Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Перевод и реферирование общественно-политических текстов из средств массовой информации. Учебное пособие

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
07.09.2026
Размер:
1 Мб
Скачать
☆
Unit 11. The case for multilateralism
рые разрабатывают и осуществляют свою собственную миграционную по­литику; странам происхождения мигрантов, транзита и назначения; и самим мигрантам», – заявил Антониу Гутерриш.
Договор обеспечит управление миграционными потоками в интересах го-
сударств и самих мигрантов
Луиза Арбур подчеркнула, что Договор, который стал кульминацией 18-месячных переговоров, является своего рода ориентиром для государств в их миграционной политике. В его основе лежат положения, которые должны обеспечить легальный, безопасный и упорядоченный характер международ­ных перемещений людей. Это соглашение не будет юридически обязатель­ным. Оно направлено на сотрудничество.
«Соглашение было инициировано самими государствами. Необходимость такого Договора по миграции связана с тем, что большое число мигрантов поги­бают, пытаясь добраться в другие страны, и что государства все больше теря­ют контроль над своими границами», – заявила Специальный представитель.
Она подчеркнула, что Договор является «подтверждением необходимо­сти соблюдения национального суверенитета и универсальных прав челове­ка при подходе к международной миграции в интересах всех».
В 2018 году число международных мигрантов во всем мире достигло 258 миллиона человек. 50 миллионов из них – дети. По словам Луизы Арбур, женщины составляют 46 процентов всех мигрантов.
Миграция является одним из основных двигателей развития современ­ного мира. Вместе с тем она создает множество проблем. Из-за нее госу­дарства лишаются талантливых кадров. Она разъединяет семьи и сопрово­ждается немыслимыми страданиями людей, многим из которых зачастую приходится трудиться в рабских условиях. Новый договор указывает пути решения этих проблем.
Отвечая на вопросы журналистов, Луиза Арбур сообщила, что Австрия, Австралия, Доминиканская Республика, Венгрия, Латвия, Польша, Словакия, США и Чехия заявили, что «отмежёвываются» от нового Глобального дого­вора по миграции. Ряд стран, по ее словам, – Бельгия, Болгария, Эстония, Словения, Израиль, Италия, Швейцария – еще обсуждают вопрос о приемле­мости для них нового Договора по миграции [24].
Русская служба новостей ООН
9 декабря, 2018 г.
71
Unit
12
Read and translate the article
The New Radicalization of the Internet
Jihadists and right-wing extremists use remarkably similar social media strategies.
Social media has played a key role in the recent rise of violent right-wing extremism in the United States, including three recent incidents – one in which a man was accused of sending mail bombs to critics of the president, another in which a man shot dead two African-Americans in a Kroger’s grocery store in Kentucky, and a third in which a man is accused of conducting a murderous rampage at a synagogue in Pittsburgh.
Each of these attacks falls under the definition of right-wing extremism by the Global Terrorism Database at the University of Maryland: “violence in support of the belief that personal and/or national way of life is under attack and is either already lost or that the threat is imminent.» Antiglobalism, racial or ethnic supremacy, nationalism, suspicion of the federal government, obsessions over individual liberty – these are all hallmarks of this network of ideologies, which is, of course, shot through with conspiracy theories.
Yet, even as the body count of this fanaticism grows, the nation still lacks a coherent strategy for countering the violent extremism made possible through the internet.
Instead, the fundamental design of social media sometimes exacerbates the problem. It rewards loyalty to one’s own group, providing a dopamine rush of engagement that fuels platforms like Facebook and YouTube, as well as more obscure sites like Gab or Voat. The algorithms that underpin these networks also promote engaging content, in a feedback loop that, link by link, guides new audiences to toxic ideas.
72
Unit 12. The New Radicalization of the Internet
This dynamic plays out around the globe. In Germany, one study showed that towns with heavier Facebook usage saw more anti-refugee attacks. In Sri Lanka and Myanmar, Facebook played a significant role in inciting violence.
While the motivations of violent actors may be different, the paths they travel toward violence are similar. Cesar Sayoc, the accused mail bomber, posted links on Twitter and Facebook to conspiracy theories about Hillary Clinton and illegal immigration. The accused Pittsburgh killer, Robert Bowers, was active on Gab, a social network established to harbor speech censored by mainstream platforms – including speech that many other platforms found too extremist. Two hours before the shooting, Mr. Bowers posted that a Jewish organization that aids refugees “likes to bring invaders in that kill our people. I can’t sit by and watch my people get slaughtered. Screw your optics, I’m going in.”
Gregory Bush – the man accused of shooting the two people in a Kroger’s and saying, when confronted by a white man, “Whites don’t kill whites” – was a more passive consumer of social media. But his most recent likes on Facebook skewed heavily to conservative media, and a longtime online acquaintance said that Mr. Bush’s tweets – which had long been peppered with infrequent casual racism – became more and more vitriolic over the course of the 2016 election.
There was no organization behind these attacks. The three suspects most likely never met or interacted with one another. This is the new shape of extremism: self-directed, internet-inflamed terrorists.
Radicalization might start with casual conversations among video gamers. What begins with a few racist slurs may lead to exposure to overt white supremacist propaganda. A seemingly innocuous YouTube channel may recommend other, more inflammatory channels, which in turn may recommend ever more extremist content – a network identified by the Data & Society Research Institute as the Alternative Influence Network.
We already know how dangerous this cycle of radicalization can be, because similar mechanisms have fed Islamist terrorism in recent years. Anwar al-Awlaki, the cleric who communicated with the 2009 Fort Hood shooter and coached a young man to try to blow up an airliner over Detroit, left a digital footprint that survived on YouTube for years after his assassination by an American drone strike in Yemen. Videos of his sermons, even anodyne history lectures or self-help coaching, were always popular, thanks to his pleasant voice and serious demeanor. Now they also have a martyr’s allure.
If a viewer clicked on the cleric’s earlier, gentler, talks, YouTube’s algorithms would point the viewer to one of his later sermons, like one describing why it’s a
73
Перевод и реферирование общественно-политических текстов из средств массовой информации
Muslim’s duty to kill Americans. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, one of the two Boston Marathon bombers, tweeted approvingly about Mr. Awlaki’s lectures. Chérif Kouachi, one of shooters who killed 12 people at the Paris offices of the magazine Charlie Hebdo in 2015, name-dropped Mr. Awlaki in a phone interview with a reporter before being shot by police. In death, as in life, Anwar al-Awlaki’s words inspired lonely, disturbed, or disaffected young men to kill.
By 2017, YouTube began to rethink its policies, and now all of Mr. Awlaki’s material – unless presented as news commentary or in a critical context – is banned from the platform. Facebook has long banned all of Mr. Awlaki’s videos. Both avow a commitment to combat hate speech, extremism and misinformation.
But platforms have been more tentative in dealing with the kind of right-wing extremism that focuses on white supremacy. Although organizations like the Anti­Defamation League and the Center for Strategic and International Studies provide information about these groups, official government sources are still crucial if there is to be an effective crackdown. Vast federal resources, for example, went into identifying the networks around Mr. Awlaki, who has been on a designated terrorist list since 2010.
But the government does not officially designate domestic terrorist organizations. The Trump administration has reduced or eliminated modest programs begun under President Barack Obama to counter violent extremism and deter recruitment, including among white supremacists. Mr. Trump has focused on Islamic extremism to the exclusion of other threats. Federal agencies do not even have common definitions of “domestic terrorist” and “domestic terrorism.”
Tech companies often draw on government lists to police their platforms for violent extremism. YouTube, for example, has long prohibited designated terrorists from having their own channels. For years, Facebook has banned the praise or support of organizations deemed dangerous or violent – a list at least partly informed by governments. (Facebook claims that it does not heavily rely on government lists.) Both platforms, along with Twitter and other technology companies, use a shared database of terrorist content – coordinated through the nonprofit Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism – to help take down extremist content faster. What the forum is capable of identifying is informed by what kind of information official organizations have about extremism.
While international terrorism has been the target of considerable attention and national resources, the threat from domestic terrorism has grown. Domestic terrorist attacks have been on the rise since 2008, and in 2017 alone there was a 57 percent increase in anti-Semitic incidents.
74
Unit 12. The New Radicalization of the Internet
Past decades saw violence by left-wing groups, environmental extremists and black nationalists, but while attacks from those groups have fallen dramatically, violence from the right has risen. Right-wing extremists in the United States, particularly white supremacists, have been responsible for the vast majority of at least 387 domestic terrorist murders in the last decade. Last year, 20 of the 34 terrorist murders in the United States were connected to right-wing extremism.
These are statistics compiled by the Anti-Defamation League’s Center on Extremism, the most authoritative source for documenting the phenomenon, since the government doesn’t even keep good track of the danger. During the Obama years, conservative media manufactured a controversy over a 2009 Department of Homeland Security report about right-wing extremism, claiming politicized oppression. Under pressure from Republican lawmakers, Janet Napolitano, then the homeland security secretary, rescinded the report, and her department rolled back its work on violent right-wing extremism.
So the tech industry’s failings are not it’s alone. (Of course, Facebook’s dragging its heels and downplaying the extent of Russian influence on its platform does not give rise to optimism that the industry is doing its best.) The complex interplay of terrorism, propaganda and technology requires a concerted response by government and business. Private corporations should not be put in the position of trying to thwart extremism with help from only a handful of nonprofit groups.
Major platforms are applying machine learning and other techniques to remove noxious content, but what good is the most sophisticated artificial intelligence when the actual intelligence that feeds it is inadequate and skewed by biases in American society?
These biases are reflected in government lists, in policy decisions by tech companies and in the enforcement of those policies by moderators. Yet it’s quite clear that while the core philosophies of white supremacists and jihadists differ, their recruitment strategies and propaganda efforts are frequently similar.
Will Fears, who was arrested at a Gainesville, Fla., rally in support of the alt-right personality Richard Spencer, compared himself to the Boston Marathon bombers, the Tsarnaev brothers, in an interview with The New York Times Magazine. “Maybe he saw a lot of things in the world that bothered him and just didn’t know how to deal with it,” Mr. Fears said of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the young man who so loved Anwar al-Awlaki’s lectures. “I can sort of relate to that.” [63]
The New York Times
November 24, 2018
75
Перевод и реферирование общественно-политических текстов из средств массовой информации
Vocabulary Practice
1. Give Russian equivalents to the following words and phrases from the article.
Right-wing, murderous rampage, imminent, racial/ethnic supremacy, suspicion, network of ideologies, conspiracy theories, coherent strategy, to exacerbate, to underpin, skew, vitriolic, innocuous, sermons, anodyne, demeanor, tentative, crackdown, domestic terrorism, rescind, noxious content.
2. Read the article again and fill the gaps with appropriate words.
1) / Antiglobalism, racial or ethnic …………………., nationalism, …………………. of the federal government/
2) / these are all …………………. of this network of ideologies/
3) / the nation still lacks a …………………. strategy for …………………. the violent extremism/
4) / which had long been …………………. with ………………….casual racism/
5) The algorithms that …………………. these networks also promote …………………. content/
6) Instead, the fundamental design of social media sometimes exacerbates the problem.
7) /a social network established to harbor speech censored by mainstream platforms/
8) But his most recent likes on Facebook skewed heavily to conservative media/
3. Fill the gaps with the missing prepositions in the following wordings.
1) accused … sending mail bombs
2) violence … support … the belief that
3) obsessions … individual liberty
4) shot through … conspiracy theories
5) the body count … this fanaticism grows
6) rush … engagement
7) … a feedback loop
8) dynamic plays … around the globe
76
Unit 12. The New Radicalization of the Internet
9) I can’t sit … and watch my people get slaughtered
10) If a viewer clicked … the cleric’s earlier
4. Explain and expand on the following sentences from the text.
1) Social media has played a key role in the recent rise of violent right-wing extremism in the United States.
2) While the motivations of violent actors may be different, the paths they travel toward violence are similar.
3) This is the new shape of extremism: self-directed, internet-inflamed terrorists.
4) A seemingly innocuous YouTube channel may recommend other, more inflammatory channels, which in turn may recommend ever more extremist content.
5) Tech companies often draw on government lists to police their platforms for violent extremism.
6) While international terrorism has been the target of considerable attention and national resources, the threat from domestic terrorism has grown.
7) Major platforms are applying machine learning and other techniques to remove noxious content.
5. Look for words and expressions in the article which are suitable for the following explanations.
1) a period of violent and uncontrollable behavior, typically involving a large group of people
2) about to happen
3) the state or condition of being superior to all others in authority, power, or status because of the ethnicity
4) make (a problem, bad situation, or negative feeling) worse
5) a compound present in the body as a neurotransmitter and a precursor of other substances including epinephrine
6) an indiscriminate and brutal killing of people
7) an advocate of the supremacy of a particular group, especially one determined by race or sex
8) harmful, poisonous content
6. Write a summary of the article.
77
Перевод и реферирование общественно-политических текстов из средств массовой информации
7. Translate the text into English.
Kompras: Борьба с радикализмом в академической среде Индонезии
Число студентов всех уровней образования, приверженных идеологии
радикализма и терроризма в Индонезии, довольно велико.
Джоко Видодо делает упор на сотрудничество с исламскими организаци-
ями, по сообщению Kompas.
Президент Индонезии Джоко Видодо подчеркнул, что искоренение ради­кализма и терроризма в академической среде является не только основной за­дачей государственных учреждений, таких как министерство технологических исследований и высшего образования, Национальное агентство по борьбе с терроризмом, полиция или Вооруженные силы Индонезии, пишет Кompas.
За борьбу с терроризмом и радикализмом в академической среде также несут ответственность общественные организации, особенно те, которые ос­нованы на исламе, считает он.
«Процесс дерадикализации теперь начинает осуществляться не только в правительстве, например, в Национальном агентстве по борьбе с террориз­мом для предотвращения или принятия мер, а также в полиции и Вооружен­ных силах Индонезии. Но важно то, что, например, Совет улемов Индонезии также сыграл свою роль, как и крупное мусульманское объединение Нахда­тул Улама или Мухаммадия», – заявил Джоко Видодо в кулуарах рабочего визита на Западную Яву 7 июня.
Основываясь на сообщениях, полученных президентом Джоко Видодо, число студентов всех уровней образования, приверженных идеологии ради­кализма и терроризма в Индонезии, довольно велико. Более того, появление идеологии терроризма и радикализма в академической среде не произошло внезапно. Это происходит уже давно.
«Этот радикализм не возникает внезапно. Это долгий процесс, а не вне­запный, не так ли», – сообщил Джоко Видодо.
Государственными усилиями совместно с сообществом необходимо пре­кратить развитие деятельности подобных групп. «Действительно, если мы посмотрим на обнародованные данные (идеология радикализма и террориз­ма), это число очень тревожит. Это то, что мы будем продолжать делать», – продолжил президент [10].
ИА REGNUM
7 июня, 2018 г.
78
Unit
13
Read and translate the article
There are now more than 300,000 people living homeless in Britain
A new report by Shelter shows Britain’s homelessness crisis is deepening – 320,000 people were homeless in Britain at the end of March this year, an increase of 13,000 people in just nine months
by Adrian Lobb
A new report by homelessness charity Shelter has outlined the scale of the
homelessness crisis in Britain.
According to the latest official data, 320,000 people were homeless in Britain at the end of March this year, an increase of four per cent – or 13,000 people – in just nine months. That adds up to 47 people becoming homeless each day.
The report, Homelessness in Great Britain – The Numbers Behind the Story shows the government is not getting to grips with the homelessness crisis.
The detailed report uses the latest figures from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. It compiles the latest statistics of people are homeless and living in temporary accommodation, rough sleeping, in hostels or being temporarily housed under the Children’s Act.
“Record numbers of people are sleeping on the streets or stuck in the cramped
confines of a hostel room”
The report also shows the rate of increase in homelessness is highest in the West Midlands, where homelessness has increased by 12 per cent. Yorkshire and Humber, and the North West of England, also saw increases in excess of ten per cent.
79
Перевод и реферирование общественно-политических текстов из средств массовой информации
Chief Executive of Shelter, Polly Neate, said: “These new figures show that homelessness is having a devastating impact on the lives of people right across the country.
“Due to the perfect storm of spiralling rents, welfare cuts and a total lack of social housing, record numbers of people are sleeping out on the streets or stuck in the cramped confines of a hostel room.
“We desperately need action now to change tomorrow for the hundreds of thousands whose lives will be blighted by homelessness this winter.”
The report suggests a range of drivers for this latest increase in homelessness.
“The causes are multi-faceted and complex, but certainly include lack of supply of decent affordable housing, lack of protection for private renters and freezes and cuts to welfare payments,” said Shelter.
And according to Shelter’s summary, this does not even cover the full extent of the homelessness crisis in this country.
“We do not seek to assess how many people are sofa-surfing or experiencing other non-officially recorded types of homelessness, so our results will always be to some degree the tip of the iceberg.”
With another harsh winter on its way, and rough sleeping up 169 per cent in England in the years 2010–2017, these figures outlines the need for urgent action.
The Big Issue asked leaders including Mayor of London Sadiq Khan, Welsh First Minister Carwyn Jones and Secretary of State for Communities James Brokenshire to outline their plans to prevent homeless people dying on our streets this winter.
Brokenshire told us: “This summer, I set out a wide-ranging plan to end rough sleeping by 2027 – backed by £100m – to help those on the streets get swift, targeted help.”
But austerity continues to bite, hampering efforts to get to grips with the crisis.
For while the Homelessness Reduction Act requires local authorities to take “all reasonable steps” to prevent people becoming homeless, there is a huge shortfall in funding to fulfill these obligations.
As charities and local organisations battle the fallout from cuts to local support services, the homelessness crisis shows no sign of ending. [31]
Adrian Lobb
The Big Issue
November 22, 2018
80
Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]