- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •2.1 Introduction and a Short History of Black Holes
- •2.2 The Kruskal Extension of Schwarzschild Space-Time
- •2.2.1 Analysis of the Rindler Space-Time
- •2.2.2 Applying the Same Procedure to the Schwarzschild Metric
- •2.2.3 A First Analysis of Kruskal Space-Time
- •2.3 Basic Concepts about Future, Past and Causality
- •2.3.1 The Light-Cone
- •2.3.2 Future and Past of Events and Regions
- •Achronal Sets
- •Time-Orientability
- •Domains of Dependence
- •Cauchy surfaces
- •2.4.1 Conformal Mapping of Minkowski Space into the Einstein Static Universe
- •2.4.2 Asymptotic Flatness
- •2.5 The Causal Boundary of Kruskal Space-Time
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 The Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.2.1 Riemann and Ricci Curvatures of the Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.3 The Static Limit in Kerr-Newman Space-Time
- •Static Observers
- •3.4 The Horizon and the Ergosphere
- •The Horizon Area
- •3.5 Geodesics of the Kerr Metric
- •3.5.2 The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation and the Carter Constant
- •3.5.3 Reduction to First Order Equations
- •3.5.4 The Exact Solution of the Schwarzschild Orbit Equation as an Application
- •3.5.5 About Explicit Kerr Geodesics
- •3.6 The Kerr Black Hole and the Laws of Thermodynamics
- •3.6.1 The Penrose Mechanism
- •3.6.2 The Bekenstein Hawking Entropy and Hawking Radiation
- •References
- •4.1 Historical Introduction to Modern Cosmology
- •4.2 The Universe Is a Dynamical System
- •4.3 Expansion of the Universe
- •4.3.1 Why the Night is Dark and Olbers Paradox
- •4.3.2 Hubble, the Galaxies and the Great Debate
- •4.3.4 The Big Bang
- •4.4 The Cosmological Principle
- •4.5 The Cosmic Background Radiation
- •4.6 The New Scenario of the Inflationary Universe
- •4.7 The End of the Second Millennium and the Dawn of the Third Bring Great News in Cosmology
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Mathematical Interlude: Isometries and the Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.1 Isometries and Killing Vector Fields
- •5.2.2 Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3 The Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.1 Infinitesimal Transformations and Killing Vectors
- •5.2.3.2 Vielbeins, Connections and Metrics on G/H
- •5.2.3.3 Lie Derivatives
- •5.2.3.4 Invariant Metrics on Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.5 For Spheres and Pseudo-Spheres
- •5.3 Homogeneity Without Isotropy: What Might Happen
- •5.3.1 Bianchi Spaces and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.1.1 Bianchi Type I and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.2.1 A Ricci Flat Bianchi II Metric
- •5.3.3 Einstein Equation and Matter for This Billiard
- •5.3.4 The Same Billiard with Some Matter Content
- •5.3.5 Three-Space Geometry of This Toy Model
- •5.4 The Standard Cosmological Model: Isotropic and Homogeneous Metrics
- •5.4.1 Viewing the Coset Manifolds as Group Manifolds
- •5.5 Friedman Equations for the Scale Factor and the Equation of State
- •5.5.1 Proof of the Cosmological Red-Shift
- •5.5.2 Solution of the Cosmological Differential Equations for Dust and Radiation Without a Cosmological Constant
- •5.5.3 Embedding Cosmologies into de Sitter Space
- •5.6 General Consequences of Friedman Equations
- •5.6.1 Particle Horizon
- •5.6.2 Event Horizon
- •5.6.3 Red-Shift Distances
- •5.7 Conceptual Problems of the Standard Cosmological Model
- •5.8 Cosmic Evolution with a Scalar Field: The Basis for Inflation
- •5.8.1 de Sitter Solution
- •5.8.2 Slow-Rolling Approximate Solutions
- •5.8.2.1 Number of e-Folds
- •5.9 Primordial Perturbations of the Cosmological Metric and of the Inflaton
- •5.9.1 The Conformal Frame
- •5.9.2 Deriving the Equations for the Perturbation
- •5.9.2.1 Meaning of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.2.2 Evaluation of the Effective Mass Term in the Slow Roll Approximation
- •5.9.2.3 Derivation of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.3 Quantization of the Scalar Degree of Freedom
- •5.9.4 Calculation of the Power Spectrum in the Two Regimes
- •5.9.4.1 Short Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.2 Long Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.3 Gluing the Long and Short Wave-Length Solutions Together
- •5.9.4.4 The Spectral Index
- •5.10 The Anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background
- •5.10.1 The Sachs-Wolfe Effect
- •5.10.2 The Two-Point Temperature Correlation Function
- •5.10.3 Conclusive Remarks on CMB Anisotropies
- •References
- •6.1 Historical Outline and Introduction
- •6.1.1 Fermionic Strings and the Birth of Supersymmetry
- •6.1.2 Supersymmetry
- •6.1.3 Supergravity
- •6.2 Algebro-Geometric Structure of Supergravity
- •6.3 Free Differential Algebras
- •6.3.1 Chevalley Cohomology
- •Contraction and Lie Derivative
- •Definition of FDA
- •Classification of FDA and the Analogue of Levi Theorem: Minimal Versus Contractible Algebras
- •6.4 The Super FDA of M Theory and Its Cohomological Structure
- •6.4.1 The Minimal FDA of M-Theory and Cohomology
- •6.4.2 FDA Equivalence with Larger (Super) Lie Algebras
- •6.5 The Principle of Rheonomy
- •6.5.1 The Flow Chart for the Construction of a Supergravity Theory
- •6.6 Summary of Supergravities
- •Type IIA Super-Poicaré Algebra in the String Frame
- •The FDA Extension of the Type IIA Superalgebra in the String Frame
- •The Bianchi Identities
- •6.7.1 Rheonomic Parameterizations of the Type IIA Curvatures in the String Frame
- •Bosonic Curvatures
- •Fermionic Curvatures
- •6.7.2 Field Equations of Type IIA Supergravity in the String Frame
- •6.8 Type IIB Supergravity
- •SL(2, R) Lie Algebra
- •Coset Representative of SL(2, R)/O(2) in the Solvable Parameterization
- •The SU(1, 1)/U(1) Vielbein and Connection
- •6.8.2 The Free Differential Algebra, the Supergravity Fields and the Curvatures
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Complex Basis
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Real Basis
- •6.8.3 The Bosonic Field Equations and the Standard Form of the Bosonic Action
- •6.9 About Solutions
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction and Conceptual Outline
- •7.2 p-Branes as World Volume Gauge-Theories
- •7.4 The New First Order Formalism
- •7.4.1 An Alternative to the Polyakov Action for p-Branes
- •7.6 The D3-Brane: Summary
- •7.9 Domain Walls in Diverse Space-Time Dimensions
- •7.9.1 The Randall Sundrum Mechanism
- •7.9.2 The Conformal Gauge for Domain Walls
- •7.10 Conclusion on This Brane Bestiary
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Supergravity and Homogeneous Scalar Manifolds G/H
- •8.2.3 Scalar Manifolds of Maximal Supergravities in Diverse Dimensions
- •8.3 Duality Symmetries in Even Dimensions
- •8.3.1 The Kinetic Matrix N and Symplectic Embeddings
- •8.3.2 Symplectic Embeddings in General
- •8.5 Summary of Special Kähler Geometry
- •8.5.1 Hodge-Kähler Manifolds
- •8.5.2 Connection on the Line Bundle
- •8.5.3 Special Kähler Manifolds
- •8.6 Supergravities in Five Dimension and More Scalar Geometries
- •8.6.1 Very Special Geometry
- •8.6.3 Quaternionic Geometry
- •8.6.4 Quaternionic, Versus HyperKähler Manifolds
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Black Holes Once Again
- •9.2.2 The Oxidation Rules
- •Orbit of Solutions
- •The Schwarzschild Case
- •The Extremal Reissner Nordström Case
- •Curvature of the Extremal Spaces
- •9.2.4 Attractor Mechanism, the Entropy and Other Special Geometry Invariants
- •9.2.5 Critical Points of the Geodesic Potential and Attractors
- •At BPS Attractor Points
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type I
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type II
- •9.2.6.2 The Quartic Invariant
- •9.2.7.1 An Explicit Example of Exact Regular BPS Solution
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •9.2.9 Resuming the Discussion of Critical Points
- •Non-BPS Case
- •BPS Case
- •9.2.10 An Example of a Small Black Hole
- •The Metric
- •The Complex Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Charges
- •Structure of the Charges and Attractor Mechanism
- •9.2.11 Behavior of the Riemann Tensor in Regular Solutions
- •9.3.4 The SO(8) Spinor Bundle and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.5 The Well Adapted Basis of Gamma Matrices
- •9.3.6 The so(8)-Connection and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.7 The Holonomy Tensor and Superspace
- •9.3.8 Gauged Maurer Cartan 1-Forms of OSp(8|4)
- •9.3.9 Killing Spinors of the AdS4 Manifold
- •9.3.10 Supergauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.3.11 The 3-Form
- •9.4.1 Maurer Cartan Forms of OSp(6|4)
- •9.4.2 Explicit Construction of the P3 Geometry
- •9.4.3 The Compactification Ansatz
- •9.4.4 Killing Spinors on P3
- •9.4.5 Gauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.4.6 Gauge Completion of the B[2] Form
- •9.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 The Legacy of Volume 1
- •10.2 The Story Told in Volume 2
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Auxiliary Tools for p-Brane Actions
- •B.1 Notations and Conventions
- •Appendix C: Auxiliary Information About Some Superalgebras
- •C.1.1 The Superalgebra
- •C.2 The Relevant Supercosets and Their Relation
- •C.2.1 Finite Supergroup Elements
- •C.4 An so(6) Inversion Formula
- •Appendix D: MATHEMATICA Package NOVAMANIFOLDA
- •Coset Manifolds (Euclidian Signature)
- •Instructions for the Use
- •Description of the Main Commands of RUNCOSET
- •Structure Constants for CP2
- •Spheres
- •N010 Coset
- •RUNCOSET Package (Euclidian Signature)
- •Main
- •Spin Connection and Curvature Routines
- •Routine Curvapack
- •Routine Curvapackgen
- •Contorsion Routine for Mixed Vielbeins
- •Calculation of the Contorsion for General Manifolds
- •Calculation for Cartan Maurer Equations and Vielbein Differentials (Euclidian Signature)
- •Routine Thoft
- •AdS Space in Four Dimensions (Minkowski Signature)
- •Lie Algebra of SO(2, 3) and Killing Metric
- •Solvable Subalgebra Generating the Coset and Construction of the Vielbein
- •Killing Vectors
- •Trigonometric Coordinates
- •Test of Killing Vectors
- •MANIFOLDPROVA
- •The 4-Dimensional Coset CP2
- •Calculation of the (Pseudo-)Riemannian Geometry of a Kasner Metric in Vielbein Formalism
- •References
- •Index
7.6 The D3-Brane: Summary |
287 |
and
F7F7 = − 1 Fij Fkl εij kl 1 = −ω[0]1
8
(7.5.31)
F72 + F72 = 1 Tr F 2 1
2
7.6 The D3-Brane: Summary
In the previous sections we have explained how to construct p-brane world volume actions that allow to reproduce the Born-Infeld second order action via the elimination of a set composed by three auxiliary fields:
•Πia ,
•hij (symmetric),
•F ij (antisymmetric).
Distinctive properties of this formulation are:
1.All fermion fields are implicitly hidden inside the definition of the p-form potentials of supergravity.
2.κ-supersymmetry is easily proven from supergravity rheonomic parameterization.
3.The action is manifestly covariant with respect to the duality group SL(2, R) of type IIB supergravity.
4.The action functional can be computed on any background which is an exact solution of the supergravity bulk equations.
Of specific interest in applications are precisely the last two properties. Putting together all the partial results we can summarize the D3 brane action as it follows:
L = Πia V b ηab ηi 1 e 2 · · · e 4 ε 1... 4
− |
1 |
a |
b |
ηab hij e 1 |
· · · e 4 ε 1... 4 |
|
Πi |
Πj |
|||
8 |
−1 det h−1 + √Im N F 1/2e 1 · · · e 4 ε 1... 4
4
|
+ |
3 |
F ij F[2] e 3 e 4 εij 3 4 |
(7.6.1) |
|||||
|
4 |
||||||||
|
|
|
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
||
|
+ |
|
Re N F[2] F[2] + i |
|
q |
α εαβ Aβ F[2] + 6C[4] |
|
||
|
4 |
4 |
|
||||||
F[2] ≡ dA[1] + qα Aα |
|
|
|||||||
N = |
i Λ−1 |
− Λ−2 |
|
|
|||||
|
Λ−1 |
+ Λ−2 |
|
|
|
288 |
7 The Branes: Three Viewpoints |
7.7Supergravity p-Branes as Classical Solitons: General
Aspects
We turn next to consider p-branes as classical solitonic solutions of supergravity. Such solutions have the following form:
|
D |
|
D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
μ |
|
|
|
( 1)p+1 |
aφ |
p 2 2 |
|
= 4 d |
|
√−g[2R[g] + |
|
φ∂μφ |
+ |
|||||||||||||||||
Ap[ -brane] |
D |
x |
2 |
∂ |
μ |
2−(p+2)! e− |
|
|F[ + ]| ] elec. |
|||||||||||||||
|
D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A[ ] |
|
|
√ |
|
2R g |
] + |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
d x |
g |
2 |
∂ φ∂μφ |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
p-brane |
= 4 |
( 1)D−−p˜−3[ |
|
[ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
˜ |
|
aφ |
|
|
D p 2 2 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
+ |
2−(D |
p |
2) |
! |
e− |
|
| |
F[ |
|
− ˜− ] |
| ] |
|
|
|
magn. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
− ˜− |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.7.1)
where in both cases F[n] ≡ dA[n−1] is the field strength of an (n − 1)-form gauge potential and a is some real number whose profound meaning will become clear in the later discussion of the solutions. As the reader can notice the two formulae we
[D]
have written for the p-brane action are actually the same formula since Ap-brane and
[D]
A ˜- are mapped into each other by the replacement:
p brane
p˜ = D − 4 − p; p = D − 4 − p˜ |
(7.7.2) |
The reason why we doubled our writing is that the essentially unique action (7.7.1) admits two classical solutions each of which is interpreted as describing a p- extended and a p˜-extended object respectively. The first solution is driven by an electric F[p+2] form, while the second is driven by a magnetic F[D−p+2] form. The
[D]
role of electric and magnetic solutions of the action Ap-brane are interchanged as
[D]
solutions of the dual action A ˜- For various values of
p brane
n = p + 2 and a |
(7.7.3) |
[D]
the functional Ap-brane (or its dual) corresponds to a consistent truncation of some supergravity bosonic action SDSUGRA in dimension D. This is the reason why the classical configurations we are going to describe are generically named supergravity p-branes. Given that supergravity is the low energy limit of superstring theory, supergravity p-branes are also solutions of superstring theory. They can be approximate or exact solutions, depending whether they do or do not receive quantum corrections. The second case is clearly the most interesting one and occurs, in particular, when the supergravity p-brane is a BPS-state that preserves some amount of supersymmetry. This implies that it is part of a short supersymmetry multiplet and for this reason cannot be renormalized. By consistent truncation we mean that a subset of the bosonic fields have been put equal to zero but in such a way that all solutions of the truncated action are also solutions of the complete one. For instance if we choose:
a = 1; n = 3 (7.7.4)
7
7.7 Supergravity p-Branes as Classical Solitons: General Aspects |
289 |
(7.7.1) corresponds to the bosonic low energy action of D = 10 heterotic superstring (N = 1, supergravity) where the E8 × E8 gauge fields have been deleted. The two choices 3 or 7 in (7.7.4) correspond to the two formulations (electric/magnetic) of the theory. Other choices correspond to truncations of the type IIA or type IIB action in the various intermediate dimensions 4 ≤ D ≤ 10. Since the (n − 1)-form A[n−1] couples to the world volume of an extended object of dimension:
p = n − 2 |
(7.7.5) |
namely a p-brane, the choice of the truncated action (7.7.1) is precisely motivated by the search for p-brane solutions of supergravity. According with the interpretation (7.7.5) we set:
n |
= |
p |
+ |
2 |
; |
d |
= |
p |
+ |
1 |
; |
˜ = |
D |
− |
p |
− 3 |
(7.7.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
d |
|
|
where d is the world-volume dimension of an electrically charged elementary p-
brane solution, while ˜ is the world-volume dimension of a magnetically charged d
solitonic p˜-brane with p˜ = D − p − 4. The distinction between elementary and solitonic is the following. In the elementary case the field configuration we shall discuss is a true vacuum solution of the field equations following from the action (7.7.1) everywhere in D-dimensional space-time except for a singular locus of dimension d. This locus can be interpreted as the location of an elementary p-brane source that is coupled to supergravity via an electric charge spread over its own world volume. In the solitonic case, the field configuration we shall consider is instead a bona-fide solution of the supergravity field equations everywhere in space-time without the need to postulate external elementary sources. The field energy is however concentrated around a locus of dimension p˜. These solutions have been derived and discussed thoroughly in the literature [41]. Good reviews of such results are [41, 42]. Defining:
2 |
d ˜ |
|
|
||
= a + 2 D |
d |
2 |
(7.7.7) |
||
− |
|||||
|
|
|
|
it was shown in [41] that the action (7.7.1) admits the following elementary p-brane solution
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 ˜ |
|
|
|
|
|
4d |
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
|
d |
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ds2 |
H (y)− Δ(D−2) dxμ |
dxν ημν |
H (y) Δ(D−2) dym |
dyn δmn |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
F[p+2] = |
2 |
(−)p+1εμ1...μp+1 dxμ1 |
· · · dxμp+1 d H (y)−1 |
|
||||||||||||
|
√ |
|
(7.7.8) |
|||||||||||||
|
|
eφ(r) = H (y)− 2a
where the coordinates XM (M = 0, 1 . . . , D − 1) have been split into two subsets:
•xμ, (μ = 0, . . . , p) are the coordinates on the p-brane world-volume,
•ym, (m = D − d + 1, . . . , D) are the coordinates transverse to the brane
290 |
|
|
|
7 The Branes: Three Viewpoints |
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
k |
||||
H (y) = |
1 + |
(7.7.9) |
|||
|
|
||||
|
d |
||||
|
|
r |
˜ |
|
is a harmonic function ∂m ∂m H (y) = 0 in the transverse space to the brane-world
√ ∂y ∂y
volume. By r ≡ ymym we have denoted the radial distance from the brane and by k the value of its electric charge. The same authors of [41] show that the action (7.7.1) admits also the following solitonic p˜-brane solution:
|
|
|
= |
|
|
4 d |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
− |
|
|
ds2 |
H (y)− Δ(D−2) |
dxμ |
dxν ημν |
H (y) |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
D |
p |
2 |
= |
|
|
|
|
μ1 |
· · · |
|
μd |
yp |
|||
|
|
˜ |
|
rd |
2 |
||||||||||
F [ |
− |
− ] |
λεμ1 |
|
|
dx |
˜ |
||||||||
|
...μd p dx |
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eφ(r) |
|
|
2a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
= H (y) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where the (D − p − 2)-form F [D−p−2] is the dual of charge and:
dk λ = −2 √
4 ˜ d
Δ(D−2) dym dyn δmn
(7.7.10)
F[p+2], k is now the magnetic
(7.7.11)
The identification (7.7.11) of the constant λ allows to write the expression of the form F [D−p−2] in the solitonic solution in the following more compact and inspiring way:
2 |
(7.7.12) |
|
F [D−p−2] = √ |
dH (y) |
These p-brane configurations are solutions of the second order field equations obtained by varying the action (7.7.1). However, when (7.7.1) is the truncation of a supergravity action it generically happens that both (7.7.8) and (7.7.10) are also the solutions of a first order differential system of equations ensuring that they are BPS-extremal p-branes preserving a fraction of the original supersymmetries. The parameter (7.7.7) plays a particularly important role as an intrinsic characterization of the brane solutions since it has the very important property of being invariant under toroidal compactifications. When we step down in dimensions compactifying on a Tx torus each p-brane solution of the D-dimensional supergravity ends up in a p brane of the D − x supergravity that has the same value of its parent brane had in higher dimension. It also happens that all elementary BPS branes of string or M-theory as the various Dp-branes of the type II A or type II B theory, the M2 and M5 branes, the Neveu Schwarz 5-brane and the elementary type II or heterotic strings are characterized by the property that = 4. Namely we have:
= 4 elementary p-brane in D = 10 or toroidal reduction thereof (7.7.13)
7.8 The Near Brane Geometry, Dual Frame and AdS/CFT Correspondence |
291 |
7.8The Near Brane Geometry, the Dual Frame and the AdS/CFT Correspondence
For the string theory community, the most exciting new development in the last decade of the XXth century was the discovery of the AdS/CFT correspondence [44– 46], between the superconformal quantum field theory describing the microscopic degrees of freedom of certain p-branes and classical supergravity compactified on AdSp+2 × XD−p−2. The origin of this correspondence is two-fold. On one side we have the algebraic truth that the AdSp+2 isometry group, namely SO(2, p + 1) is also the conformal group in p + 1 dimensions and, as firstly noticed by the authors of [45, 46], this extends also to the corresponding supersymmetric extensions appropriate to the field theories living on the relevant brane volumes. On the other hand we have the special behavior of those p-branes that are characterized by the conditions:
|
|
d ˜ |
|
|
|
|
= 4; |
a = 0 |
|
d |
|
= 2 |
(7.8.1) |
D |
− |
2 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this case the p-brane metric takes the form:
|
|
˜ |
|
d |
|
|
|
|
ds2 |
= H (r) − |
d |
dxμ dxν ημν + H (r) |
2 + r2dsS2D−p−2 |
|
(7.8.2) |
||
D−2 |
D−2 |
dr |
|
where the flat metric dm dym in the D − p − 1 dimensions has been written in polar coordinates using the metric dsS2D−p−2 on an SD−p−2 sphere and where the harmonic function is
H (r) = |
1 + |
k |
(7.8.3) |
|
|
|
|||
|
d |
|||
|
|
r |
˜ |
|
For large r → ∞ the metric (7.8.2) is asymptotically flat, but for small values of the radial distance from the brane r → 0 the metric becomes a direct product metric:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d |
|
|
d2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
d |
|
|
||||
|
2 |
r |
→ |
0 |
2 |
= (k)− |
|
˜ |
|
|
˜ |
|
|
μ |
dx |
ν |
ημν + (k) |
|
|
|
|
dr |
|
|
+(k) |
|
|
|
2 |
||||
|
|
|
D |
− |
2 |
|
D |
− |
2 |
|
D |
− |
2 |
|
|
|
|
D |
− |
2 |
|||||||||||||
ds |
|
= |
dsH |
|
|
r |
|
|
dx |
|
|
|
|
|
r2 |
|
|
dsSD−p−2 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AdSp+2 metric
(7.8.4) We will see shortly from now why the underbraced metric is indeed that of an anti de Sitter space. To this effect it suffices to set:
d/ |
(D |
−2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
r = (k) ˜ 2 |
|
|
exp −(k)−d/2(D−2)r |
|
(7.8.5) |
and in the new variable r the underbraced metric of (7.8.4) becomes identical to the metric (7.9.14) with
|
d/2(D |
|
2) |
d2 |
|
|
|
λ = (k)− |
− |
˜ |
|
(7.8.6) |
|||
|
|
2(D |
− |
2) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The metric (7.9.14) is indeed the AdS metric in horospherical coordinates. Hence the near brane geometry of the special p-branes satisfying condition (7.8.1) is