- •Contents
- •Preface to the second edition
- •Preface to the first edition
- •1 Special relativity
- •1.2 Definition of an inertial observer in SR
- •1.4 Spacetime diagrams
- •1.6 Invariance of the interval
- •1.8 Particularly important results
- •Time dilation
- •Lorentz contraction
- •Conventions
- •Failure of relativity?
- •1.9 The Lorentz transformation
- •1.11 Paradoxes and physical intuition
- •The problem
- •Brief solution
- •2 Vector analysis in special relativity
- •Transformation of basis vectors
- •Inverse transformations
- •2.3 The four-velocity
- •2.4 The four-momentum
- •Conservation of four-momentum
- •Scalar product of two vectors
- •Four-velocity and acceleration as derivatives
- •Energy and momentum
- •2.7 Photons
- •No four-velocity
- •Four-momentum
- •Zero rest-mass particles
- •3 Tensor analysis in special relativity
- •Components of a tensor
- •General properties
- •Notation for derivatives
- •Components
- •Symmetries
- •Circular reasoning?
- •Mixed components of metric
- •Metric and nonmetric vector algebras
- •3.10 Exercises
- •4 Perfect fluids in special relativity
- •The number density n
- •The flux across a surface
- •Number density as a timelike flux
- •The flux across the surface
- •4.4 Dust again: the stress–energy tensor
- •Energy density
- •4.5 General fluids
- •Definition of macroscopic quantities
- •First law of thermodynamics
- •The general stress–energy tensor
- •The spatial components of T, T ij
- •Conservation of energy–momentum
- •Conservation of particles
- •No heat conduction
- •No viscosity
- •Form of T
- •The conservation laws
- •4.8 Gauss’ law
- •4.10 Exercises
- •5 Preface to curvature
- •The gravitational redshift experiment
- •Nonexistence of a Lorentz frame at rest on Earth
- •The principle of equivalence
- •The redshift experiment again
- •Local inertial frames
- •Tidal forces
- •The role of curvature
- •Metric tensor
- •5.3 Tensor calculus in polar coordinates
- •Derivatives of basis vectors
- •Derivatives of general vectors
- •The covariant derivative
- •Divergence and Laplacian
- •5.4 Christoffel symbols and the metric
- •Calculating the Christoffel symbols from the metric
- •5.5 Noncoordinate bases
- •Polar coordinate basis
- •Polar unit basis
- •General remarks on noncoordinate bases
- •Noncoordinate bases in this book
- •5.8 Exercises
- •6 Curved manifolds
- •Differential structure
- •Proof of the local-flatness theorem
- •Geodesics
- •6.5 The curvature tensor
- •Geodesic deviation
- •The Ricci tensor
- •The Einstein tensor
- •6.7 Curvature in perspective
- •7 Physics in a curved spacetime
- •7.2 Physics in slightly curved spacetimes
- •7.3 Curved intuition
- •7.6 Exercises
- •8 The Einstein field equations
- •Geometrized units
- •8.2 Einstein’s equations
- •8.3 Einstein’s equations for weak gravitational fields
- •Nearly Lorentz coordinate systems
- •Gauge transformations
- •Riemann tensor
- •Weak-field Einstein equations
- •Newtonian limit
- •The far field of stationary relativistic sources
- •Definition of the mass of a relativistic body
- •8.5 Further reading
- •9 Gravitational radiation
- •The effect of waves on free particles
- •Measuring the stretching of space
- •Polarization of gravitational waves
- •An exact plane wave
- •9.2 The detection of gravitational waves
- •General considerations
- •Measuring distances with light
- •Beam detectors
- •Interferometer observations
- •9.3 The generation of gravitational waves
- •Simple estimates
- •Slow motion wave generation
- •Exact solution of the wave equation
- •Preview
- •Energy lost by a radiating system
- •Overview
- •Binary systems
- •Spinning neutron stars
- •9.6 Further reading
- •10 Spherical solutions for stars
- •The metric
- •Physical interpretation of metric terms
- •The Einstein tensor
- •Equation of state
- •Equations of motion
- •Einstein equations
- •Schwarzschild metric
- •Generality of the metric
- •10.5 The interior structure of the star
- •The structure of Newtonian stars
- •Buchdahl’s interior solution
- •10.7 Realistic stars and gravitational collapse
- •Buchdahl’s theorem
- •Quantum mechanical pressure
- •White dwarfs
- •Neutron stars
- •10.9 Exercises
- •11 Schwarzschild geometry and black holes
- •Black holes in Newtonian gravity
- •Conserved quantities
- •Perihelion shift
- •Post-Newtonian gravity
- •Gravitational deflection of light
- •Gravitational lensing
- •Coordinate singularities
- •Inside r = 2M
- •Coordinate systems
- •Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates
- •Formation of black holes in general
- •General properties of black holes
- •Kerr black hole
- •Dragging of inertial frames
- •Ergoregion
- •The Kerr horizon
- •Equatorial photon motion in the Kerr metric
- •The Penrose process
- •Supermassive black holes
- •Dynamical black holes
- •11.6 Further reading
- •12 Cosmology
- •The universe in the large
- •The cosmological arena
- •12.2 Cosmological kinematics: observing the expanding universe
- •Homogeneity and isotropy of the universe
- •Models of the universe: the cosmological principle
- •Cosmological metrics
- •Cosmological redshift as a distance measure
- •The universe is accelerating!
- •12.3 Cosmological dynamics: understanding the expanding universe
- •Critical density and the parameters of our universe
- •12.4 Physical cosmology: the evolution of the universe we observe
- •Dark matter and galaxy formation: the universe after decoupling
- •The early universe: fundamental physics meets cosmology
- •12.5 Further reading
- •Appendix A Summary of linear algebra
- •Vector space
- •References
- •Index
287 |
11.1 |
Trajectories in the Schwarzschild spacetime |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
§ 11.7, we see that for such an orbit the impact parameter (b) is small: it is aimed more |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
directly at the hole than are orbits of smaller E˜ and fixed L˜ . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Of course, if the geometry under consideration is a star, its radius R will exceed 2M, and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
the potential diagrams, Figs. 11.1–11.3, will be valid only outside R. If a particle reaches |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
R, it will hit the star. Depending on R/M, then, only certain kinds of orbits will be possible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perihelion shift |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
A particle (or planet) in a (stable) circular orbit around a star will make one complete |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
orbit and come back to the same point (i.e. same value of φ) in a fixed amount of coordi- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
nate times, which is called its period P. This period can be determined as follows. From |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Eq. (11.17) it follows that a stable circular orbit at radius r has angular momentum |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L˜ |
2 = |
|
|
|
|
Mr |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.20) |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
− |
3M/r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
and since E˜ 2 = V˜ 2 for a circular orbit, it also has energy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2M |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E˜ 2 |
= 1 − |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/ |
1 − |
3 |
. |
|
|
|
(11.21) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r |
|
r |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Now, we have |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
dφ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pφ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pφ |
|
= gφφ L˜ |
|
|
1 |
L˜ |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:= Uφ = |
|
|
|
= gφφ |
|
|
|
= |
|
(11.22) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
dτ |
|
m |
|
m |
|
r2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
dt |
|
|
|
0 |
= |
p0 |
|
|
|
|
|
00 p0 |
|
|
|
00 |
(−E˜ ) = |
|
|
|
|
E˜ |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
:= U |
|
|
|
= g |
|
|
|
|
= g |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
(11.23) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
dτ |
|
m |
|
|
m |
|
1 |
− |
2M/r |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
We obtain the angular velocity by dividing these: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dt |
|
|
|
dt/dτ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
r3 |
|
1/2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.24) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dφ |
dφ/dτ |
|
M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The period, which is the time taken for φ to change by 2π , is |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r3 |
1/2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P = 2π |
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.25) |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is the coordinate time, of course, not the particle’s proper time. (But see Exer. 7, § 11.7: coordinate time is proper time far away.) It happens, coincidentally, that this is identical to the Newtonian expression.
Now, a slightly noncircular orbit will oscillate in and out about a central radius r. In Newtonian gravity the orbit is a perfect ellipse, which means, among other things, that it is closed: after a fixed amount of time it returns to the same point (same r and φ). In GR, this does not happen and a typical orbit is shown in Fig. 11.4. However, when the effects of relativity are small and the orbit is nearly circular, the relativistic orbit must be almost closed: it must look like an ellipse which slowly rotates about the center. One way to describe this is to look at the perihelion of the orbit, the point of closest approach to
288 |
Schwarzschild geometry and black holes |
(a) |
(b) |
Figure 11.4
(c)
(a) A Newtonian orbit is a closed ellipse. Grid marked in units of M. (b) An orbit in the Schwarzschild metric with pericentric and apcentric distances similar to those in (a). Pericenters (heavy dots) advance by about 97◦ per orbit. (c) A moderately more compact orbit than in (b) has a considerably larger pericenter shift, about 130◦.
the star. (‘Peri’ means closest and ‘helion’ refers to the Sun; for orbits about any old star the name ‘periastron’ is more appropriate. For orbits around Earth – ‘geo’ – we speak of the ‘perigee’. These opposite of ‘peri’ is ‘ap’: the furthest distance. Thus, an orbit also has an aphelion, apastron, or apogee, depending on what it is orbiting around. The general terms, not specific to any particular object, are perapsis and apapsis.) The perihelion will rotate around the star in some manner, and observers can hope to measure this. It has been measured for Mercury to be 43 /century, and we must try to calculate it. Note that all other planets are further from the Sun and therefore under the influence of significantly smaller relativistic corrections to Newtonian gravity. The measurement of Mercury’s precession is a herculean task, first accomplished in the 1800s. Due to various other effects, such as the perturbations of Mercury’s orbit due to the other planets, the observed precession is about 5600 /century. The 43 is only the part not explainable by Newtonian gravity, and Einstein’s demonstration that his theory predicts exactly that amount was the first evidence in favor of the theory.
289 |
|
11.1 Trajectories in the Schwarzschild spacetime |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To calculate the precession, let us begin by getting an equation for the particle’s orbit. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We have dr/dτ from Eq. (11.11). We get dφ/dτ from Eq. (11.22) and divide to get |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
dr |
|
2 |
|
|
E2 |
− |
(1 |
|
2M/r) |
1 |
|
L2/r2 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
|
˜ |
|
− |
|
|
|
|
+ ˜ |
|
. |
|
|
(11.26) |
||||||
|
|
dφ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L2 |
/r4 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
˜ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
It is convenient to define |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
u := 1/r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.27) |
||||
|
and obtain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
du |
|
2 |
|
|
|
E˜ 2 |
− (1 − 2Mu) |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
+ u |
. |
|
|
(11.28) |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
dφ |
|
L˜ 2 |
L˜ 2 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The Newtonian orbit is found by neglecting u3 terms (see Exer. 11, § 11.7) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
du |
2 |
|
|
E˜ 2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|||||
|
|
Newtonian : |
|
|
= |
|
|
− |
|
|
(1 |
− 2Mu) − u |
|
. |
(11.29) |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
dφ |
L˜ 2 |
L˜ 2 |
|
= ˜ 2
A circular orbit in Newtonian theory has u M/L (take the square root equal to 1 in Eq. (11.17)), so we define
|
|
|
|
y = u − |
|
M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.30) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
L˜ 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
so that y represents the deviation from circularity. We then get |
|
||||||||||||||||
dφ |
= |
|
L˜ 2 |
1 |
+ |
L˜ 4 |
− |
|
|
||||||||
|
dy |
|
2 |
|
E˜ 2 − |
|
|
M2 |
|
|
|
y2. |
(11.31) |
||||
It is easy to see that this is satisfied by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Newtonian : y = % |
E2 |
|
2/L2 |
− |
1 |
& |
1/2 |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
˜ |
|
+ M ˜ |
|
|
|
cos(φ + B), |
(11.32) |
||||||||||
|
|
L2 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
˜ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where B is arbitrary. This is clearly periodic: as φ advances by 2π , y returns to its value and, therefore, so does r. The constant B just determines the initial orientation of the orbit. It is interesting, but unimportant for our purposes, that by solving for r we get
|
1 |
|
|
M |
+ % |
E2 |
+ |
M2/L2 |
− |
1 |
& |
1/2 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Newtonian : |
|
|
|
= |
|
|
˜ |
|
˜ |
|
cos(φ + B), |
(11.33) |
||||
|
r |
L2 |
|
|
L2 |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
˜ |
|
|
|
˜ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
which is the equation of an ellipse.
We now consider the relativistic case and make the same definition of y, but instead of throwing away the u3 term in Eq. (11.28) we assume that the orbit is nearly circular, so that y is small, and we neglect only the terms in y3. Then we get
Nearly circular:
dφ |
|
= |
˜ |
+ |
L˜ 2 ˜ |
− |
|
+ |
L˜ 6 |
+ |
L˜ 2 y − 1 − |
L˜ 2 |
y2. |
(11.34) |
|
|
dy |
2 |
|
E2 |
|
M2/L2 |
|
1 |
|
2M4 |
|
6M3 |
6M2 |
|
|
290 |
Schwarzschild geometry and black holes |
This can be made analogous to Eq. (11.31) by completing the square on the right-hand side. The result is the solution
|
|
|
y = y0 + A cos(kφ + B), |
|
|
(11.35) |
|||||||||||||
where B is arbitrary and the other constants are |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
k = 1 − 6L˜2 |
|
|
|
1/2 |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
M2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
y0 = 3M3/k2L˜ 2, |
L2 |
˜ |
|
− |
+ |
L6 − y02 |
& |
. |
(11.36) |
||||||||||
A = k % ˜ + |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
1 E2 |
|
M2/L2 |
|
1 2M4 |
|
1/2 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
˜ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
˜ |
|
|
|
|
The appearance of the constant y0 just means that the orbit oscillates not about y = 0
= ˜ 2 =
(u M/L ) but about y y0: Eq. (11.30) doesn’t use the correct radius for a circular orbit in GR. The amplitude A is also somewhat different, but what is most interesting here is the fact that k is not 1. The orbit returns to the same r when kφ goes through 2π , from Eq. (11.35). Therefore the change in φ from one perihelion to the next is
|
2π |
= 2π 1 − |
M2 |
|
−1/2 |
φ = |
|
6 |
, |
||
k |
L˜ 2 |
which, for nearly Newtonian orbits, is
φ 2π 1 + 3M2 .
˜ 2
L
The perihelion advance, then, from one orbit to the next, is
= 2 ˜ 2
φ 6π M /L radians per orbit.
(11.37)
(11.38)
(11.39)
˜
We can use Eq. (11.20) to obtain L in terms of r, since the corrections for noncircularity will make changes in Eq. (11.39) of the same order as terms we have already neglected. Moreover, if we consider orbits about a nonrelativistic star, we can approximate Eq. (11.20) by
L˜ 2 = |
|
Mr |
|
|
≈ Mr, |
|
|
|||||
1 |
− |
3M/r |
|
|
||||||||
so that we get |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
φ ≈ |
|
M |
|
|
|
|||||||
6π |
|
. |
|
|
(11.40) |
|||||||
r |
|
|
||||||||||
For Mercury’s orbit, r = 5.55 × 107 km and M = 1 M |
+ |
= 1.47 km, so that |
|
|||||||||
( φ)Mercury = 4.99 × |
10− |
7 |
|
|
|
(11.41) |
||||||
|
|
radians per orbit. |
||||||||||
Each orbit take 0.24 yr, so the shift is |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( φ)Mercury = .43 /yr = 43 /century. |
(11.42) |