- •Table of Contents
- •Foreword
- •OECD Journal on Budgeting
- •Board of Advisors
- •Preface
- •Executive Summary
- •Sharp differences exist in the legal framework for budget systems
- •Public finance and legal theories do not explain inter-country differences in budget system laws
- •Political variables and legal culture help explain the inter-country differences
- •Norms for budget systems have been issued and many should be in budget system laws
- •Budget system laws are adopted to strengthen the powers of the legislature or the executive
- •Country studies reveal a multiplicity of reasons for adopting budget-related laws
- •Conclusions
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Budget processes
- •2.1. Budgeting: a five-stage process
- •Figure I.1. The roles of Parliament and the executive in the budget cycle
- •2.2. How are the different legal frameworks for budget systems organised?
- •Figure I.2. Different models for organising the legal framework of budget systems
- •3. Can economic theory explain the differences?
- •3.1. New institutional economics
- •3.2. Law, economics and public choice theory
- •3.3. Constitutional political economy: budgetary rules and budgetary outcomes
- •3.4. Can game theory help?
- •4. Can comparative law explain the differences?
- •4.1. Families of legal systems and the importance of the constitution
- •Box I.2. Purposes of constitutions and characteristics of statutes
- •4.2. Absence of norms for constitutions partly explains differences in budget system laws
- •4.3. Hierarchy within primary law also partly explains differences in budget-related laws
- •Box I.3. Hierarchy of laws: The example of Spain
- •4.4. Not all countries complete all steps of formal law-making processes
- •Box I.4. Steps in making law
- •4.5. Greater use is made of secondary law in some countries
- •Table I.1. Delegated legislation and separation of powers
- •4.6. Decisions and regulations of the legislature are particularly important in some countries
- •4.8. Are laws “green lights” or “red lights”?
- •5. Forms of government and budget system laws
- •5.1. Constitutional or parliamentary monarchies
- •5.2. Presidential and semi-presidential governments
- •5.3. Parliamentary republics
- •5.4. Relationship between forms of government and budget system law
- •Table I.2. Differences in selected budgetary powers of the executive and the legislature
- •Figure I.3. Separation of powers and the need to adopt budget-related laws
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Introduction
- •Figure II.1. Density of legal framework for budget systems in 25 OECD countries
- •Table II.1. Legal frameworks for budget systems: 13 OECD countries
- •2. Different purposes of the legal frameworks for budget systems
- •Box II.1. Purposes of budget system laws
- •2.1. Legal necessity?
- •Figure II.2. Budget reforms and changes in budget laws
- •2.2. Budget reform: when is law required?
- •2.3. Elaborating on the budget powers of the legislature vis-à-vis the executive
- •3. Differences in the legal framework for the main actors in budget systems
- •3.1. Legislatures
- •3.2. Executives
- •Box II.2. New Zealand’s State Sector Act 1988
- •3.3. Judiciary
- •3.4. External audit offices
- •Table II.3. External audit legal frameworks: Selected differences
- •3.5. Sub-national governments
- •3.6. Supra-national bodies and international organisations
- •4. Differences in the legal framework for budget processes
- •4.1. Budget preparation by the executive
- •Table II.4. Legal requirements for the date of submission of the budget to the legislature
- •Box II.3. France: Legal requirements for budget information
- •4.2. Parliamentary approval of the budget
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting systems
- •Box II.4. Finland: Legal requirements for annual report and annual accounts
- •Table II.5. Legal requirements for submission of annual report to the legislature: Selected countries
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Have standards for the legal framework of budget systems been drawn up?
- •1.1. Normative and positive approaches to budget law
- •1.2. Limited guidance from normative constitutional economics
- •2. Who should set and monitor legally binding standards?
- •2.1. Role of politicians and bureaucrats
- •2.2. International transmission of budget system laws
- •2.3. International organisations as standard setters
- •Box III.1. The OECD Best Practices for Budget Transparency
- •Box III.2. Constitutional norms for external audit: Extracts from the INTOSAI “Lima Declaration”
- •2.4. Monitoring standards
- •3. Principles to support the legal framework of budget systems
- •Box III.3. Ten principles for a budget law
- •3.1. Authoritativeness
- •Table III.1. Stages of the budget cycle and legal instruments
- •3.2. Annual basis
- •3.3. Universality
- •3.4. Unity
- •3.5. Specificity
- •3.6. Balance
- •3.7. Accountability
- •Box III.4. Possible minimum legal norms for budget reporting
- •Box III.5. Ingredients of legal norms for external audit
- •3.8. Transparency
- •Box III.6. Ingredients of legal norms for government agencies
- •3.9. Stability or predictability
- •3.10. Performance (or efficiency, economy, and effectiveness)
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •Box 1. Canada: Main budget system laws
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system laws
- •Box 2. Canada: Main provisions of the Spending Control Act 1992
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and the powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The executive and the legislature
- •3.2. Roles and responsibilities of sub-national governments
- •Box 3. Canada: Major transfers from the federal to the provincial governments
- •4. Legal provisions for each stage of the budget cycle
- •4.1. Budget preparation and presentation by the executive
- •Box 4. Canada: Key steps in the annual budgeting process
- •Box 5. Canada: Major contents of the main estimates
- •4.2. Budget process in Parliament
- •Box 6. Canada: The budget approval process in Parliament
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
- •4.5. External audit
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •Box 1. France: Main budget system laws
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system laws
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and the powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The executive and the legislature
- •3.2. Role and responsibilities of sub-national governments
- •Box 3. France: Key features of the Local Government Code
- •4. Legal provisions for each stage of the budget cycle
- •4.1. Budget preparation and presentation by the executive
- •4.2. Budget process in Parliament
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
- •4.5. External audit
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •Box 1. Germany: Main budget system laws
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system laws
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and the powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The executive and the legislature
- •Box 2. Germany: Public agencies
- •3.2. Role and responsibilities of sub-national governments
- •4. Legal provisions for each stage of the budget cycle
- •4.1. Budget preparation and presentation by the executive
- •4.2. Budget process in Parliament
- •Box 3. Germany: Budget processes in Parliament
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
- •4.5. External audit17
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •Box 1. Japan: Main budget system laws
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system laws
- •Box 2. Japan: Main contents of the 1997 Fiscal Structural Reform Act
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and the powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The executive and the legislature
- •3.2. Role and responsibilities of sub-national governments
- •Box 3. Japan: Grants from central government to local governments
- •4. Legal provisions for each stage of the budget cycle
- •4.1. Budget preparation and presentation by the executive
- •Box 4. Japan: The timetable for the budget process
- •Box 5. Japan: Additional documents attached to the draft budget
- •4.2. Budget process in Parliament
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
- •4.5. External audit
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •Box 1. Korea: Main budget system laws
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system laws
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and the powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The executive and the legislature
- •3.2. Role and responsibilities of sub-national governments
- •Box 3. Korea: Major acts governing the fiscal relationship across government levels
- •4. Legal provisions for each stage of the budget cycle
- •4.1. Budget preparation and presentation by the executive
- •Box 4. Korea: Legal requirements for the timetable for budget preparation and deliberation
- •Box 5. Korea: Other documents annexed to the draft budget
- •4.2. Budget process in Parliament
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
- •4.5. External audit
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system laws
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and the powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The executive and the legislature
- •3.2. Role and responsibilities of sub-national governments
- •4. Legal provisions for each stage of the budget cycle
- •4.1. Budget preparation and presentation by the executive
- •Box 2. New Zealand: Fiscal responsibility (legal provisions)
- •Box 3. New Zealand: Key steps and dates for budget preparation by the government
- •Box 4. New Zealand: Information required to support the first appropriation act
- •4.2. Budget process in Parliament
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
- •4.5. External audit
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •Box 1. Nordic Countries: The main budget system laws or near-laws
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system laws
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The constitutions of the four countries
- •Table 1. Nordic countries: Age and size of constitutions
- •3.2. Legislatures
- •Table 2. Nordic countries: Constitutional provisions for the legislatures
- •3.3. The political executive
- •Table 3. Nordic countries: Constitutional provisions for the political executive
- •3.4. Ministries and executive agencies
- •3.5. Civil service
- •3.6. Sub-national governments
- •4. Constitutional and other legal requirements for budgeting
- •4.1. Authority of Parliament
- •Table 4. Nordic countries: Constitutional provisions for the authority of Parliament
- •4.2. Timing of submission of the annual budget
- •4.3. Non-adoption of the annual budget before the year begins
- •4.4. Content of the budget and types of appropriations
- •4.5. Documents to accompany the draft budget law
- •4.6. Parliamentary committees and budget procedures in Parliament
- •4.7. Parliamentary amendment powers, coalition agreements, two-stage budgeting and fiscal rules
- •4.8. Supplementary budgets
- •4.10. Cancellation of appropriations and contingency funds
- •4.11. Government accounting
- •4.12. Other fiscal reporting and special reports
- •Table 5. Nordic countries: Constitutional requirements for external audit
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •Box 1. Spain: Main budget system laws
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system laws
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and the powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The executive and the legislature
- •3.2. Role and responsibilities of sub-national governments
- •4. Legal provisions for each stage of the budget cycle
- •4.1. Budget preparation and presentation by the executive
- •Box 2. Spain: The timetable for the budget process (based on the fiscal year 2003)
- •Box 3. Spain: The major content of medium-term budget plans
- •Box 4. Spain: Additional documents attached to the draft budget
- •4.2. Budget process in Parliament
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
- •4.5. External audit
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •Box 1. United Kingdom: Main budget system laws
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system law
- •Box 2. United Kingdom: Reforms of the budget system in the past 20 years
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and the powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The executive and the legislature
- •Box 3. United Kingdom: Executive agencies and other bodies
- •3.2. Role and responsibilities of sub-national governments
- •4. Legal provisions for each stage of the budget cycle
- •4.1. Budget preparation and presentation by the executive
- •4.2. Budget process in Parliament
- •Box 4. United Kingdom: Budget processes in Parliament
- •Table 1. United Kingdom: Format of appropriation adopted by Parliament for Department X
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •Table 2. United Kingdom: Transfers of budgetary authority
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
- •4.5. External audit
- •Box 5. United Kingdom: External audit arrangements
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
- •1. Overview
- •1.1. The legal framework governing budget processes
- •Box 1. United States: Main federal budget system laws
- •1.2. Reforms of budget system laws
- •2. Principles underlying budget system laws
- •3. Legal basis for the establishment and the powers of the actors in the budget system
- •3.1. The executive and the legislature
- •3.2. Role and responsibilities of sub-national governments
- •Box 3. United States: Major transfers between different levels of government
- •4. Legal provisions for each stage of the budget cycle
- •4.1. Budget preparation and presentation by the executive
- •Box 4. United States: Key steps in the annual budget process within the executive
- •Box 5. United States: Other information required by law
- •4.2. Budget process in the legislature
- •Box 6. United States: Legal and internal deadlines for congressional budget approval
- •4.3. Budget execution
- •4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
- •4.5. External audit
- •5. Sanctions and non-compliance
- •Notes
- •Bibliography
IV. SPAIN
following year, and no other appropriations are available, a supplementary State budget is allowable under the following conditions (Art. 55).
●Should the need arise in non-financial operations of the budget, the supplementary budget shall be financed by offsetting it against the expenditure in the contingency fund or in other non-financial funds. (See section 4.3.3 and footnote for a discussion of non-financial operations.)
●Should the need arise in financial operations of the budget, it shall be financed with public debt by reducing expenditures of the same type.
The MOEF proposes draft supplementary budgets to the Council of Ministers, following a report by the Directorate General of Budgeting. After approval by the Council of Ministers, the bill is submitted to Parliament. Supplementary budgets for autonomous bodies and social security are prepared using procedures similar to those for the State budget (Art. 56 for SGCs and Art. 57 for social security).
4.2.10. Budgetary implications of other bills
The GABS and the GBA require that legal provisions and regulations, during their draft stage, their preparation and approval, administrative acts, contracts and co-operation agreements and any other actions by the public sector, take into account their budgetary effects and be subject to strict compliance with budgetary stability requirements (Art. 6.2, GABS; Art. 26, GBA).
4.3. Budget execution
4.3.1. Apportionment of expenditure authority
After approval of the State budget, the MOEF prepares and approves, at the proposal of the Director General of Public Finance and Financial Policy, an annual budget execution plan that contains a projection of State revenue and accommodates the issuance of payment orders (Art. 106.1). To prepare the budget execution plan, the Director General of Public Finance and Financial Policy gathers from the State sector any data, projections and documentation it considers necessary on payments and revenues that may have an impact on the State budget (Art. 106.2). The budget execution plan may be modified throughout the year in accordance with data on execution or changes in revenue or payment projections (Art. 106.3). The amount of payments ordered at any time is required to be consistent with the annual budget execution plan (Art. 107.1).
OECD JOURNAL ON BUDGETING – VOLUME 4 – NO. 3 – ISSN 1608-7143 – © OECD 2004 |
395 |
|
IV. SPAIN
4.3.2. Cancellation of budget authority and other in-year expenditure control
The law does not require the government to spend approved appropriations in their entirety. In exceptional circumstances, where State sector entities have more cash available than initially projected, the MOEF is authorised by the GBA to cancel part or whole of the budgeted transfers to these State sector entities, without the approval of Parliament (Art. 45).
4.3.3. Emergency spending, excessive spending and contingency funds
The GABS, later confirmed by the GBA, prescribes the procedure for the use of a contingency fund during budget execution (Art. 15, GABS; Art. 50, GBA). In order to meet non-discretionary spending that had not been foreseen when the budget was approved, the State budget can include a “contingency fund for budget execution” for an amount of 2% of total spending.9 In no case may the fund be used to finance programmes or policies that originate in discretionary decisions of the government.
The use of the contingency fund requires the approval of the Council of Ministers following a proposal made by the MOEF. The government, through the MOEF, will submit to the Budget Committees of the Deputies and of the Senate for their information, a quarterly report on contingency fund spending. Credit remaining at the end of the fiscal year may be carried over to the next fiscal year.
4.3.4. Transfers and virement of appropriations within the year
Transfer between lines of appropriations is permissible, but these are subject to certain conditions (Art. 52). Restrictions are not applied to transfers of expenditures arising from administrative restructuring or the devolution of authority to SGCs. In summary:
●Transfers are not possible between non-financial spending and financial spending, nor from capital expenditures to current operations.
●Transfers are not possible between the expenditure of different budget sections.
●Transfers shall not reduce mandatory expenditures or expenditures that have been extended or supplemented during the year (except for social security spending and for public debt).
●Within the social security system, expenditures may not be reduced except to finance other expenditures.
Transfers between expenditures of the same programme or between programmes of the same service are possible; these are at the discretion of line ministers on the basis of a favourable report by the delegate comptroller
396 |
OECD JOURNAL ON BUDGETING – VOLUME 4 – NO. 3 – ISSN 1608-7143 – © OECD 2004 |
|
IV. SPAIN
in the ministry (Art. 63). However, the government, upon a proposal of the MOEF and at the initiative of the ministries involved, has the power to authorise transfers between different budgetary sections as a result of administrative reorganisation, and the MOEF has the power to authorise certain other transfers (Art. 61).
4.3.5. Cash planning and management of government assets and debts
The MOEF has overall responsibility for cash planning and government asset and debt management (Titles IV and VI, GBA). Cash management is based on the principle of a single account (see below). Money is paid out of the single treasury account according to the budget execution plan prepared by the MOEF. The MOEF also has authority over State debt management and procedures (Art. 98, GBA). The GBA requires the MOEF to report to the Parliament on the amount and the characteristics of the main public debt guarantees and public debts issued during the year.
4.3.6. Internal audit
A strong framework of internal control of public finance operates in Spain, and each ministry or public body has its own internal control function. The next tier of control is provided by the MOEF, in particular the General Controller of State Administration (GCSA), which has staff based within, but fully independent of, each public body (United Kingdom National Audit Office, 2001). The GBA governs the overall procedures for internal oversight of financial management of the State sector (Title VI). The GCSA exercises, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Constitution, internal oversight of the financial management of the State sector (Art. 140) in line with the following objectives (Art. 142):
●To verify compliance with regulations on the management of public finance.
●To verify the proper recording and accounting of operations, and their faithful and regular reflection in accounts and statements.
●To ensure that the activity and procedures under oversight are performed in accordance with the principles of good financial management and particularly those contained in the GABS.
4.4. Government accounting and fiscal reporting
4.4.1. The accounting framework
The GBA provides the legal framework for the accounting arrangements of the State sector (Title V, Arts. 119-139). At the recommendation of the GCSA, the MOEF has the powers (Art. 124) to approve the chart of accounts, which contains and develops public accounting principles. The MOEF also
OECD JOURNAL ON BUDGETING – VOLUME 4 – NO. 3 – ISSN 1608-7143 – © OECD 2004 |
397 |
|
IV. SPAIN
determines the criteria for recording data, presenting accounting information, and specifying the contents of the annual accounts that must be submitted to the COA (Art. 124). The GCSA, under guidelines provided by the MOEF, plays an important role in implementing public accounting (Art. 125).
Accounting in the State sector is defined as “a system of financial and budgetary information that has the aim of showing, through financial statements and reports, a faithful status of the assets, financial situations, results and budgetary performance of the State sector” (Arts. 119 and 120). For the administrative public sector, accounting principles and the chart of accounts are based on modified accrual accounting. In contrast, the semicommercial public sector (for example, semi-commercial public enterprise, State commercial entities) applies the accounting norms and principles contained in the Commercial Code and the chart of accounts used by private companies, with some adaptation (accrual based accounting) (Art. 121).
4.4.2. Government banking arrangements
In general, revenue and payments of the State and its autonomous bodies are to be channelled through accounts held in the Bank of Spain (Art. 108.1 and Art. 13, Bank of Spain Autonomy Act 13/1994). In exceptional circumstances, the MOEF may authorise the Director General of Public Finance and Financial Policy to open accounts in other lending institutions.
4.4.3. In-year reporting to Parliament
The GCSA requires monthly budget execution information, including for social security, to be provided to the Budget Committees of the Deputies and of the Senate (Art. 135). This report is published in the Official State Gazette and on the MOEF Internet site.
4.4.4. Annual accounts and reports
The Constitution requires that the State accounts be submitted to the COA for audit (Art. 136). The GBA specifies this procedure further (Arts. 127-134). It requires all entities in the State sector to prepare annual accounts within three months following closure of the fiscal year and to place them at the disposal of the auditors (Art. 127). These consist of the balance, the economic and assets result account, the cash balance of the budget and the annual report (Art. 128). Entities in the State sector are required to submit to the COA, through the GCSA, the required accounting information (Art. 137).
The General Account of the State, which is the consolidated general accounts of all entities of the State sector, is prepared yearly by the GCSA, and is forwarded to the government for its approval before its submission to the COA prior to 31 October of the following year (Art. 131). The General Account
398 |
OECD JOURNAL ON BUDGETING – VOLUME 4 – NO. 3 – ISSN 1608-7143 – © OECD 2004 |
|