- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •2.1 Introduction and a Short History of Black Holes
- •2.2 The Kruskal Extension of Schwarzschild Space-Time
- •2.2.1 Analysis of the Rindler Space-Time
- •2.2.2 Applying the Same Procedure to the Schwarzschild Metric
- •2.2.3 A First Analysis of Kruskal Space-Time
- •2.3 Basic Concepts about Future, Past and Causality
- •2.3.1 The Light-Cone
- •2.3.2 Future and Past of Events and Regions
- •Achronal Sets
- •Time-Orientability
- •Domains of Dependence
- •Cauchy surfaces
- •2.4.1 Conformal Mapping of Minkowski Space into the Einstein Static Universe
- •2.4.2 Asymptotic Flatness
- •2.5 The Causal Boundary of Kruskal Space-Time
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 The Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.2.1 Riemann and Ricci Curvatures of the Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.3 The Static Limit in Kerr-Newman Space-Time
- •Static Observers
- •3.4 The Horizon and the Ergosphere
- •The Horizon Area
- •3.5 Geodesics of the Kerr Metric
- •3.5.2 The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation and the Carter Constant
- •3.5.3 Reduction to First Order Equations
- •3.5.4 The Exact Solution of the Schwarzschild Orbit Equation as an Application
- •3.5.5 About Explicit Kerr Geodesics
- •3.6 The Kerr Black Hole and the Laws of Thermodynamics
- •3.6.1 The Penrose Mechanism
- •3.6.2 The Bekenstein Hawking Entropy and Hawking Radiation
- •References
- •4.1 Historical Introduction to Modern Cosmology
- •4.2 The Universe Is a Dynamical System
- •4.3 Expansion of the Universe
- •4.3.1 Why the Night is Dark and Olbers Paradox
- •4.3.2 Hubble, the Galaxies and the Great Debate
- •4.3.4 The Big Bang
- •4.4 The Cosmological Principle
- •4.5 The Cosmic Background Radiation
- •4.6 The New Scenario of the Inflationary Universe
- •4.7 The End of the Second Millennium and the Dawn of the Third Bring Great News in Cosmology
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Mathematical Interlude: Isometries and the Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.1 Isometries and Killing Vector Fields
- •5.2.2 Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3 The Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.1 Infinitesimal Transformations and Killing Vectors
- •5.2.3.2 Vielbeins, Connections and Metrics on G/H
- •5.2.3.3 Lie Derivatives
- •5.2.3.4 Invariant Metrics on Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.5 For Spheres and Pseudo-Spheres
- •5.3 Homogeneity Without Isotropy: What Might Happen
- •5.3.1 Bianchi Spaces and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.1.1 Bianchi Type I and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.2.1 A Ricci Flat Bianchi II Metric
- •5.3.3 Einstein Equation and Matter for This Billiard
- •5.3.4 The Same Billiard with Some Matter Content
- •5.3.5 Three-Space Geometry of This Toy Model
- •5.4 The Standard Cosmological Model: Isotropic and Homogeneous Metrics
- •5.4.1 Viewing the Coset Manifolds as Group Manifolds
- •5.5 Friedman Equations for the Scale Factor and the Equation of State
- •5.5.1 Proof of the Cosmological Red-Shift
- •5.5.2 Solution of the Cosmological Differential Equations for Dust and Radiation Without a Cosmological Constant
- •5.5.3 Embedding Cosmologies into de Sitter Space
- •5.6 General Consequences of Friedman Equations
- •5.6.1 Particle Horizon
- •5.6.2 Event Horizon
- •5.6.3 Red-Shift Distances
- •5.7 Conceptual Problems of the Standard Cosmological Model
- •5.8 Cosmic Evolution with a Scalar Field: The Basis for Inflation
- •5.8.1 de Sitter Solution
- •5.8.2 Slow-Rolling Approximate Solutions
- •5.8.2.1 Number of e-Folds
- •5.9 Primordial Perturbations of the Cosmological Metric and of the Inflaton
- •5.9.1 The Conformal Frame
- •5.9.2 Deriving the Equations for the Perturbation
- •5.9.2.1 Meaning of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.2.2 Evaluation of the Effective Mass Term in the Slow Roll Approximation
- •5.9.2.3 Derivation of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.3 Quantization of the Scalar Degree of Freedom
- •5.9.4 Calculation of the Power Spectrum in the Two Regimes
- •5.9.4.1 Short Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.2 Long Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.3 Gluing the Long and Short Wave-Length Solutions Together
- •5.9.4.4 The Spectral Index
- •5.10 The Anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background
- •5.10.1 The Sachs-Wolfe Effect
- •5.10.2 The Two-Point Temperature Correlation Function
- •5.10.3 Conclusive Remarks on CMB Anisotropies
- •References
- •6.1 Historical Outline and Introduction
- •6.1.1 Fermionic Strings and the Birth of Supersymmetry
- •6.1.2 Supersymmetry
- •6.1.3 Supergravity
- •6.2 Algebro-Geometric Structure of Supergravity
- •6.3 Free Differential Algebras
- •6.3.1 Chevalley Cohomology
- •Contraction and Lie Derivative
- •Definition of FDA
- •Classification of FDA and the Analogue of Levi Theorem: Minimal Versus Contractible Algebras
- •6.4 The Super FDA of M Theory and Its Cohomological Structure
- •6.4.1 The Minimal FDA of M-Theory and Cohomology
- •6.4.2 FDA Equivalence with Larger (Super) Lie Algebras
- •6.5 The Principle of Rheonomy
- •6.5.1 The Flow Chart for the Construction of a Supergravity Theory
- •6.6 Summary of Supergravities
- •Type IIA Super-Poicaré Algebra in the String Frame
- •The FDA Extension of the Type IIA Superalgebra in the String Frame
- •The Bianchi Identities
- •6.7.1 Rheonomic Parameterizations of the Type IIA Curvatures in the String Frame
- •Bosonic Curvatures
- •Fermionic Curvatures
- •6.7.2 Field Equations of Type IIA Supergravity in the String Frame
- •6.8 Type IIB Supergravity
- •SL(2, R) Lie Algebra
- •Coset Representative of SL(2, R)/O(2) in the Solvable Parameterization
- •The SU(1, 1)/U(1) Vielbein and Connection
- •6.8.2 The Free Differential Algebra, the Supergravity Fields and the Curvatures
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Complex Basis
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Real Basis
- •6.8.3 The Bosonic Field Equations and the Standard Form of the Bosonic Action
- •6.9 About Solutions
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction and Conceptual Outline
- •7.2 p-Branes as World Volume Gauge-Theories
- •7.4 The New First Order Formalism
- •7.4.1 An Alternative to the Polyakov Action for p-Branes
- •7.6 The D3-Brane: Summary
- •7.9 Domain Walls in Diverse Space-Time Dimensions
- •7.9.1 The Randall Sundrum Mechanism
- •7.9.2 The Conformal Gauge for Domain Walls
- •7.10 Conclusion on This Brane Bestiary
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Supergravity and Homogeneous Scalar Manifolds G/H
- •8.2.3 Scalar Manifolds of Maximal Supergravities in Diverse Dimensions
- •8.3 Duality Symmetries in Even Dimensions
- •8.3.1 The Kinetic Matrix N and Symplectic Embeddings
- •8.3.2 Symplectic Embeddings in General
- •8.5 Summary of Special Kähler Geometry
- •8.5.1 Hodge-Kähler Manifolds
- •8.5.2 Connection on the Line Bundle
- •8.5.3 Special Kähler Manifolds
- •8.6 Supergravities in Five Dimension and More Scalar Geometries
- •8.6.1 Very Special Geometry
- •8.6.3 Quaternionic Geometry
- •8.6.4 Quaternionic, Versus HyperKähler Manifolds
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Black Holes Once Again
- •9.2.2 The Oxidation Rules
- •Orbit of Solutions
- •The Schwarzschild Case
- •The Extremal Reissner Nordström Case
- •Curvature of the Extremal Spaces
- •9.2.4 Attractor Mechanism, the Entropy and Other Special Geometry Invariants
- •9.2.5 Critical Points of the Geodesic Potential and Attractors
- •At BPS Attractor Points
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type I
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type II
- •9.2.6.2 The Quartic Invariant
- •9.2.7.1 An Explicit Example of Exact Regular BPS Solution
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •9.2.9 Resuming the Discussion of Critical Points
- •Non-BPS Case
- •BPS Case
- •9.2.10 An Example of a Small Black Hole
- •The Metric
- •The Complex Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Charges
- •Structure of the Charges and Attractor Mechanism
- •9.2.11 Behavior of the Riemann Tensor in Regular Solutions
- •9.3.4 The SO(8) Spinor Bundle and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.5 The Well Adapted Basis of Gamma Matrices
- •9.3.6 The so(8)-Connection and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.7 The Holonomy Tensor and Superspace
- •9.3.8 Gauged Maurer Cartan 1-Forms of OSp(8|4)
- •9.3.9 Killing Spinors of the AdS4 Manifold
- •9.3.10 Supergauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.3.11 The 3-Form
- •9.4.1 Maurer Cartan Forms of OSp(6|4)
- •9.4.2 Explicit Construction of the P3 Geometry
- •9.4.3 The Compactification Ansatz
- •9.4.4 Killing Spinors on P3
- •9.4.5 Gauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.4.6 Gauge Completion of the B[2] Form
- •9.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 The Legacy of Volume 1
- •10.2 The Story Told in Volume 2
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Auxiliary Tools for p-Brane Actions
- •B.1 Notations and Conventions
- •Appendix C: Auxiliary Information About Some Superalgebras
- •C.1.1 The Superalgebra
- •C.2 The Relevant Supercosets and Their Relation
- •C.2.1 Finite Supergroup Elements
- •C.4 An so(6) Inversion Formula
- •Appendix D: MATHEMATICA Package NOVAMANIFOLDA
- •Coset Manifolds (Euclidian Signature)
- •Instructions for the Use
- •Description of the Main Commands of RUNCOSET
- •Structure Constants for CP2
- •Spheres
- •N010 Coset
- •RUNCOSET Package (Euclidian Signature)
- •Main
- •Spin Connection and Curvature Routines
- •Routine Curvapack
- •Routine Curvapackgen
- •Contorsion Routine for Mixed Vielbeins
- •Calculation of the Contorsion for General Manifolds
- •Calculation for Cartan Maurer Equations and Vielbein Differentials (Euclidian Signature)
- •Routine Thoft
- •AdS Space in Four Dimensions (Minkowski Signature)
- •Lie Algebra of SO(2, 3) and Killing Metric
- •Solvable Subalgebra Generating the Coset and Construction of the Vielbein
- •Killing Vectors
- •Trigonometric Coordinates
- •Test of Killing Vectors
- •MANIFOLDPROVA
- •The 4-Dimensional Coset CP2
- •Calculation of the (Pseudo-)Riemannian Geometry of a Kasner Metric in Vielbein Formalism
- •References
- •Index
198 |
5 Cosmology and General Relativity |
5.9.4 Calculation of the Power Spectrum in the Two Regimes
Let us now consider the power spectrum for short and long wave-lengths respectively.
5.9.4.1 Short Wave-Lengths
According to our previous discussion in the short wave-length regime, which can be defined as
we just have |uκ (η)|2 |
1 |
|
κη & 1 |
|
|
|
(5.9.74) |
||||
so that we find: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
π κ3 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
PΦ (κ) |
κη |
& |
1 |
ϕ |
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 a |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
− |
m2 |
˙ |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
π |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P |
H |
(5.9.75) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The last line of the above equation follows from use of the exact result (5.9.8) and further transformation of the η-derivatives into t -derivatives.
5.9.4.2 Long Wave-Lengths
The method to obtain information on the wave-function and hence on the power spectrum for long wave-lengths:
κη ' 1 |
(5.9.76) |
relies on solving once again the propagation equation in the approximation κ2 → 0. This means that in (5.9.56) we forget the term in κ2 and we are left with the equation:
uk − |
θ |
|
θ uk = 0 |
(5.9.77) |
A basis of two independent solutions of the above ordinary differential equation of the second order is immediately found as follows:
u1 |
= θ |
(5.9.78) |
||
|
η dη |
|
||
u2 |
= θ η0 |
|
|
(5.9.79) |
θ 2 |
||||
Indeed one can easily verify that the Wronskian of these two solutions is: |
|
|||
u1u2 − u2u1 = 1 |
(5.9.80) |
5.9 Primordial Perturbations of the Cosmological Metric and of the Inflaton |
199 |
Correspondingly we can write the generic solution of (5.9.77) as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
uk(η) = c1θ + c2θ |
η dη |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
θ 2 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
η0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
= Akθ |
|
η dη |
|
(5.9.81) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
θ 2 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
η |
|
|
|
|||
Indeed the integral |
|
η0 |
dη |
is just some number so that the contribution from the |
||||||||
|
|
|
θ 2 |
|||||||||
|
η0 |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
first solution can |
always be reabsorbed into a redefinition of the initial point of inte- |
|||||||||||
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gration. The integration constant Ak has instead to be fixed by means of boundary conditions. Using the exact result (5.9.8) in the definition (5.9.27) of the function θ we can rewrite it as it follows:
1 1 |
1 |
H |
|
−1/2 |
||||
θ = |
√ |
|
|
|
− H 2 |
(5.9.82) |
||
|
||||||||
2π G |
a |
Using this expression and the definition of the conformal Hubble function H we get:
|
dη |
= 2π G |
dη a2 1 − |
H |
|
|
|||||
θ 2 |
H 2 |
|
|||||||||
|
|
= 2π G |
|
a2 |
a2 dη |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
− |
|
(5.9.83) |
|||||
|
|
H |
|
||||||||
Using this result and multiplying by θ = |
H |
|
|
|
ϕ |
||||||
|
and by the factor |
a necessary to con- |
|||||||||
aϕ |
vert a u-mode into a mode of the gravitational potential we obtain the following
long wave-length result: |
1 − a2 |
|
a2 dη |
|
|
|
|
||||
σk A k |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
H |
|
|
|
|
a |
|
|
|
= A k |
1 − a |
|
a dt |
= dt |
a dt |
(5.9.84) |
|||||
|
|
|
H |
|
|
|
d |
1 |
|
|
|
The last line follows from conversion of the η-derivatives into t -ones; furthermore we have reabsorbed the factor 2π G into the integration constant A k
Apart from the initial approximation consisting in neglecting the κ2 term for large wave-lengths the above result is exact. No approximation about cosmic evolution has been introduced so far. When the propagation of perturbations takes place in a slow-rolling universe we are in an approximately exponential phase where:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|||
a(t) exp[H t] |
|
a dt |
|
a(t) |
(5.9.85) |
|||||||
H |
||||||||||||
In this regime from (5.9.84) we obtain: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
slow-roll |
|
|
d 1 |
|
|
|
|
˙ |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
H |
|
||||||
σk |
A k |
|
|
|
= −A k H 2 |
(5.9.86) |
||||||
dt |
H |
200 |
5 Cosmology and General Relativity |
On the other hand if we consider the same Fourier component σk during the postinflationary radiation-dominated era we are in an approximately square root phase where:
a(t) m√t |
|
|
|
a dt |
3 mt 2 |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
dt |
a |
a dt |
= |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.9.87) |
||||
|
d |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and we get: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
radiation era 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
σk |
|
|
|
|
|
A k |
|
(5.9.88) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
We conclude that, as observed, in the post-inflationary age, the power spectrum of the gravitational potential has the following form:
|
|
|
m2 |
for κ η |
| & |
1 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
P |
|
||||||||
PΦ (κ) |
|
|
|
|
H |
κ > aH |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
= |
|
π ˙ |
| |
|
(5.9.89) |
|||||||
|
|
94 | |
A |
k|2κ3 |
for κ|η| ' |
1 |
|
κ < aH |
The last column yielding the separating condition between the short and long wave-length regimes, follows from the approximate behavior of the scale factor in the almost exponential phase of inflation. There, in conformal time, we have: a −1/(H η) and therefore η (aH )−1. The physical interpretation of (5.9.89) is quite clear. At every cosmic time t ,
λκ (t) ≡ |
a(t) |
(5.9.90) |
κ |
is the effective wave-length of the Fourier mode κ, which is constantly stretched by the expansion of the Universe. Short wave-lengths are those that are shorter than the Hubble radius at the same time:
λκ (t) < H (t)−1 |
(5.9.91) |
Long wave lengths are those larger than the Hubble radius. In an exponential phase of expansion the Hubble radius is also the event horizon (see (5.6.38)) which remains approximately constant while the scale factor and hence all the wave-lengths rapidly grow. Hence if the exponential phase lasts long enough the wave-lengths of almost all modes κ exit the Hubble radius and becomes frozen. Indeed no physical process can influence a mode whose characteristic scale is larger than the event horizon.
Quite different is the evolution of wave-lengths in radiation and matter dominated universes. In both these cases the Hubble radius grows linearly in time:
H (t)−1 t |
(5.9.92) |
while the wave-lengths grow either the Hubble radius (particle horizon
1 |
2 |
. Hence no mode which is inside |
as t 2 |
or as t 3 |
in these cases) at some time t will exit it in the
5.9 Primordial Perturbations of the Cosmological Metric and of the Inflaton |
201 |
future. On the contrary modes which were out of the Hubble horizon at the end of inflation can reenter it in the subsequent radiation dominated or matter dominated era.
5.9.4.3 Gluing the Long and Short Wave-Length Solutions Together
In view of these considerations the formula (5.9.89) for the power spectrum is quite exhaustive provided we can fix the integration constant A k which encodes all the information. This step can be achieved by equating the long and short wave-length form of the mode σk at the transition time κ|η| = 1, namely by setting:
|
ϕ ( |
− |
1)3/4e±i(ηκ− iπ2ν ) |
|
|
|
|
H |
| |
| = |
|
|
|||||||||
|
a |
κ√π κ |
−A k H 2 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
˙ |
|
at κ η |
|
1 |
(5.9.93) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
From (5.9.93) we obtain: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iψ mP2 |
|
H 2 |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
A k = e |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
κ3√ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.9.94) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ϕ |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
π |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
˙ |
|
|
|
|
where we used the exact result (5.8.23) and where eiψ is an η dependent phase factor whose explicit form is irrelevant since we are interested in the square modulus of A k.
In this way the long wave-length form of the power spectrum becomes:
|
4 m2 |
H 4 |
|
|
|||
PΦ (κ) = − |
|
|
P |
|
|
|
(5.9.95) |
9 |
π |
H |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
˙ |
|
κ=aH |
The value of the above expression resides in the following. In the post inflationary age we can use (5.9.95) for all those modes whose wave-length was inside the Hubble radius at the beginning of inflation but exited it before the end of inflation. This condition gives the range:
(H a)f > κ > (H a)i |
(5.9.96) |
where the suffix i/f means that we have to evaluate the specified quantity at the beginning and at the end of inflation, respectively. If inflation lasts long enough and produces 60 or 70 e-foldings the range described in (5.9.96) goes over as many order of magnitudes and encompasses the whole observable universe.
The power spectrum is observed today but the Hubble function and its derivative appearing in it refer to the inflation-age, when they were almost constant.
5.9.4.4 The Spectral Index
It is customary to characterize the behavior of the power spectrum by means of a so called spectral index, defined as follows:
|
d ln PΦ (κ) |
1 |
|
d |
|
||
nS = 1 + |
|
= 1 + |
|
κ |
|
PΦ |
(5.9.97) |
d ln κ |
PΦ |
dκ |
202 |
5 Cosmology and General Relativity |
Imagine that the power spectrum has a power-like behavior:
PΦ (κ) κα |
(5.9.98) |
then the spectral index would just be:
nS = 1 + α |
(5.9.99) |
In case of scale invariant spectra, namely PΦ (λκ) = PΦ (κ), the spectral index is exactly nS = 1. It is very interesting that, by implementing the slow-roll approximation, the spectral index can be calculated and related to the slow-roll parameters of the potential. To this effect let us observe that, by definition, we have d ln κ = d ln(aH ). On the other hand in the slow roll approximation d ln(aH ) d ln a and we have:
d ln a |
= |
d ln a dt |
= |
H |
− |
3H 2 |
|
2W |
(5.9.100) |
||
dφ |
dt dφ |
φ |
W |
− W |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
˙ |
|
|
|
|
|
In the above equations φ and sionless potential, introduced tions:
W are the dimensionless scalar field and the dimenin (5.8.19) and we have used the two slow-roll equa-
H |
|
|
3 |
|
; |
˙ |
− |
3H |
|
|
2 |
|
2 |
W (φ) |
|
φ |
|
W |
(5.9.101) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using these tools we can rewrite:
d ln PΦ (κ) |
= − |
W (φ) d |
(5.9.102) |
|||
|
|
|
|
PΦ (κ) |
||
d ln κ |
2W |
dφ |
Substituting in (5.9.102) the expression (5.9.95) of the power-spectrum and using once again the slow-roll approximation (5.9.101) we finally obtain:
|
d ln κ |
= − |
2 |
3 W |
− 2 |
W |
(5.9.103) |
|
|
d ln PΦ (κ) |
|
1 |
W |
2 |
|
W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
This result immediately yields: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nS = 1 + 6ηW − 9εW |
|
|
(5.9.104) |
||||
where we used the slow-roll parameters of the |
potential defined |
in (5.8.27) |
||||||
and (5.8.30). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thus the shape of the primeval inflationary potential defines the behavior of the power spectrum occurring in the two-point function of the quantized scalar field. The power spectrum, on its turn, is an experimentally accessible datum since it is directly related to the anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background. How this can happen is outlined in the next section.