- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •2.1 Introduction and a Short History of Black Holes
- •2.2 The Kruskal Extension of Schwarzschild Space-Time
- •2.2.1 Analysis of the Rindler Space-Time
- •2.2.2 Applying the Same Procedure to the Schwarzschild Metric
- •2.2.3 A First Analysis of Kruskal Space-Time
- •2.3 Basic Concepts about Future, Past and Causality
- •2.3.1 The Light-Cone
- •2.3.2 Future and Past of Events and Regions
- •Achronal Sets
- •Time-Orientability
- •Domains of Dependence
- •Cauchy surfaces
- •2.4.1 Conformal Mapping of Minkowski Space into the Einstein Static Universe
- •2.4.2 Asymptotic Flatness
- •2.5 The Causal Boundary of Kruskal Space-Time
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 The Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.2.1 Riemann and Ricci Curvatures of the Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.3 The Static Limit in Kerr-Newman Space-Time
- •Static Observers
- •3.4 The Horizon and the Ergosphere
- •The Horizon Area
- •3.5 Geodesics of the Kerr Metric
- •3.5.2 The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation and the Carter Constant
- •3.5.3 Reduction to First Order Equations
- •3.5.4 The Exact Solution of the Schwarzschild Orbit Equation as an Application
- •3.5.5 About Explicit Kerr Geodesics
- •3.6 The Kerr Black Hole and the Laws of Thermodynamics
- •3.6.1 The Penrose Mechanism
- •3.6.2 The Bekenstein Hawking Entropy and Hawking Radiation
- •References
- •4.1 Historical Introduction to Modern Cosmology
- •4.2 The Universe Is a Dynamical System
- •4.3 Expansion of the Universe
- •4.3.1 Why the Night is Dark and Olbers Paradox
- •4.3.2 Hubble, the Galaxies and the Great Debate
- •4.3.4 The Big Bang
- •4.4 The Cosmological Principle
- •4.5 The Cosmic Background Radiation
- •4.6 The New Scenario of the Inflationary Universe
- •4.7 The End of the Second Millennium and the Dawn of the Third Bring Great News in Cosmology
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Mathematical Interlude: Isometries and the Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.1 Isometries and Killing Vector Fields
- •5.2.2 Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3 The Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.1 Infinitesimal Transformations and Killing Vectors
- •5.2.3.2 Vielbeins, Connections and Metrics on G/H
- •5.2.3.3 Lie Derivatives
- •5.2.3.4 Invariant Metrics on Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.5 For Spheres and Pseudo-Spheres
- •5.3 Homogeneity Without Isotropy: What Might Happen
- •5.3.1 Bianchi Spaces and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.1.1 Bianchi Type I and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.2.1 A Ricci Flat Bianchi II Metric
- •5.3.3 Einstein Equation and Matter for This Billiard
- •5.3.4 The Same Billiard with Some Matter Content
- •5.3.5 Three-Space Geometry of This Toy Model
- •5.4 The Standard Cosmological Model: Isotropic and Homogeneous Metrics
- •5.4.1 Viewing the Coset Manifolds as Group Manifolds
- •5.5 Friedman Equations for the Scale Factor and the Equation of State
- •5.5.1 Proof of the Cosmological Red-Shift
- •5.5.2 Solution of the Cosmological Differential Equations for Dust and Radiation Without a Cosmological Constant
- •5.5.3 Embedding Cosmologies into de Sitter Space
- •5.6 General Consequences of Friedman Equations
- •5.6.1 Particle Horizon
- •5.6.2 Event Horizon
- •5.6.3 Red-Shift Distances
- •5.7 Conceptual Problems of the Standard Cosmological Model
- •5.8 Cosmic Evolution with a Scalar Field: The Basis for Inflation
- •5.8.1 de Sitter Solution
- •5.8.2 Slow-Rolling Approximate Solutions
- •5.8.2.1 Number of e-Folds
- •5.9 Primordial Perturbations of the Cosmological Metric and of the Inflaton
- •5.9.1 The Conformal Frame
- •5.9.2 Deriving the Equations for the Perturbation
- •5.9.2.1 Meaning of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.2.2 Evaluation of the Effective Mass Term in the Slow Roll Approximation
- •5.9.2.3 Derivation of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.3 Quantization of the Scalar Degree of Freedom
- •5.9.4 Calculation of the Power Spectrum in the Two Regimes
- •5.9.4.1 Short Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.2 Long Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.3 Gluing the Long and Short Wave-Length Solutions Together
- •5.9.4.4 The Spectral Index
- •5.10 The Anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background
- •5.10.1 The Sachs-Wolfe Effect
- •5.10.2 The Two-Point Temperature Correlation Function
- •5.10.3 Conclusive Remarks on CMB Anisotropies
- •References
- •6.1 Historical Outline and Introduction
- •6.1.1 Fermionic Strings and the Birth of Supersymmetry
- •6.1.2 Supersymmetry
- •6.1.3 Supergravity
- •6.2 Algebro-Geometric Structure of Supergravity
- •6.3 Free Differential Algebras
- •6.3.1 Chevalley Cohomology
- •Contraction and Lie Derivative
- •Definition of FDA
- •Classification of FDA and the Analogue of Levi Theorem: Minimal Versus Contractible Algebras
- •6.4 The Super FDA of M Theory and Its Cohomological Structure
- •6.4.1 The Minimal FDA of M-Theory and Cohomology
- •6.4.2 FDA Equivalence with Larger (Super) Lie Algebras
- •6.5 The Principle of Rheonomy
- •6.5.1 The Flow Chart for the Construction of a Supergravity Theory
- •6.6 Summary of Supergravities
- •Type IIA Super-Poicaré Algebra in the String Frame
- •The FDA Extension of the Type IIA Superalgebra in the String Frame
- •The Bianchi Identities
- •6.7.1 Rheonomic Parameterizations of the Type IIA Curvatures in the String Frame
- •Bosonic Curvatures
- •Fermionic Curvatures
- •6.7.2 Field Equations of Type IIA Supergravity in the String Frame
- •6.8 Type IIB Supergravity
- •SL(2, R) Lie Algebra
- •Coset Representative of SL(2, R)/O(2) in the Solvable Parameterization
- •The SU(1, 1)/U(1) Vielbein and Connection
- •6.8.2 The Free Differential Algebra, the Supergravity Fields and the Curvatures
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Complex Basis
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Real Basis
- •6.8.3 The Bosonic Field Equations and the Standard Form of the Bosonic Action
- •6.9 About Solutions
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction and Conceptual Outline
- •7.2 p-Branes as World Volume Gauge-Theories
- •7.4 The New First Order Formalism
- •7.4.1 An Alternative to the Polyakov Action for p-Branes
- •7.6 The D3-Brane: Summary
- •7.9 Domain Walls in Diverse Space-Time Dimensions
- •7.9.1 The Randall Sundrum Mechanism
- •7.9.2 The Conformal Gauge for Domain Walls
- •7.10 Conclusion on This Brane Bestiary
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Supergravity and Homogeneous Scalar Manifolds G/H
- •8.2.3 Scalar Manifolds of Maximal Supergravities in Diverse Dimensions
- •8.3 Duality Symmetries in Even Dimensions
- •8.3.1 The Kinetic Matrix N and Symplectic Embeddings
- •8.3.2 Symplectic Embeddings in General
- •8.5 Summary of Special Kähler Geometry
- •8.5.1 Hodge-Kähler Manifolds
- •8.5.2 Connection on the Line Bundle
- •8.5.3 Special Kähler Manifolds
- •8.6 Supergravities in Five Dimension and More Scalar Geometries
- •8.6.1 Very Special Geometry
- •8.6.3 Quaternionic Geometry
- •8.6.4 Quaternionic, Versus HyperKähler Manifolds
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Black Holes Once Again
- •9.2.2 The Oxidation Rules
- •Orbit of Solutions
- •The Schwarzschild Case
- •The Extremal Reissner Nordström Case
- •Curvature of the Extremal Spaces
- •9.2.4 Attractor Mechanism, the Entropy and Other Special Geometry Invariants
- •9.2.5 Critical Points of the Geodesic Potential and Attractors
- •At BPS Attractor Points
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type I
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type II
- •9.2.6.2 The Quartic Invariant
- •9.2.7.1 An Explicit Example of Exact Regular BPS Solution
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •9.2.9 Resuming the Discussion of Critical Points
- •Non-BPS Case
- •BPS Case
- •9.2.10 An Example of a Small Black Hole
- •The Metric
- •The Complex Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Charges
- •Structure of the Charges and Attractor Mechanism
- •9.2.11 Behavior of the Riemann Tensor in Regular Solutions
- •9.3.4 The SO(8) Spinor Bundle and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.5 The Well Adapted Basis of Gamma Matrices
- •9.3.6 The so(8)-Connection and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.7 The Holonomy Tensor and Superspace
- •9.3.8 Gauged Maurer Cartan 1-Forms of OSp(8|4)
- •9.3.9 Killing Spinors of the AdS4 Manifold
- •9.3.10 Supergauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.3.11 The 3-Form
- •9.4.1 Maurer Cartan Forms of OSp(6|4)
- •9.4.2 Explicit Construction of the P3 Geometry
- •9.4.3 The Compactification Ansatz
- •9.4.4 Killing Spinors on P3
- •9.4.5 Gauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.4.6 Gauge Completion of the B[2] Form
- •9.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 The Legacy of Volume 1
- •10.2 The Story Told in Volume 2
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Auxiliary Tools for p-Brane Actions
- •B.1 Notations and Conventions
- •Appendix C: Auxiliary Information About Some Superalgebras
- •C.1.1 The Superalgebra
- •C.2 The Relevant Supercosets and Their Relation
- •C.2.1 Finite Supergroup Elements
- •C.4 An so(6) Inversion Formula
- •Appendix D: MATHEMATICA Package NOVAMANIFOLDA
- •Coset Manifolds (Euclidian Signature)
- •Instructions for the Use
- •Description of the Main Commands of RUNCOSET
- •Structure Constants for CP2
- •Spheres
- •N010 Coset
- •RUNCOSET Package (Euclidian Signature)
- •Main
- •Spin Connection and Curvature Routines
- •Routine Curvapack
- •Routine Curvapackgen
- •Contorsion Routine for Mixed Vielbeins
- •Calculation of the Contorsion for General Manifolds
- •Calculation for Cartan Maurer Equations and Vielbein Differentials (Euclidian Signature)
- •Routine Thoft
- •AdS Space in Four Dimensions (Minkowski Signature)
- •Lie Algebra of SO(2, 3) and Killing Metric
- •Solvable Subalgebra Generating the Coset and Construction of the Vielbein
- •Killing Vectors
- •Trigonometric Coordinates
- •Test of Killing Vectors
- •MANIFOLDPROVA
- •The 4-Dimensional Coset CP2
- •Calculation of the (Pseudo-)Riemannian Geometry of a Kasner Metric in Vielbein Formalism
- •References
- •Index
5.9 Primordial Perturbations of the Cosmological Metric and of the Inflaton |
195 |
This concludes the proof of what we stated above, namely that there is only one independent scalar degrees of freedom, corresponding to the free field v which propagates in the effective conformally flat space-time (5.9.28) with scale factor λ(η) = θ (η). Indeed the relevant point is that the fields u and v are not independent being related by a first order differential equation in η that can always be integrated yielding u in terms of v. Hence the effective field u can be quantized and the modes of both δϕ and Ψ can be uniquely expressed in terms of the modes of u.
5.9.3 Quantization of the Scalar Degree of Freedom
As a next step we can proceed to the canonical quantization of the scalar degree of freedom we have singled out in the previous sections. Following standard procedures we turn the classical field u(η, x) into an operator-valued distribution u(η,ˆ x) and we introduce the expansion of the latter into Fourier modes:
u(η, x) = (2π )3/2 |
|
d3k aˆkuk(η) exp[ik · x] + aˆk†uk(η) exp[−ik · x] |
(5.9.55) |
1 |
|
|
|
Inserting (5.9.55) into (5.9.54) we find that for each momentum vector k the corresponding wave function uk(η) satisfies the following equation:
u + κ2 − θ uk = 0
k θ
(5.9.56)
κ2 = k · k
We consider the case where the mass term θθ takes the slow-rolling approximate form derived in (5.9.41) and we obtain the following equation:
uk + |
κ2 − |
2 |
|
η2 μ uk = 0 |
(5.9.57) |
where the parameter μ allows to interpolate between various notable cases. If μ = 0 we are actually discussing propagation in Minkowski space. For μ = 1 we retrieve the propagation equation in de Sitter space (see (5.9.34)). For all the intermediate values 0 < μ < 1 we describe propagation in the background of a slow-rolling universe and the almost constant small parameter μ is given in (5.9.41).
Equation (5.9.57) is actually the Bessel equation in slightly modified variables and its solutions can be constructed by means of Bessel functions for all values of μ. Introducing the index
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
1 + 8μ |
|
|||||||
ν = |
|
|
(5.9.58) |
|||||||
2 |
||||||||||
we can easily verify that the following two functions |
|
|||||||||
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
|||
ψ±(η, κ, ν) = − |
π |
|
Jν (ηκ) ± iYν (ηκ) |
(5.9.59) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
η |
||||||
2κ |
196 |
5 Cosmology and General Relativity |
form a complete basis of solutions of the second order equation (5.9.57), namely we have:
uk(η) = c+ψ+(η, κ, ν) + c−ψ−(η, κ, ν) |
(5.9.60) |
where c± are the two integration constants to be fixed by means of boundary conditions.
In view of the remarks put forward few lines above, we expect that the lower and upper extremes of the μ interval, namely μ = 0 ν = 12 and μ = 1 ν = 32 should present distinguished features corresponding to Minkowski and de Sitter space, respectively. Indeed we find:
1
ψ± η, κ,
2
3
ψ± η, κ,
2
e±iηκ
=±i √
κ2κ
e±iηκ (1 ± i )
=√ ηκ
κ2κ
(5.9.61)
(5.9.62)
In Minkowski space the wave function is a pure phase, its modulus being constant
and equal to √1 . In de Sitter space there are two regimes. For κη & 1 the wave
2κ
function behaves as in Minkowski space with an oscillating phase and a constant modulus. For small values of κη, instead, the modulus of the wave function diverges
as κ1η .
As we are going to see shortly below, these two regimes have a profound cosmological significance, being related with the distinction between frozen modes that have exited the event-horizon and active modes which, being within the horizon, are subject to modification by means of interactions with the other modes. This tworegime structure of the de Sitter solution is actually generic for all values of μ and follows from the asymptotic expansions of Bessel functions at low and large values of their arguments. Indeed we have:
|
|
|
|
→ |
± |
|
ηκ |
|
|
+ |
|
− |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
0 2−ν−1√ |
|
|
i4ν ( |
1 |
|
)ν Γ (ν)Γ (ν |
|
1) |
|
π(ηκ)ν ) |
||||||
|
|
|
κη |
|
η( |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
ψ±(η, κ, ν) |
≈ |
|
|
|
|
κ√ |
|
Γ (ν |
+ |
1) |
|
|
|
|
(5.9.63) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
π |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
ψ |
|
(η, κ, ν) |
κη→∞ |
(−1)3/4e±i(ηκ− π2ν ) |
|
|
|
|
|
(5.9.64) |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
± |
|
≈ |
|
κ√ |
π κ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let us now implement the canonical quantization of the free-field system by imposing the standard canonical commutation relations on the creation-annihilation operators:
aˆk, aˆk† = δ3 k − k |
(5.9.65) |
This corresponds to the standard canonical equal time commutation relations:
u(η,ˆ x), πˆu(η, y) = i δ3 x − y |
(5.9.66) |
5.9 Primordial Perturbations of the Cosmological Metric and of the Inflaton |
197 |
where πˆu(η, y) = ∂ηu(η,ˆ x), if the wave-function (5.9.60) is properly normalized in such a way that:
uk(η)∂η |
|
k(η) − |
|
k(η)∂ηuk(η) = i |
(5.9.67) |
u |
u |
There are many choices of the wave function (coefficients c±) consistent with the normalization condition (5.9.67). Every such choice is associated with a different decomposition into creation and annihilation modes and therefore with a different vacuum |0! which, as usual, is defined by the condition:
aˆk|0! = 0 |
(5.9.68) |
A proper normalization of the wave function is provided by the observation that for late times η → ∞, or, equivalently, for very short wave-lengths κ → ∞, we approach an effective Minkowski scenario, where the effects of space-time curvature are negligible. Hence we can just choose the normalization of the wave-function which corresponds to the association with the creation operator of a standard outgoing wave in the late time regime, namely:
c+ = 0; c− = 1 |
(5.9.69) |
Having so done we are in a position to calculate the two-point correlation function of the field u(η,ˆ x) or better of the gravitational potential Φ(η,7 x), which is related to u(η,ˆ x) by (5.9.50).
Setting:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
σk = |
ϕ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.9.70) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
uk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
by means of a standard calculation we find: |
|
k + k |
|
|
× |σk|2 exp i k · x + k · y |
||||||||||||
0|Φ(η, x)Φ(η, y)|0! = (2π )3 |
d3k d3k δ(3) |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
7 |
7 |
1 |
|
|
|
d3k exp ik · (x − y) |
|
|σk|2 |
|
||||||||
|
= |
(2π )3 |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
= |
2π 2 |
|
κ2 dκ d cos θ dφ exp iκ|x − y| cos θ |σκ |2 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
= |
1 |
|
PΦ (κ) |
sin(κr) dκ |
|
|
|
(5.9.71) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
2π 2 |
|
κr |
|
κ |
|
|
|
where, in the last line, we have used the definitions:
r ≡ |
|
(x − y) · (x − y) |
|
2 |
|
uκ (η) 2κ3 |
(5.9.72) |
|||||||
PΦ (κ) |
|
|
σk(η) |
|
2κ3 |
|
a |
|
|
(5.9.73) |
||||
|
≡ |
8 |
|
|
8 |
|
= |
ϕ |
|
|
8 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
8 |
|
The function PΦ (κ) is named the power spectrum and it is the main target of all calculations since, supposedly, it is an experimentally accessible datum through the observation of anisotropies in the cosmic background radiation.