- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Classical Physics Between the End of the XIX and the Dawn of the XX Century
- •1.2.1 Maxwell Equations
- •1.2.2 Luminiferous Aether and the Michelson Morley Experiment
- •1.2.3 Maxwell Equations and Lorentz Transformations
- •1.3 The Principle of Special Relativity
- •1.3.1 Minkowski Space
- •1.4 Mathematical Definition of the Lorentz Group
- •1.4.1 The Lorentz Lie Algebra and Its Generators
- •1.4.2 Retrieving Special Lorentz Transformations
- •1.5 Representations of the Lorentz Group
- •1.5.1 The Fundamental Spinor Representation
- •1.6 Lorentz Covariant Field Theories and the Little Group
- •1.8 Criticism of Special Relativity: Opening the Road to General Relativity
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Differentiable Manifolds
- •2.2.1 Homeomorphisms and the Definition of Manifolds
- •2.2.2 Functions on Manifolds
- •2.2.3 Germs of Smooth Functions
- •2.3 Tangent and Cotangent Spaces
- •2.4 Fibre Bundles
- •2.5 Tangent and Cotangent Bundles
- •2.5.1 Sections of a Bundle
- •2.5.2 The Lie Algebra of Vector Fields
- •2.5.3 The Cotangent Bundle and Differential Forms
- •2.5.4 Differential k-Forms
- •2.5.4.1 Exterior Forms
- •2.5.4.2 Exterior Differential Forms
- •2.6 Homotopy, Homology and Cohomology
- •2.6.1 Homotopy
- •2.6.2 Homology
- •2.6.3 Homology and Cohomology Groups: General Construction
- •2.6.4 Relation Between Homotopy and Homology
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 A Historical Outline
- •3.2.1 Gauss Introduces Intrinsic Geometry and Curvilinear Coordinates
- •3.2.3 Parallel Transport and Connections
- •3.2.4 The Metric Connection and Tensor Calculus from Christoffel to Einstein, via Ricci and Levi Civita
- •3.2.5 Mobiles Frames from Frenet and Serret to Cartan
- •3.3 Connections on Principal Bundles: The Mathematical Definition
- •3.3.1 Mathematical Preliminaries on Lie Groups
- •3.3.1.1 Left-/Right-Invariant Vector Fields
- •3.3.1.2 Maurer-Cartan Forms on Lie Group Manifolds
- •3.3.1.3 Maurer Cartan Equations
- •3.3.2 Ehresmann Connections on a Principle Fibre Bundle
- •3.3.2.1 The Connection One-Form
- •Gauge Transformations
- •Horizontal Vector Fields and Covariant Derivatives
- •3.4 Connections on a Vector Bundle
- •3.5 An Illustrative Example of Fibre-Bundle and Connection
- •3.5.1 The Magnetic Monopole and the Hopf Fibration of S3
- •The U(1)-Connection of the Dirac Magnetic Monopole
- •3.6.1 Signatures
- •3.7 The Levi Civita Connection
- •3.7.1 Affine Connections
- •3.7.2 Curvature and Torsion of an Affine Connection
- •Torsion and Torsionless Connections
- •The Levi Civita Metric Connection
- •3.8 Geodesics
- •3.9 Geodesics in Lorentzian and Riemannian Manifolds: Two Simple Examples
- •3.9.1 The Lorentzian Example of dS2
- •3.9.1.1 Null Geodesics
- •3.9.1.2 Time-Like Geodesics
- •3.9.1.3 Space-Like Geodesics
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Keplerian Motions in Newtonian Mechanics
- •4.3 The Orbit Equations of a Massive Particle in Schwarzschild Geometry
- •4.3.1 Extrema of the Effective Potential and Circular Orbits
- •Minimum and Maximum
- •Energy of a Particle in a Circular Orbit
- •4.4 The Periastron Advance of Planets or Stars
- •4.4.1 Perturbative Treatment of the Periastron Advance
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Locally Inertial Frames and the Vielbein Formalism
- •5.2.1 The Vielbein
- •5.2.2 The Spin-Connection
- •5.2.3 The Poincaré Bundle
- •5.3 The Structure of Classical Electrodynamics and Yang-Mills Theories
- •5.3.1 Hodge Duality
- •5.3.2 Geometrical Rewriting of the Gauge Action
- •5.3.3 Yang-Mills Theory in Vielbein Formalism
- •5.4 Soldering of the Lorentz Bundle to the Tangent Bundle
- •5.4.1 Gravitational Coupling of Spinorial Fields
- •5.5 Einstein Field Equations
- •5.6 The Action of Gravity
- •5.6.1 Torsion Equation
- •5.6.1.1 Torsionful Connections
- •The Torsion of Dirac Fields
- •Dilaton Torsion
- •5.6.2 The Einstein Equation
- •5.6.4 Examples of Stress-Energy-Tensors
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of the Yang-Mills Field
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of a Scalar Field
- •5.7 Weak Field Limit of Einstein Equations
- •5.7.1 Gauge Fixing
- •5.7.2 The Spin of the Graviton
- •5.8 The Bottom-Up Approach, or Gravity à la Feynmann
- •5.9 Retrieving the Schwarzschild Metric from Einstein Equations
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction and Historical Outline
- •6.2 The Stress Energy Tensor of a Perfect Fluid
- •6.3 Interior Solutions and the Stellar Equilibrium Equation
- •6.3.1 Integration of the Pressure Equation in the Case of Uniform Density
- •6.3.1.1 Solution in the Newtonian Case
- •6.3.1.2 Integration of the Relativistic Pressure Equation
- •6.3.2 The Central Pressure of a Relativistic Star
- •6.4 The Chandrasekhar Mass-Limit
- •6.4.1.1 Idealized Models of White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars
- •White Dwarfs
- •Neutron Stars
- •6.4.2 The Equilibrium Equation
- •6.4.3 Polytropes and the Chandrasekhar Mass
- •6.5 Conclusive Remarks on Stellar Equilibrium
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.1.1 The Idea of GW Detectors
- •7.1.2 The Arecibo Radio Telescope
- •7.1.2.1 Discovery of the Crab Pulsar
- •7.1.2.2 The 1974 Discovery of the Binary System PSR1913+16
- •7.1.3 The Coalescence of Binaries and the Interferometer Detectors
- •7.2 Green Functions
- •7.2.1 The Laplace Operator and Potential Theory
- •7.2.2 The Relativistic Propagators
- •7.2.2.1 The Retarded Potential
- •7.3 Emission of Gravitational Waves
- •7.3.1 The Stress Energy 3-Form of the Gravitational Field
- •7.3.2 Energy and Momentum of a Plane Gravitational Wave
- •7.3.2.1 Calculation of the Spin Connection
- •7.3.3 Multipolar Expansion of the Perturbation
- •7.3.3.1 Multipolar Expansion
- •7.3.4 Energy Loss by Quadrupole Radiation
- •7.3.4.1 Integration on Solid Angles
- •7.4 Quadruple Radiation from the Binary Pulsar System
- •7.4.1 Keplerian Parameters of a Binary Star System
- •7.4.2 Shrinking of the Orbit and Gravitational Waves
- •7.4.2.1 Calculation of the Moment of Inertia Tensor
- •7.4.3 The Fate of the Binary System
- •7.4.4 The Double Pulsar
- •7.5 Conclusive Remarks on Gravitational Waves
- •References
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Mathematica Packages
- •B.1 Periastropack
- •Programme
- •Main Programme Periastro
- •Subroutine Perihelkep
- •Subroutine Perihelgr
- •Examples
- •B.2 Metrigravpack
- •Metric Gravity
- •Routines: Metrigrav
- •Mainmetric
- •Metricresume
- •Routine Metrigrav
- •Calculation of the Ricci Tensor of the Reissner Nordstrom Metric Using Metrigrav
- •Index
298 |
|
|
7 Gravitational Waves and the Binary Pulsars |
||
so that we conclude with the identifications |
|
|
|||
A = |
G |
; |
Kij = |
∂3Qij |
(7.3.93) |
36π |
∂t3 |
and with the celebrated Einstein formula:
dE = G ∂3Qij 2
dt 45c5 ∂t3
(7.3.94)
expressing the energy radiated per unit time in terms of the square of the third derivative of the quadrupole moment.6
7.4 Quadruple Radiation from the Binary Pulsar System
Having retrieved Einstein 1918 formula for the emission power of quadrupole radiation, we consider now the analysis of a two-body system like that of the binary pulsar PRS1913+16 discovered by Hulse and Taylor (see Fig. 7.12). Our goal is that of computing the variable quadrupole moment of such a system in order to insert the result into the Einstein formula and obtain predictions about the energy loss through gravitational wave emission. Clearly such energy loss will result into a shrinking of the system and of its revolution period. The rate of that shrinking turns out to be a measurable quantity which can be compared with theoretical predictions thus providing very stringent tests on General Relativity. Our discussion follows closely and updates the treatment of the same problem presented in the book [8].
7.4.1 Keplerian Parameters of a Binary Star System
We begin with a Keplerian-Newton description of the orbit which will be corrected by General Relativity effects like the periastron advance.
From the viewpoint of Newtonian mechanics a two-body system can be reduced to a one-body problem in the case of central forces. For a potential:
V (r12) = − |
k |
(7.4.1) |
||
|
|
|||
r12 |
||||
introducing the reduced mass: |
|
|
|
|
μ = |
μ1μ2 |
(7.4.2) |
||
|
|
|||
μ1 + μ2 |
6Note in the final formula (7.3.94) the appearance of the factor c5 in the denominator. The speed of light has been reinstalled at the appropriate power on the basis of dimensional analysis. In the previous steps of the calculation we always used natural units in which c = 1, namely our time variable was actually t ct .
7.4 Quadruple Radiation from the Binary Pulsar System |
299 |
Fig. 7.12 Schema of the binary pulsar system PRS1913+16 discovered by Russell Hulse and Joseph Taylor in 1974. For this discovery they received the Nobel Prize 1993
and naming r = r12, the solution of the dynamical problem is given by the elliptic orbits:
r |
= |
a(1 − e2) |
(7.4.3) |
||
|
|||||
|
1 |
+ |
e cos θ |
|
|
|
|
|
where the geometrical parameters are related to the mechanical integral of motion, namely the energy and the angular momentum by:
a = − |
k |
; |
e2 = 1 + |
2El2 |
(7.4.4) |
2E |
μk2 |
In the case of the Newtonian potential:
|
|
|
|
k = Gμ1μ2 |
|
(7.4.5) |
||||
and therefore |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a |
= − |
μ1μ2G |
; |
e2 |
= |
1 |
+ |
2El2(μ1 + μ2) |
(7.4.6) |
|
2E |
μ13μ23G2 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
Hence if we deduce the geometrical parameters of a binary star system orbit, we can calculate the physical parameters (masses and angular momentum). How do we deduce the geometrical parameters? Help comes from the periastron advance that, in the case of the binary pulsar, can be measured notwithstanding the enormous distance of the system from the Earth (see Fig. 7.13).
300 |
7 Gravitational Waves and the Binary Pulsars |
Fig. 7.13 The periastron advance in the pulsar binary system PSR1913+16
In Chap. 4 we have derived the following perturbative formula for the periastron advance:
Δϕ = 6π |
m |
; |
m = |
GM |
|
|
|||
a(1 − e2) |
c2 |
on the other hand, according to Kepler third law the period is given by:
T |
= |
2π a3/2 |
9 |
μ |
|
k |
|||||
|
|
|
Kepler third law follows from integration of the area derivative
dA |
= |
1 |
2 |
˙ = |
|
→ |
|
= |
T |
= |
|
||
|
|
|
r |
|
A |
|
|
π ab |
|||||
dt |
2 |
2μ |
|
2μ |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
θ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence for a binary star system we can write the two equations:
(7.4.7)
(7.4.8)
(7.4.9)
T = |
2π a |
3/2 |
5 |
|
1 |
|
|
(7.4.10) |
||||
|
|
G(μ1 + μ2) |
||||||||||
Δϕ |
= |
6π |
G(μ1 + μ2) |
1 |
|
|
(7.4.11) |
|||||
|
|
a(1 − e2) |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
c2 |
|
|
and we calculate the angle increase per unit time by dividing through the period:
|
Δϕ |
|
3 |
[G(μ1 + μ2)]3/2 |
|
1 |
(7.4.12) |
|
|
aBS5/2(1 − eBS2 ) |
|||||
|
T |
BS = |
|
c2 |
|