Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
FREGRAVOL2.pdf
Скачиваний:
71
Добавлен:
05.06.2015
Размер:
8.65 Mб
Скачать

296

7 The Branes: Three Viewpoints

7.9.2 The Conformal Gauge for Domain Walls

Going back to the general domain wall solution (7.9.6), (7.9.7), (7.9.8), (7.9.9), classified by the value of (7.9.10) we observe that there is still an ambiguity in the powers of the harmonic function (7.9.8) that appear as metric coefficients. This ambiguity is due to coordinate transformations and it is a specific property of (D 2)-branes not present in other p-branes, where the harmonic function H is not a linear function. Following a discussion by Bergshoeff and van der Schaar [57] we observe that in the range y > 0 we can make the following linear transformation:

y= − Qc + y H (y) = Qy that eliminates the integration constant c. Furthermore we can redefine y as some other fractional power of a third coordinate y, namely

y= −Q1+ε ε y1ε , then shifting it once again by a constant y = z + Qc . Altogether this means that we introduce the coordinate transformation:

y = − Q

Q

+ε

z + Q

1

 

c

1

ε

 

c

ε

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Under this transformation we have (for positive y):

= − 1

H (y) H (z)

and the domain wall metric (7.9.6) becomes:

 

 

2α

 

2β ε

 

dz2

dsDW2

= H (z)

ε

dxμ dxν ημν + H (z)

ε+

2

 

ε2

(7.9.26)

(7.9.27)

(7.9.28)

This transformation allows for the remarkable possibility of choosing a conformal gauge, namely a coordinate system where it becomes manifest that the domain wall metric is conformally flat. Indeed it suffices to impose that the two powers of the harmonic function appearing in (7.9.28) be equal:

2α

= −

2β + ε

2

(7.9.29)

ε

 

 

 

ε

 

Using (7.9.9) the solution of (7.9.29) for ε is unique in all cases with the exception of = −2:

ε

= −

+ 2

(7.9.30)

 

Hence for = −2, redefining z εz, Q k|ε| the domain wall solution (7.9.6) can always be rewritten in the following conformally flat way:

 

= H (z)

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

ημν dx

μ

dx

ν

+ dz

2

 

dsDW/conf

2a2

)(Δ

+2

)

2

 

 

(D

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

eφ(z) = H (z)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

+2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7.9.31)

H (z) = 1 + k|z|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

k = + 2)

 

 

Λ

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

+

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.9 Domain Walls in Diverse Space-Time Dimensions

297

Obviously the solution (7.9.31) could have been obtained by directly solving the Einstein equations associated with the action (7.9.5) starting from a conformal ansatz of the type:

dsDW2 /conf = exp A(z) ημν dxμ dxν + dz2

(7.9.32)

Yet we preferred to obtain it from the general solution (7.7.8) for supergravity p- branes in order to emphasize its interpretation as a domain wall, namely a (D 2)- brane. The direct method of solution can be used to find the conformal representation of the domain wall metric in the exceptional case = −2. As shown in [60] one obtains:

ds2 = e

2k

|z| ημν dxμ dxν + dz2

 

d2

 

 

 

k

 

2

 

φ =

 

|z|

(7.9.33)

d 2

where k is now given by

 

 

k2 = −2Λ(d 2)

(7.9.34)

which is real for negative Λ. There is another important point that we should note. Our starting point, prior to all the subsequent manipulations, has been the form (7.9.6), (7.9.9) which is that of an electric p-brane and not that of a solitonic one (see 7.7.10)). This implies that our domain wall solutions are not exactly bona fide solutions of the action (7.9.5) but require also the coupling to a source term that is the world-volume action of the domain wall, localized at z = 0 in the last coordinate frame we have used. Namely the true action is

A = M

 

dD x g 2R[g] +

2

μφ∂μφ 2Λe

+ T W V

dD1ξ Lsource

 

D

 

 

 

1

 

 

D1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7.9.35) where Lsource is world-volume Lagrangian of the (D 2)-brane and the parameter T denotes its tension. An important issue is to relate the wall-tension to the parameters appearing in the classical domain wall solution. This was done in [60] following a standard analysis developed in previous papers [58, 59]. The matching conditions across the singular domain wall source imply that the energy density (tension) of the wall is related to the values of the cosmological constant parameters on either side of the wall, namely the authors of [60] found:

σ = T = 2 Az=0Az=0+

 

(7.9.36)

where the prime denotes a derivative with respect to z. This leads to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

= −

2

:

T

= −

8 sign k(Δ

+

2)

Λ

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7.9.37)

= −2

:

T =

8k

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

d

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

298

7 The Branes: Three Viewpoints

Fig. 7.3 The volcano potential

Thus positive-tension domain-wall solutions exist for ≤ −2 with k > 0 and for > 2 with k < 0. Conversely, negative-tension domain walls arise for ≤ −2 with k < 0 and for > 2 with k > 0. So for our domain walls with ≤ −2, we assume the lower bound (7.9.11). To avoid naked singularities we also need k > 0. Using the simple conformal gauge (7.9.31) the authors of [60] have analyzed the fluctuations of the metric around such a background and have found that the graviton wave function obeys, as predicted by Randall-Sundrum [6163] a Schrödinger equation with a potential that is completely fixed by the value of . More precisely one finds that in the conformal gauge the fluctuations of the D-dimensional graviton

satisfy the Klein-Gordon equation of a scalar field in the gravitational background

namely M (ggMN N Φ) = 0. Parameterizing:

 

Φ = φ(z)eip·x = ekzψ(z)eip·x

(7.9.38)

where p is the (D 1)-dimensional momentum the Klein-Gordon equation becomes the following Schrödinger-type equation,

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

p2ψ

 

 

 

 

 

 

ψ

 

+ U ψ = −

 

 

(7.9.39)

 

 

 

2

2

 

where the potential, calculated in [60] is given by

 

 

= −

2

:

U

= −

 

+ 1)k2

 

k

δ(z)

 

 

 

 

+

 

 

 

2

+

2)2H (z)2 +

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7.9.40)

= −2

:

U =

k2

1

kδ(z)

 

 

8

 

2

 

 

Such an equation has a normalizable zero-mode wave function if the following condition is satisfied ≤ −2. Indeed it is evident from these expressions that for ≤ −2, U has a volcano shape as in Fig. 7.3 since the delta function has a negative coefficient, and the “bulk” term is non-negative for all z. Hence the trapping of

gravity occurs for positive tension (D 2)-branes in the following window:

AdS ≤ ≤ −2

(7.9.41)

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]