Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Apoptosis_Physiology_and_Pathology.pdf
Скачиваний:
34
Добавлен:
12.02.2015
Размер:
10.82 Mб
Скачать

7Autophagy – The Liaison between the Lysosomal System and Cell Death

Hiroshi Koga and Ana Maria Cuervo

1. INTRODUCTION

The involvement of lysosomes, the organelle with the highest concentration of hydrolases, in cellular death has been extensively analyzed in different contexts in the past. In many of those studies, lysosomes were proposed to play a “passive” role in the cellular death process, resulting from the leakage of potent lysosomal enzymes into the cytosol. In fact, rupture of the lysosomal membrane after various types of cellular injury or under certain pathological conditions can lead to both apoptotic and nonapoptotic cell death. For example, lysomotropic agents, certain lipid products such as sphingosine or ceramide, a wide variety of death stimuli such as death receptor activation, p53 activation, microtubule-stabilizing agents, oxidative stress, and growth factor deprivation induce lysosomal permeabilization and the release of lysosomal proteases, generically known as cathepsins, into the cytosol. Studies using both genetic and pharmacological blockage of cathepsins support that cytosolic release of these lysosomal hydrolases can mediate caspase-dependent and -independent cell death.

The involvement of lysosomes in cellular death has recently been revisited, and a more active role for this organelle has been proposed. The main drive for this re-evaluation has been the recent advances in our understanding of one of the basic lysosomal functions: autophagy, or the self-digestion of intracellular components by lysosomes. In contrast to the “passive” role in cell death in which lysosomes are merely the carriers of the damaging enzymes that are released into the cytosol, in recent years a direct contribution of lysosomes as intact and properly functioning organelles to cell death has been proposed. The concept of autophagic cell death, however, is not new for cell death researchers.

In fact, this term has been extensively used in the classification of programmed cell death types based on morphological features (Figure 7-1). Thus, whereas in cell death type I or apoptotic cell death, the signature features are condensation of the nucleus and cytoplasm, DNA fragmentation, and early collapse of cytoskeletal elements, but preservation of organelles until late stages, the term cell death type II, or autophagic cell death, has been reserved for dying cells in which the presence of autophagosomes and autophagolysosomes – vesicular compartments related to autophagy – are the predominant morphological feature. In this case, early degradation of organelles but preservation of cytoskeletal elements until late stages are the signature features.

This connection between autophagy and cell death has come more as a shock to autophagy researchers, because most studies support a role for autophagy in sustaining cell survival. In this chapter we review some of the recent advances in the understanding of autophagy resulting from the better molecular characterization of this pathway and how the ability to genetically and pharmacologically modulate this lysosomal pathway has shed light on this apparent paradox.

2. AUTOPHAGY

Degradation of intracellular components is essential for maintenance of cellular homeostasis, continuous renewal of the proteome and organelles, removal of damaged cellular constituents, and the cellular response to environmental stressors. Two major proteolytic systems participate in intracellular protein clearance: (1) the ubiquitin/proteasome system, and (2) the lysosome. This degradation of intracellular proteins and organelles within lysosomes is called autophagy, a process conserved from yeast to mammalian cells.

63

Figure 7-2. Schematic model of the most common types of autophagy in mammals. Three types of autophagy are quantitatively the most important in mammalian cells. Macroautophagy involves the sequestration of cytosolic components into a double membrane vesicle that then fuses with lysosomes to attain complete degradation of the cargo. In microautophagy, the lysosomes engulf whole cytosolic regions into small vesicles that pinch o from the lysosomal membrane and are degraded along with their cargo in the lumen. Chaperone-mediated autophagy is responsible for the degradation of specific cytosolic proteins that, after being recognized by a cytosolic chaperone complex, are delivered to lysosomes and cross the lysosomal membrane in a receptor-dependent manner.
Different types of autophagy have been described on the basis of the mechanisms used for delivery of cargo to lysosomes, their regulation, and their intracellular functions. The three more common autophagic types in mammals are (1) macroautophagy, (2) microautophagy, and (3) chaperone-mediated autophagy (Figure 7-2).
Macroautophagy, quantitatively the most important type of autophagy, accounts for the degradation of both soluble proteins and organelles in lysosomes. Cargo is initially sequestered by an “isolation” membrane, originating from a pre-autophagosomal structure, or phagophore (Figure 7-2). This membrane elongates and fuses to form an autophagosome, a double membrane-bound vesicle that acquires the enzymes required for cargo degradation through fusion with secondary mature lysosomes in the cytosol. Approximately 30 novel gene products, known as Atg or autophagyrelated proteins, participate in various macroautophagy steps. These proteins can be divided into four functional groups (Figure 7-3): (1) the initiation complex – a serine-threonine kinase complex formed by Atg1, Atg13, and Atg17 – that integrates signaling from the target of rapamycin (TOR)
2.1. Molecular dissection of autophagy
64
Figure 7-1. Morphological characteristics of di erent types of cell death. Cell death type I and type II is a common classification used based on the morphological characteristics of dying cells. Some of the distinctive characteristics are enumerated. PCD, programmed cell death.

HIROSHI KOGA AND ANA MARIA CUERVO

kinase, which is a negative regulator of macroautophagy. This complex regulates the initiation, nucleation, and expansion steps of autophagosome formation); (2) the nucleation complex, a second kinase complex containing Beclin 1 (the mammalian ortholog of the yeast protein Atg6), hsVPS34 (a class III PI3K), and a particular subset of interacting proteins, required for the nucleation phase; (3) two ubiquitinlike conjugation systems, the Atg12/5 system and the LC3 (mammalian ortholog of the yeast protein Atg8), phosphatidylserine systems that act sequentially during autophagosome formation; and (4) a recycling system, controlled by Atg4 and Atg9 and responsible for the shuttling of Atg proteins onto and off of the autophagosomal

membranes during the formation of autophagosomes. The maturation of autophagosomes requires several GTPases (Rab 7 and Rab 24) and other factors involved in fusion events and vesicular trafficking. Macroautophagy has been classically considered an inducible type of autophagy, which becomes maximally active in response to starvation or stressors resulting in extensive intracellular damage. However, recent studies support the

AUTOPHAGY – THE LIAISON BETWEEN THE LYSOSOMAL SYSTEM AND CELL DEATH

65

 

 

into the lysosomal lumen assisted by

 

 

a luminal chaperone. Some level of

 

 

basal CMA activity is detectable in all

 

 

cell types, but this type of autophagy

 

 

is maximally activated under stress

 

 

conditions.

 

 

Most of the studies on the rela-

 

 

tion of autophagy with cell death have

 

 

focused on macroautophagy, which is

 

 

also the main emphasis of this chap-

 

 

ter. However, it is noteworthy to point

 

 

out that blockage of CMA in cultured

 

 

cells leads to activation of apoptosis on

 

 

exposure to stressors that usually do not

 

 

induce cell death if CMA is properly

 

 

functioning. Although the mechanisms

 

 

behind the activation of cell death

 

 

under these conditions are unknown,

 

 

it is interesting that well-known apop-

Figure 7-3. Molecular regulators and e ectors of macroautophagy. The more than 30 genes

totic effector proteins such as Apaf-1,

Tp53, endonuclease G, caspase 3, Bim,

that have been shown to participate in macroautophagy (ATG genes) can be subdivided into

five main complexes: initiation complex, nucleation complex, conjugation cascades, recy-

Bcl-2, and Bcl-XL all contain in their

cling system, and the regulatory complex (see text for details).

 

amino acid sequence CMA-targeting

 

 

 

 

motifs that make them putative sub-

existence in almost all cell types of basal macroau-

strates for CMA. Further investigation is necessary

tophagic activity essential for maintenance of cellular

to determine whether or not selective degradation of

homeostasis.

apoptosis-related proteins via CMA could induce or pre-

Microautophagy, a type of autophagy still poorly

vent progression of apoptotic cell death under different

characterized in mammals, has been proposed to

conditions.

 

be constitutively active and hence responsible for

 

 

maintaining basal intracellular turnover. As in macro-

 

 

autophagy, complete regions of cytosol are degraded in

2.2. Physiologic functions of autophagy

lysosomes, but in this case, the lysosomal membrane

 

 

itself invaginates or tubulates to trap the cargo (Fig-

Autophagy is an essential mechanism for cell defense

ure 7-2). Microautophagy is well characterized in yeast,

in response to different types of stressors (Figure 7-4).

where the exit from rapamycin-induced growth arrest

Nutritional stress is the best characterized of these stres-

(EGO) complex, in conjunction with TOR, positively

sors, as it is well established that starvation induces

regulates this pathway by inducing deformation of the

activation of autophagy in many different organs in

vacuole membrane (the equivalent to lysosomes in

mammals and in unicellular organisms such as yeast.

yeast).

Activation of autophagy under these conditions is

Chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) is a type of

essential for cell survival. In fact, this dependence

autophagy described so far only in mammals, which

on autophagy for survival was used as a read out in

is responsible for the selective degradation of a subset

the genetic screenings used to identify genes essen-

of cytosolic proteins in lysosomes. Substrate proteins

tial for autophagy in yeast, because autophagy-defective

all contain a pentapeptide motif (KFERQ-like motif)

mutants are viable under normal growth conditions but

that is selectively recognized by the cytosolic chaper-

die rapidly during starvation. Shortly after the identifi-

one hsc70, a constitutive member of the 70-kDa fam-

cation of the first genes essential for autophagy in yeast

ily of chaperones (Figure 7-2). The substrate/chaperone

(ATG genes) and their mammalian homologs, this crit-

complex is targeted to lysosomes where they inter-

ical role of autophagy during starvation was also con-

act with a lysosomal receptor for this pathway, the

firmed in mammals. Thus mice deficient in essential

lysosome-associated membrane protein type 2A (LAMP-

autophagy genes die within 1 day after birth because

2A). After unfolding, the substrate protein is translocated

activation of autophagy is required to survive during the

66

HIROSHI KOGA AND ANA MARIA CUERVO

Figure 7-4. Physiologic functions of autophagy. Three of the many important functions of autophagy are to (1) become an alternative source of energy when nutrients are scarce by degrading proteins and lipid stores into amino acids (aa) and free fatty acids (FA); (2) contribute to quality control by eliminating any damaged protein and intracellular component; and (3) contribute to cellular defense against extracellular pathogens.

starvation that neonatal tissues face right after birth until nutrients can be restored through nursing.

Activation of autophagy during other types of stress responds, for the most part, to the need to eliminate intracellular components damaged by the different stressors (Figure 7-4). In other instances, activation of autophagy is used by cells as a mechanism of defense against pathogen invasion because autophagosomes have the capability to sequester and deliver the intruder to the lysosomal system for degradation.

Added to these well-characterized functions of autophagy as an inducible or stress-activated process, studies in the last few years have revealed a major role for autophagy in maintenance of cellular homeostasis under basal conditions. This basal autophagy has demonstrated to be an essential component of the cellular quality control mechanisms that prevent accumulation of cytotoxic proteins (aggregated and/or misfolded) and malfunctioning organelles (e.g., depolarized mitochondria, regions of the endoplasmic reticulum undergoing proteotoxic stress, nonfunctional peroxisomes). Autophagic removal of mitochondria is of particular relevance in the context of programmed cell death. Changes in the mitochondrial membrane potential and the resultant cytosolic release of mitochondrial components such as cytochrome c play a central role in the activation/maintenance of different cell death pathways. Consequently, a process such as macroautophagy that is able to sequester and eliminate the faulty

mitochondria could, at least in principle, prevent further engagement of downstream cell death effectors and hence avert cell death. In this respect, major effort is currently being dedicated to elucidate the mechanisms that mediate selective removal of altered mitochondria while preserving functional ones. Although still premature, recent studies support that active mitochondrial fusion and fission allow for the reorganization and sequestration of damaged mitochondrial components into daughter mitochondria that are segregated from the networking pool, recognized by the autophagosome integral components, and eliminated by autophagy.

2.3. Autophagy and human pathology

The improved methods to track autophagic activity in cellular and animal models, along with the capability now to modulate autophagy in vivo through genetic manipulations in ATG genes, has helped establish direct connections between autophagy malfunction and diverse pathologies, including neurodegenerative and metabolic diseases, infectious diseases, cancer, heart disease, and others.

Failure or inadequate autophagy has been proposed to underlie the pathogenesis of many late-onset neurodegenerative disorders caused by intracellular accumulation of pathogenic proteins that organize into toxic oligomers and higher order multimeric structures. As an essential component of the mechanisms for intracellular quality control, autophagy contributes to the continuous removal of these pathogenic proteins preventing cellular toxicity. In fact, upregulation of autophagy in several experimental models of proteotoxicity has proven effective in diminishing accumulation of protein aggregates and slowing down progression of disease. Defects in autophagy, often aggravated with age, have been extensively reported in the affected neurons in many of these disorders, suggesting that failure of this defensive mechanism is behind cellular loss and the subsequent onset of symptoms. Different components of the autophagic system seem to be direct targets of the pathogenic proteins. For example, mutations or post-translational modifications in α-synuclein, the protein that accumulates in the affected neurons in patients with Parkinson’s disease, have been shown to directly interact with the CMA receptor at the lysosomal membrane, resulting in general CMA inhibition. Impaired macroautophagy has been reported in Huntington’s and Alzheimer’s diseases, although the mechanisms behind the autophagic failure remain, for the most part, unknown. In light of these

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]