Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5217_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Also of interest
- •Contents
- •Part I: Introduction
- •1.1.2.3 Sustainability and future perspectives
- •1.2 Alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and other active compounds
- •1.2.1 Alkaloids
- •1.2.2 Flavonoids
- •1.2.3 Terpenoids
- •1.2.4 Other active compounds
- •1.3 Chemical structures and pharmacological effects
- •1.3.1 Chemical structures and effects of alkaloids
- •1.3.2 Chemical structures and effects of flavonoids
- •1.3.3 Chemical structures and effects of terpenoids
- •1.3.4 Structures and effects of other compounds
- •1.4.2 Flavonoids
- •1.4.3 Terpenoids
- •1.4.4 Other active compounds
- •1.5 Chemical structures and pharmacological effects
- •1.5.1 Chemical structures and effects of alkaloids
- •1.1 Introduction to medicinal and aromatic plants
- •1.1.1 Historical background
- •1.1.1.1 Historical background
- •1.1.2 Traditional and modern uses
- •1.1.2.1 Traditional uses
- •1.1.2.2 Modern uses
- •1.5.2 Chemical structures and effects of flavonoids
- •1.5.3 Chemical structures and effects of terpenoids
- •1.5.4 Structures and effects of other compounds
- •1.6 Aromatic plants in everyday life
- •1.6.1 The importance of essential oils and aromatherapy
- •1.6.2 Applications in the cosmetics and food industry
- •1.6.3 Food industry
- •1.7.1 Protection of endangered species
- •1.7.2 Sustainable harvesting methods
- •1.8.1 Protection of endangered species
- •1.8.1.1 Threats to endangered species
- •1.8.2 Conservation strategies
- •1.8.2.1 Protection of natural habitats (in situ conservation)
- •1.8.3 Participation of local communities
- •1.8.3.1 Education and awareness
- •1.8.3.2 International collaborations
- •1.8.3.3 Sustainable harvesting and trade
- •1.8.4 Sustainable harvesting methods
- •1.8.4.1 The importance of sustainable harvesting
- •1.8.4.2 Sustainable harvesting principles
- •1.8.4.3 Sustainable harvesting techniques
- •1.8.4.4 Monitoring and evaluating the harvesting process
- •1.8.4.5 The economic dimension of sustainable harvesting
- •1.8.4.6 International approaches and legal regulations
- •1.8.4.6.1 International approaches
- •1.8.4.6.2 Legal regulations
- •1.8.4.6.3 Protection of local communities and traditional knowledge
- •1.8.5 Many countries are protecting biodiversity
- •1.8.5.1 Global conservation efforts
- •1.8.5.2 Protected areas and conservation in natural habitats
- •1.8.5.3 Ex situ conservation and gene banks
- •1.9 Challenges and future prospects
- •1.9.1 Impacts of climate change
- •1.9.2 Genetic and biotechnological approaches
- •1.9.2.1 Protection of genetic diversity and breeding studies
- •1.9.2.2 Genomic and transcriptomic approaches
- •1.9.2.3 Culture tissue techniques
- •1.9.2.4 CRISPR/Cas9 technology
- •1.9.2.5 Metabolic engineering and synthetic biology
- •1.9.2.6 Bioinformatics and data analysis
- •1.10 Case studies and regional practices
- •1.10.1 Successful projects in specific regions
- •1.10.1.1 India: Ayurveda and biodiversity conservation projects
- •1.10.1.2 Brazil: sustainable collection projects in the Amazon forest
- •1.10.1.3 Turkey: protection and production of endemic plants
- •1.10.1.4 Africa: integration of local knowledge with modern practices
- •1.10.2.1 Documentation and protection of traditional knowledge
- •1.10.2.2 Scientific validation and application
- •1.10.2.3 Education and awareness
- •1.10.2.4 Patents and intellectual property rights
- •1.10.2.5 Public and private sector collaboration
- •1.11 Conclusions
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.3.1 Plant selection
- •2.3.1.1 Random plant selection
- •2.3.1.2 Plant selection based on ethnopharmacology and traditional uses
- •2.3.1.3 Plant selection by HTS technologies
- •2.3.1.4 Plant selection through virtual screening
- •2.3.1.5 Phytochemical databases
- •2.3.2.1 Comminution and homogenization
- •2.3.3 Extraction
- •2.3.3.1 Conventional extraction techniques
- •2.3.3.2 Maceration
- •2.3.3.3 Infusion
- •2.3.3.4 Decoction
- •2.3.3.5 Percolation
- •2.3.3.13 Pressurized liquid extraction
- •2.3.3.14 Enzyme-assisted extraction
- •2.3.3.15 Solid-phase microextraction
- •2.3.3.6 Hydrodistillation and steam distillation
- •2.3.3.7 Soxhlet extraction
- •2.3.3.8 Advanced extraction techniques
- •2.3.3.9 Ultrasound-assisted extraction
- •2.3.3.10 Pulsed-electric field extraction
- •2.3.3.11 Microwave-assisted extraction
- •2.3.3.12 Supercritical extraction
- •2.3.3.16 Bioassay-guided fractionation of plant extracts
- •2.3.4 Isolation and purification
- •2.3.4.3 Gas chromatography (GC)
- •2.3.4.4 Column chromatography (CC)
- •2.3.4.5 Ion exchange chromatography (IEC)
- •2.3.5 Elucidation of the chemical structure
- •2.3.5.1 Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
- •2.3.5.2 Mass spectrometry (MS) and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS)
- •2.3.5.4 UV-visible spectroscopy
- •2.3.6 Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy with bioassays
- •2.3.7 Preclinical and clinical researches
- •2.3.8 Structural modifications and developing new analogues
- •2.4 The use of omics technologies in drug discovery and development
- •2.4.1 Genomics
- •2.4.2 Metabolomics
- •2.4.3 Proteomics
- •2.5 Future scope
- •2.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Bioactive compounds
- •3.2.1 Alkaloids
- •3.2.2 Terpenoids (terpenes)
- •3.2.3 Phenolics
- •3.3 Industrial importance of biological active compounds
- •3.4 Industrial use of MAPs
- •3.5 Essential oils
- •3.6 MAPs in the dye industry
- •3.6.1 Use of MAPs in the perfumery
- •3.6.2 Use of MAPs in cosmetics
- •3.6.3 Use of MAPs in plastic production
- •3.6.4 Other industrial applications
- •3.6.5 MAPs in energy production
- •3.6.6 MAPs in agricultural applications
- •3.7 Salt stress
- •3.7.1 Nutrient
- •3.7.2 Productivity
- •3.7.3 Photosynthesis
- •3.8 Drought stress
- •3.9 Heavy metals
- •3.10 Heat stress
- •3.11 Soil pH
- •3.12 Light intensity
- •3.13 Pest and disease management
- •3.14 Conclusion and future perspective
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Toxic compounds and their effects
- •4.2.1 Alkaloids
- •4.2.2 Glycosides
- •4.2.3 Essential oils
- •4.2.4 Saponins
- •4.2.5 Coumarins
- •4.3 Poisonous medicinal plants
- •4.3.1 Digitalis purpurea (foxglove)
- •4.3.2 Atropa belladonna (deadly nightshade)
- •4.3.3 Aconitum napellus (monkshood, aconite)
- •4.3.4 Conium maculatum (hemlock)
- •4.3.5 Nerium oleander (oleander)
- •4.3.6 Datura stramonium (jimsonweed)
- •4.3.7 Ricinus communis (castor bean)
- •4.3.8 Taxus baccata (English yew)
- •4.3.9 Hyoscyamus niger (black henbane)
- •4.3.10 Cicuta virosa (water hemlock)
- •4.3.11 Veratrum viride (false hellebore)
- •4.3.12 Helleborus niger (Christmas rose)
- •4.3.13 Mandragora officinarum (mandrake)
- •4.3.14 Ageratina altissima (white snakeroot)
- •4.3.15 Bryonia alba (white bryony)
- •4.3.16 Colchicum autumnale (autumn crocus)
- •4.3.17 Chelidonium majus Linn. – Papaveraceae
- •4.4 Aromatic plants and poisons
- •4.4.1 Artemisia absinthium (wormwood)
- •4.4.2 Sassafras albidum (sassafras)
- •4.4.3 Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)
- •4.4.4 Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary)
- •4.4.5 Mentha pulegium (pennyroyal)
- •4.4.6 Eucalyptus globulus (eucalyptus)
- •4.4.7 Myristica fragrans (nutmeg)
- •4.4.8 Thuja occidentalis (white cedar)
- •4.4.9 Illicium verum (star anise)
- •4.4.10 Syzygium aromaticum (clove)
- •4.4.11 Juniperus sabina (savin juniper)
- •4.4.12 Pimpinella anisum (anise)
- •4.4.13 Lavandula stoechas (French lavender)
- •4.4.14 Artemisia vulgaris (mugwort)
- •4.4.15 Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree)
- •4.4.16 Pelargonium graveolens (rose geranium)
- •4.5 Safe use and precautions
- •4.5.1 Safety guidelines and precautions
- •4.6 Conclusions
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Effect of drought or water deficiency on the morphology of medicinal plants
- •5.4 Effect of drought or water deficiency on secondary metabolites of medicinal plants
- •5.5 Different approaches to mitigate the negative effects of drought stress on plants
- •5.6 Case studies
- •5.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Importance of medicinal and aromatic plants
- •6.3 Salinity effect on medicinal plants
- •6.3.1 Effects on growth and development
- •6.3.2 Impact on photosynthesis and water relations
- •6.3.3 Ionic stress and nutrient imbalance
- •6.3.4 Oxidative stress and antioxidant response
- •6.3.5 Impact on secondary metabolite production
- •6.4 Molecular responses to salinity stress
- •6.5.1 Amino acids
- •6.5.2 Proteins
- •6.5.3 Carbohydrates
- •6.5.4 Lipids
- •6.6 Study of alkaloids through proteomic and other approaches
- •6.7 Phenolic compounds during stress
- •6.8 Strategies for improving salt tolerance in MAPs
- •6.8.1 Exogenous application of plant growth regulators
- •6.8.2 Use of beneficial microorganisms
- •6.8.3 Genetic approaches
- •6.8.4 CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing
- •6.8.5 Agronomic practices
- •6.8.6 Use of mulches
- •6.8.7 Application of organic amendments
- •6.8.8 Silicon supplementation
- •6.8.9 Application of polyamines
- •6.8.10 Nanofertilizers and nanoparticles
- •6.8.11 Application of melatonin
- •6.9.1 Water relations and osmotic adjustment
- •6.9.2 Ion homeostasis and nutrient balance
- •6.10 Molecular mechanisms of salt tolerance
- •6.11.1 Genetic engineering strategies
- •6.11.2 Identification of salt-tolerant genes
- •6.11.3 Use of plant growth regulators
- •6.12 Conclusion and key points
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Heavy metals and their effects on the environment
- •7.4 Processes of heavy metal uptake by roots
- •7.5 Transport and accumulation in various plant tissues
- •7.8 Plant defense mechanisms against heavy metals
- •7.9 Molecular and genetic responses to heavy metal contamination
- •7.11 Selection of heavy metal-resistant plants
- •7.12 Case studies
- •7.13 Conclusions
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Metabolic and hormonal responses to abiotic stress
- •8.3 Water stress
- •8.3.1 Drought stress
- •8.3.2 Waterlogging stress
- •8.4 Temperature stress
- •8.4.1 High temperature (heat shock)
- •8.4.2 Low-temperature stress
- •8.5 Light stress
- •8.6 Salt stress
- •8.7 Nutrient stress
- •8.8 Heavy metal stress
- •8.9 Molecular docking calculation for stress
- •8.10 Conclusion
- •References
- •Part III: Pharmaceutical use of medicinal plants
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 General properties of medicinal and aromatic plants used in burn treatment
- •9.2.1 Phytochemical content and mechanisms of action
- •9.2.2 Antimicrobial effects
- •9.2.3 Wound-healing effects
- •9.2.4 Analgesic effects
- •9.2.5 Advantages and disadvantages of herbal treatments
- •9.2.5.1 Advantages
- •9.2.5.2 Disadvantages
- •9.3 Medicinal and aromatic plants used in burn treatment
- •9.3.1 Aloe vera
- •9.3.1.1 Clinical effects
- •9.3.2 Calendula officinalis (Calendula)
- •9.3.3 Centella asiatica (gotu kola)
- •9.4 Molecular basis of plant action mechanisms
- •9.4.1 Cellular mechanisms in wound healing
- •9.4.2 Innovative research methods in herbal treatments
- •9.4.2.1 Omic technologies: genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches
- •9.5 Formulation and application methods of herbal products
- •9.5.1 Pharmaceutical formulations
- •9.5.2 Dosage and application methods
- •9.5.3 Nanotechnological approaches
- •9.5.4 Factors affecting chemical stability
- •9.5.4.1 Stability enhancement methods
- •9.5.4.2 Importance of storage conditions
- •9.5.4.3 Stability tests and quality control
- •9.6 Clinical research and evidence-based practices
- •9.6.1 Clinical studies
- •9.6.2.1 Meta-analyses and literature reviews
- •9.7 Safety and side effects
- •9.7.1 Toxicological risks
- •9.7.2 Side effects and contraindications
- •9.8 Integration of traditional knowledge and modern science
- •9.8.1 Ethnobotany and traditional knowledge
- •9.8.2 Cultural and regional diversity
- •9.9 Future research areas and innovation
- •9.9.1 Pharmacogenetics and personalized medicine
- •9.9.2 Biodegradable and smart materials
- •9.9.3 Combined use of herbal treatments
- •9.10 Conclusion
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 COPD
- •10.3 Asthma
- •10.4 Pneumonia
- •10.5 Lung cancer
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Oxidative stress
- •11.2.1 Reactive oxygen species
- •11.2.2 Sources and generation of free radicals
- •11.3.1 Lipid peroxidation
- •11.3.2 Protein oxidation
- •11.3.3 DNA oxidation
- •11.4 Defense of the organism against ROS
- •11.4.1 Free radicals and antioxidants
- •11.4.2 Antioxidants action mechanism
- •11.5 Methods for determination of antioxidative activity
- •11.5.1 Methods based on hydrogen atom transfer
- •11.5.2 Methods based on electron transfer
- •11.5.3 Other methods for determination of antioxidant potential
- •11.6 Medicinal and aromatic plants as natural antioxidants
- •11.7 MAPs with antioxidant activity
- •11.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Definition, historical documents, and distribution related to the study of the usage of MAPs
- •12.3 Antibacterial activity of MAPs
- •12.4 Extracts and essential oils from MAPs as antibacterial agents
- •12.5 Compounds of essential oils with antibacterial properties and their activity against a variety of bacterial strains
- •12.6.2 Terpenoids from MAPs as antibacterial agents
- •12.6.3 Alkaloids from MAPs as antibacterial agents
- •12.7.2 Clinopodium nepeta (L). Kuntze
- •12.7.3 Lavandula officinalis
- •12.7.4 Helichrysum italicum
- •12.7.5 Mentha piperita
- •12.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 Medicinal and aromatic plant-derived extracts
- •13.2.1 Extraction techniques of MAPs
- •13.2.2 Influence of extraction operational parameters
- •13.3 MAPs in skin care products
- •13.3.1 MAPs as photoprotective agents against UV light and skin damage
- •13.3.2 Regenerative and wound-healing properties of MAP-derived agents
- •13.3.3 MAPs as skin anti-aging and whitening agents
- •13.4 MAPs in hair cosmetics
- •13.4.1 MAPs in hair products
- •13.4.2 MAPs in hair growth products
- •13.5 MAPs in oral hygiene products
- •13.5.1 Formulations for toothpaste and mouthwash
- •13.5.2 MAPs in prevention of dental caries
- •13.6 MAPs enhanced by sustainable materials in cosmetics
- •13.6.1 Nanotechnology in cosmetic formulations
- •13.6.2 Innovative nanocarrier materials
- •13.7 Conclusion
- •Abbreviations
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction

Chapter 5 Impact of drought stress on the medicinal and aromatic plants’ biochemistry 213
ter, longest lateral shoot length, root length, shoot yield, and dry leaf yield were observed under T1 (unstressed conditions). In contrast, the highest levels of proline, soluble carbohydrates, and root development were recorded under T4 (40% field capacity).
While drought stress negatively affected most morphological traits and flowering shoot
yield, it led to an increase in root length, proline accumulation, and soluble carbohydrates in flowering shoots.
The effect of drought stress on the quality and quantity yield of Thymus vulgaris
was evaluated under field and laboratory conditions [88]. The study that included five
different stress treatments showed that drought stress significantly affected plant
height, flowering shoot yield, oil percentage, oil yield, thymol percentage, carvacrol
percentage, chlorophyll a amount, chlorophyll b, proline, soluble sugars, sodium,
magnesium, iron, and relative water content. The highest (2.22%) and lowest (0.74%)
essential oil percentages were observed at 20% and 100% of the field capacity, respectively. The maximum thymol percentage was at 80% (42.37%), 60% (42.52%), and 40%
(41.4%) of the field capacity.
Irrigation causes significant changes in the morphological and biochemical properties of Ocimum species [89]. The same researchers reported that while fresh and dry
biomass yields increased in irrigated plants, there was no significant change in essential oil yield and composition of main compounds among the treatments. However, a
slight increase was observed in camphor, nerol, and trans-β-caryophyllene ratios. On
the other hand, drought stress increased EO content, polyphenol content, and antioxidant capacity. Moreover, drought stress had a positive effect on 1,8-cineole and eugenol ratios. Morphological and biochemical variations were also detected among basil
species. Accordingly, higher biomass and essential oil yield among the species were
obtained from O. basilicum and O. × africanum, respectively.
Plants respond to various abiotic and biotic signals that affect their growth and
development. Although the responses vary from plant to plant, the growth and development of medicinal plants, in short, their responses to environmental stresses depend on the genotype. In their study with 10 different fennel genotypes, Poudineh
et al. [90] stated that water stress has different effects on different varieties and
causes various physiological and biological changes in fennel plants, one of which is
the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the cell.
Torun et al. [91] investigated the physiological and biochemical responses of
ninety-day-old Hypericum perforatum seedlings by exposing them to three weeks of
drought. The results revealed that it decreased leaf length, relative water content, osmotic potential, chlorophyll fluorescence, increased lipid peroxidation, hydrogen peroxide, proline content, superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione reductase, and
decreased peroxidase and ascorbate peroxidase activities.
Basil plants changed the number and size of stomata, depending on the severity
of drought they were exposed to for 3 months, and accordingly, partial changes occurred in their phytochemical contents [62]. When drought levels were compared
with the control subject, obvious phytochemical changes were observed.

214 Gülen Özyazıcı and Negar Valizadeh
Baudoin et al. [92] applied five different irrigation regimes (severe over-irrigation,
moderate over-irrigation, standard irrigation, moderate under-irrigation, and severe
under-irrigation) to Oregano (thyme) and rosemary plants, and while Oregano phytochemical ratios increased significantly under moderate under-irrigation, there was no
change in rosemary phytochemical ratios. Researchers reported that the fact that the
phytochemical ratios of rosemary did not change under drought stress may be due to
some morphological characteristics of rosemary, and the plant’s ability to keep stomatal
opening under tight control throughout the day and its ability to develop tolerance to
stress by activating some mechanisms in its leaves.
In a study evaluating three irrigation regimes in ten black cumin (Nigella sativa L.)
genotypes, water stress increased the activities of carotenoids, proline, total soluble carbohydrates, malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and catalase and ascorbate peroxidase, but decreased the relative water content and chlorophyll content. These physiological changes varied according to the genotypes [93].
In a separate study, under lysimeter conditions at Shahid Sadoughi’s combating
desertification research station, Rad et al. [94] investigated the effect of three different
water constraints (100%, 70%, and 40% of field capacity) on Eucalyptus camaldulensis
Dehnh. Results revealed that mild drought stress resulted in increased essential oil
yield, water use efficiency, and 1,8-cineole production, but reduced or stopped the
production of many other compounds.
In a water stress study of Mexican marigold (Tagetes minuta L.) at 100%, 75%, 50%,
and 25% of field capacity, growth responses, oxidative stress indicators, and phytochemical variations were recorded in stressed and unstressed plants. Photosynthetic pigments and relative water content decreased in stressed plants, but malondialdehyde,
osmolyte compounds, and total phenol contents increased with increasing water limitation. Catalase, guaiacol peroxidase, ascorbate peroxidase, and polyphenol oxidase activities were also increased in stressed T. minuta plants, in response to drought stress.
Drought stress did not have a significant effect on the essential oil content of T. minuta,
but the essential oil composition was significantly affected. Drought stress changed the
proportions of essential oil components and induced the synthesis of new components,
including 1,8-cineole and germacrene D. T. minuta can resist water stress up to 75% of
its field capacity [26]. Thakur and Thakur [95] tested Chlorophytum borivilianum, Stevia
rebaudiana, Withania somnifera, and Andrographis paniculata plants under 50% water
deficit and different stress periods and showed different potentials in terms of growth,
yield, and physiological characteristics. The negative effect of stress on growth, yield,
photosynthetic rate, canopy temperature decrease, and chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/
Fm) ratio was higher in
Stevia rebaudiana and Andrographis paniculata compared to
Chlorophytum borivilianum and Withania somnifera.
Zhang et al. [96] investigated the effects of different water stress levels on root
biomass, secondary metabolites and endogenous hormones in roots, relative water
content, and tissue density in leaves of Stellaria dichotoma L. var. lanceolata Bge. The
findings showed that in root biomass, total saponin content first increased and then

Chapter 5 Impact of drought stress on the medicinal and aromatic plants’ biochemistry 215
decreased with increasing drought intensity. The researchers reported that moderate
water stress (60–70% or 80–90% field capacity) was suitable for root biomass formation and secondary metabolite accumulation, which were influenced by endogenous
hormones and water status.
In anise plant from the Umbelliferae family, drought stress decreased yield and
yield components (seed yield, number of branches per plant, number of seeds, number of umbels, and thousand seed weight) and physiological traits such as chlorophyll
content, relative water content, quantum efficiency of photosystem II, and cell membrane stability, while increasing leaf temperature. Otherwise, moderate drought severity increased anise essential oil content, while severe drought decreased it [97].
Drought stress is a major environmental constraint that severely limits crop productivity. Water scarcity caused significant decreases in umbels per plant, umbels per
umbel, fruits per umbel, 1,000 fruit weight, biological yield, and finally fruit yield, despite increases in fruit essential oil content under moderate drought stress conditions
[98]. In their greenhouse study, Soltanbeigi et al. [99] investigated the effects of different irrigation regimes and nutrient sources on the growth parameters and essential
oil components of Salvia officinalis. Yield decreased significantly as drought stress increased, and essential oil content was observed in moderate and then severe drought
stress.
In another study, Mirniyam et al. [100] investigated the seed yield, essential oil
constituents, polyphenolic composition, and antioxidant capacity of ajowan (Trachy-
spermum ammi L.) populations under three (normal, moderate, and heavy) irrigation
regimes. The results revealed that both essential oil and seed yield showed significant
decreases as a result of water stress, while total phenolic and flavonoid contents increased under drought stress treatment.
An effective method to solve the water deficit problems in arid regions, which have
increased in recent years as a result of global climate change, is the development of
drought-resistant species. Shams et al. [101] conducted a study to develop droughttolerant ecotypes in Lallemantia royleana (Benth.) plants collected from Kalat in Khorasan Razavi province, Zakheh in Kurdistan province, Kondor in Alborz province, and
Jupar in Kerman province. Their studies revealed that drought-tolerant ecotypes produced greater dry matter and seed yields under drought conditions. Relative water content, photosynthetic pigment content, seed yield, seed oil amount, and omega-6 fatty
acid contents decreased under drought conditions in all ecotypes, while ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, superoxide dismutase and peroxidase activities, and phenol and proline amounts increased. Tavosi et al. [102] they examined the effect of plant characteristics of coneflower (Echinaceae purpurea) in drought conditions. Their findings showed
that drought stress caused a significant decrease in the growth characteristics of different coneflower, chlorophyll a, carotenoid, and chlorophyll b content. In addition, severe
drought stress (40% field capacity) caused a significant decrease in the phytochemical
compounds of coneflower; secondary metabolites were affected not only by genetics
but also by changing environmental factors.

216 Gülen Özyazıcı and Negar Valizadeh
Antioxidant activity of Cuminum cyminum L. seeds, one of the most common aromatic plants of Mediterranean cuisine, increased under dry conditions. While the essential oil content increased at moderate drought severity, it decreased as the drought
severity increased, and total phenol content also increased under drought conditions.
Moderate drought improved the number of umbels per plant and the number of umbels per umbel and seed yield of cumin seeds compared to normal conditions, but severe drought reduced it. This showed that cumin plant is moderately resistant to
drought [103].
Leaf area, and dry and fresh leaf weight were significantly decreased in Hibiscus
esculentus L under different irrigation regimes. On the other hand, protein content
decreased as a result of drought-affecting protein biosynthesis and degradation. Application of salicylic acid and ascorbic acid to plants under drought stress alleviated
the effects of stress [104]. Protein and sugar content of Satureja hortensis grown
under three different irrigation regimes were negatively affected. Drought stress affected protein biosynthesis, decreasing the amount of protein and sugar content due
to the photosynthetic process [105]. Similar to Hibiscus esculentus, Satureja hortensis
also alleviated the negative effects of drought. Antioxidant enzyme activities, essential
oil yield, and abscisic acid content of hyssop (Agastache foeniculum [Pursh] Kuntze)
were found to be high under drought conditions [106].
In Aloe vera (L.) Burm.f., under severe drought stress, the impairment of the ability of leaves to synthesize assimilates caused growth suppression, while mild drought
stress increased total phenolic and flavonoid content. Increasing leaf thickness, leaf
biomass, and gel production of the plant associated with mild drought severity increased. It also increased the photochemical activity in the leaves and changed the
amount of all secondary metabolites of vanillic acid produced. Mild water restriction
can be applied for secondary metabolite productivity and for better growth of aloe
plant [107].
Increased water stress in Chrysanthemum morifolium caused an increase in phenolic compounds such as chlorogenic acid, rutin, ferulic acid, quercetin, apigenin, and
luteolin. Investigating the expression of genes that play a role in the formation of
these metabolites under drought conditions and understanding the accumulation
mechanism of polyphenols against water stress may create new perspectives [108].
On the other hand, Mustafavi et al. [109] reported that many of the biochemical
properties of the valerian plant were significantly affected by water stress. The potassium, zinc, and iron contents of the leaves increased as the amount of available water
decreased to 70%, and the amount of these elements decreased as the level of drought
increased further. Interestingly, while the aboveground biomass and root biomass of
the valerian plant decreased with drought, its essential oil content increased. The fact
that belowground organ development and essential oil production are affected differ
ently by drought levels requires caution in irrigation in production.
The less studied S. dolomitic species of sage plant has gained importance due to
its antiplasmodial and anti-inflammatory properties. Moderate and severe drought in-
-

Chapter 5 Impact of drought stress on the medicinal and aromatic plants’ biochemistry 217
creases the production of sesquiterpenes, an important class of terpenoids for their
intended use, which has led to the application of controlled drought in the production
of secondary metabolites of this plant [110].
Drought and/or heat stress induced the accumulation of proline, sugars, glycine
betaine, and sugar alcohols (osmolites), including inositol and mannitol, in M. piperita
and C. roseus plants, while total phenol, flavonoid, and saponin contents decreased in
response to drought and/or heat stress, but the levels of other secondary metabolites
(including tannins, terpenoids, and alkaloids) increased under stress in both plants.
Researchers have emphasized that the application of abiotic stress (drought and/or
heat stress) could be a strategy to increase the content of therapeutic secondary metabolites of these plants [111].
Nanoparticles (NP) and growth regulators are increasingly being used to reduce
the negative effects of drought stress. In coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) plants exposed to drought stress, chlorophyll content decreases, whereas total soluble sugar,
superoxide dismutase, and peroxidase activities increase [112]. When coriander plants
were sprayed with salicylic acid and silicon-NPs to reduce the negative effects of
drought, increases in chlorophyll content, total soluble sugar, and activity of antioxidant enzymes occurred. Moderate drought significantly increased total phenolic content and total flavonoid content, essential oil content, and essential oil yield with SiNPs. Foliar application of silicon nanoparticles was determined to be more effective
than salicylic acid for improving the antioxidant potential and EO efficiency of coriander plant. Similarly, Mahmoud et al. [113] reported that the application of silicon, zinc,
and zeolite nanoparticles only positively affected the morphological, physiological,
and biochemical properties of coriander plant under drought stress. In a study investigating the combined effects of drought stress and nanosilicon application on the
morphological traits and essential oil content and composition of hemp (Cannabis sat-
iva L.), maximum plant height, number of nodes, and number of flowering branches
were recorded in 1.5 mM nanosilicon and 100% field capacity application, while the
lowest fresh and dry above-ground biomass was recorded in severe drought stress
(40% field capacity [114]. Mild water stress (80% field capacity) and foliar application
of 1.5 mM nanosilicon provided the maximum essential oil content, while the highest
cannabidiol content in essential oil was detected in severe water stress (40% field capacity) and 0.5 mM nanosilicon application. The findings showed that nanosilicon application improved the morphological characteristics of the cannabis plant and
changed its biochemical content and components under dry conditions.
In cichory (Cichorium intybus), root growth and cumulative inulin yield decreases
as drought duration increases [115]. The percentage of total inulin in roots increased
under mild drought stress and decreased under severe drought stress. Bat et al. [116]
stated that drought stress decreased the leaf area, relative water content in leaf tissues, and membrane durability index of echinacea (Echinacea purpurea L.) plant, and
increased malondialdehyde level and ion leakage in leaf tissues, while it did not affect
the leaf chlorophyll ratio.

218 Gülen Özyazıcı and Negar Valizadeh
It was determined that water stress and temperature increase negatively affected
seed production in Fagopyrum tataricum [117]. The use of mycorrhiza and vermicompost is recommended under stress conditions. Mycorrhiza, applied to buckwheat
under different stress conditions, was effective on phytochemicals, while worm compost increased aboveground biomass and seed yield.
In chamomile (Matricaria recutita L.), drought conditions caused a decrease in
plant height, flower yield, shoot weight, and apigenin content, but had no significant
effect on oil content or oil composition, maintaining the potential for biomass production. Despite the decrease in the agronomic properties of chamomile, the phytochemical properties of the plant did not change, indicating that chamomile is a moderately
drought-resistant medicinal plant [118]. Shoot fresh and dry weight, root fresh weight,
and shoot length of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) plant did not show any difference under drought stress conditions (75% field capacity) compared to normal conditions (100% field capacity) [119]. On the other hand, under drought stress conditions
at 75% of field capacity, root length increased, and root dry weight, leaf area, and leaf
number decreased significantly under drought conditions. In contrast to these
changes in roots and leaves, quercetin, trans-ferulic acid, hesperidin, eugenol, hesperetin, and rosmarinic acid amounts increased under drought stress at 25% field capacity. Kharazi and Asgharzadeh [120] reported that in Nigella sativa L., plant growth
traits decreased with increasing drought severity, but foliar salicylic acid application
alleviated the adverse effects of drought stress.
In Rosa damascena Herrm., grown in drought conditions, flower yield decreased,
and irrigation regime significantly affected essential oil yield and some components
in essential oil. Drought stress increased the amount of citronellol and geraniol in essential oil, and decreased the amount of nonadecane, eicosane, and heneicosan [121].
This situation proves that the components in the essential oil of R. damascena can be
changed and managed by water stress. The response of Damascus rose to drought and
the mechanisms that mediate this response are unknown. In a study conducted by
water-restricted R. damascena, it was determined that water stress significantly reduced the fresh and dry weights of the plant and all photosynthetic parameters, except leaf temperature [122]. Apoplastic water fraction did not change significantly in
response to water stress. R. damascena underwent an osmotic adjustment in response
to water stress, resulting from active accumulation of soluble carbohydrates and, to a
lesser extent, proline under mild stress and tissue dehydration (passive osmotic adjustment) under severe stress. Farahani et al. [123] showed that the quality and quantity of Rosa damascena could be increased by foliar application of potassium silicate
under water deficit stress equal to 50% and 25% of plant water requirement. Plant
biomass of Stevia rebaudiana, an economically important medicinal plant, decreased
after drought treatments [124]. The photosynthetic properties decreased by drought
included intercellular CO
, net photosynthesis, chlorophylls, carotenoids, and water
2
use efficiency, followed by the decrease in carbohydrates. Under water stress, reactive
oxygen species accumulated and hydrogen peroxide production increased in plants.

Chapter 5 Impact of drought stress on the medicinal and aromatic plants’ biochemistry 219
Drought stress also caused the accumulation of proline and glycine betaine. The results showed that carbohydrates and plant growth were reduced. These results indicate that water deficiency is an important criterion for Stevia plants used in vegetative parts.
In Lycoris aurea, grown under drought conditions, increased plant growth is restricted, causing an increase in the fresh weight of the bulb, a decrease in the chlorophyll content, and a decrease in the maximum net photosynthesis rate of the leaves
[125]. In contrast, galanthamine and lycorine alkaloids in the bulb increased. Mild
water stress increased the galanthamine and lycorine contents to the maximum level.
These results indicate that L. aurea has a water requirement during vegetative growth
periods, and plants should be subjected to mild water restriction in order to increase
their alkaloid content in advanced growth stages.
Interestingly, in the saffron plant (Crocus sativus L.), one of the most expensive
spice plants in the world, the increase in the severity of drought stress caused an increase in secondary metabolites (crocin, picrocrocin, and safranal) [126–128]. In contrast, the dry weight of corm decreased due to drought stress. Methyl jasmonate and
auxin applications were reported to have the potential to reduce the negative effects
of drought stress. However, more research is needed on this subject to understand
these effects comprehensively.
5.7 Conclusions
Drought affects the morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics of
medicinal plants. Medicinal plants respond to drought not only by decreasing yields
but also by changing the amount and content of secondary metabolites. This situation
causes medicinal plants to lose their economic importance. In drought or water deficiency, signals are transmitted from roots to leaves via xylem vascular bundles and
stomata partially close. This causes gas exchange in the cell to slow down, free radicals such as hydrogen peroxide and superoxide, and increase reactive oxygen species.
As a result, the biosynthesis of secondary compounds (such as volatile oil content,
phenols, terpenoids, alkaloids, glycosides, and flavonoids) decreases, cells and tissues
are damaged and, depending on the severity of drought, the death of the plant occurs.
Therefore, the development of drought-resistant varieties should be the primary goal
in breeding programs for medicinal, aromatic, and spice plants, whose secondary metabolites are of economic importance.

220 Gülen Özyazıcı and Negar Valizadeh
References
[1] Tiryaki, İ. (2018). Adaptation mechanisms of some field plants against to salt stress. KSU Journal of
Natural Sciences, 21(5), 800–808.
[2] Blum, A. and Jordan, W. R. (1985). Breeding crop varieties for stress environments. Critical Reviews
in Plant Sciences, 2(3), 199–238.
[3] Farooq, M., Hussain, M., Wahid, A. and Siddique, K. H. M. (2012). Drought stress in plants: An
overview. Plant Responses to Drought Stress: From Morphological to Molecular Features, 1–33.
[4] Deblonde, P. M. K. and Ledent, J.-F. (2001). Effects of moderate drought conditions on green leaf
number, stem height, leaf length and tuber yield of potato cultivars. European Journal of
Agronomy, 14, 31–41.
[5] Bettaieb, I., Zakhama, N., Wannes, W. A., Kchouk, M. and Marzouk, B. (2009). Water deficit effects
on Salvia officinalis fatty acids and essential oils composition. Scientia Horticulturae, 120(2), 271–275.
[6] Nasir, M. W. and Toth, Z. (2022). Effect of drought stress on potato production: A review. Agronomy,
12, 635.
[7] Kim, Y., Chung, Y. S., Lee, E., Tripathi, P., Heo, S. and Kim, K. H. (2020). Root response to drought
stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(4), 1513.
[8] Mahajan, S. and Tuteja, N. (2005). Cold, salinity and drought stresses: An overview. Archives of
Biochemistry & Biophysics, 444(2), 139–158.
[9] Elena, M., Katarína, K., Ivana, V. and Zuzana, K. (2019). Responses of medicinal plants to abiotic
stresses. In: Handbook of Plant Crop Stress, 4th Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
[10] Hossain, A., Pamanick, B., Venugopalan, V. K., Ibrahimova, U., Rahman, M. A., Siyal, A. L., Maitra, S.,
Chatteriee, S. and Aftab, T. (2022). Emerging roles of plant growth regulators for plants adaptation
to abiotic stress–induced oxidative stress. Emerging Plant Growth Regulators in Agriculture
Academic Press, 1, 1–72.
[11] De Abreu, I. N. and Mazzafera, P. (2005). Effect of water and temperature stress on the content of
active constituents of Hypericum brasiliense Choisy. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 43(3),
241–248.
[12] Jaleel, C. A., Gopi, R., Sankar, B., Gomathinayagam, M. and Panneerselvam, R. (2008). Differential
responses in water use efficiency in two varieties of Catharanthus roseus under drought stress.
Comptes Rendus Biologies, 331(1), 42–47.
[13] Zhu, Z., Liang, Z., Han, R. and Wang, X. (2009). Impact of fertilization on drought response in the
medicinal herb Bupleurum chinense D.C.: Growth and saikosaponin production. Industrial Crops and
Products, 29(2–3), 629–633.
[14] Singh-Sangwan, N., Farooqi, A. H. A., Shabih, F. and Sangwan, R. S. (2001). Regulation of essential
oil production in plants. Plant Growth Regulators, 34, 3–2.
[15] Jaleel, C. A., Manivannan, P., Kishorekumar, A., Sankar, B., Gopi, R., Somasundaram, R. and
Panneerselvam, R. (2007). Alterations in osmoregulation, antioxidant enzymes and indole alkaloid
levels in Catharanthus roseus exposed to water deficit. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 59(2),
150–157.
[16] Tátrai, Z. A., Sanoubar, R., Pluhár, Z., Mancarella, S., Orsini, F. and Gianquinto, G. (2016).
Morphological and physiological plant responses to drought stress in Thymus citriodorus.
International Journal of Agronomy, 2016(1), 4165750.
[17] Yadav, B., Jogawat, A., Rahman, M. S. and Narayan, O. P. (2021). Secondary metabolites in the
drought stress tolerance of crop plants: A review. Gene Reports, 23, 101040.
[18] Rouphael, Y., Cardarelli, M., Schwarz, D., Franken, P. and Colla, G. (2012). Effects of drought on
nutrient uptake and assimilation in vegetable crops. In: Aroca, R. (editor) Plant Responses to
Drought Stress, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 171–195.

Chapter 5 Impact of drought stress on the medicinal and aromatic plants’ biochemistry 221
[19] Pirasteh-Anosheh, H., Saed-Moucheshi, A., Pakniyat, H. and Pessarakli, M. (2016). Stomatal
responses to drought stress. Water Stress and Crop Plants: A Sustainable Approach, 1, 2440.
[20] Hund, A., Ruta, N. and Liedgens, M. (2009). Rooting depth and water use efficiency of tropical maize
inbred lines, differing in drought tolerance. Plant & Soil, 318, 311–325.
[21] Singh-Sangwan, N., Farooqi, A. H. A. and Singh-Sangwan, R. (1994). Effect of drought stress on
growth and essential oil metabolism in lemon grasses. New Phytologist, 128(1), 173–179.
[22] Asadi, S., Lebaschy, M. H., Khourgami, A. and Rad, A. H. S. (2012). Effect of drought stress on the
morphology of three Salvia sclarea populations. Annals of Biological Research, 3(9), 4503–4507.
[23] Lebaschi, M. H. and Sharifi Ashurabadi, A. (2004). Growth indices of some medicinal plants under
different water stresses. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, 20, 249–261.
[24] Letchamo, W., Marquard, R., Holzl, J. and Gosselin, A. (1994). Effects of water supply and light
intensity on growth and essential oil of two Thymus vulgaris selections. Angewandte Botanik, 68,
83–88.
[25] Misra, A. and Srivastava, N. K. (2000). Influence of water stress on Japanese mint. Journal of Herbs,
Spices, and Medicinal Plants, 7, 51–58.
[26] Babaei, K., Moghaddam, M., Farhadi, N. and Pirbalouti, A. G. (2021). Morphological, physiological
and phytochemical responses of Mexican marigold (Tagetes minuta L.) to drought stress. Scientia
Horticulturae, 284, 110116.
[27] Hassani, A. and Omidbeigi, R. (2002). The effect of water stress on some morphological,
physiological and metabolic characteristics of basil. Journal of Agricultural Science, 12, 47–59.
[28] Farahani, H. A., Valadabadi, S. A., Daneshian, J., Shiranirad, A. H. and Khalvati, M. A. (2009).
Medicinal and aromatic plants farming under drought conditions. Journal of Horticulture and
Forestry, 1(6), 086–092.
[29] Aliabadi, F. H., Lebaschi, M. H., Shiranirad, A. H., Valadabadi, A. R. and Daneshian, J. (2008). Effects
of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, different levels of phosphorus and drought stress on water use
efficiency, relative water content and proline accumulation rate of coriander (Coriandrum sativum
L.). Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 2(6), 125–131.
[30] Mohamed, M. A. H., Harris, P. J. C., Henderson, J. and Senatore, F. (2002). Effect of drought stress on
the yield and composition of volatile oils of drought tolerant and non-drought-tolerant clones of
Tagetes minuta. Planta Medica, 68(5), 472–474.
[31] Petropoulos, S. A., Daferera, D., Polissiou, M. G. and Passam, H. C. (2008). The effect of water deficit
stress on the growth, yield and composition of essential oils of parsley. Scientia Horticulturae,
115(4), 393–397.
[32] Miao, Y., Zhu, Z., Guo, Q., Ma, H. and Zhu, L. (2015). Alternate wetting and drying irrigation-
mediated changes in the growth, photosynthesis and yield of the medicinal plant Tulipa edulis.
Industrial Crops and Products, 66, 81–88.
[33] Khorasaninejad, S., Mousavi, A., Soltanloo, H., Hemmati, K. and Khalighi, A. (2011). The effect of
drought stress on growth parameters, essential oil yield and constituent of peppermint (Mentha
piperita L.). Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 5(22), 5360–5365.
[34] Pinheiro, C. and Chaves, M. M. (2011). Photosynthesis and drought: Can we make metabolic
connections from available data?. J Experimental Botany, 62, 869–882.
[35] Moursi, Y. S., Thabet, S. G., Amro, A., Dawood, M. F., Baenziger, P. S. and Sallam, A. (2020). Detailed
genetic analysis for identifying QTLs associated with drought tolerance at seed germination and
seedling stages in barley. Plants, 9(11), 1425.
[36] Akbari, S., Kafi, M. and Rezvan Beidokhti, S. (2017). Effect of drought stress on growth and
morphological characteristics of two garlic (Allium sativum L.) ecotypes in different planting
densities. Journal of Agroecology, 9(2), 559–574.

222 Gülen Özyazıcı and Negar Valizadeh
[37] Abobatta, W. F. (2020). Plant responses and tolerance to combined salt and drought stress. In:
Hasanuzzaman, M. & Tanveer, M. Salt and Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants: Signaling Networks
and Adaptive Mechanisms, Springer Nature, Switzerland AG, 17–52.
[38] Lima, A. L. S., DaMatta, F. M., Pinheiro, H. A., Totola, M. R. and Loureiro, M. E. (2002). Photochemical
responses and oxidative stress in two clones of Coffea canephora under water deficit conditions.
Environmental and Experimental Botany, 47, 239–247.
[39] Pinheiro, H. A., DaMatta, F. M., Chaves, A. R. M., Fontes, E. P. B. and Loureiro, M. E. (2004). Drought
tolerance in relation to protection against oxidative stress in clones of Coffea canephora subjected to
long-term drought. Plant Science, 167, 1307–1314.
[40] Ramachandra Reddy, A., Chaitanya, K. V., Jutur, P. P. and Sumithra, K. (2004). Differential
antioxidative responses to water stress among five mulberry (Morus alba L.) cultivars.
Environmental and Experimental Botany, 52, 33–42.
[41] Safaei Chaeikara, S., Marzvan, S., Jahangirzadeh Khiavi, S. and Rahimi, M. (2020). Changes in
growth, biochemical, and chemical characteristics and alteration of the antioxidant defense system
in the leaves of tea clones (Camellia sinensis L.) under drought stress. Scientia Horticulturae, 265,
109257.
[42] Pirzad, A., Shakiba, M. R., Zehtab-Salmasi, S., Mohammadi, S. A., Darvishzadeh, R. and Samadi,
A. (2011). Effect of water stress on leaf relative water content, chlorophyll, proline and soluble
carbohydrates in Matricaria chamomilla L. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 5, 2483–2488.
[43] Hosseini, M. S., Samsampour, D., Ebrahimi, M., Abadía, J. and Khanahmadi, M. (2018). Effect of
drought stress on growth parameters, osmolyte contents, antioxidant enzymes and glycyrrhizin
synthesis in licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra L.) grown in the field. Phytochemistry, 156, 124–134.
[44] Valentovic, P., Luxova, M., Kolarovic, L. and Gasparikova, O. (2006). Effect of osmotic stress on
compatible solutes content, membrane stability and water relations in two maize cultivars. Plant
Soil Environment, 52, 184.
[45] Kalefetoğlu, T. and Ekmekçi, Y. (2005). The effects of drought on plants and tolerance mechanısms.
Gazi University Journal of Science, 18(4), 723–740.
[46] Atkinson, N. J. and Urwin, P. E. (2012). The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: From
genes to the field. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63(10), 3523–3543.
[47] Seleiman, M. F., Al-Suhaibani, N., Ali, N., Akmal, M., Alotaibi, M., Refay, Y., Dindaroglu, T.,
Abdul-Wajid, H. H. and Battaglia, M. L. (2021). Drought stress ımpacts on plants and different
approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants, 10, 259.
[48] Moradi, P., Ford-Lloyd, B. and Pritchard, J. (2014). Plant-water responses of different medicinal plant
thyme (Thymus spp.) species to drought stress condition. Australian. Journal of Crop Science, 8(5),
666–673.
[49] Gulen, H. and Eris, A. (2004). Effect of heat stress on peroxidase activity and total protein content in
strawberry plants. Plant Science, 166(3), 739–744.
[50] Lakušić, B., Ristić, M., Slavkovska, V., Stojanović, D. and Lakušić, D. (2013). Variations in essential oil
yields and compositions of Salvia officinalis (Lamiaceae) at different developmental stages. Botanica
Serbica, 37(2), 127–139.
[51] Elmas, S. (2021). Responses of Salvia officinalis (common sage) to some abiotic stress factors. Journal
of the Institute of Science and Technology, 11(2), 943–959.
[52] Chung, I. M., Kim, J. J., Lim, J. D., Yu, C. Y., Kim, S. H. and Hahn, S. J. (2006). Comparison of
resveratrol, SOD activity, phenolic compounds and free amino acids in Rehmannia glutinosa under
temperature and water stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 56(1), 44–53.
[53] Liu, H., Wang, X., Wang, D., Zou, Z. and Liang, Z. (2011). Effect of drought stress on growth and
accumulation of active constituents in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge. Industrial Crops and Products,
33(1), 84–88.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
