- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •2.1 Introduction and a Short History of Black Holes
- •2.2 The Kruskal Extension of Schwarzschild Space-Time
- •2.2.1 Analysis of the Rindler Space-Time
- •2.2.2 Applying the Same Procedure to the Schwarzschild Metric
- •2.2.3 A First Analysis of Kruskal Space-Time
- •2.3 Basic Concepts about Future, Past and Causality
- •2.3.1 The Light-Cone
- •2.3.2 Future and Past of Events and Regions
- •Achronal Sets
- •Time-Orientability
- •Domains of Dependence
- •Cauchy surfaces
- •2.4.1 Conformal Mapping of Minkowski Space into the Einstein Static Universe
- •2.4.2 Asymptotic Flatness
- •2.5 The Causal Boundary of Kruskal Space-Time
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 The Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.2.1 Riemann and Ricci Curvatures of the Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.3 The Static Limit in Kerr-Newman Space-Time
- •Static Observers
- •3.4 The Horizon and the Ergosphere
- •The Horizon Area
- •3.5 Geodesics of the Kerr Metric
- •3.5.2 The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation and the Carter Constant
- •3.5.3 Reduction to First Order Equations
- •3.5.4 The Exact Solution of the Schwarzschild Orbit Equation as an Application
- •3.5.5 About Explicit Kerr Geodesics
- •3.6 The Kerr Black Hole and the Laws of Thermodynamics
- •3.6.1 The Penrose Mechanism
- •3.6.2 The Bekenstein Hawking Entropy and Hawking Radiation
- •References
- •4.1 Historical Introduction to Modern Cosmology
- •4.2 The Universe Is a Dynamical System
- •4.3 Expansion of the Universe
- •4.3.1 Why the Night is Dark and Olbers Paradox
- •4.3.2 Hubble, the Galaxies and the Great Debate
- •4.3.4 The Big Bang
- •4.4 The Cosmological Principle
- •4.5 The Cosmic Background Radiation
- •4.6 The New Scenario of the Inflationary Universe
- •4.7 The End of the Second Millennium and the Dawn of the Third Bring Great News in Cosmology
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Mathematical Interlude: Isometries and the Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.1 Isometries and Killing Vector Fields
- •5.2.2 Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3 The Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.1 Infinitesimal Transformations and Killing Vectors
- •5.2.3.2 Vielbeins, Connections and Metrics on G/H
- •5.2.3.3 Lie Derivatives
- •5.2.3.4 Invariant Metrics on Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.5 For Spheres and Pseudo-Spheres
- •5.3 Homogeneity Without Isotropy: What Might Happen
- •5.3.1 Bianchi Spaces and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.1.1 Bianchi Type I and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.2.1 A Ricci Flat Bianchi II Metric
- •5.3.3 Einstein Equation and Matter for This Billiard
- •5.3.4 The Same Billiard with Some Matter Content
- •5.3.5 Three-Space Geometry of This Toy Model
- •5.4 The Standard Cosmological Model: Isotropic and Homogeneous Metrics
- •5.4.1 Viewing the Coset Manifolds as Group Manifolds
- •5.5 Friedman Equations for the Scale Factor and the Equation of State
- •5.5.1 Proof of the Cosmological Red-Shift
- •5.5.2 Solution of the Cosmological Differential Equations for Dust and Radiation Without a Cosmological Constant
- •5.5.3 Embedding Cosmologies into de Sitter Space
- •5.6 General Consequences of Friedman Equations
- •5.6.1 Particle Horizon
- •5.6.2 Event Horizon
- •5.6.3 Red-Shift Distances
- •5.7 Conceptual Problems of the Standard Cosmological Model
- •5.8 Cosmic Evolution with a Scalar Field: The Basis for Inflation
- •5.8.1 de Sitter Solution
- •5.8.2 Slow-Rolling Approximate Solutions
- •5.8.2.1 Number of e-Folds
- •5.9 Primordial Perturbations of the Cosmological Metric and of the Inflaton
- •5.9.1 The Conformal Frame
- •5.9.2 Deriving the Equations for the Perturbation
- •5.9.2.1 Meaning of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.2.2 Evaluation of the Effective Mass Term in the Slow Roll Approximation
- •5.9.2.3 Derivation of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.3 Quantization of the Scalar Degree of Freedom
- •5.9.4 Calculation of the Power Spectrum in the Two Regimes
- •5.9.4.1 Short Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.2 Long Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.3 Gluing the Long and Short Wave-Length Solutions Together
- •5.9.4.4 The Spectral Index
- •5.10 The Anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background
- •5.10.1 The Sachs-Wolfe Effect
- •5.10.2 The Two-Point Temperature Correlation Function
- •5.10.3 Conclusive Remarks on CMB Anisotropies
- •References
- •6.1 Historical Outline and Introduction
- •6.1.1 Fermionic Strings and the Birth of Supersymmetry
- •6.1.2 Supersymmetry
- •6.1.3 Supergravity
- •6.2 Algebro-Geometric Structure of Supergravity
- •6.3 Free Differential Algebras
- •6.3.1 Chevalley Cohomology
- •Contraction and Lie Derivative
- •Definition of FDA
- •Classification of FDA and the Analogue of Levi Theorem: Minimal Versus Contractible Algebras
- •6.4 The Super FDA of M Theory and Its Cohomological Structure
- •6.4.1 The Minimal FDA of M-Theory and Cohomology
- •6.4.2 FDA Equivalence with Larger (Super) Lie Algebras
- •6.5 The Principle of Rheonomy
- •6.5.1 The Flow Chart for the Construction of a Supergravity Theory
- •6.6 Summary of Supergravities
- •Type IIA Super-Poicaré Algebra in the String Frame
- •The FDA Extension of the Type IIA Superalgebra in the String Frame
- •The Bianchi Identities
- •6.7.1 Rheonomic Parameterizations of the Type IIA Curvatures in the String Frame
- •Bosonic Curvatures
- •Fermionic Curvatures
- •6.7.2 Field Equations of Type IIA Supergravity in the String Frame
- •6.8 Type IIB Supergravity
- •SL(2, R) Lie Algebra
- •Coset Representative of SL(2, R)/O(2) in the Solvable Parameterization
- •The SU(1, 1)/U(1) Vielbein and Connection
- •6.8.2 The Free Differential Algebra, the Supergravity Fields and the Curvatures
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Complex Basis
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Real Basis
- •6.8.3 The Bosonic Field Equations and the Standard Form of the Bosonic Action
- •6.9 About Solutions
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction and Conceptual Outline
- •7.2 p-Branes as World Volume Gauge-Theories
- •7.4 The New First Order Formalism
- •7.4.1 An Alternative to the Polyakov Action for p-Branes
- •7.6 The D3-Brane: Summary
- •7.9 Domain Walls in Diverse Space-Time Dimensions
- •7.9.1 The Randall Sundrum Mechanism
- •7.9.2 The Conformal Gauge for Domain Walls
- •7.10 Conclusion on This Brane Bestiary
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Supergravity and Homogeneous Scalar Manifolds G/H
- •8.2.3 Scalar Manifolds of Maximal Supergravities in Diverse Dimensions
- •8.3 Duality Symmetries in Even Dimensions
- •8.3.1 The Kinetic Matrix N and Symplectic Embeddings
- •8.3.2 Symplectic Embeddings in General
- •8.5 Summary of Special Kähler Geometry
- •8.5.1 Hodge-Kähler Manifolds
- •8.5.2 Connection on the Line Bundle
- •8.5.3 Special Kähler Manifolds
- •8.6 Supergravities in Five Dimension and More Scalar Geometries
- •8.6.1 Very Special Geometry
- •8.6.3 Quaternionic Geometry
- •8.6.4 Quaternionic, Versus HyperKähler Manifolds
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Black Holes Once Again
- •9.2.2 The Oxidation Rules
- •Orbit of Solutions
- •The Schwarzschild Case
- •The Extremal Reissner Nordström Case
- •Curvature of the Extremal Spaces
- •9.2.4 Attractor Mechanism, the Entropy and Other Special Geometry Invariants
- •9.2.5 Critical Points of the Geodesic Potential and Attractors
- •At BPS Attractor Points
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type I
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type II
- •9.2.6.2 The Quartic Invariant
- •9.2.7.1 An Explicit Example of Exact Regular BPS Solution
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •9.2.9 Resuming the Discussion of Critical Points
- •Non-BPS Case
- •BPS Case
- •9.2.10 An Example of a Small Black Hole
- •The Metric
- •The Complex Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Charges
- •Structure of the Charges and Attractor Mechanism
- •9.2.11 Behavior of the Riemann Tensor in Regular Solutions
- •9.3.4 The SO(8) Spinor Bundle and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.5 The Well Adapted Basis of Gamma Matrices
- •9.3.6 The so(8)-Connection and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.7 The Holonomy Tensor and Superspace
- •9.3.8 Gauged Maurer Cartan 1-Forms of OSp(8|4)
- •9.3.9 Killing Spinors of the AdS4 Manifold
- •9.3.10 Supergauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.3.11 The 3-Form
- •9.4.1 Maurer Cartan Forms of OSp(6|4)
- •9.4.2 Explicit Construction of the P3 Geometry
- •9.4.3 The Compactification Ansatz
- •9.4.4 Killing Spinors on P3
- •9.4.5 Gauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.4.6 Gauge Completion of the B[2] Form
- •9.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 The Legacy of Volume 1
- •10.2 The Story Told in Volume 2
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Auxiliary Tools for p-Brane Actions
- •B.1 Notations and Conventions
- •Appendix C: Auxiliary Information About Some Superalgebras
- •C.1.1 The Superalgebra
- •C.2 The Relevant Supercosets and Their Relation
- •C.2.1 Finite Supergroup Elements
- •C.4 An so(6) Inversion Formula
- •Appendix D: MATHEMATICA Package NOVAMANIFOLDA
- •Coset Manifolds (Euclidian Signature)
- •Instructions for the Use
- •Description of the Main Commands of RUNCOSET
- •Structure Constants for CP2
- •Spheres
- •N010 Coset
- •RUNCOSET Package (Euclidian Signature)
- •Main
- •Spin Connection and Curvature Routines
- •Routine Curvapack
- •Routine Curvapackgen
- •Contorsion Routine for Mixed Vielbeins
- •Calculation of the Contorsion for General Manifolds
- •Calculation for Cartan Maurer Equations and Vielbein Differentials (Euclidian Signature)
- •Routine Thoft
- •AdS Space in Four Dimensions (Minkowski Signature)
- •Lie Algebra of SO(2, 3) and Killing Metric
- •Solvable Subalgebra Generating the Coset and Construction of the Vielbein
- •Killing Vectors
- •Trigonometric Coordinates
- •Test of Killing Vectors
- •MANIFOLDPROVA
- •The 4-Dimensional Coset CP2
- •Calculation of the (Pseudo-)Riemannian Geometry of a Kasner Metric in Vielbein Formalism
- •References
- •Index
132 |
|
|
|
5 Cosmology and General Relativity |
|||
−→3 |
= − √ω cos θ |
∂r |
+ √ωr sin θ |
∂θ + |
|
|
r sin θ ∂z |
2 |
|||||||
|
2 |
∂ |
2 |
∂ |
√ω |
∂ |
k
and because of (5.3.26) they are Killing vectors of the 4-dimensional metric (5.3.20). These three are not the only Killing vectors. There is a fourth one generating O(2) rotations, namely:
−→O = ∂θ |
(5.3.28) |
∂ |
|
k
−→
The Lie derivatives of the 1-forms Ωi are not all zero along kO , since we have:
|
O |
|
= ; |
|
O |
|
= − ; |
|
O |
|
= |
|
|
−→ |
Ω1 |
0 |
−→ |
Ω2 |
Ω3 |
−→ |
Ω3 |
|
Ω2 |
(5.3.29) |
|||
k |
|
k |
|
k |
|
|
which means that under O(2) the three Ωi arrange into a singlet and into a doublet.
−→
Yet kO is a Killing vector for (5.3.20), since this metric is written in terms of O(2) invariants.
An alternative way of writing the metric (5.3.20) uses Cartesian coordinates, through the standard change of variables:
x = r cos θ ; |
y = r sin θ |
(5.3.30) |
In these coordinates (5.3.20) reads:
ds(d2 |
|
|
A(t) dt2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
Δ(t) dz |
|
ω |
|
|
y dx) |
2 |
|
= − |
+ |
|
+ |
dy |
+ |
+ |
(x dy |
− |
(5.3.31) |
|||||||
|
4 |
||||||||||||||||
4) |
|
|
Λ(t) dx |
|
|
|
|
and the four killing vectors take the very simple form:
−→1 |
= ∂z |
|
|
|
||
k |
|
∂ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
−→2 |
= ∂x − |
4 |
|
∂z |
||
|
|
∂ |
ω |
|
∂ |
|
k |
|
|
|
y |
(5.3.32) |
|
−→3 |
= ∂y + |
4 |
|
|||
|
∂z |
|||||
|
|
∂ |
ω |
|
∂ |
|
k |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
−→O |
= −x ∂y |
+ |
|
∂x |
||
|
|
|
∂ |
|
|
∂ |
k |
|
|
|
|
y |
which will be very useful in our subsequent discussion of geodesics.
5.3.3 Einstein Equation and Matter for This Billiard
Let us now study under which conditions the metric (5.3.20) is a solution of Einstein field equations. To this effect we use the vielbein formalism and we write the
5.3 Homogeneity Without Isotropy: What Might Happen |
133 |
||||||||
vierbein as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
E0 = |
|
dt; |
E1 = |
|
|
E2,3 = |
|
|
|
A(t) |
Δ(t)Ω1; |
Λ(t)Ω2,3 |
(5.3.33) |
We can immediately calculate the spin connection from the vanishing torsion equation:
|
|
dEA + ωAB EC ηBC = 0 |
|
|
|
|
(5.3.34) |
|||||||||||||||||
where for the flat metric we have used the mostly plus convention: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
ηab = diag{−, +, +, +} |
|
|
|
|
(5.3.35) |
||||||||||||||||
We obtain the following result for the spin connection |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
01 |
|
|
|
˙ |
|
1 |
|
|
02 |
|
|
Λ |
|
|
|
2 |
|
||||||
ω |
= |
2√ |
|
; |
|
= |
2√ |
˙ |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
E |
ω |
|
|
|
|
|
|
E |
|
|
||||||||||
|
AΔ |
|
AΛ |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Λ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
˙ |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
03 |
|
|
|
˙ |
|
3 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
(5.3.36) |
||||
ω |
|
= 2√ |
|
|
E |
; |
ω |
|
= −ω 4Λ E |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
AΛ |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
13 |
= ω |
˙ |
2 |
; |
|
|
23 |
= ω |
˙ |
1 |
|
|
|
||||||||||
ω |
|
4Λ |
E |
|
|
ω |
|
4Λ |
E |
|
|
|
|
|
which can be used to calculate the curvature 2-form and the Ricci tensor from the standard formulae:
RAB ≡ dωAB + ωAC ωDB ηCD = RAB CD eC eD
(5.3.37)
RicF G = ηF ARAB GB
The Ricci tensor turns out to be diagonal and has the following eigenvalues:
Ric00 |
= |
|
A (t)Δ (t) |
+ |
|
|
(t)2 |
+ |
|
A (t)Λ (t) |
+ |
Λ (t)2 |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
8A(t)2Δ(t) |
|
8A(t)Δ(t)2 |
|
4A(t)2Λ(t) |
4A(t)Λ(t)2 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
− |
(t) |
|
|
− |
Λ (t) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
4A(t)Δ(t) |
2A(t)Λ(t) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
ω2Δ(t) |
|
A (t)Δ (t) |
|
|
|
|
(t)2 |
|
(t)Λ (t) |
+ |
||||||||||||
Ric11 |
= |
|
|
− |
|
|
− |
|
|
+ |
|
|
|||||||||||||
16Λ(t)2 |
8A(t)2Δ(t) |
8A(t)Δ(t)2 |
4A(t)Δ(t)Λ(t) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ric22 |
= Ric33 |
|
|
|
|
A (t)Λ (t) |
|
|
|
|
|
(t)Λ (t) |
|
Λ (t) |
|
|
|||||||||
Ric |
|
|
−(ω2Δ(t)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
= |
16Λ(t)2 |
|
− |
8A(t)2Λ(t) |
+ |
8A(t)Δ(t)Λ(t) |
+ 4A(t)Λ(t) |
||||||||||||||||||
33 |
|
|
With little more effort we can calculate the Einstein tensor defined by:
GAB = RicAB − 12 ηAB R
R = ηF GRicF G
(t)
4A(t)Δ(t)
(5.3.38)
(5.3.39)
134 |
5 Cosmology and General Relativity |
and we obtain a diagonal tensor with the following eigenvalues:
−(ω2Δ(t)) G00 = 32Λ(t)2
3ω2Δ(t) G11 = 32Λ(t)2 +
G22 = G33
−(ω2Δ(t)) G33 = 32Λ(t)2
|
|
(t)Λ (t) |
|
Λ (t)2 |
|
|
|
|
|||||
+ |
|
|
|
|
+ 8A(t)Λ(t)2 |
||||||||
4A(t)Δ(t)Λ(t) |
|||||||||||||
|
A (t)Λ (t) |
|
|
Λ (t)2 |
|
Λ (t) |
|||||||
|
|
+ |
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|||||
4A(t)2Λ(t) |
8A(t)Λ(t)2 |
2A(t)Λ(t) |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.3.40) |
||
|
|
A (t)Δ (t) |
+ |
|
(t)2 |
|
|
A (t)Λ (t) |
|||||
+ |
|
|
+ |
|
|
|
|||||||
8A(t)2Δ(t) |
8A(t)Δ(t)2 |
|
8A(t)2Λ(t) |
|
|
(t)Λ (t) |
+ |
Λ (t)2 |
(t) |
− |
Λ (t) |
|
− |
|
|
− |
|
|
||
8A(t)Δ(t)Λ(t) |
8A(t)Λ(t)2 |
4A(t)Δ(t) |
4A(t)Λ(t) |
It is a remarkable fact that we can obtain an exact solution of the evolution equations in the absence of any matter content. What we get is an empty Ricci flat Universe with rather peculiar properties. Imposing that the Ricci tensor (5.3.38) vanishes (and hence also the Einstein tensor (5.3.40) does) we get differential equations for Λ(t), Δ(t) and A(t) that are exactly solved by the following choice of transcendental functions:
A(t) = exp[tω] cosh t2 |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
ω |
|
|
|
|
|
tω |
|
|
|
|
ω |
|
|
|
Λ(t) = exp |
|
cosh |
t |
|
(5.3.41) |
||||
2 |
2 |
||||||||
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Δ(t) = |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
cosh[ t2ω ] |
|
|
|
In order to write the metric in a standard cosmological form we need to redefine the time variable by setting:
dτ = A(t) dt (5.3.42)
so that in the new cosmic time (5.3.20) becomes:
ds(d2 |
4) = dτ 2 + Λ(τ ) Ω22 + Ω32 + Δ(τ )Ω12 |
(5.3.43) |
Equation (5.3.42) can be exactly integrated in terms of hypergeometric functions. We obtain:
τ (t) |
|
3ω2 exp |
4 |
|
1 |
exp τ ω |
|
|
2 2F1 |
|
4 |
, |
2 |
, |
4 |
, |
|
exp tω |
(5.3.44) |
||||||
|
|
2√ |
tω |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
= |
|
+ |
[ |
] + |
|
|
|
|
|
− |
[ ] |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although inverting (5.3.44) is not analytically possible, yet it suffices to plot the behavior of the scale factors Λ and as functions of the cosmic time τ . This behavior
5.3 Homogeneity Without Isotropy: What Might Happen |
135 |
Fig. 5.5 Evolution of the cosmological scale factors
Λ(t) (thick line) and Δ(t)
(thin line) for very early times, when the Universe is very young. Λ starts at a finite value 0.5 and always grows, while starts at zero, grows for some time up to the maximum value 1 and then starts decreasing
Fig. 5.6 Evolution of the cosmological scale factor Δ(t) for late times, when the Universe grows old. tends exponentially to zero
is shown in several graphics. In Fig. 5.5 we see the behavior of the scale factors for very early times.
The early finite behavior of the scale factors has a very important consequence. This space-time has no initial singularity. Indeed for τ → 0 the curvature 2-form is perfectly well behaved and tends to the following finite limit:
R01 = − |
1 |
E2 E3; R02 = − |
1 |
E1 E3; R03 = |
1 |
E1 E2 |
|
2 |
4 |
|
4 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
(5.3.45) |
||
R12 = 0; |
|
R13 = 0; |
|
R23 = |
1 |
E0 E1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|||||
In Fig. 5.6 we see the evolution of the |
|
scale factor for late times just after reaching |
its maximum. As we see it rapidly and exponentially tends to zero.
136 |
5 Cosmology and General Relativity |
Fig. 5.7 Evolution of the cosmological scale factor Λ(t) for very late times. By now is essentially zero but Λ continues to grow and indefinitely in time with a power law. The graphic plots the logarithm of the scale factor against the logarithm of time and we see an almost perfect straight line
In Fig. 5.7 we see instead the very late time behavior of the scale factor Λ. At asymptotically late times this scale factor grows as a power of time which is slightly smaller than one.
We can summarize by saying that this funny homogeneous but not isotropic Universe, which is empty of matter, has a curious history. It has no initial singularity but it is born finite, small and essentially two-dimensional. It begins to expand and the third dimension starts to develop. It reaches a state when it is effectively threedimensional, although still very small, the two scale factors being of equal size. Then the third dimension rapidly squeezes and the Universe becomes again effectively two dimensional growing monotonously large in the two dimensions in which it was born.
This is an example of the billiard mechanism. The effective dimensions of spacetime change more than once in the course of the cosmic evolution. This is further illustrated in Fig. 5.8 where we show the motion of the fictitious cosmic ball whose coordinates are:
h1(t) = h2(t) = |
1 |
log Λ(t), |
h3(t) = |
1 |
log Δ(t) |
(5.3.46) |
|
2 |
|
2 |
It is evident from the figure that we have two Kasner epochs joined by a smooth bounce. For very early times t → −∞ and for ω > 0 we have
hi (t) ≈ pi t : {p1, p2, p3} = 0, 0, |
2 |
|
|
(5.3.47) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
ω |
|
|
|
while for very late times t → ∞ and for ω > 0 we find |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
hi (t) ≈ pi t : {p1, p2, p3} = |
2 |
, |
2 |
, − |
2 |
(5.3.48) |
||
|
ω |
|
ω |
|
|
ω |
|
|