
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Classical Physics Between the End of the XIX and the Dawn of the XX Century
- •1.2.1 Maxwell Equations
- •1.2.2 Luminiferous Aether and the Michelson Morley Experiment
- •1.2.3 Maxwell Equations and Lorentz Transformations
- •1.3 The Principle of Special Relativity
- •1.3.1 Minkowski Space
- •1.4 Mathematical Definition of the Lorentz Group
- •1.4.1 The Lorentz Lie Algebra and Its Generators
- •1.4.2 Retrieving Special Lorentz Transformations
- •1.5 Representations of the Lorentz Group
- •1.5.1 The Fundamental Spinor Representation
- •1.6 Lorentz Covariant Field Theories and the Little Group
- •1.8 Criticism of Special Relativity: Opening the Road to General Relativity
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Differentiable Manifolds
- •2.2.1 Homeomorphisms and the Definition of Manifolds
- •2.2.2 Functions on Manifolds
- •2.2.3 Germs of Smooth Functions
- •2.3 Tangent and Cotangent Spaces
- •2.4 Fibre Bundles
- •2.5 Tangent and Cotangent Bundles
- •2.5.1 Sections of a Bundle
- •2.5.2 The Lie Algebra of Vector Fields
- •2.5.3 The Cotangent Bundle and Differential Forms
- •2.5.4 Differential k-Forms
- •2.5.4.1 Exterior Forms
- •2.5.4.2 Exterior Differential Forms
- •2.6 Homotopy, Homology and Cohomology
- •2.6.1 Homotopy
- •2.6.2 Homology
- •2.6.3 Homology and Cohomology Groups: General Construction
- •2.6.4 Relation Between Homotopy and Homology
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 A Historical Outline
- •3.2.1 Gauss Introduces Intrinsic Geometry and Curvilinear Coordinates
- •3.2.3 Parallel Transport and Connections
- •3.2.4 The Metric Connection and Tensor Calculus from Christoffel to Einstein, via Ricci and Levi Civita
- •3.2.5 Mobiles Frames from Frenet and Serret to Cartan
- •3.3 Connections on Principal Bundles: The Mathematical Definition
- •3.3.1 Mathematical Preliminaries on Lie Groups
- •3.3.1.1 Left-/Right-Invariant Vector Fields
- •3.3.1.2 Maurer-Cartan Forms on Lie Group Manifolds
- •3.3.1.3 Maurer Cartan Equations
- •3.3.2 Ehresmann Connections on a Principle Fibre Bundle
- •3.3.2.1 The Connection One-Form
- •Gauge Transformations
- •Horizontal Vector Fields and Covariant Derivatives
- •3.4 Connections on a Vector Bundle
- •3.5 An Illustrative Example of Fibre-Bundle and Connection
- •3.5.1 The Magnetic Monopole and the Hopf Fibration of S3
- •The U(1)-Connection of the Dirac Magnetic Monopole
- •3.6.1 Signatures
- •3.7 The Levi Civita Connection
- •3.7.1 Affine Connections
- •3.7.2 Curvature and Torsion of an Affine Connection
- •Torsion and Torsionless Connections
- •The Levi Civita Metric Connection
- •3.8 Geodesics
- •3.9 Geodesics in Lorentzian and Riemannian Manifolds: Two Simple Examples
- •3.9.1 The Lorentzian Example of dS2
- •3.9.1.1 Null Geodesics
- •3.9.1.2 Time-Like Geodesics
- •3.9.1.3 Space-Like Geodesics
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Keplerian Motions in Newtonian Mechanics
- •4.3 The Orbit Equations of a Massive Particle in Schwarzschild Geometry
- •4.3.1 Extrema of the Effective Potential and Circular Orbits
- •Minimum and Maximum
- •Energy of a Particle in a Circular Orbit
- •4.4 The Periastron Advance of Planets or Stars
- •4.4.1 Perturbative Treatment of the Periastron Advance
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Locally Inertial Frames and the Vielbein Formalism
- •5.2.1 The Vielbein
- •5.2.2 The Spin-Connection
- •5.2.3 The Poincaré Bundle
- •5.3 The Structure of Classical Electrodynamics and Yang-Mills Theories
- •5.3.1 Hodge Duality
- •5.3.2 Geometrical Rewriting of the Gauge Action
- •5.3.3 Yang-Mills Theory in Vielbein Formalism
- •5.4 Soldering of the Lorentz Bundle to the Tangent Bundle
- •5.4.1 Gravitational Coupling of Spinorial Fields
- •5.5 Einstein Field Equations
- •5.6 The Action of Gravity
- •5.6.1 Torsion Equation
- •5.6.1.1 Torsionful Connections
- •The Torsion of Dirac Fields
- •Dilaton Torsion
- •5.6.2 The Einstein Equation
- •5.6.4 Examples of Stress-Energy-Tensors
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of the Yang-Mills Field
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of a Scalar Field
- •5.7 Weak Field Limit of Einstein Equations
- •5.7.1 Gauge Fixing
- •5.7.2 The Spin of the Graviton
- •5.8 The Bottom-Up Approach, or Gravity à la Feynmann
- •5.9 Retrieving the Schwarzschild Metric from Einstein Equations
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction and Historical Outline
- •6.2 The Stress Energy Tensor of a Perfect Fluid
- •6.3 Interior Solutions and the Stellar Equilibrium Equation
- •6.3.1 Integration of the Pressure Equation in the Case of Uniform Density
- •6.3.1.1 Solution in the Newtonian Case
- •6.3.1.2 Integration of the Relativistic Pressure Equation
- •6.3.2 The Central Pressure of a Relativistic Star
- •6.4 The Chandrasekhar Mass-Limit
- •6.4.1.1 Idealized Models of White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars
- •White Dwarfs
- •Neutron Stars
- •6.4.2 The Equilibrium Equation
- •6.4.3 Polytropes and the Chandrasekhar Mass
- •6.5 Conclusive Remarks on Stellar Equilibrium
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.1.1 The Idea of GW Detectors
- •7.1.2 The Arecibo Radio Telescope
- •7.1.2.1 Discovery of the Crab Pulsar
- •7.1.2.2 The 1974 Discovery of the Binary System PSR1913+16
- •7.1.3 The Coalescence of Binaries and the Interferometer Detectors
- •7.2 Green Functions
- •7.2.1 The Laplace Operator and Potential Theory
- •7.2.2 The Relativistic Propagators
- •7.2.2.1 The Retarded Potential
- •7.3 Emission of Gravitational Waves
- •7.3.1 The Stress Energy 3-Form of the Gravitational Field
- •7.3.2 Energy and Momentum of a Plane Gravitational Wave
- •7.3.2.1 Calculation of the Spin Connection
- •7.3.3 Multipolar Expansion of the Perturbation
- •7.3.3.1 Multipolar Expansion
- •7.3.4 Energy Loss by Quadrupole Radiation
- •7.3.4.1 Integration on Solid Angles
- •7.4 Quadruple Radiation from the Binary Pulsar System
- •7.4.1 Keplerian Parameters of a Binary Star System
- •7.4.2 Shrinking of the Orbit and Gravitational Waves
- •7.4.2.1 Calculation of the Moment of Inertia Tensor
- •7.4.3 The Fate of the Binary System
- •7.4.4 The Double Pulsar
- •7.5 Conclusive Remarks on Gravitational Waves
- •References
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Mathematica Packages
- •B.1 Periastropack
- •Programme
- •Main Programme Periastro
- •Subroutine Perihelkep
- •Subroutine Perihelgr
- •Examples
- •B.2 Metrigravpack
- •Metric Gravity
- •Routines: Metrigrav
- •Mainmetric
- •Metricresume
- •Routine Metrigrav
- •Calculation of the Ricci Tensor of the Reissner Nordstrom Metric Using Metrigrav
- •Index
1.4 Mathematical Definition of the Lorentz Group |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|||||
For small velocities, developing in series of v/c we obtain: |
|
||||||||||
|
= |
|
+ |
2 |
|
c + |
|
c2 |
|
||
p0 |
|
mc |
|
1 |
mv2 |
1 |
|
O |
v2 |
|
(1.3.36) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
This suggests the interpretation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
p0 = E/c |
|
|
|
(1.3.37) |
where E is the energy of the considered particle. Indeed, so doing, we find:
E |
= |
mc2 |
|
1 |
mv2 |
+ |
O |
|
v2 |
|
(1.3.38) |
||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
energy+ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
c2 |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newtonian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
rest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kinetic energy
where we recognize the Newtonian kinetic energy plus an absolute normalization of the zeroth level of E, arbitrary in Newtonian mechanics and fixed to a precise value in the relativistic case, namely to the rest energy E0 = mc2.
The third principle of special relativity which concludes the construction is
N |
μ |
of an isolated physical |
Principle 1.3.3 The total D-momentum P μ = i=1 p(i) |
system made of N -components is a conserved quantity, namely all possible physical processes will preserve its value throughout time evolution. The correct transformations that relate inertial systems to each other is the Lorentz group, namely that group of linear substitutions which leaves the quadratic form (1.3.21) invariant.
1.4 Mathematical Definition of the Lorentz Group
Let us define mathematically the Lorentz group, which, as we emphasized in previous sections can be introduced for any space-time dimension D = 1 + (D − 1), where one is the number of time-like directions and D − 1 is the number of spacelike directions. In the classification of Classical Lie Groups, the Lorentz group is just SO(1, D − 1), whose elements are all those D × D matrices Λ that satisfy the following defining relation:
ΛT ηΛ = η |
(1.4.1) |
The reason of the above definition and of the choice of the form of the invariant matrix η was discussed in the previous section. It is dictated by the notion of Minkowski space-time and by the choice of (1.3.21) as the invariant quadratic form of Special Relativity.
Let us consider two physical events that in one inertial frame are described by the D-vectors {xμ, yμ}. In another inertial frame the same events will be described
16 |
1 Special Relativity: Setting the Stage |
by new D-vectors, obtained from the former ones by means of a linear substitution:
x˜μ = Λμν xν ; y˜μ = Λμν yν |
(1.4.2) |
The Minkowskian scalar product of the two events will be frame independent, namely:
(x, y) = (x,˜ y)˜ |
(1.4.3) |
if and only if the condition (1.4.1) is satisfied, as it is immediately evident by the transcription in matrix notation of the fundamental quadratic form:
(x, y) = xT ηy |
(1.4.4) |
So it is mandatory to study the structure of the Lie group SO(1, D − 1) and the properties of its representations. From a historical perspective it is worth recalling that by the end of the XIX century, the theory of Lie groups, namely of continuous groups whose product law has an analytic structure, had already reached perfection through the work of Killing and Cartan. As we discuss more extensively in Sect. 3.2.5, the classification of all simple Lie groups and the construction of their fundamental representations, including those of the exceptional ones was presented in Cartan’s doctoral thesis of 1894. Hence the study of the D-dimensional Lorentz group SO(1, D − 1) could be considered at the time of Minkowski just an application of a well established theory to a specific case. Yet the history of science is never so linear and the D = 4 Lorentz group was separately studied in all of his aspects and for his own sake by several authors in a large number of physical and mathematical papers.
1.4.1 The Lorentz Lie Algebra and Its Generators
Let us consider a Lorentz matrix Λ which is infinitesimally close to the identity, namely:
Λ = 1 |
+ M + O M2 |
(1.4.5) |
where M is a small matrix, all of |
its entries being 1. The defining |
condi- |
tion (1.4.1) translates at first order in the matrix M into the condition: |
|
|
MT η + ηM = 0 |
(1.4.6) |
which states that the matrix ηM is antisymmetric. Hence the Lorentz Lie algebra so(1, D − 1) is composed by all those matrices that satisfy (1.4.6). We easily construct the solution of such a problem, since, as a matrix, the Minkowskian metric η

1.4 Mathematical Definition of the Lorentz Group |
17 |
squares to unity η2 = 1. Hence it suffices to parameterize the space of antisymmetric matrices A and any matrix M satisfying condition (1.4.6) will be of the form:
M = ηX; X A XT = −XT |
(1.4.7) |
The space A has dimension 12 D(D − 1) and it is customary to introduce a basis of
21 D(D − 1) generators Jμν constructed in the following way. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
0 · · · |
|
· · · |
· · · |
|
· · · |
· · · |
· · · |
0 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
. . |
|
. |
. |
|
. |
. . . |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
. . |
|
. |
. |
|
. |
. . . |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
. . |
|
. |
. |
|
. |
. . . |
|
μ-row |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
0 |
· · · |
|
· · · |
0 |
ημμ |
0 |
· · · |
0 |
} |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
· · · |
|
· · · |
· · · |
|
· · · |
· · · |
· · · |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
. . |
|
. |
. |
|
. |
. . . |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
. . |
|
. |
. |
|
. |
. . . |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
. . |
|
. |
. |
|
. |
. . . |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Jμν |
≡ − |
Jνμ |
|
0 |
· · · |
|
· · · |
· · |
|
· · · |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1.4.8) |
|
|
= |
|
|
|
· · · |
· · · |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
0 |
· · · |
|
1 |
·0 |
|
0 |
0 |
} |
ν-row |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
· · · |
· · · |
0 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
· .· · |
|
· .· · |
· .· · |
|
· .· · |
· ·. · |
· ·. · . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. . |
|
. |
. |
|
. |
. . . |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
. . |
|
. |
. |
|
. |
. . . |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
0 |
· · · |
|
· · · |
· · · |
|
· · |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
· · · |
· · · |
0 |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
·0 |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
· · · |
|
|
· · · |
|
|
· · · |
· · · |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-column |
|
column |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
μ |
|
|
ν- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming |
by |
convention |
μ < ν, |
it follows from (1.4.8) that Jμν is a ma- |
|||||||||||||
trix all of |
whose entries |
vanish, except those at the intersection |
of |
the μth |
row with the νth column and at the intersection of the νth row with μth column. The entries μν and νμ of Jμν have both norm 1 and have the same sign if ημμ = 1 while they have opposite signs if ημμ = −1. This means that
the |
set of Jμν -generators contains a subset of D − 1 matrices, i.e. |
J0i that |
are |
symmetric and a subset of 21 (D − 1)(D − 2) antisymmetric ones |
Jij . The |
generators J0i are non-compact and give rise to special Lorentz transformations, while the generators Jij span the compact Lie subalgebra so(D − 1) so(1, D − 1). Altogether the commutation relations of this standard basis generators are:
[Jμν , Jρσ ] = −ημρ Jνσ + ηνρ Jμσ − ηνσ Jμρ + ημσ Jνρ |
(1.4.9) |
and a generic element of the Lorentz Lie algebra can be written as:
so(1, D − 1) M = |
1 |
εμν Jμν |
(1.4.10) |
2 |
where the parameters εμν = −ενμ constitute an antisymmetric tensor.
If we focus on the physical relevant case of D = 4, the overall number of Lorentz generators is six, three non-compact and three compact. Specifically we have:

18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Special Relativity: Setting the Stage |
||||||
|
0 1 0 0 |
|
|
0 0 0 |
|
0 |
|
|||||||||
J01 |
= |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
; |
J12 |
= |
0 |
0 |
−1 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 0 1 0 |
|
|
0 0 0 0 |
|
|||||||||||
|
= |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
; |
|
= |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
J02 |
|
0 |
|
J13 |
|
|
(1.4.11) |
|||||||||
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
−1 |
|
||||
|
0 0 0 0 |
|
|
0 1 0 0 |
|
|||||||||||
|
0 0 0 1 |
|
|
0 0 0 0 |
|
|||||||||||
J03 |
= |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
; |
J23 |
= |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
− |
1 |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
The subgroup of the Lorentz group connected to the identity is obtained by exponentiating the matrix M in (1.4.10).
1.4.2 Retrieving Special Lorentz Transformations
Let us consider the transformations generated by the non-compact generators J0i . We can easily show that they are the special Lorentz transformations introduced in (1.2.12). As an example let us exponentiate the generator J01 with a parameter ξ . We obtain:
|
|
|
cosh(ξ ) |
sinh(ξ ) |
0 |
0 |
|
|
||
Λ |
= |
[ |
] = |
sinh(ξ ) |
cosh(ξ ) |
0 |
0 |
|
(1.4.12) |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|||||||
|
exp ξ J01 |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
Applying the matrix Λ to the four-vector of coordinates {ct, x, y, z} we obtain:
|
ct |
ct cosh(ξ ) + x |
||
Λ |
x |
|
= |
x cosh(ξ ) + ct |
|
· |
y |
||
|
y |
|
|
|
|
z |
|
|
z |
sinh(ξ ) |
ct |
|
||
sinh(ξ ) |
|
x |
|
(1.4.13) |
|
≡ y |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
z |
|
|
Now it suffices to identify the parameter ξ , usually named rapidity, with the following combination:
ξ = log |
vc |
+ 1 |
(1.4.14) |
|
|
|
|
1 − vc22
and a straightforward calculation shows that the primed variables defined by (1.4.13) coincide with those spelled out in (1.2.12). Hence the somewhat mysterious Lorentz