Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5787_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
39 Мб
Скачать
84
C. C. M. de Freitas et al.
have been broken, whether of knowledge, courage, challenge, or truths that turn into lies and vice versa. But at the same time, we have learned that the current stage of Internet technology allows us to remain connected and united and, better yet, continue to exchange experiences and knowledge. In this new scenario, where distances have been shortened with technology, the SBNR launched two main projects.
The rst was a remote education platform for the Acute Management of Stroke disease associated with COVID-19 in the same case. It was coordinated by Dr. Francisco Jose Mont’Alvene, Prof. Marcos Lange (President of the Brazilian Society of Cerebrovascular Diseases), Prof. Carlos Clayton Macedo, Prof. Joao Jose Carvalho (Former President of the Brazilian Society of Cerebrovascular Diseases), Dr. Fabricio Oliveira Lima (Brazilian Society of Cerebrovascular Diseases) and Prof. Jose Batista Cysne (Educational coordinator). This course was addressed to Interventional Neuroradiology and Neurology fellows and based on an active pedagogy, addressing the specic learning objectives of each module: (1) Initial patient management; (2) neuroimaging; (3) decision-making process for reperfusion therapies; (4) patient management in Stroke Unit. Using distance learn­ing pedagogy and Internet tools, it was possible to bring training centers closer by sharing their experiences in teaching the learning objectives and standardizing and improving care protocols, adding signicant value to the resident’s training to main­tain the training of professionals. It’s evolved with more than 100 participants from all over Brazil.
The second project was the CONNECTA BRASIL and SIG-CONNECTA Neuro, which proposed a rapprochement between Brazilian Neuroradiologists so that we could fraternally get to know each other better and exchange experiences through virtual meetings. Many meetings were held every 2weeks or months in a virtual environment, each lasting 2h, with a list of attendance and identication of all par­ticipants. This project took place in 2020 and 2021, coordinated by Dr. Elias Rabahi, Dr. Wilson Novais, and Prof. Carlos Clayton M de Freitas for therapeutic meetings and Dr. Felipe Pacheco from São Paulo, Dr. Pablo Coimbra from Ceará, Dr. Leonardo Macedo from Minas Gerais, and Dra. Nina Ventura from Rio de Janeiro for diagnostic meeting.
During this period of isolation, a fascinating association between Brazil and other countries in South America created the most prominent online meeting that we have ever seen on our continent, the GSANIT/CONNECTOR BRASIL.Many colleagues were founders of GSANIT, such as Prof. Luiz Lemme, Dr. Ronie Piske, Dr. Javier Echevarrieta, Prof. Orlando Dias, Dra. Azucena Davila Malaga, Dr. Luiz Portela, Dr. German Abdo, Dr. Gelson Koppe, Dr. Eduardo Raupp, Dr. Eduardo Bravo, Dr. Boris Pabon, Dr. Rodrigo Rivera Miranda, and others. Their initiatives include organizing academic meetings and events, such as the annual meeting in different South American countries, to discuss advancements and strategies in neuro intervention in a free ambiance. They also offer a robust library online (PNVS) with many case discussions and lectures, a vital tool for education.
6 Recent History oftheBrazilian Society ofDiagnostic andTherapeutic Neuroradiology
85
The Old Became New
Despite the isolation and lockdown, the SBNR has found ways to stay connected, share knowledge, and support each other. The COVID-19 pandemic has been chal­lenging for all of us, but it has also shown our resilience and ability to adapt. As we continue to navigate these difcult times, we must remember the strength and unity we have demonstrated as a global community.
The Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) simulation started before 2016, but only a few centers were used for training. Our rst contact with the Mentice simula­tor was on May 27, 2019, during the SBNR certication. After that, the SBNR began to use the simulators in a hands-on course and certication.
We applied simulator-based learning with remote online teaching, adapting to the lockdown moment and allowing professors and fellows to continue developing their skills. The initiative aimed to maintain high standards of medical education and ensure that professionals remained procient in advanced techniques, thereby supporting the society’s mission to improve neuroradiology training in Brazil. In 2021, we successfully launched a turnaround initiative across 21 training centers spread across the country, providing a comprehensive 1-week course to all partici­pants. This approach exemplies the resilience and adaptability of medical educa­tion in challenging times.
The International Symposium of Neuroradiology embraces the lessons learned during lockdown by offering attendees a unique and immersive experience. Participants will engage in hands-on sessions focused on diagnostic neuroradiology, allowing for in-depth discussions of challenging cases with experts in the eld. This interactive format enhances learning and fosters a sense of community among pro­fessionals, ensuring a valuable experience for all involved.
SBNR’S Partnership withOther Institutions
In recent years, SBNR has strengthened its relationship with SOBRICE, SBN, ABNc, SBDCV, SILAN, AMB, and CBR.This collaboration has facilitated numer­ous educational initiatives and support efforts focused on cerebrovascular disease in Brazil. Together, they aim to address the profound effects of stroke and related conditions.
SILAN BRAZIL 2004, an unforgettable meeting occurred in Costa do Sauípe, organized by SILAN and SBNR.This event was marked by high-level case discus­sions, showcasing cutting-edge technology and featuring esteemed international guests. The atmosphere was professional and friendly, fostering an environment conducive to learning and networking. Participants left with new insights and con­nections, making it a memorable experience for all involved.
By pooling resources and expertise, the SBNR strives to improve patient outcomes through innovative treatment strategies and comprehensive care models. Their work
86
focuses on news images and technologies, and the recent neurointervention approach emphasizes pre-hospital care, treatment, rehabilitation, and long-term support for stroke survivors. The Resilient Trial was a national research network that resulted from this collaborative effort focused on stroke treatment. The trial aims to assess the efcacy of new treatment modalities and interventions for stroke patients, and its suc­cess depends on the active participation and support of multiple societies and organi­zations. This collective action reects the commitment of the medical community to continuously enhance the quality of care and treatment options for individuals affected by stroke. This trial was approved and funded from the Brazilian Federal Government. The Hospital Geral of Fortaleza (HGF) national reference in Stroke care was the leading institution contributing to the Resilient Trial and Basic trial.
The rst neuroradiology coding manual was created in 2019, establishing national parameters for charging professional fees. Last but not least, the societies involved have been developing guidelines to ensure that the best available scientic evidence is used to service patients with cerebrovascular disease [8].
Numerous impactful activities have occurred, such as meetings, congresses, symposiums, and online case discussions focused on political and educational objectives. It is worth highlighting the session at the national congress with deputies to discuss the planning for implementing thrombectomy nancing in the country’s SUS network.
C. C. M. de Freitas et al.
In Memory ofProfessors Pierre Lasjaunias, Luc Picard, andRonie Leo Piske
Professor Pierre Lasjaunias, who passed away in 2008, was a renowned gure in anatomy and neuroanatomy. He was a prolic author and dedicated educator, shar­ing his expertise in neuroradiology with students worldwide. Known for his strong personality, Lasjaunias made signicant contributions to interventional neuroradiol­ogy, particularly in treating vein of Galen malformations. His sudden death pro­foundly impacted the medical community, underscoring the loss of a brilliant mind and compassionate clinician who transformed patient care with his innovative techniques.
Professor Luc Picard, a pioneer in interventional neuroradiology, passed away in 2021, leaving a profound legacy. His groundbreaking contributions to the eld and his heartfelt commitment to curriculum development and ethical standards dened the WFITN approach’s humanitarian spirit. Picard was deeply passionate about interventional neuroradiology, demonstrating unwavering care for his patients and a genuine concern for his student’s growth. His contributions have left an indelible mark on the medical community, ensuring his inuence will be felt for generations.
Dr. Ronie Leo Piske was a luminary in interventional neuroradiology whose con­tributions have left an indelible mark on the medical community. Born in São Paulo, Brazil, and of French descent, Dr. Piske was a pioneer in neurointervention, a eld
6 Recent History oftheBrazilian Society ofDiagnostic andTherapeutic Neuroradiology
87
that combines radiology and neurology to treat complex brain and spinal conditions using minimally invasive techniques.
His career was largely centered at the Hospital da Benecência Portuguesa in São Paulo, where he served as professor and mentor to many aspiring neuroradiolo­gists. Dr. Piske’s dedication to education and training helped shape the next genera­tion of specialists, ensuring that his innovative techniques and compassionate approach to patient care continued to inuence the eld long after his passing.
Dr. Piske was a skilled clinician and prolic researcher. His work was widely published and frequently cited by peers, underscoring his role as a thought leader in interventional neuroradiology. His research contributions have been instrumental in advancing the understanding and treatment of neurological disorders, making com­plex procedures safer and more effective.
During his career, Dr. Piske consistently collaborated with other prominent g­ures in the eld, including Jacques Moret and Laurent Spelle. These alliances encouraged a culture of innovation and excellence, reinforcing his status as a world leader in neurointervention.
Dr. Piske’s legacy is reected in his professional achievements and the respect and admiration he garnered from colleagues and patients alike. His commitment to patient care, combined with his pioneering spirit, made him a beloved gure in the medical community.
We honor Dr. Ronie Leo Piske, a devoted advocate for advancing medical sci­ence and enhancing patient outcomes. His work has laid the groundwork for future advancements in neuroradiology, and his impact will resonate for generations.
Advancements andCollaborations
The Brazilian Society of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology (SBNR) has made signicant strides in advancing neuroradiology in Brazil. This progress is marked by the development of a comprehensive new curriculum, the establishment of new training centers, and the breaking of traditional paradigms. These efforts aim to enhance the quality and scope of neuroradiological practice in the country.
The new centers serve as hubs for education and research, fostering an environ­ment of continuous learning and innovation. By expanding training facilities, the SBNR is addressing the growing demand for specialized neuroradiologists and ensuring practitioners have access to state-of-the-art resources and technology.
Since 2019, the Brazilian Society of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology has organized the International Symposium of Neuroradiology (ISN), a pivotal event in South America. The symposium covers cutting-edge topics such as high technology, hands-on training, innovation, case discussions, and online surgery. In 2022, the SBNR introduced a women’s group for Neurointerventionists, highlight­ing their commitment to diversity and inclusion. This annual event provides a unique platform for professionals to engage in immersive learning experiences, fos­tering advancements in neuroradiology.
88
C. C. M. de Freitas et al.
The hands-on course, which began in 2021 with online monitoring, is now offered by SBNR presence as a part of the curriculum and is available to fellows twice a year.
Collaboration and advocacy are pivotal to SBNR’s strategy. By partnering with national and international institutions, the society shares knowledge and best prac­tices, fostering advancements in global neuroradiology. Their commitment to diver­sity is evident through the Women’s Group for Neurointerventionists. Engaging with the federal government, SBNR advocates for public health improvements, aiming to enhance the accessibility and quality of neuroradiological services in Brazil. These efforts underscore the society’s dedication to advancing the eld and improving healthcare outcomes.
In conclusion, the Brazilian Society of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology has committed to advancing the eld through education, collaboration, and advo­cacy. By developing a new curriculum, establishing training centers, and engaging with other societies and the government, the SBNR plays a pivotal role in shaping the future of neuroradiology in Brazil. These efforts not only improve the standards of practice but also contribute to the overall improvement of public health systems in the country.
Future Challenges forInterventional Neuroradiology inBrazil
The future holds many uncertainties, yet we need to strategize in alignment with our objectives. The executive committee of SBNR is prepared for the new and excited challengers as:
1. Geographic distribution and access: Despite efforts to expand training centers,
signicant challenges may still exist in equitably distributing fused professionals nationwide. The historical concentration of training centers in the Southeast and South has caused many physicians to emigrate from their home regions, exacer­bating inequities in the availability of specialists. The objective is to enhance professional training while collaborating with government entities to invest in public institutions. We can foster a more effective and impactful educational environment by improving research, assistance, and teaching through high tech­nology and resources.
2. Curriculum standardization: Although a standardized curriculum has been
developed and planned, uniform implementation across all training centers may continue to be challenging. Ensuring that all centers strictly follow the standard­ized curriculum is crucial to maintaining the quality of training.
3. Integration of new technologies: The rapid evolution of medical technologies
requires that training programs continually adapt to incorporate new techniques and equipment. Keeping up with technological innovations and integrating effective forms into the curriculum may be an ongoing challenge. The cost and sustainability of high-complexity medicine are challenges not only to income countries but worldwide.
6
Recent History oftheBrazilian Society ofDiagnostic andTherapeutic Neuroradiology
89
4. International collaboration: Although there are fellowship and exchange pro-
grams with other societies worldwide, maintaining and expanding these collabo­rations to ensure that Brazilian professionals can access international best practices can be challenging.
5. Continuing professional development: In addition to initial training, profession-
als must have access to ongoing professional development opportunities to update their skills and knowledge throughout their careers.
We conclude with the photo taken during the 17th Congress of WFITN in NewYork, USA.This photo symbolizes a nation ready to welcome the international community at the World Congress 2028.
Readers are suggested to contact the corresponding author for gures if needed.

References

1. Bull JWD.Section of the history of medicine. Proc R Soc Med. 1970;63:637–43.
2. Manual do residente do Hospital das Clinicas da USP de Sao Paulo. https://doi.org/10.1590/
S0004- 282X1984000100017.
3. Zaclis J.Cerebral pan-angiography is the name we suggest for the visualization of all intra-
cranial blood vessels after injection of contrast medium in one of the carotid arteries. Arq
Neuropsiquiatr. 1959;17(1):1–22.
4. Sezana WE. Academia de Medicina de Brasilia. https://www.ameb.org.br/index.php/
academicos/membros/33- emeritos/138- wilson- eliseu- sesana.
5. Raupp SF.Radiculograa com contraste hidro-solúvel. Porto Alegre: Universidade Federal do
Rio Grande do Sul; 1960.
90
6. Mont’Alverne F, etal. Management of acute stroke and urgent neuro-interventional procedures
during COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations on the Scientic Department on cerebrovas-
cular diseases of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology, Brazilian Society of Cerebrovascular
Diseases and Brazilian Society of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology. Arq
Neuropsiquiatr. 2020;78(7):440–9.
7. Barros NG. https://inrad.hc.fm.usp.br/residencia- medica- em- radiologia- e- diagnostico-
por- imagem/.
8. Pontes-Neto OM, etal. Brazilian guidelines for endovascular treatment of patients with acute
ischemic stroke. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2017;75(1):50–6.
C. C. M. de Freitas et al.
Open Access
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Chapter 7
A History oftheBritish Neuroradiology fromthePerspective ofBritish Society ofNeuroradiologists
ChristopherRowland-Hill andDipayanMitra

Early Days

The British Society of Neuroradiologists was conceived in the late 1960s and after preliminary gatherings, the rst ofcial meeting of the Society took place in London in May 1970. Membership comprised consultant neuroradiologists from neurosci­ence centres throughout the UK.At the time it was typical for these centres to only have 1 or 2 full-time neuroradiologists, and membership was less than 40. Throughout the 1970s the main business of the Society was to organise a 1-day annual scientic meeting (ASM), sometimes as a joint meeting with other societies, including the ESNR in 1972 and the Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS) in 1973. Meetings were hosted by neuroscience centres within the UK on a rotational basis. Probably the most important and inuential presentation at a BSNR meeting was given by Dr. Jamie Ambrose in Glasgow in 1972, describing his expe­rience of the world’s rst CT scanner at Atkinson Morley’s Hospital, London. The Society also set up small working groups to deal with standards, manpower and training and published reports covering these issues.
At the dawn of the 1980s, the Society was still exclusively male, welcoming the rst female member in 1982. Whereas the 1970s had been the decade of CT, 1980 heralded the arrival of MRI with a presentation from Nottingham on NMR (as it was then known) at the 1980 ASM.In 1981, the ASM extended to two days and included a half-day Registrars Course with didactic teaching. With the emergence of
C. Rowland-Hill Hull Royal Inrmary, Kingston upon Hull, UK e-mail: chris.rowland-hill@nhs.net
D. Mitra ( Royal Victoria Inrmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK e-mail: d.mitra@nhs.net
D. Birchall (ed.), A World History of Neuroradiology,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-16653-1_7
*)
91© The Author(s) 2026
92
C. Rowland-Hill and D. Mitra
Interventional Neuroradiology as a major advance in treatment of neurovascular conditions, an Interventional Neuroradiology Working Party was formed after dis­cussion at the 1983 meeting in Leeds.

1990s

The Annual Scientic Meeting of the BSNR was by now rmly established as a 2-day event, including a half day of didactic lectures, held in early October. This continued during the decade with the exception of 1997, when the ESNR was held in Oxford.
In 1990, the United Kingdom Neurointerventional Group (UKNG) was formed, open to all practising neurointerventionists, meeting twice per year to discuss scien­tic, clinical and technical developments and to present cases of interest. The meet­ings were generously sponsored by industry and, at most meetings, a leading international neurointerventionist was invited to speak.
There were concerns that the formation of the UKNG might split the BSNR and negatively impact on sponsorship for BSNR events. The Diagnostic Neuroradiology Forum (DNF) was set up as a separate group of diagnostic neuroradiologists but many felt that the BSNR already fullled this function. The DNF failed to establish itself in sufcient numbers and was disbanded after a small number of meetings.
The 1995 BSNR ASM included the introduction of an eponymous lecture in honour of Dr. James Bull, a key gure in the development of neuroradiology as a speciality in the UK and who was a founder member and the rst President of the BSNR. The inaugural lecture was delivered by Professor Michael Sage from Adelaide on the topic of the Blood Brain Barrier. The James Bull Lecture is deliv­ered every year at the ASM by a distinguished national or international speaker in the eld of clinical or sometimes non-clinical neuroscience.
In 1996, the Society published the rst edition of Effective Neuroradiology. This was a comprehensive 36-page guideline produced by a subcommittee chaired by Professor Ian Isherwood, intended as a reference document for the provision of neuroradiology services in the UK.The guideline encompassed facilities, stafng, training, provision of neurointervention and integration with other clinical neurosci­ences. An appendix provides a snapshot of UK neuroradiology manpower in the mid-1990s. There were 107 consultant neuroradiologists, averaging 2.6 per depart­ment and 8 training posts, of which 4 were based in London. There have been major revisions of this document in 2003 and 2012; the 2012 version was titled Safe Neuroradiology.
During the mid-late 1990s, there were discussions on whether or not a UK-based higher qualication in neuroradiology along the lines of the American Certicate of Added Qualication (CAQ), was required or desirable. Opinion was divided with some strongly in favour. It was recognised that setting up such a qualication would require considerable resource plus the support of the RCR, and ultimately, a UK CAQ equivalent never came to fruition.
7 A History of the British Neuroradiology from the Perspective of British Society…
93
In 1998, the BSNR’s ASM was held overseas for the rst time, in Kinsale, Ireland. At this time, the Irish Society of Neuroradiology was yet to exist. Further overseas meetings occurred in Amsterdam (2003) hosted by the late Dr. Gareth Davies and in Dublin (2017), the latter being a joint meeting with the Irish Society of Neuroradiology.
Up until the late 1990s, Ofcers of the BSNR had been nominated by the Committee with appointments ratied at the Annual Business Meeting held during the Annual Scientic Meeting. Feedback from neuroradiology trainees at the Kinsale meeting revealed that juniors felt the Society was undemocratic and out of touch. At the 1999 Annual Business Meeting (ABM) it was agreed that thenceforth candidates for the post of president and other Society Ofcers could be proposed and seconded by any full member of the Society, followed by an election with all full members entitled to vote. A Committee post of Junior Member was also estab­lished and the post of Educational Advisor was formalised.

Year 2000 Onwards

In the 1990s, Dr. Andrew Molyneux in Oxford had conceived the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT), a randomised, multicentre trial to compare the safety and efcacy of endovascular coiling with standard neurosurgical clipping for such aneurysms judged to be suitable for both treatments. The trial was stopped after 2143 patients had been enrolled. The results, published in the Lancet in 2002, showed conclusively that outcomes at 1year post treatment were better in the endo­vascular group. This had major implications for neuroradiology in the UK.Although the endovascular treatment of aneurysms had risen steadily through the 1990s, the new high-level evidence-based need to provide coiling services on a 7- or at least 6-day basis was a major challenge for individuals, departments and national bodies, including the UKNG and BSNR.
Radiology training in the UK at the time was, and still is, based on three years of core training followed by two years of specialist higher training. Ideally, the Fellowship of the Royal College of Radiologists (FRCR) is passed, by written and viva examination, at the end of the third year of training or soon after. At the time, two years of higher training was available for neuroradiology whether just diagnos­tic or diagnostic plus intervention. The feeling among several interventionists was that two years was insufcient time to train adequately in both branches of neurora­diology. The BSNR’s push for three years of higher training for neurointervention­ists was initially met with resistance by the RCR and GMC. Fortunately, our colleagues in Interventional Radiology (non-neuro) were pursuing the same aim and eventually Interventional Neuroradiology and Interventional Radiology were incorporated into a 3-year higher training curriculum. The stage was set for expan­sion of training in neurointervention to meet the demand for the clinical service.
The business and meetings of the Society continued along the same lines during the decade. Having had exclusively male presidents, in 2003, the Society elected its