- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Classical Physics Between the End of the XIX and the Dawn of the XX Century
- •1.2.1 Maxwell Equations
- •1.2.2 Luminiferous Aether and the Michelson Morley Experiment
- •1.2.3 Maxwell Equations and Lorentz Transformations
- •1.3 The Principle of Special Relativity
- •1.3.1 Minkowski Space
- •1.4 Mathematical Definition of the Lorentz Group
- •1.4.1 The Lorentz Lie Algebra and Its Generators
- •1.4.2 Retrieving Special Lorentz Transformations
- •1.5 Representations of the Lorentz Group
- •1.5.1 The Fundamental Spinor Representation
- •1.6 Lorentz Covariant Field Theories and the Little Group
- •1.8 Criticism of Special Relativity: Opening the Road to General Relativity
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Differentiable Manifolds
- •2.2.1 Homeomorphisms and the Definition of Manifolds
- •2.2.2 Functions on Manifolds
- •2.2.3 Germs of Smooth Functions
- •2.3 Tangent and Cotangent Spaces
- •2.4 Fibre Bundles
- •2.5 Tangent and Cotangent Bundles
- •2.5.1 Sections of a Bundle
- •2.5.2 The Lie Algebra of Vector Fields
- •2.5.3 The Cotangent Bundle and Differential Forms
- •2.5.4 Differential k-Forms
- •2.5.4.1 Exterior Forms
- •2.5.4.2 Exterior Differential Forms
- •2.6 Homotopy, Homology and Cohomology
- •2.6.1 Homotopy
- •2.6.2 Homology
- •2.6.3 Homology and Cohomology Groups: General Construction
- •2.6.4 Relation Between Homotopy and Homology
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 A Historical Outline
- •3.2.1 Gauss Introduces Intrinsic Geometry and Curvilinear Coordinates
- •3.2.3 Parallel Transport and Connections
- •3.2.4 The Metric Connection and Tensor Calculus from Christoffel to Einstein, via Ricci and Levi Civita
- •3.2.5 Mobiles Frames from Frenet and Serret to Cartan
- •3.3 Connections on Principal Bundles: The Mathematical Definition
- •3.3.1 Mathematical Preliminaries on Lie Groups
- •3.3.1.1 Left-/Right-Invariant Vector Fields
- •3.3.1.2 Maurer-Cartan Forms on Lie Group Manifolds
- •3.3.1.3 Maurer Cartan Equations
- •3.3.2 Ehresmann Connections on a Principle Fibre Bundle
- •3.3.2.1 The Connection One-Form
- •Gauge Transformations
- •Horizontal Vector Fields and Covariant Derivatives
- •3.4 Connections on a Vector Bundle
- •3.5 An Illustrative Example of Fibre-Bundle and Connection
- •3.5.1 The Magnetic Monopole and the Hopf Fibration of S3
- •The U(1)-Connection of the Dirac Magnetic Monopole
- •3.6.1 Signatures
- •3.7 The Levi Civita Connection
- •3.7.1 Affine Connections
- •3.7.2 Curvature and Torsion of an Affine Connection
- •Torsion and Torsionless Connections
- •The Levi Civita Metric Connection
- •3.8 Geodesics
- •3.9 Geodesics in Lorentzian and Riemannian Manifolds: Two Simple Examples
- •3.9.1 The Lorentzian Example of dS2
- •3.9.1.1 Null Geodesics
- •3.9.1.2 Time-Like Geodesics
- •3.9.1.3 Space-Like Geodesics
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Keplerian Motions in Newtonian Mechanics
- •4.3 The Orbit Equations of a Massive Particle in Schwarzschild Geometry
- •4.3.1 Extrema of the Effective Potential and Circular Orbits
- •Minimum and Maximum
- •Energy of a Particle in a Circular Orbit
- •4.4 The Periastron Advance of Planets or Stars
- •4.4.1 Perturbative Treatment of the Periastron Advance
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Locally Inertial Frames and the Vielbein Formalism
- •5.2.1 The Vielbein
- •5.2.2 The Spin-Connection
- •5.2.3 The Poincaré Bundle
- •5.3 The Structure of Classical Electrodynamics and Yang-Mills Theories
- •5.3.1 Hodge Duality
- •5.3.2 Geometrical Rewriting of the Gauge Action
- •5.3.3 Yang-Mills Theory in Vielbein Formalism
- •5.4 Soldering of the Lorentz Bundle to the Tangent Bundle
- •5.4.1 Gravitational Coupling of Spinorial Fields
- •5.5 Einstein Field Equations
- •5.6 The Action of Gravity
- •5.6.1 Torsion Equation
- •5.6.1.1 Torsionful Connections
- •The Torsion of Dirac Fields
- •Dilaton Torsion
- •5.6.2 The Einstein Equation
- •5.6.4 Examples of Stress-Energy-Tensors
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of the Yang-Mills Field
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of a Scalar Field
- •5.7 Weak Field Limit of Einstein Equations
- •5.7.1 Gauge Fixing
- •5.7.2 The Spin of the Graviton
- •5.8 The Bottom-Up Approach, or Gravity à la Feynmann
- •5.9 Retrieving the Schwarzschild Metric from Einstein Equations
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction and Historical Outline
- •6.2 The Stress Energy Tensor of a Perfect Fluid
- •6.3 Interior Solutions and the Stellar Equilibrium Equation
- •6.3.1 Integration of the Pressure Equation in the Case of Uniform Density
- •6.3.1.1 Solution in the Newtonian Case
- •6.3.1.2 Integration of the Relativistic Pressure Equation
- •6.3.2 The Central Pressure of a Relativistic Star
- •6.4 The Chandrasekhar Mass-Limit
- •6.4.1.1 Idealized Models of White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars
- •White Dwarfs
- •Neutron Stars
- •6.4.2 The Equilibrium Equation
- •6.4.3 Polytropes and the Chandrasekhar Mass
- •6.5 Conclusive Remarks on Stellar Equilibrium
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.1.1 The Idea of GW Detectors
- •7.1.2 The Arecibo Radio Telescope
- •7.1.2.1 Discovery of the Crab Pulsar
- •7.1.2.2 The 1974 Discovery of the Binary System PSR1913+16
- •7.1.3 The Coalescence of Binaries and the Interferometer Detectors
- •7.2 Green Functions
- •7.2.1 The Laplace Operator and Potential Theory
- •7.2.2 The Relativistic Propagators
- •7.2.2.1 The Retarded Potential
- •7.3 Emission of Gravitational Waves
- •7.3.1 The Stress Energy 3-Form of the Gravitational Field
- •7.3.2 Energy and Momentum of a Plane Gravitational Wave
- •7.3.2.1 Calculation of the Spin Connection
- •7.3.3 Multipolar Expansion of the Perturbation
- •7.3.3.1 Multipolar Expansion
- •7.3.4 Energy Loss by Quadrupole Radiation
- •7.3.4.1 Integration on Solid Angles
- •7.4 Quadruple Radiation from the Binary Pulsar System
- •7.4.1 Keplerian Parameters of a Binary Star System
- •7.4.2 Shrinking of the Orbit and Gravitational Waves
- •7.4.2.1 Calculation of the Moment of Inertia Tensor
- •7.4.3 The Fate of the Binary System
- •7.4.4 The Double Pulsar
- •7.5 Conclusive Remarks on Gravitational Waves
- •References
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Mathematica Packages
- •B.1 Periastropack
- •Programme
- •Main Programme Periastro
- •Subroutine Perihelkep
- •Subroutine Perihelgr
- •Examples
- •B.2 Metrigravpack
- •Metric Gravity
- •Routines: Metrigrav
- •Mainmetric
- •Metricresume
- •Routine Metrigrav
- •Calculation of the Ricci Tensor of the Reissner Nordstrom Metric Using Metrigrav
- •Index
5.6 The Action of Gravity |
215 |
0 = (m − 3)! × 3! × Tabt + 2δ[ta Tb] |
(5.6.12) |
where the symbols denotes saturation of the corresponding indices. Taking a further trace of (5.6.12) we obtain Ta = 0 which, inserted back into the equation, implies the full vanishing of the torsion Tbca = 0. Hence the soldering of the Lorentz bundle with the tangent bundle is no longer an a priori hypothesis, rather a dynamical yield of the classical action principle.
5.6.1.1 Torsionful Connections
Let us now suppose that in dimension m, in addition to the action of pure gravity we have also a contribution from matter, so that the total action is of the form:
Atot |
= |
|
Lgrav(E, ω) |
+ |
Lmatter(E, ω, Φ) |
(5.6.13) |
|
|
where Φ collectively denotes the non-gravitational matter fields. Necessarily the variation with respect to δωab of the matter Lagrangian Lmatter(E, ω, Φ) produces an (m − 1)-form with the following general structure:
δLmatter |
f |
|
E 1 · · · E m−1 |
|
|
= Kab |
εf 1... m−1 |
(5.6.14) |
|
δωab |
The three index tensor Kabf (Φ, D Φ) depends on the matter fields and possibly on their derivatives. In this case, the torsion tensor is not zero, rather it has a very simple expression in terms of Kabf (Φ, D Φ):
T t |
(Φ, D Φ) |
= − |
(m |
− |
1)(m |
− |
2) Kt |
+ m |
2 δt |
K |
|
|
(5.6.15) |
|
ab |
|
|
|
ab |
− |
2 [a |
|
b] |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In presence of torsion, the spin-connection ωab is modified in the following way:
ω |
ab |
ab |
(E, ∂E) + Δω |
ab |
(ΦD Φ) |
(5.6.16) |
|
= 2ω |
|
where 2ωab(E, ∂E), that depends only the vielbein and its derivatives, is the Levi Civita part of the spin connection, while Δωab(ΦD Φ), depending on the matter fields and their derivatives, is the following one:
Δωab = 2ηq[a Tqpb] − ηaf ηbg ηmpTfmg Ep |
(5.6.17) |
Substituting (5.6.16) and (5.6.17) back into the action, we obtain new non-linear interactions of the matter fields that are actually a gravitational effect.
216 |
5 Einstein Versus Yang-Mills Field Equations |
The Torsion of Dirac Fields The simplest example is provided by the case of a spin 12 -field. Adding to the gravitational action the spinor action (5.4.23) the tensor
Kabf is immediately calculated:
Kf |
= − |
i |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
γ f γabψ |
+ |
2 |
2 |
δf |
|
|
γb γ |
ψ |
(5.6.18) |
|||
|
|
|
ψ |
ψγ |
|||||||||||||||||
4(m |
|
3) |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
ab |
|
− |
! |
|
|
|
|
m |
− |
2 |
[a |
|
|
] |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and for the torsion we find:
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tabf |
= −i |
|
|
|
ψγ f γabψ + 2ηf [a ψγ b] |
ψ |
(5.6.19) |
|||||
4(m |
− |
3) |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Via (5.6.17), this spinor bilinear form of the torsion induces quartic interaction of the Fermi fields that are a consequence of Einstein gravity.
Dilaton Torsion Another notable example of torsion mechanism is provided by the case where we have a dilaton coupling of the Einstein action. Suppose that in addition to the vielbein and the spin connection we have also a scalar field ϕ and that the total action takes the following form:
Atot = |
exp[−aϕ]Ra1a2 [ω] Ea2 Ea3 · · · Eam εa1...am + Ascalar |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dilaton gravity |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6.20) |
Ascalar |
|
1 |
|
|
Φa1 dϕ |
|
Ea2 |
· · · |
Eam εa ...am |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
= m |
! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
ΦmΦm |
|
|
1 |
W (ϕ) Ea1 |
|
Eam εa |
...am (5.6.21) |
|||||
|
|
+ m |
|
2m |
|
|
· · · |
|||||||||||||
|
|
! |
− |
|
|
− m |
|
1 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As defined in (5.6.21), the scalar action Ascalar plays, for the Klein-Gordon action of a scalar field ϕ, the same role that is played by (5.3.35) for the Yang-Mills field, namely its is its transcription in the vielbein formalism without the use of any Hodge dual. Indeed, if we consider the 0-form Φa , which belongs to the vector representation of the Lorentz group, as an independent field and we vary Ascalar with respect to it, we obtain the following algebraic condition:
Φa = ∂a ϕ |
(5.6.22) |
where, by definition, dϕ = ∂a ϕEa . Substituting this result back into (5.6.21) we obtain:
|
→ |
|
= m |
|
|
2 |
|
− |
|
|
− |
|
|
|
Ascalar |
|
AKG |
1 |
|
|
1 |
∂μϕ∂ν ϕgμν |
|
W (ϕ) |
|
|
det g |
dmx |
(5.6.23) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
which is the standard form for the action of a scalar field, with potential W (ϕ), in the background of a metric field gμν .