole until h = 0.01λ is observed nearly uniform. The input impedance (= R + jX) is depicted in Figure 7.172, where both calculated and measured results are shown. Radiation power factor pe, radiation conductance Ge, and bandwidth f along with applied voltage V are illustrated as functions of the top-loaded ratio b/h in Figure 7.173 and Figure 7.174, respectively. In these figures, pe0 and Ge0, respectively, denote reference values for an antenna with b = h. The beneficial effect of top-loading is obvious from increases in bandwidth f (proportional to pe), and radiated power (proportional to Ge). Particularly the bandwidth with b/h = 5 is over 250 times as much when compared with that of b/h = 0.02, the unloaded monopole. These figures suggest that top loading is vitally important to reduce the input voltage to a tolerable level and to achieve the required bandwidth.
Another type of top-loaded monopole is an electrically small monopole simply loaded with an open-circuited transmission line shown in Figure 7.175 [84].
The input impedance Z is
Z = −jZ0 cot βb |
(7.69) |

7.2 Design and practice of ESA |
197 |
|
|
Magnitude of current in mA/V
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
L |
|
b |
λ |
||
|
|||
|
λ |
|
|
4 |
|
|
3
2
1
0
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 s/λ, distance from input in wavelength
Figure 7.170 Currents on a DLM with h = 0.3 m, b = 0.6 m, and a = 6.35 mm at 10 MHz ([82], copyright C 2008 IEEE).
Magnitude of charge in pC/V-m
1*103
b |
L |
λ |
λ |
100
10
0
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 s/λ, distance from input in wavelength
Figure 7.171 Charge distributions on the same DLM as that in Figure 7.170 ([82], copyrightC 2008 IEEE).
where Z0 denotes the characteristic impedance of the metal shell and b is its total length; that is, b = h + r. The metal shell acts as a series capacitance, by which h can be extended to the effective height h as
h = (1/β)arc cot{(Z0/Z0e) cot βb} + H |
(7.70) |

198 |
Design and practice of small antennas I |
|
|
|
1*103 |
|
|
|
X |
|
100 |
|
in ohms |
10 |
R |
Impedance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Theory |
Measured
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theory |
|
|
|
||
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
|
0.8 |
0.9 |
1 |
2πh/λ, antenna height in radians
Figure 7.172 Theoretical and measured impedance of a DLM with h = b = 0.3 m, and a = 6.36 mm ([82], copyright C 2008 IEEE).
1*103 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reference values |
|
|
|
100 |
b0 = 0.3 |
|
|
|
pe0 |
= 2.651 × 10−4 |
|
|
|
|
Ge0 |
= 5.293 × 10−7 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
pe/pe0 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Ge/Ge0 |
|
pe/pe0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
Ge/Ge0 |
|
1*10−3 |
|
0.1 |
1 |
10 |
0.01 |
|
b/h, top loading ratio
Figure 7.173 Radiation power factor (normalized) pe and radiation conductance Ge as function of b/h for a reference antenna with h = b = 0.3 m, and a = 6.35 mm ([82], copyright C 2008 IEEE).

7.2 Design and practice of ESA |
199 |
|
|
Voltage in kV and bandwidth in kHz
100
......Operating frequency |
f = 10 MHz |
Antenna height ................ |
h = 0.3 m |
Radiated power ................. |
P = 1 W |
|
|
10
1 |
|
|
|
V (kV) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f (kHz) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
0.1 |
1 |
10 |
b/h, top loading ratio
Figure 7.174 Radiation bandwidth and applied voltage as function of b/h for an antenna radiating 1 W at 10 MHz with h = 0.3 m, a = 6.35 mm ([82], copyright C 2008 IEEE).
r
h
H
εr
Figure 7.175 Open-circuit transmission line loaded monopole antenna structure ([84], copyrightC 2006 IEEE).
where Z0e is the effective characteristic impedance of the common monopole and H is the height of the monopole. The metal shell also plays a role of matching circuit. The effective height h can be increased by lengthening h and at the same time the resonance frequency f is lowered.
Effectiveness of top-loading was shown by using a wire-grid disk top-loaded dipole that had as much as about 60% reduction in the antenna size [83]. Also about the same amount of size reduction was shown with a spherical-cap top-loaded dipole [83]. The dipole antenna sizes used in these examples were 18 cm and 19 cm in the wire-grid disk