- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •2.1 Introduction and a Short History of Black Holes
- •2.2 The Kruskal Extension of Schwarzschild Space-Time
- •2.2.1 Analysis of the Rindler Space-Time
- •2.2.2 Applying the Same Procedure to the Schwarzschild Metric
- •2.2.3 A First Analysis of Kruskal Space-Time
- •2.3 Basic Concepts about Future, Past and Causality
- •2.3.1 The Light-Cone
- •2.3.2 Future and Past of Events and Regions
- •Achronal Sets
- •Time-Orientability
- •Domains of Dependence
- •Cauchy surfaces
- •2.4.1 Conformal Mapping of Minkowski Space into the Einstein Static Universe
- •2.4.2 Asymptotic Flatness
- •2.5 The Causal Boundary of Kruskal Space-Time
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 The Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.2.1 Riemann and Ricci Curvatures of the Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.3 The Static Limit in Kerr-Newman Space-Time
- •Static Observers
- •3.4 The Horizon and the Ergosphere
- •The Horizon Area
- •3.5 Geodesics of the Kerr Metric
- •3.5.2 The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation and the Carter Constant
- •3.5.3 Reduction to First Order Equations
- •3.5.4 The Exact Solution of the Schwarzschild Orbit Equation as an Application
- •3.5.5 About Explicit Kerr Geodesics
- •3.6 The Kerr Black Hole and the Laws of Thermodynamics
- •3.6.1 The Penrose Mechanism
- •3.6.2 The Bekenstein Hawking Entropy and Hawking Radiation
- •References
- •4.1 Historical Introduction to Modern Cosmology
- •4.2 The Universe Is a Dynamical System
- •4.3 Expansion of the Universe
- •4.3.1 Why the Night is Dark and Olbers Paradox
- •4.3.2 Hubble, the Galaxies and the Great Debate
- •4.3.4 The Big Bang
- •4.4 The Cosmological Principle
- •4.5 The Cosmic Background Radiation
- •4.6 The New Scenario of the Inflationary Universe
- •4.7 The End of the Second Millennium and the Dawn of the Third Bring Great News in Cosmology
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Mathematical Interlude: Isometries and the Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.1 Isometries and Killing Vector Fields
- •5.2.2 Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3 The Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.1 Infinitesimal Transformations and Killing Vectors
- •5.2.3.2 Vielbeins, Connections and Metrics on G/H
- •5.2.3.3 Lie Derivatives
- •5.2.3.4 Invariant Metrics on Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.5 For Spheres and Pseudo-Spheres
- •5.3 Homogeneity Without Isotropy: What Might Happen
- •5.3.1 Bianchi Spaces and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.1.1 Bianchi Type I and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.2.1 A Ricci Flat Bianchi II Metric
- •5.3.3 Einstein Equation and Matter for This Billiard
- •5.3.4 The Same Billiard with Some Matter Content
- •5.3.5 Three-Space Geometry of This Toy Model
- •5.4 The Standard Cosmological Model: Isotropic and Homogeneous Metrics
- •5.4.1 Viewing the Coset Manifolds as Group Manifolds
- •5.5 Friedman Equations for the Scale Factor and the Equation of State
- •5.5.1 Proof of the Cosmological Red-Shift
- •5.5.2 Solution of the Cosmological Differential Equations for Dust and Radiation Without a Cosmological Constant
- •5.5.3 Embedding Cosmologies into de Sitter Space
- •5.6 General Consequences of Friedman Equations
- •5.6.1 Particle Horizon
- •5.6.2 Event Horizon
- •5.6.3 Red-Shift Distances
- •5.7 Conceptual Problems of the Standard Cosmological Model
- •5.8 Cosmic Evolution with a Scalar Field: The Basis for Inflation
- •5.8.1 de Sitter Solution
- •5.8.2 Slow-Rolling Approximate Solutions
- •5.8.2.1 Number of e-Folds
- •5.9 Primordial Perturbations of the Cosmological Metric and of the Inflaton
- •5.9.1 The Conformal Frame
- •5.9.2 Deriving the Equations for the Perturbation
- •5.9.2.1 Meaning of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.2.2 Evaluation of the Effective Mass Term in the Slow Roll Approximation
- •5.9.2.3 Derivation of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.3 Quantization of the Scalar Degree of Freedom
- •5.9.4 Calculation of the Power Spectrum in the Two Regimes
- •5.9.4.1 Short Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.2 Long Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.3 Gluing the Long and Short Wave-Length Solutions Together
- •5.9.4.4 The Spectral Index
- •5.10 The Anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background
- •5.10.1 The Sachs-Wolfe Effect
- •5.10.2 The Two-Point Temperature Correlation Function
- •5.10.3 Conclusive Remarks on CMB Anisotropies
- •References
- •6.1 Historical Outline and Introduction
- •6.1.1 Fermionic Strings and the Birth of Supersymmetry
- •6.1.2 Supersymmetry
- •6.1.3 Supergravity
- •6.2 Algebro-Geometric Structure of Supergravity
- •6.3 Free Differential Algebras
- •6.3.1 Chevalley Cohomology
- •Contraction and Lie Derivative
- •Definition of FDA
- •Classification of FDA and the Analogue of Levi Theorem: Minimal Versus Contractible Algebras
- •6.4 The Super FDA of M Theory and Its Cohomological Structure
- •6.4.1 The Minimal FDA of M-Theory and Cohomology
- •6.4.2 FDA Equivalence with Larger (Super) Lie Algebras
- •6.5 The Principle of Rheonomy
- •6.5.1 The Flow Chart for the Construction of a Supergravity Theory
- •6.6 Summary of Supergravities
- •Type IIA Super-Poicaré Algebra in the String Frame
- •The FDA Extension of the Type IIA Superalgebra in the String Frame
- •The Bianchi Identities
- •6.7.1 Rheonomic Parameterizations of the Type IIA Curvatures in the String Frame
- •Bosonic Curvatures
- •Fermionic Curvatures
- •6.7.2 Field Equations of Type IIA Supergravity in the String Frame
- •6.8 Type IIB Supergravity
- •SL(2, R) Lie Algebra
- •Coset Representative of SL(2, R)/O(2) in the Solvable Parameterization
- •The SU(1, 1)/U(1) Vielbein and Connection
- •6.8.2 The Free Differential Algebra, the Supergravity Fields and the Curvatures
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Complex Basis
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Real Basis
- •6.8.3 The Bosonic Field Equations and the Standard Form of the Bosonic Action
- •6.9 About Solutions
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction and Conceptual Outline
- •7.2 p-Branes as World Volume Gauge-Theories
- •7.4 The New First Order Formalism
- •7.4.1 An Alternative to the Polyakov Action for p-Branes
- •7.6 The D3-Brane: Summary
- •7.9 Domain Walls in Diverse Space-Time Dimensions
- •7.9.1 The Randall Sundrum Mechanism
- •7.9.2 The Conformal Gauge for Domain Walls
- •7.10 Conclusion on This Brane Bestiary
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Supergravity and Homogeneous Scalar Manifolds G/H
- •8.2.3 Scalar Manifolds of Maximal Supergravities in Diverse Dimensions
- •8.3 Duality Symmetries in Even Dimensions
- •8.3.1 The Kinetic Matrix N and Symplectic Embeddings
- •8.3.2 Symplectic Embeddings in General
- •8.5 Summary of Special Kähler Geometry
- •8.5.1 Hodge-Kähler Manifolds
- •8.5.2 Connection on the Line Bundle
- •8.5.3 Special Kähler Manifolds
- •8.6 Supergravities in Five Dimension and More Scalar Geometries
- •8.6.1 Very Special Geometry
- •8.6.3 Quaternionic Geometry
- •8.6.4 Quaternionic, Versus HyperKähler Manifolds
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Black Holes Once Again
- •9.2.2 The Oxidation Rules
- •Orbit of Solutions
- •The Schwarzschild Case
- •The Extremal Reissner Nordström Case
- •Curvature of the Extremal Spaces
- •9.2.4 Attractor Mechanism, the Entropy and Other Special Geometry Invariants
- •9.2.5 Critical Points of the Geodesic Potential and Attractors
- •At BPS Attractor Points
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type I
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type II
- •9.2.6.2 The Quartic Invariant
- •9.2.7.1 An Explicit Example of Exact Regular BPS Solution
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •9.2.9 Resuming the Discussion of Critical Points
- •Non-BPS Case
- •BPS Case
- •9.2.10 An Example of a Small Black Hole
- •The Metric
- •The Complex Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Charges
- •Structure of the Charges and Attractor Mechanism
- •9.2.11 Behavior of the Riemann Tensor in Regular Solutions
- •9.3.4 The SO(8) Spinor Bundle and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.5 The Well Adapted Basis of Gamma Matrices
- •9.3.6 The so(8)-Connection and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.7 The Holonomy Tensor and Superspace
- •9.3.8 Gauged Maurer Cartan 1-Forms of OSp(8|4)
- •9.3.9 Killing Spinors of the AdS4 Manifold
- •9.3.10 Supergauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.3.11 The 3-Form
- •9.4.1 Maurer Cartan Forms of OSp(6|4)
- •9.4.2 Explicit Construction of the P3 Geometry
- •9.4.3 The Compactification Ansatz
- •9.4.4 Killing Spinors on P3
- •9.4.5 Gauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.4.6 Gauge Completion of the B[2] Form
- •9.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 The Legacy of Volume 1
- •10.2 The Story Told in Volume 2
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Auxiliary Tools for p-Brane Actions
- •B.1 Notations and Conventions
- •Appendix C: Auxiliary Information About Some Superalgebras
- •C.1.1 The Superalgebra
- •C.2 The Relevant Supercosets and Their Relation
- •C.2.1 Finite Supergroup Elements
- •C.4 An so(6) Inversion Formula
- •Appendix D: MATHEMATICA Package NOVAMANIFOLDA
- •Coset Manifolds (Euclidian Signature)
- •Instructions for the Use
- •Description of the Main Commands of RUNCOSET
- •Structure Constants for CP2
- •Spheres
- •N010 Coset
- •RUNCOSET Package (Euclidian Signature)
- •Main
- •Spin Connection and Curvature Routines
- •Routine Curvapack
- •Routine Curvapackgen
- •Contorsion Routine for Mixed Vielbeins
- •Calculation of the Contorsion for General Manifolds
- •Calculation for Cartan Maurer Equations and Vielbein Differentials (Euclidian Signature)
- •Routine Thoft
- •AdS Space in Four Dimensions (Minkowski Signature)
- •Lie Algebra of SO(2, 3) and Killing Metric
- •Solvable Subalgebra Generating the Coset and Construction of the Vielbein
- •Killing Vectors
- •Trigonometric Coordinates
- •Test of Killing Vectors
- •MANIFOLDPROVA
- •The 4-Dimensional Coset CP2
- •Calculation of the (Pseudo-)Riemannian Geometry of a Kasner Metric in Vielbein Formalism
- •References
- •Index
2.5 The Causal Boundary of Kruskal Space-Time |
37 |
Fig. 2.19 The causal boundary of Minkowski space following Ashtekar definition
Future and Causal Past of the considered space-time, namely the locus where terminate future-directed and past-directed causal curves, respectively. In the case of Minkowski space we were able to make a finer distinction by decomposing:
J ± = i± J ± |
(2.4.34) |
where i± correspond to Future and Past Time-Infinity, while J ± are Future and Past Null-Infinities.
Point (3) of the definition is also visually evident in the case of Minkowski space and aims at excluding pathological space-times where causal curves might have chaotic behavior.
Points (4) and (5) are also extracted from the example of Minkowski space mapped into the Einstein Static Universe. There the conformal factor is
|
= |
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
≡ |
|
+ |
|
|
Ω |
|
1 |
cos |
|
|
T + R |
|
cos |
T − R |
|
cos T |
|
cos R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
which vanishes on the two straight-lines:
{ξ, ξ + π }; {ξ, −ξ + π } |
(2.4.35) |
so, in particular on the two loci J ±.
2.5 The Causal Boundary of Kruskal Space-Time
Let us now consider the Kruskal extension of the Schwarzschild metric given in (2.2.30) where the variable r is implicitly defined by its relation with T and X,
38 |
2 Extended Space-Times, Causal Structure and Penrose Diagrams |
Fig. 2.20 The Spatial Infinity of Kruskal space-time and its Future and Past
namely:
T 2 − X2 = r − 1 exp r rS rS
Let us introduce the further change of variables defined below:
|
= |
2 |
|
|
2 |
+ |
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
T |
|
1 |
tan |
|
τ + ρ |
|
|
1 |
tan |
|
τ − ρ |
|
= |
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2 |
|
2 |
2 |
|
2 |
||||||
X |
|
1 |
tan |
|
τ + ρ |
|
|
1 |
tan |
|
τ − ρ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By means of straightforward substitutions we find that:
dsKrusk2 = |
Ω−2 dsKrusk2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
2 |
|
= |
4 |
r3 |
exp |
|
r |
|
dτ 2 |
+ |
dρ2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
dsKrusk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
r |
|
r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
S |
|
|
− |
S |
− |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
+ r2(cos τ + cos ρ)2 dθ 2 + sin2 θ dφ2 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
0 |
|
tan |
|
|
τ + ρ |
|
|
tan |
τ − ρ |
|
|
|
r |
|
1 |
exp |
r |
|
|||
|
= |
|
2 |
|
|
|
+ rS |
− |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
rS |
|||||||||||||||
|
Ω = |
(cos τ + cos ρ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.5.1)
(2.5.2)
(2.5.3)
(2.5.4)
(2.5.5)
(2.5.6)
This calculation shows that the map ψ defined by the coordinate substitution (2.5.2)
is indeed a conformal map, the new metric being ds2Krusk defined by (2.5.4) and the conformal factor being Ω defined in (2.5.6). Let us then verify that Kruskal space-
time is asymptotically flat and study the causal structure of its boundary. To this effect let us consider Fig. 2.20. Just as in the case of Minkowski space we represent the four-dimensional space-time by means of a two-dimensional picture where each point actually stands for a two-sphere spanned by the coordinates {θ, φ}. The points are located in the {τ, ρ} plane and such kind of visualization receives the name of
Penrose diagram (Fig. 2.21).
As in the case of Minkowski space we first look for Spatial Infinity and we find that in the plane {τ, ρ} it is given by the following pair of points:
i0 ≡ {π, 0} {−π, 0} (2.5.7)
2.5 The Causal Boundary of Kruskal Space-Time |
39 |
Fig. 2.21 Sir Roger Penrose, was born in 1931 in Colchester (England) and he is Emeritus Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics at the University of Oxford. His main contributions have been to Mathematical Physics in the fields of Relativity and Quantum Field Theory. He invented the twistor approach to Lorentzian field theories which maps geometrical metric data of a real manifold into holomorphic data in a complex manifold with signature (2, 2). He was the first to propose the cosmic censorship hypothesis according to which space-time singularities are always hidden behind event-horizons and he conceived the idealized Penrose mechanism which shows how energy can be extracted from rotating black-holes. Probably the most famous of his results is the quasi-periodic Penrose tiling of the plane with five-fold rotational symmetry. Roger Penrose is also an amateur philosopher whose views on consciousness and its relation with quantum physics are quite original and source of intense debate
Indeed this is the locus where terminate the images of all space-like curves. The duplication of i0 is due to the periodicity of the trigonometric functions and it occurs also in Minkowski case. There it was disregarded because all copies of i0, namely {(2n + 1)π, 0}, (n Z) could be identified without ambiguity. In the Kruskal case,
instead, as we are going to see, iI0 = {π, 0} and iIV0 = {−π, 0} must be considered as distinct physical points since they are separated by the black-hole region which we
are now going to discuss.
Following the scheme outlined in previous section, we search for the causal future and causal past of i0 inside the extended manifold (MKrusk, g˜Krusk). At this level a fundamental new feature appears with respect to Minkowski case where, reduced to the plane {T , R}, the manifold MMink was identified with the infinite vertical strip depicted in Fig. 2.19. In the Kruskal case, on the contrary, also the embedding manifold MKrusk corresponds to a finite region of the {τ, ρ} plane, namely the following rectangular region:
{τ, ρ} MKrusk − |
π |
≤ τ ≤ |
π |
and − π ≤ ρ ≤ π |
(2.5.8) |
|
|
||||
2 |
2 |
40 |
2 Extended Space-Times, Causal Structure and Penrose Diagrams |
Fig. 2.22 The Penrose diagram of Kruskal space-time
The upper and lower limits on the variable τ are consequences of the form of the metric g˜Krusk defined in (2.5.4). This latter becomes singular when r = 0 and from (2.5.5) we realize that this singularity is mapped into τ = ± π2 . Hence no causal curve can trespass such limits which become a boundary for the manifold (MKrusk, g˜Krusk). The range of the variable ρ is fixed instead by modding out the periodicity ρ → ρ + 2nπ .
Once (2.5.8) is established, it is fairly easy to conclude that the Causal Future and Causal Past of Spatial Infinity are indeed the lighter regions of the rectangle depicted in Fig. 2.20. The corresponding boundaries are:
∂J +(i0) = |
2 ξ, − 2 ξ + π |
2 ξ, |
2 ξ − π ; ξ [0, 1] |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
π |
|
π |
|
π |
|
π |
(2.5.9) |
||
∂J −(i0) = |
− 2 |
ξ, − 2 ξ + π |
− |
|
2 ξ, |
||||||||
|
2 ξ − π ; ξ [0, 1] |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
π |
|
|
π |
|
|
π |
π |
and on these boundaries the conformal factor (2.5.6) vanishes. Hence all necessary conditions are satisfied and the Kruskal extension of Schwarzschild space-time is indeed asymptotically flat.
We can now inspect the causal structure of conformal infinity and we are led to consider the more detailed diagram of Fig. 2.22, which is the conformal image in the {τ, ρ} plane of the diagram 2.8 drawn in the {T , X} plane. We easily identify in Fig. 2.22 the points i that correspond to time-like Past and Future Infinity, respectively. Just as it was the case for Spatial Infinity also these Infinities have a double representation in the diagram. Similarly Past and Future Null Infinities are twice represented and correspond to the segments with ±45 degrees orientation shown in Fig. 2.22. The conformal image of the singularity r = 0 is also double and it is provided by the two segments, upper and lower, parallel to the ordinate axis depicted in Fig. 2.22. The conformal image of the event horizon X2 − T 2 = 0 is provided by the two internal lines splitting the hexagon of Fig. 2.22 into four separate regions.
Let us know consider, using the language developed in previous sections, the Causal Past of Future-Null Infinity namely J −(J +). By definition this is the set of all space-time events p such that there exists at least one causal curve starting at p
2.5 The Causal Boundary of Kruskal Space-Time |
41 |
Fig. 2.23 The Causal Past of Future Null Infinity is composed of two-sheets. The Causal Past of JI+ and the Causal Past of JIV+ . The first corresponds to the region shaded by lines in the picture on the left, the second to the region shaded by lines in the picture on the right
and ending on J +. Since J + is the union of two disconnected loci: |
|
J + = JI+ JIV+ |
(2.5.10) |
we actually have: |
|
J − J + = J − JI+ J − JIV+ |
(2.5.11) |
A simple inspection of the Penrose diagram shows that the Causal Past of Future Null Infinity is given by the regions shown in Fig. 2.23, namely we have:
J − J + = I |
III |
IV |
J − JI+ = I |
III |
(2.5.12) |
J − JIV+ = III IV
This conclusion is simply reached with the following argument. The image of lightlike geodesics in the Penrose diagram is given by the straight lines with ±45 degrees orientation; hence it suffices to trace all lines that have such an inclination and which intersect Future Null Infinity. The result is precisely that of (2.5.12), depicted in Fig. 2.23.
In this way we discover a very important feature of region II, namely we find that it has empty intersection with the Causal Past of Future Null Infinity:
II ! J −(J +) = . This property provides a rigorous mathematical formulation of that object cut off from communication with the rest of the universe which was firstly conceived by Openheimer and Snyder as end-point result of the gravitational collapse of super massive stars.
Inspired by the case of Kruskal space-time we can now present the general definition of black-holes:
Definition 2.5.1 Let (M , g) be an asymptotically flat space time and let J + denote the Future Null Infinity component of its causal boundary. A black-hole region BH M is a sub-manifold of this space-time with the following defining property:
BH J − J + = |
(2.5.13) |