
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Part I General Principles of Cell Death
- •1 Human Caspases – Apoptosis and Inflammation Signaling Proteases
- •1.1. Apoptosis and limited proteolysis
- •1.2. Caspase evolution
- •2. ACTIVATION MECHANISMS
- •2.2. The activation platforms
- •2.4. Proteolytic maturation
- •3. CASPASE SUBSTRATES
- •4. REGULATION BY NATURAL INHIBITORS
- •REFERENCES
- •2 Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins
- •2. CELLULAR FUNCTIONS AND PHENOTYPES OF IAP
- •3. IN VIVO FUNCTIONS OF IAP FAMILY PROTEINS
- •4. SUBCELLULAR LOCATIONS OF IAP
- •8. IAP–IAP INTERACTIONS
- •10. ENDOGENOUS ANTAGONISTS OF IAP
- •11. IAPs AND DISEASE
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2.1. The CD95 (Fas/APO-1) system
- •2.1.1. CD95 and CD95L: discovery of the first direct apoptosis-inducing receptor-ligand system
- •2.1.2. Biochemistry of CD95 apoptosis signaling
- •2.2. The TRAIL (Apo2L) system
- •3.1. The TNF system
- •3.1.1. Biochemistry of TNF signal transduction
- •3.1.2. TNF and TNF blockers in the clinic
- •3.2. The DR3 system
- •4. THE DR6 SYSTEM
- •6. CONCLUDING REMARKS AND OUTLOOK
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •4 Mitochondria and Cell Death
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. MITOCHONDRIAL PHYSIOLOGY
- •3. THE MITOCHONDRIAL PATHWAY OF APOPTOSIS
- •9. CONCLUSIONS
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •3. INHIBITING APOPTOSIS
- •4. INHIBITING THE INHIBITORS
- •6. THE BCL-2 FAMILY AND CANCER
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •6 Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response in Cell Death and Cell Survival
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. THE ESR IN YEAST
- •3. THE ESR IN MAMMALS
- •4. THE ESR AND CELL DEATH
- •5. THE ESR IN DEVELOPMENT AND TISSUE HOMEOSTASIS
- •6. THE ESR IN HUMAN DISEASE
- •7. CONCLUSION
- •7 Autophagy – The Liaison between the Lysosomal System and Cell Death
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. AUTOPHAGY
- •2.2. Physiologic functions of autophagy
- •2.3. Autophagy and human pathology
- •3. AUTOPHAGY AND CELL DEATH
- •3.1. Autophagy as anti–cell death mechanism
- •3.2. Autophagy as a cell death mechanism
- •3.3. Molecular players of the autophagy–cell death cross-talk
- •4. AUTOPHAGY, CELLULAR DEATH, AND CANCER
- •5. CONCLUDING REMARKS AND PENDING QUESTIONS
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •8 Cell Death in Response to Genotoxic Stress and DNA Damage
- •1. TYPES OF DNA DAMAGE AND REPAIR SYSTEMS
- •2. DNA DAMAGE RESPONSE
- •2.2. Transducers
- •2.3. Effectors
- •4. CHROMATIN MODIFICATIONS
- •5. CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT REGULATION
- •6. WHEN REPAIR FAILS: SENESCENCE VERSUS APOPTOSIS
- •6.1. DNA damage response and the induction of apoptosis
- •6.2. p53-independent mechanisms of apoptosis
- •6.3. DNA damage response and senescence induction
- •7. DNA DAMAGE FROM OXIDATIVE STRESS
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •9 Ceramide and Lipid Mediators in Apoptosis
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •3.1. Basic cell signaling often involves small molecules
- •3.2. Sphingolipids are cell-signaling molecules
- •3.2.1. Ceramide induces apoptosis
- •3.2.2. Ceramide accumulates during programmed cell death
- •3.2.3. Inhibition of ceramide production alters cell death signaling
- •4.1. Ceramide is generated through SM hydrolysis
- •4.3. aSMase can be activated independently of extracellular receptors to regulate apoptosis
- •4.4. Controversial aspects of the role of aSMase in apoptosis
- •4.5. De novo ceramide synthesis regulates programmed cell death
- •4.6. p53 and Bcl-2–like proteins are connected to de novo ceramide synthesis
- •4.7. The role and regulation of de novo synthesis in ceramide-mediated cell death is poorly understood
- •5. CONCLUDING REMARKS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
- •5.1. Who? (Which enzyme?)
- •5.2. What? (Which ceramide?)
- •5.3. Where? (Which compartment?)
- •5.4. When? (At what steps?)
- •5.5. How? (Through what mechanisms?)
- •5.6. What purpose?
- •6. SUMMARY
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •1. General Introduction
- •1.1. Cytotoxic lymphocytes and apoptosis
- •2. CYTOTOXIC GRANULES AND GRANULE EXOCYTOSIS
- •2.1. Synthesis and loading of the cytotoxic granule proteins into the secretory granules
- •2.2. The immunological synapse
- •2.3. Secretion of granule proteins
- •2.4. Uptake of proapoptotic proteins into the target cell
- •2.5. Activation of death pathways by granzymes
- •3. GRANULE-BOUND CYTOTOXIC PROTEINS
- •3.1. Perforin
- •3.2. Granulysin
- •3.3. Granzymes
- •3.3.1. GrB-mediated apoptosis
- •3.3.2. GrA-mediated cell death
- •3.3.3. Orphan granzyme-mediated cell death
- •5. CONCLUSIONS
- •REFERENCES
- •Part II Cell Death in Tissues and Organs
- •1.1. Death by trophic factor deprivation
- •1.2. Key molecules regulating neuronal apoptosis during development
- •1.2.1. Roles of caspases and Apaf-1 in neuronal cell death
- •1.2.2. Role of Bcl-2 family members in neuronal cell death
- •1.3. Signal transduction from neurotrophins and neurotrophin receptors
- •1.3.1. Signals for survival
- •1.3.2. Signals for death
- •2.1. Apoptosis in neurodegenerative diseases
- •2.1.4. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- •2.2. Necrotic cell death in neurodegenerative diseases
- •2.2.1. Calpains
- •2.2.2. Cathepsins
- •3. CONCLUSIONS
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENT
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENT
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •5. S-NITROSYLATION OF PARKIN
- •7. POTENTIAL TREATMENT OF EXCESSIVE NMDA-INDUCED Ca2+ INFLUX AND FREE RADICAL GENERATION
- •8. FUTURE THERAPEUTICS: NITROMEMANTINES
- •9. CONCLUSIONS
- •Acknowledgments
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •3. MITOCHONDRIAL PERMEABILITY TRANSITION ACTIVATED BY Ca2+ AND OXIDATIVE STRESS
- •4.1. Mitochondrial apoptotic pathways
- •4.2. Bcl-2 family proteins
- •4.3. Caspase-dependent apoptosis
- •4.4. Caspase-independent apoptosis
- •4.5. Calpains in ischemic neural cell death
- •5. SUMMARY
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. HISTORICAL ANTECEDENTS
- •7.1. Activation of p21 waf1/cip1: Targeting extrinsic and intrinsic pathways to death
- •8. CONCLUSION
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- •REFERENCES
- •16 Apoptosis and Homeostasis in the Eye
- •1.1. Lens
- •1.2. Retina
- •2. ROLE OF APOPTOSIS IN DISEASES OF THE EYE
- •2.1. Glaucoma
- •2.2. Age-related macular degeneration
- •4. APOPTOSIS AND OCULAR IMMUNE PRIVILEGE
- •5. CONCLUSIONS
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •17 Cell Death in the Inner Ear
- •3. THE COCHLEA IS THE HEARING ORGAN
- •3.1. Ototoxic hair cell death
- •3.2. Aminoglycoside-induced hair cell death
- •3.3. Cisplatin-induced hair cell death
- •3.4. Therapeutic strategies to prevent hair cell death
- •3.5. Challenges to studies of hair cell death
- •4. SPIRAL GANGLION NEURON DEATH
- •4.1. Neurotrophic support from sensory hair cells and supporting cells
- •4.2. Afferent activity from hair cells
- •4.3. Molecular manifestations of spiral ganglion neuron death
- •4.4. Therapeutic interventions to prevent SGN death
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •18 Cell Death in the Olfactory System
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Anatomical Aspects
- •3. Life and Death in the Olfactory System
- •3.1. Olfactory epithelium
- •3.2. Olfactory bulb
- •REFERENCES
- •1. Introduction
- •3.1. Beta cell death in the development of T1D
- •3.2. Mechanisms of beta cell death in type 1 diabetes
- •3.2.1. Apoptosis signaling pathways downstream of death receptors and inflammatory cytokines
- •3.2.2. Oxidative stress
- •3.3. Mechanisms of beta cell death in type 2 diabetes
- •3.3.1. Glucolipitoxicity
- •3.3.2. Endoplasmic reticulum stress
- •5. SUMMARY
- •Acknowledgments
- •REFERENCES
- •20 Apoptosis in the Physiology and Diseases of the Respiratory Tract
- •1. APOPTOSIS IN LUNG DEVELOPMENT
- •2. APOPTOSIS IN LUNG PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
- •2.1. Apoptosis in pulmonary inflammation
- •2.2. Apoptosis in acute lung injury
- •2.3. Apoptosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- •2.4. Apoptosis in interstitial lung diseases
- •2.5. Apoptosis in pulmonary arterial hypertension
- •2.6. Apoptosis in lung cancer
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •21 Regulation of Cell Death in the Gastrointestinal Tract
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. ESOPHAGUS
- •3. STOMACH
- •4. SMALL AND LARGE INTESTINE
- •5. LIVER
- •6. PANCREAS
- •7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUDING REMARKS
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •22 Apoptosis in the Kidney
- •1. NORMAL KIDNEY STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
- •3. APOPTOSIS IN ADULT KIDNEY DISEASE
- •4. REGULATION OF APOPTOSIS IN KIDNEY CELLS
- •4.1. Survival factors
- •4.2. Lethal factors
- •4.2.1. TNF superfamily cytokines
- •4.2.2. Other cytokines
- •4.2.3. Glucose
- •4.2.4. Drugs and xenobiotics
- •4.2.5. Ischemia-reperfusion and sepsis
- •5. THERAPEUTIC APPROACHES
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. APOPTOSIS IN THE NORMAL BREAST
- •2.1. Occurrence and role of apoptosis in the developing breast
- •2.2.2. Death ligands and death receptor pathway
- •2.2.4. LIF-STAT3 proapoptotic signaling
- •2.2.5. IGF survival signaling
- •2.2.6. Regulation by adhesion
- •2.2.7. PI3K/AKT pathway: molecular hub for survival signals
- •2.2.8. Downstream regulators of apoptosis: the BCL-2 family members
- •3. APOPTOSIS IN BREAST CANCER
- •3.1. Apoptosis in breast tumorigenesis and cancer progression
- •3.2. Molecular dysregulation of apoptosis in breast cancer
- •3.2.1. Altered expression of death ligands and their receptors in breast cancer
- •3.2.2. Deregulation of prosurvival growth factors and their receptors
- •3.2.3. Alterations in cell adhesion and resistance to anoikis
- •3.2.4. Enhanced activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway in breast cancer
- •3.2.5. p53 inactivation in breast cancer
- •3.2.6. Altered expression of BCL-2 family of proteins in breast cancer
- •5. CONCLUSION
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. DETECTING CELL DEATH IN THE FEMALE GONADS
- •4. APOPTOSIS AND FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE AGING
- •6. CONCLUDING REMARKS
- •REFERENCES
- •25 Apoptotic Signaling in Male Germ Cells
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •3.1. Murine models
- •3.2. Primate models
- •3.3. Pathways of caspase activation and apoptosis
- •3.4. Apoptotic signaling in male germ cells
- •5. P38 MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE (MAPK) AND NITRIC OXIDE (NO)–MEDIATED INTRINSIC PATHWAY SIGNALING CONSTITUTES A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF APOPTOTIC SIGNALING IN MALE GERM CELLS AFTER HORMONE DEPRIVATION
- •11. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES
- •REFERENCES
- •26 Cell Death in the Cardiovascular System
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. CELL DEATH IN THE VASCULATURE
- •2.1. Apoptosis in the developing blood vessels
- •2.2. Apoptosis in atherosclerosis
- •2.2.1. Vascular smooth muscle cells
- •2.2.2. Macrophages
- •2.2.3. Regulation of apoptosis in atherosclerosis
- •2.2.4. Necrosis and autophagy in atherosclerosis
- •3. CELL DEATH IN THE MYOCARDIUM
- •3.1. Cell death in myocardial infarction
- •3.1.1. Apoptosis in myocardial infarction
- •3.1.2. Necrosis in myocardial infarction
- •3.1.3. Autophagy in myocardial infarction
- •3.2. Cell death in heart failure
- •3.2.1. Apoptosis in heart failure
- •3.2.2. Necrosis in heart failure
- •3.2.3. Autophagy in heart failure
- •4. CONCLUDING REMARKS
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- •REFERENCES
- •27 Cell Death Regulation in Muscle
- •1. INTRODUCTION TO MUSCLE
- •1.1. Skeletal muscle adaptation to endurance training
- •1.2. Myonuclear domains
- •2. MITOCHONDRIALLY MEDIATED APOPTOSIS IN MUSCLE
- •2.1. Skeletal muscle apoptotic susceptibility
- •4. APOPTOSIS IN MUSCLE DURING AGING AND DISEASE
- •4.1. Aging
- •4.2. Type 2 diabetes mellitus
- •4.3. Cancer cachexia
- •4.4. Chronic heart failure
- •6. CONCLUSION
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •28 Cell Death in the Skin
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. CELL DEATH IN SKIN HOMEOSTASIS
- •2.1. Cornification and apoptosis
- •2.2. Death receptors in the skin
- •3. CELL DEATH IN SKIN PATHOLOGY
- •3.1. Sunburn
- •3.2. Skin cancer
- •3.3. Necrolysis
- •3.4. Pemphigus
- •3.5. Eczema
- •3.6. Graft-versus-host disease
- •4. CONCLUDING REMARKS AND PERSPECTIVES
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •29 Apoptosis and Cell Survival in the Immune System
- •2.1. Survival of early hematopoietic progenitors
- •2.2. Sizing of the T-cell population
- •2.2.1. Establishing central tolerance
- •2.2.2. Peripheral tolerance
- •2.2.3. Memory T cells
- •2.3. Control of apoptosis in B-cell development
- •2.3.1. Early B-cell development
- •2.3.2. Deletion of autoreactive B cells
- •2.3.3. Survival and death of activated B cells
- •3. IMPAIRED APOPTOSIS AND LEUKEMOGENESIS
- •4. CONCLUSIONS
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- •REFERENCES
- •30 Cell Death Regulation in the Hematopoietic System
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLS
- •4. ERYTHROPOIESIS
- •5. MEGAKARYOPOIESIS
- •6. GRANULOPOIESIS
- •7. MONOPOIESIS
- •8. CONCLUSION
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- •REFERENCES
- •31 Apoptotic Cell Death in Sepsis
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. HOST INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE TO SEPSIS
- •3. CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS OF CELL DEATH IN SEPSIS
- •3.1. Sepsis-induced apoptosis
- •3.2. Necrotic cell death in sepsis
- •4.1. Central role of apoptosis in sepsis mortality: immune effector cells and gut epithelium
- •4.2. Apoptotic pathways in sepsis-induced immune cell death
- •4.3. Investigations implicating the extrinsic apoptotic pathway in sepsis
- •4.4. Investigations implicating the intrinsic apoptotic pathway in sepsis
- •5. THE EFFECT OF APOPTOSIS ON THE IMMUNE SYSTEM
- •5.1. Cellular effects of an increased apoptotic burdens
- •5.2. Network effects of selective loss of immune cell types
- •5.3. Studies of immunomodulation by apoptotic cells in other fields
- •7. CONCLUSION
- •REFERENCES
- •32 Host–Pathogen Interactions
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. FROM THE PATHOGEN PERSPECTIVE
- •2.1. Commensals versus pathogens
- •2.2. Pathogen strategies to infect the host
- •3. HOST DEFENSE
- •3.1. Antimicrobial peptides
- •3.2. PRRs and inflammation
- •3.2.1. TLRs
- •3.2.2. NLRs
- •3.2.3. The Nod signalosome
- •3.2.4. The inflammasome
- •3.3. Cell death
- •3.3.1. Apoptosis and pathogen clearance
- •3.3.2. Pyroptosis
- •3.2.3. Caspase-independent cell death
- •3.2.4. Autophagy and autophagic cell death
- •4. CONCLUSIONS
- •REFERENCES
- •Part III Cell Death in Nonmammalian Organisms
- •1. PHENOTYPE AND ASSAYS OF YEAST APOPTOSIS
- •2.1. Pheromone-induced cell death
- •2.1.1. Colony growth
- •2.1.2. Killer-induced cell death
- •3. EXTERNAL STIMULI THAT INDUCE APOPTOSIS IN YEAST
- •4. THE GENETICS OF YEAST APOPTOSIS
- •5. PROGRAMMED AND ALTRUISTIC AGING
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •34 Caenorhabditis elegans and Apoptosis
- •1. Overview
- •2. KILLING
- •3. SPECIFICATION
- •4. EXECUTION
- •4.1. DNA degradation
- •4.2. Mitochondrial elimination
- •4.3. Engulfment
- •5. SUMMARY
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •35 Apoptotic Cell Death in Drosophila
- •2. DROSOPHILA CASPASES AND PROXIMAL REGULATORS
- •6. CLOSING COMMENTS
- •SUGGESTED READINGS
- •36 Analysis of Cell Death in Zebrafish
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •2. WHY USE ZEBRAFISH TO STUDY CELL DEATH?
- •2.2. Molecular techniques to rapidly assess gene function in embryos
- •2.2.1. Studies of gene function using microinjections into early embryos
- •2.2.2. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry
- •2.3. Forward genetic screening
- •2.4. Drug and small-molecule screening
- •2.5. Transgenesis
- •2.6. Targeted knockouts
- •3.1. Intrinsic apoptosis
- •3.2. Extrinsic apoptosis
- •3.3. Chk-1 suppressed apoptosis
- •3.4. Anoikis
- •3.5. Autophagy
- •3.6. Necrosis
- •4. DEVELOPMENTAL CELL DEATH IN ZEBRAFISH EMBRYOS
- •5. THE P53 PATHWAY
- •6. PERSPECTIVES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
- •SUGGESTED READING
7Autophagy – The Liaison between the Lysosomal System and Cell Death
Hiroshi Koga and Ana Maria Cuervo
1. INTRODUCTION
The involvement of lysosomes, the organelle with the highest concentration of hydrolases, in cellular death has been extensively analyzed in different contexts in the past. In many of those studies, lysosomes were proposed to play a “passive” role in the cellular death process, resulting from the leakage of potent lysosomal enzymes into the cytosol. In fact, rupture of the lysosomal membrane after various types of cellular injury or under certain pathological conditions can lead to both apoptotic and nonapoptotic cell death. For example, lysomotropic agents, certain lipid products such as sphingosine or ceramide, a wide variety of death stimuli such as death receptor activation, p53 activation, microtubule-stabilizing agents, oxidative stress, and growth factor deprivation induce lysosomal permeabilization and the release of lysosomal proteases, generically known as cathepsins, into the cytosol. Studies using both genetic and pharmacological blockage of cathepsins support that cytosolic release of these lysosomal hydrolases can mediate caspase-dependent and -independent cell death.
The involvement of lysosomes in cellular death has recently been revisited, and a more active role for this organelle has been proposed. The main drive for this re-evaluation has been the recent advances in our understanding of one of the basic lysosomal functions: autophagy, or the self-digestion of intracellular components by lysosomes. In contrast to the “passive” role in cell death in which lysosomes are merely the carriers of the damaging enzymes that are released into the cytosol, in recent years a direct contribution of lysosomes as intact and properly functioning organelles to cell death has been proposed. The concept of autophagic cell death, however, is not new for cell death researchers.
In fact, this term has been extensively used in the classification of programmed cell death types based on morphological features (Figure 7-1). Thus, whereas in cell death type I or apoptotic cell death, the signature features are condensation of the nucleus and cytoplasm, DNA fragmentation, and early collapse of cytoskeletal elements, but preservation of organelles until late stages, the term cell death type II, or autophagic cell death, has been reserved for dying cells in which the presence of autophagosomes and autophagolysosomes – vesicular compartments related to autophagy – are the predominant morphological feature. In this case, early degradation of organelles but preservation of cytoskeletal elements until late stages are the signature features.
This connection between autophagy and cell death has come more as a shock to autophagy researchers, because most studies support a role for autophagy in sustaining cell survival. In this chapter we review some of the recent advances in the understanding of autophagy resulting from the better molecular characterization of this pathway and how the ability to genetically and pharmacologically modulate this lysosomal pathway has shed light on this apparent paradox.
2. AUTOPHAGY
Degradation of intracellular components is essential for maintenance of cellular homeostasis, continuous renewal of the proteome and organelles, removal of damaged cellular constituents, and the cellular response to environmental stressors. Two major proteolytic systems participate in intracellular protein clearance: (1) the ubiquitin/proteasome system, and (2) the lysosome. This degradation of intracellular proteins and organelles within lysosomes is called autophagy, a process conserved from yeast to mammalian cells.
63

HIROSHI KOGA AND ANA MARIA CUERVO
kinase, which is a negative regulator of macroautophagy. This complex regulates the initiation, nucleation, and expansion steps of autophagosome formation); (2) the nucleation complex, a second kinase complex containing Beclin 1 (the mammalian ortholog of the yeast protein Atg6), hsVPS34 (a class III PI3K), and a particular subset of interacting proteins, required for the nucleation phase; (3) two ubiquitinlike conjugation systems, the Atg12/5 system and the LC3 (mammalian ortholog of the yeast protein Atg8), phosphatidylserine systems that act sequentially during autophagosome formation; and (4) a recycling system, controlled by Atg4 and Atg9 and responsible for the shuttling of Atg proteins onto and off of the autophagosomal
membranes during the formation of autophagosomes. The maturation of autophagosomes requires several GTPases (Rab 7 and Rab 24) and other factors involved in fusion events and vesicular trafficking. Macroautophagy has been classically considered an inducible type of autophagy, which becomes maximally active in response to starvation or stressors resulting in extensive intracellular damage. However, recent studies support the

AUTOPHAGY – THE LIAISON BETWEEN THE LYSOSOMAL SYSTEM AND CELL DEATH |
65 |
||
|
|
into the lysosomal lumen assisted by |
|
|
|
a luminal chaperone. Some level of |
|
|
|
basal CMA activity is detectable in all |
|
|
|
cell types, but this type of autophagy |
|
|
|
is maximally activated under stress |
|
|
|
conditions. |
|
|
|
Most of the studies on the rela- |
|
|
|
tion of autophagy with cell death have |
|
|
|
focused on macroautophagy, which is |
|
|
|
also the main emphasis of this chap- |
|
|
|
ter. However, it is noteworthy to point |
|
|
|
out that blockage of CMA in cultured |
|
|
|
cells leads to activation of apoptosis on |
|
|
|
exposure to stressors that usually do not |
|
|
|
induce cell death if CMA is properly |
|
|
|
functioning. Although the mechanisms |
|
|
|
behind the activation of cell death |
|
|
|
under these conditions are unknown, |
|
|
|
it is interesting that well-known apop- |
|
Figure 7-3. Molecular regulators and e ectors of macroautophagy. The more than 30 genes |
totic effector proteins such as Apaf-1, |
||
Tp53, endonuclease G, caspase 3, Bim, |
|||
that have been shown to participate in macroautophagy (ATG genes) can be subdivided into |
|||
five main complexes: initiation complex, nucleation complex, conjugation cascades, recy- |
Bcl-2, and Bcl-XL all contain in their |
||
cling system, and the regulatory complex (see text for details). |
|
amino acid sequence CMA-targeting |
|
|
|
||
|
|
motifs that make them putative sub- |
|
existence in almost all cell types of basal macroau- |
strates for CMA. Further investigation is necessary |
||
tophagic activity essential for maintenance of cellular |
to determine whether or not selective degradation of |
||
homeostasis. |
apoptosis-related proteins via CMA could induce or pre- |
||
Microautophagy, a type of autophagy still poorly |
vent progression of apoptotic cell death under different |
||
characterized in mammals, has been proposed to |
conditions. |
|
|
be constitutively active and hence responsible for |
|
|
|
maintaining basal intracellular turnover. As in macro- |
|
|
|
autophagy, complete regions of cytosol are degraded in |
2.2. Physiologic functions of autophagy |
||
lysosomes, but in this case, the lysosomal membrane |
|||
|
|
||
itself invaginates or tubulates to trap the cargo (Fig- |
Autophagy is an essential mechanism for cell defense |
||
ure 7-2). Microautophagy is well characterized in yeast, |
in response to different types of stressors (Figure 7-4). |
||
where the exit from rapamycin-induced growth arrest |
Nutritional stress is the best characterized of these stres- |
||
(EGO) complex, in conjunction with TOR, positively |
sors, as it is well established that starvation induces |
||
regulates this pathway by inducing deformation of the |
activation of autophagy in many different organs in |
||
vacuole membrane (the equivalent to lysosomes in |
mammals and in unicellular organisms such as yeast. |
||
yeast). |
Activation of autophagy under these conditions is |
||
Chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) is a type of |
essential for cell survival. In fact, this dependence |
||
autophagy described so far only in mammals, which |
on autophagy for survival was used as a read out in |
||
is responsible for the selective degradation of a subset |
the genetic screenings used to identify genes essen- |
||
of cytosolic proteins in lysosomes. Substrate proteins |
tial for autophagy in yeast, because autophagy-defective |
||
all contain a pentapeptide motif (KFERQ-like motif) |
mutants are viable under normal growth conditions but |
||
that is selectively recognized by the cytosolic chaper- |
die rapidly during starvation. Shortly after the identifi- |
||
one hsc70, a constitutive member of the 70-kDa fam- |
cation of the first genes essential for autophagy in yeast |
||
ily of chaperones (Figure 7-2). The substrate/chaperone |
(ATG genes) and their mammalian homologs, this crit- |
||
complex is targeted to lysosomes where they inter- |
ical role of autophagy during starvation was also con- |
||
act with a lysosomal receptor for this pathway, the |
firmed in mammals. Thus mice deficient in essential |
||
lysosome-associated membrane protein type 2A (LAMP- |
autophagy genes die within 1 day after birth because |
||
2A). After unfolding, the substrate protein is translocated |
activation of autophagy is required to survive during the |

66 |
HIROSHI KOGA AND ANA MARIA CUERVO |
Figure 7-4. Physiologic functions of autophagy. Three of the many important functions of autophagy are to (1) become an alternative source of energy when nutrients are scarce by degrading proteins and lipid stores into amino acids (aa) and free fatty acids (FA); (2) contribute to quality control by eliminating any damaged protein and intracellular component; and (3) contribute to cellular defense against extracellular pathogens.
starvation that neonatal tissues face right after birth until nutrients can be restored through nursing.
Activation of autophagy during other types of stress responds, for the most part, to the need to eliminate intracellular components damaged by the different stressors (Figure 7-4). In other instances, activation of autophagy is used by cells as a mechanism of defense against pathogen invasion because autophagosomes have the capability to sequester and deliver the intruder to the lysosomal system for degradation.
Added to these well-characterized functions of autophagy as an inducible or stress-activated process, studies in the last few years have revealed a major role for autophagy in maintenance of cellular homeostasis under basal conditions. This basal autophagy has demonstrated to be an essential component of the cellular quality control mechanisms that prevent accumulation of cytotoxic proteins (aggregated and/or misfolded) and malfunctioning organelles (e.g., depolarized mitochondria, regions of the endoplasmic reticulum undergoing proteotoxic stress, nonfunctional peroxisomes). Autophagic removal of mitochondria is of particular relevance in the context of programmed cell death. Changes in the mitochondrial membrane potential and the resultant cytosolic release of mitochondrial components such as cytochrome c play a central role in the activation/maintenance of different cell death pathways. Consequently, a process such as macroautophagy that is able to sequester and eliminate the faulty
mitochondria could, at least in principle, prevent further engagement of downstream cell death effectors and hence avert cell death. In this respect, major effort is currently being dedicated to elucidate the mechanisms that mediate selective removal of altered mitochondria while preserving functional ones. Although still premature, recent studies support that active mitochondrial fusion and fission allow for the reorganization and sequestration of damaged mitochondrial components into daughter mitochondria that are segregated from the networking pool, recognized by the autophagosome integral components, and eliminated by autophagy.
2.3. Autophagy and human pathology
The improved methods to track autophagic activity in cellular and animal models, along with the capability now to modulate autophagy in vivo through genetic manipulations in ATG genes, has helped establish direct connections between autophagy malfunction and diverse pathologies, including neurodegenerative and metabolic diseases, infectious diseases, cancer, heart disease, and others.
Failure or inadequate autophagy has been proposed to underlie the pathogenesis of many late-onset neurodegenerative disorders caused by intracellular accumulation of pathogenic proteins that organize into toxic oligomers and higher order multimeric structures. As an essential component of the mechanisms for intracellular quality control, autophagy contributes to the continuous removal of these pathogenic proteins preventing cellular toxicity. In fact, upregulation of autophagy in several experimental models of proteotoxicity has proven effective in diminishing accumulation of protein aggregates and slowing down progression of disease. Defects in autophagy, often aggravated with age, have been extensively reported in the affected neurons in many of these disorders, suggesting that failure of this defensive mechanism is behind cellular loss and the subsequent onset of symptoms. Different components of the autophagic system seem to be direct targets of the pathogenic proteins. For example, mutations or post-translational modifications in α-synuclein, the protein that accumulates in the affected neurons in patients with Parkinson’s disease, have been shown to directly interact with the CMA receptor at the lysosomal membrane, resulting in general CMA inhibition. Impaired macroautophagy has been reported in Huntington’s and Alzheimer’s diseases, although the mechanisms behind the autophagic failure remain, for the most part, unknown. In light of these