- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Classical Physics Between the End of the XIX and the Dawn of the XX Century
- •1.2.1 Maxwell Equations
- •1.2.2 Luminiferous Aether and the Michelson Morley Experiment
- •1.2.3 Maxwell Equations and Lorentz Transformations
- •1.3 The Principle of Special Relativity
- •1.3.1 Minkowski Space
- •1.4 Mathematical Definition of the Lorentz Group
- •1.4.1 The Lorentz Lie Algebra and Its Generators
- •1.4.2 Retrieving Special Lorentz Transformations
- •1.5 Representations of the Lorentz Group
- •1.5.1 The Fundamental Spinor Representation
- •1.6 Lorentz Covariant Field Theories and the Little Group
- •1.8 Criticism of Special Relativity: Opening the Road to General Relativity
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Differentiable Manifolds
- •2.2.1 Homeomorphisms and the Definition of Manifolds
- •2.2.2 Functions on Manifolds
- •2.2.3 Germs of Smooth Functions
- •2.3 Tangent and Cotangent Spaces
- •2.4 Fibre Bundles
- •2.5 Tangent and Cotangent Bundles
- •2.5.1 Sections of a Bundle
- •2.5.2 The Lie Algebra of Vector Fields
- •2.5.3 The Cotangent Bundle and Differential Forms
- •2.5.4 Differential k-Forms
- •2.5.4.1 Exterior Forms
- •2.5.4.2 Exterior Differential Forms
- •2.6 Homotopy, Homology and Cohomology
- •2.6.1 Homotopy
- •2.6.2 Homology
- •2.6.3 Homology and Cohomology Groups: General Construction
- •2.6.4 Relation Between Homotopy and Homology
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 A Historical Outline
- •3.2.1 Gauss Introduces Intrinsic Geometry and Curvilinear Coordinates
- •3.2.3 Parallel Transport and Connections
- •3.2.4 The Metric Connection and Tensor Calculus from Christoffel to Einstein, via Ricci and Levi Civita
- •3.2.5 Mobiles Frames from Frenet and Serret to Cartan
- •3.3 Connections on Principal Bundles: The Mathematical Definition
- •3.3.1 Mathematical Preliminaries on Lie Groups
- •3.3.1.1 Left-/Right-Invariant Vector Fields
- •3.3.1.2 Maurer-Cartan Forms on Lie Group Manifolds
- •3.3.1.3 Maurer Cartan Equations
- •3.3.2 Ehresmann Connections on a Principle Fibre Bundle
- •3.3.2.1 The Connection One-Form
- •Gauge Transformations
- •Horizontal Vector Fields and Covariant Derivatives
- •3.4 Connections on a Vector Bundle
- •3.5 An Illustrative Example of Fibre-Bundle and Connection
- •3.5.1 The Magnetic Monopole and the Hopf Fibration of S3
- •The U(1)-Connection of the Dirac Magnetic Monopole
- •3.6.1 Signatures
- •3.7 The Levi Civita Connection
- •3.7.1 Affine Connections
- •3.7.2 Curvature and Torsion of an Affine Connection
- •Torsion and Torsionless Connections
- •The Levi Civita Metric Connection
- •3.8 Geodesics
- •3.9 Geodesics in Lorentzian and Riemannian Manifolds: Two Simple Examples
- •3.9.1 The Lorentzian Example of dS2
- •3.9.1.1 Null Geodesics
- •3.9.1.2 Time-Like Geodesics
- •3.9.1.3 Space-Like Geodesics
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Keplerian Motions in Newtonian Mechanics
- •4.3 The Orbit Equations of a Massive Particle in Schwarzschild Geometry
- •4.3.1 Extrema of the Effective Potential and Circular Orbits
- •Minimum and Maximum
- •Energy of a Particle in a Circular Orbit
- •4.4 The Periastron Advance of Planets or Stars
- •4.4.1 Perturbative Treatment of the Periastron Advance
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Locally Inertial Frames and the Vielbein Formalism
- •5.2.1 The Vielbein
- •5.2.2 The Spin-Connection
- •5.2.3 The Poincaré Bundle
- •5.3 The Structure of Classical Electrodynamics and Yang-Mills Theories
- •5.3.1 Hodge Duality
- •5.3.2 Geometrical Rewriting of the Gauge Action
- •5.3.3 Yang-Mills Theory in Vielbein Formalism
- •5.4 Soldering of the Lorentz Bundle to the Tangent Bundle
- •5.4.1 Gravitational Coupling of Spinorial Fields
- •5.5 Einstein Field Equations
- •5.6 The Action of Gravity
- •5.6.1 Torsion Equation
- •5.6.1.1 Torsionful Connections
- •The Torsion of Dirac Fields
- •Dilaton Torsion
- •5.6.2 The Einstein Equation
- •5.6.4 Examples of Stress-Energy-Tensors
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of the Yang-Mills Field
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of a Scalar Field
- •5.7 Weak Field Limit of Einstein Equations
- •5.7.1 Gauge Fixing
- •5.7.2 The Spin of the Graviton
- •5.8 The Bottom-Up Approach, or Gravity à la Feynmann
- •5.9 Retrieving the Schwarzschild Metric from Einstein Equations
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction and Historical Outline
- •6.2 The Stress Energy Tensor of a Perfect Fluid
- •6.3 Interior Solutions and the Stellar Equilibrium Equation
- •6.3.1 Integration of the Pressure Equation in the Case of Uniform Density
- •6.3.1.1 Solution in the Newtonian Case
- •6.3.1.2 Integration of the Relativistic Pressure Equation
- •6.3.2 The Central Pressure of a Relativistic Star
- •6.4 The Chandrasekhar Mass-Limit
- •6.4.1.1 Idealized Models of White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars
- •White Dwarfs
- •Neutron Stars
- •6.4.2 The Equilibrium Equation
- •6.4.3 Polytropes and the Chandrasekhar Mass
- •6.5 Conclusive Remarks on Stellar Equilibrium
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.1.1 The Idea of GW Detectors
- •7.1.2 The Arecibo Radio Telescope
- •7.1.2.1 Discovery of the Crab Pulsar
- •7.1.2.2 The 1974 Discovery of the Binary System PSR1913+16
- •7.1.3 The Coalescence of Binaries and the Interferometer Detectors
- •7.2 Green Functions
- •7.2.1 The Laplace Operator and Potential Theory
- •7.2.2 The Relativistic Propagators
- •7.2.2.1 The Retarded Potential
- •7.3 Emission of Gravitational Waves
- •7.3.1 The Stress Energy 3-Form of the Gravitational Field
- •7.3.2 Energy and Momentum of a Plane Gravitational Wave
- •7.3.2.1 Calculation of the Spin Connection
- •7.3.3 Multipolar Expansion of the Perturbation
- •7.3.3.1 Multipolar Expansion
- •7.3.4 Energy Loss by Quadrupole Radiation
- •7.3.4.1 Integration on Solid Angles
- •7.4 Quadruple Radiation from the Binary Pulsar System
- •7.4.1 Keplerian Parameters of a Binary Star System
- •7.4.2 Shrinking of the Orbit and Gravitational Waves
- •7.4.2.1 Calculation of the Moment of Inertia Tensor
- •7.4.3 The Fate of the Binary System
- •7.4.4 The Double Pulsar
- •7.5 Conclusive Remarks on Gravitational Waves
- •References
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Mathematica Packages
- •B.1 Periastropack
- •Programme
- •Main Programme Periastro
- •Subroutine Perihelkep
- •Subroutine Perihelgr
- •Examples
- •B.2 Metrigravpack
- •Metric Gravity
- •Routines: Metrigrav
- •Mainmetric
- •Metricresume
- •Routine Metrigrav
- •Calculation of the Ricci Tensor of the Reissner Nordstrom Metric Using Metrigrav
- •Index
66 |
2 Manifolds and Fibre Bundles |
and in particular the 2-form of (2.5.39) will be identified with the exterior differential of the 1-form ω(1), namely ω(2) = dω(1). In simple words the exterior differential operator d is the generalization on any manifold and to differential forms of any degree of the concept of curl, familiar from ordinary tensor calculus in R3. Forms whose exterior differential vanishes will be named closed forms. All these concepts need appropriate explanations that will be provided shortly from now. Yet, already at this intuitive level, we can formulate the next basic question. We saw that, in order to be the total differential of a function, a 1-form must be necessarily closed. Is such a condition also sufficient? In other words are all closed forms the differential of something? Locally the correct answer is yes, but globally it may be no. Indeed in any open neighborhood a closed form can be represented as the differential of another differential form, but the forms that do the job in the various open patches may not glue together nicely into a globally defined one. This problem and its solution constitute an important chapter of geometry, named cohomology. Actually cohomology is a central issue in algebraic topology, the art of characterizing the topological properties of manifolds through appropriate algebraic structures.
2.5.4 Differential k-Forms
Next we introduce differential forms of degree k and the exterior differential d. In a later section, after the discussion of homology we show how this relates to the important construction of cohomology. For the time being our approach is simpler and down to earth.
We have seen that the 1-forms at a point p M of a manifold are linear functionals on the tangent space Tp M . First of all we discuss the construction of exterior k-forms on any vector space W defined to be the kth linear antisymmetric functionals on such a space.
2.5.4.1 Exterior Forms
Let W a vector space of finite dimension over the field F (F can either be R or C depending on the case). In this section we show how we can construct a sequence of vector spaces Λk (W ) with k = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n = dim W defined in the following way:
Λ0(W ) = F
Λ1(W ) = W
(2.5.41)
.
.
.
Λk (W ) = vector space of k-linear antisymmetric functionals over W
2.5 Tangent and Cotangent Bundles |
67 |
The spaces Λk (W ) contain the linear functionals on the kth exterior powers of the
vector space W . Such functionals are denoted exterior forms of degree k on W . Let φ(k) Λk (W ) be a k-form. It describes a map:
φ(k) : W W · · · W → F |
|
(2.5.42) |
with the following properties: |
|
|
(i) φ(k)(w1, w2, . . . , wi , . . . , wj , . . . , wk ) |
|
|
= −φ(k)(w1, w2, . . . , wj , . . . , wi , . . . , wk ) |
|
(2.5.43) |
(ii) φ(k)(w1, w2, . . . , αx + βy, . . . , wk ) |
|
|
= αφ(k)(w1, w2, . . . , x, . . . , wk ) + βφ(k)(w1, w2, . . . , y, . . . , wk ) |
||
where α, β F and wi , x, y W . |
(k) |
is antisymmetric in |
The first of properties (2.5.43) guarantees that the map φ |
|
any two arguments. The second property states that φ(k) is linear in each argument. The sequence of vector spaces Λk (W ) :
n |
|
Λ(W ) ≡ ! Λk (W ) |
(2.5.44) |
k=0 |
|
can be equipped with an additional operation, named exterior product that to each pair of a k1 and a k2 form (φ(k1), φ(k2)) associates a new (k1 + k2)-form. Namely
we have:
|
|
|
|
: Λk1 Λk2 → Λk1+k2 |
|
(2.5.45) |
|||||
More precisely we set: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
φ(k1) φ(k2) Λk1+k2 (W ) |
|
(2.5.46) |
|||||
and we write: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
φ(k1) |
|
φ(k2)(w1 |
, w2 |
, . . . , wk1 |
+ |
k2 ) |
( )δP |
1 |
φ(k1)(wP (1), . . . , wP (k)) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
= P |
− |
(k1 + k2)! |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
× φ(k2)(wP (k1+1), . . . , wP (k1+k2)) |
(2.5.47) |
where P are the permutations of k1 + k2 objects, namely the elements of the symmetric group Sk1+k2 and δP is the parity of the permutation P (δP = 0 if P contains an even number of exchanges with respect to the identity permutation, while δP = 1 if such a number is odd).
In order to make this definition clear, consider the explicit example where k1 = 2
and k2 = 1. We have: |
|
φ(2) φ(1) = φ(3) |
(2.5.48) |
68 |
2 Manifolds and Fibre Bundles |
and we find
φ(3)(w1, w2, w3) = 1! φ(2)(w1, w2)φ(1)(w3) − φ(2)(w2, w1)φ(1)(w3)
3
− φ(2)(w1, w3)φ(1)(w2) − φ(2)(w31, w2)φ(1)(w1)
+φ(2)(w2, w3)φ(1)(w1) + φ(2)(w3, w1)φ(1)(w2)
=1 φ(2)(w1, w2)φ(1)(w3) + φ(2)(w2, w3)φ(1)(w1)
3
+ φ(2)(w3, w1)φ(1)(w2) |
(2.5.49) |
The exterior product we have just defined has the following formal property:
φ(k) φk = (−)kk φk φk |
φ(k) Λk (W ); φk Λk (W ) |
(2.5.50) |
which can be immediately verified starting from Definition (2.5.47). Indeed, assuming for instance that k2 > k1, it is sufficient to consider the parity of the permutation:
Π |
= |
1, 2, |
. . . , |
k1, |
|
k1 + 1, . . . , |
k2, |
|
k2 + 1, . . . , k1 + k2 |
|||||
|
k1, k1 |
+ |
2, . . . , k1 |
+ |
k1 |
, |
2k1 |
+ |
1, . . . , k1 |
+ |
k2 |
, |
1, . . . , k1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.5.51) |
which is immediately seen to be: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
δΠ = k1k2 mod 2 |
|
|
|
(2.5.52) |
Setting P = P Π (which implies δP = δP + δΠ ) we obtain:
φ(k2) φ(k1)(w1, . . . , wk1+k2 ) = (−)δP φ(k2)(wP (1), . . . , wP (k2))
P
×φ(k1)(wP (k2+1), . . . , wP (k1+k2))
=(−)δP +δΠ φ(k2)(wP Π (1), . . . , wP Π (k2))
P
× φ(k1)(wP Π (k2+1), . . . , wP Π (k2+k1))
= (−)δΠ (−)δP i φ(k2)(wP (k1+1), . . . , wP (k1+k2))
×φ(k1)(wP (1), . . . , wP (k1))
= (−)δΠ φ(k1) φ(k2)(w1, . . . , wk1+k2 ) |
(2.5.53) |
2.5.4.2 Exterior Differential Forms
It follows that on Tp M we can construct not only the 1-forms but also all the higher degree k-forms. They span the vector space Λk (Tp M ). By gluing together all such
2.5 Tangent and Cotangent Bundles |
69 |
vector spaces, as we did in the case of 1-forms, we obtain the vector-bundles of k-forms. More explicitly we can set:
Definition 2.5.4 A differential k-form ω(k) is a smooth assignment:
ω(k) : p → ωp(k) Λk (Tp M ) |
(2.5.54) |
of an exterior k-form on the tangent space at p for each point p M of a manifold.
Let now (U, ϕ) be a local chart and let {dxp1 , . . . , dxpm} be the usual natural basis of the cotangent space Tp M . Then in the same local chart the differential form ω(k) is written as:
ω(k) = ωi1,...,ik (x1, . . . , xm) dxi1 · · · dxik |
(2.5.55) |
where ωi1,...,ik (x1, . . . , xm) C∞(U ) are smooth functions on the open neighborhood U , completely antisymmetric in the indices i1, . . . , ik .
At this point it is obvious that the operation of exterior product, defined on exte-
rior forms, can be extended to exterior differential forms. In particular, if ω(k) and ω(k ) are a k-form and a k -form, respectively, then ω(k) ω(k ) is a (k + k )-form.
As a consequence of (2.5.50) we have:
|
|
|
|
ω(k) ω(k ) = (−)kk ω(k ) ω(k) |
|
|
(2.5.56) |
|||
and in local coordinates we find: |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
(k) |
ω |
(k ) |
(k) |
(k) |
1 |
· · · dx |
k |
+ |
k |
ω |
|
|
= ω[i1...ik |
(x1, . . . , xm)ωik+1...ik+k ] dx |
|
|
(2.5.57) |
where [. . . ] denotes the complete antisymmetrization on the indices.
Let A0(M ) = C∞(M ) and let Ak (M ) = C∞(M ) be the C∞(M )-module of differential k-forms. To justify the naming module, observe that we can construct the product of a smooth function f C∞(M ) with a differential form ω(k) setting:
f ω(k) (Z1, . . . , Zk ) = f · ω(k)(Z1, . . . , Zk ) (2.5.58)
for each k-tuplet of vector fields Z1, . . . , Zk Γ (T M , M ) Furthermore let
m |
|
A (M ) = * Ak (M ) where m = dim M |
(2.5.59) |
k=0 |
|
Then A is an algebra over C∞(M ) with respect to the exterior wedge product +. To introduce the exterior differential d we proceed as follows. Let f C∞(M ) be a smooth function: for each vector field Z Diff(M ), we have Z(f ) C∞(M ) and therefore there is a unique differential 1-form, noted df such that df (Z) =