- •Contents
- •Preface to the second edition
- •Preface to the first edition
- •1 Special relativity
- •1.2 Definition of an inertial observer in SR
- •1.4 Spacetime diagrams
- •1.6 Invariance of the interval
- •1.8 Particularly important results
- •Time dilation
- •Lorentz contraction
- •Conventions
- •Failure of relativity?
- •1.9 The Lorentz transformation
- •1.11 Paradoxes and physical intuition
- •The problem
- •Brief solution
- •2 Vector analysis in special relativity
- •Transformation of basis vectors
- •Inverse transformations
- •2.3 The four-velocity
- •2.4 The four-momentum
- •Conservation of four-momentum
- •Scalar product of two vectors
- •Four-velocity and acceleration as derivatives
- •Energy and momentum
- •2.7 Photons
- •No four-velocity
- •Four-momentum
- •Zero rest-mass particles
- •3 Tensor analysis in special relativity
- •Components of a tensor
- •General properties
- •Notation for derivatives
- •Components
- •Symmetries
- •Circular reasoning?
- •Mixed components of metric
- •Metric and nonmetric vector algebras
- •3.10 Exercises
- •4 Perfect fluids in special relativity
- •The number density n
- •The flux across a surface
- •Number density as a timelike flux
- •The flux across the surface
- •4.4 Dust again: the stress–energy tensor
- •Energy density
- •4.5 General fluids
- •Definition of macroscopic quantities
- •First law of thermodynamics
- •The general stress–energy tensor
- •The spatial components of T, T ij
- •Conservation of energy–momentum
- •Conservation of particles
- •No heat conduction
- •No viscosity
- •Form of T
- •The conservation laws
- •4.8 Gauss’ law
- •4.10 Exercises
- •5 Preface to curvature
- •The gravitational redshift experiment
- •Nonexistence of a Lorentz frame at rest on Earth
- •The principle of equivalence
- •The redshift experiment again
- •Local inertial frames
- •Tidal forces
- •The role of curvature
- •Metric tensor
- •5.3 Tensor calculus in polar coordinates
- •Derivatives of basis vectors
- •Derivatives of general vectors
- •The covariant derivative
- •Divergence and Laplacian
- •5.4 Christoffel symbols and the metric
- •Calculating the Christoffel symbols from the metric
- •5.5 Noncoordinate bases
- •Polar coordinate basis
- •Polar unit basis
- •General remarks on noncoordinate bases
- •Noncoordinate bases in this book
- •5.8 Exercises
- •6 Curved manifolds
- •Differential structure
- •Proof of the local-flatness theorem
- •Geodesics
- •6.5 The curvature tensor
- •Geodesic deviation
- •The Ricci tensor
- •The Einstein tensor
- •6.7 Curvature in perspective
- •7 Physics in a curved spacetime
- •7.2 Physics in slightly curved spacetimes
- •7.3 Curved intuition
- •7.6 Exercises
- •8 The Einstein field equations
- •Geometrized units
- •8.2 Einstein’s equations
- •8.3 Einstein’s equations for weak gravitational fields
- •Nearly Lorentz coordinate systems
- •Gauge transformations
- •Riemann tensor
- •Weak-field Einstein equations
- •Newtonian limit
- •The far field of stationary relativistic sources
- •Definition of the mass of a relativistic body
- •8.5 Further reading
- •9 Gravitational radiation
- •The effect of waves on free particles
- •Measuring the stretching of space
- •Polarization of gravitational waves
- •An exact plane wave
- •9.2 The detection of gravitational waves
- •General considerations
- •Measuring distances with light
- •Beam detectors
- •Interferometer observations
- •9.3 The generation of gravitational waves
- •Simple estimates
- •Slow motion wave generation
- •Exact solution of the wave equation
- •Preview
- •Energy lost by a radiating system
- •Overview
- •Binary systems
- •Spinning neutron stars
- •9.6 Further reading
- •10 Spherical solutions for stars
- •The metric
- •Physical interpretation of metric terms
- •The Einstein tensor
- •Equation of state
- •Equations of motion
- •Einstein equations
- •Schwarzschild metric
- •Generality of the metric
- •10.5 The interior structure of the star
- •The structure of Newtonian stars
- •Buchdahl’s interior solution
- •10.7 Realistic stars and gravitational collapse
- •Buchdahl’s theorem
- •Quantum mechanical pressure
- •White dwarfs
- •Neutron stars
- •10.9 Exercises
- •11 Schwarzschild geometry and black holes
- •Black holes in Newtonian gravity
- •Conserved quantities
- •Perihelion shift
- •Post-Newtonian gravity
- •Gravitational deflection of light
- •Gravitational lensing
- •Coordinate singularities
- •Inside r = 2M
- •Coordinate systems
- •Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates
- •Formation of black holes in general
- •General properties of black holes
- •Kerr black hole
- •Dragging of inertial frames
- •Ergoregion
- •The Kerr horizon
- •Equatorial photon motion in the Kerr metric
- •The Penrose process
- •Supermassive black holes
- •Dynamical black holes
- •11.6 Further reading
- •12 Cosmology
- •The universe in the large
- •The cosmological arena
- •12.2 Cosmological kinematics: observing the expanding universe
- •Homogeneity and isotropy of the universe
- •Models of the universe: the cosmological principle
- •Cosmological metrics
- •Cosmological redshift as a distance measure
- •The universe is accelerating!
- •12.3 Cosmological dynamics: understanding the expanding universe
- •Critical density and the parameters of our universe
- •12.4 Physical cosmology: the evolution of the universe we observe
- •Dark matter and galaxy formation: the universe after decoupling
- •The early universe: fundamental physics meets cosmology
- •12.5 Further reading
- •Appendix A Summary of linear algebra
- •Vector space
- •References
- •Index
2 Vector analysis in special relativity
2.1 D e fi n i t i o n o f a v e c t o r
For the moment we will use the notion of a vector that we carry over from Euclidean geometry, that a vector is something whose components transform as do the coordinates under a coordinate transformation. Later on we shall define vectors in a more satisfactory manner.
The typical vector is the displacement vector, which points from one event to another and has components equal to the coordinate differences:
x → ( t, x, y, z). |
(2.1) |
O
In this line we have introduced several new notations: an arrow over a symbol denotes a vector (so that x is a vector having nothing particular to do with the coordinate x), the arrow after x means ‘has components’, and the O underneath it means ‘in the frame O’; the components will always be in the order t, x, y, z (equivalently, indices in the order 0, 1, 2, 3). The notation →O is used in order to emphasize the distinction between the vector and its components. The vector x is an arrow between two events, while the collection of components is a set of four coordinate-dependent numbers. We shall always emphasize the notion of a vector (and, later, any tensor) as a geometrical object: something which can be defined and (sometimes) visualized without referring to a specific coordinate system. Another important notation is
x → { xα }, |
(2.2) |
O
where by { xα } we mean all of x0, x1, x2, x3. If we ask for this vector’s components in another coordinate system, say the frame O¯ , we write
x → { xα¯ }.
O¯
That is, we put a bar over the index to denote the new coordinates. The vector x is the same, and no new notation is needed for it when the frame is changed. Only the
34 |
Vector analysis in special relativity |
components of it change.1 What are the new components xα¯ ? We get them from the Lorentz transformation:
x0¯ |
= |
x0 |
− |
vx1 |
|
√(1 − v2) |
√(1 − v2) |
, etc. |
Since this is a linear transformation, it can be written
x0¯ |
3 |
β xβ , |
= 0¯ |
||
|
|
|
|
β=0 |
|
¯
where { 0β } are four numbers, one for each value of β. In this case
¯ √ ¯ √
00 = 1/ (1 − v2), 01 = −v/ (1 − v2),
¯ ¯
02 = 03 = 0.
¯
A similar equation holds for x1, and so in general we write
3
xα¯ |
= |
β |
¯ |
(2.3) |
|
α¯ |
xβ , for arbitrary α. |
β=0
Now { α¯ β } is a collection of 16 numbers, which constitutes the Lorentz transformation matrix. The reason we have written one index up and the other down will become clear when we study differential geometry. For now, it enables us to introduce the final bit of notation, the Einstein summation convention: whenever an expression contains one index as a superscript and the same index as a subscript, a summation is implied over all values that index can take. That is,
Aα Bα and Tγ Eγ α
are shorthand for the summations
3 |
3 |
Aα Bα and |
Tγ Eγ α , |
α=0 |
γ =0 |
while
Aα Bβ , Tγ Eβα , and Aβ Aβ
do not represent sums on any index. The Lorentz transformation, Eq. (2.3), can now be abbreviated to
xα¯ = α¯ β xβ , |
(2.4) |
saving some messy writing.
1This is what some books on linear algebra call a ‘passive’ transformation: the coordinates change, but the vector does not.
35 |
2.1 Definition of a vector |
Notice that Eq. (2.4) is identically equal to
xα¯ = α¯ γ xγ .
Since the repeated index (β in one case, γ in the other) merely denotes a summation from 0 to 3, it doesn’t matter what letter is used. Such a summed index is called a dummy index, and relabeling a dummy index (as we have done, replacing β by γ ) is often a useful tool in tensor algebra. There is only one thing we should not replace the dummy index β with: a Latin index. The reason is that Latin indices can (by our convention) only take the values 1, 2, 3, whereas β must be able to equal zero as well. Thus, the expressions
α¯ β xβ and α¯ i xi
are not the same; in fact we have
α¯ β xβ = α¯ 0 x0 + α¯ i xi. |
(2.5) |
Eq. (2.4) is really four different equations, one for each value that α¯ can assume. An index like α¯ , on which no sum is performed, is called a free index. Whenever an equation is written down with one or more free indices, it is valid if and only if it is true for all possible values the free indices can assume. As with a dummy index, the name given to a free index is largely arbitrary. Thus, Eq. (2.4) can be rewritten as
xγ¯ = γ¯ β xβ .
This is equivalent to Eq. (2.4) because γ¯ can assume the same four values that α¯ could assume. If a free index is renamed, it must be renamed everywhere. For example, the following modification of Eq. (2.4),
xγ¯ = α¯ β xβ ,
makes no sense and should never be written. The difference between these last two expressions is that the first guarantees that, whatever value γ¯ assumes, both xγ¯ on the left andγ¯ β on the right will have the same free index. The second expression does not link the indices in this way, so it is not equivalent to Eq. (2.4).
The general vector 2 is defined by a collection of numbers (its components in some frame, say O)
A |
→ |
(A0 |
, A1, A2, A3) |
= { |
Aα |
, |
(2.6) |
|
|
|
} |
|
|
O
and by the rule that its components in a frame |
¯ |
are |
|
|
O |
|
|
Aα¯ = α¯β Aβ . |
(2.7) |
2Such a vector, with four components, is sometimes called a four-vector to distinguish it from the threecomponent vectors we are used to in elementary physics, which we shall call three-vectors. Unless we say
otherwise, a ‘vector’ is always a four-vector. We denote four-vectors by arrows, e.g. A, and three-vectors by boldface, e.g. A.
36 |
|
Vector analysis in special relativity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
That is, its components transform the same way the coordinates do. Remember that a vector can be defined by giving four numbers (e.g. (108, −10−16, 5.8368, π )) in some frame; then its components in all other frames are uniquely determined. Vectors in spacetime obey the
A and B are vectors and μ is a number, then A |
B and μA are also vectors, |
||||||||||||
usual rules: if |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
|
|
|
with components |
+ |
|
→O |
A |
+ (μA0, μA1, μA2 |
, μA3). |
|
|
|
(2.8) |
|||
|
|
+ |
|
||||||||||
|
|
(A0 |
B0, A1 |
+ |
B1, A2 |
+ |
B2, A3 |
B3), |
|
|
|||
A B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
μ → |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thus, vectors add by the usual parallelogram rule. Notice that we can give any four numbers to make a vector, except that if the numbers are not dimensionless, they must all have the same dimensions, since under a transformation they will be added together.
2.2 Ve c t o r a l g e b ra
B asi s ve ctors
In any frame O there are four special vectors, defined by giving their components:
e0 |
→O |
(1, 0, 0, 0), |
|
|
e1 |
(0, 1, 0, 0), |
(2.9) |
||
→ |
|
|
||
|
O |
|
|
|
e |
|
(0, 0, 1, 0), |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
→ |
|
|
|
|
e3 |
O |
|
|
|
→ (0, 0, 0, 1). |
|
|||
|
O |
|
|
|
These definitions define the basis vectors of the frame O. Similarly, O¯ has basis vectors
e0¯ |
→ (1, 0, 0, 0), etc. |
|
¯ |
|
O |
Generally, e0¯ = e0, since they are defined in different frames. The reader should verify that the definition of the basis vectors is equivalent to
(eα )β = δα β . |
(2.10) |
That is, the β component of eα is the Kronocker delta: 1 if β = α and 0 if β =α. Any vector can be expressed in terms of the basis vectors. If
|
|
A |
|
|
0 |
1 |
|
2 |
3 |
), |
|
|
|
→ (A |
, A |
, A |
, A |
|
|||||
then |
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
A |
= |
A0e |
|
|
A1e |
|
A2e |
|
A3e , |
||
|
+ |
|
+ |
|
+ |
|
|||||
|
0 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
3 |
||
|
= |
Aα e |
α |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.11) |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|