- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Classical Physics Between the End of the XIX and the Dawn of the XX Century
- •1.2.1 Maxwell Equations
- •1.2.2 Luminiferous Aether and the Michelson Morley Experiment
- •1.2.3 Maxwell Equations and Lorentz Transformations
- •1.3 The Principle of Special Relativity
- •1.3.1 Minkowski Space
- •1.4 Mathematical Definition of the Lorentz Group
- •1.4.1 The Lorentz Lie Algebra and Its Generators
- •1.4.2 Retrieving Special Lorentz Transformations
- •1.5 Representations of the Lorentz Group
- •1.5.1 The Fundamental Spinor Representation
- •1.6 Lorentz Covariant Field Theories and the Little Group
- •1.8 Criticism of Special Relativity: Opening the Road to General Relativity
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Differentiable Manifolds
- •2.2.1 Homeomorphisms and the Definition of Manifolds
- •2.2.2 Functions on Manifolds
- •2.2.3 Germs of Smooth Functions
- •2.3 Tangent and Cotangent Spaces
- •2.4 Fibre Bundles
- •2.5 Tangent and Cotangent Bundles
- •2.5.1 Sections of a Bundle
- •2.5.2 The Lie Algebra of Vector Fields
- •2.5.3 The Cotangent Bundle and Differential Forms
- •2.5.4 Differential k-Forms
- •2.5.4.1 Exterior Forms
- •2.5.4.2 Exterior Differential Forms
- •2.6 Homotopy, Homology and Cohomology
- •2.6.1 Homotopy
- •2.6.2 Homology
- •2.6.3 Homology and Cohomology Groups: General Construction
- •2.6.4 Relation Between Homotopy and Homology
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 A Historical Outline
- •3.2.1 Gauss Introduces Intrinsic Geometry and Curvilinear Coordinates
- •3.2.3 Parallel Transport and Connections
- •3.2.4 The Metric Connection and Tensor Calculus from Christoffel to Einstein, via Ricci and Levi Civita
- •3.2.5 Mobiles Frames from Frenet and Serret to Cartan
- •3.3 Connections on Principal Bundles: The Mathematical Definition
- •3.3.1 Mathematical Preliminaries on Lie Groups
- •3.3.1.1 Left-/Right-Invariant Vector Fields
- •3.3.1.2 Maurer-Cartan Forms on Lie Group Manifolds
- •3.3.1.3 Maurer Cartan Equations
- •3.3.2 Ehresmann Connections on a Principle Fibre Bundle
- •3.3.2.1 The Connection One-Form
- •Gauge Transformations
- •Horizontal Vector Fields and Covariant Derivatives
- •3.4 Connections on a Vector Bundle
- •3.5 An Illustrative Example of Fibre-Bundle and Connection
- •3.5.1 The Magnetic Monopole and the Hopf Fibration of S3
- •The U(1)-Connection of the Dirac Magnetic Monopole
- •3.6.1 Signatures
- •3.7 The Levi Civita Connection
- •3.7.1 Affine Connections
- •3.7.2 Curvature and Torsion of an Affine Connection
- •Torsion and Torsionless Connections
- •The Levi Civita Metric Connection
- •3.8 Geodesics
- •3.9 Geodesics in Lorentzian and Riemannian Manifolds: Two Simple Examples
- •3.9.1 The Lorentzian Example of dS2
- •3.9.1.1 Null Geodesics
- •3.9.1.2 Time-Like Geodesics
- •3.9.1.3 Space-Like Geodesics
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Keplerian Motions in Newtonian Mechanics
- •4.3 The Orbit Equations of a Massive Particle in Schwarzschild Geometry
- •4.3.1 Extrema of the Effective Potential and Circular Orbits
- •Minimum and Maximum
- •Energy of a Particle in a Circular Orbit
- •4.4 The Periastron Advance of Planets or Stars
- •4.4.1 Perturbative Treatment of the Periastron Advance
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Locally Inertial Frames and the Vielbein Formalism
- •5.2.1 The Vielbein
- •5.2.2 The Spin-Connection
- •5.2.3 The Poincaré Bundle
- •5.3 The Structure of Classical Electrodynamics and Yang-Mills Theories
- •5.3.1 Hodge Duality
- •5.3.2 Geometrical Rewriting of the Gauge Action
- •5.3.3 Yang-Mills Theory in Vielbein Formalism
- •5.4 Soldering of the Lorentz Bundle to the Tangent Bundle
- •5.4.1 Gravitational Coupling of Spinorial Fields
- •5.5 Einstein Field Equations
- •5.6 The Action of Gravity
- •5.6.1 Torsion Equation
- •5.6.1.1 Torsionful Connections
- •The Torsion of Dirac Fields
- •Dilaton Torsion
- •5.6.2 The Einstein Equation
- •5.6.4 Examples of Stress-Energy-Tensors
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of the Yang-Mills Field
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of a Scalar Field
- •5.7 Weak Field Limit of Einstein Equations
- •5.7.1 Gauge Fixing
- •5.7.2 The Spin of the Graviton
- •5.8 The Bottom-Up Approach, or Gravity à la Feynmann
- •5.9 Retrieving the Schwarzschild Metric from Einstein Equations
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction and Historical Outline
- •6.2 The Stress Energy Tensor of a Perfect Fluid
- •6.3 Interior Solutions and the Stellar Equilibrium Equation
- •6.3.1 Integration of the Pressure Equation in the Case of Uniform Density
- •6.3.1.1 Solution in the Newtonian Case
- •6.3.1.2 Integration of the Relativistic Pressure Equation
- •6.3.2 The Central Pressure of a Relativistic Star
- •6.4 The Chandrasekhar Mass-Limit
- •6.4.1.1 Idealized Models of White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars
- •White Dwarfs
- •Neutron Stars
- •6.4.2 The Equilibrium Equation
- •6.4.3 Polytropes and the Chandrasekhar Mass
- •6.5 Conclusive Remarks on Stellar Equilibrium
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.1.1 The Idea of GW Detectors
- •7.1.2 The Arecibo Radio Telescope
- •7.1.2.1 Discovery of the Crab Pulsar
- •7.1.2.2 The 1974 Discovery of the Binary System PSR1913+16
- •7.1.3 The Coalescence of Binaries and the Interferometer Detectors
- •7.2 Green Functions
- •7.2.1 The Laplace Operator and Potential Theory
- •7.2.2 The Relativistic Propagators
- •7.2.2.1 The Retarded Potential
- •7.3 Emission of Gravitational Waves
- •7.3.1 The Stress Energy 3-Form of the Gravitational Field
- •7.3.2 Energy and Momentum of a Plane Gravitational Wave
- •7.3.2.1 Calculation of the Spin Connection
- •7.3.3 Multipolar Expansion of the Perturbation
- •7.3.3.1 Multipolar Expansion
- •7.3.4 Energy Loss by Quadrupole Radiation
- •7.3.4.1 Integration on Solid Angles
- •7.4 Quadruple Radiation from the Binary Pulsar System
- •7.4.1 Keplerian Parameters of a Binary Star System
- •7.4.2 Shrinking of the Orbit and Gravitational Waves
- •7.4.2.1 Calculation of the Moment of Inertia Tensor
- •7.4.3 The Fate of the Binary System
- •7.4.4 The Double Pulsar
- •7.5 Conclusive Remarks on Gravitational Waves
- •References
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Mathematica Packages
- •B.1 Periastropack
- •Programme
- •Main Programme Periastro
- •Subroutine Perihelkep
- •Subroutine Perihelgr
- •Examples
- •B.2 Metrigravpack
- •Metric Gravity
- •Routines: Metrigrav
- •Mainmetric
- •Metricresume
- •Routine Metrigrav
- •Calculation of the Ricci Tensor of the Reissner Nordstrom Metric Using Metrigrav
- •Index
5.5 Einstein Field Equations |
209 |
5.5 Einstein Field Equations
In approaching the issue of Einstein field equations we follow two alternative paths. First we discuss Bianchi identities which played a fundamental role in electrodynamics and have a similar fundamental relevance in gravity, as well. Then we construct a geometrical action motivating its uniqueness and from that action we derive the field equations. Secondly, following an inverse procedure, we provide the physical arguments that lead to an essentially unique form of the linearized field equations and we argue why and how they should be non-linearly extended. The iterative procedure, known under the name of Noether coupling, which reconstructs the full non-linear structure of the geometrical theory will be outlined.
Our starting point is provided by the definition of the Poincaré curvatures split into the Torsion and the Lorentz curvature two-form, respectively. Summarizing we write:
Ta = D Ea ≡ dEa − ωab Ecηbc |
(5.5.1) |
|
Rab = dωab − ωac ωdbηcd |
(5.5.2) |
|
These two definitions imply the following Bianchi identities: |
|
|
0 |
= D Ta + Rab Ecηbc |
(5.5.3) |
0 |
= D Rab |
(5.5.4) |
from which we can deduce very important consequences in case we assume the soldering condition Ta = 0. Let us begin by expanding the curvature two form Rab along the vielbein basis, which introduces the notion of Riemann tensor:
Rab = Rabcd Ec Ed |
(5.5.5) |
From the point of view of representation theory of the Lorentz group SO(1, m − 1), m being the number space-time dimension, the tensor Rabcd is not irreducible, rather it is the tensor product of two irreducible rank two antisymmetric represen-
tations, denoted , in the language of Young tableaux. A priori the total number of independent components is 14 m2(m − 1)2 and the decomposition into irreducible representations is as follows:
= |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
|
• |
|
|
|
|
(5.5.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
5 Einstein Versus Yang-Mills Field Equations |
In the first line of (5.5.6) we just listed the available symmetries of the four-index tensors appearing in the decomposition. These are not yet irreducible, since for the pseudo-orthogonal group we can still construct invariants by taking traces with the invariant metric ηab . In the second line we enumerated the complete list of irreducible representations, the hat over a young tableau meaning that the corresponding tensor is irreducible, since it has been made traceless. In this way the total number of irreducible representations contained in Rabcd turns out to be six. However, inserting the soldering condition Ta = 0 into the Bianchi identity (5.5.3) we obtain:
0 = Rabcd Ec Ed Ef ηbf |
(5.5.7) |
This simply implies that any irreducible tensor contained in Rabcd that has at least three antisymmetric indices should vanish. In other words, the algebraic Bianchi identity (5.5.7) translates into the statement:
0 = |
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
(5.5.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
= |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Taking this into account, the Riemann tensor of a Riemannian torsionless manifold decomposes into the following three irreducible representations of the Lorentz group SO(1, m − 1):
R |
ab |
= |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
(5.5.9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
cd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
W ab |
|
Ricab |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
R |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
cd |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where Wcdab is named the Weyl tensor, Ric8 ab is the symmetric traceless Ricci tensor and R is the scalar curvature. Explicitly we can write:
Rab |
|
W ab |
|
2 |
δ[a |
ηb]f Ric |
2 |
δabR |
(5.5.10) |
= |
+ m − 1 |
|
|||||||
cd |
cd |
[c |
8 d]f + m(m − 1) cd |
|
where the normalization factors are chosen in such a way that by taking a contraction of the original Riemann tensor, for instance contracting a ↔ c, we obtain:
1 |
|
|
|
R b d = Ric8 df ηbf + |
|
δdbR |
(5.5.11) |
m |
|||
and taking a double contraction we have: |
|
||
R = R |
(5.5.12) |
Instead of the traceless Ricci tensor it is customary to use in General Relativity the full Ricci tensor defined as follows:
1 |
|
|
|
ηbf R b d ≡ Ricdf = Ric8 df + |
|
ηdf R |
(5.5.13) |
m |