- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Classical Physics Between the End of the XIX and the Dawn of the XX Century
- •1.2.1 Maxwell Equations
- •1.2.2 Luminiferous Aether and the Michelson Morley Experiment
- •1.2.3 Maxwell Equations and Lorentz Transformations
- •1.3 The Principle of Special Relativity
- •1.3.1 Minkowski Space
- •1.4 Mathematical Definition of the Lorentz Group
- •1.4.1 The Lorentz Lie Algebra and Its Generators
- •1.4.2 Retrieving Special Lorentz Transformations
- •1.5 Representations of the Lorentz Group
- •1.5.1 The Fundamental Spinor Representation
- •1.6 Lorentz Covariant Field Theories and the Little Group
- •1.8 Criticism of Special Relativity: Opening the Road to General Relativity
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Differentiable Manifolds
- •2.2.1 Homeomorphisms and the Definition of Manifolds
- •2.2.2 Functions on Manifolds
- •2.2.3 Germs of Smooth Functions
- •2.3 Tangent and Cotangent Spaces
- •2.4 Fibre Bundles
- •2.5 Tangent and Cotangent Bundles
- •2.5.1 Sections of a Bundle
- •2.5.2 The Lie Algebra of Vector Fields
- •2.5.3 The Cotangent Bundle and Differential Forms
- •2.5.4 Differential k-Forms
- •2.5.4.1 Exterior Forms
- •2.5.4.2 Exterior Differential Forms
- •2.6 Homotopy, Homology and Cohomology
- •2.6.1 Homotopy
- •2.6.2 Homology
- •2.6.3 Homology and Cohomology Groups: General Construction
- •2.6.4 Relation Between Homotopy and Homology
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 A Historical Outline
- •3.2.1 Gauss Introduces Intrinsic Geometry and Curvilinear Coordinates
- •3.2.3 Parallel Transport and Connections
- •3.2.4 The Metric Connection and Tensor Calculus from Christoffel to Einstein, via Ricci and Levi Civita
- •3.2.5 Mobiles Frames from Frenet and Serret to Cartan
- •3.3 Connections on Principal Bundles: The Mathematical Definition
- •3.3.1 Mathematical Preliminaries on Lie Groups
- •3.3.1.1 Left-/Right-Invariant Vector Fields
- •3.3.1.2 Maurer-Cartan Forms on Lie Group Manifolds
- •3.3.1.3 Maurer Cartan Equations
- •3.3.2 Ehresmann Connections on a Principle Fibre Bundle
- •3.3.2.1 The Connection One-Form
- •Gauge Transformations
- •Horizontal Vector Fields and Covariant Derivatives
- •3.4 Connections on a Vector Bundle
- •3.5 An Illustrative Example of Fibre-Bundle and Connection
- •3.5.1 The Magnetic Monopole and the Hopf Fibration of S3
- •The U(1)-Connection of the Dirac Magnetic Monopole
- •3.6.1 Signatures
- •3.7 The Levi Civita Connection
- •3.7.1 Affine Connections
- •3.7.2 Curvature and Torsion of an Affine Connection
- •Torsion and Torsionless Connections
- •The Levi Civita Metric Connection
- •3.8 Geodesics
- •3.9 Geodesics in Lorentzian and Riemannian Manifolds: Two Simple Examples
- •3.9.1 The Lorentzian Example of dS2
- •3.9.1.1 Null Geodesics
- •3.9.1.2 Time-Like Geodesics
- •3.9.1.3 Space-Like Geodesics
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Keplerian Motions in Newtonian Mechanics
- •4.3 The Orbit Equations of a Massive Particle in Schwarzschild Geometry
- •4.3.1 Extrema of the Effective Potential and Circular Orbits
- •Minimum and Maximum
- •Energy of a Particle in a Circular Orbit
- •4.4 The Periastron Advance of Planets or Stars
- •4.4.1 Perturbative Treatment of the Periastron Advance
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Locally Inertial Frames and the Vielbein Formalism
- •5.2.1 The Vielbein
- •5.2.2 The Spin-Connection
- •5.2.3 The Poincaré Bundle
- •5.3 The Structure of Classical Electrodynamics and Yang-Mills Theories
- •5.3.1 Hodge Duality
- •5.3.2 Geometrical Rewriting of the Gauge Action
- •5.3.3 Yang-Mills Theory in Vielbein Formalism
- •5.4 Soldering of the Lorentz Bundle to the Tangent Bundle
- •5.4.1 Gravitational Coupling of Spinorial Fields
- •5.5 Einstein Field Equations
- •5.6 The Action of Gravity
- •5.6.1 Torsion Equation
- •5.6.1.1 Torsionful Connections
- •The Torsion of Dirac Fields
- •Dilaton Torsion
- •5.6.2 The Einstein Equation
- •5.6.4 Examples of Stress-Energy-Tensors
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of the Yang-Mills Field
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of a Scalar Field
- •5.7 Weak Field Limit of Einstein Equations
- •5.7.1 Gauge Fixing
- •5.7.2 The Spin of the Graviton
- •5.8 The Bottom-Up Approach, or Gravity à la Feynmann
- •5.9 Retrieving the Schwarzschild Metric from Einstein Equations
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction and Historical Outline
- •6.2 The Stress Energy Tensor of a Perfect Fluid
- •6.3 Interior Solutions and the Stellar Equilibrium Equation
- •6.3.1 Integration of the Pressure Equation in the Case of Uniform Density
- •6.3.1.1 Solution in the Newtonian Case
- •6.3.1.2 Integration of the Relativistic Pressure Equation
- •6.3.2 The Central Pressure of a Relativistic Star
- •6.4 The Chandrasekhar Mass-Limit
- •6.4.1.1 Idealized Models of White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars
- •White Dwarfs
- •Neutron Stars
- •6.4.2 The Equilibrium Equation
- •6.4.3 Polytropes and the Chandrasekhar Mass
- •6.5 Conclusive Remarks on Stellar Equilibrium
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.1.1 The Idea of GW Detectors
- •7.1.2 The Arecibo Radio Telescope
- •7.1.2.1 Discovery of the Crab Pulsar
- •7.1.2.2 The 1974 Discovery of the Binary System PSR1913+16
- •7.1.3 The Coalescence of Binaries and the Interferometer Detectors
- •7.2 Green Functions
- •7.2.1 The Laplace Operator and Potential Theory
- •7.2.2 The Relativistic Propagators
- •7.2.2.1 The Retarded Potential
- •7.3 Emission of Gravitational Waves
- •7.3.1 The Stress Energy 3-Form of the Gravitational Field
- •7.3.2 Energy and Momentum of a Plane Gravitational Wave
- •7.3.2.1 Calculation of the Spin Connection
- •7.3.3 Multipolar Expansion of the Perturbation
- •7.3.3.1 Multipolar Expansion
- •7.3.4 Energy Loss by Quadrupole Radiation
- •7.3.4.1 Integration on Solid Angles
- •7.4 Quadruple Radiation from the Binary Pulsar System
- •7.4.1 Keplerian Parameters of a Binary Star System
- •7.4.2 Shrinking of the Orbit and Gravitational Waves
- •7.4.2.1 Calculation of the Moment of Inertia Tensor
- •7.4.3 The Fate of the Binary System
- •7.4.4 The Double Pulsar
- •7.5 Conclusive Remarks on Gravitational Waves
- •References
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Mathematica Packages
- •B.1 Periastropack
- •Programme
- •Main Programme Periastro
- •Subroutine Perihelkep
- •Subroutine Perihelgr
- •Examples
- •B.2 Metrigravpack
- •Metric Gravity
- •Routines: Metrigrav
- •Mainmetric
- •Metricresume
- •Routine Metrigrav
- •Calculation of the Ricci Tensor of the Reissner Nordstrom Metric Using Metrigrav
- •Index
3.3 Connections on Principal Bundles: The Mathematical Definition |
115 |
By explicit evaluation as in (3.3.37) we can also show that any left-invariant vector field commutes with any right-invariant one and vice-versa. Indeed we find:
TA(L) |
|
d d |
f |
gB (t)ρgA(τ ) − f |
gB (t)ρgA(τ )%t |
|
τ |
|
0 |
||
, TB(R) (f )(ρ) = dt dτ |
= |
= |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
||
|
= 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.3.41) |
The interpretation of these relations is indeed very simple. The left-invariant vector fields happen to be the infinitesimal generators of the right-translations while the right-invariant ones generate the left translations. Hence the vanishing of the above commutators just amounts to say that the left-invariant are indeed invariant under left translations while the right invariant are insensitive to right translations.
3.3.1.2 Maurer-Cartan Forms on Lie Group Manifolds
Let us now consider left-invariant (respectively right-invariant) one-forms on the group manifold. They were defined in (3.3.15). Starting from the construction of the left- (right-)invariant vector fields it is very easy to construct an independent set of n differential forms with the invariance property (3.3.15) that are in one-to-one correspondence with the generators of the Lie algebra G. Let us consider the explicit form of the T(L/R)A as first order differential operators:
(L/R) |
(l/r) |
∂ |
|
|
|
||
|
−→ |
|
|
TA |
= ΣAi (α) ∂αi |
(3.3.42) |
According to the already introduced convention αμ are the group parameters and the square matrix:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
(l/r) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
= |
|
|
= |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1, . . . , n |
(3.3.43) |
||
Σ (α) |
|
|
|
|
|
i |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A 1,...,n |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
whose entries are functions of the parameters can be calculated starting from the constructive algorithm encoded in (3.3.33). In terms of the inverse of the above
(l/r)
matrix denoted ΣαA(α) and such that:
(l/r) |
(l/r) |
|
ΣiA(α) ΣBi (α) = δBA |
(3.3.44) |
|
we can define the following set of n differential one-forms: |
|
|
|
(l/r) |
|
σ(L/R)A |
= ΣiA(α) dαi |
(3.3.45) |
116 3 Connections and Metrics
which by construction satisfy the relations:
σ(L/R)A TB(L/R) = δBA |
(3.3.46) |
From (3.3.46) follows that all the forms σL/RA are left- (respectively right-) invariant. Indeed we have:
γ G : Lγ σ(L)A TB(L) ≡ σ(L)A Lγ TB(L) = σ(L)A TB(L) = δBA |
(3.3.47) |
which implies Lγ σ(L)A = σ A since both forms have the same values on a basis of sections of the tangent bundle as it is provided by the set of left-invariant vector fields T(L)B . A completely identical proof holds obviously true for the right-invariant one-forms σ(R)A defined by the same construction.
We come therefore to the conclusion that on each Lie group manifold G we can construct both a left-invariant σ(L) and a right-invariant σ(R) Lie algebra valued one-form defined as it follows:
n |
|
G σ(L) = σ(L)A tA |
(3.3.48) |
A=1 |
|
n |
|
G σ(R) = σ(R)A tA |
(3.3.49) |
A=1 |
|
where, just as before, {tA} denotes a basis of generators of the abstract Lie algebra G. One may wonder how the Lie algebra forms σ(L/R) could be constructed directly without going through the previous construction of the left- (right-)invariant vector fields. The answer is very simple. Let g(α) G be a running element of the Lie group parameterized by the parameters α which constitute a coordinate patch for
the corresponding group manifold and consider the one-forms:
θL = g−1 dg = g−1∂i g dαi ; |
θR = g dg−1 = g∂i g−1 dαi |
(3.3.50) |
It is immediate to check that such one-forms are left- (respectively right-) invariant. For instance we have:
L |
θL |
= |
(γ g)−1 d(γ g) |
= |
g−1 |
γ −1γ dg |
= |
g−1 dg |
= |
θL |
(3.3.51) |
γ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What might not be immediately evident to the reader is why the left- (right-)invariant one-forms θL/R introduced in (3.3.50) should be Lie algebra valued. The answer is actually very simple. From his basic courses in Lie group theory the reader should recall that the relation between Lie algebras and Lie groups is provided by the exponential map: every element of a Lie group which lies in the branch connected to the identity can be represented as the exponential of a suitable Lie algebra element:
γ G0 G, X G \ γ = exp X |
(3.3.52) |
3.3 Connections on Principal Bundles: The Mathematical Definition |
117 |
The Lie algebra element actually singles out an entire one parameter subgroup:
t R, G0 γ (t) = exp[tX] |
(3.3.53) |
With an obvious calculation we obtain: |
|
γ −1(t) dγ (t) = X dt G |
(3.3.54) |
namely the left-invariant one-form associated with this parameter subgroup lies in the Lie algebra. This result extends to any group element, so that indeed the previously constructed Lie algebra valued left- (right-)invariant one forms σL/R and the theta forms defined in (3.3.50) are just the very same objects:
σL/R = θL/R |
(3.3.55) |
All the above statements become much clearer when we consider classical groups whose elements are just matrices subject to some defining algebraic condition. Consider for instance the rotation group in N-dimensions SO(N ). All elements of this group are orthogonal N × N matrices:
O SO(N ) O T O = 1N×N |
(3.3.56) |
The elements of the orthogonal Lie algebra so(N) are instead antisymmetric matrices:
A so(N) AT + A = 0N×N |
(3.3.57) |
Calculating the transpose of the matrix Θ = O T dO we immediately obtain: |
|
ΘT = O T dO T = dO T O = −O T dO = −Θ Θ so(N) |
(3.3.58) |
which proves that the left-invariant one-form is indeed Lie algebra valued.
3.3.1.3 Maurer Cartan Equations
It is now of the utmost interest to consider the following identity which follows immediately from the definitions (3.3.50) and (3.3.55) of the left- (right-)invariant one-forms:
F[σ ] ≡ dσL/R + σL/R σL/R = 0 |
(3.3.59) |
To prove the above statement it is sufficient to observe that g−1 dg = −dg−1 g. The reason why we introduced a special name F[σ ] for the Lie algebra valued
two-form dσ + σ σ , which turns out to be zero in the case of left- (right-)invariant one-forms σ , is that precisely this combination will play a fundamental role in the theory of connections, representing their curvature. Equation (3.3.59) are named the Maurer Cartan equations of the considered Lie algebra G and they translate into the statement that left- (right-)invariant one-forms have vanishing curvature.