Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5217_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
26 Мб
Скачать
Chapter 8 Metabolic and hormonal responses of medicinal and aromatic plants 323
[70] Kaya, C. (2022). Işık Stresinin Bitkiler Üzerindeki Etkisi. Bitkilerde Abiyotik Ve Biyotik Stres Yönetimi,
Chapter 7, Iksad Publications, Ankara, ISBN: 978–625-6380-66–0.
[71] Cortleven, A., Nitschke, S., Klaumunzer, M., AbdElgawad, H., Asard, H., Grimm, B., Riefler, M. and
Schmulling, T. (2014). A novel protective function for cytokinin in the light stress response is mediated by the Arabidopsis Histidine Kinase2 and Arabidopsis Histidine Kinase3 receptors. Plant Physiology, 164, 1470–1483.
[72] Krieger-Liszkay, A. (2005). Singlet oksijen production in photosynthesis. Journal of Experimental
Botany, 56, 33346.
[73] Doğru, A. (2020). Bitkilerde Aktif Oksijen Türleri ve Oksidatif Stres. International Journal of Life
Sciences and Biotechnology, 3(2), 205–226.
[74] Yang, B., Tang, J., Yu, Z., Khare, T., Srivastav, A., Datir, S. and Kumar, V. (2019). Light stress responses
and prospects for engineering light stress. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 38, 1489–1506.
[75] Mudgal, V., Madaan, N., Mudgal, A., Singh, A. and Kumar, P. (2010). Comparative study of the
effects of salinity on plant growth, nodulation, and legheamoglobin content in kabuli and desi cultivars of Cicer arietinum (L.). Atlas Journal of Biology, 1(1), 1–4.
[76] Corwin, D. L. (2021). Climate change impacts on soil salinity in agricultural areas. European Journal
of Soil Science, 72(2), 842–862.
[77] Sheldon, A. R., Dalal, R. C., Kirchhof, G., Kopittke, P. M. and Menzies, N. W. (2017). The effect of
salinity on plant-available water. Plant and Soil, 418(1), 477–491.
[78] Mishra, P., Mishra, J. and Arora, N. K. (2021). Plant growth promoting bacteria for combating salinity
stress in plants–recent developments and prospects: A review. Microbiological Research, 252,
126861.
[79] Koç, F. N., Çetinkaya, H. and Seçkin Dinler, B. (2022). Bitkilerde Tuz Stresinin Etkileri, Savunma
Cevapları Ve Inyal Iletim Yolu. Chapter 4, Bitkilerde Abiyotik Ve Biyotik Stress Yönetimi, İKSAD Publishing House, Ankara.
[80] Zhao, C., Zhang, H., Song, C., Zhu, J. K. and Shabala, S. (2020). Mechanisms of plant responses and
adaptation to soil salinity. The Innovation, 1(1), 100017.
[81] Ahmad, R., Hussain, S., Anjum, M. A., Khalid, M. F., Saqib, M., Zakir, I. . . . and Ahmad, S. (2019).
Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense mechanisms in plants under salt stress. In: Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance: Agronomic, Molecular and Biotechnological Approaches, 191–205.
[82] Zhu, J. K. (2002). Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annual Reviews of Plant
Biology, 53, 247–273.
[83] Xiong, L., Schumaker, K. S. and Zhu, J. K. (2002). Cell signaling during cold, drought, and salt stress.
The Plant Cell, 14(suppl_1), S165–S183.
[84] Cao, Y. R., Chen, S. Y. and Zhang, J. S. (2008). Ethylene signaling regulates salt stress response: An
overview. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 3, 761–763.
[85] Abid, M., Zhang, Y. J., Li, Z., Bai, D. F., Zhong, Y. P. and Fang, J. B. (2020). Effect of salt stress on
growth, physiological and biochemical characters of four kiwifruit genotypes. Scientia Horticulturae, 271, 109473.
[86] Hao, S., Wang, Y., Yan, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, J. and Chen, S. (2021). A review on plant responses to salt
stress and their mechanisms of salt resistance. Horticulturae, 7(6), 132.
[87] White, R. E. (2006). Principles and Practice of Soil Science: The Soil as a Natural Resource, 4th
Edition, Wiley-Blackwell Scientific Publication, London, United Kingdom. [88] Fageria, N. K. (2009). The Use of Nutrients in Crop Plants, CRC Pres, Boca Raton, Florida, New York. [89] Kacar, B. and Katkat, V. (2010). Bitki Besleme. 5. Baskı, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım Tic, Ltd. Şti, Kızılay-
Ankara. [90] Bolat, İ. and Kara, Ö. (2017). Bitki Besin Elementleri: Kaynakları, İşlevleri, Eksik ve Fazlalıkları. Journal
of Bartin Faculty of Forestry, 19(1), 218–228.
324 Esra Uçar et al.
[91] Kantarcı, M. D. (2000). Toprak Ilmi. Iü Toprak Ilmi Ve Ekoloji Anabilim Dalı, I Ü Yayın No. 4261,
Orman Fakültesi Yayın No. 462, İstanbul, 420s, Istanbul University Faculty of Forestry Publications.
[92] Boşgelmez, A., Boşgelmez, İ. İ., Savaşçı, S. and Paslı, N. (2001). Ekoloji – II (Toprak). Başkent Klişe
Matbaacılık, Kızılay-Ankara.
[93] Küçükyumuk, Z. and Bayındır, Ü. (2023). Bitki Beslenmesi ve Bitki Hastalıkları İlişkisi. Turkish Journal
of Science and Engineering, 5(1), 42–49.
[94] Aktaş, M. and Ateş, A. (1998). Bitkilerde Beslenme Bozuklukları Nedenleri Tanınmaları. Nurol
Matbaacılık A.Ş, Ostim-Ankara.
[95] McCauley, A., Jones, C. and Jacobsen, J. (2009). Nutrient Management. Nutrient management
module 9 Montana State University Extension Service. Publication, 4449–9, 1–16.
[96] Yang, L., Ji, J., Harris-Shultz, K. R., Wang, H., Wang, H., Abd-Allah, E. F., Luo, Y. and Hu, X. (2016). The
dynamic changes of the plasma membrane proteins and the protective roles of nitric oxide in rice subjected to heavy metal cadmium stress. Frontiers in Plant Sciences, 7, 190.
[97] Bayçu, G., Özden, H., Gören-Sağlam, N. and Rognes, S. (2008). Effect of Cd, Pb, chilling and drought
treatments on activity of five antioxidant enzymes and free proline level in Albizzia leaves, FESPB congress, 17–24 August, Tampere- Finland. Physiologia Plantarum, 133.
[98] Dalcorso, G., Fasani, E. and Furini, A. (2013). Recent advances in the analysis of metal
hyperaccumulation and hypertolerance in plants using proteomics. Frontıers in Plant Scıence, 4, 280.
[99] Liu, H., Wang, C., Xie, Y., Luo, Y., Sheng, M. and Xu, F. (2020). Ecological responses of soil microbial
abundance and diversity to cadmium and soil properties in farmland around an enterprise­intensive region. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 392, 122478.
[100] Lin, A. J., Zhang, X. H., Chen, M. M. and Cao, Q. (2007). Oxidative stress and DNA damages induced
by cadmium accumulation. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 19, 596–602.
[101] Turfan, N. (2022). Bitkilerde Ağir Metal Stresi. Bitkilerde Abiyotik Ve Biyotik Stres Yönetimi,
Chapter 6, ISBN: 978–625-6380-66–0, İKSAD Publishing House, 164–192.
[102] Haktanır, K. and Arcak, S. (1998). Çevre Kirliliği. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi, Ders Kitabı,
Ankara. Yayın No: 1503, 457s.
[103] Sieprawska, A., Kornaś, A. and Filek, M. (2015). Involvement of selenium in protective mechanisms
of plants under environmental stress conditions–review. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica, 57, 1–12.
[104] Turhan, Ş., Turfan, N. and Kurnaz, A. (2022). Heavy metal contamination and health risk evaluation
of chestnut (Castaneasativa Miller) consumed in Turkey. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 33(11), 1091–1101.
[105] Sultana, M. S., Rana, S., Yamazaki, S., Aono, T. and Yoshida, S. (2017). Health risk assessment for
carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic heavy metal exposures from vegetables and fruits of Bangladesh. Cogent Environmental Science, 3(1291107), 1–17.
[106] Singh, S., Parihar, P., Singh, R., Singh, V. P. and Prasad, S. M. (2016). Heavy metal tolerance in
plants: Role of Transcriptomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics, and Ionomics. Frontiers in Plant Sciences, 6, 1143.
[107] Kumar, V., Singh, J. and Kumar, P. (2019). Heavy metals accumulation in crop plants: Sources,
response mechanisms, stress tolerance and their effects. In: Kumar, V., Kumar, R., Singh, J. & Kumar, P. ((eds)) Contaminants in Agriculture and Environment: Health Risks and Remediation, Vol. 1, Agro Environ Media, Haridwar, India, 38–57.
[108] Kumar, S. S., Kadier, A., Malyan, S. K., Ahmad, A. and Bishnoi, N. R. (2017). Phytoremediation and
rhizoremediation: Uptake, mobilization and sequestration of heavy metals by plants. In: Singh, D.P. and Singh, H.B (eds) Plant-Microbe Interactions in Agro-Ecological Perspectives, Springer, Singapore, 367–394.
[109] Schrödinger Release. (2022–4). Maestro, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2022.
Chapter 8 Metabolic and hormonal responses of medicinal and aromatic plants 325
[110] Schrödinger Release. (2022–4). Protein Preparation Wizard, Epik, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY,
2022. Impact, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY; Prime, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2022. [111] Schrödinger Release. (2022–4). LigPrep, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2022.
[112] Shahzadi, I., Zahoor, A. F., Tüzün, B., Mansha, A., Anjum, M. N., Rasul, A. . . . and Mojzych, M. (2022).
Repositioning of acefylline as anti-cancer drug: Synthesis, anticancer and computational studies of azomethines derived from acefylline tethered 4-amino-3-mercapto-1, 2, 4-triazole. Plos One, 17(12), e0278027.
[113] El Faydy, M., Lakhrissi, L., Dahaieh, N., Ounine, K., Tüzün, B., Chahboun, N. . . . and Zarrouk,
A. (2024). Synthesis, biological properties, and molecular docking study of novel 1, 2, 3-triazole-8-
quinolinol hybrids. ACS Omega, 9(23), 25395–25409. [114] Schrödinger Release. (2022–4). QikProp, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2022. [115] Yadav, B., Dubey, R., Gnanasekaran, P. and Narayan, O. P. (2021). OMICS approaches towards
understanding plant’s responses to counterattack heavy metal stress: An insight into molecular
mechanisms of plant defense. Plant Gene, 28, 100333. [116] Arbona, V., Manzi, M., De Ollas, C. and Gómez-Cadenas, A. (2013). Metabolomics as a tool to
investigate abiotic stress tolerance in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 14(3),
4885–4911.
[117] Muhammad Aslam, M., Waseem, M., Jakada, B. H., Okal, E. J., Lei, Z., Saqib, H. S. A. . . . and Zhang,
Q. (2022). Mechanisms of abscisic acid-mediated drought stress responses in plants. International
Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(3), 1084. [118] Şimşek, Ö., Isak, M. A., Dönmez, D., Dalda Şekerci, A., İzgü, T. and Kaçar, Y. A. (2024). Advanced
biotechnological interventions in mitigating drought stress in plants. Plants, 13(5), 717. [119] Elrobh, M., Alanazi, M., Abduljaleel, Z., El-Huneidi, W. and Khan, W. (2017). Isolation, sequencing and
in silico characterization of promoter region of hspa6 gene from Arabian camel (Camelus
dromedaries). Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 27(6), 1806–1815. [120] Oshunsanya, S. O., Nwosu, N. J. and Li, Y. (2019). Abiotic stress in agricultural crops under climatic
conditions. In: Sustainable Agriculture, Forest and Environmental Management, 71–100. [121] Juan, C. A., Pérez de la Lastra, J. M., Plou, F. J. and Pérez-Lebeña, E. (2021). The chemistry of reactive
oxygen species (ROS) revisited: Outlining their role in biological macromolecules (DNA, lipids and
proteins) and induced pathologies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(9), 4642. [122] Dutta, T., Singh, H., Gestwicki, J. E. and Blatch, G. L. (2021). Exported plasmodial J domain protein,
PFE0055c, and PfHsp70-x form a specific co-chaperone-chaperone partnership. Cell Stress and
Chaperones, 26(2), 355–366. [123] Nguyen, H. C., Lin, K. H., Ho, S. L., Chiang, C. M. and Yang, C. M. (2018). Enhancing the abiotic stress
tolerance of plants: From chemical treatment to biotechnological approaches. Physiologia
Plantarum, 164(4), 452–466. [124] Ahanger, M. A., Tomar, N. S., Tittal, M., Argal, S. and Agarwal, R. (2017). Plant growth under water/
salt stress: ROS production; antioxidants and significance of added potassium under such
conditions. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 23, 731–744. [125] Godoy, F., Olivos-Hernández, K., Stange, C. and Handford, M. (2021). Abiotic stress in crop species:
Improving tolerance by applying plant metabolites. Plants, 10(2), 186. [126] Miller, G., Shulaev, V. and Mittler, R. (2008). Reactive oxygen signaling and abiotic stress.
Physiologia Plantarum, 133(3), 481–489. [127] Atkinson, N. J. and Urwin, P. E. (2012). The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: From
genes to the field. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63(10), 3523–3543. [128] Conde, A., Chaves, M. M. and Gerós, H. (2011). Membrane transport, sensing and signaling in plant
adaptation to environmental stress. Plant and Cell Physiology, 52(9), 1583–1602. [129] Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N. S. M. A., Fujita, D. B. S. M. A. and Basra, S. M. (2009). Plant
drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. In: Sustainable Agriculture, 153–188.
326 Esra Uçar et al.
[130] Janicki, M., Marczak, M., Cieśla, A. and Ludwików, A. (2020). Identification of novel inhibitors of a
plant group A protein phosphatase type 2C using a combined in silico and biochemical approach. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 526460.
[131] Umar, O. B., Ranti, L. A., Abdulbaki, A. S., Bola, A. L., Abdulhamid, A. K., Biola, M. R. and Victor,
K. O. (2021). Stresses in plants: Biotic and abiotic. In: Current Trends in Wheat Research, 1–8.
[132] Hewage, K. A. H., Yang, J. F., Wang, D., Hao, G. F., Yang, G. F. and Zhu, J. K. (2020). Chemical
manipulation of abscisic acid signaling: A new approach to abiotic and biotic stress management in agriculture. Advanced Science, 7(18), 2001265.
[133] MacRae, T. H. (2010). Gene expression, metabolic regulation and stress tolerance during diapause.
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 67, 2405–2424.
[134] Prasannath, K. (2017). Plant defense-related enzymes against pathogens: A review. AGRIEAST:
Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(1), 38–48.
[135] DeFalco, T. A. and Zipfel, C. (2021). Molecular mechanisms of early plant pattern-triggered immune
signaling. Molecular Cell, 81(17), 3449–3467.

Part III: Pharmaceutical use of medicinal plants

İlayda Bersu Kul, Gamze Tüzün, Burak Tüzün✶, and Elyor Berdimurodov
Chapter 9 Medicinal and aromatic plants used in burn treatment
Abstract: Burn injuries remain a significant public health concern worldwide, partic-
ularly in low- and middle-income countries. This chapter explores the therapeutic po­tential of medicinal and aromatic plants in burn treatment, emphasizing their anti­inflammatory, antimicrobial, analgesic, and wound-healing properties. Traditional remedies such as Aloe vera, Calendula officinalis, Centella asiatica, Hypericum perfo ratum, and Syzygium aromaticum are evaluated based on their phytochemical com­position, mechanisms of action, and clinical applications. The integration of tradi­tional knowledge with modern pharmacological science is highlighted, supported by molecular, omic, and in silico research approaches. Furthermore, innovative formula tions—ranging from herbal gels and ointments to nanotechnology-based wound dressings—are discussed in terms of efficacy, stability, and safety. The chapter also addresses the pharmacogenetic implications of plant-based therapies and the chal lenges of standardization, toxicity, and regulatory frameworks. Overall, medicinal plants represent a promising and sustainable alternative or complement to conven tional burn treatments, offering culturally rooted and scientifically supported solu­tions for wound management.
-
-
-
-
Keywords: burn treatment, medicinal plants, aromatic plants, wound healing, anti­inflammatory, phytochemicals, antimicrobial, traditional medicine
Corresponding author: Burak Tüzün, Plant and Animal Production Department, Technical Sciences
Vocational School of Sivas, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas 58140, Turkey, e-mail: theburaktuzun@yahoo.com, İlayda Bersu Kul, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Science Faculty, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas 58140, Turkey Gamze Tüzün, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas 58140, Turkey Elyor Berdimurodov, Chemical and Materials Engineering, New Uzbekistan University, 54 Mustaqillik Ave, Tashkent 100007, Uzbekistan; Faculty of Chemistry, National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent 100034, Uzbekistan
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0420-2043
330 İlayda Bersu Kul et al.

9.1 Introduction

Burns are serious pathological conditions that occur as a result of traumatic effects of thermal, chemical, electrical activity or radiation to the skin tissue, triggering inflamma­tory responses and increasing the risk of infection. Millions of people worldwide experi­ence burn injuries every year, and this situation poses a serious public health problem, especially in low- and middle-income countries due to limited healthcare services. The main goals in burn treatment are to accelerate wound healing, prevent infection, con­trol inflammation and manage pain. However, the limitations of modern treatment methods related to cost, accessibility, and side effects have increased interest in herbal treatments. Medicinal and aromatic plants exhibit anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, an­algesic, and wound-healing properties through bioactive compounds such as flavonoids, phenolic acids, alkaloids, tannins, essential oils, and saponins. These properties provide multifaceted effects that support the healing of both acute and chronic burn wounds. Plants such as Aloe vera, Calendula officinalis, Hypericum perforatum, Mentha piperita, and Syzygium aromaticum, which have been used in traditional medicine for centuries are prominent examples in this field. The effects of these plants, such as reducing burn­related inflammation, preventing infection and accelerating the regeneration of wound tissue, have also been supported by modern scientific research. For example, Aloe vera gel offers moisturizing, anti-inflammatory, and cell-regenerating effects thanks to its ac­tive ingredients such as polyphenols and anthraquinone derivatives, while Hypericum perforatum has antimicrobial and antioxidant effects with its hypericin content. Histori­cally, plants used in the treatment of burns represent one of the oldest medical practi­ces of humanity. The therapeutic effects of these plants have been passed down from generation to generation in different cultural traditions such as traditional Chinese medicine, Ayurveda, Middle Eastern folk medicine, and Anatolian medicine and have survived to the present day. Modern medicine integrates this traditional knowledge into pharmaceutical practices, supported by biochemical analyses and clinical studies. For example, Hypericum perforatum extract has found its place in modern pharmacy in the form of commercial ointments and creams. Similarly, clinical studies on the wound­healing effects of Calendula officinalis have popularized the use of this plant in medical preparations.

9.2 General properties of medicinal and aromatic plants used in burn treatment

Medicinal and aromatic plants in burn treatment attract attention as an area where traditional knowledge and modern science meet. The main factor affecting the use of these plants is the wide pharmacological effects provided by their rich phytochemical content and easy accessibility. Multifaceted benefits such as wound healing, infection
Figure 9.1: General properties of medicinal and aromatic plants used in burn treatment.
Chapter 9 Medicinal and aromatic plants used in burn treatment 331
control, reduction of inflammation, and pain management have enabled medicinal and aromatic plants to gain an important place in burn treatment [1]. General Proper­ties of medicinal and aromatic plants used in burn treatment are given in Figure 9.1.
9.2.1 Phytochemical content and mechanisms of action
Medicinal and aromatic plants perform their various biological effects through the bioactive compounds they contain. These phytochemicals provide a series of thera­peutic benefits in burn treatment by showing both systemic and local effects. Espe­cially anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, wound healing, and analgesic properties re­veal the pharmacological potential of these plants [2]:
1. Anti-inflammatory effects: Inflammation seen in burn wounds is one of the most important processes that delays the healing process and leads to complications. Medicinal and aromatic plants control inflammation and create an environment suitable for tissue regeneration.
2. Flavonoids: They reduce inflammation by suppressing the secretion of inflamma­tory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α and IL-6). For example, Aloe vera and Calendula offici-
332 İlayda Bersu Kul et al.
nalis (Calendula) exhibit strong anti-inflammatory properties thanks to their high flavonoid content.
3. Phenolic acids: They suppress inflammation caused by oxidative stress. Hyperi- cum perforatum (St. John’s wort) plays an effective role in controlling inflamma­tion with its phenolic components [3].
9.2.2 Antimicrobial effects
Burn areas are highly vulnerable to the risk of infection. Herbal components with an­timicrobial properties play a critical role in preventing wound infections [4].
Essential oils act by destroying bacterial cell membranes or disrupting bacterial
metabolism. Syzygium aromaticum (clove) oil has a strong antimicrobial effect against common pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Tannins, pre­vent the growth and reproduction of bacteria by binding with cellular proteins. Plants such as Mentha piperita (mint) are widely used for these effects.
9.2.3 Wound-healing effects
The wound-healing effects of medicinal and aromatic plants are associated with in­creased proliferation at the cellular level and support for collagen synthesis [5].
Polysaccharides promote cell renewal and increase fibroblast activity. Aloe vera
accelerates the epithelialization process with the polysaccharides it contains. Essential fatty acids contribute to tissue regeneration by preserving the integrity of cell mem­branes. Hypericum perforatum is rich in fatty acids that support the restructuring of wound tissue.
9.2.4 Analgesic effects
Management of intense pain in burn wounds is a critical part of treatment. Some com­pounds found in medicinal plants have pain-reducing properties [6].
Menthol reduces pain signals in nerve endings by having a local anesthetic effect.
Mentha piperita (mint) is therefore frequently used in pain management in burn treatment. Phenol derivatives have an inhibitory effect on pain transmission. Syzy- gium aromaticum exhibits analgesic effects thanks to its phenol derivatives.