- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •2.1 Introduction and a Short History of Black Holes
- •2.2 The Kruskal Extension of Schwarzschild Space-Time
- •2.2.1 Analysis of the Rindler Space-Time
- •2.2.2 Applying the Same Procedure to the Schwarzschild Metric
- •2.2.3 A First Analysis of Kruskal Space-Time
- •2.3 Basic Concepts about Future, Past and Causality
- •2.3.1 The Light-Cone
- •2.3.2 Future and Past of Events and Regions
- •Achronal Sets
- •Time-Orientability
- •Domains of Dependence
- •Cauchy surfaces
- •2.4.1 Conformal Mapping of Minkowski Space into the Einstein Static Universe
- •2.4.2 Asymptotic Flatness
- •2.5 The Causal Boundary of Kruskal Space-Time
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 The Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.2.1 Riemann and Ricci Curvatures of the Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.3 The Static Limit in Kerr-Newman Space-Time
- •Static Observers
- •3.4 The Horizon and the Ergosphere
- •The Horizon Area
- •3.5 Geodesics of the Kerr Metric
- •3.5.2 The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation and the Carter Constant
- •3.5.3 Reduction to First Order Equations
- •3.5.4 The Exact Solution of the Schwarzschild Orbit Equation as an Application
- •3.5.5 About Explicit Kerr Geodesics
- •3.6 The Kerr Black Hole and the Laws of Thermodynamics
- •3.6.1 The Penrose Mechanism
- •3.6.2 The Bekenstein Hawking Entropy and Hawking Radiation
- •References
- •4.1 Historical Introduction to Modern Cosmology
- •4.2 The Universe Is a Dynamical System
- •4.3 Expansion of the Universe
- •4.3.1 Why the Night is Dark and Olbers Paradox
- •4.3.2 Hubble, the Galaxies and the Great Debate
- •4.3.4 The Big Bang
- •4.4 The Cosmological Principle
- •4.5 The Cosmic Background Radiation
- •4.6 The New Scenario of the Inflationary Universe
- •4.7 The End of the Second Millennium and the Dawn of the Third Bring Great News in Cosmology
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Mathematical Interlude: Isometries and the Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.1 Isometries and Killing Vector Fields
- •5.2.2 Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3 The Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.1 Infinitesimal Transformations and Killing Vectors
- •5.2.3.2 Vielbeins, Connections and Metrics on G/H
- •5.2.3.3 Lie Derivatives
- •5.2.3.4 Invariant Metrics on Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.5 For Spheres and Pseudo-Spheres
- •5.3 Homogeneity Without Isotropy: What Might Happen
- •5.3.1 Bianchi Spaces and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.1.1 Bianchi Type I and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.2.1 A Ricci Flat Bianchi II Metric
- •5.3.3 Einstein Equation and Matter for This Billiard
- •5.3.4 The Same Billiard with Some Matter Content
- •5.3.5 Three-Space Geometry of This Toy Model
- •5.4 The Standard Cosmological Model: Isotropic and Homogeneous Metrics
- •5.4.1 Viewing the Coset Manifolds as Group Manifolds
- •5.5 Friedman Equations for the Scale Factor and the Equation of State
- •5.5.1 Proof of the Cosmological Red-Shift
- •5.5.2 Solution of the Cosmological Differential Equations for Dust and Radiation Without a Cosmological Constant
- •5.5.3 Embedding Cosmologies into de Sitter Space
- •5.6 General Consequences of Friedman Equations
- •5.6.1 Particle Horizon
- •5.6.2 Event Horizon
- •5.6.3 Red-Shift Distances
- •5.7 Conceptual Problems of the Standard Cosmological Model
- •5.8 Cosmic Evolution with a Scalar Field: The Basis for Inflation
- •5.8.1 de Sitter Solution
- •5.8.2 Slow-Rolling Approximate Solutions
- •5.8.2.1 Number of e-Folds
- •5.9 Primordial Perturbations of the Cosmological Metric and of the Inflaton
- •5.9.1 The Conformal Frame
- •5.9.2 Deriving the Equations for the Perturbation
- •5.9.2.1 Meaning of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.2.2 Evaluation of the Effective Mass Term in the Slow Roll Approximation
- •5.9.2.3 Derivation of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.3 Quantization of the Scalar Degree of Freedom
- •5.9.4 Calculation of the Power Spectrum in the Two Regimes
- •5.9.4.1 Short Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.2 Long Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.3 Gluing the Long and Short Wave-Length Solutions Together
- •5.9.4.4 The Spectral Index
- •5.10 The Anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background
- •5.10.1 The Sachs-Wolfe Effect
- •5.10.2 The Two-Point Temperature Correlation Function
- •5.10.3 Conclusive Remarks on CMB Anisotropies
- •References
- •6.1 Historical Outline and Introduction
- •6.1.1 Fermionic Strings and the Birth of Supersymmetry
- •6.1.2 Supersymmetry
- •6.1.3 Supergravity
- •6.2 Algebro-Geometric Structure of Supergravity
- •6.3 Free Differential Algebras
- •6.3.1 Chevalley Cohomology
- •Contraction and Lie Derivative
- •Definition of FDA
- •Classification of FDA and the Analogue of Levi Theorem: Minimal Versus Contractible Algebras
- •6.4 The Super FDA of M Theory and Its Cohomological Structure
- •6.4.1 The Minimal FDA of M-Theory and Cohomology
- •6.4.2 FDA Equivalence with Larger (Super) Lie Algebras
- •6.5 The Principle of Rheonomy
- •6.5.1 The Flow Chart for the Construction of a Supergravity Theory
- •6.6 Summary of Supergravities
- •Type IIA Super-Poicaré Algebra in the String Frame
- •The FDA Extension of the Type IIA Superalgebra in the String Frame
- •The Bianchi Identities
- •6.7.1 Rheonomic Parameterizations of the Type IIA Curvatures in the String Frame
- •Bosonic Curvatures
- •Fermionic Curvatures
- •6.7.2 Field Equations of Type IIA Supergravity in the String Frame
- •6.8 Type IIB Supergravity
- •SL(2, R) Lie Algebra
- •Coset Representative of SL(2, R)/O(2) in the Solvable Parameterization
- •The SU(1, 1)/U(1) Vielbein and Connection
- •6.8.2 The Free Differential Algebra, the Supergravity Fields and the Curvatures
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Complex Basis
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Real Basis
- •6.8.3 The Bosonic Field Equations and the Standard Form of the Bosonic Action
- •6.9 About Solutions
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction and Conceptual Outline
- •7.2 p-Branes as World Volume Gauge-Theories
- •7.4 The New First Order Formalism
- •7.4.1 An Alternative to the Polyakov Action for p-Branes
- •7.6 The D3-Brane: Summary
- •7.9 Domain Walls in Diverse Space-Time Dimensions
- •7.9.1 The Randall Sundrum Mechanism
- •7.9.2 The Conformal Gauge for Domain Walls
- •7.10 Conclusion on This Brane Bestiary
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Supergravity and Homogeneous Scalar Manifolds G/H
- •8.2.3 Scalar Manifolds of Maximal Supergravities in Diverse Dimensions
- •8.3 Duality Symmetries in Even Dimensions
- •8.3.1 The Kinetic Matrix N and Symplectic Embeddings
- •8.3.2 Symplectic Embeddings in General
- •8.5 Summary of Special Kähler Geometry
- •8.5.1 Hodge-Kähler Manifolds
- •8.5.2 Connection on the Line Bundle
- •8.5.3 Special Kähler Manifolds
- •8.6 Supergravities in Five Dimension and More Scalar Geometries
- •8.6.1 Very Special Geometry
- •8.6.3 Quaternionic Geometry
- •8.6.4 Quaternionic, Versus HyperKähler Manifolds
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Black Holes Once Again
- •9.2.2 The Oxidation Rules
- •Orbit of Solutions
- •The Schwarzschild Case
- •The Extremal Reissner Nordström Case
- •Curvature of the Extremal Spaces
- •9.2.4 Attractor Mechanism, the Entropy and Other Special Geometry Invariants
- •9.2.5 Critical Points of the Geodesic Potential and Attractors
- •At BPS Attractor Points
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type I
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type II
- •9.2.6.2 The Quartic Invariant
- •9.2.7.1 An Explicit Example of Exact Regular BPS Solution
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •9.2.9 Resuming the Discussion of Critical Points
- •Non-BPS Case
- •BPS Case
- •9.2.10 An Example of a Small Black Hole
- •The Metric
- •The Complex Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Charges
- •Structure of the Charges and Attractor Mechanism
- •9.2.11 Behavior of the Riemann Tensor in Regular Solutions
- •9.3.4 The SO(8) Spinor Bundle and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.5 The Well Adapted Basis of Gamma Matrices
- •9.3.6 The so(8)-Connection and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.7 The Holonomy Tensor and Superspace
- •9.3.8 Gauged Maurer Cartan 1-Forms of OSp(8|4)
- •9.3.9 Killing Spinors of the AdS4 Manifold
- •9.3.10 Supergauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.3.11 The 3-Form
- •9.4.1 Maurer Cartan Forms of OSp(6|4)
- •9.4.2 Explicit Construction of the P3 Geometry
- •9.4.3 The Compactification Ansatz
- •9.4.4 Killing Spinors on P3
- •9.4.5 Gauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.4.6 Gauge Completion of the B[2] Form
- •9.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 The Legacy of Volume 1
- •10.2 The Story Told in Volume 2
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Auxiliary Tools for p-Brane Actions
- •B.1 Notations and Conventions
- •Appendix C: Auxiliary Information About Some Superalgebras
- •C.1.1 The Superalgebra
- •C.2 The Relevant Supercosets and Their Relation
- •C.2.1 Finite Supergroup Elements
- •C.4 An so(6) Inversion Formula
- •Appendix D: MATHEMATICA Package NOVAMANIFOLDA
- •Coset Manifolds (Euclidian Signature)
- •Instructions for the Use
- •Description of the Main Commands of RUNCOSET
- •Structure Constants for CP2
- •Spheres
- •N010 Coset
- •RUNCOSET Package (Euclidian Signature)
- •Main
- •Spin Connection and Curvature Routines
- •Routine Curvapack
- •Routine Curvapackgen
- •Contorsion Routine for Mixed Vielbeins
- •Calculation of the Contorsion for General Manifolds
- •Calculation for Cartan Maurer Equations and Vielbein Differentials (Euclidian Signature)
- •Routine Thoft
- •AdS Space in Four Dimensions (Minkowski Signature)
- •Lie Algebra of SO(2, 3) and Killing Metric
- •Solvable Subalgebra Generating the Coset and Construction of the Vielbein
- •Killing Vectors
- •Trigonometric Coordinates
- •Test of Killing Vectors
- •MANIFOLDPROVA
- •The 4-Dimensional Coset CP2
- •Calculation of the (Pseudo-)Riemannian Geometry of a Kasner Metric in Vielbein Formalism
- •References
- •Index
Chapter 6
Supergravity: The Principles
Tiger, tiger, burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful (super) symmetry?
William Blake
6.1 Historical Outline and Introduction
The year 1968 was a crucial one for the political history of the world: the Prague Spring, which had started in January, was ruthlessly suppressed by soviet tanks in August, once for all destroying the dream of communism with a human face. The student revolt, that had started in American Universities as a protest against Vietnam war, migrated to Europe and from West Berlin diffused to all European capitals, culminating in the Paris upraising of May. The events of 1968 heavily marked the history of Western Countries since nothing after that year was the same as before. Also in Physics 1968 constitutes a hallmark since in those months a seed was planted from which a robust tree developed presently going under the name of Superstring Theory.
In 1968 Gabriele Veneziano (see Fig. 6.2) was 26 of age and was temporarily at the Theoretical Division of CERN, on leave of absence from the Weizman Institute, where he had obtained his Ph.D. just the year before. At that time the theory of strong interactions was still very vague: Quantum Chromodynamics had still to be invented and the minds of physicists were fascinated by the richness of the hadronic spectrum revealed by high energy experiments. The interpretation of all those particles as stable or unstable states created by the dynamics of quarks and gluons was not yet available. On the other hand, many scientists pursued the idea of describing the scattering amplitude of all hadrons by means of a universal formula such that in each reaction channel the dominant contribution should come from the sum over the intermediate states, provided by a unique infinite spectrum of particles of increasing mass.
The idea, as it usually happens with the fundamentals ones, is quite simple, at least in nuce. Two particles A and C collide and from the collision two new particles emerge B and D. We have to calculate the probability amplitude of such an event AABCD as a function of the momenta of the incoming and outgoing particles.
P.G. Frè, Gravity, a Geometrical Course, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5443-0_6, |
211 |
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 |
|
212 |
6 Supergravity: The Principles |
Fig. 6.1 A schematic view of Veneziano duality in hadron scattering
The process can be thought first as the fusion of A with C into an intermediate state, that successively decays into B and D. The probability of the process is essentially provided by a weighted sum over all possible intermediate states. Alternatively one could interpret the same process as the fusion of A with the antiparticle of B into an intermediate state that decays into D and the antiparticle of C. Also in this interpretation the probability is given by a weighted sum over all possible intermediate states. These two interpretations of the same process are respectively named the s and the t channel of the considered reaction (see Fig. 6.1).
The idea that fascinated the physicists of that time was the following one. Might it exist a scattering amplitude AABCD such the first and the second interpretation are simultaneously valid and the sum over the intermediate states in the s channel is exactly equal to the same sum in the t channel? Such a property was christened duality and preserves such a name to the present day.
The posed question was of a complete mathematical nature. If such a function AABCD existed, the next necessary step was to invent a theory capable of yielding it as scattering amplitude for the considered process.
In a paper sent to the Rivista del Nuovo Cimento in that dense 1968 year, Gabriele Veneziano singled out a function that realizes the desired duality in a mathematical exact way: it is the Euler beta-function introduced two hundred years before by the great swiss mathematician. The same Veneziano contributed a couple of years later, together with Sergio Fubini from Torino University and the MIT, to open the way for the identification of the physical system capable of producing dual scattering amplitudes. Just in a couple of years, by means of the contributions of many scientists throughout the world, Veneziano’s formula for the dual scattering amplitude of four particles was generalized to processes with an arbitrary number N of external legs: in 1970, in another fundamental paper published on Nuovo Cimento, Fubini and Veneziano organized the construction of such amplitudes within a new algorithm defined operatorial formalism which involved the use of an infinite number of harmonic oscillators with frequencies that are integer multiples of a fundamental one.
This infinite spectrum of harmonic oscillators induced an intuition in the brilliant mind of Yoichiro Nambu (see Fig. 6.2), the same Nippon-American physicist who in 1965 had proposed the color charge for the quarks. Nambu observed that anyone who is familiar with string musical instruments perfectly knows a very simple physical system endowed with the spectrum used by Fubini and Veneziano: the vibrating string. A very short and tiny string that besides traveling through space-time can also
6.1 Historical Outline and Introduction |
213 |
Fig. 6.2 The fathers of string theory. From the left Gabriele Veneziano, in the middle Sergio Fubini, on the right Yoichiro Nambu. Gabriele Veneziano was born in Florence, where he studied before transferring to the Weizman Institute in Israel, where he got his Ph.D. Later on, for many years he was permanent staff member of the Theoretical Division of CERN, which he left at retirement age to fill a highly prestigious position at the French Academy in Paris. Sergio Fubini was born in Torino, where he studied and became quite early full professor of Theoretical Physics. Appointed professor of Physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, he lived several years in Boston, until he left it to become permanent staff member of the Theoretical Division of CERN. After retirement he continued to live in Geneva where he died in 2005. Yoichiro Nambu, born in Japan, studied in the United States of America and up to the present day has been full professor of Physics at the University of Chicago. In 2008, professor Nambu was awarded the Nobel prize in Physics for his early contributions to the theory of symmetry breaking
Fig. 6.3 An idealized view of an open string that propagates through space-time, tracing a world-sheet with the topology of a strip
vibrate! This had to be the typical hadron! The infinite spectrum of hadronic states and resonances was thus explained with the infinite number of vibrational modes of the microscopic string. Once started, the string concert rapidly grew and developed. In a series of papers produced by several authors from all countries of the world, the physical system of the quantum-relativistic string was analyzed from all viewpoints. The string can be closed or open, namely its end points can coincide, or not. In the first case the string has the topology of a circle, in the second that of a segment. In both cases propagating through an ambient space-time the strings sweeps a worldsheet that in the closed case has the topology of a cylinder, in the second case that of a strip with boundary (see Figs. 6.3, 6.4). The interpretation of Veneziano ampli-
214 |
6 Supergravity: The Principles |
Fig. 6.4 An idealized view of a closed string that propagates through space-time, tracing a world-sheet with the topology of a tube
Fig. 6.5 The closed string interpretation of a scattering amplitude of seven particles
tudes as the result of the propagation of tiny strings that can join and split became standard and it is schematically illustrated in Fig. 6.5. In the quantization of the system two problems were met, whose solution led the theory very far in the direction of unexpected scenarios of incredible mathematical depth and unparalleled wealth of physical implications. The first problem related with the number of space-time dimensions. The usual four-dimensional space-time was too narrow for the strings to propagate freely without developing deadly anomalies capable of destroying the quantum consistency of the two-dimensional world-sheet theory. In quantum field theory anomalies are obstructions that forbid the extension to the quantum level of global or local symmetries present at the classical level. In the case of local symmetries, anomalies are deadly blows since the quantum theory acquires spurious degrees of freedom and becomes both meaningless and inconsistent. In the case of the strings the anomalous symmetry is the conformal one, namely the invariance