- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Classical Physics Between the End of the XIX and the Dawn of the XX Century
- •1.2.1 Maxwell Equations
- •1.2.2 Luminiferous Aether and the Michelson Morley Experiment
- •1.2.3 Maxwell Equations and Lorentz Transformations
- •1.3 The Principle of Special Relativity
- •1.3.1 Minkowski Space
- •1.4 Mathematical Definition of the Lorentz Group
- •1.4.1 The Lorentz Lie Algebra and Its Generators
- •1.4.2 Retrieving Special Lorentz Transformations
- •1.5 Representations of the Lorentz Group
- •1.5.1 The Fundamental Spinor Representation
- •1.6 Lorentz Covariant Field Theories and the Little Group
- •1.8 Criticism of Special Relativity: Opening the Road to General Relativity
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Differentiable Manifolds
- •2.2.1 Homeomorphisms and the Definition of Manifolds
- •2.2.2 Functions on Manifolds
- •2.2.3 Germs of Smooth Functions
- •2.3 Tangent and Cotangent Spaces
- •2.4 Fibre Bundles
- •2.5 Tangent and Cotangent Bundles
- •2.5.1 Sections of a Bundle
- •2.5.2 The Lie Algebra of Vector Fields
- •2.5.3 The Cotangent Bundle and Differential Forms
- •2.5.4 Differential k-Forms
- •2.5.4.1 Exterior Forms
- •2.5.4.2 Exterior Differential Forms
- •2.6 Homotopy, Homology and Cohomology
- •2.6.1 Homotopy
- •2.6.2 Homology
- •2.6.3 Homology and Cohomology Groups: General Construction
- •2.6.4 Relation Between Homotopy and Homology
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 A Historical Outline
- •3.2.1 Gauss Introduces Intrinsic Geometry and Curvilinear Coordinates
- •3.2.3 Parallel Transport and Connections
- •3.2.4 The Metric Connection and Tensor Calculus from Christoffel to Einstein, via Ricci and Levi Civita
- •3.2.5 Mobiles Frames from Frenet and Serret to Cartan
- •3.3 Connections on Principal Bundles: The Mathematical Definition
- •3.3.1 Mathematical Preliminaries on Lie Groups
- •3.3.1.1 Left-/Right-Invariant Vector Fields
- •3.3.1.2 Maurer-Cartan Forms on Lie Group Manifolds
- •3.3.1.3 Maurer Cartan Equations
- •3.3.2 Ehresmann Connections on a Principle Fibre Bundle
- •3.3.2.1 The Connection One-Form
- •Gauge Transformations
- •Horizontal Vector Fields and Covariant Derivatives
- •3.4 Connections on a Vector Bundle
- •3.5 An Illustrative Example of Fibre-Bundle and Connection
- •3.5.1 The Magnetic Monopole and the Hopf Fibration of S3
- •The U(1)-Connection of the Dirac Magnetic Monopole
- •3.6.1 Signatures
- •3.7 The Levi Civita Connection
- •3.7.1 Affine Connections
- •3.7.2 Curvature and Torsion of an Affine Connection
- •Torsion and Torsionless Connections
- •The Levi Civita Metric Connection
- •3.8 Geodesics
- •3.9 Geodesics in Lorentzian and Riemannian Manifolds: Two Simple Examples
- •3.9.1 The Lorentzian Example of dS2
- •3.9.1.1 Null Geodesics
- •3.9.1.2 Time-Like Geodesics
- •3.9.1.3 Space-Like Geodesics
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Keplerian Motions in Newtonian Mechanics
- •4.3 The Orbit Equations of a Massive Particle in Schwarzschild Geometry
- •4.3.1 Extrema of the Effective Potential and Circular Orbits
- •Minimum and Maximum
- •Energy of a Particle in a Circular Orbit
- •4.4 The Periastron Advance of Planets or Stars
- •4.4.1 Perturbative Treatment of the Periastron Advance
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Locally Inertial Frames and the Vielbein Formalism
- •5.2.1 The Vielbein
- •5.2.2 The Spin-Connection
- •5.2.3 The Poincaré Bundle
- •5.3 The Structure of Classical Electrodynamics and Yang-Mills Theories
- •5.3.1 Hodge Duality
- •5.3.2 Geometrical Rewriting of the Gauge Action
- •5.3.3 Yang-Mills Theory in Vielbein Formalism
- •5.4 Soldering of the Lorentz Bundle to the Tangent Bundle
- •5.4.1 Gravitational Coupling of Spinorial Fields
- •5.5 Einstein Field Equations
- •5.6 The Action of Gravity
- •5.6.1 Torsion Equation
- •5.6.1.1 Torsionful Connections
- •The Torsion of Dirac Fields
- •Dilaton Torsion
- •5.6.2 The Einstein Equation
- •5.6.4 Examples of Stress-Energy-Tensors
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of the Yang-Mills Field
- •The Stress-Energy Tensor of a Scalar Field
- •5.7 Weak Field Limit of Einstein Equations
- •5.7.1 Gauge Fixing
- •5.7.2 The Spin of the Graviton
- •5.8 The Bottom-Up Approach, or Gravity à la Feynmann
- •5.9 Retrieving the Schwarzschild Metric from Einstein Equations
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction and Historical Outline
- •6.2 The Stress Energy Tensor of a Perfect Fluid
- •6.3 Interior Solutions and the Stellar Equilibrium Equation
- •6.3.1 Integration of the Pressure Equation in the Case of Uniform Density
- •6.3.1.1 Solution in the Newtonian Case
- •6.3.1.2 Integration of the Relativistic Pressure Equation
- •6.3.2 The Central Pressure of a Relativistic Star
- •6.4 The Chandrasekhar Mass-Limit
- •6.4.1.1 Idealized Models of White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars
- •White Dwarfs
- •Neutron Stars
- •6.4.2 The Equilibrium Equation
- •6.4.3 Polytropes and the Chandrasekhar Mass
- •6.5 Conclusive Remarks on Stellar Equilibrium
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.1.1 The Idea of GW Detectors
- •7.1.2 The Arecibo Radio Telescope
- •7.1.2.1 Discovery of the Crab Pulsar
- •7.1.2.2 The 1974 Discovery of the Binary System PSR1913+16
- •7.1.3 The Coalescence of Binaries and the Interferometer Detectors
- •7.2 Green Functions
- •7.2.1 The Laplace Operator and Potential Theory
- •7.2.2 The Relativistic Propagators
- •7.2.2.1 The Retarded Potential
- •7.3 Emission of Gravitational Waves
- •7.3.1 The Stress Energy 3-Form of the Gravitational Field
- •7.3.2 Energy and Momentum of a Plane Gravitational Wave
- •7.3.2.1 Calculation of the Spin Connection
- •7.3.3 Multipolar Expansion of the Perturbation
- •7.3.3.1 Multipolar Expansion
- •7.3.4 Energy Loss by Quadrupole Radiation
- •7.3.4.1 Integration on Solid Angles
- •7.4 Quadruple Radiation from the Binary Pulsar System
- •7.4.1 Keplerian Parameters of a Binary Star System
- •7.4.2 Shrinking of the Orbit and Gravitational Waves
- •7.4.2.1 Calculation of the Moment of Inertia Tensor
- •7.4.3 The Fate of the Binary System
- •7.4.4 The Double Pulsar
- •7.5 Conclusive Remarks on Gravitational Waves
- •References
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Mathematica Packages
- •B.1 Periastropack
- •Programme
- •Main Programme Periastro
- •Subroutine Perihelkep
- •Subroutine Perihelgr
- •Examples
- •B.2 Metrigravpack
- •Metric Gravity
- •Routines: Metrigrav
- •Mainmetric
- •Metricresume
- •Routine Metrigrav
- •Calculation of the Ricci Tensor of the Reissner Nordstrom Metric Using Metrigrav
- •Index
36 2 Manifolds and Fibre Bundles
2.2 Differentiable Manifolds
First and most fundamental in the list of geometrical concepts we need to introduce is that of a manifold which corresponds, as we already explained, to our intuitive idea of a continuous space. In mathematical terms this is, to begin with, a topological space, namely a set of elements where one can define the notion of neighborhood and limit. This is the correct mathematical description of our intuitive ideas of vicinity and close-by points. Secondly the characterizing feature that distinguishes a manifold from a simple topological space is the possibility of labeling its points with a set of coordinates. Coordinates are a set of real numbers x1(p), . . . , xD (p) R associated with each point p M that tell us where we are. Actually in General Relativity each point is an event so that coordinates specify not only its where but also its when. In other applications the coordinates of a point can be the most disparate parameters specifying the state of some complex system of the most general kind (dynamical, biological, economical or whatever).
In classical physics the laws of motion are formulated as a set of differential equations of the second order where the unknown functions are the three Cartesian coordinates x, y, z of a particle and the variable t is time. Solving the dynamical problem amounts to determine the continuous functions x(t), y(t), z(t), that yield a parametric description of a curve in R3 or better define a curve in R4, having included the time t in the list of coordinates of each event. Coordinates, however, are not uniquely defined. Each observer has its own way of labeling space points and the laws of motion take a different form if expressed in the coordinate frame of different observers. There is however a privileged class of observers in whose frames the laws of motion have always the same form: these are the inertial frames, that are in rectilinear relative motion with constant velocity. The existence of a privileged class of inertial frames is common to classical Newtonian physics and to Special Relativity: the only difference is the form of coordinate transformations connecting them, Galileo transformations in the first case and Lorentz transformations in the second. This goes hand in hand with the fact that the space-time manifold is the flat affine1 manifold R4 in both cases. By definition all points of RN can be covered by one coordinate frame {xi } and all frames with such a property are related to each other by general linear transformations, that is by the elements of the general linear
group GL(N, R): |
|
xi = Aij xj ; Aij GL(N, R) |
(2.2.1) |
The restriction to the Galilei or Lorentz subgroups of GL(4, R) is a consequence of the different scalar product on R4 vectors one wants to preserve in the two cases, but the relevant common feature is the fact that the space-time manifold has a vectorspace structure. The privileged coordinate frames are those that use the corresponding vectors as labels of each point.
A different situation arises when the space-time manifold is not flat, like, for instance, the surface of a hypersphere SN . As chartographers know very well there
1A manifold (defined in this section) is named affine when it is also a vector space.
2.2 Differentiable Manifolds |
37 |
is no way of representing all points of a curved surface in a single coordinate frame, namely in a single chart. However we can succeed in representing all points of a curved surface by means of an atlas, namely by a collection of charts, each of which maps one open region of the surface and such that the union of all these regions covers the entire surface. Knowing the transition rule from one chart to the next one, in the regions where they overlap, we obtain a complete coordinate description of the curved surface by means of our atlas.
The intuitive idea of an atlas of open charts, suitably reformulated in mathematical terms, provides the very definition of a differentiable manifold, the geometrical concept that generalizes our notion of space-time, from RN to more complicated non-flat situations.
There are many possible atlases that describe the same manifold M , related to each other by more or less complicated transformations. For a generic M no privileged choice of the atlas is available differently from the case of RN : here the inertial frames are singled out by the additional vector space structure of the manifold, which allows to label each point with the corresponding vector. Therefore if the laws of physics have to be universal and have to accommodate non-flat spacetimes, then they must be formulated in such a way that they have the same form in whatsoever atlas. This is the principle of general covariance at the basis of General Relativity: all observers see the same laws of physics.
Similarly, in a wider perspective, the choice of a particular set of parameters to describe the state of a complex system should not be privileged with respect to any other choice. The laws that govern the dynamics of a system should be intrinsic and should not depend on the set of variables chosen to describe it.
2.2.1 Homeomorphisms and the Definition of Manifolds
A fundamental ingredient in formulating the notion of differential manifolds is that of homeomorphism.2
Definition 2.2.1 Let X and Y be two topological spaces and let h be a map:
h : X → Y |
(2.2.2) |
If h is one-to-one and if both h and its inverse h−1 are continuous, then we say that h is a homeomorphism.
As a consequence of the theorems proved in all textbooks about elementary topology and calculus, homeomorphisms preserve all topological properties. Indeed let h be a homeomorphism mapping X onto Y and let A X be an open subset: its
2We assume that the reader possesses the basic notions of general topology concerning the notions of bases of neighborhoods, open and close subsets, boundary and limit.
38 |
2 Manifolds and Fibre Bundles |
image through h, namely h(A) Y is also an open subset in the topology of Y . Similarly the image h(C) Y of a closed subset C X is a closed subset. Furthermore for all A X we have:
|
|
|
|
|
h(A) |
= h(A) |
(2.2.3) |
||
namely the closure of the image of a set A coincides with the image of the closure.
Definition 2.2.2 Let X and Y be two topological spaces. If there exists a homeomorphism h : X → Y then we say that X and Y are homeomorphic.
It is easy to see that given a topological space X, the set of all homeomorphisms h : X → X constitutes a group, usually denoted Hom(X). Indeed if h Hom(X) is a homeomorphism, then also h−1 Hom(X) is a homeomorphism. Furthermore if h Hom(X) and h Hom(X) then also h ◦ h Hom(X). Finally the identity map:
1 : X → X |
(2.2.4) |
is certainly one-to-one and continuous and it coincides with its own inverse. Hence 1 Hom(X). As we discuss later on, for any manifold X the group Hom(X) is an example of an infinite and continuous group.
Let now M be a topological Hausdorff space. An open chart of M is a pair
(U, ϕ) where U m M is an open subset of M and ϕ is a homeomorphism of U on |
||
an open subset R |
(m being a positive integer). The concept of open chart allows to |
|
|
the coordinates of |
|
introduce the notion of coordinates for all points p U . Indeed m |
|
|
p are the m real numbers that identify the point ϕ(p) ϕ(U ) R |
. |
|
Using the notion of open chart we can finally introduce the notion of differentiable structure.
Definition 2.2.3 Let M be a topological Hausdorff space. A differentiable structure
of dimension m on M is an atlas A = i A(Ui , ϕi ) of open charts (Ui , ϕi ) where |
|
i A, Ui M is an open subset and |
|
ϕi : Ui → ϕi (Ui ) Rm |
(2.2.5) |
is a homeomorphism of Ui in Rm, namely a continuous, invertible map onto an open subset of Rm such that the inverse map
i |
: |
i |
i |
) |
→ |
U |
i M |
(2.2.6) |
ϕ−1 |
|
ϕ |
(U |
|
|
is also continuous (see Fig. 2.1). The atlas must fulfill the following axioms:
M1 It covers M , namely
!
Ui = M |
(2.2.7) |
i
so that each point of M is contained at least in one chart and generically in more than one: p M → (Ui , ϕi )/p Ui .
2.2 Differentiable Manifolds |
39 |
Fig. 2.1 An open chart is a homeomorphism of an open subset Ui of the manifold M onto an open subset of Rm
Fig. 2.2 A transition function between two open charts is a differentiable map from an open subset of Rm to another open subset of the same
M2 Chosen any two charts (Ui , ϕi ), (Uj , ϕj ) such that Ui " Uj = |
, on the inter- |
|||||
section |
|
|
|
|
Uij def Ui # Uj |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
there exist two homeomorphisms: |
|
|||||
|
|
ϕi |Uij |
: Uij → ϕi (Uij ) Rm |
(2.2.9) |
||
|
|
ϕj |Uij : Uij → ϕj (Uij ) Rm |
|
|||
and the composite map: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ψ |
|
def |
ϕ |
j ◦ |
ϕ−1 |
|
|
ij |
= |
|
i |
(2.2.10) |
|
ψij : ϕi (Uij ) Rm → ϕj (Uij ) Rm |
|
|||||
named the transition function which is actually an m-tuplet of m real functions of m real variables is requested to be differentiable (see Fig. 2.2).
M3 The collection (Ui , ϕi )i A is the maximal family of open charts for which both M1 and M2 hold true.
Next we can finally introduce the definition of differentiable manifold.
Definition 2.2.4 A differentiable manifold of dimension m is a topological space M that admits at least one differentiable structure (Ui , ϕi )i A of dimension m.
The definition of a differentiable manifold is constructive in the sense that it provides a way to construct it explicitly. What one has to do is to give an atlas of
40 |
2 Manifolds and Fibre Bundles |
open charts (Ui , ϕi ) and the corresponding transition functions ψij which should satisfy the necessary consistency conditions:
|
i, j |
ψ |
ij = |
ψ |
−1 |
(2.2.11) |
|
|
|
j i |
|
||
i, j, k |
ψij ◦ ψj k ◦ ψki = 1 |
(2.2.12) |
||||
In other words a general recipe to construct a manifold is to specify the open charts and how they are glued together. The properties assigned to a manifold are the properties fulfilled by its transition functions. In particular we have:
Definition 2.2.5 A differentiable manifold M is said to be smooth if the transition functions (2.2.10) are infinitely differentiable
M is smooth ψij C∞ Rm |
(2.2.13) |
Similarly one has the definition of a complex manifold.
Definition 2.2.6 A real manifold of even dimension m = 2ν is complex of dimension ν if the 2ν real coordinates in each open chart Ui can be arranged into ν complex numbers so that (2.2.5) can be replaced by
ϕi : Ui → ϕi (Ui ) Cν |
(2.2.14) |
and the transition functions ψij are holomorphic maps: |
|
ψij : ϕi (Uij ) Cν → ϕj (Uij ) Cν |
(2.2.15) |
Although the constructive definition of a differentiable manifold is always in terms of an atlas, in many occurrences we can have other intrinsic global definitions of what M is and the construction of an atlas of coordinate patches is an a posteriori operation. Typically this happens when the manifold admits a description as an algebraic locus. The prototype example is provided by the SN sphere which can be defined as the locus in RN +1 of points with distance r from the origin:
|
N +1 |
|
{Xi } SN |
Xi2 = r2 |
(2.2.16) |
|
i=1 |
|
In particular for N = 2 we have the familiar S2 which is diffeomorphic to the compactified complex plane C {∞}. Indeed we can easily verify that S2 is a onedimensional complex manifold considering the atlas of holomorphic open charts suggested by the geometrical construction named the stereographic projection. To this effect consider the picture in Fig. 2.3 where we have drawn the two-sphere S2 of radius r = 1 centered in the origin of R3. Given a generic point P S2 we can construct its image on the equatorial plane R2 C drawing the straight line in R3 that goes through P and through the North Pole of the sphere N . Such a line will intersect the equatorial plane in the point PN whose value zN , regarded as a complex
2.2 Differentiable Manifolds |
41 |
Fig. 2.3 Stereographic projection of the two sphere
number, we can identify with the complex coordinate of P in the open chart under consideration:
ϕN (P ) = zN C |
(2.2.17) |
Alternatively we can draw the straight line through P and the South Pole S. This intersects the equatorial plane in another point PS whose value as a complex number, named zS , is just the reciprocal of zN : zS = 1/zN . We can take zS as the complex coordinate of the same point P . In other words we have another open chart:
ϕS (P ) = zS C |
(2.2.18) |
What is the domain of these two charts, namely what are the open subsets UN and US ? This is rather easily established considering that the North Pole projection yields a finite result zN < ∞ for all points P except the North Pole itself. Hence UN S2 is the open set obtained by subtracting one point (the North Pole) to the sphere. Similarly the South Pole projection yields a finite result for all points P except the South Pole itself and US is S2 minus the south pole. More definitely we can choose for UN and US any two open neighborhoods of the South and North Pole respectively with non-vanishing intersection (see Fig. 2.4). In this case the intersection
"
UN US is a band wrapped around the equator of the sphere and its image in the complex equatorial plane is a circular corona that excludes both a circular neighborhood of the origin and a circular neighborhood of infinity. On such an intersection we have the transition function:
1 |
|
ψNS : zN = zS |
(2.2.19) |
which is clearly holomorphic and satisfies the consistency conditions in (2.2.11), (2.2.12). Hence we see that S2 is a complex 1-manifold that can be constructed with an atlas composed of two open charts related by the transition function (2.2.19). Obviously a complex 1-manifold is a fortiori a smooth real 2-manifold. Manifolds with infinitely differentiable transition functions are named smooth not without a reason. Indeed they correspond to our intuitive notion of smooth hypersurfaces without conical points or edges. The presence of such defects manifests itself through the lack of differentiability in some regions.
