- •Contents
- •Figures
- •Tables
- •Contributors
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 Overview
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 The roots of English
- •1.3 Early history: immigration and invasion
- •1.4 Later history: internal migration, emigration, immigration again
- •1.5 The form of historical evidence
- •1.6 The surviving historical texts
- •1.7 Indirect evidence
- •1.8 Why does language change?
- •1.9 Recent and current change
- •2 Phonology and morphology
- •2.1 History, change and variation
- •2.2 The extent of change: ‘vertical’ and ‘horizontal’ history
- •2.3 Tale’s end: a sketch of ModE phonology and morphology
- •2.3.1 Principles
- •2.3.2 ModE vowel inventories
- •2.3.3 ModE consonant inventories
- •2.3.4 Stress
- •2.3.5 Modern English morphology
- •2.4 Old English
- •2.4.1 Time, space and texts
- •2.4.2 The Old English vowels
- •2.4.3 The Old English consonants
- •2.4.4 Stress
- •2.4.5 Old English morphology
- •2.4.5.1 The noun phrase: noun, pronoun and adjective
- •2.4.5.2 The verb
- •2.4.6 Postlude as prelude
- •2.5 The ‘OE/ME transition’ to c.1150
- •2.5.1 The Great Hiatus
- •2.5.2 Phonology: major early changes
- •2.5.2.1 Early quantity adjustments
- •2.5.2.2 The old diphthongs, low vowels and /y( )/
- •2.5.2.3 The new ME diphthongs
- •2.5.2.4 Weak vowel mergers
- •2.5.2.5 The fricative voice contrast
- •2.6.1 The problem of ME spelling
- •2.6.2 Phonology
- •2.6.2.2 ‘Dropping aitches’ and postvocalic /x/
- •2.6.2.4 Stress
- •2.6.3 ME morphology
- •2.6.3.2 The morphology/phonology interaction
- •2.6.3.3 The noun phrase: gender, case and number
- •2.6.3.4 The personal pronoun
- •2.6.3.5 Verb morphology: introduction
- •2.6.3.6 The verb: tense marking
- •2.6.3.7 The verb: person and number
- •2.6.3.8 The verb ‘to be’
- •2.7.1 Introduction
- •2.7.2 Phonology: the Great Vowel Shift
- •2.7.4 English vowel phonology, c.1550–1800
- •2.7.5 English consonant phonology, c.1550–1800
- •2.7.5.1 Loss of postvocalic /r/
- •2.7.5.2 Palatals and palatalisation
- •2.7.5.3 The story of /x/
- •2.7.6 Stress
- •2.7.7 English morphology, c.1550–1800
- •2.7.7.1 Nouns and adjectives
- •2.7.7.2 The personal pronouns
- •2.7.7.3 Pruning luxuriance: ‘anomalous verbs’
- •2.8.1 Preliminary note
- •2.8.2 Progress, regress, stasis and undecidability
- •2.8.2.1 The evolution of Lengthening I
- •2.8.2.2 Lengthening II
- •3 Syntax
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Internal syntax of the noun phrase
- •3.2.1 The head of the noun phrase
- •3.2.2 Determiners
- •3.3 The verbal group
- •3.3.1 Tense
- •3.3.2 Aspect
- •3.3.3 Mood
- •3.3.4 The story of the modals
- •3.3.5 Voice
- •3.3.6 Rise of do
- •3.3.7 Internal structure of the Aux phrase
- •3.4 Clausal constituents
- •3.4.1 Subjects
- •3.4.2 Objects
- •3.4.3 Impersonal constructions
- •3.4.4 Passive
- •3.4.5 Subordinate clauses
- •3.5 Word order
- •3.5.1 Introduction
- •3.5.2 Developments in the order of subject and verb
- •3.5.3 Developments in the order of object and verb
- •3.5.5 Developments in the position of particles and adverbs
- •3.5.6 Consequences
- •4 Vocabulary
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.1 The function of lexemes
- •4.1.3 Lexical change
- •4.1.4 Lexical structures
- •4.1.5 Principles of word formation
- •4.1.6 Change of meaning
- •4.2 Old English
- •4.2.1 Introduction
- •4.2.4 Word formation
- •4.2.4.1 Noun compounds
- •4.2.4.2 Compound adjectives
- •4.2.4.3 Compound verbs
- •4.2.4.7 Zero derivation
- •4.2.4.8 Nominal derivatives
- •4.2.4.9 Adjectival derivatives
- •4.2.4.10 Verbal derivation
- •4.2.4.11 Adverbs
- •4.2.4.12 The typological status of Old English word formation
- •4.3 Middle English
- •4.3.1 Introduction
- •4.3.2 Borrowing
- •4.3.2.1 Scandinavian
- •4.3.2.2 French
- •4.3.2.3 Latin
- •4.3.3 Word formation
- •4.3.3.1 Compounding
- •4.3.3.4 Zero derivation
- •4.4 Early Modern English
- •4.4.1 Introduction
- •4.4.2 Borrowing
- •4.4.2.1 Latin
- •4.4.2.2 French
- •4.4.2.3 Greek
- •4.4.2.4 Italian
- •4.4.2.5 Spanish
- •4.4.2.6 Other languages
- •4.4.3 Word formation
- •4.4.3.1 Compounding
- •4.5 Modern English
- •4.5.1 Introduction
- •4.5.2 Borrowing
- •4.5.3 Word formation
- •4.6 Conclusion
- •5 Standardisation
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 The rise and development of standard English
- •5.2.1 Selection
- •5.2.2 Acceptance
- •5.2.3 Diffusion
- •5.2.5 Elaboration of function
- •5.2.7 Prescription
- •5.2.8 Conclusion
- •5.3 A general and focussed language?
- •5.3.1 Introduction
- •5.3.2 Spelling
- •5.3.3 Grammar
- •5.3.4 Vocabulary
- •5.3.5 Registers
- •Electric phenomena of Tourmaline
- •5.3.6 Pronunciation
- •5.3.7 Conclusion
- •6 Names
- •6.1 Theoretical preliminaries
- •6.1.1 The status of proper names
- •6.1.2 Namables
- •6.1.3 Properhood and tropes
- •6.2 English onomastics
- •6.2.1 The discipline of English onomastics
- •6.2.2 Source materials for English onomastics
- •6.3 Personal names
- •6.3.1 Preliminaries
- •6.3.2 The earliest English personal names
- •6.3.3 The impact of the Norman Conquest
- •6.3.4 New names of the Renaissance and Reformation
- •6.3.5 The modern period
- •6.3.6 The most recent trends
- •6.3.7 Modern English-language personal names
- •6.4 Surnames
- •6.4.1 The origin of surnames
- •6.4.2 Some problems with surname interpretation
- •6.4.3 Types of surname
- •6.4.4 The linguistic structure of surnames
- •6.4.5 Other languages of English surnames
- •6.4.6 Surnaming since about 1500
- •6.5 Place-names
- •6.5.1 Preliminaries
- •6.5.2 The ethnic and linguistic context of English names
- •6.5.3 The explanation of place-names
- •6.5.4 English-language place-names
- •6.5.5 Place-names and urban history
- •6.5.6 Place-names in languages arriving after English
- •6.6 Conclusion
- •Appendix: abbreviations of English county-names
- •7 English in Britain
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Old English
- •7.3 Middle English
- •7.4 A Scottish interlude
- •7.5 Early Modern English
- •7.6 Modern English
- •7.7 Other dialects
- •8 English in North America
- •8.1.1 Explorers and settlers meet Native Americans
- •8.1.2 Maintenance and change
- •8.1.3 Waves of immigrant colonists
- •8.1.4 Character of colonial English
- •8.1.5 Regional origins of colonial English
- •8.1.6 Tracing linguistic features to Britain
- •8.2.2 Prescriptivism
- •8.2.3 Lexical borrowings
- •8.3.1 Syntactic patterns in American English and British English
- •8.3.2 Regional patterns in American English
- •8.3.3 Dictionary of American Regional English (DARE)
- •8.3.4 Atlas of North American English (ANAE)
- •8.3.5 Social dialects
- •8.3.5.1 Socioeconomic status
- •8.3.6 Ethnic dialects
- •8.3.6.1 African American English (AAE)
- •8.3.6.2 Latino English
- •8.3.7 English in Canada
- •8.3.8 Social meaning and attitudes
- •8.3.10 The future of North American dialects
- •Appendix: abbreviations of US state-names
- •9 English worldwide
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 The recency of world English
- •9.3 The reasons for the emergence of world English
- •9.3.1 Politics
- •9.3.2 Economics
- •9.3.3 The press
- •9.3.4 Advertising
- •9.3.5 Broadcasting
- •9.3.6 Motion pictures
- •9.3.7 Popular music
- •9.3.8 International travel and safety
- •9.3.9 Education
- •9.3.10 Communications
- •9.4 The future of English as a world language
- •9.5 An English family of languages?
- •Further reading
- •1 Overview
- •2 Phonology and morphology
- •3 Syntax
- •4 Vocabulary
- •5 Standardisation
- •6 Names
- •7 English in Britain
- •8 English in North America
- •9 English worldwide
- •References
- •Index
110 O L G A F I S C H E R A N D W I M VA N D E R W U R F F
Our own view is that further studies are most likely to produce answers if they combine detailed philological work (or full consideration of relevant existing work of this type) with the use of theoretical tools. Although this chapter is based on the results of research accumulated over the years rather than on a completely new investigation of the field, such a combined empirical–theoretical approach is a line of recent enquiry that we think will lead to further interesting findings in the years to come.
We have adopted as a working principle the idea that changes first need to be described and only then explained. The result is a chapter in which description is preponderant; nevertheless, we also show for many changes what kinds of explanations have been advanced and where they are still absent. The best and most detailed explanatory work on English historical syntax so far has been structural in nature, in the sense that the rise and decline of syntactic constructions have been ascribed to specific structural properties of the language at the time concerned. This, however, is no doubt partly a result of the scarcity or relative inaccessibility of other types of empirical information for large periods of the history of English. The reader should therefore keep in mind that we present a picture of the subject that in many places is oversimplified, and not only because we have had to cram over a thousand years’ worth of changes in English speech and writing into a single chapter.
The basic method of presentation is simple: we first deal with the composition of the noun phrase (Section 3.2) and the verbal group (Section 3.3), and then move on to discuss the way these can be combined to form sentences, which contain clausal constituents (Section 3.4) arranged in a certain order (Section 3.5). Discussion of more complex phenomena, such as relative clauses, complementation, other types of subordinate clause, and also negation and interrogation, can be found in whatever section the phenomenon is most relevant to. Other topics have been included where they fitted in most conveniently; where necessary, cross-references are given to help readers find their way to specific subjects.
Further help is provided by Table 3.1 below, which contains a summary of the material dealt with in this chapter. It is organised as follows: in the first column, a list of the changes discussed in the chapter is found. They are ordered in the same way as the sections are, i.e. elements within the noun phrase are given first, followed by the four systems (mood, tense etc.) that play a role in the verbal phrase etc. The next three columns in each row show the overall changes that each construction has undergone in the three main periods of the history of English. The last column indicates where the relevant discussion can be found.
3.2Internal syntax of the noun phrase
Noun phrases (NPs) can occur in various positions within the clausal unit depending on whether they function as subject, as object (direct or indirect), as complement, or as part of an adverbial or prepositional phrase. These positions
Table 3.1 The main syntactic changes
Changes in: |
Old English |
Middle English |
Modern English |
section |
|
|
|
|
|
case form and function: |
|
|
|
|
genitive |
genitive case only, various |
genitive case for subjective/poss. |
same |
3.2.2; 3.4.2 |
|
functions |
of-phrase elsewhere |
|
|
determiners: |
|
|
|
|
system |
articles present in |
articles used for presentational |
also in use in predicative and |
3.2.2 |
|
embryo-form, system |
and referential functions |
generic contexts |
|
|
developing |
|
|
|
double det. |
present |
rare |
absent |
3.2.2 |
quantifiers: |
|
|
|
|
position of |
relatively free |
more restricted |
fairly fixed |
3.2.3 |
adjectives: |
|
|
|
|
position |
both preand postnominal |
mainly prenominal |
prenominal with some lexical |
3.2.4 |
|
|
|
exceptions |
|
form/function |
strong/weak forms, |
remnants of strong/weak forms; |
one form only |
3.2.4 |
|
functionally distinct |
not functional |
|
|
as head |
fully operative |
reduced; introduction of one |
restricted to generic |
3.2.1 |
|
|
|
reference/idiomatic |
|
‘stacking’ of |
not possible |
possible |
possible |
3.2.4 |
adjectival or relative |
relative: se, se þe, þe, zero |
introd.: þæt, wh-relative (exc. |
who relative introduced |
3.2.4 |
clause |
subject rel. |
who), zero obj. rel. |
|
|
adj. + to-inf. |
only active infinitives |
active and passive inf. |
mainly active inf. |
3.2.4 |
aspect-system: |
|
|
|
|
use of perfect |
embryonic |
more frequent; in competition |
perfect and ‘past’ |
3.3.2 |
|
|
with ‘past’ |
grammaticalised in |
|
|
|
|
different functions |
|
form of perfect |
be/have (past part. |
be/have; have becomes more |
mainly have |
3.3.2 |
|
sometimes declined) |
frequent |
|
|
use and form of |
be + -ende; no clear |
be + -ing, infrequent, more |
frequent, grammaticalising |
3.3.2 |
progressive |
function |
aspectual |
|
|
(cont.)
Table 3.1 (cont.)
Changes in: |
Old English |
Middle English |
Modern English |
section |
|
|
|
|
|
tense system: |
|
|
|
|
‘present’ |
used for present tense, |
used for present tense and progr.; |
becomes restricted to |
3.3.1 |
|
progressive, future |
(future tense develops) |
‘timeless’ and ‘reporting’ |
|
|
|
|
uses |
|
‘past’ |
used for past tense, |
still used also for past progr. and |
restricted in function by |
3.3.1; 3.3.2; 3.3.2; |
|
(plu)perfect, past progr. |
perfect; new: modal past |
grammaticalisation of |
3.3.3 |
|
|
|
perfect and progr. |
|
mood system: |
|
mainly modal verbs (+ develop. |
same + development of new |
|
expressed by |
subjunctive, modal verbs |
3.3.3 |
||
|
(epistemic advbs) |
quasi-modals); modal past |
modal expressions |
|
|
|
tense |
|
|
category of core |
verbs (with exception |
verbs (with exception features) |
auxiliaries (with verbal |
3.3.3 |
modals |
features) |
|
features) |
|
voice system: |
beon/weorðan + (infl.) |
be + uninfl. past part |
|
|
passive form |
same; new GET passive |
3.3.5 |
||
|
past part. |
|
|
|
indirect pass. |
absent |
developing |
(fully) present |
3.4.4 |
prep. pass. |
absent |
developing |
(fully) present |
3.4.4 |
pass. infin. |
only after modal verbs |
after full verbs, with some nouns |
same |
3.4.5 |
|
ne+verb (other negator) |
and adject. |
Aux+not+verb; (verb+not) |
|
negative system |
(ne)+verb+not; not+verb |
3.3.6 |
||
interrog. system |
inversion: VS |
inversion: VS |
Aux SV |
3.3.6 |
DO as operator |
absent |
infrequent, not grammaticalised |
becoming fully |
3.3.6 |
|
|
|
grammaticalised |
|
subject: |
|
|
|
|
position filled |
some pro-drop possible; |
pro-drop rare; dummy subjects |
pro-drop highly marked |
3.4.1 |
|
dummy subjects not |
become the norm |
stylistically; dummy subj. |
|
|
compulsory |
|
obligat. |
|
clauses |
absent |
that-clauses and infinitival |
new: for NP to V clauses |
3.4.5 |
|
|
clauses |
|
|
subjectless/ |
common |
impersonal |
|
constructions |
|
position with respect |
both S(. . .)V and VS |
to V |
|
object: |
mainly finite þæt-cl., also |
clauses |
|
|
zero/to-infinitive |
position with respect |
VO and OV |
to V |
|
position IO –DO |
both orders; pronominal |
|
IO–DO preferred |
clitic pronouns |
syntactic clitics |
adverbs: |
|
position |
fairly free |
clauses |
use of correlatives + |
|
different word orders |
phrasal verbs |
position of particle: both |
|
preand postverbal |
preposition stranding |
only with pronouns (incl |
|
R-pronouns: þær etc.) |
|
and relative þe |
subject position becomes obligatorily filled
S(. . .)V; VS becomes restricted to yes/no quest.
stark increase in infinitival cl.
VO; OV becomes restricted
nominal IO–DO the norm, introduction of DO for, to IO
clitics disappearing
more restricted
distinct conjunctions; word order mainly SVO
great increase; position: postverbal
no longer with pronouns, but new with prep. passives, interrog. and other relative clauses
extinct (some lexicalised |
3.4.3 |
expressions) |
|
only S(adv)V; VS >Aux SV |
3.5.2; 3.3.6 |
introduction of a.c.i. and for |
3.4.5; 3.5.6 |
NP to V cl. |
|
VO everywhere |
3.5.3 |
IO/DO with full NPs; |
3.5.4; 3.5.3 |
pronominal DO/IO |
|
predominates |
|
clitics absent |
3.5.2; 3.5.3 |
further restricted |
3.5.5 |
all word order SVO (exc. |
3.4.5 |
some conditional clauses) |
|
same |
3.5.5 |
no longer after R-pronouns |
3.5.6 |
(there etc.) except in fixed |
|
expressions |
|