- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •2.1 Introduction and a Short History of Black Holes
- •2.2 The Kruskal Extension of Schwarzschild Space-Time
- •2.2.1 Analysis of the Rindler Space-Time
- •2.2.2 Applying the Same Procedure to the Schwarzschild Metric
- •2.2.3 A First Analysis of Kruskal Space-Time
- •2.3 Basic Concepts about Future, Past and Causality
- •2.3.1 The Light-Cone
- •2.3.2 Future and Past of Events and Regions
- •Achronal Sets
- •Time-Orientability
- •Domains of Dependence
- •Cauchy surfaces
- •2.4.1 Conformal Mapping of Minkowski Space into the Einstein Static Universe
- •2.4.2 Asymptotic Flatness
- •2.5 The Causal Boundary of Kruskal Space-Time
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 The Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.2.1 Riemann and Ricci Curvatures of the Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.3 The Static Limit in Kerr-Newman Space-Time
- •Static Observers
- •3.4 The Horizon and the Ergosphere
- •The Horizon Area
- •3.5 Geodesics of the Kerr Metric
- •3.5.2 The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation and the Carter Constant
- •3.5.3 Reduction to First Order Equations
- •3.5.4 The Exact Solution of the Schwarzschild Orbit Equation as an Application
- •3.5.5 About Explicit Kerr Geodesics
- •3.6 The Kerr Black Hole and the Laws of Thermodynamics
- •3.6.1 The Penrose Mechanism
- •3.6.2 The Bekenstein Hawking Entropy and Hawking Radiation
- •References
- •4.1 Historical Introduction to Modern Cosmology
- •4.2 The Universe Is a Dynamical System
- •4.3 Expansion of the Universe
- •4.3.1 Why the Night is Dark and Olbers Paradox
- •4.3.2 Hubble, the Galaxies and the Great Debate
- •4.3.4 The Big Bang
- •4.4 The Cosmological Principle
- •4.5 The Cosmic Background Radiation
- •4.6 The New Scenario of the Inflationary Universe
- •4.7 The End of the Second Millennium and the Dawn of the Third Bring Great News in Cosmology
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Mathematical Interlude: Isometries and the Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.1 Isometries and Killing Vector Fields
- •5.2.2 Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3 The Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.1 Infinitesimal Transformations and Killing Vectors
- •5.2.3.2 Vielbeins, Connections and Metrics on G/H
- •5.2.3.3 Lie Derivatives
- •5.2.3.4 Invariant Metrics on Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.5 For Spheres and Pseudo-Spheres
- •5.3 Homogeneity Without Isotropy: What Might Happen
- •5.3.1 Bianchi Spaces and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.1.1 Bianchi Type I and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.2.1 A Ricci Flat Bianchi II Metric
- •5.3.3 Einstein Equation and Matter for This Billiard
- •5.3.4 The Same Billiard with Some Matter Content
- •5.3.5 Three-Space Geometry of This Toy Model
- •5.4 The Standard Cosmological Model: Isotropic and Homogeneous Metrics
- •5.4.1 Viewing the Coset Manifolds as Group Manifolds
- •5.5 Friedman Equations for the Scale Factor and the Equation of State
- •5.5.1 Proof of the Cosmological Red-Shift
- •5.5.2 Solution of the Cosmological Differential Equations for Dust and Radiation Without a Cosmological Constant
- •5.5.3 Embedding Cosmologies into de Sitter Space
- •5.6 General Consequences of Friedman Equations
- •5.6.1 Particle Horizon
- •5.6.2 Event Horizon
- •5.6.3 Red-Shift Distances
- •5.7 Conceptual Problems of the Standard Cosmological Model
- •5.8 Cosmic Evolution with a Scalar Field: The Basis for Inflation
- •5.8.1 de Sitter Solution
- •5.8.2 Slow-Rolling Approximate Solutions
- •5.8.2.1 Number of e-Folds
- •5.9 Primordial Perturbations of the Cosmological Metric and of the Inflaton
- •5.9.1 The Conformal Frame
- •5.9.2 Deriving the Equations for the Perturbation
- •5.9.2.1 Meaning of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.2.2 Evaluation of the Effective Mass Term in the Slow Roll Approximation
- •5.9.2.3 Derivation of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.3 Quantization of the Scalar Degree of Freedom
- •5.9.4 Calculation of the Power Spectrum in the Two Regimes
- •5.9.4.1 Short Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.2 Long Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.3 Gluing the Long and Short Wave-Length Solutions Together
- •5.9.4.4 The Spectral Index
- •5.10 The Anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background
- •5.10.1 The Sachs-Wolfe Effect
- •5.10.2 The Two-Point Temperature Correlation Function
- •5.10.3 Conclusive Remarks on CMB Anisotropies
- •References
- •6.1 Historical Outline and Introduction
- •6.1.1 Fermionic Strings and the Birth of Supersymmetry
- •6.1.2 Supersymmetry
- •6.1.3 Supergravity
- •6.2 Algebro-Geometric Structure of Supergravity
- •6.3 Free Differential Algebras
- •6.3.1 Chevalley Cohomology
- •Contraction and Lie Derivative
- •Definition of FDA
- •Classification of FDA and the Analogue of Levi Theorem: Minimal Versus Contractible Algebras
- •6.4 The Super FDA of M Theory and Its Cohomological Structure
- •6.4.1 The Minimal FDA of M-Theory and Cohomology
- •6.4.2 FDA Equivalence with Larger (Super) Lie Algebras
- •6.5 The Principle of Rheonomy
- •6.5.1 The Flow Chart for the Construction of a Supergravity Theory
- •6.6 Summary of Supergravities
- •Type IIA Super-Poicaré Algebra in the String Frame
- •The FDA Extension of the Type IIA Superalgebra in the String Frame
- •The Bianchi Identities
- •6.7.1 Rheonomic Parameterizations of the Type IIA Curvatures in the String Frame
- •Bosonic Curvatures
- •Fermionic Curvatures
- •6.7.2 Field Equations of Type IIA Supergravity in the String Frame
- •6.8 Type IIB Supergravity
- •SL(2, R) Lie Algebra
- •Coset Representative of SL(2, R)/O(2) in the Solvable Parameterization
- •The SU(1, 1)/U(1) Vielbein and Connection
- •6.8.2 The Free Differential Algebra, the Supergravity Fields and the Curvatures
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Complex Basis
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Real Basis
- •6.8.3 The Bosonic Field Equations and the Standard Form of the Bosonic Action
- •6.9 About Solutions
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction and Conceptual Outline
- •7.2 p-Branes as World Volume Gauge-Theories
- •7.4 The New First Order Formalism
- •7.4.1 An Alternative to the Polyakov Action for p-Branes
- •7.6 The D3-Brane: Summary
- •7.9 Domain Walls in Diverse Space-Time Dimensions
- •7.9.1 The Randall Sundrum Mechanism
- •7.9.2 The Conformal Gauge for Domain Walls
- •7.10 Conclusion on This Brane Bestiary
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Supergravity and Homogeneous Scalar Manifolds G/H
- •8.2.3 Scalar Manifolds of Maximal Supergravities in Diverse Dimensions
- •8.3 Duality Symmetries in Even Dimensions
- •8.3.1 The Kinetic Matrix N and Symplectic Embeddings
- •8.3.2 Symplectic Embeddings in General
- •8.5 Summary of Special Kähler Geometry
- •8.5.1 Hodge-Kähler Manifolds
- •8.5.2 Connection on the Line Bundle
- •8.5.3 Special Kähler Manifolds
- •8.6 Supergravities in Five Dimension and More Scalar Geometries
- •8.6.1 Very Special Geometry
- •8.6.3 Quaternionic Geometry
- •8.6.4 Quaternionic, Versus HyperKähler Manifolds
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Black Holes Once Again
- •9.2.2 The Oxidation Rules
- •Orbit of Solutions
- •The Schwarzschild Case
- •The Extremal Reissner Nordström Case
- •Curvature of the Extremal Spaces
- •9.2.4 Attractor Mechanism, the Entropy and Other Special Geometry Invariants
- •9.2.5 Critical Points of the Geodesic Potential and Attractors
- •At BPS Attractor Points
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type I
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type II
- •9.2.6.2 The Quartic Invariant
- •9.2.7.1 An Explicit Example of Exact Regular BPS Solution
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •9.2.9 Resuming the Discussion of Critical Points
- •Non-BPS Case
- •BPS Case
- •9.2.10 An Example of a Small Black Hole
- •The Metric
- •The Complex Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Charges
- •Structure of the Charges and Attractor Mechanism
- •9.2.11 Behavior of the Riemann Tensor in Regular Solutions
- •9.3.4 The SO(8) Spinor Bundle and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.5 The Well Adapted Basis of Gamma Matrices
- •9.3.6 The so(8)-Connection and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.7 The Holonomy Tensor and Superspace
- •9.3.8 Gauged Maurer Cartan 1-Forms of OSp(8|4)
- •9.3.9 Killing Spinors of the AdS4 Manifold
- •9.3.10 Supergauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.3.11 The 3-Form
- •9.4.1 Maurer Cartan Forms of OSp(6|4)
- •9.4.2 Explicit Construction of the P3 Geometry
- •9.4.3 The Compactification Ansatz
- •9.4.4 Killing Spinors on P3
- •9.4.5 Gauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.4.6 Gauge Completion of the B[2] Form
- •9.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 The Legacy of Volume 1
- •10.2 The Story Told in Volume 2
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Auxiliary Tools for p-Brane Actions
- •B.1 Notations and Conventions
- •Appendix C: Auxiliary Information About Some Superalgebras
- •C.1.1 The Superalgebra
- •C.2 The Relevant Supercosets and Their Relation
- •C.2.1 Finite Supergroup Elements
- •C.4 An so(6) Inversion Formula
- •Appendix D: MATHEMATICA Package NOVAMANIFOLDA
- •Coset Manifolds (Euclidian Signature)
- •Instructions for the Use
- •Description of the Main Commands of RUNCOSET
- •Structure Constants for CP2
- •Spheres
- •N010 Coset
- •RUNCOSET Package (Euclidian Signature)
- •Main
- •Spin Connection and Curvature Routines
- •Routine Curvapack
- •Routine Curvapackgen
- •Contorsion Routine for Mixed Vielbeins
- •Calculation of the Contorsion for General Manifolds
- •Calculation for Cartan Maurer Equations and Vielbein Differentials (Euclidian Signature)
- •Routine Thoft
- •AdS Space in Four Dimensions (Minkowski Signature)
- •Lie Algebra of SO(2, 3) and Killing Metric
- •Solvable Subalgebra Generating the Coset and Construction of the Vielbein
- •Killing Vectors
- •Trigonometric Coordinates
- •Test of Killing Vectors
- •MANIFOLDPROVA
- •The 4-Dimensional Coset CP2
- •Calculation of the (Pseudo-)Riemannian Geometry of a Kasner Metric in Vielbein Formalism
- •References
- •Index
296 |
7 The Branes: Three Viewpoints |
7.9.2 The Conformal Gauge for Domain Walls
Going back to the general domain wall solution (7.9.6), (7.9.7), (7.9.8), (7.9.9), classified by the value of (7.9.10) we observe that there is still an ambiguity in the powers of the harmonic function (7.9.8) that appear as metric coefficients. This ambiguity is due to coordinate transformations and it is a specific property of (D − 2)-branes not present in other p-branes, where the harmonic function H is not a linear function. Following a discussion by Bergshoeff and van der Schaar [57] we observe that in the range y > 0 we can make the following linear transformation:
y= − Qc + y H (y) = Qy that eliminates the integration constant c. Furthermore we can redefine y as some other fractional power of a third coordinate y, namely
y= −Q− 1+ε ε y− 1ε , then shifting it once again by a constant y = z + Qc . Altogether this means that we introduce the coordinate transformation:
y = − Q |
− Q− |
+ε |
z + Q − |
1 |
|||
|
c |
1 |
ε |
|
c |
ε |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under this transformation we have (for positive y):
= − −1/ε
H (y) H (z)
and the domain wall metric (7.9.6) becomes:
|
|
2α |
|
2β ε |
|
dz2 |
dsDW2 |
= H (z)− |
ε |
dxμ dxν ημν + H (z)− |
ε+ |
−2 |
|
ε2 |
(7.9.26)
(7.9.27)
(7.9.28)
This transformation allows for the remarkable possibility of choosing a conformal gauge, namely a coordinate system where it becomes manifest that the domain wall metric is conformally flat. Indeed it suffices to impose that the two powers of the harmonic function appearing in (7.9.28) be equal:
− |
2α |
= − |
2β + ε |
− 2 |
(7.9.29) |
ε |
|
||||
|
|
ε |
|
Using (7.9.9) the solution of (7.9.29) for ε is unique in all cases with the exception of = −2:
ε |
= − |
+ 2 |
(7.9.30) |
|
Hence for = −2, redefining z → εz, Q → k|ε| the domain wall solution (7.9.6) can always be rewritten in the following conformally flat way:
|
= H (z) |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
ημν dx |
μ |
dx |
ν |
+ dz |
2 |
|
|||
dsDW/conf |
2a−2 |
)(Δ |
+2 |
) |
||||||||||||||
2 |
|
|
(D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
eφ(z) = H (z)− |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
+2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.9.31) |
|||||
H (z) = 1 + k|z| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
k = (Δ + 2) |
|
|
Λ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
+ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9 Domain Walls in Diverse Space-Time Dimensions |
297 |
Obviously the solution (7.9.31) could have been obtained by directly solving the Einstein equations associated with the action (7.9.5) starting from a conformal ansatz of the type:
dsDW2 /conf = exp A(z) ημν dxμ dxν + dz2 |
(7.9.32) |
Yet we preferred to obtain it from the general solution (7.7.8) for supergravity p- branes in order to emphasize its interpretation as a domain wall, namely a (D − 2)- brane. The direct method of solution can be used to find the conformal representation of the domain wall metric in the exceptional case = −2. As shown in [60] one obtains:
ds2 = e− |
2k |
|z| ημν dxμ dxν + dz2 |
|
|||||
d−2 |
|
|||||||
|
√ |
|
k |
|
||||
2 |
|
|||||||
φ = |
√ |
|
|z| |
(7.9.33) |
||||
d − 2 |
||||||||
where k is now given by |
|
|||||||
|
k2 = −2Λ(d − 2) |
(7.9.34) |
which is real for negative Λ. There is another important point that we should note. Our starting point, prior to all the subsequent manipulations, has been the form (7.9.6), (7.9.9) which is that of an electric p-brane and not that of a solitonic one (see 7.7.10)). This implies that our domain wall solutions are not exactly bona fide solutions of the action (7.9.5) but require also the coupling to a source term that is the world-volume action of the domain wall, localized at z = 0 in the last coordinate frame we have used. Namely the true action is
A = M |
|
dD x √−g 2R[g] + |
2 |
∂μφ∂μφ − 2Λe−aφ |
+ T W V |
dD−1ξ Lsource |
||
|
D |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
D−1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.9.35) where Lsource is world-volume Lagrangian of the (D − 2)-brane and the parameter T denotes its tension. An important issue is to relate the wall-tension to the parameters appearing in the classical domain wall solution. This was done in [60] following a standard analysis developed in previous papers [58, 59]. The matching conditions across the singular domain wall source imply that the energy density (tension) of the wall is related to the values of the cosmological constant parameters on either side of the wall, namely the authors of [60] found:
σ = T = 2 Az=0− − Az=0+ |
|
(7.9.36) |
|||||||||||||
where the prime denotes a derivative with respect to z. This leads to |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
= − |
2 |
: |
T |
= − |
8 sign k(Δ |
+ |
2) |
Λ |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.9.37) |
|||||||||
= −2 |
: |
T = |
8k |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
d |
− |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298 |
7 The Branes: Three Viewpoints |
Fig. 7.3 The volcano potential
Thus positive-tension domain-wall solutions exist for ≤ −2 with k > 0 and for > −2 with k < 0. Conversely, negative-tension domain walls arise for ≤ −2 with k < 0 and for > −2 with k > 0. So for our domain walls with ≤ −2, we assume the lower bound (7.9.11). To avoid naked singularities we also need k > 0. Using the simple conformal gauge (7.9.31) the authors of [60] have analyzed the fluctuations of the metric around such a background and have found that the graviton wave function obeys, as predicted by Randall-Sundrum [61–63] a Schrödinger equation with a potential that is completely fixed by the value of . More precisely one finds that in the conformal gauge the fluctuations of the D-dimensional graviton
satisfy the Klein-Gordon equation of a scalar field in the gravitational background |
|
namely ∂M (√−ggMN ∂N Φ) = 0. Parameterizing: |
|
Φ = φ(z)eip·x = e−kzψ(z)eip·x |
(7.9.38) |
where p is the (D − 1)-dimensional momentum the Klein-Gordon equation becomes the following Schrödinger-type equation,
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
p2ψ |
|
|
||
|
|
|
− |
|
ψ |
|
+ U ψ = − |
|
|
(7.9.39) |
|||||||
|
|
|
2 |
2 |
|
||||||||||||
where the potential, calculated in [60] is given by |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
= − |
2 |
: |
U |
= − |
|
(Δ + 1)k2 |
|
k |
δ(z) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
+ |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
2(Δ |
+ |
2)2H (z)2 + |
2 |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.9.40) |
|||
= −2 |
: |
U = |
k2 − |
1 |
kδ(z) |
|
|
||||||||||
8 |
|
2 |
|
|
Such an equation has a normalizable zero-mode wave function if the following condition is satisfied ≤ −2. Indeed it is evident from these expressions that for ≤ −2, U has a volcano shape as in Fig. 7.3 since the delta function has a negative coefficient, and the “bulk” term is non-negative for all z. Hence the trapping of
gravity occurs for positive tension (D − 2)-branes in the following window:
AdS ≤ ≤ −2 |
(7.9.41) |