Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Англ.яз.doc
Скачиваний:
77
Добавлен:
21.02.2016
Размер:
26.26 Mб
Скачать

Unit 12.

International Trade.

Pre-reading tasks:

1. Answer the questions:

  • Look at these pictures and describe them.

  • Who is the international trade profitable for?

  • Is the international trade benefit or evil?

  • Can modern world exist without trade?

  • How can trade influence national traditions,

habits, and self-awareness?

Whenever money is the principle object of life with either man or nation, it is both got ill, and spent ill, it does both harm in the

getting and spending”.

John Ruskin

2. Comment on the above words quotation.

3. Match English and Ukrainian equivalents and use them in your speech.

1. spacecraft

    • сприяти, стимулювати

2. argue

    • виправдовувати

3. vested interest

    • митний союз

4. endowment

    • відмовлятися

5. persist

    • майнове право

6. forgo

    • спільний ринок

7. self-sufficient

    • за чийсь рахунок

8. retain

    • утримуватися, зберігатися

9. fallacious

    • загублені можливості, витрати невикористаних можливостей

10. justify

    • космічний корабель

11. at the expense of

    • сперечатися, обговорювати

12. impose

    • внесок, наділ, дар, pl. здібності

13. opportunity costs

    • самодостатній

14. promote

    • підтримувати, зберігати

15. preferential trading arrangements

    • помилковий, хибний

16. free trade area

    • нав’язувати, обкладати, оподатковувати

17. customs union

    • привілейовані торговельні угоди

18. common market

    • зона вільної торгівлі

Read text 1.

Text 1.

International trade.

Without international trade we wouldall be much poorer. There would be some items like bananas, pineapples, coffee, cotton clothes, foreign holidays and uranium that we would simply have to go without. Then there would be other items like wine and spacecraft and space exploration that we could only produce very inefficiently.

International trade has the potential to benefit all participating countries.

Totally free trade, however, may bring problems to countries or to groups of people within those countries. Many people argue strongly for restrictions on trade. Textile workers see their jobs threatened by cheap imported cloth. Car manufacturers worry about falling sales as customers switch to Japanese models or to cheap Eastern European ones. Are people justified in fearing international competition, or are they merely trying to protect some vested interest at the expense of everyone else?

And there exists a partial form of free trade. This is where a group of countries agree to have free trade between themselves, but still impose trade restrictions on the rest of the world. Free trade may be realized under the various titles of customs unions, free trade areas and common markets.

Countries have different endowments of factors of production. They differ in population density, labour skills, climate, fertility, raw materials, capital equipment, etc. These differences tend to persist because factors are relatively immobile between countries. Obviously land and climate are totally immobile, but even with labour and capital there are more restrictions on their international movement than on their movement within countries. Thus the ability to supply goods differs between countries.

What this means is that the relative costs of producing goods will vary from country to country.

When one country can produce a good with fewer resources than another country it is said to have an absolute advantage in that good.

A country has a comparative advantage over another in the production of a good if it can produce it at a lower opportunity cost: i.e. if it has to forgo less of other goods in order to produce it.

If countries are to gain from trade, they should export those goods in which they have a comparative advantage and import those goods in which they have a comparative disadvantage. Given this we can state a law of comparative advantage: provided opportunity costs of various goods differ in two countries, both of them can gain from mutual trade if they specialize in producing (and exporting) those goods that have relatively low opportunity costs compared with the other country. Countries use various methods to restrict trade, including tariffs, quotas, exchange controls, import licensing, export taxes and legal and administrative barriers. Countries may also promote their own industries by subsidies.

Sometimes countries may have definite objectives in restricting trade such as remaining self-sufficient in certain strategic products, not trading with certain countries of which it disapproves, protecting traditional ways of life or simply retaining a non-specialized economy.

Arguments for restricting trade are often fallacious. In general, trade brings benefits to countries. And there are, as we said above, so called preferential trading arrangements.

Free trade areas is where member countries remove tariffs and quotas between themselves, but retain whatever restrictions each member chooses with non-member countries.

A customs union is like a free trade area, but in addition members must adopt common external tariffs and quotas with non-member countries.

A common market is where member countries operate as a single market. Like a customs union there are no tariffs and quotas between member countries and there are common external tariffs and quotas. But a common market goes further than this. A full common market includes a common system of taxation, governing production, employment and trade, free movement of labour, capital and materials and of goods and services.

COMPREHENSION CHECK

Exercise 1. Answer the questions:

  1. Does totally free trade exist?

  2. Why is free trade existence impossible?

  3. What is international trade?

  4. Does international trade promote progress or regress? Why?

  5. What forms of international free trade do you know?

  6. What factors can influence a comparative advantage?

  7. What does the law of comparative advantage read?

  8. What are preferential trading arrangements?

Let’s ponder!

Your Opinion.

If you were a Minister of Foreign Trade:

  1. What countries would you include into the list for preferential trading arrangements?

Why would you include these countries? What goods can be included into our comparative advantage? Why?

Exercise 2. Fill in the gap with an appropriate word.

trading

trade

objective

buy

sell

attempt

preventing

protective tariffs

restriction

means

nations

tariffs

Free 1 … consists simply in letting people 2 … and 3 … as they want to buy and sell. It is trade 4 … that require force, for they consist in 5 … people from doing what they want to do. Protective 6 … are as much applications of force as are blockading squadrons, and their 7 … is the same – to prevent trade. The difference between the two is that blockading squadrons are a 8 … whereby 9 … seek to prevent their enemies from trading; 10 … are a means whereby nations 11 ... to prevent their own people from 12 … .

Exercise 3. Put the verb in brackets in the right tense.

In many respect Toyota 1(be) a victim of its own success. Until the 1960s Toyota 2(view) as little Japanese company. In 1970 it 3(produce) 1.6 million vehicles and by 1990 the figure 4(increase) to 4.12 million. In the process Toyota 5(rise) to become the third largest automobile company and the largest automobile exporter in the world. For most of its history Toyota 6(export) automobiles to the world market from its plants in Japan. But by early 1980s political pressures and economic regulations in the U.S.A. and Europe 7(force) an initially reluctant Toyota to rethink its importing strategy. Toyota 8(agree) already to “voluntary” export restraints with the U.S.A. As a result the company 9(establish) a 50/50 joint venture with General Motors. For Toyota it 10(be) a chance to find out whether it could built quality cars abroad using American workers and suppliers. Fearing that European Union 11(limit) its expansion to the European market Toyota 12(join) other Japanese automobile companies to keep their share under 11% until 2010. Despite its apparent commitment to expand its US and European operations, it not 13(be) all smooth sailing. A major problem 14(be) building an overseas supplier network that 15(be) comparable to Toyota’s Japanese network. By now 70% of Toyota cars 16(assemble) in Europe and less than 40% in the U.S.A. To achieve this Toyota 17(embark) on an aggressive education aimed at familiarizing its local suppliers with Japanese production methods.

Read the text and be ready to discuss it. Use the vocabulary given below.

Text 2.