- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Preface
- •1 Introduction, with the biological basis for cell mechanics
- •Introduction
- •The role of cell mechanics in biological function
- •Maintenance of cell shape
- •Cell migration
- •Mechanosensing
- •Stress responses and the role of mechanical forces in disease
- •Active cell contraction
- •Structural anatomy of a cell
- •The extracellular matrix and its attachment to cells
- •Transmission of force to the cytoskeleton and the role of the lipid bilayer
- •Intracellular structures
- •Overview
- •References
- •2 Experimental measurements of intracellular mechanics
- •Introduction
- •Forces to which cells are exposed in a biological context
- •Methods to measure intracellular rheology by macrorheology, diffusion, and sedimentation
- •Whole cell aggregates
- •Sedimentation of particles
- •Diffusion
- •Mechanical indentation of the cell surface
- •Glass microneedles
- •Cell poker
- •Atomic force microscopy
- •Mechanical tension applied to the cell membrane
- •Shearing and compression between microplates
- •Optical traps
- •Magnetic methods
- •Twisting of magnetized particles on the cell surface and interior
- •Passive microrheology
- •Optically detected individual probes
- •One-particle method
- •Two-particle methods
- •Dynamic light scattering and diffusing wave spectroscopy
- •Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy
- •Optical stretcher
- •Acoustic microscopy
- •Outstanding issues and future directions
- •References
- •3 The cytoskeleton as a soft glassy material
- •Introduction
- •Magnetic Twisting Cytometry (MTC)
- •Measurements of cell mechanics
- •The structural damping equation
- •Reduction of variables
- •Universality
- •Scaling the data
- •Collapse onto master curves
- •Theory of soft glassy rheology
- •What are soft glassy materials
- •Sollich’s theory of SGMs
- •Soft glassy rheology and structural damping
- •Open questions
- •Biological insights from SGR theory
- •Malleability of airway smooth muscle
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •4 Continuum elastic or viscoelastic models for the cell
- •Introduction
- •Purpose of continuum models
- •Principles of continuum models
- •Boundary conditions
- •Mechanical and material characteristics
- •Example of studied cell types
- •Blood cells: leukocytes and erythrocytes
- •Limitations of continuum model
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •5 Multiphasic models of cell mechanics
- •Introduction
- •Biphasic poroviscoelastic models of cell mechanics
- •Analysis of cell mechanical tests
- •Micropipette aspiration
- •Cells
- •Biphasic properties of the pericellular matrix
- •Indentation studies of cell multiphasic properties
- •Analysis of cell–matrix interactions using multiphasic models
- •Summary
- •References
- •6 Models of cytoskeletal mechanics based on tensegrity
- •Introduction
- •The cellular tensegrity model
- •The cellular tensegrity model
- •Do living cells behave as predicted by the tensegrity model?
- •Circumstantial evidence
- •Prestress-induced stiffening
- •Action at a distance
- •Do microtubules carry compression?
- •Summary
- •Examples of mathematical models of the cytoskeleton based on tensegrity
- •The cortical membrane model
- •Tensed cable nets
- •Cable-and-strut model
- •Summary
- •Tensegrity and cellular dynamics
- •Conclusion
- •Acknowledgement
- •References
- •7 Cells, gels, and mechanics
- •Introduction
- •Problems with the aqueous-solution-based paradigm
- •Cells as gels
- •Cell dynamics
- •Gels and motion
- •Secretion
- •Muscle contraction
- •Conclusion
- •Acknowledgement
- •References
- •8 Polymer-based models of cytoskeletal networks
- •Introduction
- •The worm-like chain model
- •Force-extension of single chains
- •Dynamics of single chains
- •Network elasticity
- •Nonlinear response
- •Discussion
- •References
- •9 Cell dynamics and the actin cytoskeleton
- •Introduction: The role of actin in the cell
- •Interaction of the cell cytoskeleton with the outside environment
- •The role of cytoskeletal structure
- •Actin mechanics
- •Actin dynamics
- •The emergence of actin dynamics
- •The intrinsic dynamics of actin
- •Regulation of dynamics by actin-binding proteins
- •Capping protein: ‘decommissioning’ the old
- •Gelsolin: rapid remodeling in one or two steps
- •β4-thymosin: accounting (sometimes) for the other half
- •Dynamic actin in crawling cells
- •Actin in the leading edge
- •Monomer recycling: the other ‘actin dynamics’
- •The biophysics of actin-based pushing
- •Conclusion
- •Acknowledgements
- •References
- •10 Active cellular protrusion: continuum theories and models
- •Cellular protrusion: the standard cartoon
- •The RIF formalism
- •Mass conservation
- •Momentum conservation
- •Boundary conditions
- •Cytoskeletal theories of cellular protrusion
- •Network–membrane interactions
- •Network dynamics near the membrane
- •Special cases of network–membrane interaction: polymerization force, brownian and motor ratchets
- •Network–network interactions
- •Network dynamics with swelling
- •Other theories of protrusion
- •Numerical implementation of the RIF formalism
- •An example of cellular protrusion
- •Protrusion driven by membrane–cytoskeleton repulsion
- •Protrusion driven by cytoskeletal swelling
- •Discussion
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •11 Summary
- •References
- •Index
68 J. Fredberg and B. Fabry
η E L L
δF
}quench (a)
LSE
}quench (b)
1.2
1.1 |
x |
(c) |
1.0
cold
Fig. 3-10. Evolution of mechanical properties of bovine tracheal smooth muscle during contraction against a constant mean force on which force fluctuations (0.2 Hz) of graded amplitude δ F were superimposed. (a) Mean muscle length L (relative to optimal length L0). (b) Loop stiffness (percentage of maximum isometric value). (c) hysteresivity η and noise temperature x. LSE is the statically equilibrated length of the muscle after 120 min. of unperturbed contraction against a constant load of 32% of maximum force (F0). Adapted from Fredberg, 2000.
tidal stretches are terminated (Figs. 3-9 and 3-10), however, the noise temperature is suddenly lowered, and all plastic changes might become trapped, or quenched, so that the muscle is unable to return to maximum force and stiffness (Fig. 3.10), or maximum shortening (Fig. 3-10) (Fabry and Fredberg, 2003).
The glass hypothesis predicts, therefore, that the cell ought to be able to adapt faster to step-length changes imposed while the cell is transiently ‘hot’ (that is, early in activation), and far less so after it has cooled in the process of sustained activation (Fabry and Fredberg, 2003; Gunst and Fredberg, 2003). Indeed, Gunst and colleagues showed that a step change of muscle length alters the level of the subsequent force plateau to a degree that depends mostly on the timing of the length change with respect to stimulus onset (Gunst, Meiss et al., 1995; Gunst and Fredberg, 2003).
Conclusion
The behavior of soft glasses, and the underlying notion of the noise temperature, might provide a unifying explanation of the ability of the cytoskeletal lattice to deform, to flow, and to remodel. Such a view does not point to specific molecular processes that occur, but instead derives the mechanical properties from generic features: structural elements that are discrete, numerous, aggregated with one another via weak interactions, and arrayed in a geometry that is structurally disordered and metastable. We have proposed here that these features may comprise the basis of CSK rheology and remodeling.
References
Alcaraz, J., L. Buscemi, et al. (2003). Microrheology of human lung epithelial cells measured by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J., 84, 2071–9.
The cytoskeleton as a soft glassy material |
69 |
An, S. S., B. Fabry, et al. (2004). Role of heat shock protein 27 in cytoskeletal remodeling of the airway smooth muscle cell. J. Appl. Physiol., 96, 1701–13.
Bouchaud, J. (1992). Weak ergodicity breaking and aging in disordered systems. J. Phys. I., 2, 1705– 13.
Butler, J. P., I. M. Tolic-Norrelykke, et al. (2002). Traction fields, moments, and strain energy that cells exert on their surroundings. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol., 282, C595–605.
Crandall, S. H. (1970). The role of damping in vibration theory. J. Sound Vibr., 11, 3–18.
Crick, F. H. C. and A. F. W. Hughes (1950). The physical properties of cytoplasm. Exp. Cell Res., 1, 37–80.
Fabry, B. and J. J. Fredberg (2003). Remodeling of the airway smooth muscle cell: are we built of glass? Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol., 137, 109–24.
Fabry, B., G. N. Maksym, et al. (2001). Scaling the microrheology of living cells. Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 148102.
Fabry, B., G. N. Maksym, et al. (2003). Time scale and other invariants of integrative mechanical behavior in living cells. Phys. Rev. E., 68, 041914.
Fabry, B., G. N. Maksym, et al. (2001). Time course and heterogeneity of contractile responses in cultured human airway smooth muscle cells. J. Appl. Physiol., 91, 986–94.
Fredberg, J. J. (2000). Airway smooth muscle in asthma. Perturbed equilibria of myosin binding. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 161, S158–60.
Fredberg, J. J., D. Bunk, et al. (1993). Tissue resistance and the contractile state of lung parenchyma.
J. Appl. Physiol., 74, 1387–97.
Fredberg, J. J., D. Inouye, et al. (1997). Airway smooth muscle, tidal stretches, and dynamically determined contractile states. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 156, 1752–9.
Fredberg, J. J., K. A. Jones, et al. (1996). Friction in airway smooth muscle: mechanism, latch, and implications in asthma. J. Appl. Physiol., 81, 2703–12.
Fredberg, J. J. and D. Stamenovic (1989). On the imperfect elasticity of lung tissue. J. Appl. Physiol., 67, 2408–19.
Fung, Y. C. (1967). Elasticity of soft tissues in simple elongation. Am. J. Physiol., 213, 1532–44. Goldmann, W. H. and R. M. Ezzell (1996). Viscoelasticity in wild-type and vinculin-deficient (5.51)
mouse F9 embryonic carcinoma cells examined by atomic force microscopy and rheology. Exp. Cell Res., 226, 234–7.
Gunst, S. J. and J. J. Fredberg (2003). The first three minutes: smooth muscle contraction, cytoskeletal events, and soft glasses. J. Appl. Physiol., 95, 413–25.
Gunst, S. J., R. A. Meiss, et al. (1995). Mechanisms for the mechanical plasticity of tracheal smooth muscle. Am. J. Physiol., 268, C1267–76.
Hai, C. M. and R. A. Murphy (1989). Cross-bridge dephosphorylation and relaxation of vascular smooth muscle. Am. J. Physiol., 256, C282–7.
Hantos, Z., B. Daroczy, et al. (1990). Modeling of low-frequency pulmonary impedance in dogs.
J. Appl. Physiol., 68, 849–60.
Hildebrandt, J. (1969). Comparison of mathematical models for cat lung and viscoelastic balloon derived by Laplace transform methods from pressure-volume data. Bull. Math. Biophys., 31, 651–67.
Hill, A. V. (1965). Trails and Trials in Physiology (pp. 14–15). London, E. Arnold.
Hubmayr, R. D., S. A. Shore, et al. (1996). Pharmacological activation changes stiffness of cultured human airway smooth muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol., 271, C1660–8.
Kawai, M. and P. W. Brandt (1980). Sinusoidal analysis: a high resolution method for correlating biochemical reactions with physiological processes in activated skeletal muscles of rabbit, frog and crayfish. . J Muscle Res. Cell Motil., 1, 279–303.
Kimball, A. L. and D. E. Lovell (1927). Internal friction in solids. Phys. Rev., 30, 948–959. Kohlrausch, F. (1866). Beitr¨age zur Kenntniss der elastischen Nachwirkung. Ann. Phys. Chem.,
128, 1–20, 207–227, 399–419.
Kohlrausch, R. (1847). Nachtrag ueber die elastische Nachwirkung beim Coconund Glasfaden, und die hygroskopische Eigenschaft des ersteren. Ann. Phys. Chem., 72, 393–8.
Lau, A. W., B. D. Hoffman, et al. (2003). Microrheology, stress fluctuations, and active behavior of living cells. Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 198101.
70J. Fredberg and B. Fabry
Laudadio, R. E., E. J. Millet, et al. (2005). Rheology of the rat airway smooth muscle cell: scaling of responses to actin modulation. Am. J. Physiol., in review.
Lenormand, G., E. Millet, et al. (2004). Linearity and time-scale invariance of the creep function in living cells. J. Royal Soc. Interface, 1, 91–7.
Mahaffy, R. E., C. K. Shih, et al. (2000). Scanning probe-based frequency-dependent microrheology of polymer gels and biological cells. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 880–3.
Maksym, G. N., B. Fabry, et al. (2000). Mechanical properties of cultured human airway smooth muscle cells from 0.05 to 0.4 Hz. J. Appl. Physiol., 89, 1619–32.
Mijailovich, S. M., J. P. Butler, et al. (2000). Perturbed equilibria of myosin binding in airway smooth muscle: bond-length distributions, mechanics, and ATP metabolism. Biophys. J., 79, 2667–81.
Mijailovich, S. M., M. Kojic, et al. (2002). A finite element model of cell deformation during magnetic bead twisting. J. Appl. Physiol., 93, 1429–36.
Murphy, R. A. (1988). Muscle cells of hollow organs. News Physiol. Sci., 3, 124–8.
Navajas, D., S. Mijailovich, et al. (1992). Dynamic response of the isolated passive rat diaphragm strip. J. Appl. Physiol., 73, 2681–92.
Puig-de-Morales, M., E. Millet, et al. (2004). Cytoskeletal mechanics in adherent human airway smooth muscle cells: probe specificity and scaling of protein-protein dynamics. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol., 287, C643–54.
Satcher, R. L., Jr. and C. F. Dewey, Jr. (1996). Theoretical estimates of mechanical properties of the endothelial cell cytoskeleton. Biophys. J., 71, 109–18.
Shroff, S. G., D. R. Saner, et al. (1995). Dynamic micromechanical properties of cultured rat atrial myocytes measured by atomic force microscopy. Am. J. Physiol., 269, C286–92.
Sollich, P. (1998). Rheological constitutive equation for a model of soft glassy materials. Phys. Rev. E., 58, 738–59.
Sollich, P., F. Lequeux, et al. (1997). Rheology of soft glassy materials. Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 2020–2023.
Suki, B., R. Peslin, et al. (1989). Lung impedance in healthy humans measured by forced oscillations from 0.01 to 0.1 Hz. J. Appl. Physiol., 67, 1623–9.
Wang, L., P. D. Pare, et al. (2001). Effect of chronic passive length change on airway smooth muscle length-tension relationship. J. Appl. Physiol., 90, 734–40.
Wang, N., I. M. Tolic-Norrelykke, et al. (2002). Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol., 282, C606–16.
Warshaw, D. M., D. D. Rees, et al. (1988). Characterization of cross-bridge elasticity and kinetics of cross-bridge cycling during force development in single smooth muscle cells. J. Gen. Physiol., 91, 761–79.
Weber, W. (1835). Ueber die Elasticitaet der Seidenfaeden. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 34, 247–57.
Weber, W. (1841). Ueber die Elasticitaet fester Koerper. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 54, 1–18. Yamada, S., D. Wirtz, et al. (2000). Mechanics of living cells measured by laser tracking
microrheology. Biophys. J., 78, 1736–47.