- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Classical Physics Between the End of the XIX and the Dawn of the XX Century
- •1.2.1 Maxwell Equations
- •1.2.2 Luminiferous Aether and the Michelson Morley Experiment
- •1.2.3 Maxwell Equations and Lorentz Transformations
- •1.3 The Principle of Special Relativity
- •1.3.1 Minkowski Space
- •1.4 Mathematical Definition of the Lorentz Group
- •1.4.1 The Lorentz Lie Algebra and Its Generators
- •1.4.2 Retrieving Special Lorentz Transformations
- •1.5 Representations of the Lorentz Group
- •1.5.1 The Fundamental Spinor Representation
- •1.6 Lorentz Covariant Field Theories and the Little Group
- •1.8 Criticism of Special Relativity: Opening the Road to General Relativity
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Differentiable Manifolds
- •2.2.1 Homeomorphisms and the Definition of Manifolds
- •2.2.2 Functions on Manifolds
- •2.2.3 Germs of Smooth Functions
- •2.3 Tangent and Cotangent Spaces
- •2.4 Fibre Bundles
- •2.5 Tangent and Cotangent Bundles
- •2.5.1 Sections of a Bundle
- •2.5.2 The Lie Algebra of Vector Fields
- •2.5.3 The Cotangent Bundle and Differential Forms
- •2.5.4 Differential k-Forms
- •2.5.4.1 Exterior Forms
- •2.5.4.2 Exterior Differential Forms
- •2.6 Homotopy, Homology and Cohomology
- •2.6.1 Homotopy
- •2.6.2 Homology
- •2.6.3 Homology and Cohomology Groups: General Construction
- •2.6.4 Relation Between Homotopy and Homology
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 A Historical Outline
- •3.2.1 Gauss Introduces Intrinsic Geometry and Curvilinear Coordinates
- •3.2.3 Parallel Transport and Connections
- •3.2.4 The Metric Connection and Tensor Calculus from Christoffel to Einstein, via Ricci and Levi Civita
- •3.2.5 Mobiles Frames from Frenet and Serret to Cartan
- •3.3 Connections on Principal Bundles: The Mathematical Definition
- •3.3.1 Mathematical Preliminaries on Lie Groups
- •3.3.1.1 Left-/Right-Invariant Vector Fields
- •3.3.1.2 Maurer-Cartan Forms on Lie Group Manifolds
- •3.3.1.3 Maurer Cartan Equations
- •3.3.2 Ehresmann Connections on a Principle Fibre Bundle
- •3.3.2.1 The Connection One-Form
- •Gauge Transformations
- •Horizontal Vector Fields and Covariant Derivatives
- •3.4 Connections on a Vector Bundle
- •3.5 An Illustrative Example of Fibre-Bundle and Connection
- •3.5.1 The Magnetic Monopole and the Hopf Fibration of S3
- •The U(1)-Connection of the Dirac Magnetic Monopole
- •3.6.1 Signatures
- •3.7 The Levi Civita Connection
- •3.7.1 Affine Connections
- •3.7.2 Curvature and Torsion of an Affine Connection
- •Torsion and Torsionless Connections
- •The Levi Civita Metric Connection
- •3.8 Geodesics
- •3.9 Geodesics in Lorentzian and Riemannian Manifolds: Two Simple Examples
- •3.9.1 The Lorentzian Example of dS2
- •3.9.1.1 Null Geodesics
- •3.9.1.2 Time-Like Geodesics
- •3.9.1.3 Space-Like Geodesics
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Keplerian Motions in Newtonian Mechanics
- •4.3 The Orbit Equations of a Massive Particle in Schwarzschild Geometry
- •4.3.1 Extrema of the Effective Potential and Circular Orbits
- •Minimum and Maximum
- •Energy of a Particle in a Circular Orbit
- •4.4 The Periastron Advance of Planets or Stars
- •4.4.1 Perturbative Treatment of the Periastron Advance
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Locally Inertial Frames and the Vielbein Formalism
- •5.2.1 The Vielbein
- •5.2.2 The Spin-Connection
- •5.2.3 The Poincaré Bundle
- •5.3 The Structure of Classical Electrodynamics and Yang-Mills Theories
- •5.3.1 Hodge Duality
- •5.3.2 Geometrical Rewriting of the Gauge Action
- •5.3.3 Yang-Mills Theory in Vielbein Formalism
- •5.4 Soldering of the Lorentz Bundle to the Tangent Bundle
- •5.4.1 Gravitational Coupling of Spinorial Fields
- •5.5 Einstein Field Equations
- •5.6 The Action of Gravity
- •5.6.1 Torsion Equation
- •5.6.1.1 Torsionful Connections
- •The Torsion of Dirac Fields
- •Dilaton Torsion
- •5.6.2 The Einstein Equation
- •5.6.4 Examples of Stress-Energy-Tensors
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of the Yang-Mills Field
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of a Scalar Field
- •5.7 Weak Field Limit of Einstein Equations
- •5.7.1 Gauge Fixing
- •5.7.2 The Spin of the Graviton
- •5.8 The Bottom-Up Approach, or Gravity à la Feynmann
- •5.9 Retrieving the Schwarzschild Metric from Einstein Equations
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction and Historical Outline
- •6.2 The Stress Energy Tensor of a Perfect Fluid
- •6.3 Interior Solutions and the Stellar Equilibrium Equation
- •6.3.1 Integration of the Pressure Equation in the Case of Uniform Density
- •6.3.1.1 Solution in the Newtonian Case
- •6.3.1.2 Integration of the Relativistic Pressure Equation
- •6.3.2 The Central Pressure of a Relativistic Star
- •6.4 The Chandrasekhar Mass-Limit
- •6.4.1.1 Idealized Models of White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars
- •White Dwarfs
- •Neutron Stars
- •6.4.2 The Equilibrium Equation
- •6.4.3 Polytropes and the Chandrasekhar Mass
- •6.5 Conclusive Remarks on Stellar Equilibrium
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.1.1 The Idea of GW Detectors
- •7.1.2 The Arecibo Radio Telescope
- •7.1.2.1 Discovery of the Crab Pulsar
- •7.1.2.2 The 1974 Discovery of the Binary System PSR1913+16
- •7.1.3 The Coalescence of Binaries and the Interferometer Detectors
- •7.2 Green Functions
- •7.2.1 The Laplace Operator and Potential Theory
- •7.2.2 The Relativistic Propagators
- •7.2.2.1 The Retarded Potential
- •7.3 Emission of Gravitational Waves
- •7.3.1 The Stress Energy 3-Form of the Gravitational Field
- •7.3.2 Energy and Momentum of a Plane Gravitational Wave
- •7.3.2.1 Calculation of the Spin Connection
- •7.3.3 Multipolar Expansion of the Perturbation
- •7.3.3.1 Multipolar Expansion
- •7.3.4 Energy Loss by Quadrupole Radiation
- •7.3.4.1 Integration on Solid Angles
- •7.4 Quadruple Radiation from the Binary Pulsar System
- •7.4.1 Keplerian Parameters of a Binary Star System
- •7.4.2 Shrinking of the Orbit and Gravitational Waves
- •7.4.2.1 Calculation of the Moment of Inertia Tensor
- •7.4.3 The Fate of the Binary System
- •7.4.4 The Double Pulsar
- •7.5 Conclusive Remarks on Gravitational Waves
- •References
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Mathematica Packages
- •B.1 Periastropack
- •Programme
- •Main Programme Periastro
- •Subroutine Perihelkep
- •Subroutine Perihelgr
- •Examples
- •B.2 Metrigravpack
- •Metric Gravity
- •Routines: Metrigrav
- •Mainmetric
- •Metricresume
- •Routine Metrigrav
- •Calculation of the Ricci Tensor of the Reissner Nordstrom Metric Using Metrigrav
- •Index
Chapter 7
Gravitational Waves and the Binary Pulsars
Like as the waves make towards the pebbled shore,
So do our minutes hasten to their end;
Each changing place with that which goes before,
In sequent toil all forwards do contend.
William Shakespeare
7.1 Introduction
The concept of gravitational waves was born in 1918 with a paper published by Einstein under the following title Über Gravitationswelle [1]. For the first time, the effect of gravitational waves was calculated in that article in which there appeared a formula evaluating the power of a gravitational antenna:
Power |
% |
% |
(7.1.1) |
%Q %2 |
According to Einstein, the energy radiated away per unit time is proportional to the squared modulus of the third time-derivative of the quadrupole moment of the emitting source. Just as electromagnetic waves are produced by accelerated charges, in the same way gravitational waves should be produced by accelerated masses or lumps of energy. There is however a crucial difference, due to the different spin of the fundamental field mediating the interaction. Electromagnetism is mediated by a vector field, that has spin s = 1, while gravitational interactions are transmitted by a symmetric tensor, whose spin is s = 2. Consequently electromagnetic radiation can be produced by a variable electric dipole, while in order to emit gravitational radiation one needs at least a variable quadrupole moment. Einstein was forced to write his 1918 paper in order to correct a serious error he had discovered in his 1916 paper [2], where he had developed the linear approximation scheme to solve the field equations of his theory. In that context he had noticed the existence of plane wave solutions similar to the corresponding wave solutions of Maxwell equations, yet he had overlooked the crucial question of what are the first contributing multipoles, in modern parlance he had overlooked the issue of spin.
P.G. Frè, Gravity, a Geometrical Course, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5361-7_7, |
273 |
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 |
|
274 |
7 Gravitational Waves and the Binary Pulsars |
It was clear to Einstein that, due to their extreme weakness,1 of the order of (v/c)5, there was no hope of detecting gravitational waves in Earth-based laboratories; after some years he reconsidered the whole matter coming to the conclusion that gravitational waves actually do not exist, being simply gauge artifacts. In 1936, together with Nathan Rosen,2 Einstein wrote a paper containing such a conclusion and sent it for publication to the Physical Review. The article was rejected. Quite angrily Einstein withdrew the manuscript and published it on the Journal of the Franklin Institute with a less provoking title [3].
In the following years Einstein reconsidered once again the matter and, together with Infeld and Hoffmann, developed a systematic post-Newtonian expansion of the field equations of General Relativity, showing that wave radiation does not appear up to the (v/c)4 order. Yet at the next order, (v/c)5, waves pop up and follow the quadrupole formula (7.1.1), as demonstrated by Hu in a 1947 paper [4].
7.1.1 The Idea of GW Detectors
The first attempts to construct experimental apparats able to detect gravitational waves are due to the American physicist Joseph Weber, the founder of laser and maser physics.3 In the years 1955–1956, Weber worked at the Institute for Advanced Studies of Princeton with John Archibald Wheeler4 and developed the project of a
1As we are going to show in the present chapter the 1918 Einstein formula for the emission power can be retrieved from first principles (see (7.3.94)) and precisely involves the ratio of actual velocities with respect to the speed light raised to power five.
2Nathan Rosen, (Brooklyn 1909, Haifa 1995) was the author, together with Einstein and Podolsky of the famous 1935 paper where the possibility that Quantum Mechanics might be incomplete was put forward. In the EPR paper the existence of hidden variables was conjectured and the probabilistic interpretation of Quantum Mechanics questioned. Yet, as it is widely known, all experimental tests have always confirmed Quantum Mechanics and rejected any competitor theory.
3Joseph Weber (1919–2000) was an American physicist. Born in Paterson, New Jersey, he died in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. After serving in the Navy during war-times, where he studied electronics, Weber graduated from the University of Maryland at College Park and obtained his Ph.D. with a thesis on microwave spectroscopy. In 1952 he gave a public lecture in Ottawa where he laid down the principles behind the construction of what were later called lasers and masers. These ideas were developed simultaneously by Charles Townes, Nikolay Basov, and Aleksandr Prokhorov, who built working prototypes of these devices, and received the Nobel Prize for this work in 1964.
4John Archibald Wheeler (July 9, 1911–April 13, 2008) was an eminent American theoretical physicist. He ranks among the later collaborators of Albert Einstein and includes Richard Feynman, Kip Thorne, Hugh Everett and Tullio Regge among his Ph.D. students. He tried to achieve Einstein’s vision of a unified field theory. He is also known for having coined the terms black hole and wormhole. As many other American physicists Wheeler participated in the Manhattan Project for the construction of the Atomic Bomb. For a few decades, General Relativity was somewhat neglected by the main stream of Physics, being detached from experiment. Wheeler was a key figure in the revival of the subject, leading the school at Princeton, while Dennis Sciama and Yakov Zel’dovich developed the subject in Cambridge and Moscow. The work of Wheeler and his students contributed greatly to the golden age of General Relativity.
7.1 Introduction |
275 |
Fig. 7.1 The antenna Explorer is a cylinder of Al5056, it weights 2300 kg, it is 3 meter long and it has a diameter of 60 cm. It is cooled at the temperature of liquid helium (4.2 K) and it operates at the temperature of 2 K, which is reached by lowering the pressure on the liquid helium reservoir. Its resonance frequencies are around 906 and 923 Hz
gravitational antenna made of a resonant metallic bar, which he further improved during a long visit at the University of Leiden in the Netherlands. In the early 1960s Weber developed the first wave detectors and began publishing papers where he claimed evidence of such a detection. In 1972 one of Weber’s bar detectors was sent to the moon on the Apollo 17th lunar mission.
Weber’s claims were received with high skepticism by the scientific community and the systematic error inherent to the large noise of his detectors was demonstrated to invalidate his conclusions. Notwithstanding the fact that his efforts were inconclusive, Weber is nonetheless credited as the father of gravitational wave experiments.
The lead in this direction was then taken by the Italians under the stimulus of Edoardo Amaldi. The idea of starting an experiment aiming to detect GW in Rome was stimulated by the Course on Experimental Tests of Gravitational Theories held in summer 1961 at the Scuola Internazionale E. Fermi in Varenna, where the problem was discussed by J. Weber. The program remained rather vague for practical reasons until 1968, when W. Fairbank spent a few months in Rome at G. Careri’s low temperature laboratory. When Fairbank mentioned his intention of starting the development of a low temperature gravitational antenna, Careri, who was informed for long time of the interest of Edoardo Amaldi in the subject, suggested a first direct contact. A group formed by Edoardo Amaldi, Massimo Cerdonio, Renzo Marconero and Guido Pizzella was created and a long term research project started which eventually resulted in the creation of the sophisticated, ultra-cryogenic, barantennae, nowadays operating in the sites of CERN and of the National Laboratories of Frascati, respectively known as Explorer, Nautilus and Auriga (Fig. 7.1).
The operating concept of bar-antennae is extremely simple. A gravitational wave is a propagating deformation of space-time geometry, which induces a vibrating deformation of macroscopic objects. Orthogonal directions, in the plane transverse to the propagation direction of the wave, are alternatively stretched and compressed. Correspondingly, the bar should be compressed and stretched: if the wave frequency is close to its resonance frequency, the bar will resonate and the resonance can be detected by means of sophisticated electronics. The problem is just that of sensitivity. The space displacements to be measured are of the order of 10−18–10−20 cm.