Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
FirstCourseGR.pdf
Скачиваний:
38
Добавлен:
07.03.2016
Размер:
7.41 Mб
Скачать

300

 

 

Schwarzschild geometry and black holes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is clear that as ε 0 the integral of this goes like In ε, which diverges. We would also

 

 

 

˜

=

(2M/r)]1 term, which

 

find this for E

1, because the divergence comes from the [1

 

˜ =

doesn’t contain E. Therefore a particle reaches the surface r 2M only after an infinite coordinate time has elapsed. Since the proper time is finite, the coordinate time must be behaving badly.

Inside r = 2M

To see just how badly it behaves, let us ask what happens to a particle after it reaches r = 2M. It must clearly pass to smaller r unless it is destroyed. This might happen if at r = 2M there were a ‘curvature singularity’, where the gravitational forces grew strong enough to tear anything apart. But calculation of the components Rα βμν of Riemannian tensor in the local inertial frame of the infalling particle shows them to be perfectly finite: Exer. 20, § 11.7. So we must conclude that the particle will just keep going. If we look at the geometry inside but near r = 2M, by introducing ε := 2M r, then the line element is

ds2

=

 

ε

 

dt2

2M ε

dε2

+

(2M

ε)2d 2.

(11.63)

2M

ε

 

 

 

ε

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Since ε > 0 inside r = 2M, we see that a line on which t, θ , φ are constant has ds2 < 0: it is timelike. Therefore ε (and hence r) is a timelike coordnate, while t has become spacelike: even more evidence for the funniness of t and r! Since the infalling particle must follow a timelike world line, it must constantly change r, and of course this means decrease r. So a particle inside r = 2M will inevitably reach r = 0, and there a true curvature singulaity awaits it: sure destruction by infinite forces (Exer. 20, § 11.7). But what happens if the particle inside r = 2M tries to send out a photon to someone outside r = 2M in order to describe his impending doom? This photon, no matter how directed, must also go forward in ‘time’ as seen locally by the particle, and this means to decreasing r. So the photon will not get out either. Everything inside r = 2M is trapped and, moreover, doomed to encounter the singularity at r = 0, since r = 0 is in the future of every timelike and null world line inside r = 2M. Once a particle crosses the surface r = 2M, it cannot be seen by an external observer, since to be seen means to send out a photon which reaches the external observer. This surface is therefore called a horizon, since a horizon on Earth has the same effect (for different reasons!). We shall henceforth refer to r = 2M as the Schwarzschild horizon.

Coordinate systems

So far, our approach has been purely algebraic – we have no ‘picture’ of the geometry. To develop a picture we will first draw a coordinate diagram in Schwarzschild coordinates, and on it we will draw the light cones, or at least the paths of the radially ingoing and outgoing null lines emanating from certain events (Fig. 11.10). These light cones may be calculated by solving ds2 = 0 for θ and φ constant:

301

11.2 Nature of the surface r = 2M

t

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

r

 

 

2M

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Light cones drawn in Schwarzschild coordinates close up near the surface r = 2M.

Figure 11.10

 

 

dr

= ± 1 2r

.

(11.64)

 

 

 

dt

 

M

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In a t r diagram, these lines have slope ± 1 far from the star (standard SR light cone) but their slope approaches ± ∞ as r 2M. This means that they become more vertical: the cone ‘closes up’. Since particle world lines are confined within the local light cone (a particle must move slower than light), this closing up of the cones forces the world lines of particles to become more vertical: if they reach r = 2M, they reach it at t = ∞. This is the ‘picture’ behind the algebraic result that a particle takes infinite coordinate time to reach the horizon. Notice that no particle world line reaches the line r = 2M for any finite value of t. This might suggest that the line (r = 2M, −∞ < t < ) is really not a line at all but a single point in spacetime. That is, our coordinates may go bad by expanding a single event into the whole line r = 2M, which would have the effect that if any particle reached the horizon after that event, then it would have to cross r = 2M ‘after’ t = + ∞. This singularity would then be very like the one in Fig. 11.9 for spherical coordinates at the pole: a whole line in the bad coordinates representing a point in the real space. Notice that the coordinate diagram in Fig. 11.10 makes no attempt to represent the geometry properly, only the coordinates. It clearly does a poor job on the geometry because the light cones close up. Since we have already decided that they don’t really close up (particles reach the horizon at finite proper time and encounter a perfectly well-behaved geometry there), the remedy is to find coordinates which do not close up the light cones.

Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates

The search for these coordinates was a long and difficult one, and ended in 1960. The good coordinates are known as Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates, are called u and v, and are defined by

302

 

Schwarzschild geometry and black holes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

v = (r/2M 1)1/2er/4M sinh(t/4M),

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

u = (r/2M

1)1/2er/4M cosh(t/4M),

 

(11.65)

 

for r > 2M and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

v = (1 r/2M)1/2er/4M cosh(t/4M),

 

 

 

u = (1

r/2M)1/2er/4M sinh(t/4M),

 

(11.66)

 

for r < 2M. (This transformation is singular at r = 2M, but that is necessary in order to

 

eliminate the coordinate singularity there.) The metric in these coordinates is found to be

 

 

ds2 = −

32M3

er/2M (dv2 du2) + r2d 2,

(11.67)

 

 

 

r

where, now, r is not to be regarded as a coordinate but as a function of u and v, given implicitly by the inverse of Eqs. (11.65) and (11.66):

-

r

1. er/2M = u2 v2.

(11.68)

2M

Notice several things about Eq. (11.67). There is nothing singular about any metric term at r = 2M. There is, however, a singularity at r = 0, where we expect it. A radial null line (dθ = dφ = ds = 0) is a line

dv = ±du.

(11.69)

This last result is very important. It means that in a (u, υ) diagram, the light cones are all as open as in SR. This result makes these coordinates particularly useful for visualizing the geometry in a coordinate diagram. The (u, υ) diagram is, then, given in Fig. 11.11. Compare this with the result of Exer. 21, § 5.8.

II

r = 0

r

 

=

 

c

 

o

 

n

 

st

 

III

I

 

IV

,t=∞ r=2M

t = const

r = const

r =

Figure 11.11 Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates keep the light cones at 45 everywhere. The singularity at 0 (toothed line) bounds the future of all events inside (above) the line r = 2M, t = +∞. Events outside this horizon have part of their future free of singularities.

303

 

11.2 Nature of the surface r = 2M

 

 

Much needs to be said about this. First, two light cones are drawn for illustration. Any

 

 

 

45line is a radial null line. Second, only u and υ are plotted: θ and φ are suppressed;

 

therefore each point is really a two sphere of events. Third, lines of constant r are hyper-

 

bolae, as is clear from Eq. (11.68). For r > 2M, these hyperbolae run roughly vertically,

 

being asymptotic to the 45line from the origin u = υ = 0. For r < 2M, the hyperbolae

 

run roughly horizontally, with the same asymptotes. This means that for r < 2M, a timelike

 

line (confined within the light cone) cannot remain at constant r. This is the result we had

 

before. The hyperbola r = 0 is the end of the spacetime, since a true singularity is there.

 

Note that although r = 0 is a ‘point’ in ordinary space, it is a whole hyperbola here. How-

 

ever, not too much can be made of this, since it is a singularity of the geometry: we should

 

not glibly speak of it as a part of spacetime with a well-defined dimensionality.

 

 

Our fourth remark is that lines of constant t, being orthogonal to lines of constant r,

 

are straight lines in this diagram, radiating outwards from the origin u = υ = 0. (They are

 

orthogonal to the hyperbolae r = const. in the spacetime sense of orthogonality; recall

 

our diagrams in § 1.7 of invariant hyperbolae in SR, which had the same property of

 

being orthogonal to lines radiating out from the origin.) In the limit as t → ∞, these lines

 

approach the 45line from the origin. Since all the lines t = const. pass through the ori-

 

gin, the origin would be expanded into a whole line in a (t, r) coordinate diagram like

 

Fig. 11.10, which is what we guessed after discussing that diagram. A world line cross-

 

ing this t = ∞ line in Fig. 11.11 enters the region in which r is a time coordinate, and so

 

cannot get out again. The true horizon, then, is this line r = 2M, t = +∞.

 

 

Fifth, since for a distant observer t really does measure proper time, and an object that

 

falls to the horizon crosses all the lines t = const. up to t = ∞, a distant observer would

 

conclude that it takes an infinite time for the infalling object to reach the horizon. We have

 

already drawn this conclusion before, but here we see it displayed clearly in the diagram.

 

There is nothing ‘wrong’ in this statement: the distant observer does wait an infinite time

 

to get the information that the object has crossed the horizon. But the object reaches the

 

horizon in a finite time on its own clock. If the infalling object sends out radio pulses each

 

time its clock ticks, then it will emit only a finite number before reaching the horizon, so

 

the distant observer can receive only a finite number of pulses. Since these are stretched

 

out over a very large amount of the distant observer’s time, the observer concludes that

 

time on the infalling clock is slowing down and eventually stopping. If the infalling ‘clock’

 

is a photon, the observer will conclude that the photon experiences an infinite gravitational

 

redshift. This will also happen if the infalling ‘object’ is a gravitational wave of short

 

wavelength compared to the horizon size.

 

 

Sixth, this horizon is itself a null line. This must be the case, since the horizon is the

 

boundary between null rays that cannot get out and those that can. It is therefore the path

 

of the ‘marginal’ null ray. Seventh, the 45lines from the origin divide spacetime up into

 

four regions, labeled I, II, III, IV. Region I is clearly the ‘exterior’, r > 2M, and region II

 

is the interior of the horizon. But what about III and IV? To discuss them is beyond the

 

scope of this publication (see Misner et al. 1973, Box 33.2G and Ch. 34; and Hawking and

 

Ellis 1973), but one remark must be made. Consider the dashed line in Fig. (11.11), which

 

could be the path of an infalling particle. If this black hole were formed by the collapse of

 

a star, then we know that outside the star the geometry is the Schwarzschild geometry, but

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]