- •Table of Contents
- •Foreword
- •OECD Journal on Budgeting
- •Board of Advisors
- •Preface
- •Executive Summary
- •Sharp differences exist in the legal framework for budget systems
- •Public finance and legal theories do not explain inter-country differences in budget system laws
- •Political variables and legal culture help explain the inter-country differences
- •Norms for budget systems have been issued and many should be in budget system laws
- •Budget system laws are adopted to strengthen the powers of the legislature or the executive
- •Country studies reveal a multiplicity of reasons for adopting budget-related laws
- •Conclusions
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Budget processes
- •2.1. Budgeting: a five-stage process
- •Figure I.1. The roles of Parliament and the executive in the budget cycle
- •2.2. How are the different legal frameworks for budget systems organised?
- •Figure I.2. Different models for organising the legal framework of budget systems
- •3. Can economic theory explain the differences?
- •3.1. New institutional economics
- •3.2. Law, economics and public choice theory
- •3.3. Constitutional political economy: budgetary rules and budgetary outcomes
- •3.4. Can game theory help?
- •4. Can comparative law explain the differences?
- •4.1. Families of legal systems and the importance of the constitution
- •Box I.2. Purposes of constitutions and characteristics of statutes
- •4.2. Absence of norms for constitutions partly explains differences in budget system laws
- •4.3. Hierarchy within primary law also partly explains differences in budget-related laws
- •Box I.3. Hierarchy of laws: The example of Spain
- •4.4. Not all countries complete all steps of formal law-making processes
- •Box I.4. Steps in making law
- •4.5. Greater use is made of secondary law in some countries
- •Table I.1. Delegated legislation and separation of powers
- •4.6. Decisions and regulations of the legislature are particularly important in some countries
- •4.8. Are laws “green lights” or “red lights”?
- •5. Forms of government and budget system laws
- •5.1. Constitutional or parliamentary monarchies
- •5.2. Presidential and semi-presidential governments
- •5.3. Parliamentary republics
- •5.4. Relationship between forms of government and budget system law
- •Table I.2. Differences in selected budgetary powers of the executive and the legislature
- •Figure I.3. Separation of powers and the need to adopt budget-related laws
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Introduction
- •Figure II.1. Density of legal framework for budget systems in 25 OECD countries
- •Table II.1. Legal frameworks for budget systems: 13 OECD countries
- •2. Different purposes of the legal frameworks for budget systems
- •Box II.1. Purposes of budget system laws
- •2.1. Legal necessity?
- •Figure II.2. Budget reforms and changes in budget laws
- •2.2. Budget reform: when is law required?
- •2.3. Elaborating on the budget powers of the legislature vis-à-vis the executive
- •3. Differences in the legal framework for the main actors in budget systems
- •3.1. Legislatures
- •3.2. Executives
- •Box II.2. New Zealand’s State Sector Act 1988
- •3.3. Judiciary
- •3.4. External audit offices
- •Table II.3. External audit legal frameworks: Selected differences
- •3.5. Sub-national governments
- •3.6. Supra-national bodies and international organisations
- •4. Differences in the legal framework for budget processes
- •4.1. Budget preparation by the executive
- •Table II.4. Legal requirements for the date of submission of the budget to the legislature
- •Box II.3. France: Legal requirements for budget information
- •4.2. Parliamentary approval of the budget
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting systems
- •Box II.4. Finland: Legal requirements for annual report and annual accounts
- •Table II.5. Legal requirements for submission of annual report to the legislature: Selected countries
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Have standards for the legal framework of budget systems been drawn up?
- •1.1. Normative and positive approaches to budget law
- •1.2. Limited guidance from normative constitutional economics
- •2. Who should set and monitor legally binding standards?
- •2.1. Role of politicians and bureaucrats
- •2.2. International transmission of budget system laws
- •2.3. International organisations as standard setters
- •Box III.1. The OECD Best Practices for Budget Transparency
- •Box III.2. Constitutional norms for external audit: Extracts from the INTOSAI “Lima Declaration”
- •2.4. Monitoring standards
- •3. Principles to support the legal framework of budget systems
- •Box III.3. Ten principles for a budget law
- •3.1. Authoritativeness
- •Table III.1. Stages of the budget cycle and legal instruments
- •3.2. Annual basis
- •3.3. Universality
- •3.4. Unity
- •3.5. Specificity
- •3.6. Balance
- •3.7. Accountability
- •Box III.4. Possible minimum legal norms for budget reporting
- •Box III.5. Ingredients of legal norms for external audit
- •3.8. Transparency
- •Box III.6. Ingredients of legal norms for government agencies
- •3.9. Stability or predictability
- •3.10. Performance (or efficiency, economy, and effectiveness)
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •Box 1. Canada: Main budget system laws
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system laws
- •Box 2. Canada: Main provisions of the Spending Control Act 1992
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and the powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The executive and the legislature
- •3.2. Roles and responsibilities of sub-national governments
- •Box 3. Canada: Major transfers from the federal to the provincial governments
- •4. Legal provisions for each stage of the budget cycle
- •4.1. Budget preparation and presentation by the executive
- •Box 4. Canada: Key steps in the annual budgeting process
- •Box 5. Canada: Major contents of the main estimates
- •4.2. Budget process in Parliament
- •Box 6. Canada: The budget approval process in Parliament
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
- •4.5. External audit
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •Box 1. France: Main budget system laws
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system laws
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and the powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The executive and the legislature
- •3.2. Role and responsibilities of sub-national governments
- •Box 3. France: Key features of the Local Government Code
- •4. Legal provisions for each stage of the budget cycle
- •4.1. Budget preparation and presentation by the executive
- •4.2. Budget process in Parliament
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
- •4.5. External audit
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •Box 1. Germany: Main budget system laws
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system laws
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and the powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The executive and the legislature
- •Box 2. Germany: Public agencies
- •3.2. Role and responsibilities of sub-national governments
- •4. Legal provisions for each stage of the budget cycle
- •4.1. Budget preparation and presentation by the executive
- •4.2. Budget process in Parliament
- •Box 3. Germany: Budget processes in Parliament
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
- •4.5. External audit17
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •Box 1. Japan: Main budget system laws
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system laws
- •Box 2. Japan: Main contents of the 1997 Fiscal Structural Reform Act
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and the powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The executive and the legislature
- •3.2. Role and responsibilities of sub-national governments
- •Box 3. Japan: Grants from central government to local governments
- •4. Legal provisions for each stage of the budget cycle
- •4.1. Budget preparation and presentation by the executive
- •Box 4. Japan: The timetable for the budget process
- •Box 5. Japan: Additional documents attached to the draft budget
- •4.2. Budget process in Parliament
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
- •4.5. External audit
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •Box 1. Korea: Main budget system laws
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system laws
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and the powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The executive and the legislature
- •3.2. Role and responsibilities of sub-national governments
- •Box 3. Korea: Major acts governing the fiscal relationship across government levels
- •4. Legal provisions for each stage of the budget cycle
- •4.1. Budget preparation and presentation by the executive
- •Box 4. Korea: Legal requirements for the timetable for budget preparation and deliberation
- •Box 5. Korea: Other documents annexed to the draft budget
- •4.2. Budget process in Parliament
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
- •4.5. External audit
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system laws
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and the powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The executive and the legislature
- •3.2. Role and responsibilities of sub-national governments
- •4. Legal provisions for each stage of the budget cycle
- •4.1. Budget preparation and presentation by the executive
- •Box 2. New Zealand: Fiscal responsibility (legal provisions)
- •Box 3. New Zealand: Key steps and dates for budget preparation by the government
- •Box 4. New Zealand: Information required to support the first appropriation act
- •4.2. Budget process in Parliament
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
- •4.5. External audit
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •Box 1. Nordic Countries: The main budget system laws or near-laws
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system laws
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The constitutions of the four countries
- •Table 1. Nordic countries: Age and size of constitutions
- •3.2. Legislatures
- •Table 2. Nordic countries: Constitutional provisions for the legislatures
- •3.3. The political executive
- •Table 3. Nordic countries: Constitutional provisions for the political executive
- •3.4. Ministries and executive agencies
- •3.5. Civil service
- •3.6. Sub-national governments
- •4. Constitutional and other legal requirements for budgeting
- •4.1. Authority of Parliament
- •Table 4. Nordic countries: Constitutional provisions for the authority of Parliament
- •4.2. Timing of submission of the annual budget
- •4.3. Non-adoption of the annual budget before the year begins
- •4.4. Content of the budget and types of appropriations
- •4.5. Documents to accompany the draft budget law
- •4.6. Parliamentary committees and budget procedures in Parliament
- •4.7. Parliamentary amendment powers, coalition agreements, two-stage budgeting and fiscal rules
- •4.8. Supplementary budgets
- •4.10. Cancellation of appropriations and contingency funds
- •4.11. Government accounting
- •4.12. Other fiscal reporting and special reports
- •Table 5. Nordic countries: Constitutional requirements for external audit
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •Box 1. Spain: Main budget system laws
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system laws
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and the powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The executive and the legislature
- •3.2. Role and responsibilities of sub-national governments
- •4. Legal provisions for each stage of the budget cycle
- •4.1. Budget preparation and presentation by the executive
- •Box 2. Spain: The timetable for the budget process (based on the fiscal year 2003)
- •Box 3. Spain: The major content of medium-term budget plans
- •Box 4. Spain: Additional documents attached to the draft budget
- •4.2. Budget process in Parliament
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
- •4.5. External audit
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •Box 1. United Kingdom: Main budget system laws
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system law
- •Box 2. United Kingdom: Reforms of the budget system in the past 20 years
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and the powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The executive and the legislature
- •Box 3. United Kingdom: Executive agencies and other bodies
- •3.2. Role and responsibilities of sub-national governments
- •4. Legal provisions for each stage of the budget cycle
- •4.1. Budget preparation and presentation by the executive
- •4.2. Budget process in Parliament
- •Box 4. United Kingdom: Budget processes in Parliament
- •Table 1. United Kingdom: Format of appropriation adopted by Parliament for Department X
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •Table 2. United Kingdom: Transfers of budgetary authority
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
- •4.5. External audit
- •Box 5. United Kingdom: External audit arrangements
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •Box 1. United States: Main federal budget system laws
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system laws
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and the powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The executive and the legislature
- •3.2. Role and responsibilities of sub-national governments
- •Box 3. United States: Major transfers between different levels of government
- •4. Legal provisions for each stage of the budget cycle
- •4.1. Budget preparation and presentation by the executive
- •Box 4. United States: Key steps in the annual budget process within the executive
- •Box 5. United States: Other information required by law
- •4.2. Budget process in the legislature
- •Box 6. United States: Legal and internal deadlines for congressional budget approval
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
- •4.5. External audit
- •5. Sanctions and non-compliance
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
IV. UNITED STATES
adopted in the House, it is deemed to have been a vote in favour of a joint resolution setting the statutory limit at the level specified in the budget resolution. The joint resolution is transmitted to the Senate for further action, where it may be amended. Once it passes both houses, it is sent to the President for his signature. In 2003, such debt-limit legislation was enacted, increasing the debt limit to $7.4 trillion.
4.2.8. Promulgation, veto and publication of the adopted budget
Promulgation and publication of the budgetary laws adopted by the Congress is made as the President signs the appropriations, tax and other spending bills. The President has two options when presented with bills. He may either sign the bill in its entirety or veto it in its entirety. If he vetoes the bill, the Congress may override the veto by a two-thirds majority in each house. The President has no authority to delete particular spending items from bills while permitting the remainder of the bill to remain (no line-item veto).
4.2.9. Supplementary budgets (rectifying laws)
At any time during the year, the President may submit to Congress proposals for supplementary appropriations that are deemed necessary because of laws enacted after the submission of the budget or that are in the public interest. The President must include the reasons for the proposed changes and explain why the proposed appropriations were not included in the budget (Title 31, s. 1107). For example, in 2003, two supplementary appropriations acts were passed, in March and in October, largely to finance the war and occupation in Iraq and ongoing military involvement in Afghanistan.
4.3. Budget execution
Part of the legal framework for governing whether an agency implements the enacted appropriations according to the intent of Congress is provided in the Anti-deficiency Act, now embodied in Title 31. This law contains provisions incorporated into appropriations laws over the years relating to matters such as prohibited activities, the apportionment system, and budgetary reserves. These provisions continue to play a pivotal role in the execution of the federal budget. The CFOA and the GPRA are key laws aiming at improving performance and effectiveness.
4.3.1. Apportionment of expenditure authority
Once the appropriations are enacted, funds are not available to agencies until the OMB releases budgetary resources to departments and agencies by an apportionment process, outlined in Title 31 (ss. 1501-1558). This law
OECD JOURNAL ON BUDGETING – VOLUME 4 – NO. 3 – ISSN 1608-7143 – © OECD 2004 |
467 |
|
IV. UNITED STATES
requires appropriations to be apportioned by periods within the fiscal year or among categories (s. 1512). Generally apportionments by time period are done in quarterly instalments. An apportionment may be divided and subdivided administratively (into allotments and sub-allotments respectively) within the limits of the apportionment (s. 1514). An appropriation should be apportioned in writing no later than the later of the following (s. 1513):
●For the legislative and judicial branches, 30 days before the beginning of the fiscal year or 30 days after the date of enactment of the law by which the appropriation is made available.
●For departments and agencies, 40 days before the beginning of the fiscal year or 15 days after the date of enactment of the law by which the appropriation is made available.
4.3.2. Cancellation of budget authority and other in-year expenditure controls
The Impoundment Control Act of 1974 requires the President to inform Congress whenever an executive branch officer intends to defer spending or not to spend the funds at all. The act defines a deferral as withholding or delaying the obligations or expenditures of budget authority. Under the act, whenever the President proposes to defer any budget authority, he is required to transmit a report to the Congress of the amounts, the programme and account affected, the estimated fiscal and programme impact, and the length of time the funds are to be deferred. The President may not defer funds beyond the end of the fiscal year nor for a duration that would cause the budget authority to lapse or prevent the agency from spending the money prudently (s. 1013). Deferral is only permissible to provide for contingencies, to achieve savings made possible by or through changes in requirements or greater efficiency of operations, or as specifically provided by law. The President may not use the deferral power to change budgetary policies.19
The act (s. 1102) also specifies rules on a rescission – the cancellation of budget authority. Unlike the deferral of budget authority that occurs unless Congress acts to disapprove the deferral, rescission occurs only if Congress enacts the rescission. The President may propose a rescission by submitting a message to Congress specifying the amount to be rescinded, the reasons, accounts and programmes involved, and the estimated budgetary and programme impacts. After receiving the message, Congress has 45 days during which it may consider a bill rescinding all, part, or none of the funds. If Congress does not rescind the budget resources by the end of the 45-day period, the President must make the funds available to meet the obligation (s. 1017). The act authorises the Comptroller General to review each impoundment message and notify Congress concerning the accuracy of the
468 |
OECD JOURNAL ON BUDGETING – VOLUME 4 – NO. 3 – ISSN 1608-7143 – © OECD 2004 |
|
IV. UNITED STATES
information, the legal status of the impoundment, and the probable impacts (s. 1014). He/she may compel the release of any impounded funds.
4.3.3. Emergency spending, excess spending and contingency funds
Title 31 provides the legal basis for emergency spending and contingency funds. In apportioning or re-apportioning an appropriation, a reserve fund may be established only as specifically provided by law (Chapter 15, s. 1512), i.e. to provide for contingencies or to achieve savings made possible by greater efficiency of operations. An established reserve fund may be changed if necessary to carry out the scope and objectives of the appropriation concerned, and be reported to Congress as provided in the Impoundment Control Act of 1974.
4.3.4. Transfer and virement of appropriations within the year
The executive has very limited discretion to change any line item of the approved budget: Congress is quite specific when it adopts the appropriations acts. Transfers between the 1 000 or so accounts require congressional approval. In rare cases, Congress has granted transfer authority to certain entities. For example, the Department of Defence may transfer up to 10% from one account to another, within the Department. Transfers between programmes within an account (reprogramming) take place. Congress generally writes into appropriations acts the rules for reprogramming, which is allowed only up to small amounts. These are often as low as a few hundred thousand dollars (Blöndal et al., 2003). Congress requires reports of re-programmings.
4.3.5. Cash planning and management of government assets and debt
Title 31 specifies the legal foundations for treasury functions by the Department of Treasury (Chapter 3). Under this authority, one of the Treasury’s main responsibilities is to manage the public finances of the government. It keeps public money, and endorses warrants for receipts for money deposited in the Treasury (s. 3301). The Financial Management Service (FMS), established under the Treasury, is the primary disburser of payments on behalf of federal agencies (for example, payments to businesses for goods and services provided to the federal government, benefit payments paid by the Social Security Administration, federal income tax refunds). The FMS also prepares daily cash plans for federal government receipts and payments (Title 31, Chapter 3).
The management of public debt is governed by Title 31. With the approval of the President, the Secretary of the Treasury may borrow amounts necessary for expenditures authorised by law, may issue government bonds for the amounts borrowed, and may buy, redeem, and make refunds (s. 3111). The
OECD JOURNAL ON BUDGETING – VOLUME 4 – NO. 3 – ISSN 1608-7143 – © OECD 2004 |
469 |
|
IV. UNITED STATES
Secretary may issue bonds to the public and to government accounts at any annual interest rate and prescribe conditions (s. 3121). On or before 1st June of each year, the Secretary of the Treasury is required to submit a report to the Ways and Means Committee of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Finance of the Senate, on the Treasury’s public debt activities and the operations of the Federal Financing Bank (s. 3130).
4.3.6. Internal audit
In the 1990s, Congress adopted several laws to strengthen internal control and audit, including the CFOA, the Government Management Reform Act (GMRA) 1994, the Federal Financial Management Improvement Act (FFMIA) 1996, as well as the GPRA. These laws are in addition to the FMFIA, which recognised that strong internal controls and accounting systems help ensure the proper use of funds and resources, compliance with statues and regulations, and protects federal programmes against fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement. The CFOA is the main act governing internal audit. It requires a chief financial officer to provide reports on the results of its investigations to both the agency head and to Congress. The Act also requires auditable financial statements to be prepared by all agencies using federal accounting standards. The FFMIA highlights the need for adequate financial systems. Moreover, the IGA established an Office of Inspectors General in each agency as an independent oversight office with the aim of strengthening oversight of controls by agencies.
4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
4.4.1. The accounting framework
Title 31 requires that the Comptroller General prescribes the accounting principles, standards, and requirements that heads of each executive agency observe (Chapter 35). Before prescribing the principles, standards, and requirements, the Comptroller General is required to consult with the Secretary of the Treasury and the President on accounting, financial reporting, and budgetary needs (s. 3511). Accordingly, the Comptroller General, the Secretary, and the Director of the OMB conduct a continuous programme for improving accounting and financial reporting in the government, and in 1990, they jointly established the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board to recommend comprehensive accounting principles specific to the federal government.
Different accounting standards are applied to financial statements and the budget of the federal government. Financial statements are produced based on a full accrual basis (OECD, 2003). The CFOA spearheaded this development. It requires that agency’s trust funds, revolving funds and
470 |
OECD JOURNAL ON BUDGETING – VOLUME 4 – NO. 3 – ISSN 1608-7143 – © OECD 2004 |
|
IV. UNITED STATES
commercial activities be covered by accrual financial statements. The GMRA extended the requirement for accrual-based financial statements to all activities of the agencies covered by the CFOA, and required that annual government-wide financial statements be prepared on an accrual basis starting with the fiscal year 1997-98.
The federal budget, however, is obligations-based, and budgetary accounting by OMB reports both on obligations incurred against budget authority and on cash payments and receipts (IMF, 2003). Most transactions are recorded on a cash basis. Accruals have been adopted for a few specific transactions such as interest on government debt held by the public, most charges to agencies for employee pension plans, and the cost of loan programmes (as provided in the Credit Reform Act 1990).
4.4.2. Government banking arrangements
Under federal statute, Federal Reserve Banks act as fiscal agents and depositaries as directed by the Secretary of the Treasury.20 These banks maintain the Treasury’s accounts and accept deposits of federal taxes and other federal agency receipts. Most federal revenues paid to the Treasury are first deposited by individuals and corporations into commercial banks, which promptly credit them to the accounts of the Treasury. Treasury, in turn, ensures that the moneys are transferred to its accounts in the Federal Reserve Banks. With the main exceptions of the Department of Defence and overseas embassies, all federal government financial transactions pass through the Treasury’s main account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
4.4.3. In-year reporting to the legislature
The law (Title 31, s. 1106) requires the President to send a report to Congress updating the budget estimates before 16 July. The budget summary includes:
●For that fiscal year, substantial changes in estimates of expenditures (both obligations and cash) and receipts after submission of the budget and other information that the President decides it is advisable to provide to Congress.
●For the four fiscal years following the fiscal year for which the budget is submitted, information on estimated expenditures for programmes authorised to continue in future years or that are considered mandatory under the law.
●For future fiscal years, information on estimated expenditures of balances carried over from the current fiscal year.
These mid-year budget updates are prepared by the OMB. In August of each year, the CBO also prepares a mid term update, the budget and economic outlook, pursuant to the requirement in s. 202(e) of the CBA for the CBO to
OECD JOURNAL ON BUDGETING – VOLUME 4 – NO. 3 – ISSN 1608-7143 – © OECD 2004 |
471 |
|
IV. UNITED STATES
provide periodic updates to the Senate and House Budget Committees. CBO methodology and assumptions are used for this report.
Whenever congressional budget committees need budget information, the OMB, the Treasury, and federal government agencies are obliged to provide it, following the provisions of Title 31, s. 1113. As a matter of course, the federal government publishes comprehensive reports on budget implementation. For example, the Treasury Department publishes a monthly report on total revenue and expenses within three weeks after the end of each month. This report compares total cumulative monthly receipts and outlays with the same period of the previous year.
4.4.4. Annual accounts and reports
The CFOA and subsequent amendments provides the framework for financial reporting for federal agencies. Agencies are required to prepare several financial statements annually including a balance sheet, a statement of operations or net costs, and a reconciliation with budget information. Agencies must undergo an annual audit by an independent entity, which reviews both the statements as well as underlying internal controls, and renders an opinion on the statements and controls.
After considering these, Treasury prepares a set of financial statements for the entire federal government audited by the GAO. Title 31 requires that the Secretary of the Treasury, not later than 31 March, in co-ordination with the Director of the OMB, submits to the President and the Congress an annual audited financial statement for the preceding fiscal year, covering all accounts and associated activities of the executive branch [s. 331(e)(1)]. The financial statement reflects the overall financial position, including assets and liabilities, and results of operations of the executive branch, and is prepared in accordance with the form and content requirements set forth by the Director of OMB. Furthermore, the Comptroller General shall audit the financial statement [s. 331(e)(2)].
Accordingly, the Secretary of the Treasury has published consolidated financial statements for the past six years audited by the GAO. The Financial Report of the United States Government provides, on an accrual basis of accounting, a comprehensive view of the federal government’s finances. It states the government’s financial position and condition, its revenues and costs, assets and liabilities, and other obligations and commitments. It also discusses important issues and conditions that may significantly affect future operations. The consolidated financial report is generally published prior to 15 December, which is 75 days after year-end rather than the six months after year-end as required by statute (IMF, 2003).
472 |
OECD JOURNAL ON BUDGETING – VOLUME 4 – NO. 3 – ISSN 1608-7143 – © OECD 2004 |
|