
- •Contents
- •Preface
- •Chapter 1 Introduction (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 2 Small antennas (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 3 Properties of small antennas (K. Fujimoto and Y. Kim)
- •Chapter 4 Fundamental limitation of small antennas (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 5 Subjects related with small antennas (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 6 Principles and techniques for making antennas small (H. Morishita and K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 7 Design and practice of small antennas I (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 8 Design and practice of small antennas II (K. Fujimoto)
- •Chapter 9 Evaluation of small antenna performance (H. Morishita)
- •Chapter 10 Electromagnetic simulation (H. Morishita and Y. Kim)
- •Chapter 11 Glossary (K. Fujimoto and N. T. Hung)
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Small antennas
- •3 Properties of small antennas
- •3.1 Performance of small antennas
- •3.1.1 Input impedance
- •3.1.4 Gain
- •3.2 Importance of impedance matching in small antennas
- •3.3 Problems of environmental effect in small antennas
- •4 Fundamental limitations of small antennas
- •4.1 Fundamental limitations
- •4.2 Brief review of some typical work on small antennas
- •5 Subjects related with small antennas
- •5.1 Major subjects and topics
- •5.1.1 Investigation of fundamentals of small antennas
- •5.1.2 Realization of small antennas
- •5.2 Practical design problems
- •5.3 General topics
- •6 Principles and techniques for making antennas small
- •6.1 Principles for making antennas small
- •6.2 Techniques and methods for producing ESA
- •6.2.1 Lowering the antenna resonance frequency
- •6.2.1.1 SW structure
- •6.2.1.1.1 Periodic structures
- •6.2.1.1.3 Material loading on an antenna structure
- •6.2.2 Full use of volume/space circumscribing antenna
- •6.2.3 Arrangement of current distributions uniformly
- •6.2.4 Increase of radiation modes
- •6.2.4.2 Use of conjugate structure
- •6.2.4.3 Compose with different types of antennas
- •6.2.5 Applications of metamaterials to make antennas small
- •6.2.5.1 Application of SNG to small antennas
- •6.2.5.1.1 Matching in space
- •6.2.5.1.2 Matching at the load terminals
- •6.2.5.2 DNG applications
- •6.3 Techniques and methods to produce FSA
- •6.3.1 FSA composed by integration of components
- •6.3.2 FSA composed by integration of functions
- •6.3.3 FSA of composite structure
- •6.4 Techniques and methods for producing PCSA
- •6.4.2 PCSA employing a high impedance surface
- •6.5 Techniques and methods for making PSA
- •6.5.2 Simple PSA
- •6.6 Optimization techniques
- •6.6.1 Genetic algorithm
- •6.6.2 Particle swarm optimization
- •6.6.3 Topology optimization
- •6.6.4 Volumetric material optimization
- •6.6.5 Practice of optimization
- •6.6.5.1 Outline of particle swarm optimization
- •6.6.5.2 PSO application method and result
- •7 Design and practice of small antennas I
- •7.1 Design and practice
- •7.2 Design and practice of ESA
- •7.2.1 Lowering the resonance frequency
- •7.2.1.1 Use of slow wave structure
- •7.2.1.1.1 Periodic structure
- •7.2.1.1.1.1 Meander line antennas (MLA)
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.1 Dipole-type meander line antenna
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.2 Monopole-type meander line antenna
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.3 Folded-type meander line antenna
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.4 Meander line antenna mounted on a rectangular conducting box
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.5 Small meander line antennas of less than 0.1 wavelength [13]
- •7.2.1.1.1.1.6 MLAs of length L = 0.05 λ [13, 14]
- •7.2.1.1.1.2 Zigzag antennas
- •7.2.1.1.1.3 Normal mode helical antennas (NMHA)
- •7.2.1.1.1.4 Discussions on small NMHA and meander line antennas pertaining to the antenna performances
- •7.2.1.2 Extension of current path
- •7.2.2 Full use of volume/space
- •7.2.2.1.1 Meander line
- •7.2.2.1.4 Spiral antennas
- •7.2.2.1.4.1 Equiangular spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.2 Archimedean spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.3.2 Gain
- •7.2.2.1.4.4 Radiation patterns
- •7.2.2.1.4.5 Unidirectional pattern
- •7.2.2.1.4.6 Miniaturization of spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.1 Slot spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.2 Spiral antenna loaded with capacitance
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.3 Archimedean spiral antennas
- •7.2.2.1.4.6.4 Spiral antenna loaded with inductance
- •7.2.2.2 Three-dimensional (3D) structure
- •7.2.2.2.1 Koch trees
- •7.2.2.2.2 3D spiral antenna
- •7.2.2.2.3 Spherical helix
- •7.2.2.2.3.1 Folded semi-spherical monopole antennas
- •7.2.2.2.3.2 Spherical dipole antenna
- •7.2.2.2.3.3 Spherical wire antenna
- •7.2.2.2.3.4 Spherical magnetic (TE mode) dipoles
- •7.2.2.2.3.5 Hemispherical helical antenna
- •7.2.3 Uniform current distribution
- •7.2.3.1 Loading techniques
- •7.2.3.1.1 Monopole with top loading
- •7.2.3.1.2 Cross-T-wire top-loaded monopole with four open sleeves
- •7.2.3.1.3 Slot loaded with spiral
- •7.2.4 Increase of excitation mode
- •7.2.4.1.1 L-shaped quasi-self-complementary antenna
- •7.2.4.1.2 H-shaped quasi-self-complementary antenna
- •7.2.4.1.3 A half-circular disk quasi-self-complementary antenna
- •7.2.4.1.4 Sinuous spiral antenna
- •7.2.4.2 Conjugate structure
- •7.2.4.2.1 Electrically small complementary paired antenna
- •7.2.4.2.2 A combined electric-magnetic type antenna
- •7.2.4.3 Composite structure
- •7.2.4.3.1 Slot-monopole hybrid antenna
- •7.2.4.3.2 Spiral-slots loaded with inductive element
- •7.2.5 Applications of metamaterials
- •7.2.5.1 Applications of SNG (Single Negative) materials
- •7.2.5.1.1.2 Elliptical patch antenna
- •7.2.5.1.1.3 Small loop loaded with CLL
- •7.2.5.1.2 Epsilon-Negative Metamaterials (ENG MM)
- •7.2.5.2 Applications of DNG (Double Negative Materials)
- •7.2.5.2.1 Leaky wave antenna [116]
- •7.2.5.2.3 NRI (Negative Refractive Index) TL MM antennas
- •7.2.6 Active circuit applications to impedance matching
- •7.2.6.1 Antenna matching in transmitter/receiver
- •7.2.6.2 Monopole antenna
- •7.2.6.3 Loop and planar antenna
- •7.2.6.4 Microstrip antenna
- •8 Design and practice of small antennas II
- •8.1 FSA (Functionally Small Antennas)
- •8.1.1 Introduction
- •8.1.2 Integration technique
- •8.1.2.1 Enhancement/improvement of antenna performances
- •8.1.2.1.1 Bandwidth enhancement and multiband operation
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.1 E-shaped microstrip antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.2 -shaped microstrip antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.3 H-shaped microstrip antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.1.4 S-shaped-slot patch antenna
- •8.1.2.1.1.2.1 Microstrip slot antennas
- •8.1.2.1.1.2.2.2 Rectangular patch with square slot
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.1 A printed λ/8 PIFA operating at penta-band
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.2 Bent-monopole penta-band antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.3 Loop antenna with a U-shaped tuning element for hepta-band operation
- •8.1.2.1.2.1.4 Planar printed strip monopole for eight-band operation
- •8.1.2.1.2.2.2 Folded loop antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.2 Monopole UWB antennas
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.2.1 Binomial-curved patch antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.2.2 Spline-shaped antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3 UWB antennas with slot/slit embedded on the patch surface
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3.1 A beveled square monopole patch with U-slot
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3.2 Circular/Elliptical slot UWB antennas
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.3.3 A rectangular monopole patch with a notch and a strip
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.4.1 Pentagon-shape microstrip slot antenna
- •8.1.2.1.2.3.4.2 Sectorial loop antenna (SLA)
- •8.1.3 Integration of functions into antenna
- •8.2 Design and practice of PCSA (Physically Constrained Small Antennas)
- •8.2.2 Application of HIS (High Impedance Surface)
- •8.2.3 Applications of EBG (Electromagnetic Band Gap)
- •8.2.3.1 Miniaturization
- •8.2.3.2 Enhancement of gain
- •8.2.3.3 Enhancement of bandwidth
- •8.2.3.4 Reduction of mutual coupling
- •8.2.4 Application of DGS (Defected Ground Surface)
- •8.2.4.2 Multiband circular disk monopole patch antenna
- •8.2.5 Application of DBE (Degenerated Band Edge) structure
- •8.3 Design and practice of PSA (Physically Small Antennas)
- •8.3.1 Small antennas for radio watch/clock systems
- •8.3.2 Small antennas for RFID
- •8.3.2.1 Dipole and monopole types
- •8.3.2.3 Slot type antennas
- •8.3.2.4 Loop antenna
- •Appendix I
- •Appendix II
- •References
- •9 Evaluation of small antenna performance
- •9.1 General
- •9.2 Practical method of measurement
- •9.2.1 Measurement by using a coaxial cable
- •9.2.2 Method of measurement by using small oscillator
- •9.2.3 Method of measurement by using optical system
- •9.3 Practice of measurement
- •9.3.1 Input impedance and bandwidth
- •9.3.2 Radiation patterns and gain
- •10 Electromagnetic simulation
- •10.1 Concept of electromagnetic simulation
- •10.2 Typical electromagnetic simulators for small antennas
- •10.3 Example (balanced antennas for mobile handsets)
- •10.3.2 Antenna structure
- •10.3.3 Analytical results
- •10.3.4 Simulation for characteristics of a folded loop antenna in the vicinity of human head and hand
- •10.3.4.1 Structure of human head and hand
- •10.3.4.2 Analytical results
- •11 Glossary
- •11.1 Catalog of small antennas
- •11.2 List of small antennas
- •Index

158 |
Design and practice of small antennas I |
|
|
(a)
Real (Zin) Ω
(b)
Imag (Zin) Ω
300
Experiment
Simulation
200
100
30
1 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
f (GHz)
Experiment
Simulation
100
0
−100
1 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
f (GHz)
Figure 7.110 Input impedance of a five-order Sierpinsky monopole: (a) real part and (b) imaginary part (solid line: measured, dashed line; simulated by using FDTD, and dashed-dotted line; simulated by using DOTIG4 ([47], copyright C 2003 IEEE).
Input impedances are given in Figure 7.110, where (a) shows resistance and (b) shows reactance.
7.2.2.1.4 Spiral antennas
Antenna performances of dipoles and loops generally depend on the frequency; however, there are some antennas like self-complementary antennas which have frequencyindependent characteristics. Other types, such as spiral antennas also have frequencyindependent characteristics. The antenna structure is essentially determined by angle, not length, with which the antenna exhibits constant impedance characteristics. Ideally the spiral antenna of infinite structure is frequency independent; however, a practical antenna cannot have infinite structure, the frequency dependence on its impedance being limited by the finite structure; that is, the outer length of spiral curve and the impedance becomes constant over the frequency higher than that determined by the outer spiral length. Two types of spiral antenna are representative: equiangular spiral antenna and Archimedean spiral antenna.
7.2.2.1.4.1 Equiangular spiral antenna
The basic equiangular spiral curve shown in Figure 7.111 is expressed by
r = r0eaϕ |
(7.60) |

7.2 Design and practice of ESA |
159 |
|
|
y
r
φ
x
Figure 7.111 Equiangular spiral curve ([48]).
|
δ |
|
|
|
Edge 1 |
|
|
|
|
r1 |
r1 |
|
|
|
R |
|
|
||
r4 |
|
|
|
|
r3 |
|
|
|
|
Edge 2 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
(b) |
= |
|
|
Figure 7.112 (a) Planar equiangular spiral antenna (self-complementary case with δ |
90◦ ([48]) |
|||
|
and (b) a conical equiangular spiral structure.
where r0 denotes radius for ϕ = 0, and a is a constant controlling the flare rate of the spiral [48]. The spiral in the figure is right-handed, but left-handed spirals can be generated using negative values of a, or simply turning the spiral in the opposite direction. A planar equiangular spiral antenna is created by using the equiangular spiral curve shown in Figure 7.112 (a). Each edge of the spiral element has a curve basically expressed by (7.60). For instance, r1 = r0eaϕ , r2 is the curve rotated through angle δ, so r2 = r0 ea(ϕ –δ ), r3 has the curve of δ = π , then r3 = r0ea(ϕ –π ), and r4 is the curve further turned from r3, so r4 = r0ea(ϕ –π –δ ).
Figure 7.112(b) depicts a conical equiangular spiral structure.
The flare rate a is more conveniently expressed by using expansion factor ε, which is
ε = r(ϕ + 2π )/r(ϕ) = r0ea(ϕ+2π )/r0eaϕ = ea2π . |
(7.61) |
A typical value for ε is 4, and then a = 0.221. The upper frequency fu is determined by the feed structure. The minimum radius r0 is about λ/4 at fu for ε = 4. A nearly

160 |
Design and practice of small antennas I |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 7.113 (a) A circular type Archimedean spiral antenna and (b) a square type Archimedean spiral structure.
equivalent criterion is a circumference in the feed region of 2π r0 = λu = c/fu. The lowest frequency fL is set by overall radius R, which is roughly λL/4 (λL = c/fL), and the circumference C of a circle, which encloses the entire spiral, is used to set fL by taking C = 2π R = λL. When a = 0.221, R is r(ϕ = 3π ) = r0 e0.221(3π ) = 8.03 r0 and equals λL/4. Meanwhile, r0 equals λu/4, then, the bandwidth defined by λL/λu = 8.03, meaning about 8:1 bandwidth.
7.2.2.1.4.2 Archimedean spiral antenna
Figure 7.113 illustrates the planar Archimedean spiral antenna [48], having two spiral curves, which are linearly proportional to the polar angle rather than exponential for the equiangular spiral, represented by
r = r0(1 + ϕ/π ) and r0(1 + ϕ/π − p). |
(7.62) |
The outside circumference in this case is one wavelength (a half wavelength for the outer half-circle) and an antenna with three turns is shown in Figure 7.113(a). Since the radiated fields produced by the two spirals are orthogonal, equal in magnitude, and 90 degrees phase difference, the wave is left-hand circular polarization (LHCP). The lefthand winding of the spiral determines the left-hand sense in the wave, which is viewed as radiation out of the page, and the opposite sense of wave is viewed as radiation toward the other side of page, that is RHCP.
Figure 7.113(b) illustrates a square Archimedean spiral modified from circular type. The spiral produces a broad main beam perpendicular to the plane of the spiral; however, in many practical applications, a unidirectional beam is preferred. This suggests the use of a ground plane or cavity, over which the spiral is placed. The latter is called a cavity-backed spiral antenna. Since by using metallic material for the cavity, it is natural that the frequency performance is altered, leading to use of absorbing material loaded
into the cavity to reduce the frequency variation.
The typical performance parameters for a cavity-backed Archimedean spiral antenna are HP (Half power beamwidth) = 75◦, |AR| = 1 dB, G = 5 dB over 10:1 bandwidth or more [48]. The input impedance is approximately 120resistive.

Rout
7.2 Design and practice of ESA |
161 |
|
|
|
|
y
z x
ψ
R in
Figure 7.114
IEEE).
|
300 |
|
(Ω) |
250 |
|
200 |
||
Resistance |
||
150 |
||
|
||
|
100 |
|
|
50 |
|
|
0 |
Geometry of truncated two-arm equiangular spiral antenna ([49], copyright C 2007
Measured
FDTD
εr ≈ 1
εr = 6.15
0.5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Frequency
Figure 7.115 Measured and FDTD simulated resistance for antenna type A and B ([49], copyrightC 2007 IEEE).
7.2.2.1.4.3 Antenna performance and design of spiral antenna 7.2.2.1.4.3.1 Input impedance
A model considered here is depicted in Figure 7.114 [49], which shows major design parameters Rin, Rout, and . Here two cases, A and B, where a spiral element is embedded on two different substrates, are treated. The dimensional parameters (see Fig. 7.114) are Rin = 3 mm, Rout = 0.114 m, = 79◦. The antenna type A uses substrate modeled as a 0.1 mm polyester film layer εr = 3.2 on top of a foam layer εr = 1, while the antenna type B uses substrate modeled as a uniform dielectric with a thickness of 1.27 mm and εr = 6.15. Input impedances measured and calculated by using FDTD simulator are depicted in Figure 7.115, showing resistance, and Figure 7.116(a) and (b), showing reactance for the type A and the type B, respectively. Impedance characteristics tend to show peculiar behavior having three distinct regions. The outer truncation of the spiral curve dominates the performance in low-frequency regions, the inner truncation determines that in higher-frequency behavior, and the shape of the spiral curve itself relates to that of the intermediate-frequency regions. There is a region where a band of nearly constant impedance is seen between the erratic behavior at the upper and lower frequencies. This is the specific behavior of the spiral antenna as a frequency-independent antenna and this region is referred to as the “operating band.” The input impedance Z in this region is 188 , when the spiral has self-complementary

162 |
Design and practice of small antennas I |
|
|
(a) 100
Ω) |
|
( |
0 |
reactance |
|
|
50 |
Foamclad |
−50 |
|
|
|
−100 |
|
|
Measured |
(b) |
100 |
|
Measured |
|
||
|
|
) |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
FDTD |
|
j Ω |
50 |
|
FDTD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reactance |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rogers |
−50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
−100 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
.5 |
|||||||||
|
f (GHz) |
|
|
|
|
Frequency (GHz) |
|
|
Figure 7.116 Measured and FDTD simulated reactance: (a) for type A and (b) for type B ([49], copyright C 2007 IEEE).
|
250 |
|
|
(W) |
200 |
εr = 1.3 |
|
impedance |
|||
150 |
εr = 2.9 |
||
100 |
εr = 6.2 |
||
|
|||
|
|
||
Real |
50 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
0 |
1010 |
|
|
109 |
Frequency (Hz)
Figure 7.117 Real impedance of spirals designed to be 188 , 148 , and 108 (triangular markers denote the edges of the operating band) ([49], copyright C 2007 IEEE).
structure [50], which is given by
Z = (1/2)Z0 = (1/2) μ0/ε0 (7.63)
where Z0 is the free space impedance. When the antenna is embedded on the substrate of εr, the impedance Z is given by using effective permittivity εeff as
Z = (1/2) |
|
= (1/2) |
|
= (1/2)Z0/√ |
|
. |
(7.64) |
|
|
||||||
μ0/εeff |
μ0/εr ε0 |
εr |
The impedance as a function of frequency is illustrated in Figure 7.117, which is calculated for the spiral of type A on the substrate of thickness of 1.27 mm with different εeff = 1.3, 2.9, and 6.2. The lower-frequency region is dominated by a series of resonant peaks, the middle-frequency region is approximately constant, and higher-frequency regions contain either a resonant peak or a region where the real impedance decreases with frequency. In the figure, marker arrows denote the edge of the operating band and the dashed lines show the calculated characteristic impedance, which is the average in the operating band. The spiral impedance can be evaluated numerically over the range