- •Contents
- •Preface to the second edition
- •Preface to the first edition
- •1 Special relativity
- •1.2 Definition of an inertial observer in SR
- •1.4 Spacetime diagrams
- •1.6 Invariance of the interval
- •1.8 Particularly important results
- •Time dilation
- •Lorentz contraction
- •Conventions
- •Failure of relativity?
- •1.9 The Lorentz transformation
- •1.11 Paradoxes and physical intuition
- •The problem
- •Brief solution
- •2 Vector analysis in special relativity
- •Transformation of basis vectors
- •Inverse transformations
- •2.3 The four-velocity
- •2.4 The four-momentum
- •Conservation of four-momentum
- •Scalar product of two vectors
- •Four-velocity and acceleration as derivatives
- •Energy and momentum
- •2.7 Photons
- •No four-velocity
- •Four-momentum
- •Zero rest-mass particles
- •3 Tensor analysis in special relativity
- •Components of a tensor
- •General properties
- •Notation for derivatives
- •Components
- •Symmetries
- •Circular reasoning?
- •Mixed components of metric
- •Metric and nonmetric vector algebras
- •3.10 Exercises
- •4 Perfect fluids in special relativity
- •The number density n
- •The flux across a surface
- •Number density as a timelike flux
- •The flux across the surface
- •4.4 Dust again: the stress–energy tensor
- •Energy density
- •4.5 General fluids
- •Definition of macroscopic quantities
- •First law of thermodynamics
- •The general stress–energy tensor
- •The spatial components of T, T ij
- •Conservation of energy–momentum
- •Conservation of particles
- •No heat conduction
- •No viscosity
- •Form of T
- •The conservation laws
- •4.8 Gauss’ law
- •4.10 Exercises
- •5 Preface to curvature
- •The gravitational redshift experiment
- •Nonexistence of a Lorentz frame at rest on Earth
- •The principle of equivalence
- •The redshift experiment again
- •Local inertial frames
- •Tidal forces
- •The role of curvature
- •Metric tensor
- •5.3 Tensor calculus in polar coordinates
- •Derivatives of basis vectors
- •Derivatives of general vectors
- •The covariant derivative
- •Divergence and Laplacian
- •5.4 Christoffel symbols and the metric
- •Calculating the Christoffel symbols from the metric
- •5.5 Noncoordinate bases
- •Polar coordinate basis
- •Polar unit basis
- •General remarks on noncoordinate bases
- •Noncoordinate bases in this book
- •5.8 Exercises
- •6 Curved manifolds
- •Differential structure
- •Proof of the local-flatness theorem
- •Geodesics
- •6.5 The curvature tensor
- •Geodesic deviation
- •The Ricci tensor
- •The Einstein tensor
- •6.7 Curvature in perspective
- •7 Physics in a curved spacetime
- •7.2 Physics in slightly curved spacetimes
- •7.3 Curved intuition
- •7.6 Exercises
- •8 The Einstein field equations
- •Geometrized units
- •8.2 Einstein’s equations
- •8.3 Einstein’s equations for weak gravitational fields
- •Nearly Lorentz coordinate systems
- •Gauge transformations
- •Riemann tensor
- •Weak-field Einstein equations
- •Newtonian limit
- •The far field of stationary relativistic sources
- •Definition of the mass of a relativistic body
- •8.5 Further reading
- •9 Gravitational radiation
- •The effect of waves on free particles
- •Measuring the stretching of space
- •Polarization of gravitational waves
- •An exact plane wave
- •9.2 The detection of gravitational waves
- •General considerations
- •Measuring distances with light
- •Beam detectors
- •Interferometer observations
- •9.3 The generation of gravitational waves
- •Simple estimates
- •Slow motion wave generation
- •Exact solution of the wave equation
- •Preview
- •Energy lost by a radiating system
- •Overview
- •Binary systems
- •Spinning neutron stars
- •9.6 Further reading
- •10 Spherical solutions for stars
- •The metric
- •Physical interpretation of metric terms
- •The Einstein tensor
- •Equation of state
- •Equations of motion
- •Einstein equations
- •Schwarzschild metric
- •Generality of the metric
- •10.5 The interior structure of the star
- •The structure of Newtonian stars
- •Buchdahl’s interior solution
- •10.7 Realistic stars and gravitational collapse
- •Buchdahl’s theorem
- •Quantum mechanical pressure
- •White dwarfs
- •Neutron stars
- •10.9 Exercises
- •11 Schwarzschild geometry and black holes
- •Black holes in Newtonian gravity
- •Conserved quantities
- •Perihelion shift
- •Post-Newtonian gravity
- •Gravitational deflection of light
- •Gravitational lensing
- •Coordinate singularities
- •Inside r = 2M
- •Coordinate systems
- •Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates
- •Formation of black holes in general
- •General properties of black holes
- •Kerr black hole
- •Dragging of inertial frames
- •Ergoregion
- •The Kerr horizon
- •Equatorial photon motion in the Kerr metric
- •The Penrose process
- •Supermassive black holes
- •Dynamical black holes
- •11.6 Further reading
- •12 Cosmology
- •The universe in the large
- •The cosmological arena
- •12.2 Cosmological kinematics: observing the expanding universe
- •Homogeneity and isotropy of the universe
- •Models of the universe: the cosmological principle
- •Cosmological metrics
- •Cosmological redshift as a distance measure
- •The universe is accelerating!
- •12.3 Cosmological dynamics: understanding the expanding universe
- •Critical density and the parameters of our universe
- •12.4 Physical cosmology: the evolution of the universe we observe
- •Dark matter and galaxy formation: the universe after decoupling
- •The early universe: fundamental physics meets cosmology
- •12.5 Further reading
- •Appendix A Summary of linear algebra
- •Vector space
- •References
- •Index
139 |
5.8 Exercises |
by analogy with the development here. What we have to add to all this is a discussion of parallelism, of how to measure the extent to which the Euclidean parallelism axiom fails. This measure is the famous Riemann tensor.
5.7 F u r t h e r re a d i n g
The Eötvös and Pound–Rebka–Snider experiments, and other experimental fundamentals underpinning GR, are discussed by Dicke (1964), Misner et al. (1973), Shapiro (1980), and Will (1993, 2006). See Hoffmann (1983) for a less mathematical discussion of the motivation for introducing curvature. For an up-to-date review of the GPS system’s use of relativity, see Ashby (2003).
The mathematics of curvilinear coordinates is developed from a variety of points of view in: Abraham and Marsden (1978), Lovelock and Rund (1990), and Schutz (1980b).
5.8E xe rc i s e s
1Repeat the argument that led to Eq. (5.1) under more realistic assumptions: suppose a fraction ε of the kinetic energy of the mass at the bottom can be converted into a photon and sent back up, the remaining energy staying at ground level in a useful form. Devise a perpetual motion engine if Eq. (5.1) is violated.
2Explain why a uniform external gravitational field would raise no tides on Earth.
3(a) Show that the coordinate transformation (x, y) → (ξ , η) with ξ = x and η = 1 violates Eq. (5.6).
(b)Are the following coordinate transformations good ones? Compute the Jacobian and list any points at which the transformations fail.
(i)ξ = (x2 + y2)1/2, η = arctan(y/x);
(ii)ξ = ln x, η = y;
(iii)ξ = arctan(y/x), η = (x2 + y2)−1/2.
4A curve is defined by {x = f (λ), y = g(λ), 0 λ 1}. Show that the tangent vector (dx/dλ, dy/dλ) does actually lie tangent to the curve.
5Sketch the following curves. Which have the same paths? Find also their tangent vectors where the parameter equals zero.
(a) x = sin λ, y = cos λ; (b) x = cos(2π t2), y = sin(2π t2 + π ); (c) x = s, y = s + 4;
(d) x = s2, y = −(s − 2)(s + 2); (e) x = μ, y = 1.
6Justify the pictures in Fig. 5.5.
7Calculate all elements of the transformation matrices α β and μν for the transformation from Cartesian (x, y) – the unprimed indices – to polar (r, θ ) – the primed indices.
140 |
|
|
|
Preface to curvature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Uses the result of Exer. 7.) Let f = x2 + y2 + 2xy, and in Cartesian coordinates |
|
8 |
(a) |
||||
|
|
|
|
V → (x2 + 3y, y2 + 3x), W → (1, 1). Compute f as a function of r and θ , and find |
|
|
|
|
|
the components of V and W on the polar basis, expressing them as functions of r |
|
|
|
|
|
and θ . |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
df in Cartesian coordinates and obtain them in polars |
|
|
|
|
Find the components of ˜ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) by direct calculation in polars, and (ii) by transforming components from |
|
|
|
|
|
Cartesian. |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
(i) Use the metric tensor in polar coordinates to find the polar components of the |
|
|
|
|
|
one-forms V˜ and W˜ associated with V and W. (ii) Obtain the polar components of |
|
9 |
|
V˜ and W˜ by transformation of their Cartesian components. |
|||
Draw a diagram similar to Fig. 5.6 to explain Eq. (5.38). |
|||||
10 |
Prove that V, defined in Eq. (5.52), is a 11 tensor. |
||||
11 |
|
the vector field V whose Cartesian compo- |
|||
(Uses the result of Exers. 7 and 8.) For |
|
||||
|
|
|
nents are (x2 + 3y, y2 + 3x), compute: (a) Vα ,β |
in Cartesian; (b) the transformation |
|
|
|
|
μ α β ν Vα ,β to polars; (c) the components |
Vμ ;ν directly in polars using the |
Christoffel symbols, Eq. (5.45), in Eq. (5.50); (d) the divergence Vα ,α using your results in (a); (e) the divergence Vμ ;μ using your results in either (b) or (c); (f) the divergence Vμ ;μ using Eq. (5.56) directly.
12For the one-form field p˜ whose Cartesian components are (x2 + 3y, y2 + 3x), compute: (a) pα,β in Cartesian; (b) the transformation α μ β ν pα,β to polars; (c) the components pμ ;ν directly in polars using the Christoffel symbols, Eq. (5.45), in Eq. (5.63).
13For those who have done both Exers. 11 and 12, show in polars that gμ α Vα ;ν = pμ ;ν .
14 |
For |
the |
tensor |
whose |
polar |
components |
are |
(Arr = r2, Arθ = r sin θ , Aθ r |
= r cos θ , |
|
Aθ θ |
= tan θ ), compute Eq. (5.65) in polars for all possible indices. |
|
||||||
15 |
For |
the |
vector |
whose |
polar |
components |
are |
(Vr = 1, Vθ = 0), compute |
in polars |
all components of the second covariant derivative Vα ;μ;ν . (Hint: to find the second
derivative, treat the first derivative Vα ;μ as any 11 tensor: Eq. (5.66).)
16Fill in all the missing steps leading from Eq. (5.74) to Eq. (5.75).
17Discover how each expression Vβ ,α and Vμ β μα separately transforms under a change of coordinates (for β μα , begin with Eq. (5.44)). Show that neither is the standard tensor law, but that their sum does obey the standard law.
18Verify Eq. (5.78).
˜˜
19Verify that the calculation from Eq. (5.81) to Eq. (5.84), when repeated for dr and dθ , shows them to be a coordinate basis.
20For a noncoordinate basis {eμ}, define eμ eν − eν eμ := cα μν eα and use this in place of Eq. (5.74) to generalize Eq. (5.75).
21Consider the x − t plane of an inertial observer in SR. A certain uniformly accelerated observer wishes to set up an orthonormal coordinate system. By Exer. 21, § 2.9, his world line is
t(λ) = a sinh λ, x(λ) = a cosh λ, |
(5.96) |
where a is a constant and aλ is his proper time (clock time on his wrist watch).
141 |
5.8 Exercises |
(a)Show that the spacelike line described by Eq. (5.96) with a as the variable parameter and λ fixed is orthogonal to his world line where they intersect. Changing λ in Eq. (5.96) then generates a family of such lines.
(b)Show that Eq. (5.96) defines a transformation from coordinates (t, x) to coordi-
nates (λ, a), which form an orthogonal coordinate system. Draw these coordinates and show that they cover only one half of the original t − x plane. Show that the coordinates are bad on the lines |x| = |t|, so they really cover two disjoint quadrants.
(c)Find the metric tensor and all the Christoffel symbols in this coordinate system. This observer will do a perfectly good job, provided that he always uses Christoffel symbols appropriately and sticks to events in his quadrant. In this sense, SR admits
accelerated observers. The right-hand quadrant in these coordinates is sometimes called Rindler space, and the boundary lines x = ±t bear some resemblance to the
black-hole horizons we will study later.
22 Show that if Uα α Vβ = Wβ , then Uα α Vβ = Wβ .