- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Classical Physics Between the End of the XIX and the Dawn of the XX Century
- •1.2.1 Maxwell Equations
- •1.2.2 Luminiferous Aether and the Michelson Morley Experiment
- •1.2.3 Maxwell Equations and Lorentz Transformations
- •1.3 The Principle of Special Relativity
- •1.3.1 Minkowski Space
- •1.4 Mathematical Definition of the Lorentz Group
- •1.4.1 The Lorentz Lie Algebra and Its Generators
- •1.4.2 Retrieving Special Lorentz Transformations
- •1.5 Representations of the Lorentz Group
- •1.5.1 The Fundamental Spinor Representation
- •1.6 Lorentz Covariant Field Theories and the Little Group
- •1.8 Criticism of Special Relativity: Opening the Road to General Relativity
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Differentiable Manifolds
- •2.2.1 Homeomorphisms and the Definition of Manifolds
- •2.2.2 Functions on Manifolds
- •2.2.3 Germs of Smooth Functions
- •2.3 Tangent and Cotangent Spaces
- •2.4 Fibre Bundles
- •2.5 Tangent and Cotangent Bundles
- •2.5.1 Sections of a Bundle
- •2.5.2 The Lie Algebra of Vector Fields
- •2.5.3 The Cotangent Bundle and Differential Forms
- •2.5.4 Differential k-Forms
- •2.5.4.1 Exterior Forms
- •2.5.4.2 Exterior Differential Forms
- •2.6 Homotopy, Homology and Cohomology
- •2.6.1 Homotopy
- •2.6.2 Homology
- •2.6.3 Homology and Cohomology Groups: General Construction
- •2.6.4 Relation Between Homotopy and Homology
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 A Historical Outline
- •3.2.1 Gauss Introduces Intrinsic Geometry and Curvilinear Coordinates
- •3.2.3 Parallel Transport and Connections
- •3.2.4 The Metric Connection and Tensor Calculus from Christoffel to Einstein, via Ricci and Levi Civita
- •3.2.5 Mobiles Frames from Frenet and Serret to Cartan
- •3.3 Connections on Principal Bundles: The Mathematical Definition
- •3.3.1 Mathematical Preliminaries on Lie Groups
- •3.3.1.1 Left-/Right-Invariant Vector Fields
- •3.3.1.2 Maurer-Cartan Forms on Lie Group Manifolds
- •3.3.1.3 Maurer Cartan Equations
- •3.3.2 Ehresmann Connections on a Principle Fibre Bundle
- •3.3.2.1 The Connection One-Form
- •Gauge Transformations
- •Horizontal Vector Fields and Covariant Derivatives
- •3.4 Connections on a Vector Bundle
- •3.5 An Illustrative Example of Fibre-Bundle and Connection
- •3.5.1 The Magnetic Monopole and the Hopf Fibration of S3
- •The U(1)-Connection of the Dirac Magnetic Monopole
- •3.6.1 Signatures
- •3.7 The Levi Civita Connection
- •3.7.1 Affine Connections
- •3.7.2 Curvature and Torsion of an Affine Connection
- •Torsion and Torsionless Connections
- •The Levi Civita Metric Connection
- •3.8 Geodesics
- •3.9 Geodesics in Lorentzian and Riemannian Manifolds: Two Simple Examples
- •3.9.1 The Lorentzian Example of dS2
- •3.9.1.1 Null Geodesics
- •3.9.1.2 Time-Like Geodesics
- •3.9.1.3 Space-Like Geodesics
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Keplerian Motions in Newtonian Mechanics
- •4.3 The Orbit Equations of a Massive Particle in Schwarzschild Geometry
- •4.3.1 Extrema of the Effective Potential and Circular Orbits
- •Minimum and Maximum
- •Energy of a Particle in a Circular Orbit
- •4.4 The Periastron Advance of Planets or Stars
- •4.4.1 Perturbative Treatment of the Periastron Advance
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Locally Inertial Frames and the Vielbein Formalism
- •5.2.1 The Vielbein
- •5.2.2 The Spin-Connection
- •5.2.3 The Poincaré Bundle
- •5.3 The Structure of Classical Electrodynamics and Yang-Mills Theories
- •5.3.1 Hodge Duality
- •5.3.2 Geometrical Rewriting of the Gauge Action
- •5.3.3 Yang-Mills Theory in Vielbein Formalism
- •5.4 Soldering of the Lorentz Bundle to the Tangent Bundle
- •5.4.1 Gravitational Coupling of Spinorial Fields
- •5.5 Einstein Field Equations
- •5.6 The Action of Gravity
- •5.6.1 Torsion Equation
- •5.6.1.1 Torsionful Connections
- •The Torsion of Dirac Fields
- •Dilaton Torsion
- •5.6.2 The Einstein Equation
- •5.6.4 Examples of Stress-Energy-Tensors
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of the Yang-Mills Field
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of a Scalar Field
- •5.7 Weak Field Limit of Einstein Equations
- •5.7.1 Gauge Fixing
- •5.7.2 The Spin of the Graviton
- •5.8 The Bottom-Up Approach, or Gravity à la Feynmann
- •5.9 Retrieving the Schwarzschild Metric from Einstein Equations
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction and Historical Outline
- •6.2 The Stress Energy Tensor of a Perfect Fluid
- •6.3 Interior Solutions and the Stellar Equilibrium Equation
- •6.3.1 Integration of the Pressure Equation in the Case of Uniform Density
- •6.3.1.1 Solution in the Newtonian Case
- •6.3.1.2 Integration of the Relativistic Pressure Equation
- •6.3.2 The Central Pressure of a Relativistic Star
- •6.4 The Chandrasekhar Mass-Limit
- •6.4.1.1 Idealized Models of White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars
- •White Dwarfs
- •Neutron Stars
- •6.4.2 The Equilibrium Equation
- •6.4.3 Polytropes and the Chandrasekhar Mass
- •6.5 Conclusive Remarks on Stellar Equilibrium
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.1.1 The Idea of GW Detectors
- •7.1.2 The Arecibo Radio Telescope
- •7.1.2.1 Discovery of the Crab Pulsar
- •7.1.2.2 The 1974 Discovery of the Binary System PSR1913+16
- •7.1.3 The Coalescence of Binaries and the Interferometer Detectors
- •7.2 Green Functions
- •7.2.1 The Laplace Operator and Potential Theory
- •7.2.2 The Relativistic Propagators
- •7.2.2.1 The Retarded Potential
- •7.3 Emission of Gravitational Waves
- •7.3.1 The Stress Energy 3-Form of the Gravitational Field
- •7.3.2 Energy and Momentum of a Plane Gravitational Wave
- •7.3.2.1 Calculation of the Spin Connection
- •7.3.3 Multipolar Expansion of the Perturbation
- •7.3.3.1 Multipolar Expansion
- •7.3.4 Energy Loss by Quadrupole Radiation
- •7.3.4.1 Integration on Solid Angles
- •7.4 Quadruple Radiation from the Binary Pulsar System
- •7.4.1 Keplerian Parameters of a Binary Star System
- •7.4.2 Shrinking of the Orbit and Gravitational Waves
- •7.4.2.1 Calculation of the Moment of Inertia Tensor
- •7.4.3 The Fate of the Binary System
- •7.4.4 The Double Pulsar
- •7.5 Conclusive Remarks on Gravitational Waves
- •References
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Mathematica Packages
- •B.1 Periastropack
- •Programme
- •Main Programme Periastro
- •Subroutine Perihelkep
- •Subroutine Perihelgr
- •Examples
- •B.2 Metrigravpack
- •Metric Gravity
- •Routines: Metrigrav
- •Mainmetric
- •Metricresume
- •Routine Metrigrav
- •Calculation of the Ricci Tensor of the Reissner Nordstrom Metric Using Metrigrav
- •Index
286 |
7 Gravitational Waves and the Binary Pulsars |
7.3 Emission of Gravitational Waves
In Chap. 5 we studied the linearized form of Einstein equations and, after fixing the de Donder gauge, we arrived at the following form:
γμν = −16π GTμν
(7.3.1)
∂μγμν = 0
where γμν is a linear redefinition of the metric deformation around its flat Minkowskian average:
gμν (x) = ημν + hμν (x) + O h2
(7.3.2)
γμν (x) = hμν − 1 ημν hρσ (x)ηρσ
2
Using the retarded Green function (7.2.18) to solve these linearized equations (7.3.1), we obtain the following expression for the field γμν (x) generated by a matter system, whose description is encoded in the stress-energy tensor Tμν (x):
γμν (x) |
= − |
4G |
d3x |
Tμν (x0 − |x − x |, x ) |
(7.3.3) |
||
|
|||||||
|
|
|
x |
x |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| − |
|
|
As already emphasized the integral is extended over the past light-cone of the point, whose coordinates are xμ. The above solution represents the disturbance in the gravitational field produced at point xμ by the presence and motion of some matter in another distant region of space-time. Obviously the disturbance is felt only after the time needed for the signal to travel (at the speed of light) the distance separating xμ from the region where Tμν is present.
Relying on the above formula, our main concern is that of evaluating the energy transported by a linearized gravitational wave and relate this latter to the relevant deformations of the source-system. This procedure will produce an evaluation of the emission power of a gravitational wave source. At the end of our elaborations we shall discover that such a power, namely the amount of energy emitted per unit time, is proportional to the modulus squared of the third derivative of the source quadruple moment. This is typically a very small quantity and that is the main reason why gravitational waves have so far escaped direct measurement.
7.3.1 The Stress Energy 3-Form of the Gravitational Field
In order to calculate the energy transported by the gravitational wave we have to define the stress-energy tensor not of matter, but of the gravitational field itself. In the case of general metrics, the definition of mass, energy and momentum of the gravitational field corresponds to an ambiguous problem, since to introduce a stressenergy tensor we need a background reference metric, which is not uniquely given.
7.3 Emission of Gravitational Waves |
287 |
Yet, in the case of linearized gravity, the reference metric is uniquely identified by the undeformed Minkowski metric. In this case a simple manipulation of Einstein equations allows to derive the correct expression of the stress-energy tensor.
We start from the field equations in differential form language:
dEa + ωab Ecηbc = 0
(7.3.4)
Rab Ecεabcd = κ Td
where Ea is the vierbein, ωab the spin connection and κ = 16π G/3. We insert the definition of the curvature
|
|
Rab = dωab + ωac ωcb |
(7.3.5) |
in the second of (7.3.4) and we rewrite its left hand side as follows: |
|
||
dωab Ecεabcd = d ωab Ecεabcd + ωab dEcεabcd |
(7.3.6) |
||
Then using the torsion equation, namely the first of (7.3.4) we put: |
|
||
|
|
dEc = −ωcb Eb |
(7.3.7) |
and we obtain: |
|
||
dωab Ecεabcd = d ωab Ecεabcd − ωab ωcf Ef εabcd |
(7.3.8) |
||
Hence Einstein equations can be rewritten as: |
|
||
|
|
d ωab Ecεabcd = κ Td − td |
(7.3.9) |
where the 3-form |
|
||
1 |
|
|
|
td = |
|
ωab ωcf Ef − ωaf ωf b Ec εabcd |
(7.3.10) |
κ |
can be declared to encode the stress-energy tensor of the gravitational field. Indeed, as a consequence of (7.3.9) the following 3-form
Td(total) ≡ Td − td |
(7.3.11) |
is conserved in the ordinary sense: |
|
d Td(total) = 0 |
(7.3.12) |
Note that this definition is not invariant with respect to local Lorentz transformations since it depends on the bare field ωab . However it is invariant against global Lorentz transformations and therefore it can be used in the asymptotic region of a space-time which is nearly flat.