- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Preface
- •1 Introduction, with the biological basis for cell mechanics
- •Introduction
- •The role of cell mechanics in biological function
- •Maintenance of cell shape
- •Cell migration
- •Mechanosensing
- •Stress responses and the role of mechanical forces in disease
- •Active cell contraction
- •Structural anatomy of a cell
- •The extracellular matrix and its attachment to cells
- •Transmission of force to the cytoskeleton and the role of the lipid bilayer
- •Intracellular structures
- •Overview
- •References
- •2 Experimental measurements of intracellular mechanics
- •Introduction
- •Forces to which cells are exposed in a biological context
- •Methods to measure intracellular rheology by macrorheology, diffusion, and sedimentation
- •Whole cell aggregates
- •Sedimentation of particles
- •Diffusion
- •Mechanical indentation of the cell surface
- •Glass microneedles
- •Cell poker
- •Atomic force microscopy
- •Mechanical tension applied to the cell membrane
- •Shearing and compression between microplates
- •Optical traps
- •Magnetic methods
- •Twisting of magnetized particles on the cell surface and interior
- •Passive microrheology
- •Optically detected individual probes
- •One-particle method
- •Two-particle methods
- •Dynamic light scattering and diffusing wave spectroscopy
- •Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy
- •Optical stretcher
- •Acoustic microscopy
- •Outstanding issues and future directions
- •References
- •3 The cytoskeleton as a soft glassy material
- •Introduction
- •Magnetic Twisting Cytometry (MTC)
- •Measurements of cell mechanics
- •The structural damping equation
- •Reduction of variables
- •Universality
- •Scaling the data
- •Collapse onto master curves
- •Theory of soft glassy rheology
- •What are soft glassy materials
- •Sollich’s theory of SGMs
- •Soft glassy rheology and structural damping
- •Open questions
- •Biological insights from SGR theory
- •Malleability of airway smooth muscle
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •4 Continuum elastic or viscoelastic models for the cell
- •Introduction
- •Purpose of continuum models
- •Principles of continuum models
- •Boundary conditions
- •Mechanical and material characteristics
- •Example of studied cell types
- •Blood cells: leukocytes and erythrocytes
- •Limitations of continuum model
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •5 Multiphasic models of cell mechanics
- •Introduction
- •Biphasic poroviscoelastic models of cell mechanics
- •Analysis of cell mechanical tests
- •Micropipette aspiration
- •Cells
- •Biphasic properties of the pericellular matrix
- •Indentation studies of cell multiphasic properties
- •Analysis of cell–matrix interactions using multiphasic models
- •Summary
- •References
- •6 Models of cytoskeletal mechanics based on tensegrity
- •Introduction
- •The cellular tensegrity model
- •The cellular tensegrity model
- •Do living cells behave as predicted by the tensegrity model?
- •Circumstantial evidence
- •Prestress-induced stiffening
- •Action at a distance
- •Do microtubules carry compression?
- •Summary
- •Examples of mathematical models of the cytoskeleton based on tensegrity
- •The cortical membrane model
- •Tensed cable nets
- •Cable-and-strut model
- •Summary
- •Tensegrity and cellular dynamics
- •Conclusion
- •Acknowledgement
- •References
- •7 Cells, gels, and mechanics
- •Introduction
- •Problems with the aqueous-solution-based paradigm
- •Cells as gels
- •Cell dynamics
- •Gels and motion
- •Secretion
- •Muscle contraction
- •Conclusion
- •Acknowledgement
- •References
- •8 Polymer-based models of cytoskeletal networks
- •Introduction
- •The worm-like chain model
- •Force-extension of single chains
- •Dynamics of single chains
- •Network elasticity
- •Nonlinear response
- •Discussion
- •References
- •9 Cell dynamics and the actin cytoskeleton
- •Introduction: The role of actin in the cell
- •Interaction of the cell cytoskeleton with the outside environment
- •The role of cytoskeletal structure
- •Actin mechanics
- •Actin dynamics
- •The emergence of actin dynamics
- •The intrinsic dynamics of actin
- •Regulation of dynamics by actin-binding proteins
- •Capping protein: ‘decommissioning’ the old
- •Gelsolin: rapid remodeling in one or two steps
- •β4-thymosin: accounting (sometimes) for the other half
- •Dynamic actin in crawling cells
- •Actin in the leading edge
- •Monomer recycling: the other ‘actin dynamics’
- •The biophysics of actin-based pushing
- •Conclusion
- •Acknowledgements
- •References
- •10 Active cellular protrusion: continuum theories and models
- •Cellular protrusion: the standard cartoon
- •The RIF formalism
- •Mass conservation
- •Momentum conservation
- •Boundary conditions
- •Cytoskeletal theories of cellular protrusion
- •Network–membrane interactions
- •Network dynamics near the membrane
- •Special cases of network–membrane interaction: polymerization force, brownian and motor ratchets
- •Network–network interactions
- •Network dynamics with swelling
- •Other theories of protrusion
- •Numerical implementation of the RIF formalism
- •An example of cellular protrusion
- •Protrusion driven by membrane–cytoskeleton repulsion
- •Protrusion driven by cytoskeletal swelling
- •Discussion
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •11 Summary
- •References
- •Index
Summary |
229 |
migration consists of several steps involving multiple mechanobiological signals and events starting with the leading edge protrusion, formation of new adhesion plaques at the front edge, followed by contraction of the cell and the release of adhesions at the rear (see Li et al., 2005 for a recent review). A host of mechanical and biochemical factors, namely extracellular matrix cues, chemoattractant concentration gradients, substrate rigidity, and other mechanical signals, influence these processes. Many unanswered questions remain in understanding the signaling molecules that play a key role in cell migration, and how they are regulated both in time and 3D space. It is largely unknown how a cell actively controls the traction force at a focal adhesion or how this force varies with time during the cell migration.
To understand the mechanobiology of the cell requires a multiscale/multiphysics view of how externally applied stresses or traction forces are transmitted through focal adhesion receptors and distributed throughout the cell, leading subsequently to conformational changes that occur in individual mechanosensing proteins that in turn lead to increased enzymatic activity or altered binding affinities. This presents both a challenge and an opportunity for further research into the intrinsically coupled mechanobiological phenomena that eventually determine the macroscopic behavior and function of the cell.
Because no one method has emerged as clearly superior in describing the mechanics and biology of the cell across all cell types and physical conditions, this might reflect the need for new approaches and ideas. We hope that this monograph has inspired new researchers with fresh ideas directed toward that goal. Perhaps the biggest question that still remains is whether it is at all possible to construct a single model that is universally applicable and can be used to describe all types of cell mechanical behavior.
References
Bursac P, Lenormand G, Fabry B, Oliver M, Weitz DA, Viasnoff V, Butler JP, Fredberg JJ. “Cytoskeletal remodelling and slow dynamics in the living cell.” Nat. Mater., 4(7):557–61, 2005.
Gardel ML, Shin JH, MacKintosh FC, Mahadevan L, Matsudaira PA, Weitz DA. “Scaling of F-actin network rheology to probe single filament elasticity and dynamics.” Phys. Rev. Lett., 93(18):188102, 2004.
Geiger B, Bershadsky A, Pankov R, Yamada KM. “Transmembrane crosstalk between the extracellular matrix–cytoskeleton crosstalk.” Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2(11): 793–805, 2001.
Haidekker MA, L’Heureux N, Frangos JA. “Fluid shear stress increases membrane fluidity in endothelial cells: a study with DCVJ fluorescence.” Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol., 278(4):H1401–6, 2000.
Hamill OP, Martinac C. “Molecular basis of mechanotransduction in living cells.” Physiol. Rev., 81: 685–740, 2001.
Kamm RD and Kaazempur-Mofrad MR. “On the molecular basis for mechanotransduction,” Mech. Chem. Biosystems, Vol. 1(3):201–210, 2004.
Li S, Guan JL, Chien S. “Biochemistry and biomechanics of cell motility.” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 7:105–50, 2005.
Maniotis AJ, Chen CS, Ingber DE. “Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94:849–54, 1997.
Marquez JP, Genin GM, Zahalak GI, Elson EL. “The relationship between cell and tissue strain in three-dimensional bio-artificial tissues.” Biophys. J., 88(2):778–89, 2005.
230M.R.K. Mofrad and R.D. Kamm
Odde DJ, Ma L, Briggs AH, DeMarco A, Kirschner MW. “Microtubule bending and breaking in living fibroblast cells.” J. Cell Sci., 112:3283–8, 1999.
Tseng Y, Lee J S, Kole, T P, Jiang, I, and Wirtz, D. “Micro-organization and visco-elasticity of the interphase nucleus revealed by particle nanotracking.” J. Cell Sci., 117, 2159–67, 2004.
Tschumperlin DJ, Dai G, Maly IV, Kikuchi T, Laiho LH, McVittie AK, Haley KJ, Lilly CM, So PT, Lauffenburger DA, Kamm RD, Drazen JM. “Mechanotransduction through growth-factor shedding into the extracellular space.” Nature, 429: 83–6, 2004.