- •Preface
- •About the Author
- •About the Book
- •Acknowledgment
- •Contents
- •1.1 Industry Overview
- •1.2 Incentives for Renewables
- •1.3 Utility Perspective
- •1.3.1 Modularity
- •1.3.2 Emission-Free
- •References
- •2.1 Wind in the World
- •2.3 Europe
- •2.4 India
- •2.5 Mexico
- •2.6 Ongoing Research and Development
- •References
- •3.1 Present Status
- •3.2 Building Integrated pv Systems
- •3.3 pv Cell Technologies
- •3.3.2 Polycrystalline and Semicrystalline
- •3.3.3 Thin Films
- •3.3.4 Amorphous Silicon
- •3.3.5 Spheral
- •3.3.6 Concentrated Cells
- •3.4 pv Energy Maps
- •References
- •5.1 System Components
- •5.1.1 Tower
- •5.1.2 Turbine Blades
- •5.1.3 Yaw Control
- •5.1.4 Speed Control
- •5.2 Turbine Rating
- •5.3 Electrical Load Matching
- •5.5 System Design Features
- •5.5.1 Number of Blades
- •5.5.2 Rotor Upwind or Downwind
- •5.5.3 Horizontal Axis Versus Vertical Axis
- •5.5.4 Spacing of the Towers
- •5.6 Maximum Power Operation
- •5.6.2 Peak Power Tracking Scheme
- •5.7 System Control Requirements
- •5.7.1 Speed Control
- •5.7.2 Rate Control
- •5.8 Environmental Aspects
- •5.8.1 Audible Noise
- •5.8.2 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI)
- •References
- •6.1 Electromechanical Energy Conversion
- •6.1.1 DC Machine
- •6.1.2 Synchronous Machine
- •6.1.3 Induction Machine
- •6.2 Induction Generator
- •6.2.1 Construction
- •6.2.2 Working Principle
- •6.2.3 Rotor Speed and Slip
- •6.2.4 Equivalent Circuit for Performance Calculations
- •6.2.8 Transients
- •References
- •7.1 Speed Control Regions
- •7.2 Generator Drives
- •7.3 Drive Selection
- •References
- •8.1 The pv Cell
- •8.2 Module and Array
- •8.3 Equivalent Electrical Circuit
- •8.4 Open Circuit Voltage and Short Circuit Current
- •8.6 Array Design
- •8.6.1 Sun Intensity
- •8.6.2 Sun Angle
- •8.6.3 Shadow Effect
- •8.6.4 Temperature Effect
- •8.6.5 Effect of Climate
- •8.6.6 Electrical Load Matching
- •8.6.7 Sun Tracking
- •8.7 Peak Power Point Operation
- •8.8 pv System Components
- •References
- •9.1 Energy Collection
- •9.1.1 Parabolic Trough
- •9.1.2 Central Receiver
- •9.1.3 Parabolic Dish
- •9.2 Solar II Power Plant
- •9.3 Synchronous Generator
- •9.3.1 Equivalent Electrical Circuit
- •9.3.2 Excitation Methods
- •9.3.3 Electrical Power Output
- •9.3.4 Transient Stability Limit
- •9.4 Commercial Power Plants
1
Introduction
1.1Industry Overview
The total annual primary energy consumption in 1997 was 390 quadrillion (1015) BTUs worldwide1 and over 90 quadrillion BTUs in the United States of America, distributed in segments shown in Figure 1-1. About 40 percent of the total primary energy is used in generating electricity. Nearly 70 percent of the energy used in our homes and offices is in the form of electricity. To meet this demand, 700 GW of electrical generating capacity is now installed in the U.S.A. For most of this century, the U.S. electric demand has increased with the gross national product (GNP). At that rate, the U.S. will need to install additional 200 GW capacity by the year 2010.
The new capacity installation decisions today are becoming complicated in many parts of the world because of difficulty in finding sites for new generation and transmission facilities of any kind. In the U.S.A., no nuclear power plants have been ordered since 19782 (Figure 1-2). Given the potential for cost overruns, safety related design changes during the construction, and local opposition to new plants, most utility executives suggest that none will be ordered in the foreseeable future. Assuming that no new nuclear plants are built, and that the existing plants are not relicensed at the expiration of their 40-year terms, the nuclear power output is expected to decline sharply after 2010. This decline must be replaced by other means. With gas prices expected to rise in the long run, utilities are projected to turn increasingly to coal for base load-power generation. The U.S.A. has enormous reserves of coal, equivalent to more than 250 years of use at current level. However, that will need clean coal burning technologies that are fully acceptable to the public.
An alternative to the nuclear and fossil fuel power is renewable energy technologies (hydro, wind, solar, biomass, geothermal, and ocean). Largescale hydroelectric projects have become increasingly difficult to carry through in recent years because of competing use of land and water. Relicensing requirements of existing hydro plants may even lead to removal of some dams to protect or restore wildlife habitats. Among the other renewable
© 1999 by CRC Press LLC
FIGURE 1-1
Primary energy consumption in the U.S.A. in three major sectors, total 90 quadrillion BTUs in 1997. (From U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, Report No. DE-97005344, April 1997.)
FIGURE 1-2
The stagnant nuclear power capacity worldwide. (From Felix, F., State of the nuclear economy, IEEE Spectrum, November 1997. ©1997 IEEE. With permission.)
power sources, wind and solar have recently experienced a rapid growth around the world. Having wide geographical spread, they can be generated near the load centers, thus simultaneously eliminating the need of high voltage transmission lines running through rural and urban landscapes.
The present status and benefits of the renewable power sources are compared with the conventional ones in Tables 1-1 and 1-2, respectively.
The renewables compare well with the conventionals in economy. Many energy scientists and economists believe that the renewables would get much more federal and state incentives if their social benefits were given full credit.
© 1999 by CRC Press LLC
TABLE 1-1
Status of Conventional and Renewable Power Sources
Conventional |
Renewables |
|
|
Coal, nuclear, oil, and natural gas |
Wind, solar, biomass geothermal, and ocean |
Fully matured technologies |
Rapidly developing technologies |
Numerous tax and investment subsidies |
Some tax credits and grants available from some |
embedded in national economies |
federal and/or state governments |
Accepted in society under the ‘grandfather |
Being accepted on its own merit, even with |
clause’ as necessary evil |
limited valuation of their environmental and |
|
other social benefits |
|
|
TABLE 1-2
Benefits of Using Renewable Electricity
|
Nontraditional Benefits |
Traditional Benefits |
Per Million kWh consumed |
|
|
Monetary value of kWh consumed |
Reduction in emission |
U.S. average 12 cents/kWh |
750–1000 tons of CO2 |
U.K. average 7.5 pence/kWh |
7.5–10 tons of SO2 |
|
3–5 tons of NOx |
|
50,000 kWh reduction in energy loss in power lines and |
|
equipment |
|
Life extension of utility power distribution equipment |
|
Lower capital cost as lower capacity equipment can be |
|
used (such as transformer capacity reduction of 50 kW |
|
per MW installed) |
|
|
For example, the value of not generating one ton of CO2, SO2, and NOx, and the value of not building long high voltage transmission lines through rural and urban areas are not adequately reflected in the present evaluation of the renewables.
1.2Incentives for Renewables
A great deal of renewable energy development in the U.S.A. occurred in the 1980s, and the prime stimulus for it was the passage in 1978 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA). It created a class of nonutility power generators known as the “qualified facilities (QFs)”. The QFs were defined to be small power generators utilizing renewable energy sources and/or cogeneration systems utilizing waste energy. For the first time, PURPA required electric utilities to interconnect with QFs and to purchase QFs’ power generation at “avoided cost”, which the utility would have incurred by generating that power by itself. PURPA also exempted QFs from certain
© 1999 by CRC Press LLC