Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2725_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
31 Мб
Скачать
30 Teaching Behavioral Science
341
of IBH), and whether IBH development is coming from an heirloom recipe or starting from scratch.
Depending on the variables above, programs can create an IBH model that is aligned with one or more of the con­cepts below.
Integrated Care Model
• A team-based approach, whereby team members work
together to provide comprehensive care. This team may
include primary care physicians and/or Advanced Practice
Providers (APP), behavioral health specialists (e.g., psy-
chologists, social workers, or graduate students in psy-
chological training programs), pharmacists, psychiatrists,
and care managers.
• Care Coordination: There is close coordination and
communication (in-person and/or via shared electronic
medical record) among team members to ensure that
patients receive the right interventions and support. The
team may develop treatment protocols and algorithms to
determine roles for screening, assessment, and
intervention.
• Treatment Plans: Patients receive personalized treatment
plans that address both their physical and behavioral
health needs. This often includes evidence-based treat-
ments for mental health conditions like depression and
anxiety. Treatment plans are shared among interdisciplin-
ary team members.
• Measurement-Based Care: Regular assessments and mea-
surement of patient progress help guide treatment deci-
sions and adjustments.
Collaborative Care Model (CoCM)
• A patient-centered model of team-based care that engages
the PCP or APP as the cornerstone of the care team with
care management staff to provide brief behavioral inter-
ventions and a psychiatric provider as a consultant.
• In addition to regular assessment of patient progress, this
model also tracks time spent by each team member
monthly.
• Using time-based tracking and billing codes, the CoCM
payment model allows for billing through medical bene-
ts with Medicare and Medicaid, potentially ameliorating
nancial barriers for both clinics and patients in the provi-
sion of behavioral health services.
• Patient registries are utilized for population health
management.
Co-located Care/Behavioral Health Consultation
• Behavioral health consultants (BHCs), often psycholo-
gists or social workers, are embedded in primary care
clinics and receive referrals from primary care clinicians.
They work with primary care providers to offer timely
assessments and interventions for patients with behav-
ioral health concerns.
• BHCs provide brief, focused interventions that may include counseling, psychoeducation, and recommenda­tions for further care if needed.
• Psychiatrists also may be available through an intermit­tent specialty consult clinic in the primary care setting or available for virtual consultations for diagnosis assistance or medication management. Assess resources in the orga­nization and the community to determine if such consul­tation services may be available or feasible.
• Care coordination: Co-location enhances informal com­munication opportunities between clinicians about shared patients.
• Treatment Plans: Clinicians share treatment plans and progress with referring physicians but may not share health records/patient charts.
Coordinated Care
• The primary care ofce conducts routine behavioral health screening and utilizes an established referral rela­tionship with one or more external behavioral health cli­nicians or organizations to provide care for a patient’s mental health needs.
• Mental health services are provided in a location other than the primary care clinic.
• Care coordination: The primary care organization and the mental health organization likely do not share medical records or patient charts. However, there is a routine exchange of information between settings to ensure cohesive care. The communication may be facilitated by a care manager.
Other issues to consider when implementing IBH and
training family medicine residents in its utilization:
Routine Screening and Assessment. Primary care practices
routinely screen patients for behavioral health issues, such as depression, anxiety, and substance use disorders during regular check-ups. Screening may be performed by a clini­cal staff member or a physician. Forms may also be pro­vided for patients to complete upon check-in or as part of the rooming process. Various assessment tools and ques­tionnaires are used to identify patients at risk or those expe­riencing behavioral health issues. Results of assessments guide physicians in their treatment planning, to manage in primary care or refer out to behavioral health services.
Care Management. Care managers or care coordinators
help patients navigate the healthcare system, schedule appointments, and connect them to appropriate resources and support. Patients are often educated about the con­nection between physical and mental health, helping them understand the importance of integrated care. They may have training in social work or health coaching. As health coaches do not require graduate level professional training, but do receive specialized training in goal set­ting, motivational interviewing and health behavior change, it may be cost efcient to utilize their services.
342
A. Bickett et al.
Telehealth and Technology. Telehealth services have become
increasingly important in integrated care models, allowing patients to access behavioral health services remotely when needed. Services may include medication manage-
Provider Self-Awareness andReective Practice
ment with a psychiatrist, ongoing psychotherapy with a behavioral health clinician, self-guided virtual evidence­informed interventions such as cognitive behavior therapy, and interventions from care management or social work.
Source: By the author Linda Myerholtz, PhD
Considering the breadth of information and practice required to integrate all the aforementioned curricula into a 3- or 4-year residency experience, additional teaching about pro­vider self-awareness and reective practice may feel over­whelming. Fortunately, the ingredients for a curriculum around personal development are the same that adult learners require for engaging productively in the family medicine curriculum. Family medicine into a program with a variety of skills and resiliency that will create natural opportunities to promote professional development, personal develop­ment, and self-care. Although considerable variability will exist within any program or any class of residents, family medicine residents want to succeed, want to grow, and pos­sess well-developed self-awareness.
ACGME requirements clarify the commitment to physi­cian self-awareness and reective practice within the profes­sionalism domain and within the subsections dedicated to
practice-based learning and improvement. Further commit­ment to self-awareness and personal development is reected in the statement on physician wellness which highlights shared responsibility to support thriving physicians. Physician self-awareness and reective practice are inte­grated into the AAFP behavioral health curriculum guide­lines and explicitly described in the full developmental context in the ACGME milestones connected with Practice Based Learning and Improvement (PBLI).
Competencies connected with professionalism and ethics require content education and a commitment to self­awareness in broad strokes. Within the domain of profes­sionalism (see Fig. 30.5), physicians-in-training develop self-awareness and reective practice, vital components of a family physician’s professional journey. They enhance a family physician’s ability to better understand their own biases, values, and emotions that can inuence patient inter-
30 Teaching Behavioral Science
343
actions. This awareness enables them to provide more patient-centered care, adapting their approach to align with the needs and preferences of diverse patients. This can, in turn, cultivate a deeper sense of empathy for the patient experience.
Physicians must be aware of how personal bias affects care for patients. Licensing boards often require specic cur­riculum addressing implicit bias, even when employers may not. In any case, awareness of the roots of implicit bias and specic strategies that physicians can use to mitigate bias in their care will be central to efforts to create a more equitable health system. Behavioral Health Curriculum in family med­icine training provides many opportunities to offer implicit bias curriculum and to address health inequities.
Requirements for PBLI further elaborate on important content related to self-awareness and reective practice, including appropriate goal setting, awareness of personal competencies and decits, and identication of appropriate learning activities. These requirements outline learning goals directed toward physicians’ leadership in practice and health systems. This connects with the mission to create Master Adaptive Learners (see below for description) who adjust and adapt based on the ongoing feedback they receive from the environment in which they practice and learn. Family medicine milestones describe the aspirational developmental trajectory of physicians who are skilled in self-reection and committed to personal and professional growth.
Engaging in reective practice allows physicians to review and evaluate their clinical decisions, identifying pat­terns of success, and areas of concern. This iterative process enhances their critical thinking skills and leads to more informed and evidence-based medical choices. Self­awareness helps family physicians recognize signs of burn­out, compassion fatigue, and other psychological challenges. By reecting on emotions and stress triggers, they can take proactive steps to manage their well-being. Likewise, reec­tive practice improves physician’s abilities to collaborate and communicate with other healthcare professionals. By under­standing their own strengths and areas for growth, they can contribute more effectively to team-based patient care.
The ultimate goal of family medicine training is to facili­tate the development of family physicians who are well­rounded, self-aware leaders, with a good fund of medical knowledge and a high degree of cultural humility. In outlin­ing the necessary ingredients for a curriculum that engages residents’ personal and clinical growth, we are aware of the signicant variability in our residency programs, learning environments, personnel, and communities that require us to adjust and accommodate the curriculum. Each program is working with different ingredients, in different kitchens, with different measuring spoons and kitchen tools. The pre­vious section provided details on the ingredients for the BH curriculum. The next section will describe methods of pre­paring and using these ingredients.
Crafting Behavioral Health Educational Experiences: Teaching Methods andStrategies
Much of adult learning, particularly during residency edu­cation, comes from a combination of experiential learning and reection [61]. The cognitive apprenticeship model [62] and other adult learning theories can help frame our role during teaching encounters through content curation, engaging teaching strategies, and the facilitation of reec­tive experiences throughout the learning process. Effective teachers will help learners orient themselves to the activity, identify explicit learning objectives, and anticipate impor­tant elements of the experience (pre-brief) [63]. Both intended and unintended learning happens during experien­tial learning (which could be anything from a team-based learning activity, clinical encounters, patient simulation, resident-faculty retreat, or role play during didactics as examples). Facilitators then hold space for learners to debrief and reect on their experience, often returning to learning objectives to facilitate a deeper connection to the material.
Just as a chef might employ a fusion of cuisines or cook­ing methods to create a cohesive dish, the program should consider using a combination of teaching methods and strat­egies. Educational approaches might include principles of Master Adaptive Learner, Behavioral Health/Science Rotations and Electives, clinic-based learning, didactics/ classroom-based learning, interprofessional education, video review/patient simulation, and personal development and self-care.
Master Adaptive Learner
Likely, BH training will occur in a variety of settings, using a variety of methods. Depending on the context, it may be helpful to keep the Master Adaptive Learner (MAL) approach in mind. The MAL framework encourages self-reection and self-directed learning in an iterative process similar to a PDSA cycle. In the clinic, faculty may contribute to the learner’s self-assessment by providing feedback on an observed skill and then facilitating learning through questioning or thinking aloud [64]. Putting MAL into action, BH faculty may ask residents to reect and identify the com­munication skills to be enhanced prior to an observed clinic. Feedback could be provided and implemented in real-time, with the resident leading how it is to be implemented. Alternatively, the resident could describe their approach to a visit that was recorded and then share how they might approach it differently with input from BH faculty. Because MAL requires continual reection and self-assessment, it adapts to the residents’ level of learning, always identifying the next step of something to learn [65].
344
A. Bickett et al.
Behavioral Health/Science Rotations andElectives
Many residencies have a curriculum that is built around block rotations, weeks, or months during residency training that focus on a particular learning environment/clinical care context such as inpatient care, pediatric outpatient care, and obstetrical care. Some programs also have a rotation that focuses on behavioral medicine/science/health care. These terms are interchangeable and will subsequently be referred to as a BH rotation or BH elective in this chapter.
The new ACGME program requirements state that resi­dents must have a “dedicated experience” in the diagnosis and management of common mental illnesses and that this needs to include IBH in the primary care clinic, but they do not specify that programs must have a specic BH rotation or how long this experience should be. While BH learning should be integrated throughout all clinical training experi­ences during residency rather than articially siloing BH as a separate aspect of healthcare, a BH rotation does allow for an immersed concentrated experience in a variety of behav­ioral health/mental health learning environments.
The experiences included in a BH rotation will depend on the learning goals for the rotation and on connections the residency program has within the larger health care system and the community. Thus, a BH rotation could look quite different across residency programs. There is considerable opportunity for creativity in crafting learning experiences for the residents. Inpatient psychiatric settings can offer easier access to participating in care as there tends to be less empha­sis on continuity of behavioral health care. Likewise, psychi­atric consultation services in healthcare systems can provide rich learning and opportunities to practice assessment skills and consultation.
Referring back to the metaphor of behavioral science as a culinary experience, you’ll want to check your pantry for what is available to you. Whether your residency exists in a community clinic or an academic institution, you may wish to explore interdepartmental or inter-organizational collabo­rations. Educational partnerships frequently exist between family medicine residencies and psychiatry, pediatrics, OB/ GYN, and community organizations. For opportunities to practice behavior change counseling skills, one could look for individuals in the community or partnerships with orga­nizations who specialize in substance use treatment pro­grams, tobacco cessation/moderation programs, behavioral weight management programs, and other harm reduction programs. In conjunction with, or in the absence of, such col­laborations programs may wish to develop self-directed learning opportunities for residents to explore various behav­ioral health topics at their own pace. For example, a rotation schedule may include 2–4 self-directed learning half-days, whereby the resident is provided with a list of articles, resources, videos, and online modules to further their under­standing of mental health assessment and treatment topics.
These self-directed learning times and topics can be further tailored to the resident’s desired learning style and interests at the beginning of the rotation.
To help residents learn about crisis management, a resi­dency could include experiences with a mental health crisis center or crisis hotline. Having residents rotate with a local ACT team (Assertive Community Treatment) or a rehabilita­tion clubhouse program would broaden training for working with interdisciplinary teams serving individuals with serious and persistent mental illness. Consider incorporating poverty simulations and shelter health opportunities to provide tan­gible representations of psychosocial and community connections.
In addition, a BH rotation might offer experience in dif­ferent models of IBH such as psychiatric collaborative care models, primary care behavioral health, and reverse co­located models of care.
Given that BH is foundational to primary health care and behavior change counseling skills are critical for residents to learn, having the BH rotation in the intern or second year may be ideal. With the recent expansion of time for elective rotations during the 3years of residency (3–6months), there is also an enhanced opportunity to craft elective BH rotations to enhance learning for second and third-year residents. These elective rotations could focus in more depth on par­ticular populations such as child and adolescent mental health or substance use treatment. For examples of BH Rotations please see Appendixes 1 and 2.
Clinic-Based Learning
Faculty responsible for BH training may want to consider the sites where residents engage in patient care (ambula­tory, inpatient, OB, etc.) and identify partners for incorpo­rating BH topics into those sites, or tie cases from other sites into BH didactics at the family medicine residency site. For example, discussions on how to perform a trauma­informed well-woman exam or the importance of screening for interpersonal violence and depression at a postpartum visit could be covered as part of an OB/GYN rotation or in the family medicine practice. When at the family medicine site, BH principles can be strengthened through precepting, curbside consults, observation, and engaging in collabora­tive or integrated care models (covered in a subsequent sec­tion). Behavioral co-precepting occurs with family physicians and BH provider faculty and aims to reinforce residents’ skills in psychosocial assessment, medication management, and behavioral interventions. Innovations to this approach have utilized telehealth modalities [66]. BH preceptors may want to be aware of how much information they convey and utilize principles of microlearning, which emphasizes self-directed learning in small units that build upon each other and are applied quickly (focused, “just-in­time training”) [67].
30 Teaching Behavioral Science
345
Indeed, though some principles of effective patient­centered communication can be conveyed through work­shops, developing strong communication skills must include observations with coaching. Henry and colleagues [68] pro­pose that communication skills training should be conducted like training in procedures, with observed practice and feed­back. This could take place with standardized patients, role plays with faculty or peers, and video reviews or direct observations of patient care [69]. Having a structured pro­cess to review patient encounters that includes clear identi­cation of communication skills to be bolstered, ways to improve, and strengths can improve resident satisfaction with the process [70].
Many programs use a standardized format to provide feedback on communication skills, such as the Patient­Centered Observation Form (PCOF). The PCOF provides linkages to family medicine milestones, aiding in both for­mative feedback and competency assessment [7173].
Classroom-Based Learning
BH faculty should have an active role in directing the topics scheduled for didactics. They may want to teach certain core topics annually (e.g., basics of managing depression and anxiety, communication skills workshops) and include other topics in a rotating fashion on an 18-month schedule (e.g., eating disorders).
Active learning strategies should be the primary modality of instruction. Though some may require more time to pre­pare or up-front investment to master the teaching style, they result in greater engagement and retention as compared to lecture-based formats. One example of this format is the ipped classroom, in which residents are assigned pre-work to identify their learning goals and prepare them to be active participants in the classroom-based instruction. Residents co-create the learning experience by asking questions and reecting on their experiences or sharing their knowledge. The faculty acts as a guide in the residents’ learning and must be prepared to address multiple goals or competencies, as opposed to directing all of the content that is shared with the learners [74]. Other chapters in this book provide more in-depth descriptions of active learning strategies.
Video Review andSimulation-Based Learning
Video review (VR) is commonly used in family medicine residency training as a valuable educational tool that can help residents develop their clinical skills, enhance their knowl­edge, and improve their patient care. Programs vary in the number of recorded patient encounters they require for resi­dents each year, with some choosing to increase the frequency of video reviews for residents experiencing difculty or limi­tations in clinical interviewing or medical knowledge.
The process is also highly variable, depending on video equipment and administrative support for the experience. When implementing video review in family medicine resi­dency training, it is important to ensure patient privacy and condentiality by obtaining informed consent from the patient and following ethical and legal standards, including the use of HIPAA-compliant equipment. Additionally, creat­ing a supportive and nonjudgmental learning environment is crucial to encourage residents to actively engage in the review process and seek continuous improvement in their clinical skills and patient care. Because video review pro­cesses can invoke anxiety in learners and faculty alike, fac­ulty should provide a thorough explanation of the purpose and expectations for the activity, so as to lessen discomfort and improve learner safety (e.g., Video Review | Family Practice Residency Program (ubc.ca)). As noted previously, the Patient Centered Observation Form (PCOF) is often used to guide feedback sessions [73].
Faculty can request that residents present recorded cases during didactic sessions or in small-group discussions. Reviewing these cases allows residents to receive feedback from attending physicians and fellow residents, helping them rene their assessment, interviewing, clinical decision­making, and treatment planning skills, as well as the struc­ture and ow of their ofce visit. Facilitating the process of peer feedback can provide a unique perspective to the evalu­ation, sharpen interprofessional communication skills, and foster a collaborative learning environment. The video review feedback session may alternatively be held with one or two faculty members (i.e., one attending physician and one behavioral medicine faculty), without other residents present.
Simulation-based medical education (SBME) experi­ences can also serve as mechanisms for training and evaluation in the family medicine curriculum. This learning environment provides residents with an opportunity to prac­tice clinical skills and gain experience with challenging clin­ical scenarios in a controlled and safe environment [75, 76] and allows for the tailoring of clinical scenarios to the devel­opmental level of the learner [77].
The content and frequency of simulation-based learning will vary by program, depending on availability of SBME resources and nancial feasibility of engaging in this type of learning platform. A 2019 survey of Program Directors across a diverse sample of family medicine residency training pro­grams indicated the majority of programs utilized simulation as an educational tool for education and assessment of clini­cal skills and medical knowledge competencies [78].
Before the encounter, residents and faculty set specic learning objectives and goals for the simulation. These objectives can vary widely and may include tasks such as taking a patient history, conducting a physical examination, making a diagnosis, formulating a treatment plan, and effec­tively communicating with patients and their families. Faculty or simulation experts create realistic patient scenar-
346
A. Bickett et al.
ios that mimic common or challenging clinical situations encountered in family medicine. Scenarios can range from routine primary care visits to complex cases like managing chronic illnesses or addressing end-of-life care issues. Simulated encounters can also be used for interdisciplinary training, allowing residents to work with other healthcare professionals, such as nurses, pharmacists, or social workers, in a team-based approach to patient care.
Family medicine residency programs often have dedicated simulation facilities equipped with examination rooms, medi­cal equipment, and audio-visual recording capabilities. These facilities mimic real clinical settings as closely as possible. Trained actors or standardized patients (SPs) are used to por­tray the role of patients or family members. SPs are coached to provide consistent and realistic responses to residents’ ques­tions and actions during the encounter. Residents participate in scheduled simulation sessions, either individually or in small groups. In some training scenarios, residents take turns inter­acting with the simulated patient while others observe and subsequently provide feedback. Faculty members may also observe remotely or from behind one-way mirrors.
Interprofessional Education
Given the new emphasis in ACGME requirements on inter­professional learning, it is important to consider how to effectively implement interprofessional education (IPE). Prior to this update, many family medicine educators recog­nized the need for specic training in interprofessional prac­tice, including dening who is on the team, understanding scopes of practice, communicating effectively with other professionals (e.g., developing a shared language, conict resolution), and overcoming siloed care to work as a team. [79, 80] Further, the Interprofessional Education Collaborative has outlined core competencies for interpro­fessional collaborative practice [81]. The ability to provide interprofessional care can enhance patient safety and quality, as well as provider satisfaction [82].
Successful implementation of IPE in the clinic or class­room will follow certain principles. In family medicine, interprofessional team members may include nursing, phar­macy, social work, behavioral health, and other medical pro­fessionals. The learning environment must be supportive of each individual and clearly model respect and value for each profession [83]. In the clinic setting, ensuring availability of team members, role clarication, open communication, and shared decision making enhances the relationship building that is vital to interprofessional practice [84]. Thus, these behaviors must be modeled in the clinic. Other strategies to teach collaborative BH care in the clinic may include hud­dles, warm handoffs, shadowing, and co-counseling [85]. An interprofessional approach also could be taken with provid­ing feedback on direct observations of patient care to demon­strate patient-centered communication skills to multiple types of learners [86]. In the classroom, learners from differ-
ent professions may be grouped together for team-based learning, with an invitation to each to participate in the dis­cussion. For example, each could be asked to describe how they would contribute to the care of a person with uncon­trolled diabetes with multiple psychosocial barriers to adher­ing to their treatment plan. Ideally, facilitators representing the different professions will be present to help guide activi­ties [87].
Regardless of the IBH model utilized by a program, there are several competencies in interprofessional collaboration to be addressed in a family medicine training curriculum [81].
Competency 1: Work with individuals of other professions to
maintain a climate of mutual respect and shared values.
(Values/Ethics for Interprofessional Practice). Competency 2: Use the knowledge of one’s own role and
those of other professions to appropriately assess and
address the health care needs of patients and to promote
and advance the health of populations. (Roles/
Responsibilities). Competency 3: Communicate with patients, families, com-
munities, and professionals in health and other elds in a
responsive and responsible manner that supports a team
approach to the promotion and maintenance of health and
the prevention and treatment of disease. (Interprofessional
Communication). Competency 4: Apply relationship-building values and the
principles of team dynamics to perform effectively in dif-
ferent team roles to plan, deliver, and evaluate patient/
population-centered care and population health programs
and policies that are safe, timely, efcient, effective, and
equitable (Teams and Teamwork).
Personal Development andSelf-Care
It is with great clarity that the ACGME milestones focus on recommendations for self-awareness and well-being, quoted here [14]:
Psychological, emotional, and physical well-being are critical in
the development of the competent, caring, and resilient physi-
cian and require proactive attention to life inside and outside of
medicine. Well-being requires that physicians retain the joy in
medicine while managing their own real-life stresses. Self-care
and responsibility to support other members of the health care
team are important components of professionalism; they are also
skills that must be modeled, learned, and nurtured in the context
of other aspects of residency training.
Residents and faculty members are at risk for burnout and
depression. Programs, in partnership with their Sponsoring
Institutions, have the same responsibility to address well-being
as other aspects of resident competence. Physicians and all
members of the health care team share responsibility for the
well-being of each other. A positive culture in a clinical learning
environment models constructive behaviors, and prepares resi-
dents with the skills and attitudes needed to thrive throughout
their careers.
30 Teaching Behavioral Science
347
While the BH curriculum focus should not neglect physi­cian vulnerability, including burnout, depression, and com­passion fatigue, it should also nd a way to support well-being and intentional connection to purpose in their role. This aspi­ration underlines the expectation that physicians will know about burnout, stress management, and nd an approach to integrate their personal well-being and their professional identity.
When introducing resident well-being and self- awareness, activities that encourage systems thinking will develop resi­dents’ skill in understanding and navigating social systems of which health systems are an important and relevant sub­type. Introduction of these concepts, and health system impacts on physicians can help reduce reactance when resi­dents are presented with personal development exercises and individual coping strategies for physician wellness. By fram­ing a discussion of physician burnout in the context of health systems at various levels, residents connect with the chal­lenges that they might face as participants in a system that creates vulnerability to burnout. Using these personal con­nections to systems introduces residents to important sys­tems level concepts, including family systems [18] and systems of oppression [88] that impact patients they will see throughout their careers.
It is also important to consider, as family medicine resi­dents are engaged in activities to promote self-care and reection, that some will be facing important developmental milestones (e.g., partnering, caring for parents or children, living apart from family support), and often in the middle of life stressors outside of medicine. This developmental trajec­tory, so central to the practice of family medicine, is unfold­ing for our residents as we teach about human development, coping with stress, caregiving, and identity. It may be bene­cial to incorporate opportunities for learners to reect on their own developmental trajectory and developmental stressors as they develop compassion for human develop­ment across the lifespan in the context of family and community.
Finally, the implementation of a personal development and self-care curriculum should be incrementally imple­mented throughout the course of residency, through retreats, workshops, mentorship, and didactic encounters, to maxi­mize skill development and performance across environ­ments. Strategies for longitudinal integration will require signicant adaptation for local contexts, but several exam­ples may serve to illustrate common tactics. The task of inte­grating behavioral health conversations, personal development, and self-reection is given the weight it deserves when there is longitudinal didactic time dedicated to reection and connection with others. Similarly, designing a didactic curriculum that readily connects with outpatient clinical experiences facilitates an ongoing ow from didac­tics to clinic, and back again. This seems especially impor­tant for the skills that improve clinic ow, the skills that allow physicians to navigate challenging encounters, and the in-the-moment adjustments that can be made during an
encounter based on feedback from patients or competing clinical demands. Without protected time during didactics and rotations, most residents will nd it difcult to practice self-reection consistently.
On the inpatient side, where residents have intense clini­cal experiences, regularly dedicated discussions of challeng­ing encounters, new experiences, and personal reactions boost reective capacity and develop residents’ skills in communicating bad news, handling the death of patients, and making adjustments to facilitate better team-based care. Bringing these conversations into the milieu where residents are actively encountering intense experiences can facilitate the importance of self-reection, application, and skill development.
Having multiple faculty other than the behavioral medi­cine educator(s) lead personal development and self- reection exercises can increase resident buy-in and engagement. For example, the Chair of the department may lead a “connection to purpose” moment at the beginning of resident/faculty meetings. The Program Director could incorporate a breath­ing exercise into the beginning of Resident Business Meetings. Perhaps the Sports Medicine Division lead could lead a yoga or tai chi session at the beginning of a didactic session. The more residents see their faculty role model engagement in self-care and personal development, the more it will be engrained in their own practice.
Specic Wellness Techniques andPersonal Development
There are opportunities for experiential learning and rehearsal of skills represented by various behavioral health interventions, including breathing techniques, behavioral activation, and self-compassion. Acceptance and commit­ment therapy (ACT) has shown promise in single session design [89] and provides a potential opportunity for FM resi­dents to participate and to develop their clinical acumen in a single session. For many residents, the addition of self­compassion [90] can be a welcome tool to reduce vulnerabil­ity to burnout and to encourage in patients with a variety of behavioral health concerns. In addition to adding to their clinical wisdom, residents can often add skills to their own coping repertoire when these techniques are a steady element of the curriculum.
Instruction in self-calming breath techniques has applica­tion for residents and patients alike. By training our residents in this evidence-based treatment for anxiety and panic, resi­dents may learn to manage their own symptoms, and provide them with the scaffolding and motivation to engage their patients in this practice. As breathing techniques will impact individuals in various ways, it may be helpful to provide resi­dents with several scripts and methods of breath training throughout their education, giving them a menu of options to practice and disseminate with their patients. A sample info­graphic for breathing techniques, developed for clinical teaching by Haymaker, Leckie and Roberts and presented at The Forum for Behavioral Science in 2022, is included in
348
A. Bickett et al.
section “Core Mental Health Topics” of this chapter [24] When developing residents’ skills in behavior change to address major depression, behavioral activation (see Fig.30.3) can often be more readily implemented by learn­ers with limited counseling experience, and often has imme­diate impact for patients.
Reection
Self-reection is a critical element of a curriculum to develop self-aware, effective, resilient physicians [61, 91]. It is vital giving and receiving feedback, skill renement, and the inte­gration of new knowledge. This dovetails with the Master Adaptive Learner approach discussed earlier [65], and when our learners integrate reection into their repertoire, there are clear benets [64].
Self-reection can be a challenging process, and thus it may be useful to start with a basic reection exercise that can be introduced regularly into various parts of the curriculum and tailored to experiences and learning environments. The ‘What? So What? Now What?’ approach can serve as a basic example (see Fig.30.6).
In response to “What?” learners include a description of a situation or event. In response to “So What?” learners describe their reaction to the event or situation, stating its perceived importance. In response to “Now What?” learners could briey identify implications or prospective changes they might make based on experience [92, 93]. During didac- tics this series of questions might be modied to signpost prior learning opportunities so that the residents can inte­grate foundational principles with new medical knowledge. For example, faculty can ask residents “How can you incor­porate that into your clinical practice?” or, “How does this activity connect with your purpose and values as a physi­cian?”. Learners might be asked to react to specic learning activities, identify important experiences, or process difcult encounters using simple queries to structure self-reection in the moment. In the same vein, providing explicit opportu­nities for residents to name and process emotional reactions supports physician self-reection and humanizes the educa­tion process.
While the majority of family medicine residents will dem­onstrate some level of receptiveness to self-reection, not everyone will show the same interest. Resistance may be linked to the perception that reection takes time that could be spent in other learning domains. Response to this sort of resis­tance can often be handled by incorporating reection into the curriculum (i.e., no writing assignments outside of work) and by clearly delineating objectives for self- reection as they connect to well-being and professional identity [92, 94].
Family medicine residents often benet from time to col­lect their thoughts, and for some (i.e., introverts), this con­templation seems more natural, necessary, and protable. Writing assignments and written tasks give learners the time they need to react to content and integrate their thoughts and feelings. Preceding group discussion with a written “quick
think” can boost engagement for those more introverted and develop under-utilized techniques for more extraverted learners. During a lecture or workshop, a quick think pro­vides a moment, usually less than 5minutes, sometimes less than a minute, for learners to sit quietly and digest material, often by writing to a prompt. Quick think prompts can be used early in a lecture or workshop to activate prior learning or experience (e.g., “Take a moment to reect and write about a time when you got useful feedback…”). Prompts should be used to connect with emotional reactions to case material (e.g., “Take a moment to reect on how you feel about this case so far. How do you think you would feel in the room with this patient?”) Similar prompts support effec­tive planning for behavior change (e.g., “How do you plan to implement key practices for discussion today?”). There are multiple examples of strategies for developing and accessing written practice. The work of Wald and colleagues [95] is a useful starting point.
In addition to written reection, some learners benet from social and communal opportunities to reect [96]. The pairing of a “quick think” with a dyadic or small group “pair and share” may be most useful since having someone to bear witness to their thoughts can be powerful. Pair and share activities provide a moment for learners to reect with col­leagues. Learners take turns talking about their reaction to a quick think in a pair or small group. Verbal reection with colleagues creates opportunities for vulnerability and con­nection, facilitates development of culture, and maintains a public space in which appreciation for the perspectives of peers can be appreciated (and learned from).
Balint Groups
Perhaps the quintessential practice for reection, support and well-being of physicians, Balint has been used to good effect in family medicine education for decades [97]. Balint groups incorporate many of the elements of personal devel­opment and self-awareness curriculum. When physicians come together to reveal their personal reactions and chal­lenges with their peers, Balint groups help facilitate empa­thy, connection, social support, vulnerability, compassion, and self- compassion [98]. It also provides a unique space for cognitive exibility, through the exploration of multiple per­spectives related to the physician experience, the patient experience, and the dynamics of their relationship. During Balint residents are offered the opportunity to practice trauma-informed care, as the group hypothesizes about what might be going on for a patient, instead of what is wrong with a patient. Consider, for example, a resident presenting a case of a patient who exhibited anger and aggression in the clinic space. Residents imagine what circumstances or psy­chosocial elements may have played a role in the patient’s experience, rather than the physician assuming that the patient is angry toward them. Balint groups also offer space to practice the toleration of ambiguity and the exploration and acceptance of multiple perspectives.
30 Teaching Behavioral Science
349
Fig. 30.6 Elements of self-reection
350
A. Bickett et al.
Consensus, commitment, and support from faculty and resi­dents are critical to achieve a successful Balint experience within a residency program. Facilitation skills ensure that inex­perienced participants are well-supported as they participate and help maintain a Balint program over time. Behavioral sci­ence faculty who become stewards of a Balint initiative may also need to attend to power dynamics between faculty and learners, perceived control and autonomy of learners, and advo­cacy for learners’ perspective about Balint curriculum [99].
Connections Between thePersonal andProfessional
For learners to develop self-awareness that will keep them thriving, the behavioral health curriculum should provide explicit tools to connect personal reactions to professional experiences in ways that help learners uncover bias and develop effective tools for handling professional challenges. Within the behavioral health curriculum, conversations about challenging patient encounters represent opportunities to reect on health care systems, health equity, personal bias, and communication skill. While some of these conversations will occur on the y during clinic, or within the context of relevant didactic content, utilization of a dedicated curricu­lum to help process challenging patient encounters repre­sents useful scaffolding for learners. BREATHE OUT, the curriculum developed by Edgoose and colleagues [100] rep­resents such a system and addresses the need for anticipating such encounters, for communication best practices, and for processing reactions to challenging encounters afterward. The explicit inclusion of reection about personal bias within the curriculum dovetails with required material around implicit bias and normalizes human reactions that can be handled with compassion (as opposed to avoided).
Physicians inNeed ofAssistance
While much of the behavioral science curriculum will be aimed at developing and maintaining a learning community of healthy, vibrant physician learners, given what we know about how our medical system impacts physician well-being [101, 102], and what we know about the prevalence of depression, anxiety, substance use, and suicide among physi­cians [103], the behavioral science curriculum around per­sonal development and self-awareness must address how physicians can identify and address their distress and burn­out [104]. This might include frank conversations about risk, skillful rehearsal of self-monitoring strategies, and clear identication of resources designated for physicians in need.
Resident education should include state requirements for reporting physicians in need of assistance and accessing phy­sician assistance from state agencies. Physician Health Programs (PHPs) vary in their implementation from state to state, and there is limited scholarship about best practices for reducing physician vulnerability to burnout, substance use,
depression, and suicide [105]. Most states have a mechanism for engaging physicians who are struggling, and whose per­formance has been affected. Some states encourage report­ing and engagement through “safe haven” rules and direct provision of services, while many others continue to use a more restrictive approach and physicians may incur a signi­cant personal cost for evaluation and treatment.
Within the residency, the development and maintenance of a variety of resources for physicians who express need nor­malize help-seeking and encourages self-care. Learners should be encouraged to procure resources and support via regular conversations with the program director, advisors, and from various faculty members [106]. Cultivating spaces in which psychological safety can be maintained, and where privacy can be respected increases the likelihood that learners who need help will seek it; this is especially true if core faculty can model vulnerability and model positive attitudes toward per­sonal development and self-care. Programs should incorporate protected time in resident schedules to attend healthcare appointments and may want to explicitly identify time for resi­dents to engage in self-care. Some programs also may wish to establish pathways for mental health care for all residents, giv­ing individuals the option to opt out if they wish.
Even in the best of circumstances, there will be learners who may not reveal personal concerns until they begin to impact their professional behavior [107]. The personal devel­opment and self-awareness curriculum should address these situations with predictability, clarity, and compassion where possible. While beyond the scope of this chapter, early inter­vention and remediation for professionalism lapses can be thought of as a backstop for the personal development and self-awareness curriculum, identifying learners who may be at higher risk for licensure complaints and suspensions post­graduation [108, 109].
Attending to self-care, self-awareness, and well-being of Family Medicine residents enhances the learning environment. Adult learners thrive when residencies prioritize well- being, and by explicitly addressing self-reection, emotional reactions, stress management, and burnout, we provide a framework for Family Medicine residents to enhance their self-awareness and develop the tools they will need throughout their career as a Family Medicine physician and lifelong learner.

Conclusion

The integration of behavioral science into a family medi­cine residency program is an important part of the history of our eld and will be vital to our future. The ACGME has requirementsand theAAFP has provided guidelines for the “staple ingredients” for behavioral medicine programming, but each residency program will add their own avors and unique ingredients based on the chef’s