- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Part I General Principles of Cell Death
- •1 Human Caspases – Apoptosis and Inflammation Signaling Proteases
- •1.1. Apoptosis and limited proteolysis
- •1.2. Caspase evolution
- •2. ACTIVATION MECHANISMS
- •2.2. The activation platforms
- •2.4. Proteolytic maturation
- •3. CASPASE SUBSTRATES
- •4. REGULATION BY NATURAL INHIBITORS
- •REFERENCES
- •2 Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins
- •2. CELLULAR FUNCTIONS AND PHENOTYPES OF IAP
- •3. IN VIVO FUNCTIONS OF IAP FAMILY PROTEINS
- •4. SUBCELLULAR LOCATIONS OF IAP
- •8. IAP–IAP INTERACTIONS
- •10. ENDOGENOUS ANTAGONISTS OF IAP
- •11. IAPs AND DISEASE
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2.1. The CD95 (Fas/APO-1) system
- •2.1.1. CD95 and CD95L: discovery of the first direct apoptosis-inducing receptor-ligand system
- •2.1.2. Biochemistry of CD95 apoptosis signaling
- •2.2. The TRAIL (Apo2L) system
- •3.1. The TNF system
- •3.1.1. Biochemistry of TNF signal transduction
- •3.1.2. TNF and TNF blockers in the clinic
- •3.2. The DR3 system
- •4. THE DR6 SYSTEM
- •6. CONCLUDING REMARKS AND OUTLOOK
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •4 Mitochondria and Cell Death
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. MITOCHONDRIAL PHYSIOLOGY
- •3. THE MITOCHONDRIAL PATHWAY OF APOPTOSIS
- •9. CONCLUSIONS
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •3. INHIBITING APOPTOSIS
- •4. INHIBITING THE INHIBITORS
- •6. THE BCL-2 FAMILY AND CANCER
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •6 Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response in Cell Death and Cell Survival
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. THE ESR IN YEAST
- •3. THE ESR IN MAMMALS
- •4. THE ESR AND CELL DEATH
- •5. THE ESR IN DEVELOPMENT AND TISSUE HOMEOSTASIS
- •6. THE ESR IN HUMAN DISEASE
- •7. CONCLUSION
- •7 Autophagy – The Liaison between the Lysosomal System and Cell Death
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. AUTOPHAGY
- •2.2. Physiologic functions of autophagy
- •2.3. Autophagy and human pathology
- •3. AUTOPHAGY AND CELL DEATH
- •3.1. Autophagy as anti–cell death mechanism
- •3.2. Autophagy as a cell death mechanism
- •3.3. Molecular players of the autophagy–cell death cross-talk
- •4. AUTOPHAGY, CELLULAR DEATH, AND CANCER
- •5. CONCLUDING REMARKS AND PENDING QUESTIONS
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •8 Cell Death in Response to Genotoxic Stress and DNA Damage
- •1. TYPES OF DNA DAMAGE AND REPAIR SYSTEMS
- •2. DNA DAMAGE RESPONSE
- •2.2. Transducers
- •2.3. Effectors
- •4. CHROMATIN MODIFICATIONS
- •5. CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT REGULATION
- •6. WHEN REPAIR FAILS: SENESCENCE VERSUS APOPTOSIS
- •6.1. DNA damage response and the induction of apoptosis
- •6.2. p53-independent mechanisms of apoptosis
- •6.3. DNA damage response and senescence induction
- •7. DNA DAMAGE FROM OXIDATIVE STRESS
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •9 Ceramide and Lipid Mediators in Apoptosis
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •3.1. Basic cell signaling often involves small molecules
- •3.2. Sphingolipids are cell-signaling molecules
- •3.2.1. Ceramide induces apoptosis
- •3.2.2. Ceramide accumulates during programmed cell death
- •3.2.3. Inhibition of ceramide production alters cell death signaling
- •4.1. Ceramide is generated through SM hydrolysis
- •4.3. aSMase can be activated independently of extracellular receptors to regulate apoptosis
- •4.4. Controversial aspects of the role of aSMase in apoptosis
- •4.5. De novo ceramide synthesis regulates programmed cell death
- •4.6. p53 and Bcl-2–like proteins are connected to de novo ceramide synthesis
- •4.7. The role and regulation of de novo synthesis in ceramide-mediated cell death is poorly understood
- •5. CONCLUDING REMARKS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
- •5.1. Who? (Which enzyme?)
- •5.2. What? (Which ceramide?)
- •5.3. Where? (Which compartment?)
- •5.4. When? (At what steps?)
- •5.5. How? (Through what mechanisms?)
- •5.6. What purpose?
- •6. SUMMARY
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •1. General Introduction
- •1.1. Cytotoxic lymphocytes and apoptosis
- •2. CYTOTOXIC GRANULES AND GRANULE EXOCYTOSIS
- •2.1. Synthesis and loading of the cytotoxic granule proteins into the secretory granules
- •2.2. The immunological synapse
- •2.3. Secretion of granule proteins
- •2.4. Uptake of proapoptotic proteins into the target cell
- •2.5. Activation of death pathways by granzymes
- •3. GRANULE-BOUND CYTOTOXIC PROTEINS
- •3.1. Perforin
- •3.2. Granulysin
- •3.3. Granzymes
- •3.3.1. GrB-mediated apoptosis
- •3.3.2. GrA-mediated cell death
- •3.3.3. Orphan granzyme-mediated cell death
- •5. CONCLUSIONS
- •REFERENCES
- •Part II Cell Death in Tissues and Organs
- •1.1. Death by trophic factor deprivation
- •1.2. Key molecules regulating neuronal apoptosis during development
- •1.2.1. Roles of caspases and Apaf-1 in neuronal cell death
- •1.2.2. Role of Bcl-2 family members in neuronal cell death
- •1.3. Signal transduction from neurotrophins and neurotrophin receptors
- •1.3.1. Signals for survival
- •1.3.2. Signals for death
- •2.1. Apoptosis in neurodegenerative diseases
- •2.1.4. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- •2.2. Necrotic cell death in neurodegenerative diseases
- •2.2.1. Calpains
- •2.2.2. Cathepsins
- •3. CONCLUSIONS
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENT
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENT
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •5. S-NITROSYLATION OF PARKIN
- •7. POTENTIAL TREATMENT OF EXCESSIVE NMDA-INDUCED Ca2+ INFLUX AND FREE RADICAL GENERATION
- •8. FUTURE THERAPEUTICS: NITROMEMANTINES
- •9. CONCLUSIONS
- •Acknowledgments
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •3. MITOCHONDRIAL PERMEABILITY TRANSITION ACTIVATED BY Ca2+ AND OXIDATIVE STRESS
- •4.1. Mitochondrial apoptotic pathways
- •4.2. Bcl-2 family proteins
- •4.3. Caspase-dependent apoptosis
- •4.4. Caspase-independent apoptosis
- •4.5. Calpains in ischemic neural cell death
- •5. SUMMARY
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. HISTORICAL ANTECEDENTS
- •7.1. Activation of p21 waf1/cip1: Targeting extrinsic and intrinsic pathways to death
- •8. CONCLUSION
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- •REFERENCES
- •16 Apoptosis and Homeostasis in the Eye
- •1.1. Lens
- •1.2. Retina
- •2. ROLE OF APOPTOSIS IN DISEASES OF THE EYE
- •2.1. Glaucoma
- •2.2. Age-related macular degeneration
- •4. APOPTOSIS AND OCULAR IMMUNE PRIVILEGE
- •5. CONCLUSIONS
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •17 Cell Death in the Inner Ear
- •3. THE COCHLEA IS THE HEARING ORGAN
- •3.1. Ototoxic hair cell death
- •3.2. Aminoglycoside-induced hair cell death
- •3.3. Cisplatin-induced hair cell death
- •3.4. Therapeutic strategies to prevent hair cell death
- •3.5. Challenges to studies of hair cell death
- •4. SPIRAL GANGLION NEURON DEATH
- •4.1. Neurotrophic support from sensory hair cells and supporting cells
- •4.2. Afferent activity from hair cells
- •4.3. Molecular manifestations of spiral ganglion neuron death
- •4.4. Therapeutic interventions to prevent SGN death
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •18 Cell Death in the Olfactory System
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Anatomical Aspects
- •3. Life and Death in the Olfactory System
- •3.1. Olfactory epithelium
- •3.2. Olfactory bulb
- •REFERENCES
- •1. Introduction
- •3.1. Beta cell death in the development of T1D
- •3.2. Mechanisms of beta cell death in type 1 diabetes
- •3.2.1. Apoptosis signaling pathways downstream of death receptors and inflammatory cytokines
- •3.2.2. Oxidative stress
- •3.3. Mechanisms of beta cell death in type 2 diabetes
- •3.3.1. Glucolipitoxicity
- •3.3.2. Endoplasmic reticulum stress
- •5. SUMMARY
- •Acknowledgments
- •REFERENCES
- •20 Apoptosis in the Physiology and Diseases of the Respiratory Tract
- •1. APOPTOSIS IN LUNG DEVELOPMENT
- •2. APOPTOSIS IN LUNG PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
- •2.1. Apoptosis in pulmonary inflammation
- •2.2. Apoptosis in acute lung injury
- •2.3. Apoptosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- •2.4. Apoptosis in interstitial lung diseases
- •2.5. Apoptosis in pulmonary arterial hypertension
- •2.6. Apoptosis in lung cancer
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •21 Regulation of Cell Death in the Gastrointestinal Tract
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. ESOPHAGUS
- •3. STOMACH
- •4. SMALL AND LARGE INTESTINE
- •5. LIVER
- •6. PANCREAS
- •7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUDING REMARKS
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •22 Apoptosis in the Kidney
- •1. NORMAL KIDNEY STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
- •3. APOPTOSIS IN ADULT KIDNEY DISEASE
- •4. REGULATION OF APOPTOSIS IN KIDNEY CELLS
- •4.1. Survival factors
- •4.2. Lethal factors
- •4.2.1. TNF superfamily cytokines
- •4.2.2. Other cytokines
- •4.2.3. Glucose
- •4.2.4. Drugs and xenobiotics
- •4.2.5. Ischemia-reperfusion and sepsis
- •5. THERAPEUTIC APPROACHES
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. APOPTOSIS IN THE NORMAL BREAST
- •2.1. Occurrence and role of apoptosis in the developing breast
- •2.2.2. Death ligands and death receptor pathway
- •2.2.4. LIF-STAT3 proapoptotic signaling
- •2.2.5. IGF survival signaling
- •2.2.6. Regulation by adhesion
- •2.2.7. PI3K/AKT pathway: molecular hub for survival signals
- •2.2.8. Downstream regulators of apoptosis: the BCL-2 family members
- •3. APOPTOSIS IN BREAST CANCER
- •3.1. Apoptosis in breast tumorigenesis and cancer progression
- •3.2. Molecular dysregulation of apoptosis in breast cancer
- •3.2.1. Altered expression of death ligands and their receptors in breast cancer
- •3.2.2. Deregulation of prosurvival growth factors and their receptors
- •3.2.3. Alterations in cell adhesion and resistance to anoikis
- •3.2.4. Enhanced activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway in breast cancer
- •3.2.5. p53 inactivation in breast cancer
- •3.2.6. Altered expression of BCL-2 family of proteins in breast cancer
- •5. CONCLUSION
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. DETECTING CELL DEATH IN THE FEMALE GONADS
- •4. APOPTOSIS AND FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE AGING
- •6. CONCLUDING REMARKS
- •REFERENCES
- •25 Apoptotic Signaling in Male Germ Cells
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •3.1. Murine models
- •3.2. Primate models
- •3.3. Pathways of caspase activation and apoptosis
- •3.4. Apoptotic signaling in male germ cells
- •5. P38 MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE (MAPK) AND NITRIC OXIDE (NO)–MEDIATED INTRINSIC PATHWAY SIGNALING CONSTITUTES A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF APOPTOTIC SIGNALING IN MALE GERM CELLS AFTER HORMONE DEPRIVATION
- •11. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES
- •REFERENCES
- •26 Cell Death in the Cardiovascular System
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. CELL DEATH IN THE VASCULATURE
- •2.1. Apoptosis in the developing blood vessels
- •2.2. Apoptosis in atherosclerosis
- •2.2.1. Vascular smooth muscle cells
- •2.2.2. Macrophages
- •2.2.3. Regulation of apoptosis in atherosclerosis
- •2.2.4. Necrosis and autophagy in atherosclerosis
- •3. CELL DEATH IN THE MYOCARDIUM
- •3.1. Cell death in myocardial infarction
- •3.1.1. Apoptosis in myocardial infarction
- •3.1.2. Necrosis in myocardial infarction
- •3.1.3. Autophagy in myocardial infarction
- •3.2. Cell death in heart failure
- •3.2.1. Apoptosis in heart failure
- •3.2.2. Necrosis in heart failure
- •3.2.3. Autophagy in heart failure
- •4. CONCLUDING REMARKS
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- •REFERENCES
- •27 Cell Death Regulation in Muscle
- •1. INTRODUCTION TO MUSCLE
- •1.1. Skeletal muscle adaptation to endurance training
- •1.2. Myonuclear domains
- •2. MITOCHONDRIALLY MEDIATED APOPTOSIS IN MUSCLE
- •2.1. Skeletal muscle apoptotic susceptibility
- •4. APOPTOSIS IN MUSCLE DURING AGING AND DISEASE
- •4.1. Aging
- •4.2. Type 2 diabetes mellitus
- •4.3. Cancer cachexia
- •4.4. Chronic heart failure
- •6. CONCLUSION
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •28 Cell Death in the Skin
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. CELL DEATH IN SKIN HOMEOSTASIS
- •2.1. Cornification and apoptosis
- •2.2. Death receptors in the skin
- •3. CELL DEATH IN SKIN PATHOLOGY
- •3.1. Sunburn
- •3.2. Skin cancer
- •3.3. Necrolysis
- •3.4. Pemphigus
- •3.5. Eczema
- •3.6. Graft-versus-host disease
- •4. CONCLUDING REMARKS AND PERSPECTIVES
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •29 Apoptosis and Cell Survival in the Immune System
- •2.1. Survival of early hematopoietic progenitors
- •2.2. Sizing of the T-cell population
- •2.2.1. Establishing central tolerance
- •2.2.2. Peripheral tolerance
- •2.2.3. Memory T cells
- •2.3. Control of apoptosis in B-cell development
- •2.3.1. Early B-cell development
- •2.3.2. Deletion of autoreactive B cells
- •2.3.3. Survival and death of activated B cells
- •3. IMPAIRED APOPTOSIS AND LEUKEMOGENESIS
- •4. CONCLUSIONS
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- •REFERENCES
- •30 Cell Death Regulation in the Hematopoietic System
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLS
- •4. ERYTHROPOIESIS
- •5. MEGAKARYOPOIESIS
- •6. GRANULOPOIESIS
- •7. MONOPOIESIS
- •8. CONCLUSION
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- •REFERENCES
- •31 Apoptotic Cell Death in Sepsis
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. HOST INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE TO SEPSIS
- •3. CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS OF CELL DEATH IN SEPSIS
- •3.1. Sepsis-induced apoptosis
- •3.2. Necrotic cell death in sepsis
- •4.1. Central role of apoptosis in sepsis mortality: immune effector cells and gut epithelium
- •4.2. Apoptotic pathways in sepsis-induced immune cell death
- •4.3. Investigations implicating the extrinsic apoptotic pathway in sepsis
- •4.4. Investigations implicating the intrinsic apoptotic pathway in sepsis
- •5. THE EFFECT OF APOPTOSIS ON THE IMMUNE SYSTEM
- •5.1. Cellular effects of an increased apoptotic burdens
- •5.2. Network effects of selective loss of immune cell types
- •5.3. Studies of immunomodulation by apoptotic cells in other fields
- •7. CONCLUSION
- •REFERENCES
- •32 Host–Pathogen Interactions
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. FROM THE PATHOGEN PERSPECTIVE
- •2.1. Commensals versus pathogens
- •2.2. Pathogen strategies to infect the host
- •3. HOST DEFENSE
- •3.1. Antimicrobial peptides
- •3.2. PRRs and inflammation
- •3.2.1. TLRs
- •3.2.2. NLRs
- •3.2.3. The Nod signalosome
- •3.2.4. The inflammasome
- •3.3. Cell death
- •3.3.1. Apoptosis and pathogen clearance
- •3.3.2. Pyroptosis
- •3.2.3. Caspase-independent cell death
- •3.2.4. Autophagy and autophagic cell death
- •4. CONCLUSIONS
- •REFERENCES
- •Part III Cell Death in Nonmammalian Organisms
- •1. PHENOTYPE AND ASSAYS OF YEAST APOPTOSIS
- •2.1. Pheromone-induced cell death
- •2.1.1. Colony growth
- •2.1.2. Killer-induced cell death
- •3. EXTERNAL STIMULI THAT INDUCE APOPTOSIS IN YEAST
- •4. THE GENETICS OF YEAST APOPTOSIS
- •5. PROGRAMMED AND ALTRUISTIC AGING
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •34 Caenorhabditis elegans and Apoptosis
- •1. Overview
- •2. KILLING
- •3. SPECIFICATION
- •4. EXECUTION
- •4.1. DNA degradation
- •4.2. Mitochondrial elimination
- •4.3. Engulfment
- •5. SUMMARY
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •35 Apoptotic Cell Death in Drosophila
- •2. DROSOPHILA CASPASES AND PROXIMAL REGULATORS
- •6. CLOSING COMMENTS
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •36 Analysis of Cell Death in Zebrafish
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. WHY USE ZEBRAFISH TO STUDY CELL DEATH?
- •2.2. Molecular techniques to rapidly assess gene function in embryos
- •2.2.1. Studies of gene function using microinjections into early embryos
- •2.2.2. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry
- •2.3. Forward genetic screening
- •2.4. Drug and small-molecule screening
- •2.5. Transgenesis
- •2.6. Targeted knockouts
- •3.1. Intrinsic apoptosis
- •3.2. Extrinsic apoptosis
- •3.3. Chk-1 suppressed apoptosis
- •3.4. Anoikis
- •3.5. Autophagy
- •3.6. Necrosis
- •4. DEVELOPMENTAL CELL DEATH IN ZEBRAFISH EMBRYOS
- •5. THE P53 PATHWAY
- •6. PERSPECTIVES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
- •SUGGESTED READING
9Ceramide and Lipid Mediators in Apoptosis
Thomas D. Mullen, Russell W. Jenkins, Lina M. Obeid, and Yusuf A. Hannun
1. INTRODUCTION
As a cellular signaling program, apoptosis is a highly controlled and complex process that depends on the orchestrated interactions of multiple soluble factors: ions (e.g., Ca2+ ), proteins (e.g., caspases, Bcl-2 family members), and nonprotein substrates (e.g., DNA). Equally important, although less well characterized, is signaling through cellular membranes and the lipids and proteins contained therein. Lipids are the primary constituents of biological membranes and thus play a structural role in defining cellular and organellar boundaries. However, lipids are not merely passive molecules serving inert, structural functions in these membranes. Many lipids are now appreciated as signaling molecules, capable of influencing diverse cellular processes and exerting powerful influence over many physiologic and pathophysiologic processes, such as programmed cell death. Sphingolipids represent one class of bioactive lipid mediators that are now recognized as key determinants of cell fate. This chapter discusses the regulated generation of bioactive sphingolipids (e.g., ceramide) and how sphingolipid signaling impacts the regulation of programmed cell death.
Lipid signaling is the control of cellular function through the modulation of membrane lipid composition. Although a full discussion of cellular lipid composition would require its own textbook, a few general concepts should be presented. In most metazoan cells, the predominant classes of lipids are the glycerolipids, sphingolipids, sterols, and eicosanoids. Major glycerolipid species include phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylserine (PS), and phosphatidylinositol, and important minor species are diacylglycerol (DAG), phosphatidic acid, lysophosphatidic acid, and the phosphatidylinositol phosphates
(PIPs). Sphingomyelin (SM) and glycosphingolipids (GSL), such as glucosylceramide (GlcCer) and gangliosides, make up the bulk of the cellular sphingolipid repertoire. Ceramide is comparatively less abundant, and sphingosine and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) are found at even lower levels. Of the sterols, cholesterol is the most abundant. Finally, the highly diverse class of lipids known as eicosanoids (i.e., metabolites of arachidonic acid) are involved in the regulation of a multitude of physiologic processes – most notably, inflammation. Clearly, for cellular signaling, the eukaryotic cell has an immense array of lipids at its disposal.
Cells accomplish signaling through lipids via several mechanisms, but the simplest signaling paradigm is based on the production of a bioactive lipid from an inert, high-abundance precursor. For example, in G protein-coupled receptor signaling, phos- phatidylinositol-(4,5)-phosphate (PIP2) is hydrolyzed by phospholipase C (PLC) to form DAG and inositol-(3,4,5)- triphosphate (IP3). DAG proceeds to bind to protein kinase C (PKC), recruiting it to the membrane, allowing its activation, and promoting a signaling cascade. Other bioactive lipid/precursor pairs are included in Table 9-1. However, it must be understood that the terms bioactive and inert are relativistic and depend on the context and biology in question.
Many lipids are involved in the regulation of cell death. Lipids such as DAG, phosphoinositides, and S1P generally oppose proapoptotic pathways, whereas lipids such as ceramide and sphingosine can promote these pathways. Although tremendously important in the regulation of cell fate, lipid-mediated pathways of cell growth and survival (e.g., phosphoinositide-3-kinase [PI3K]/Akt pathways, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor signaling) are not discussed at length in this chapter. Another topic that is not elaborated on is that of PS
88
CERAMIDE AND LIPID MEDIATORS IN APOPTOSIS |
89 |
Table 9-1. Signaling lipids and their precursors
Precursor of signaling molecule(s) |
Signaling molecule(s) |
(greater abundance) |
(lesser abundance) |
|
|
PIP2 |
DAG, IP3 |
SM |
Ceramide |
Glucosylceramide |
Ceramide |
Phosphatidic acid |
Lysophosphatidic acid |
Ceramide |
Ceramide-1-phosphate |
|
Sphingosine |
Sphingosine |
Sphingosine-1- |
|
phosphate |
Arachidonic acid-containing |
Eicosanoids |
glycerophospholipids |
|
exposure on the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane and its role in the recognition of apoptotic cell fragments by macrophages. Instead we focus on the lipids and pathways that have been shown to play largely proapoptotic signaling roles.
In this chapter, we mostly examine the roles of ceramide in the regulation of apoptosis. The aims of this
chapter are to (1) introduce the pertinent sphingolipids, metabolic enzymes, and basic properties and precepts essential for understanding the complex role of sphingolipids as signaling molecules; (2) review the evidence supporting a role for sphingolipids in the apoptotic program; (3) highlight studies that illustrate the vital role of ceramide in apoptosis-related disease; and (4) present a few of the many remaining unanswered questions concerning sphingolipids in cell death.
2. SPHINGOLIPID METABOLISM: CONSTITUENTS,
COMPARTMENTALIZATION, AND KEY CONCEPTS
The synthesis of all sphingolipids depends on the de novo formation of ceramide, which occurs by a series of catalytic steps (Figure 9-1). The rate-limiting step of sphingolipid synthesis occurs when serine and palmitoylCoA are condensed by the enzyme serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT) to form 3-ketosphinganine – a transient metabolite that is readily converted to dihydrosphingosine (also known as sphinganine). Dihydrosphingosine is then subject to acylation by ceramide synthases (CerSes). Fatty acyl chains are transferred from
ER |
serine + palmitoyl-CoA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
serine palmitoyl transferase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-ketosphinganine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-ketoreductase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H |
O H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dihydrosphingosine |
|
|
O H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceramide synthase |
acyl-CoA H |
2 N |
H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H |
O H |
Golgi |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
dihydroceramide |
|
|
O H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N H H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
r |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lCe |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/G |
|
|
|
e |
|||
|
|
O |
|
lc |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
G |
|
|
|
|
|
s |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
th |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
n |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
desaturase |
|
|
|
y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H |
O H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ca |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G |
|
|
|
|
|
glycosphingolipids
|
ceramide |
|
Lysosomes or |
rCDase |
ceramide synthase |
other compartments fatty acid |
acyl-CoA |
|
sphingosine 



sphingosine kinase 

sphingosine-1-phosphate 



S1P lyase
O H
|
|
|
N H H |
|
|
|
O |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
E |
|
|
CDase |
|
|
R |
|
|
|
K |
|
|
H |
O H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
O H |
|
H 2 N |
H |
|
|
|
S1Pase |
|
|
|
|
H |
O H |
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
P O H |
H 2 N |
H |
|
O |
|
SM |
|
|
sy |
|
|
nt |
|
|
ha |
|
|
|
se |
|
S |
|
|
M |
|
|
as |
|
sphingomyelin |
e |
|
|
ceramide-1-phosphate
ethanolamine-1-phosphate + hexadecanal
Figure 9-1. Sphingolipid metabolism. Serine and palmitoyl-CoA are condensed by SPT to form 3- ketosphinganine, which is subsequently metabolized to dihydrosphingosine. Dihydrosphingosine is a substrate for acylation by CerS, producing dihydroceramide. Dihydroceramide desaturase reduces dihydroceramide to form ceramide. Ceramide is then tra cked to the Golgi apparatus, where it is the substrate for the synthesis of more complex sphingolipids. Although not exclusively, the breakdown of complex sphingolipids can proceed via lysosomal pathways, which ultimately result in the production of free sphingosine. Sphingosine can be the substrate for either CerSes or sphingosine kinases to form ceramide and S1P, respectively.
90 |
THOMAS D. MULLEN, RUSSELL W. JENKINS, LINA M. OBEID, AND YUSUF A. HANNUN |
Plasma membrane
|
|
|
|
|
se |
nCDase |
|
|
|
Ma |
|
||
|
|
|
aS |
|
Cer |
Sph |
|
|
SM |
|
|
||
|
L |
|
|
Cer |
Sph |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
M |
GS |
SM |
|
|
||
S |
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mas |
|
|
|
|
|
nS |
|
|
|
S1P
SK
SM
SM
GSL
Golgi
SM
L S G
GSL
Lysosomes
Cer
aSMase
SM
|
S |
|
CS |
|
|
|
|
MS |
G |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r |
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
C |
|
C |
|
|
|
|
er |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CERT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r |
Des |
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
dH |
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
Serine |
|
r |
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
ER |
|
+ |
|
h |
|
|
|
|
palmitoyl-CoA |
|
p |
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
||
H |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
d |
|
|
|
|
|
Cer
Sph
CerS
SK
SPP
hpS |
aCDase |
GSL |
C |
|
|
|
|
r |
|
|
e |
GCase |
|
|
|
e |
|
|
r |
|
|
C |
|
|
||
|
|
|
lc |
|
|
|
|
S1P |
|
G |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ia |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d |
|
|
|
|
|
|
n |
h |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
p |
|
|
|
|
h |
|
? |
S |
|
|
|
c |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
to |
|
|
|
r |
|
|
|
i |
|
|
e |
|
||
|
M |
|
|
|
|
||
|
? |
C |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
S |
|
M |
|
|
|
|
|
P |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
L |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
P |
T |
|
||
|
|
Nucleus
M A
M s
Figure 9-2. Compartmentalization of sphingolipid metabolism. Most enzymes of de novo sphingolipid synthesis reside in the ER. Here, ceramide is formed and then transported to the Golgi apparatus by vesicular tra cking, as well as nonvesicular transport via the ceramide transfer protein CERT. In the Golgi, ceramide is metabolized to complex sphingolipids, which are distributed to the plasma membrane and the endosomal compartments. Degradation and recycling of sphingolipids proceeds through endocytosis and transfer to the lysosomes, where many sphingolipid-metabolizing enzymes reside. Lysosome-derived sphingosine may be recycled into ceramide directly, or it may be converted by SK to the more hydrophilic S1P and subsequently dephosphorylated by S1P phosphatase. S1P may be also degraded via S1P lyase at the ER. aCDase, acid ceramidase; aSMase, acid sphingomyelinase; Cer, ceramide; CERT, ceramide transfer protein; dHCer, dihydroceramide; dHSph, dihydrosphingosine; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; GCS, glucosylceramide synthase; GSL, glycosphingolipids; nSMase, neutral sphingomyelinase; MAMs, mitochondria-associated membranes; S1P, sphingosine- 1-phosphate; SM, sphingomyelin; SK, sphingosine kinase; SMase, sphingomyelinase; SMS, SM synthase; Sph, sphingosine; SPP, S1P phosphatase; SPT, serine palmitoyltransferase. See Color Plate 8.
acyl-coenzyme (acyl-CoA) onto the free amine group of dihydrosphingosine producing dihydroceramide. Dihydroceramide is subsequently reduced by dihydroceramide desaturase to form ceramide.
The cellular compartmentalization of sphingolipid metabolism is as important as the individual biochemical reactions (Figure 9-2). The early steps of sphingolipid biosynthesis are largely confined to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). With some exceptions, most enzymes (e.g., SPT, CerSes) of the de novo synthetic pathway are found exclusively in this organelle. Ceramide formed in the ER must then be transferred to the Golgi complex via vesicular and nonvesicular trafficking for metabolism into complex sphingolipids such as SM, glucosylceramide, and gangliosides. The degradation of complex sphingolipids proceeds primarily in the endo-lysosomal compartment, yielding free sphingosine. Sphingosine can be phosphorylated to S1P, or it may be re-acylated to form ceramide – a process known as the salvage pathway.
Although a detailed assessment of the many complexities of sphingolipid metabolism is beyond the scope of this chapter, several key concepts should be emphasized. First, and most apparent from the metabolic scheme, is that ceramide occupies a central position in sphingolipid metabolism and represents a “hub” in sphingolipid synthesis, degradation, and interconversion. As a metabolic intermediate, ceramide may seem like an unlikely candidate for a signaling molecule. However, when one considers the compartmentalization of the enzymes of ceramide metabolism, it becomes apparent that ceramide is uniquely positioned to behave as a signaling lipid. Because ceramide is both substrate and product of multiple enzymes, its levels represent a balance between synthetic and degradative processes that must be highly regulated. Furthermore, multiple sphingolipid enzymes, including sphingomyelinases (SMases), CerSes, and ceramidases (CDases), exhibit unique localization and allow for ceramide levels to
CERAMIDE AND LIPID MEDIATORS IN APOPTOSIS |
91 |
Box 9-1. Methods of sphingolipid analysis I: Diacylglycerol kinase assay
The diacylglycerol kinase (DGK) assay has been long used as a means of measuring ceramide and continues to be the standard in many labs today. In this assay, ceramides are extracted and labeled with [γ-32P]ATP at the 1-OH position using the diacylglycerol kinase from Escherichia coli. Labeled ceramides are analyzed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC), and radioactivity can be measured through scintillation counting. Although relatively straightforward, drawbacks of the standard DGK assay include the requirement for radioisotopes, the inability to easily distinguish dihydroceramide from ceramide, and the lack of resolution of specific ceramide species (e.g., C16- vs. C18-ceramide). Sphingolipids are also measured by metabolic labeling using radiolabeled sphingolipid precursors. For example, cells can be incubated with either [3H]-serine or [3H]-palmitate to label sphingolipids and determine metabolic flux through the de novo pathway. Radiolabeled dihydrosphingosine or sphingosine can be used to track metabolic flux through CerS or SK. Like the DGK assay, experiments using labeling require extraction of lipids and analyzed by TLC and scintillation counting.
Lipid extract
|
DGK |
|
|
Solubilization |
+ |
|
|
[γ -32P]ATP |
|
|
|
in mixed |
DGK |
PA |
|
micelles |
DAG |
||
|
Cer |
|
C1P |
TLC & autoradiography
Doxo |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
Quantification by |
|
scintillation counting |
||||||
Myr - |
- |
+ |
+ |
|||
|
||||||
PA
C1P 
Origin 

Solvent migration
Scraping
ceramide (cpm) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doxo |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
|
||||
Myr - |
- |
+ |
+ |
|
|||||
Figure B9-1. Schematic representation of DGK method for ceramide quantification. Lipid extracts are prepared from any source, and samples and standards are reconstituted in detergent-containing micelles and incubated with DGK and [γ-32P]ATP. The lipids are separated by TLC. Bands corresponding to ceramide-1-phosphate (C1P) are scraped, and radioactivity is quantified by scintillation counting.
be differentially regulated in the subcompartments of the cell. Thus the concept of compartmentalization of ceramide metabolism emerges as a second and key concept in analyzing ceramide function. Accordingly, ceramide function needs to be considered in a pathwayspecific and compartment-specific manner, which is further corroborated by the molecular heterogeneity of ceramide species that may localize to distinct compartments.
The third key concept – that of metabolic flux – also relies on an understanding of the various sphingolipid enzymes and their compartmentalization. On detecting elevations in ceramide, it is insufficient to consider just one enzyme as a source of ceramide; instead, the cause(s) of ceramide accumulation must be addressed both in terms of its generation (e.g., from
SM hydrolysis) and its catabolism (e.g., by a ceramidase). Although such consideration has been previously arduous from an experimental perspective, new tools and knowledge of the multiple sphingolipid enzymes are making complex sphingolipid analyses possible (Boxes 9-1 and 9-2).
3. SPHINGOLIPIDS AS MEDIATORS OF
APOPTOTIC SIGNALING
The current synthesis of the role of sphingolipids in the regulation and execution of cell death signaling incorporates 17 years of research and more than 2,500 publications. An understanding of the role of ceramide in cellular signaling first requires an understanding of signaling paradigms. Basic cellular signaling involves the
