- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •2.1 Introduction and a Short History of Black Holes
- •2.2 The Kruskal Extension of Schwarzschild Space-Time
- •2.2.1 Analysis of the Rindler Space-Time
- •2.2.2 Applying the Same Procedure to the Schwarzschild Metric
- •2.2.3 A First Analysis of Kruskal Space-Time
- •2.3 Basic Concepts about Future, Past and Causality
- •2.3.1 The Light-Cone
- •2.3.2 Future and Past of Events and Regions
- •Achronal Sets
- •Time-Orientability
- •Domains of Dependence
- •Cauchy surfaces
- •2.4.1 Conformal Mapping of Minkowski Space into the Einstein Static Universe
- •2.4.2 Asymptotic Flatness
- •2.5 The Causal Boundary of Kruskal Space-Time
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 The Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.2.1 Riemann and Ricci Curvatures of the Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.3 The Static Limit in Kerr-Newman Space-Time
- •Static Observers
- •3.4 The Horizon and the Ergosphere
- •The Horizon Area
- •3.5 Geodesics of the Kerr Metric
- •3.5.2 The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation and the Carter Constant
- •3.5.3 Reduction to First Order Equations
- •3.5.4 The Exact Solution of the Schwarzschild Orbit Equation as an Application
- •3.5.5 About Explicit Kerr Geodesics
- •3.6 The Kerr Black Hole and the Laws of Thermodynamics
- •3.6.1 The Penrose Mechanism
- •3.6.2 The Bekenstein Hawking Entropy and Hawking Radiation
- •References
- •4.1 Historical Introduction to Modern Cosmology
- •4.2 The Universe Is a Dynamical System
- •4.3 Expansion of the Universe
- •4.3.1 Why the Night is Dark and Olbers Paradox
- •4.3.2 Hubble, the Galaxies and the Great Debate
- •4.3.4 The Big Bang
- •4.4 The Cosmological Principle
- •4.5 The Cosmic Background Radiation
- •4.6 The New Scenario of the Inflationary Universe
- •4.7 The End of the Second Millennium and the Dawn of the Third Bring Great News in Cosmology
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Mathematical Interlude: Isometries and the Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.1 Isometries and Killing Vector Fields
- •5.2.2 Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3 The Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.1 Infinitesimal Transformations and Killing Vectors
- •5.2.3.2 Vielbeins, Connections and Metrics on G/H
- •5.2.3.3 Lie Derivatives
- •5.2.3.4 Invariant Metrics on Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.5 For Spheres and Pseudo-Spheres
- •5.3 Homogeneity Without Isotropy: What Might Happen
- •5.3.1 Bianchi Spaces and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.1.1 Bianchi Type I and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.2.1 A Ricci Flat Bianchi II Metric
- •5.3.3 Einstein Equation and Matter for This Billiard
- •5.3.4 The Same Billiard with Some Matter Content
- •5.3.5 Three-Space Geometry of This Toy Model
- •5.4 The Standard Cosmological Model: Isotropic and Homogeneous Metrics
- •5.4.1 Viewing the Coset Manifolds as Group Manifolds
- •5.5 Friedman Equations for the Scale Factor and the Equation of State
- •5.5.1 Proof of the Cosmological Red-Shift
- •5.5.2 Solution of the Cosmological Differential Equations for Dust and Radiation Without a Cosmological Constant
- •5.5.3 Embedding Cosmologies into de Sitter Space
- •5.6 General Consequences of Friedman Equations
- •5.6.1 Particle Horizon
- •5.6.2 Event Horizon
- •5.6.3 Red-Shift Distances
- •5.7 Conceptual Problems of the Standard Cosmological Model
- •5.8 Cosmic Evolution with a Scalar Field: The Basis for Inflation
- •5.8.1 de Sitter Solution
- •5.8.2 Slow-Rolling Approximate Solutions
- •5.8.2.1 Number of e-Folds
- •5.9 Primordial Perturbations of the Cosmological Metric and of the Inflaton
- •5.9.1 The Conformal Frame
- •5.9.2 Deriving the Equations for the Perturbation
- •5.9.2.1 Meaning of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.2.2 Evaluation of the Effective Mass Term in the Slow Roll Approximation
- •5.9.2.3 Derivation of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.3 Quantization of the Scalar Degree of Freedom
- •5.9.4 Calculation of the Power Spectrum in the Two Regimes
- •5.9.4.1 Short Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.2 Long Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.3 Gluing the Long and Short Wave-Length Solutions Together
- •5.9.4.4 The Spectral Index
- •5.10 The Anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background
- •5.10.1 The Sachs-Wolfe Effect
- •5.10.2 The Two-Point Temperature Correlation Function
- •5.10.3 Conclusive Remarks on CMB Anisotropies
- •References
- •6.1 Historical Outline and Introduction
- •6.1.1 Fermionic Strings and the Birth of Supersymmetry
- •6.1.2 Supersymmetry
- •6.1.3 Supergravity
- •6.2 Algebro-Geometric Structure of Supergravity
- •6.3 Free Differential Algebras
- •6.3.1 Chevalley Cohomology
- •Contraction and Lie Derivative
- •Definition of FDA
- •Classification of FDA and the Analogue of Levi Theorem: Minimal Versus Contractible Algebras
- •6.4 The Super FDA of M Theory and Its Cohomological Structure
- •6.4.1 The Minimal FDA of M-Theory and Cohomology
- •6.4.2 FDA Equivalence with Larger (Super) Lie Algebras
- •6.5 The Principle of Rheonomy
- •6.5.1 The Flow Chart for the Construction of a Supergravity Theory
- •6.6 Summary of Supergravities
- •Type IIA Super-Poicaré Algebra in the String Frame
- •The FDA Extension of the Type IIA Superalgebra in the String Frame
- •The Bianchi Identities
- •6.7.1 Rheonomic Parameterizations of the Type IIA Curvatures in the String Frame
- •Bosonic Curvatures
- •Fermionic Curvatures
- •6.7.2 Field Equations of Type IIA Supergravity in the String Frame
- •6.8 Type IIB Supergravity
- •SL(2, R) Lie Algebra
- •Coset Representative of SL(2, R)/O(2) in the Solvable Parameterization
- •The SU(1, 1)/U(1) Vielbein and Connection
- •6.8.2 The Free Differential Algebra, the Supergravity Fields and the Curvatures
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Complex Basis
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Real Basis
- •6.8.3 The Bosonic Field Equations and the Standard Form of the Bosonic Action
- •6.9 About Solutions
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction and Conceptual Outline
- •7.2 p-Branes as World Volume Gauge-Theories
- •7.4 The New First Order Formalism
- •7.4.1 An Alternative to the Polyakov Action for p-Branes
- •7.6 The D3-Brane: Summary
- •7.9 Domain Walls in Diverse Space-Time Dimensions
- •7.9.1 The Randall Sundrum Mechanism
- •7.9.2 The Conformal Gauge for Domain Walls
- •7.10 Conclusion on This Brane Bestiary
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Supergravity and Homogeneous Scalar Manifolds G/H
- •8.2.3 Scalar Manifolds of Maximal Supergravities in Diverse Dimensions
- •8.3 Duality Symmetries in Even Dimensions
- •8.3.1 The Kinetic Matrix N and Symplectic Embeddings
- •8.3.2 Symplectic Embeddings in General
- •8.5 Summary of Special Kähler Geometry
- •8.5.1 Hodge-Kähler Manifolds
- •8.5.2 Connection on the Line Bundle
- •8.5.3 Special Kähler Manifolds
- •8.6 Supergravities in Five Dimension and More Scalar Geometries
- •8.6.1 Very Special Geometry
- •8.6.3 Quaternionic Geometry
- •8.6.4 Quaternionic, Versus HyperKähler Manifolds
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Black Holes Once Again
- •9.2.2 The Oxidation Rules
- •Orbit of Solutions
- •The Schwarzschild Case
- •The Extremal Reissner Nordström Case
- •Curvature of the Extremal Spaces
- •9.2.4 Attractor Mechanism, the Entropy and Other Special Geometry Invariants
- •9.2.5 Critical Points of the Geodesic Potential and Attractors
- •At BPS Attractor Points
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type I
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type II
- •9.2.6.2 The Quartic Invariant
- •9.2.7.1 An Explicit Example of Exact Regular BPS Solution
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •9.2.9 Resuming the Discussion of Critical Points
- •Non-BPS Case
- •BPS Case
- •9.2.10 An Example of a Small Black Hole
- •The Metric
- •The Complex Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Charges
- •Structure of the Charges and Attractor Mechanism
- •9.2.11 Behavior of the Riemann Tensor in Regular Solutions
- •9.3.4 The SO(8) Spinor Bundle and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.5 The Well Adapted Basis of Gamma Matrices
- •9.3.6 The so(8)-Connection and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.7 The Holonomy Tensor and Superspace
- •9.3.8 Gauged Maurer Cartan 1-Forms of OSp(8|4)
- •9.3.9 Killing Spinors of the AdS4 Manifold
- •9.3.10 Supergauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.3.11 The 3-Form
- •9.4.1 Maurer Cartan Forms of OSp(6|4)
- •9.4.2 Explicit Construction of the P3 Geometry
- •9.4.3 The Compactification Ansatz
- •9.4.4 Killing Spinors on P3
- •9.4.5 Gauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.4.6 Gauge Completion of the B[2] Form
- •9.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 The Legacy of Volume 1
- •10.2 The Story Told in Volume 2
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Auxiliary Tools for p-Brane Actions
- •B.1 Notations and Conventions
- •Appendix C: Auxiliary Information About Some Superalgebras
- •C.1.1 The Superalgebra
- •C.2 The Relevant Supercosets and Their Relation
- •C.2.1 Finite Supergroup Elements
- •C.4 An so(6) Inversion Formula
- •Appendix D: MATHEMATICA Package NOVAMANIFOLDA
- •Coset Manifolds (Euclidian Signature)
- •Instructions for the Use
- •Description of the Main Commands of RUNCOSET
- •Structure Constants for CP2
- •Spheres
- •N010 Coset
- •RUNCOSET Package (Euclidian Signature)
- •Main
- •Spin Connection and Curvature Routines
- •Routine Curvapack
- •Routine Curvapackgen
- •Contorsion Routine for Mixed Vielbeins
- •Calculation of the Contorsion for General Manifolds
- •Calculation for Cartan Maurer Equations and Vielbein Differentials (Euclidian Signature)
- •Routine Thoft
- •AdS Space in Four Dimensions (Minkowski Signature)
- •Lie Algebra of SO(2, 3) and Killing Metric
- •Solvable Subalgebra Generating the Coset and Construction of the Vielbein
- •Killing Vectors
- •Trigonometric Coordinates
- •Test of Killing Vectors
- •MANIFOLDPROVA
- •The 4-Dimensional Coset CP2
- •Calculation of the (Pseudo-)Riemannian Geometry of a Kasner Metric in Vielbein Formalism
- •References
- •Index
86 |
4 Cosmology: A Historical Outline from Kant to WMAP and PLANCK |
||||||||
cosmic time t0: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v(t) = |
d |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
d(t) = a(t˙ )r |
|
||||||
|
dt |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
v(t) |
|
a(t˙ ) |
d(t) |
= |
H (t) d(t) |
(4.3.4) |
||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
= a(t) |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
H0 = H (t0)
The Hubble constant actually is not a constant, rather it is a function of the cosmic time and it encodes information about the first derivative of the scale factor, namely about the velocity of the expansion of the Universe. The parameter H0 originally measured by Hubble and determined with increasing precision in subsequent observations is the value at the present time of the Hubble function H (t).
The first who introduced the notion of Big Bang, namely the theory according to which the present Universe evolved by expansion in the course of time starting from an initial state of enormous density, very tiny and extremely hot was Monsegneur Georges Lemaitre, on the basis of the solution of Einstein equations that bears his name together with those of Friedman, Robertson and Walker. He never used the wording Big Bang, rather referred to his own hypothesis as to that of the primeval atom. As far as we know the name Big Bang was invented as a despising joke by Fred Hoyle during a radio interview in 1949. Hoyle, like Einstein did not like expanding universes.
It is almost a historical nemesis that this ironical nickname of a serious but audacious theory became the official scientific name of the standard cosmological model. The idea of the primeval explosion has so much penetrated the common language and has become so popular that when my daughter, now twenty-four of age, started studying history at the elementary school, her textbook started no longer with the Great Flood rather with the Big Bang.
4.4 The Cosmological Principle
The mathematical basis needed to postulate the type of metric which now goes under the name of Friedman, Lemaitre, Robertson and Walker (FLRW), arriving at those conclusions that Einstein so much hated and from which emerges the Big Bang scenario, are provided by the Cosmological Principle.
This latter assumes two properties that are supposed to characterize the structure of space-time on very large scales, namely:
1.Isotropy.
2.Homogeneity.
Isotropy means invariance against rotations, namely in whatever direction it is pointed, our telescope should reveal approximately the same panorama. Homogeneity, on the other hand means invariance against translations. In other words what we
4.4 The Cosmological Principle |
87 |
Fig. 4.13 The hierarchy of cosmic distances. First step in the ladder: 100.000 light years, the Galaxy
see from our own galaxy should be the same landscape observed by any other observer placed in any other galaxy no matter how far from us.
There is no a priori reason to assume the Cosmological Principle and at first sight no empirical basis for it appears to exist, given the granular structure of our universe made of stars grouped into galaxies that are, in turn, grouped into galaxy clusters. Cosmology, however, aims at studying the history of the Universe, analyzing its evolution at so large scales that we can consider galaxies as the point particles of a cosmic dust.
Let us then consider the scale-hierarchy.
Indeed the Universe appears granular only at short distant scales.
•100.000 light-years is the typical dimension of medium size galaxies like our own, the Milky Way. See Fig. 4.13.
•10 millions of light years is the scale of galactic clusters. See Fig. 4.14.
•100 millions of light years is the scale of galactic super clusters. See Fig. 4.15.
•At the scale of one billion of light years, our Universe appears as a homogeneous soup of galaxies and it may be modeled as a perfect fluid. See Fig. 4.16.
The first basis for the Cosmological Principle is this matter of fact evidence on the homogeneous distribution of galactic clusters at very large scales.
Mathematically the Cosmological Principle is enforced by assuming that the space-time metric possesses a set of isometries, namely a set of continuous trans-
88 |
4 Cosmology: A Historical Outline from Kant to WMAP and PLANCK |
Fig. 4.14 The hierarchy of cosmic distances. Second step in the ladder: 10 millions of light years, the Local Group and its neighbors
formations that leave it invariant and form among themselves a Lie group. Isotropy requires that all rotations contained in SO(3) should act as isometries on the cosmological metric. Similarly homogeneity requires that there should be three translational isometries namely as many as the spatial dimensions of the Universe. Imposing such conditions is equivalent to selecting the geometry of constant time sections of space-time. The proper mathematical treatment of isometries is encoded in the theory of coset manifolds and symmetric spaces which is a chapter of Lie algebra and Lie group theory. The geometry of coset manifolds will be summarized in an appropriate mathematical section in next chapter.
At each instant of time the Universe is a three-dimensional space. Assuming the Cosmological Principle means that such a space should admit the maximal possible number of isometries. The mathematical theory of coset manifolds shows that in dimension d = n such maximal number is 12 n(n + 1), namely precisely 6 for d = 3. Furthermore the same mathematical theory shows that there are just only three maximally symmetric manifolds in d = 3. In these spaces the curvature is constant over the manifold and we just have to decide its sign, namely the sign of the constant curvature scalar, positive, negative or null. This choice is encoded in a parameter κ whose possible values are κ = 1, −1, 0, corresponding to the three possibilities we just mentioned. The three maximally symmetric spaces in d = 3 are S3, namely the three-dimensional generalization of the sphere, corresponding to κ = 1, the three-
4.4 The Cosmological Principle |
89 |
Fig. 4.15 The hierarchy of cosmic distances. Third step in the ladder: 100 millions of light years, the galactic superclusters
dimensional analogue H3 of the pseudo-sphere, corresponding to κ = −1, and R3, corresponding to κ = 0, which is the standard three-dimensional Euclidian space.
As we will discuss in great detail later on, having imposed such conditions the four-dimensional line-element which encodes the cosmic gravitational field, takes an extremely simple form which is indeed that of the FLRW metric. Naming t the time coordinate and collectively x the spatial coordinates that label the points of the chosen three-dimensional manifold, we can write:
ds2 = − dt2 + a2(t) dΩκ2(x) |
(4.4.1) |
where dΩκ2(x) denotes the line-element of the three-dimensional maximally symmetric space selected by the value of κ. Substituting the ansatz (4.4.1) in Einstein equations and modeling the matter content of the universe as a perfect fluid one obtains certain differential equations for the scale factor that are named Friedman equations and have radically different solutions for different signs of the scale fac-
90 |
4 Cosmology: A Historical Outline from Kant to WMAP and PLANCK |
Fig. 4.16 The hierarchy of cosmic distances. Fourth step in the ladder: 1 billion of light years: homogeneous distribution of super-clusters
tor. In all cases there is a fast initial expansion, later, however, the expansion velocity decreases and the deceleration is stronger and stronger as the curvature increases.
The case of negative curvature κ = 1 is named the open universe. As we will derive in the sequel from Friedman equations the expansion of the open universe continues indefinitely, yet it slows down until it reaches a linear behavior. When the open universe is very old, the scale factor grows like a(t) ≈ t .
The case κ = 0 is named the flat universe. Also here the expansion is endless, yet, as we will see, it tends asymptotically to a weaker growth than linear. When the flat universe is old, its scale factor grows as: a(t) ≈ t2/3.
The case κ = 1 is named the closed universe. For positive curvature the scale factor growth slows down up to zero velocity in a finite time. After that the expansion reverts into a contraction. The galaxies no longer recede from each other rather they begin to come together and the further apart they are the faster they approach each other. The redshift is turned into a blueshift. The universe becomes progressively smaller and smaller, hotter and hotter. In a finite time the closed universe collapses