
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •2.1 Introduction and a Short History of Black Holes
- •2.2 The Kruskal Extension of Schwarzschild Space-Time
- •2.2.1 Analysis of the Rindler Space-Time
- •2.2.2 Applying the Same Procedure to the Schwarzschild Metric
- •2.2.3 A First Analysis of Kruskal Space-Time
- •2.3 Basic Concepts about Future, Past and Causality
- •2.3.1 The Light-Cone
- •2.3.2 Future and Past of Events and Regions
- •Achronal Sets
- •Time-Orientability
- •Domains of Dependence
- •Cauchy surfaces
- •2.4.1 Conformal Mapping of Minkowski Space into the Einstein Static Universe
- •2.4.2 Asymptotic Flatness
- •2.5 The Causal Boundary of Kruskal Space-Time
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 The Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.2.1 Riemann and Ricci Curvatures of the Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.3 The Static Limit in Kerr-Newman Space-Time
- •Static Observers
- •3.4 The Horizon and the Ergosphere
- •The Horizon Area
- •3.5 Geodesics of the Kerr Metric
- •3.5.2 The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation and the Carter Constant
- •3.5.3 Reduction to First Order Equations
- •3.5.4 The Exact Solution of the Schwarzschild Orbit Equation as an Application
- •3.5.5 About Explicit Kerr Geodesics
- •3.6 The Kerr Black Hole and the Laws of Thermodynamics
- •3.6.1 The Penrose Mechanism
- •3.6.2 The Bekenstein Hawking Entropy and Hawking Radiation
- •References
- •4.1 Historical Introduction to Modern Cosmology
- •4.2 The Universe Is a Dynamical System
- •4.3 Expansion of the Universe
- •4.3.1 Why the Night is Dark and Olbers Paradox
- •4.3.2 Hubble, the Galaxies and the Great Debate
- •4.3.4 The Big Bang
- •4.4 The Cosmological Principle
- •4.5 The Cosmic Background Radiation
- •4.6 The New Scenario of the Inflationary Universe
- •4.7 The End of the Second Millennium and the Dawn of the Third Bring Great News in Cosmology
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Mathematical Interlude: Isometries and the Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.1 Isometries and Killing Vector Fields
- •5.2.2 Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3 The Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.1 Infinitesimal Transformations and Killing Vectors
- •5.2.3.2 Vielbeins, Connections and Metrics on G/H
- •5.2.3.3 Lie Derivatives
- •5.2.3.4 Invariant Metrics on Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.5 For Spheres and Pseudo-Spheres
- •5.3 Homogeneity Without Isotropy: What Might Happen
- •5.3.1 Bianchi Spaces and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.1.1 Bianchi Type I and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.2.1 A Ricci Flat Bianchi II Metric
- •5.3.3 Einstein Equation and Matter for This Billiard
- •5.3.4 The Same Billiard with Some Matter Content
- •5.3.5 Three-Space Geometry of This Toy Model
- •5.4 The Standard Cosmological Model: Isotropic and Homogeneous Metrics
- •5.4.1 Viewing the Coset Manifolds as Group Manifolds
- •5.5 Friedman Equations for the Scale Factor and the Equation of State
- •5.5.1 Proof of the Cosmological Red-Shift
- •5.5.2 Solution of the Cosmological Differential Equations for Dust and Radiation Without a Cosmological Constant
- •5.5.3 Embedding Cosmologies into de Sitter Space
- •5.6 General Consequences of Friedman Equations
- •5.6.1 Particle Horizon
- •5.6.2 Event Horizon
- •5.6.3 Red-Shift Distances
- •5.7 Conceptual Problems of the Standard Cosmological Model
- •5.8 Cosmic Evolution with a Scalar Field: The Basis for Inflation
- •5.8.1 de Sitter Solution
- •5.8.2 Slow-Rolling Approximate Solutions
- •5.8.2.1 Number of e-Folds
- •5.9 Primordial Perturbations of the Cosmological Metric and of the Inflaton
- •5.9.1 The Conformal Frame
- •5.9.2 Deriving the Equations for the Perturbation
- •5.9.2.1 Meaning of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.2.2 Evaluation of the Effective Mass Term in the Slow Roll Approximation
- •5.9.2.3 Derivation of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.3 Quantization of the Scalar Degree of Freedom
- •5.9.4 Calculation of the Power Spectrum in the Two Regimes
- •5.9.4.1 Short Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.2 Long Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.3 Gluing the Long and Short Wave-Length Solutions Together
- •5.9.4.4 The Spectral Index
- •5.10 The Anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background
- •5.10.1 The Sachs-Wolfe Effect
- •5.10.2 The Two-Point Temperature Correlation Function
- •5.10.3 Conclusive Remarks on CMB Anisotropies
- •References
- •6.1 Historical Outline and Introduction
- •6.1.1 Fermionic Strings and the Birth of Supersymmetry
- •6.1.2 Supersymmetry
- •6.1.3 Supergravity
- •6.2 Algebro-Geometric Structure of Supergravity
- •6.3 Free Differential Algebras
- •6.3.1 Chevalley Cohomology
- •Contraction and Lie Derivative
- •Definition of FDA
- •Classification of FDA and the Analogue of Levi Theorem: Minimal Versus Contractible Algebras
- •6.4 The Super FDA of M Theory and Its Cohomological Structure
- •6.4.1 The Minimal FDA of M-Theory and Cohomology
- •6.4.2 FDA Equivalence with Larger (Super) Lie Algebras
- •6.5 The Principle of Rheonomy
- •6.5.1 The Flow Chart for the Construction of a Supergravity Theory
- •6.6 Summary of Supergravities
- •Type IIA Super-Poicaré Algebra in the String Frame
- •The FDA Extension of the Type IIA Superalgebra in the String Frame
- •The Bianchi Identities
- •6.7.1 Rheonomic Parameterizations of the Type IIA Curvatures in the String Frame
- •Bosonic Curvatures
- •Fermionic Curvatures
- •6.7.2 Field Equations of Type IIA Supergravity in the String Frame
- •6.8 Type IIB Supergravity
- •SL(2, R) Lie Algebra
- •Coset Representative of SL(2, R)/O(2) in the Solvable Parameterization
- •The SU(1, 1)/U(1) Vielbein and Connection
- •6.8.2 The Free Differential Algebra, the Supergravity Fields and the Curvatures
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Complex Basis
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Real Basis
- •6.8.3 The Bosonic Field Equations and the Standard Form of the Bosonic Action
- •6.9 About Solutions
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction and Conceptual Outline
- •7.2 p-Branes as World Volume Gauge-Theories
- •7.4 The New First Order Formalism
- •7.4.1 An Alternative to the Polyakov Action for p-Branes
- •7.6 The D3-Brane: Summary
- •7.9 Domain Walls in Diverse Space-Time Dimensions
- •7.9.1 The Randall Sundrum Mechanism
- •7.9.2 The Conformal Gauge for Domain Walls
- •7.10 Conclusion on This Brane Bestiary
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Supergravity and Homogeneous Scalar Manifolds G/H
- •8.2.3 Scalar Manifolds of Maximal Supergravities in Diverse Dimensions
- •8.3 Duality Symmetries in Even Dimensions
- •8.3.1 The Kinetic Matrix N and Symplectic Embeddings
- •8.3.2 Symplectic Embeddings in General
- •8.5 Summary of Special Kähler Geometry
- •8.5.1 Hodge-Kähler Manifolds
- •8.5.2 Connection on the Line Bundle
- •8.5.3 Special Kähler Manifolds
- •8.6 Supergravities in Five Dimension and More Scalar Geometries
- •8.6.1 Very Special Geometry
- •8.6.3 Quaternionic Geometry
- •8.6.4 Quaternionic, Versus HyperKähler Manifolds
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Black Holes Once Again
- •9.2.2 The Oxidation Rules
- •Orbit of Solutions
- •The Schwarzschild Case
- •The Extremal Reissner Nordström Case
- •Curvature of the Extremal Spaces
- •9.2.4 Attractor Mechanism, the Entropy and Other Special Geometry Invariants
- •9.2.5 Critical Points of the Geodesic Potential and Attractors
- •At BPS Attractor Points
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type I
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type II
- •9.2.6.2 The Quartic Invariant
- •9.2.7.1 An Explicit Example of Exact Regular BPS Solution
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •9.2.9 Resuming the Discussion of Critical Points
- •Non-BPS Case
- •BPS Case
- •9.2.10 An Example of a Small Black Hole
- •The Metric
- •The Complex Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Charges
- •Structure of the Charges and Attractor Mechanism
- •9.2.11 Behavior of the Riemann Tensor in Regular Solutions
- •9.3.4 The SO(8) Spinor Bundle and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.5 The Well Adapted Basis of Gamma Matrices
- •9.3.6 The so(8)-Connection and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.7 The Holonomy Tensor and Superspace
- •9.3.8 Gauged Maurer Cartan 1-Forms of OSp(8|4)
- •9.3.9 Killing Spinors of the AdS4 Manifold
- •9.3.10 Supergauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.3.11 The 3-Form
- •9.4.1 Maurer Cartan Forms of OSp(6|4)
- •9.4.2 Explicit Construction of the P3 Geometry
- •9.4.3 The Compactification Ansatz
- •9.4.4 Killing Spinors on P3
- •9.4.5 Gauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.4.6 Gauge Completion of the B[2] Form
- •9.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 The Legacy of Volume 1
- •10.2 The Story Told in Volume 2
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Auxiliary Tools for p-Brane Actions
- •B.1 Notations and Conventions
- •Appendix C: Auxiliary Information About Some Superalgebras
- •C.1.1 The Superalgebra
- •C.2 The Relevant Supercosets and Their Relation
- •C.2.1 Finite Supergroup Elements
- •C.4 An so(6) Inversion Formula
- •Appendix D: MATHEMATICA Package NOVAMANIFOLDA
- •Coset Manifolds (Euclidian Signature)
- •Instructions for the Use
- •Description of the Main Commands of RUNCOSET
- •Structure Constants for CP2
- •Spheres
- •N010 Coset
- •RUNCOSET Package (Euclidian Signature)
- •Main
- •Spin Connection and Curvature Routines
- •Routine Curvapack
- •Routine Curvapackgen
- •Contorsion Routine for Mixed Vielbeins
- •Calculation of the Contorsion for General Manifolds
- •Calculation for Cartan Maurer Equations and Vielbein Differentials (Euclidian Signature)
- •Routine Thoft
- •AdS Space in Four Dimensions (Minkowski Signature)
- •Lie Algebra of SO(2, 3) and Killing Metric
- •Solvable Subalgebra Generating the Coset and Construction of the Vielbein
- •Killing Vectors
- •Trigonometric Coordinates
- •Test of Killing Vectors
- •MANIFOLDPROVA
- •The 4-Dimensional Coset CP2
- •Calculation of the (Pseudo-)Riemannian Geometry of a Kasner Metric in Vielbein Formalism
- •References
- •Index

8.5 Summary of Special Kähler Geometry |
323 |
In (8.4.1) φa denotes the whole set of nS scalar fields parameterizing the scalar |
||||||
manifold M D=4 |
which, for NQ |
≥ |
8, is necessarily a coset manifold: |
|||
scalar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M D=4 |
|
G |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.4.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
scalar |
= H |
For NQ ≤ 8 (8.4.2) is not obligatory but it is possible. Particularly in the N = 2 case, i.e. for NQ = 8, a large variety of homogeneous special Kähler or quaternionic manifolds fall into the set up of the present general discussion. The fields φa have
σ -model interactions dictated by the metric hab(φ) of MscalarD=4 . The theory includes |
||||
also n vector fields AΛ for which |
|
|
|
|
μˆ |
√ |
|
|
|
1 |
det g |
| εμνρσ F ρσ |
|
|
Fμν±|Λ ≡ 2 FμνΛ i |
|
| 2 |
(8.4.3) |
denote the self-dual (respectively antiself-dual) parts of the field-strengths. As displayed in (8.4.1) they are non-minimally coupled to the scalars via the symmetric complex matrix
NΛΣ (φ) = i Im NΛΣ + Re NΛΣ |
(8.4.4) |
which transforms projectively under G. Indeed the field strengths FμνΛ plus their magnetic duals fill up a 2n-dimensional symplectic representation of G which we call by the name of W.
The kinetic matrix is constructed by means of the Gaillard Zumino master formula in all cases where the scalar manifolds is a homogeneous space G/H. In the next section, while discussing special Kähler geometry, we show how to construct NΛΣ also for those S K manifolds that are not homogeneous. Indeed, as we already explained, when supersymmetry is larger than N = 2 the scalar manifold is always a symmetric coset space. For N = 2, on the other hand, the prediction of
supersymmetry is that MscalarD=4 should be a special Kähler manifold S K n, n being the number of considered vector multiplets.10 Special Kähler manifolds are a vast
category of spaces that typically are not cosets and may admit no continuous group of isometries, as it happens, for instance, in the case of moduli spaces of Kähler structure or complex structure deformations of Calabi-Yau three-folds. Nevertheless there exists a subclass of special Kähler manifolds that are also symmetric spaces. For those manifolds the special Kähler structure and the group structure coexist and are tight together in a specific way.
8.5 Summary of Special Kähler Geometry
As recalled in Table 8.1, special Kähler geometry is that pertaining to the scalars of N = 2 vector multiplets in D = 4 supergravity. Its first formulation in spe-
10For simplicity we do not envisage the inclusion of hypermultiplets which would span additional quaternionic manifolds.

324 |
8 Supergravity: A Bestiary in Diverse Dimensions |
cial coordinates was introduced in 1984–85 by B. de Wit et al. and E. Cremmer et al. (see pioneering paper [2]), where the coupling of N = 2 vector multiplets to N = 2 supergravity was fully determined. The more intrinsic definition of special Kähler geometry in terms of symplectic bundles is due to Strominger [5], who obtained it in connection with the moduli spaces of Calabi-Yau compactifications. The coordinate-independent description and derivation of special Kähler geometry in the context of N = 2 supergravity is due to Castellani, D’Auria, Ferrara and to D’Auria, Ferrara, Frè (1991) (see Refs. [3, 4, 20]).
Let us summarize the relevant concepts and definitions.
8.5.1 Hodge-Kähler Manifolds
π
Consider a line bundle L −→M over a Kähler manifold. By definition this is a holomorphic vector bundle of rank r = 1. For such bundles the only available Chern class is the first:
|
i |
|
|
i |
|
|
|
||
c1(L ) = |
|
|
∂ |
h−1∂h = |
|
∂∂ log h |
(8.5.1) |
||
2π |
2π |
where the 1-component real function h(z, z) is some Hermitian fibre metric on L . Let f (z) be a holomorphic section of the line bundle L : noting that under the action of the operator ∂∂ the term log(ξ (z)ξ(z)) yields a vanishing contribution, we conclude that the formula in (8.5.1) for the first Chern class can be re-expressed as follows:
|
i |
|
|
|
|
|
c1(L ) = |
|
∂∂ log9ξ(z)92 |
(8.5.2) |
|||
2π |
|
|||||
|
|
9 |
9 |
|
where /ξ(z)/2 = h(z, z)ξ (z)ξ(z) denotes the norm of the holomorphic section ξ(z). Equation (8.5.2) is the starting point for the definition of Hodge Kähler manifolds. A Kähler manifold M is a Hodge manifold if and only if there exists a line bundle L −→ M such that its first Chern class equals the cohomology class of the
Kähler two-form K:
c1(L ) = [K]
In local terms this means that there is a holomorphic section can write
|
i |
|
|
i |
∂∂ log9W (z)92 |
|||
K = |
2π gij dzi dz |
j |
|
= |
2π |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
9 |
(8.5.3)
W (z) such that we
(8.5.4)
Recalling the local expression of the Kähler metric in terms of the Kähler potential gij = ∂i ∂j K (z, z), it follows from (8.5.4) that if the manifold M is a Hodge manifold, then the exponential of the Kähler potential can be interpreted as the metric h(z, z) = exp(K (z, z)) on an appropriate line bundle L .

8.5 Summary of Special Kähler Geometry |
325 |
8.5.2 Connection on the Line Bundle
On any complex line bundle L there is a canonical Hermitian connection defined as:
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
||
θ ≡ h−1 |
∂i h dzi ; |
θ ≡ h−1 |
|
i |
||||||||
∂h = |
|
∂h = |
|
∂i h dz |
(8.5.5) |
|||||||
h |
h |
For the line-bundle advocated by the Hodge-Kähler structure we have
[ |
∂ |
θ ] = c1(L ) = [K] |
(8.5.6) |
and since the fibre metric h can be identified with the exponential of the Kähler potential we obtain:
θ = ∂K = ∂i K dzi ; |
|
|
|
i |
(8.5.7) |
|
θ |
||||||
= ∂K = ∂i K dz |
To define special Kähler geometry, in addition to the afore-mentioned line-bundle L we need a flat holomorphic vector bundle S V −→ M whose sections play an important role in the construction of the supergravity Lagrangians. For reasons intrinsic to such constructions the rank of the vector bundle S V must be 2nV where nV is the total number of vector fields in the theory. If we have n-vector multiplets the total number of vectors is nV = n + 1 since, in addition to the vectors of the vector multiplets, we always have the graviphoton sitting in the graviton multiplet. On the other hand the total number of scalars is 2n. Suitably paired into n-complex fields zi , these scalars span the n complex dimensions of the base manifold M of the rank 2n + 2 bundle S V −→ M .
In the sequel we make extensive use of covariant derivatives with respect to the canonical connection of the line-bundle L . Let us review its normalization. As it is well known there exists a correspondence between line-bundles and U(1)-bundles. If exp[fαβ (z)] is the transition function between two local trivializations of the line-bundle L −→ M , the transition function in the corresponding principal U(1)- bundle U −→ M is just exp[i Im fαβ (z)] and the Kähler potentials in two different charts are related by: Kβ = Kα + fαβ + f αβ . At the level of connections this correspondence is formulated by setting: U(1)-connection ≡ Q = Im θ = − 2i (θ − θ ). If we apply this formula to the case of the U(1)-bundle U −→ M associated with
the line-bundle L whose first Chern class equals the Kähler class, we get: |
|
||||
|
i |
|
|
|
|
Q = − |
|
∂i K dzi − ∂i K dz |
i |
|
(8.5.8) |
2 |
Let now Φ(z, z) be a section of U p . By definition its covariant derivative is Φ = (d + ipQ)Φ or, in components,
i Φ = ∂i + |
2 p∂i K Φ; |
i Φ = ∂i − |
2 p∂i K Φ |
(8.5.9) |
||
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|

326 |
8 Supergravity: A Bestiary in Diverse Dimensions |
A covariantly holomorphic section of U is defined by the equation: i Φ = 0. We can easily map each section Φ(z, z) of U p into a section of the line-bundle L by setting:
Φ = e−pK /2Φ |
(8.5.10) |
With this position we obtain:
i Φ = (∂i + p∂i K )Φ; i Φ = ∂i Φ |
(8.5.11) |
Under the map of (8.5.10) covariantly holomorphic sections of U flow into holomorphic sections of L and vice-versa.
8.5.3 Special Kähler Manifolds
We are now ready to give the first of two equivalent definitions of special Kähler manifolds:
Definition 8.5.1 A Hodge Kähler manifold is Special Kähler (of the local type) if there exists a completely symmetric holomorphic 3-index section Wij k of (T M )3 L 2 (and its antiholomorphic conjugate Wi j k ) such that the following identity is satisfied by the Riemann tensor of the Levi-Civita connection:
∂m Wij k = 0; |
∂mWi j k = 0 |
|
[mWi]j k = 0; |
[mWi ]j k = 0 |
(8.5.12) |
Ri j k = g j gki + g k gj i − e2K Wi s Wtkj gs t |
|
In the above equations denotes the covariant derivative with respect to both the Levi-Civita and the U(1) holomorphic connection of (8.5.8). In the case of Wij k , the U(1) weight is p = 2.
Out of the Wij k we can construct covariantly holomorphic sections of weight 2 and −2 by setting:
Cij k = Wij k eK ; Ci j k = Wi j k eK |
(8.5.13) |
The flat bundle mentioned in the previous subsection apparently does not appear in this definition of special geometry. Yet it is there. It is indeed the essential ingredient in the second definition whose equivalence to the first we shall shortly provide.
Let L −→ M denote the complex line bundle whose first Chern class equals the Kähler form K of an n-dimensional Hodge-Kähler manifold M . Let S V −→ M denote a holomorphic flat vector bundle of rank 2n + 2 with structural group Sp(2n + 2, R). Consider tensor bundles of the type H = S V L . A typical holomorphic section of such a bundle will be denoted by Ω and will have the following

8.5 Summary of Special Kähler Geometry |
|
327 |
|
structure: |
|
|
|
XΛ |
|
Λ, Σ = 0, 1, . . . , n |
|
Ω = FΣ |
(8.5.14) |
By definition the transition functions between two local trivializations Ui M and Uj M of the bundle H have the following form:
X |
|
X |
|
|
F |
= efij Mij F |
(8.5.15) |
||
|
i |
|
|
j |
where fij are holomorphic maps Ui ∩ Uj → C while Mij is a constant Sp(2n + 2, R) matrix. For a consistent definition of the bundle the transition functions are obviously subject to the cocycle condition on a triple overlap: efij +fj k +fki = 1 and
Mij Mj k Mki = 1.
Let i | ! be the compatible Hermitian metric on H |
|
|
||||
i Ω | Ω! ≡ −iΩT |
1 |
0 |
Ω |
(8.5.16) |
||
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
|
|
−
Definition 8.5.2 We say that a Hodge-Kähler manifold M is special Kähler if there exists a bundle H of the type described above such that for some section Ω Γ (H , M ) the Kähler two form is given by:
K = |
i |
|
2π ∂∂ log i Ω | Ω! |
(8.5.17) |
From the point of view of local properties, (8.5.17) implies that we have an expression for the Kähler potential in terms of the holomorphic section Ω:
K = − log i Ω | |
|
! = − log i |
|
ΛFΛ − |
|
Σ XΣ |
(8.5.18) |
Ω |
X |
F |
The relation between the two definitions of special manifolds is obtained by introducing a non-holomorphic section of the bundle H according to:
LΛ |
|
≡ eK /2Ω = eK /2 |
XΛ |
|
|
||||
V = MΣ |
FΣ |
(8.5.19) |
|||||||
so that (8.5.18) becomes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 = i V | |
|
! = i |
|
ΛMΛ − |
|
Σ LΣ |
|
(8.5.20) |
|
V |
L |
M |
|
Since V is related to a holomorphic section by (8.5.19) it immediately follows that:
|
|
1 |
|
|
i V = |
∂i − |
2 |
∂i K V = 0 |
(8.5.21) |

328 |
8 Supergravity: A Bestiary in Diverse Dimensions |
On the other hand, from (8.5.20), defining:
Ui = i V = ∂i + 2 ∂i K |
||||||
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
U i = i V = |
∂i + 2 ∂i |
|||||
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
it follows that:
Λ
V ≡ fi
hΣ|i
(8.5.22)
23
K |
|
|
|
|
|
iΛ |
|
|
≡ |
f |
|
||||
V |
|
||||||
h |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Σ|i |
|
i Uj = iCij k gk |
|
|
(8.5.23) |
U |
where i denotes the covariant derivative containing both the Levi-Civita connection on the bundle T M and the canonical connection θ on the line bundle L . In (8.5.23) the symbol Cij k denotes a covariantly holomorphic ( Cij k = 0) section of the bundle T M 3 L 2 that is totally symmetric in its indices. This tensor can be identified with the tensor of (8.5.13) appearing in (8.5.12). Alternatively, the set of differential equations:
i V = Ui |
(8.5.24) |
i Uj = iCij k gk U |
(8.5.25) |
i Uj = gi j V |
(8.5.26) |
i V = 0 |
(8.5.27) |
with V satisfying (8.5.19), (8.5.20) give yet another definition of special geometry. In particular it is easy to find (8.5.12) as integrability conditions of (8.5.27).
8.5.4 The Vector Kinetic Matrix NΛΣ in Special Geometry
In the bosonic supergravity action (8.4.1) we do not see sections of any symplectic bundle over the scalar manifold but we see the real and imaginary parts of the matrix NΛΣ necessary in order to write the kinetic terms of the vector fields. Special geometry enters precisely at this level, since it is utilized to define such a matrix. Explicitly NΛΣ which, in relation with its interpretation in the case of Calabi-Yau three-folds, is named the period matrix, is defined by means of the following relations:
MΛ = |
|
ΛΣ |
|
Σ ; hΣ|i = |
|
ΛΣ fiΣ |
(8.5.28) |
N |
L |
N |
which can be solved introducing the two (n + 1) × (n + 1) vectors
23
I = |
f Λ |
|
Λ|I = |
h |
|
|||
LΛ ; |
|
MΛ |
||||||
f Λ |
i |
h |
|
|
Λ |
|i |
(8.5.29) |
|
|
|
|
|
|