Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2725_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
31 Мб
Скачать
12 Core Competencies, Milestones, and Entrustable Professional Activities
119
16. Holmboe ES.The transformational path ahead: competency-based medical education in family medicine. Fam Med. 2021;53:583.
https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2021.296914.
17. Holmboe ES, Sherbino J, Englander R, Snell L, Frank JR, on behalf of the ICBME Collaborators. A call to action: the con­troversy of and rationale for competency-based medical educa­tion. Med Teach. 2017;39:574–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421
59X.2017.1315067.
18. Huddle TS, Heudebert GR.Viewpoint: taking apart the art: the risk of anatomizing clinical competence. Acad Med. 2007;82:536–41.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3180555935.
19. Institute of Medicine (U.S.), editor. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
20. Jones MD, Rosenberg AA, Gilhooly JT, Carraccio CL.Perspective: competencies, outcomes, and controversy – linking professional activities to competencies to improve resident education and practice. Acad Med. 2011;86:161–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/
ACM.0b013e31820442e9.
21. Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS, editors. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
22. Long DM.Competency-based residency training: the next advance in graduate medical education. Acad Med. 2000;75:1178–83.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888- 200012000- 00009.
23. Lucey CR, Thibault GE, Ten Cate O. Competency-based, time­variable education in the health professions: crossroads. Acad Med. 2018;93:S1–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002080.
24. Lyon LJ.Development of teaching expertise viewed through the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition. JoSoTL. 2014;15:88–105.
https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i1.12866.
25. McGaghie W, Miller G, Sajid A, Telder T. Competency-based curriculum development in medical education: an introduction. Albany: World Health Organization; 1978.
26. Newton W, Cagno CK, Hoekzema GS, Edje L. Core out­comes of residency training 2022 (Provisional). Ann Fam Med. 2023;21:191–4. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2977.
27. Newton W, Magill M, Barr W, Hoekzema G, Karuppiah S, Stutzman K.Implementing competency based ABFM board eligibility. J Am Board Fam Med. 2023;36:703.
28. Oudkerk Pool A, Govaerts MJB, Jaarsma DADC, Driessen EW. From aggregation to interpretation: how assessors judge complex data in a competency-based portfolio. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2018;23:275–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459- 017- 9793- y.
29. Sargeant J, Holmboe E.Feedback and coaching in clinical teaching and learning. In: Practical guide to evaluation of clinical compe­tence. 2nd ed. Marrickville: Elsevier; 2017. p.256–69.
30. Shaw T, Wood TJ, Touchie C, Pugh D, Humphrey-Murto SM.How biased are you? The effect of prior performance information on
attending physician ratings and implications for learner handover. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2021;26:199–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10459- 020- 09979- 6.
31. Spady W.Organizing for results: the basis of authentic restructuring and reform. Educ Leadersh. 1988;46:4–8.
32. Swing SR. The ACGME outcome project: retrospective and prospective. Med Teach. 2007;29:648–54. https://doi.
org/10.1080/01421590701392903.
33. Taylor D, Park YS, Smith C, Cate OT, Tekian A. Constructing approaches to entrustable professional activity development that deliver valid descriptions of professional practice. Teach Learn Med. 2021;33:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2020.178
4740.
34. Ten Cate O. Entrustability of professional activities and competency- based training. Med Educ. 2005;39:1176–7. https://
doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2929.2005.02341.x.
35. Ten Cate O. Nuts and bolts of entrustable professional activi­ties. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5:157–8. https://doi.org/10.4300/
JGME- D- 12- 00380.1.
36. Ten Cate O.The false dichotomy of quality and quantity in the discourse around assessment in competency-based education. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2015;20:835–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10459- 014- 9527- 3.
37. Ten Cate O.When I say … entrustability. Med Educ. 2020;54:103–4.
https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14005.
38. Ten Cate O, Chen HC.The ingredients of a rich entrustment deci­sion. Med Teach. 2020;42:1413–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421
59X.2020.1817348.
39. Ten Cate O, Schumacher DJ. Entrustable professional activities versus competencies and skills: exploring why different concepts are often conated. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2022;27:491–9. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s10459- 022- 10098- 7.
40. Ten Cate O, Taylor DR. The recommended description of an entrustable professional activity: AMEE guide no. 140. Med Teach. 2021;43:1106–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421
59X.2020.1838465.
41. Van Loon KA, Driessen EW, Teunissen PW, Scheele F. Experiences with EPAs, potential benets and pitfalls. Med Teach. 2014;36:698–702. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421
59X.2014.909588.
42. Van Melle E, Frank JR, Holmboe ES, Dagnone D, Stockley D, Sherbino J. A core components framework for evaluating implementation of competency-based medical education pro­grams. Acad Med. 2019;94:1002–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/
ACM.0000000000002743.
43. Yoon M, Kurzweil D, Durning S, Schreiber-Gregory D, Hemmer P, Gilliland W, Dong T. It’s a matter of trust: exploring the basis of program directors’ decisions about whether to trust a resident to care for a loved one. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2020;25:691–709.

A Practical Approach to Curriculum Development

BethanyD.Panchal andErickaBruce
13
Key Points
• Curriculum development is one of the most important tasks of managing a family medicine residency program.
• To ensure competently trained family physicians, resi­dency educators must adapt to new methods of providing education to “meet the resident where they are.”
• Understanding the audience of resident-learners and the­ory of teaching adults in the current environment is important.
• A structured approach to developing an educational plan will help the educator to stay organized and meet the end goal.
• Curriculum developers must remain exible and be aware of environmental elements and barriers that could change during the planning and implementation of an educational plan.
• Regular evaluation and feedback are crucial steps in cur­riculum development that will allow the residency pro­gram to provide the best education for their current residents.

Introduction

ing that we as educators listen, understand, and provide opportunities for learning that build on the resident’s past experiences. “Meeting our learners where they are” is not only an adage; it is the mantra that educators should strive to achieve.
Curriculum development is a challenging task which requires a fundamental understanding of the learners and how they, as individuals, best gain and retain knowledge and skills. The process of curriculum development needs to be consistent and reproducible so that outcomes can be tracked and the curriculum modied based on successes and failures. Our diverse resident-physician population will receive and process information in different ways. The delivery of the curriculum could be through any number of modalities including didactics, clinical experiences, small group discus­sions, simulation, or independent learning. Understanding the importance of diverse teaching techniques and approaches to education provides an opportunity to meet the resident­physician learner “where they are” in the process of their personal and professional development. In this chapter, we will outline various theories on adult learning and how they relate to developing a curriculum that will produce compe­tent family physicians who are able to function indepen­dently. We will explain a six-step approach to curriculum development.
In our patient and societal interactions, we often refer to empathetic care as “meeting our patients where they are.” [1] The key components of this idea are that we account for the patient’s need for medical care in the context of their envi­ronment, education level, family support, and other social backdrops. This concept is similarly true as we educate fam­ily medicine residents to attain competence in practice. Resident-learners come from diverse backgrounds, demand-
B. D. Panchal (*) · E. Bruce Department of Family and Community Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA e-mail: Bethany.Panchal@osumc.edu
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 R. Kellerman, G. Irwin (eds.), Graduate Medical Education in Family Medicine, Excellence in Medical Education 2,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70741-4_13
Adult Learning Concepts andApplication
The study of how adults learn has interested psychologists and educators for centuries. With each new generation, the way adults learn changes. To recognize the needs of the cur­rent adult resident-physician learner, it’s important to under­stand the changes in societal interactions which have impacted their educational process.
Take for instances this medical student:
Taylor is a 26-year-old medical student about to start her family
medicine residency at a large academic hospital. She lives alone
121
122
B. D. Panchal and E. Bruce
with her dog in a suburban apartment and when not in the hospi­tal, enjoys riding her bike, attending live music events and trying new restaurants in town. Taylor eases into each day checking social media and reading about local and international news on her smartphone. Throughout the day she toggles through various electronic interactions; her smartphone for playing music, the desktop computer for viewing a patient chart, a payment app to re-imburse a friend for lunch, and listening to a podcast before bed. Taylor is excited for the opportunities her future residency program offers including various outpatient elective rotations, the ability to volunteer at a local free clinic, and virtual and in­person educational conferences every week.
Taylor’s daily activities, specically her engagement with multiple electronic communication modalities, are common for her generation in the United States. Acknowledging the breadth of activities and educational modalities available and used by the current learner is important when considering how curriculum should be delivered to them. The majority (83%) of students who entered medical school in 2022 were between the age of 20–25 years [2]. Generation Z or “Gen Z” includes individuals born between the late 1990s and mid­2010s [3, 4]. According to the Pew Research Center, mem­bers of Gen Z are more racially and ethnically diverse than any previous generation, and they are on track to be the most well-educated generation yet. They are also digital natives who have little or no memory of the world as it existed before smartphones [4].
Knowing this, how should undergraduate (UME) and graduate medical education (GME) programs meet these learners where they are? As the needs of our learners change, so should our curriculum. To have a successful educational plan, educators and the curriculum they develop must be exible and allow for learner independence and personaliza­tion. Various learning theories and approaches to the educa­tion of adults have developed over time as generations of learners and the technologies they use have evolved. The fol­lowing section outlines some key learning theories and how they can be implemented in graduate medical education. The most common approaches to adult education incorporate the cognitivist, behaviorist, humanistic, and social cognitive and constructivist models of learning.

Cognitive Learning Theory

Cognitivist theory implies that knowledge is built and orga­nized by learners based on their previous experience and memory. Newly learned material is taken in by the learner and organized in their memory based on prior knowledge and experiences so that it can be successfully recalled [5]. Instructional strategies related to cognitive learning theory may include classroom lecture, case study, discussion, and reading [6]. One example found in residency education can be in traditional, classroom-based learning called Grand
Rounds. These presentations focus on specic medically related topics in a virtual or in-person format.
In grand rounds, the pedagogy is usually delivered by a physi­cian from a podium to a receptive audience of physicians and physicians-in-training, one of the latter of whom begins by pre­senting a patient case. Following the presentation, a physician expert in that patient’s illness, discusses the case, bringing in relevant peer-reviewed data and literature. There is then an open forum of questions, answers and alternative opinions exchanged between the physician expert and the physicians and physicians­in- training in the audience, providing another example of the uidity of (medical rounds) pedagogy. [7]
This type of presentation helps physicians by prompting them to draw upon the extensive body of medical knowledge they already possess. Similar learning opportunities include online modules, reading, lectures, problem-based learning, watching videos, and listening to podcasts.

Behavioral Learning Theory

As the name implies, behavioral learning theory focuses on an individual’s change in behavior in reaction to a stimulus. Perhaps the most well-known behavioral learning theory is classical conditioning as studied by Ivan Pavlov. Pavlov looked for situations in which he could produce a natural response (i.e., salivation) by using an unrelated stimulus (i.e., bell) [5]. Educators who focus on this orientation encourage effective behaviors by rewarding learners when those behaviors are employed. A simplistic way to think about this domain is that the external environment is lever­aged to cause the learner to adjust their behavior. Within this orientation to learning, the instructor is tasked with creating an environment where desired behaviors are reinforced and shaped. Therefore, behaviorists focus on building skills, meeting performance objectives and (like cognitivists) dis­playing increasing levels of mastery [6].
Simulation is an example of applied behavioral learning theory. Resident education today involves many different types of simulation. Examples include cardio-pulmonary resuscitation certication and learning how to perform joint injections on a training manikin. Residency faculty are charged with preparing realistic patient scenarios in simu­lated environments to aid in resident learning. Complex pro­cedures that are rarely performed by residents in the clinical setting are a good t for simulation. One published example of this was found in the use of simulation for surgical resi­dents learning airway management. In this study, residents felt more comfortable in their airway management skills after completing a multidisciplinary simulation scenario [8]. As clinical training time decreases (due to work hour restric­tions), the use of simulation has become an increasingly important avenue for residents to obtain familiarity with infrequently performed technical skills.
13 A Practical Approach to Curriculum Development
123

Humanistic Learning Theory

The purpose of learning from a humanistic perspective is for each individual to nd their purpose, grow, mature, and ulti­mately become self-actualized. Humanistic instructors sup­port learners along a highly personalized and self-directed path. Sources for learning and instructional strategies associ­ated with a humanistic approach include personality assess­ments, 360-degree feedback, individual coaching, reection exercises, personal development plans, and service-learning experiences [6]. We nd this type of curriculum in medical education through portfolio development, medical service­learning projects, mentoring, and development of individual­ized learning plans. Allowing the resident learner to explore their personal interests and take responsibility for their own education is particularly important in this theory [9].
In humanistic theory, educators should help learners with physical, psychological and emotional needs so they can bet­ter focus on their learning. A resident who is hungry, burnt out or dealing with ongoing personal issues will have a hard time concentrating and making the best out of their learning opportunities. Pairing residents with mentors and coaches, encouraging scheduled time off or employing interventions that focus on the personal and humanistic aspects of medi­cine are important components to successful learning.
cess in which meaning is developed based on experience [5]. Learners can have both personal learning and still “share in common knowledge” [5].
These two most recent learning theories, which are favored by Millennial and Gen Z students, allow for a more individualistic view on learning. This population of learners “has grown accustomed to learning environments in which multiple information sources are used and where opportuni­ties exist to interact with others in the learning process. They have also learned that multiple information sources are a common part of learning and that one expert may not be the only expert” [10]. These individuals are better networked than any previous generation “through the use of text mes­saging, internet usage, after school initiatives, community service efforts, team sports, cell phone use, instant messag­ing, and community-building media tools” [10]. Therefore, they expect and want these resources to be present in their learning environments.
Knowledge of the different educational theories presented here will allow medical educators to design a curriculum that ts the needs of the family medicine resident and ensure they are competently trained to become independent physicians. Next, we will discuss a six-step process to develop curricu­lum specically targeted for family medicine residency programs.
Social Cognitive andIndividual Constructivist Theories
The purpose of learning in social cognitivism is to master new roles and behaviors. This is often facilitated, whether formally or informally, by individuals who are more experi­enced. In a collegiate context, these role models may be upperclassmen, the captains of an athletic team, an inuen­tial member of a peer group or a person with a formal title in a student organization [6]. In residency program education, this is frequently demonstrated by escalating levels of responsibility and authority based on postgraduate year. According to this theory, learning comes by seeing behavior modeled by others. The part of the work where people can observe others is the source of their education. There is often little to no formal programming—the individual learns by observing the norms and ways of being exemplied by val­ued group members [6].
Two of the most common forms of constructivism are individual (also known as cognitive constructivism) and social. Individual constructivism emphasizes individual meaning-making, whereas social constructivism highlights the role of social interaction in knowledge development. Key assumptions of these models include: 1. knowledge is con­structed from experience, 2. learning results from personal interpretation of knowledge, and 3. learning is an active pro-
Curriculum Development andDesign
The word curriculum carries with it any number of deni­tions, depending on the situation. In the broadest sense, a curriculum is a “planned educational experience” [11]. In the world of medical education, an area of specialization (i.e., cardiology, behavioral health, practice management, etc.) becomes a curriculum when we want to assure an organized approach to teaching and learning [11]. We will spend the rest of this chapter offering high yield information for family medicine faculty members tasked with developing, restruc­turing, and/or improving a residency program curriculum.
In order to keep focused on the end goal of educating resi­dents to competency, it is important to have an organized approach to the development of a curriculum. Though there are many approaches that have been suggested for develop­ment of a curriculum that can be used in medical education, adopting a step-wise approach is recommended. We will ref­erence the widely cited six-step approach by Patricia Thomas MD etal. with examples from family medicine specic cur­riculum. The six steps are: 1. Problem Identication, 2. Needs Assessment, 3. Goals and Objectives, 4. Educational Strategies, 5. Implementation, and 6. Evaluation and Feedback [11]. A structured approach to the development of a curriculum is key to successful implementation and con­tinual process improvement. The steps of curriculum devel-
124
B. D. Panchal and E. Bruce
opment are not meant to be performed linearly. Rather, curriculum development is a cyclical process; each step overlapping or occurring simultaneously with the others as a “dynamic, interactive process” [11].
Identify theProblem
The rst step in the process of curriculum development is multifactorial. Several questions need to be answered when identifying the problem that the curriculum is to address. These questions will need to be answered: 1. What is the specic problem? If this is a new curriculum, why does it need to be developed? If this is a curriculum revision, why does it need to be revised? 2. Who does the problem affect and how? 3. What is the status quo? and 4. What should ide­ally be happening?
Changes in or need for a new curriculum may be affected by several factors such as availability of resources, changes in expertise or number of teaching faculty, interests of the learners, or dissatisfaction with the status quo [12]. Institutional changes within which the program works may prompt the need for curricular revision (i.e., the medical cen­ter institutes a quality improvement (QI) project focused on team rounding and patient satisfaction). Or perhaps there are new ACGME requirements that need to be met (i.e., pres­ence of a point-of-care ultrasound experience or a minimum number of vaginal deliveries in which a resident must be involved) [13].
Once the problem is identied, the curriculum developer must dene who the problem affects and how. A curriculum may affect a single class of family medicine residents or the entire residency program. Curricular changes that benet a large number of individuals (i.e., learners, faculty, staff, and patients) may be given more attention and have an increased likelihood of stronger support [11].
To clearly understand the problem and how it needs to be addressed, the status quo must be identied. What is cur­rently being done by medical educators, institutions, and society about the problem now? Especially knowing what providers are doing now is important since they are our tar­geted group for curricular changes.
The next thing you might ask is “what are others in family medicine doing?” Looking to other family medicine resi­dency programs both locally and nationally can help you gather more information about the problem and how it might be addressed. Performing a literature search or querying the Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors list­serv offers a good starting point. You may nd that the cur­riculum you are looking to develop already exists in another program. You can study another program’s curriculum and learn how it might be molded into one that can be applied to your specic needs. Perhaps there are several different
options available to address the problem, in which case, they may need to be evaluated and compared to ensure the most applicable approach is being considered for your program [11].
Once you have claried what is currently being done, you will next decide what should ideally be happening. Discovering best practices that involve other specialties or health professionals may help dene the ideal. Referencing new recommendations or requirements of professional soci­eties (including those of other specialty societies) can be helpful in ensuring the curriculum is evidenced based and current with the medical world as a whole. Family medicine residency programs must balance any ACGME requirements and, the expectations of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) for board eligibility with new medical recommendations from the United States Preventive Services Taskforce (USPSTF), American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), American Heart Association (AHA), and any other important professional societies that create clinical practice guidelines. The AAFP and the Society for Teachers of Family Medicine (STFM) are excellent resources that keep their members updated on latest recommendations.
Overall, it is important to remember that the ultimate pur­pose of family medicine residency education is to improve the health of patients, families, and communities [13]. Identifying the health problem that needs to be addressed and dening the desired outcomes will help in the subse­quent steps of curriculum development and continual improvement.
Assess theNeeds
A needs assessment is a systematic process to determine and address the gaps between where you want to be and the sta­tus quo [11]. A needs assessment should be performed dur­ing the initial development of a curricula as well as during the process of continual improvement. A diabetes lecture that has not been updated in the last 5years will be sorely out of date because of new medications on the market. A rotation that requires a resident to work with a super-specialized phy­sician (i.e., lung transplant) may not be meeting the needs of the resident to experience a broad range of pulmonary condi­tions. An effective needs assessment can expose the gap of “what is” and “what should be” and sets the stage for change.
There are four fundamental types of educational needs and clarifying the type of need will help guide curriculum development. A normative need is one in which an individ­ual or group needs to reach an established standard (i.e., passing the ABFM board exam at the end of residency).
13 A Practical Approach to Curriculum Development
125
Anticipated needs are related to projected demands (i.e., the new ACGME requirement of 20 vaginal deliveries in a pro­gram with limited labor and delivery exposure) [13]. A per- ceived need for change is driven by a particular incident or observation. For example, multiple highly televised racially motivated incidents may be the impetus for a program to re­evaluate and update their health equity curriculum. Finally, comparative needs occur when one program has something another does not but wants or needs to include [11]. For example, other programs may have a highly developed point­of-care ultrasound curriculum that another program does not have but would like to create.
Part of the needs assessment involves identifying the tar­get audience. Since we are discussing graduate medical edu­cation in family medicine, we can assume the curriculum being developed will focus on the education of family medi­cine residents.
There are several methods to gather the information required to assess the needs of the target audience. Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages. Since the target audience is resident-learners, the constraints of time and energy for information gathering must be considered.
One method of information gathering is individually focused interviews. These can be structured or unstructured, or a combination of both. Unstructured interviews may occur while working together in clinic or while waiting for a patient to deliver on labor and delivery. The advantages of this method are in its spontaneity and in-the-moment follow-up of interesting responses. Unstructured interviews may con­tain much detail and qualitative information. The disadvan­tages of this method are that it is not systematically conducted and may include interview bias depending on the relation­ship between the interviewer and interviewee. In addition, it may only occur with a small number of individuals and is entirely situational [11].
Structured interviews use consistent questions. Responses can be collated, analyzed, and compared. With both struc­tured and unstructured interviews, it is important for the questioners to maintain a neutral attitude and a structured format may make this easier to attain.
Questionnaires or surveys are another method used to obtain information from the target audience. This method of data collection has many advantages. Information from mul­tiple individuals can be gathered using a structured format without the variance of different individuals performing interviews. Results can be tabulated, analyzed and directly compared with other data. The questionnaires or surveys can be completed anonymously, creating a safer atmosphere in which the individual can feel free to be honest and they can be completed at the individual’s convenience. On the other hand, survey fatigue (the phenomenon an individual feels due to being asked to complete too many surveys, thus being less likely to respond) and time constraints of individuals
may lead to low response rates and partial completion [11]. For surveys targeting health professionals, a response rate of 60% or better should be the goal [14]. Educators can possi­bly avoid the disadvantages, at least partially, in a few ways. Before starting a survey, the individual being asked to com­plete it should be informed of the goal, possibly increasing the likelihood of completion. The curriculum developer should ensure questions are clear and easily answered. Open­ended questions (i.e., free text) may be less likely to be answered completely or robustly. They are more difcult to analyze and, therefore, should be used sparingly. The survey questions need to focus on the curricular objective. Asking the most important questions early in the survey will increase the odds of them being answered. The use of a variety of return options (i.e., email, easy to navigate hyperlinks or tra­ditional mail with stamped self-addressed return envelopes) can increase the likelihood of response [11].
Focus groups are another useful method for establishing the needs for curriculum development. A skilled facilitator can lead a group of people with a common experience to share their collective thoughts.
Example
To assess the needs to revise rotation schedules, indi­viduals from different residency classes along with fac­ulty and program administrators were brought together to share their experiences with the current rotation schedules and suggest ways they could be improved. The group was led by a faculty member specializing in behavioral health who had group facilitation experience. Within a few hours, the group was able to identify rotations that could benet from change or could be discontinued altogether, thereby creating space for new opportunities and to meet updated accreditation requirements for the following aca­demic year.
To be effective, a focus group should be representative of
the various stakeholders but not be large. Five to nine indi­viduals in a focus group are ideal. The facilitator should encourage participation by all, ask open-ended questions and foster brainstorming in a nonjudgmental manner [11].
The steps of curriculum development are cyclical and
uid. Before beginning the targeted needs assessment, the educator should have a general idea of the goals and objec­tives for change. The data collected during the needs assess­ment will affect the subsequent steps of creating specic goals and objectives, developing educational strategies, implementing the curriculum and evaluating outcomes. The needs assessment process can serve as an advertisement for curricular change and engage stakeholders (the residents, faculty and staff). The data collected during the needs assess­ment will not only be helpful in guiding the upcoming pro­cess of developing and implementing the curriculum; it is
126
B. D. Panchal and E. Bruce
also important for dissemination of the learnings (such as presentations at national conferences) to other educators with similar needs and learners. Performing a thorough gen­eral and targeted needs assessment can result in the educator becoming a content expert and provide a solid foundation for the next step, developing goals and objectives.
Goals andObjectives
The ACGME states that every residency program must develop “competency-based goals and objectives for each educational experience designed to promote progress on a trajectory to autonomous practice” [13]. Keeping this in mind will help in the development of each goal and objective for any curricular element within the residency program. Once the needs are identied, well-written goals and objec­tives will help determine the curricular content. Educational strategies and teaching methods can be developed to meet the needs of the resident-physicians based upon them.
Goals dene the end to which a curriculum is directed and are important because they communicate the overall aim or purpose of the curriculum. In family medicine education, autonomous practice upon completion of residency is a goal. For example, by the end of residency, we aim for our resi­dents to be able to care for the acute and chronic medical problems of adults and children, deliver a baby, repair a lac­eration, and explain preventive health recommendations autonomously without supervision. Objectives offer specic guidance in the development of effective educational meth­ods to reach these goals and set the stage for evaluation of the educational experience [11].
There can be confusion when identifying the difference between a goal and an objective. For the purposes of resi­dency education, a goal indicates a broad curricular aim whereas an objective is a specic and measurable curricular component. Goals are usually established based on a longer time frame than objectives. In family medicine education, 3 years is a frequently used time frame to set a goal. Objectives are based on shorter time frames, such as the end of a rotation or the end of a postgraduate year. Though both goals and objectives dene outcomes, goals do not dene the specic methods used to get to the outcome. Objectives describe specic measurable actions to be taken or tasks to be completed to reach the goal. Goals dene the destination; objectives explain the roadmap.
Goals
Goal oriented statements should be made in terms of overall learner outcomes and be realistically attainable by the com-
pletion of the residency program. The goals should align
with the program’s overall mission and aims. They should be stated in terms of learner knowledge, behavior and attitudes and describe real world behaviors to be used by the learner. For example, the stated goals of a longitudinal maternity care curriculum could include the following:
Upon completion of residency, the family medicine graduate
will independently:
• Perform a thorough medical and psychosocial obstetri­cal history.
• Provide comprehensive preconception counseling and care to patients who desire to become pregnant.
• Manage the uncomplicated pregnant patient through outpatient prenatal care.
• Competently manage a normal, uncomplicated labor and perform a vaginal delivery.
• Provide comprehensive postpartum care for the uncomplicated patient.
The goals of the curriculum are broad and specify what the program wishes for the resident to “know,” or perform independently by the time they graduate from the program. The objectives will help guide the specic curriculum com­ponents to reach these goals.
Objectives
Writing curricular objectives is a skill that is important for family medicine educators to develop but is often over­looked. Badly written objectives can cause a curriculum to be poorly implemented, unfocused and open to various inter­pretations. It is crucial that the educator take time to thought­fully and meticulously write objectives that relate to the goals of the curriculum. When writing objectives, the family physician educator should answer the question, “What will the learners be able to do by the end of this particular cur­ricular experience?”
Objective statements should be specic and measurable and answer ve basic elements: 1. Who? 2. Will do? 3. How much? 4. Of what? 5. By when? [11]. Use of the SMART (Specic, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timebound) acronym is very useful here [15]. The objectives should iden­tify exactly what is expected to be achieved and who will achieve it. The objectives should express the expected change and how it will be measured (i.e., rotation evaluations, in­training service examination scores, etc.). It is important for the objective to be achievable and attainable by the end of the stated time frame. For example, it may be unreasonable to expect a PGY1 resident to independently perform a special­ized procedure without the support of a senior resident or attending physician by the end of their rst year of residency,
13 A Practical Approach to Curriculum Development
127
but it may be a reasonable goal upon completion of residency. Finally, the objectives should be timebound and specify when they should be achieved (i.e., upon completion of a workshop, at the end of the rotation, by the end of PGY1, etc.) [11].
The use of focused action verbs helps to minimize misin­terpretation of the objective. Bloom’s taxonomy (Table13.1) consists of six levels of progressively more complicated cog­nitive abilities. Educators have been relying on this taxonomy since Benjamin Bloom PhD and his associates identied the levels and specic associated action verbs in 1956 [16]. Bloom identied and classied increasingly complex cognitive pro­cessing skills at each level. Knowledge is the most basic cog­nitive level and refers to gathering and obtaining discrete pieces of information. Higher levels of cognitive processing include comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. As a family medicine resident progresses from an undifferentiated medical student into a competently trained independently practicing graduate, they will develop an increasing ability to apply higher level cognitive processing skills. The curriculum objectives should reect this expected progression. Table13.1 provides a visual aid and examples of appropriate action verbs to use in writing useful objectives.
The following are examples of written objectives:
By the end of the rst year of inpatient rotations, the PGY1
resident will be able to:
• Explain the management of common inpatient condi­tions including CHF, sepsis, COPD, DKA, and osteomyelitis.
• Complete a patient admission in less than 2.5 hours that includes collecting a thorough history, performing a physical examination, and conducting a medication reconciliation.
• Coordinate the care and management of a family medi­cine inpatient census of 10–12 patients.
At the end of the colposcopy workshop, residents will be
able to:
• Identify reasons a patient may require a colposcopy.
• Recognize the parts of a colposcope and how to manip-
ulate the equipment.
• Demonstrate the steps required for a satisfactory col-
poscopy examination.
The goals and objectives for a family medicine residency
curriculum should be written with the six ACGME competen­cies and the individual specialty’s milestones in mind. Specically linking the goals and objectives with one or more of the six competencies (Patient Care, Medical Knowledge, Professionalism, Interpersonal and Communication Skills, Practice-based Learning and Improvement, and Systems­based Practice) is helpful [17]. Additionally, the milestones were developed to provide educators and learners markers in performance and a road to mastery for the resident. Each level marks the journey of the resident-physician from novice to advanced beginner to competency to prociency and eventu­ally to mastery. The resident learner should move from novice (beginning of residency) to competence and prociency by the time they graduate. Mastery is a reach goal that may not be obtained for several years out of residency training. Each objective should fall under one or more of the six competen­cies and link to a milestone. For example, the PGY1 inpatient medicine objective cited above links to the Patient Care and Medical Knowledge competencies. More specically, the objective links to the FM Milestones PC-1 (Care of the Acutely Ill Patient) and MK-1 (Demonstrates Medical
Table 13.1 Bloom’s taxonomy: examples of action verbs grouped by cognitive processing level
Complexity level Cognitive level Illustrative verbs Low Knowledge
Comprehension Classify, convert, defend, discuss, distinguish, estimate, explain, express, extend, generalize, give
Application Apply, change, choose, compute, demonstrate, discover, dramatize, employ, illustrate, interpret,
Analysis Analyze, appraise, breakdown, calculate, categorize, classify, compare, contrast, criticize, derive,
High Synthesis Arrange, assemble, categorize, collect, combine, comply, compose, construct, create, design, develop,
Evaluation Appraise, argue, assess, attach, choose, compare, conclude, contrast, defend, describe, discriminate,
Arrange, dene, describe, duplicate, identify, label, list, match, memorize, name, order, outline, recognize, relate, recall, repeat, reproduce, select, state
example(s), identify, indicate, infer, locate, paraphrase, predict, recognize, rewrite, report, restate, review, select, summarize, translate
manipulate, modify, operate, practice, predict, prepare, produce, relate, schedule, show, sketch, solve, use, write
diagram, differentiate, discriminate, distinguish, examine, experiment, identify, illustrate, infer, interpret, model, outline, point out, question, relate, select, separate, subdivide, test
devise, explain, formulate, generate, plan, prepare, propose, rearrange, reconstruct, relate, reorganize, revise, rewrite, set up, summarize, synthesize, tell, write
estimate, evaluate, explain, judge, justify, interpret, relate, predict, rate, select, summarize, support, value
128
B. D. Panchal and E. Bruce
Knowledge of Sufcient Breadth and Depth to Practice Family Medicine) [17].
Competency based education is not unique to medical edu­cation and was rst used in the 1960s [18]. Competency based education is learner focused and aims to ensure the resident reaches the written objectives. A resident may need to spend additional time on a rotation or receive focused instruction in a specic topic area in order to meet a specic objective before being allowed to progress in the program [19].
Developing clear well-written learner-based objectives is important and effects the overall process of curriculum development. Spending adequate time in writing them is cru­cial. However, they are still just one step in the process. Next, we will discuss different educational strategies that can be used for delivering the curriculum.

Educational Strategies

Once the goals and objectives are written, the educational strategies for the curriculum must be determined. Strategies refer to both educational content and method of delivery of that content. The ACGME Review Committee (RC) requires that the “curriculum must be structured to optimize resident educational experiences, the length of the experiences, and the supervisory continuity. These educational experiences include an appropriate blend of supervised patient care responsibilities, clinical teaching, and didactic educational events” [13]. When considering the method by which a cur­riculum will be taught, there are three basic categories within family medicine residency education to consider: block rota­tion, longitudinal and didactic. Some aspects of the curricu­lum may be best taught and learned through one of these categories (i.e., didactic teaching for dental health; longitudi­nal teaching in the outpatient residency ofce practice for continuity of care experiences) and some can be learned using all three categories (i.e., care of children, health equity). Though the main goal of a resident is to learn, they are also responsible for many aspects of patient care in the hospital and in the outpatient setting. Educators must acknowledge this and incorporate the patient care responsi­bilities into the learning objectives.
Block rotation curriculum objectives outline what a resi­dent should learn during an experience within a limited time frame. For example, many residency programs use block rotations that are each 4-week long with 13 blocks per aca­demic year, each of which can be a unique experience. A resident will work on many different rotations during their residency training. They will work in various areas of the hospital and in outpatient settings and within different spe­cialties. Logistically, the educator who is planning a block rotation curriculum will need to consider not just the subject area to be taught, but also who will be teaching it, how it will be taught and where it will occur.
If a resident is going to perform a rotational experience outside the home institution, it is important to consider that a Program Learning Agreement (PLA) is necessary. This is a legal agreement between the sponsoring institution and the institution at which the resident will be working. Specically, the PLA identies the individuals responsible for education, supervision and evaluation of the resident, the content and duration of the educational experience and the policies and procedures that govern the educational experience. The PLA ensures the sponsoring institution that the resident is receiv­ing the education expected, is being supported appropriately and helps to cover the resident if any medicolegal concerns should arise.
The ACGME lays out specic requirements that a family medicine resident must meet to graduate.
Example
The most recent requirements (2023), state that the “resident
must have 200hours (or 2months) of experience dedi-
cated to the care of children in the ambulatory setting, to
include well, acute, and chronic care for infants, pre-
school aged children, school-aged children and adoles-
cents” [13]. To satisfy this, a family medicine program in
a large metropolitan city partnered with the local chil-
dren’s hospital and their large outpatient care network to
allow PGY2 and PGY3 family medicine residents to
rotate in their ambulatory clinics, thus receiving dedicated
education about the care of children from pediatric spe-
cialists.
This is one of many examples of required experiences that are probably best satised by developing a block rotation curriculum in a specic area of medicine.
Longitudinal curriculum encompasses requirements for knowledge that cannot or should not be done within a set time period. For example, the teaching of practice manage­ment might be best accomplished over the entire length of the residency experience, so the individual can build upon their knowledge and continuously implement it in multiple venues such as the hospital, skilled nursing facility and outpatient continuity practice. The longitudinal education that occurs in the family medicine residency center is another example and should have its own set of goals of objectives. The Family Medicine Review Committee acknowledges that longitudinal education is crucial to the education of a resident to ensure they are progressively able to competently perform with progressively less supervision.
Didactic curriculum is structured learning that is typi­cally offered in small doses such as 30-minute presentations (i.e., at noon conferences or morning report) or with online modules. Didactic teaching can be used for teaching about subjects that the resident may be exposed to infrequently
13 A Practical Approach to Curriculum Development
129
(i.e., care for on-eld sports emergencies or disaster pre­paredness), for workshops during which a resident can prac­tice procedural skills in a controlled simulated environment, for an introduction to new therapies (e.g., monoclonal anti­bodies) or for an overview of treatment options (e.g., diabe­tes medications). Adult learners learn best when exposed to a subject using multiple teaching modalities [8].
As discussed previously, the needs of adult learners have changed over the years. The lecture format still has rele­vance but might be used in smaller doses and with less fre­quency than 20 years ago. The modalities for didactic education are expanding and limited only by the imagina­tion of the educator. More recently, online modules and gaming have expanded the toolkit of educational experi­ences beyond what anyone could have imagined 100years ago. Articial intelligence may offer many additional oppor­tunities. Referring back to the curricular objectives will help in deciding which educational teaching methods will be best. Higher order cognitive objectives may be best addressed by one teaching method compared to lower order cognitive objectives which may lend themselves to another teaching modality. For example, new content can be pre­sented using lower cognitive level teaching methods such as textbooks, lectures or audio/video resources. Higher order cognitive objectives might better lend themselves to group discussions, problem-based learning, or supervised clinical experiences.
Interestingly, an overreliance on goal-directed learning may be counter-productive. Goal-directed learning is inten­tional and, oftentimes, directed toward acquiring dened cognitive knowledge. But goal-directed learning may imbue constraints on thought processes such as problem-solving, brainstorming, and thinking intensely about a specic and limited task or problem at hand. Though goal-directed learn­ing is important to ensure the curricular goals and objectives are being met, learners also require time to allow their minds to wander and rest. During these restful and wandering times, research has shown that learning continues and allows inno­vative and creative thoughts to develop [20].
Occasionally, a learner may require additional time to achieve the objectives of the curriculum. As goals and objectives are created, the educator must consider neurodi­vergent resident-learners who do not reach the set goals and objectives in the time allotted. On the other hand, if a sig­nicant portion of the learners are not meeting the set objectives, the educator should ask if the curriculum is part of the problem and whether the objectives or teaching modalities should be re-evaluated. It is important to remem­ber that in residency education, it is imperative that objec­tives are met as patient care can be greatly affected. Often, there are complex reasons that a learner may not be meet­ing objectives and it is the duty of the program faculty to uncover the barriers and ensure the residents have support
in managing them in order to effectively meet the curricu­lum objectives [11]. There is growing evidence that know­ing why a learner is not meeting objectives can help in guiding remediation strategies [21]. However, some com­petencies are more difcult to remediate than others. For example, remediating a problem with a resident’s profes­sionalism is a much different process than remediating a medical knowledge decit. Ultimately, some residents may not be able to meet the established objectives and each pro­gram must decide the signicance of the patient care and public safety consequences in these cases.

Implementation

The nal step in the development of a curriculum is imple­mentation. This may take place at the same time as the needs assessment if there is a problem that needs to be addressed immediately. Or implementation may be projected to start in the future after completion of the rst four curriculum devel­opment steps, depending on the cycle of the curriculum or timing of the academic year for the residency program.
Example
A dermatology rotation is losing one of its main fac­ulty members with whom residents work regularly. You’ve been given 3months’ notice to implement a change in the block rotation experience. At the same time, you’ve noted that the rotation goals and objectives have not been updated for 5years. During this time of curriculum revi­sion, you will need to go through all the steps for curricu­lum development simultaneously so as not to interrupt the residents’ scheduled educational experience.
Example
A residency program is developing a new Point-of­Care Ultrasound curriculum which will include work­shops and bedside experiences. Since this is not currently part of the active curriculum, the program may wait until the beginning of the next academic year to implement the curriculum into the new rotation schedule to avoid inter­ruption of the current schedules.
Before making the curriculum a reality, the educator
must ensure resources are available and stakeholders are in agreement and ready to initiate the experiences associ­ated with the proposed curriculum [11]. As the educator follows the steps of curriculum development, they must keep in mind the goal of implementation. For implemen­tation to occur, several items must be identied and solidi­ed including: identifying and securing resources, obtaining stakeholder support, ensuring administrative