- •Contents
- •Preface to the second edition
- •Preface to the first edition
- •1 Special relativity
- •1.2 Definition of an inertial observer in SR
- •1.4 Spacetime diagrams
- •1.6 Invariance of the interval
- •1.8 Particularly important results
- •Time dilation
- •Lorentz contraction
- •Conventions
- •Failure of relativity?
- •1.9 The Lorentz transformation
- •1.11 Paradoxes and physical intuition
- •The problem
- •Brief solution
- •2 Vector analysis in special relativity
- •Transformation of basis vectors
- •Inverse transformations
- •2.3 The four-velocity
- •2.4 The four-momentum
- •Conservation of four-momentum
- •Scalar product of two vectors
- •Four-velocity and acceleration as derivatives
- •Energy and momentum
- •2.7 Photons
- •No four-velocity
- •Four-momentum
- •Zero rest-mass particles
- •3 Tensor analysis in special relativity
- •Components of a tensor
- •General properties
- •Notation for derivatives
- •Components
- •Symmetries
- •Circular reasoning?
- •Mixed components of metric
- •Metric and nonmetric vector algebras
- •3.10 Exercises
- •4 Perfect fluids in special relativity
- •The number density n
- •The flux across a surface
- •Number density as a timelike flux
- •The flux across the surface
- •4.4 Dust again: the stress–energy tensor
- •Energy density
- •4.5 General fluids
- •Definition of macroscopic quantities
- •First law of thermodynamics
- •The general stress–energy tensor
- •The spatial components of T, T ij
- •Conservation of energy–momentum
- •Conservation of particles
- •No heat conduction
- •No viscosity
- •Form of T
- •The conservation laws
- •4.8 Gauss’ law
- •4.10 Exercises
- •5 Preface to curvature
- •The gravitational redshift experiment
- •Nonexistence of a Lorentz frame at rest on Earth
- •The principle of equivalence
- •The redshift experiment again
- •Local inertial frames
- •Tidal forces
- •The role of curvature
- •Metric tensor
- •5.3 Tensor calculus in polar coordinates
- •Derivatives of basis vectors
- •Derivatives of general vectors
- •The covariant derivative
- •Divergence and Laplacian
- •5.4 Christoffel symbols and the metric
- •Calculating the Christoffel symbols from the metric
- •5.5 Noncoordinate bases
- •Polar coordinate basis
- •Polar unit basis
- •General remarks on noncoordinate bases
- •Noncoordinate bases in this book
- •5.8 Exercises
- •6 Curved manifolds
- •Differential structure
- •Proof of the local-flatness theorem
- •Geodesics
- •6.5 The curvature tensor
- •Geodesic deviation
- •The Ricci tensor
- •The Einstein tensor
- •6.7 Curvature in perspective
- •7 Physics in a curved spacetime
- •7.2 Physics in slightly curved spacetimes
- •7.3 Curved intuition
- •7.6 Exercises
- •8 The Einstein field equations
- •Geometrized units
- •8.2 Einstein’s equations
- •8.3 Einstein’s equations for weak gravitational fields
- •Nearly Lorentz coordinate systems
- •Gauge transformations
- •Riemann tensor
- •Weak-field Einstein equations
- •Newtonian limit
- •The far field of stationary relativistic sources
- •Definition of the mass of a relativistic body
- •8.5 Further reading
- •9 Gravitational radiation
- •The effect of waves on free particles
- •Measuring the stretching of space
- •Polarization of gravitational waves
- •An exact plane wave
- •9.2 The detection of gravitational waves
- •General considerations
- •Measuring distances with light
- •Beam detectors
- •Interferometer observations
- •9.3 The generation of gravitational waves
- •Simple estimates
- •Slow motion wave generation
- •Exact solution of the wave equation
- •Preview
- •Energy lost by a radiating system
- •Overview
- •Binary systems
- •Spinning neutron stars
- •9.6 Further reading
- •10 Spherical solutions for stars
- •The metric
- •Physical interpretation of metric terms
- •The Einstein tensor
- •Equation of state
- •Equations of motion
- •Einstein equations
- •Schwarzschild metric
- •Generality of the metric
- •10.5 The interior structure of the star
- •The structure of Newtonian stars
- •Buchdahl’s interior solution
- •10.7 Realistic stars and gravitational collapse
- •Buchdahl’s theorem
- •Quantum mechanical pressure
- •White dwarfs
- •Neutron stars
- •10.9 Exercises
- •11 Schwarzschild geometry and black holes
- •Black holes in Newtonian gravity
- •Conserved quantities
- •Perihelion shift
- •Post-Newtonian gravity
- •Gravitational deflection of light
- •Gravitational lensing
- •Coordinate singularities
- •Inside r = 2M
- •Coordinate systems
- •Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates
- •Formation of black holes in general
- •General properties of black holes
- •Kerr black hole
- •Dragging of inertial frames
- •Ergoregion
- •The Kerr horizon
- •Equatorial photon motion in the Kerr metric
- •The Penrose process
- •Supermassive black holes
- •Dynamical black holes
- •11.6 Further reading
- •12 Cosmology
- •The universe in the large
- •The cosmological arena
- •12.2 Cosmological kinematics: observing the expanding universe
- •Homogeneity and isotropy of the universe
- •Models of the universe: the cosmological principle
- •Cosmological metrics
- •Cosmological redshift as a distance measure
- •The universe is accelerating!
- •12.3 Cosmological dynamics: understanding the expanding universe
- •Critical density and the parameters of our universe
- •12.4 Physical cosmology: the evolution of the universe we observe
- •Dark matter and galaxy formation: the universe after decoupling
- •The early universe: fundamental physics meets cosmology
- •12.5 Further reading
- •Appendix A Summary of linear algebra
- •Vector space
- •References
- •Index
341 |
12.2 Cosmological kinematics: observing the expanding universe |
highly inhomogeneous, then we would be posed difficult physical and philosophical questions regarding the apparently special nature of our history until this moment. It is to avoid these difficulties that we usually assume that the unknown regions are very like what we observe, and in particular are homogeneous and isotropic. Notice that there are very good reasons for adopting this idea. Consider, in Fig. 12.2, two hypothetical observers within our own past light cone, but at such an early time in the evolution of the universe that their own past light-cones are disjoint. Then they are outside each other’s particle horizon. But we can see that the physical conditions near each of them are very similar: we can confirm that if they apply the principle that regions outside their particle horizons are similar to regions inside, then they would be right! It seems unreasonable to expect that if this principle holds for other observers, then it will not also hold for us.
This modern version of the Copernican Principle is called the Cosmological Principle, or more informally the Assumption of Mediocrity, the ordinary-ness of our own location in the universe. It is, mathematically, an extremely powerful (i.e. restrictive) assumption. We shall adopt it, but we should bear in mind that predictions about the future depend strongly on the assumption of mediocrity.
The second inaccessible region is that part of the interior of our past light cone which our instruments cannot get information about. This includes galaxies so distant that they are too dim to be seen; processes that give off radiation – like gravitational waves – which we have not yet been able to detect; and events that are masked from view, such as those which emitted electromagnetic radiation before the epoch of decoupling (see below) when the universe ceased to be an ionized plasma and became transparent to electromagnetic waves. The limit of decoupling is sometimes called our optical horizon since no light reaches us from beyond it (from earlier times). But gravitational waves do propagate freely before this, so eventually we will begin to make observations across this ‘horizon’: the optical horizon is not a fundamental limit in the way the particle horizon is.
Cosmological metrics
The metric tensor that represents a cosmological model must incorporate the observed homogeneity and isotropy. We shall therefore adopt the following idealizations about the universe: (i) spacetime can be sliced into hypersurfaces of constant time which are perfectly homogeneous and isotropic; and (ii) the mean rest frame of the galaxies agrees with this definition of simultaneity. Let us next try to simplify the problem as much as possible by adopting comoving coordinates: each galaxy is idealized as having no random velocity, and we give each galaxy a fixed set of coordinates {xi, i = 1, 2, 3}. We choose our time coordinate t to be proper time for each galaxy. The expansion of the universe – the change of proper distance between galaxies – is represented by time-dependent metric coefficients. Thus, if at one moment, t0, the hypersurface of constant time has the line element
dl2(t0) = hij(t0) dxi dx j |
(12.2) |
342 |
Cosmology |
(these hs have nothing to do with linearized theory), then the expansion of the hypersurface can be represented by
dl2(t1) = f (t1, t0)hij(t0) dxi dx j |
|
= hij(t1) dxi dx j. |
(12.3) |
This form guarantees that all the hijs increase at the same rate; otherwise the expansion would be anisotropic (see Exer. 4, § 12.6). In general, then, Eq. (12.2) can be written
dl2(t) = R2(t)hij dxi dx j, |
(12.4) |
where R is an overall scale factor which equals one at t0, and where hij is a constant metric equal to that of the hypersurface at t0. We shall explore what form hij can take in detail in a moment.
First we extend the constant-time hypersurface line element to a line element for the full spacetime. In general, it would be
ds2 = −dt2 + g0i dt dxi + R2(t)hij dxi dx j, |
(12.5) |
where g00 = −1, because t is proper time along a line dxi = 0. However, if the definition of simultaneity given by t = const. is to agree with that given by the local Lorentz frame attached to a galaxy (idealization (ii) above), then e0 must be orthogonal to ei in our comoving coordinates. This means that g0i = e0 · ei must vanish, and we get
ds2 = −dt2 + R2(t)hij dxi dx j. |
(12.6) |
What form can hij take? Since it is isotropic, it must be spherically symmetric about the origin of the coordinates, which can of course be chosen to be located at any point we like. When we discussed spherical stars we showed that a spherically symmetric metric always has the line element (last part of Eq. (10.5))
dl2 = e2 (r) dr2 + r2d 2. |
(12.7) |
This form of the metric implies only isotropy about one point. We want a stronger condition, namely that the metric is homogeneous. A necessary condition for this is certainly that the Ricci scalar curvature of the three-dimensional metric, Rii, must have the same value at every point: every scalar must be independent of position at a fixed time. We will show below, remarkably, that this is sufficient as well, but for now we just treat it as the next constraint we place on the metric in Eq. (12.7). We can calculate Rii using Exer. 35 of § 6.9. Alternatively, we can use Eqs. (10.15)–(10.17) of our discussion of spherically symmetric spacetimes in Ch. 10, realizing that Gij for the line element, Eq. (12.7), above is obtainable from Gij for the line element, Eq. (10.7), of a spherical star by setting to zero. We get
1 |
e2 (1 |
− e−2 ), |
|
|
Grr = − |
|
|
||
r2 |
|
|||
Gθ θ = −r e−2 , |
(12.8) |
Gφφ = sin2 θ Gθ θ .
343 |
12.2 Cosmological kinematics: observing the expanding universe |
The trace of this tensor is also a scalar, and must also therefore be constant. So instead of computing the Ricci scalar curvature, we simply require that the trace G of the threedimensional Einstein tensor be a constant. (In fact, this trace is just −1/2 of the Ricci scalar.) The trace is
G = Gijgij |
|
|
|
|
||
1 |
e2 (1 − e−2 ) e−2 − 2r e−2 r−2 |
|
||||
= − |
|
|
||||
r2 |
|
|||||
1 |
|
1 |
e−2 (1 − 2r ) |
|
||
= − |
|
+ |
|
|
||
r2 |
r2 |
|
||||
1 |
|
− (r e−2 ) ]. |
|
|||
= − |
|
[1 |
(12.9) |
|||
r2 |
Demanding homogeneity means setting G to some constant κ:
1 |
[r(1 − e−2 )] . |
|
|||
κ = − |
|
(12.10) |
|||
r2 |
|||||
This is easily integrated to give |
|
|
|
||
grr = e2 = |
1 |
, |
(12.11) |
||
|
|||||
1 + 31 κr2 − A/r |
where A is a constant of integration. As in the case of spherical stars, we must demand local flatness at r = 0 (compare with § 10.5): grr(r = 0) = 1. This implies A = 0. Defining the more conventional curvature constant k = −κ/3 gives
grr |
= |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
− |
kr2 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dr2 |
|
|
||
dl2 |
= |
|
|
|
+ r2 |
d 2. |
(12.12) |
1 |
− |
kr2 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have not yet proved that this space is isotropic about every point; all we have shown is that Eq. (12.12) is the unique space which satisfies the necessary condition that this curvature scalar be homogeneous. Thus, if a space that is isotropic and homogeneous exists at all, it must have the metric, Eq. (12.12), for at least some k.
In fact, the converse is true: the metric of Eq. (12.12) is homogeneous and isotropic for any value of k. We will demonstrate this explicitly for positive, negative, and zero k separately in the next paragraph. General proofs not depending on the sign of k can be found in, for example, Weinberg (1972) or Schutz (1980b). Assuming this result for the time being, therefore, we conclude that the full cosmological spacetime has the metric
ds2 = −dt2 + R2(t) $ |
1 |
drkr2 + r2 |
d 2 |
! . |
(12.13) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
−
This is called the Robertson–Walker metric. Notice that we can, without loss of generality, scale the coordinate r in such a way as to make k take one of the three values +1, 0, −1. To
344 |
Cosmology |
see this, consider for definiteness k |
= − |
|
|
|
|
˜ = |
˜ |
= |
1/√ |
|
3. Then re-define r |
√3r and R |
|
||||||
the line element becomes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ds2 = −dt2 + R˜ 2(t) |
$ |
dr˜2 |
+ r˜2 |
d 2! . |
|
|
|||
1 r2 |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
− ˜ |
|
|
|
|
3R, and
(12.14)
What we cannot do with this rescaling is change the sign of k. Therefore there are only three spatial hypersurfaces we need consider: k = (−1, 0, 1).
Thre e types of universe
Here we prove that all three kinds of hypersurfaces represent homogenous and isotropic metrics that have different large-scale geometries. Consider first k = 0. Then, at any moment t0, the line element of the hypersurface (setting dt = 0) is
|
|
|
dl2 = R2(t0) dr2 + r2 d 2 |
= d(r )2 + (r )2 d , |
(12.15) |
with r = R(t0)r. (Remember that R(t0) is constant on the hypersurface.) This is clearly the metric of flat Euclidean space. This is the flat Robertson–Walker universe. That it is homogeneous and isotropic is obvious.
Consider, next, k = +1. Let us define a new coordinate χ (r) such that
dχ 2 = |
dr2 |
(12.16) |
|
1 − r2 |
|
||
and χ = 0 where r = 0. This integrates to |
|
|
|
r = sin χ , |
(12.17) |
||
so that the line element for the space t = t0 is |
|
|
|
dl2 = R2(t0)[dχ 2 + sin2 χ (dθ 2 + sin2 θ dφ2)]. |
(12.18) |
We showed in Exer. 33, § 6.9, that this is the metric of a three-sphere of radius R(t0), i.e. of the set of points in four-dimensional Euclidean space that are all at a distance R(t0) from the origin. This model is called the closed, or spherical Robertson–Walker metric and the balloon analogy of cosmological expansion (Fig. 12.1) is particularly appropriate for it. It is clearly homogeneous and isotropic: no matter where we stand on the three-sphere, it looks the same in all directions. Remember that the fourth spatial dimension – the radial direction to the center of the three-sphere – has no physical meaning to us: all our measurements are confined to our three-space so we can have no physical knowledge about the properties or even the existence of that dimension. At this point we should perhaps think of it as simply a tool for making it easy to visualize the three-sphere, not as an extra real dimension, although see the final paragraph of this chapter for a potentially different point of view on this.
The final possibility is k = −1. An analogous coordinate transformation (Exer. 8, § 12.6) gives the line element
dl2 = R2(t0)(dχ 2 + sinh2 χ d 2). |
(12.19) |