- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Classical Physics Between the End of the XIX and the Dawn of the XX Century
- •1.2.1 Maxwell Equations
- •1.2.2 Luminiferous Aether and the Michelson Morley Experiment
- •1.2.3 Maxwell Equations and Lorentz Transformations
- •1.3 The Principle of Special Relativity
- •1.3.1 Minkowski Space
- •1.4 Mathematical Definition of the Lorentz Group
- •1.4.1 The Lorentz Lie Algebra and Its Generators
- •1.4.2 Retrieving Special Lorentz Transformations
- •1.5 Representations of the Lorentz Group
- •1.5.1 The Fundamental Spinor Representation
- •1.6 Lorentz Covariant Field Theories and the Little Group
- •1.8 Criticism of Special Relativity: Opening the Road to General Relativity
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Differentiable Manifolds
- •2.2.1 Homeomorphisms and the Definition of Manifolds
- •2.2.2 Functions on Manifolds
- •2.2.3 Germs of Smooth Functions
- •2.3 Tangent and Cotangent Spaces
- •2.4 Fibre Bundles
- •2.5 Tangent and Cotangent Bundles
- •2.5.1 Sections of a Bundle
- •2.5.2 The Lie Algebra of Vector Fields
- •2.5.3 The Cotangent Bundle and Differential Forms
- •2.5.4 Differential k-Forms
- •2.5.4.1 Exterior Forms
- •2.5.4.2 Exterior Differential Forms
- •2.6 Homotopy, Homology and Cohomology
- •2.6.1 Homotopy
- •2.6.2 Homology
- •2.6.3 Homology and Cohomology Groups: General Construction
- •2.6.4 Relation Between Homotopy and Homology
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 A Historical Outline
- •3.2.1 Gauss Introduces Intrinsic Geometry and Curvilinear Coordinates
- •3.2.3 Parallel Transport and Connections
- •3.2.4 The Metric Connection and Tensor Calculus from Christoffel to Einstein, via Ricci and Levi Civita
- •3.2.5 Mobiles Frames from Frenet and Serret to Cartan
- •3.3 Connections on Principal Bundles: The Mathematical Definition
- •3.3.1 Mathematical Preliminaries on Lie Groups
- •3.3.1.1 Left-/Right-Invariant Vector Fields
- •3.3.1.2 Maurer-Cartan Forms on Lie Group Manifolds
- •3.3.1.3 Maurer Cartan Equations
- •3.3.2 Ehresmann Connections on a Principle Fibre Bundle
- •3.3.2.1 The Connection One-Form
- •Gauge Transformations
- •Horizontal Vector Fields and Covariant Derivatives
- •3.4 Connections on a Vector Bundle
- •3.5 An Illustrative Example of Fibre-Bundle and Connection
- •3.5.1 The Magnetic Monopole and the Hopf Fibration of S3
- •The U(1)-Connection of the Dirac Magnetic Monopole
- •3.6.1 Signatures
- •3.7 The Levi Civita Connection
- •3.7.1 Affine Connections
- •3.7.2 Curvature and Torsion of an Affine Connection
- •Torsion and Torsionless Connections
- •The Levi Civita Metric Connection
- •3.8 Geodesics
- •3.9 Geodesics in Lorentzian and Riemannian Manifolds: Two Simple Examples
- •3.9.1 The Lorentzian Example of dS2
- •3.9.1.1 Null Geodesics
- •3.9.1.2 Time-Like Geodesics
- •3.9.1.3 Space-Like Geodesics
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Keplerian Motions in Newtonian Mechanics
- •4.3 The Orbit Equations of a Massive Particle in Schwarzschild Geometry
- •4.3.1 Extrema of the Effective Potential and Circular Orbits
- •Minimum and Maximum
- •Energy of a Particle in a Circular Orbit
- •4.4 The Periastron Advance of Planets or Stars
- •4.4.1 Perturbative Treatment of the Periastron Advance
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Locally Inertial Frames and the Vielbein Formalism
- •5.2.1 The Vielbein
- •5.2.2 The Spin-Connection
- •5.2.3 The Poincaré Bundle
- •5.3 The Structure of Classical Electrodynamics and Yang-Mills Theories
- •5.3.1 Hodge Duality
- •5.3.2 Geometrical Rewriting of the Gauge Action
- •5.3.3 Yang-Mills Theory in Vielbein Formalism
- •5.4 Soldering of the Lorentz Bundle to the Tangent Bundle
- •5.4.1 Gravitational Coupling of Spinorial Fields
- •5.5 Einstein Field Equations
- •5.6 The Action of Gravity
- •5.6.1 Torsion Equation
- •5.6.1.1 Torsionful Connections
- •The Torsion of Dirac Fields
- •Dilaton Torsion
- •5.6.2 The Einstein Equation
- •5.6.4 Examples of Stress-Energy-Tensors
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of the Yang-Mills Field
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of a Scalar Field
- •5.7 Weak Field Limit of Einstein Equations
- •5.7.1 Gauge Fixing
- •5.7.2 The Spin of the Graviton
- •5.8 The Bottom-Up Approach, or Gravity à la Feynmann
- •5.9 Retrieving the Schwarzschild Metric from Einstein Equations
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction and Historical Outline
- •6.2 The Stress Energy Tensor of a Perfect Fluid
- •6.3 Interior Solutions and the Stellar Equilibrium Equation
- •6.3.1 Integration of the Pressure Equation in the Case of Uniform Density
- •6.3.1.1 Solution in the Newtonian Case
- •6.3.1.2 Integration of the Relativistic Pressure Equation
- •6.3.2 The Central Pressure of a Relativistic Star
- •6.4 The Chandrasekhar Mass-Limit
- •6.4.1.1 Idealized Models of White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars
- •White Dwarfs
- •Neutron Stars
- •6.4.2 The Equilibrium Equation
- •6.4.3 Polytropes and the Chandrasekhar Mass
- •6.5 Conclusive Remarks on Stellar Equilibrium
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.1.1 The Idea of GW Detectors
- •7.1.2 The Arecibo Radio Telescope
- •7.1.2.1 Discovery of the Crab Pulsar
- •7.1.2.2 The 1974 Discovery of the Binary System PSR1913+16
- •7.1.3 The Coalescence of Binaries and the Interferometer Detectors
- •7.2 Green Functions
- •7.2.1 The Laplace Operator and Potential Theory
- •7.2.2 The Relativistic Propagators
- •7.2.2.1 The Retarded Potential
- •7.3 Emission of Gravitational Waves
- •7.3.1 The Stress Energy 3-Form of the Gravitational Field
- •7.3.2 Energy and Momentum of a Plane Gravitational Wave
- •7.3.2.1 Calculation of the Spin Connection
- •7.3.3 Multipolar Expansion of the Perturbation
- •7.3.3.1 Multipolar Expansion
- •7.3.4 Energy Loss by Quadrupole Radiation
- •7.3.4.1 Integration on Solid Angles
- •7.4 Quadruple Radiation from the Binary Pulsar System
- •7.4.1 Keplerian Parameters of a Binary Star System
- •7.4.2 Shrinking of the Orbit and Gravitational Waves
- •7.4.2.1 Calculation of the Moment of Inertia Tensor
- •7.4.3 The Fate of the Binary System
- •7.4.4 The Double Pulsar
- •7.5 Conclusive Remarks on Gravitational Waves
- •References
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Mathematica Packages
- •B.1 Periastropack
- •Programme
- •Main Programme Periastro
- •Subroutine Perihelkep
- •Subroutine Perihelgr
- •Examples
- •B.2 Metrigravpack
- •Metric Gravity
- •Routines: Metrigrav
- •Mainmetric
- •Metricresume
- •Routine Metrigrav
- •Calculation of the Ricci Tensor of the Reissner Nordstrom Metric Using Metrigrav
- •Index
256 |
|
|
|
6 |
Stellar Equilibrium |
|
R |
→ |
9 |
= 2.25 |
(6.3.67) |
|
|
4 |
|||
GM/c2 |
|||||
What does this mean? It means that in order for a star to sustain its own weight when its radius becomes smaller than 2.25 times the Schwarzschild radius, one needs an infinity pressure, namely it is impossible. The star necessarily collapses, all matter falling within the surface r = GMc2 that, as we are going to see in later chapters, is an event horizon. The final equilibrium state reached by the star is that of a black-hole.
6.4 The Chandrasekhar Mass-Limit
The conclusion of the last section raises an important question: is the collapse into a black-hole the necessary end point in the evolution of any star, when all of its energy is exhausted? The answer would be yes if General Relativity had been the only novelty of XXth century Physics. There was, however, another quite relevant novelty: Quantum Mechanics. Together with Quantum Mechanics came also Pauli Exclusion Principle. Precisely this latter is responsible for another source of pressure which, quite unexpectedly, offers a star the last chance to survive in an equilibrium state when all other hopes are already lost. The same principle and the same mathematical modeling actually describes two quite different equilibrium states that correspond to the end-point in the evolution of stars of medium initial size and of much larger size, respectively. The first of this two equilibrium states is that of White Dwarf, while the second is that of Neutron Star. The difference is provided by the nature of the fermions that compose the degenerate Fermi gas filling the star, electrons in the case of white dwarfs neutrons in the second case. The main difference resides in the mass of such fermions, which determines the actual size of the equilibrium radius. Apart from that, the sustaining mechanism is essentially the same in both cases and it can be understood by studying the rather astonishing properties of a completely degenerate gas of an extremely large number of fermionic particles.
6.4.1The Degenerate Fermi Gas of Very Many Spin One-Half Particles
Let us consider a system composed by a very large number N of spin s = 12 free particles. If this system is deprived of energy to allow for their excitations, all particles will fall into the lowest available energy states. Yet, since Pauli exclusion principle forbids that two fermions occupy the same level, they will pile up at increasing energy levels. Taking into account the degeneracy 2 of each level, due to spin 12 , we can write the following equation:
N = d3n (6.4.1)
2
6.4 The Chandrasekhar Mass-Limit |
257 |
where n is the 3-vector of integer wave-numbers labeling a quantum state in a cubic box of size L × L × L. The momentum of such a state is:
p |
2π |
n |
(6.4.2) |
|
|||
−→ = |
L −→ |
|
|
Combining (6.4.1) with (6.4.2) we can write:
N |
= |
|
V |
|
|
d |
3p |
= |
V |
4π pF p2 dp |
|
2 |
(2π )3 |
|
(2π )3 |
||||||||
|
|p|≤pF |
|
|
0 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
= |
|
V |
|
4π |
pF3 |
|
|
|
|
(6.4.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
(2π )3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
||||
where V = L3 denotes the volume of the box surrounding the fermion system. If we introduce the fermion density:
N |
|
ρf = V |
(6.4.4) |
from (6.4.3) we obtain the following expression for the Fermi momentum pF :
pF = 3π 2ρf 1/3 |
(6.4.5) |
Next we calculate the ground state energy of a system of relativistic spin one-half particles near the Fermi temperature. Naming mf the mass of these particles, by definition we obtain:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E0 |
= |
2 |
|
|
|
−→ |
|
+ |
mf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
p |
p |
|
|
p 2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|−→|≤ F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
8π cV |
pF p2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
= |
|
|
|
|
p2 |
+ |
m2 c2 dp |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(2π )3 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
= |
|
cV |
mf c pF p2 |
5 |
1 |
+ |
|
|
p |
2 dp |
(6.4.6) |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
π 2 3 |
mf c |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Let us now define the new variable x = |
|
|
p |
. Using this notation we obtain the |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mf c |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
following expression for the ground state energy: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
V |
c5m4 |
xF x2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
E0 |
= |
|
1 |
+ |
x2 dx |
(6.4.7) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
π 2 3 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
f |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Hence: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E0 |
= |
c5mf4 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.4.8) |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f (xF ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
N |
π 2 3 |
ρ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
