- •VOLUME 1 CONTENTS
- •NOTATION
- •ENGLISH/METRIC AND METRIC/ENGLISH EQUIVALENTS
- •EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- •ES.1 Background
- •ES.2 BLM Proposed Action
- •ES.2.1 BLM Purpose and Need
- •ES.2.2 BLM Scope of Analysis
- •ES.2.3 Applications for Solar Energy Development on BLM Lands
- •ES.2.4 BLM Alternatives
- •ES.2.4.1 Program Elements Common to Both BLM Action Alternatives
- •ES.2.4.3 Solar Energy Zone Program Alternative
- •ES.2.4.4 No Action Alternative
- •ES.2.4.5 Reasonably Foreseeable Solar Energy Development
- •ES.2.4.6 Summary of Impacts of BLM’s Alternatives
- •ES.2.4.7 BLM’s Preferred Alternative
- •ES.3 DOE Proposed Action
- •ES.3.1 DOE Purpose and Need
- •ES.3.2 DOE Scope of Analysis
- •ES.3.3 DOE Alternatives
- •ES.3.3.2 No Action Alternative
- •ES.3.4 Summary of Impacts of DOE’s Alternatives
- •ES.4 Public Involvement, Consultation, and Coordination
- •ES.5 References
- •1 INTRODUCTION
- •1.1 Applicable Federal Orders and Mandates
- •1.1.1 Executive Order 13212
- •1.1.2 Energy Policy Act of 2005
- •1.1.3 Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
- •1.1.4 DOI Secretarial Order 3285A1
- •1.1.5 Executive Order 13514
- •1.1.6 DOI Secretarial Order 3297
- •1.3 BLM Requirements and Objectives for the PEIS
- •1.3.1 BLM’s Purpose and Need
- •1.3.2 BLM Decisions To Be Made
- •1.3.3 Authorization Process for Solar Energy Development on BLM Lands
- •1.3.3.1 New Applications
- •1.3.3.2 Pending Applications
- •1.3.3.3 Approved Applications
- •1.3.4 BLM Land Use Planning Process
- •1.3.5 BLM Scope of the Analysis
- •1.3.5.1 Program Analysis Versus SEZ-Specific Analysis
- •1.3.6 BLM Planning Criteria
- •1.4 DOE Requirements and Objectives for the PEIS
- •1.4.1 DOE’s Purpose and Need
- •1.4.2 DOE Decisions To Be Made
- •1.4.3 DOE Scope of the Analysis
- •1.5 Cooperating Agencies
- •1.6.1 Renewable Portfolio Standards and Other Regional and State Initiatives
- •1.6.2 Related Initiatives
- •1.6.2.1 Energy Corridor Designation
- •1.6.2.3 California Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan
- •1.6.2.4 Arizona Restoration Design Energy Project
- •1.6.2.5 Wind Energy Development PEIS
- •1.6.2.6 Geothermal PEIS
- •1.8 References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 BLM Alternatives
- •2.2.1 Program Elements Common to Both BLM Action Alternatives
- •2.2.1.1 Right-of-Way Authorization Policies
- •2.2.1.2 Monitoring, Adaptive Management, and Mitigation
- •2.2.1.3 Design Features
- •2.2.1.4 Segregation of Lands with Potential for Solar Development
- •2.2.2.1 Proposed Right-of-Way Exclusion Areas
- •2.2.2.2 Proposed Solar Energy Zones
- •2.2.2.3 Proposed Variance Areas for Utility-Scale Solar Energy Development
- •2.2.2.4 Land Use Plans To Be Amended
- •2.2.3 SEZ Program Alternative
- •2.2.3.1 Proposed Right-of-Way Exclusion Areas
- •2.2.3.2 Proposed Solar Energy Zones
- •2.2.3.3 Solar Energy Zone Policies
- •2.2.3.4 Land Use Plans To Be Amended
- •2.3 DOE Alternatives
- •2.3.1 No Action Alternative
- •2.3.2 Action Alternative—DOE’s Proposed Programmatic Environmental Guidance
- •2.3.2.1 General Mitigation Measures
- •2.3.2.2 Institutional and Public Outreach
- •2.3.2.3 Land Use
- •2.3.2.4 Water Resources and Erosion Control
- •2.3.2.5 Biological Resources
- •2.3.2.6 Air Quality
- •2.3.2.7 Cultural Resources and Native American Interactions
- •2.3.2.8 Visual Resources and Aesthetics
- •2.3.2.9 Socioeconomics
- •2.3.2.10 Environmental Justice
- •2.3.2.11 Safety and Health
- •2.4 Description of Reasonably Foreseeable Development Scenario
- •2.4.1 Comparison of RFDS with Lands Available under the Action Alternatives
- •2.5 Other Alternatives and Issues Considered
- •2.5.1 Distributed Generation
- •2.5.2 Conservation and Demand-Side Management
- •2.5.3 Analysis of Life-Cycle Impacts of Solar Energy Development
- •2.5.4 Analysis of Development on Other Federal, State, or Private Lands
- •2.5.5 Restricting Development to Previously Disturbed Lands
- •2.5.6 Restricting Development to Populated Areas
- •2.5.7 Restricting Development to the Fast-Track Project Applications
- •2.5.8 Analysis of Development on the Maximum Amount of Public Lands Allowable
- •2.5.9 Changes to BLM’s Proposed Solar Energy Zones
- •2.5.10 Other Suggested Alternatives
- •2.5.11 DOE Environmental Requirements
- •2.6 References
- •3.1 Technologies
- •3.2 Development Process Overview for All Technologies
- •3.2.1 Site Characterization
- •3.2.2 Site Preparation and Construction
- •3.2.3 Operations
- •3.2.4 Decommissioning and Reclamation
- •3.2.5 Transmission Facilities
- •3.4 Transportation Considerations
- •3.6 Health and Safety Aspects of Solar Energy Projects
- •3.7 Existing Agency Processes and Guidance
- •3.8 References
- •4 UPDATE TO AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Lands and Realty
- •4.4 Rangeland Resources
- •4.4.1 Livestock Grazing
- •4.4.2 Wild Horses and Burros
- •4.4.3 Wildland Fire
- •4.5 Recreation
- •4.6 Military and Civilian Aviation
- •4.7 Geologic Setting and Soil Resources
- •4.7.1 Geologic Setting
- •4.7.2 Geologic Hazards
- •4.7.3 Soil Resources
- •4.8 Minerals
- •4.9 Water Resources
- •4.9.1 Surface Water Resources
- •4.9.2 Groundwater Resources
- •4.9.3 Water Rights, Supply, and Use
- •4.10 Ecological Resources
- •4.10.1 Vegetation
- •4.10.2 Wildlife
- •4.10.3 Aquatic Biota
- •4.10.3.1 Pacific Northwest Hydrologic Region
- •4.10.3.2 Lower Colorado, Rio Grande, and Great Basin Hydrologic Regions
- •4.10.3.3 California Hydrologic Region
- •4.10.3.4 Upper Colorado River Hydrologic Region
- •4.10.3.5 Missouri River Basin Hydrologic Region
- •4.10.4 Special Status Species
- •4.11 Air Quality and Climate
- •4.11.3 Update to Section 4.11.2.4 of the Draft Solar PEIS: Visibility Protection
- •4.11.4 Update to Section 4.11.2.5 of the Draft Solar PEIS: General Conformity
- •4.11.5 Addition of New Section 4.11.4: Toxic Dust and Snowmelt
- •4.12 Visual Resources
- •4.13 Acoustic Environment
- •4.14 Paleontological Resources
- •4.15 Cultural Resources
- •4.16 Native American Concerns
- •4.17 Socioeconomics
- •4.18 Environmental Justice
- •4.19 References
- •4.20 Errata to Chapter 4 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Lands and Realty
- •5.4 Rangeland Resources
- •5.4.1 Livestock Grazing
- •5.4.2 Wild Horses and Burros
- •5.4.3 Wildland Fire
- •5.5 Recreation
- •5.6 Military and Civilian Aviation
- •5.7 Geologic Setting and Soil Resources
- •5.8 Minerals
- •5.9 Water Resources
- •5.10 Ecological Resources
- •5.10.1 Vegetation
- •5.10.2 Wildlife
- •5.10.3 Aquatic Biota and Habitats
- •5.10.3.1 Common Impacts
- •5.10.3.2 Technology-Specific Impacts
- •5.10.4 Special Status Species
- •5.11 Air Quality and Climate
- •5.11.1 Common Impacts
- •5.11.1.1 Construction: Update to Section 5.11.1.2 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.11.1.2 Operations: Update to Section 5.11.1.3 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.12 Visual Resources
- •5.13 Acoustic Environment
- •5.13.1 Common Impacts
- •5.13.1.1 Construction: Update to Section 5.13.1.2 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.13.1.2 Operations: Update to Section 5.13.1.3 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.14 Paleontological Resources
- •5.15 Cultural Resources
- •5.15.1 Common Impacts
- •5.16 Native American Concerns
- •5.17 Socioeconomics
- •5.18 Environmental Justice
- •5.19 Transportation
- •5.20 Hazardous Materials and Waste
- •5.21 Health and Safety
- •5.22 References
- •5.23 Errata to Chapter 5 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •6 ANALYSIS OF BLM’S SOLAR ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES
- •6.1.2 Minimize Environmental Impacts
- •6.1.3 Minimize Social and Economic Impacts
- •6.1.4 Provide Flexibility to Solar Industry
- •6.1.5 Optimize Existing Transmission Infrastructure and Corridors
- •6.1.6 Standardize and Streamline the Authorization Process
- •6.1.7 Meet Projected Demand for Solar Energy Development
- •6.2 Impacts of the SEZ Program Alternative
- •6.2.2 Minimize Environmental Impacts
- •6.2.3 Minimize Social and Economic Impacts
- •6.2.4 Provide Flexibility to Solar Industry
- •6.2.5 Optimize Existing Transmission Infrastructure and Corridors
- •6.2.6 Standardize and Streamline the Authorization Process
- •6.2.7 Meet Projected Demand for Solar Energy Development
- •6.3 Impacts of the No Action Alternative
- •6.3.2 Minimize Environmental Impacts
- •6.3.3 Minimize Social and Economic Impacts
- •6.3.4 Provide Flexibility to Solar Industry
- •6.3.5 Optimize Existing Transmission Infrastructure and Corridors
- •6.3.6 Standardize and Streamline the Authorization Process
- •6.3.7 Meet Projected Demand for Solar Energy Development
- •6.5 Cumulative Impacts
- •6.5.1 Overview of Activities in the Six-State Study Area
- •6.5.1.1 Energy Production and Distribution
- •6.5.1.2 Other Activities and Trends
- •6.5.2 Cumulative Impact Assessment for Solar Energy Development
- •6.5.2.1 Lands and Realty
- •6.5.2.2 Specially Designated Areas and Lands with Wilderness Characteristics
- •6.5.2.3 Rangeland Resources
- •6.5.2.4 Recreation
- •6.5.2.5 Military and Civilian Aviation
- •6.5.2.6 Geologic Setting and Soil Resources
- •6.5.2.7 Mineral Resources
- •6.5.2.8 Water Resources
- •6.5.2.9 Ecological Resources
- •6.5.2.10 Air Quality and Climate
- •6.5.2.11 Visual Resources
- •6.5.2.12 Acoustic Environment
- •6.5.2.13 Paleontological Resources
- •6.5.2.14 Cultural Resources
- •6.5.2.15 Native American Concerns
- •6.5.2.16 Socioeconomics
- •6.5.2.17 Environmental Justice
- •6.5.2.18 Transportation
- •6.6 Other NEPA Considerations
- •6.6.1 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
- •6.6.2 Short-Term Use of the Environment and Long-Term Productivity
- •6.6.3 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources
- •6.6.4 Mitigation of Adverse Effects
- •6.7 References
- •7 ANALYSIS OF DOE’S ALTERNATIVES
- •7.1 Impacts of DOE’s Proposed Action
- •7.2 Impacts of the No Action Alternative
- •7.3 Cumulative Impacts
- •7.4 Other NEPA Considerations
- •7.4.1 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
- •7.4.2 Short-Term Use of the Environment and Long-Term Productivity
- •7.4.3 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources
- •7.4.4 Mitigation of Adverse Effects
- •14.1 Public Scoping and Public Outreach
- •14.2 Government-to-Government Consultation
- •14.3 Coordination of BLM State and Field Offices
- •14.4 Agency Cooperation, Consultation, and Coordination
- •14.5 References
- •15 LIST OF PREPARERS
- •16 GLOSSARY
- •FIGURE ES.2-1 Areas Proposed for Exclusion Since Publication of the Supplement to the Draft Solar PEIS Based on Continued Consultation with Cooperating Agencies and Tribes
- •FIGURE ES.2-4 BLM-Administered Lands in Colorado Available for Application for Solar Energy ROW Authorizations under the BLM Alternatives Considered in This PEIS
- •FIGURE 1.2-2 Solar Direct Normal Insolation Levels in the Southwestern United States
- •FIGURE 2.2-3 BLM-Administered Lands in Colorado Available for Application for Solar Energy ROW Authorizations under the BLM Alternatives Considered in This PEIS
- •FIGURE 2.2-7 Areas Proposed for Exclusion Since Publication of the Supplement to the Draft Solar PEIS Based on Continued Consultation with Cooperating Agencies and Tribes
- •TABLE ES.2-3 Proposed SEZs and Approximate Acreage by State
- •TABLE ES.2-5 Summary-Level Assessment of Potential Environmental Impacts of Utility-Scale Solar Energy Development by Alternative
- •TABLE ES.2-6 Comparison of BLM’s Alternatives with Respect to Objectives for the Agency’s Action
- •TABLE 2.2-3 Proposed SEZs and Approximate Acreage by State
- •TABLE 4.15-3 ACECs Designated for Protection of Cultural Resource Values That Are near BLM-Administered Lands Available for Application through the Variance Process
- •TABLE 6.1-2 Summary-Level Assessment of Potential Environmental Impacts of Utility-Scale Solar Energy Development by Alternative
- •TABLE 6.4-1 Comparison of BLM’s Alternatives with Respect to Objectives for the Agencies’ Action
- •TABLE 6.5-10 Recreational Visits for the BLM and NPS in FY 2000 and FY 2010 and for USFS in FY 2000 and FY 2010
114 UPDATE TO CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION UNDERTAKEN
2 |
TO SUPPORT PREPARATION OF THE PEIS |
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
Chapter 14 of the Draft Solar PEIS provided information on public scoping that was |
6conducted for the Solar PEIS (Section 14.1); government-to-government consultation with
7tribes that was done prior to publication of the Draft Solar PEIS (Section 14.2); coordination
8 with BLM state and field offices (Section 14.3); and other agency cooperation, consultation, and
9coordination (Section 14.4). The information presented in this update to Chapter 14 for the Final
10Solar PEIS summarizes and supplements, but does not replace, the information provided in the
11corresponding Chapter 14 in the Draft Solar PEIS. Information on the topics listed above that has
12become available subsequent to publication of the Draft Solar PEIS is presented in this section,
13including a summary of the public outreach that has been conducted subsequent to publication of
14the Draft Solar PEIS.
15
16
17 14.1 PUBLIC SCOPING AND PUBLIC OUTREACH
18
19This section updates the information regarding public scoping and outreach provided in
20the Draft Solar PEIS.
21
22The Notice of Availability (NOA) of the Draft Solar PEIS was published in Volume 75,
23page 78980, of the Federal Register on December 17, 2010. The public comment period for the
24Draft Solar PEIS that was originally announced was 90 days; however, in response to
25stakeholder requests, the comment period was extended to May 2, 2012. Fourteen public
26meetings were held during the comment period for the Draft Solar PEIS. Comments on the Draft
27Solar PEIS were submitted via the Solar PEIS project Web site (http://solareis.anl.gov), by mail,
28and orally at public meetings. Several nongovernmental organizations submitted comments in
29the form of standardized campaign letters from their constituents. Six campaigns on the Draft
30PEIS were submitted, with more than 86,000 individuals represented. In addition, approximately
311,950 comment documents on the Draft Solar PEIS were received, and about 150 comments
32were received orally at public meetings. Comments were received from individual members of
33the public; federal, state, and local governmental agencies; tribes; solar companies and solar
34industry organizations; environmental organizations; utilities; ranchers; water districts; and many
35other types of organizations. Comments were primarily received from organizations and
36individuals within the six-state study area.
37
38In response to comments on the Draft Solar PEIS that provided suggestions on how the
39BLM and DOE could increase the utility of the analysis, strengthen elements of BLM’s proposed
40Solar Energy Program, and increase certainty regarding solar energy development on BLM-
41administered lands, the Agencies published a Supplement to the Draft Solar PEIS. As part of the
42Supplement, the BLM made significant changes to the proposed program, including eliminating
43seven SEZs from further consideration and reducing the size of several of the remaining SEZs,
44adding variance areas and a variance process, and creating an identification protocol for new
45SEZs. The NOA of the Supplement was published on page 66958 in Volume 76 of the Federal
46Register on October 28, 2011. The public comment period for the Supplement to the Draft Solar
Final Solar PEIS |
14-1 |
July 2012 |
1PEIS ran from October 28, 2011, to January 27, 2012. The agencies convened five public
2 meetings on the Supplement; one meeting in the San Luis Valley of Colorado was not originally 3 planned but was added in response to stakeholder requests. Comments on the Supplement to the 4 Draft Solar PEIS were received from the same broad cross-section of entities that commented on 5 the Draft Solar PEIS. Comments were submitted via the Solar PEIS project Web site, by mail, 6 and orally at public meetings. Six campaigns on the Supplement to the Draft PEIS were
7 submitted, with more than 134,000 individuals represented. In addition, approximately 8 250 comment documents were received from individuals and organizations, and about 9 64 comments were received orally at public meetings.
10
11The agencies have offered other opportunities for public involvement throughout the
12process of preparing the Solar PEIS. The Solar PEIS project Web site (http://solareis.anl.gov)
13was made available to the public to provide access to relevant project information, and the
14opportunity to subscribe through the Web site to receive e-mail updates of important project
15milestones was provided as well. In response to requests to provide the public with an
16opportunity to review key new or revised materials prior to release of the Final Solar PEIS,
17several key elements of BLM’s Solar Energy Program were made available through the project
18Web site in April 2012 (i.e., proposed programmatic design features, the proposed Solar LTMP,
19and the proposed Regional Mitigation Framework). The BLM has continued to work closely
20with cooperating agencies and other stakeholders throughout the preparation of the Final Solar
21PEIS.
22
23
24 14.2 GOVERNMENT-TO-GOVERNMENT CONSULTATION
25
26The federal government works on a government-to-government basis with Native
27American tribes. Government-to-government consultation efforts undertaken through the
28publication of the Draft Solar PEIS were described in Section 14.2 of the Draft and are not
29repeated here.
30
31Since release of the Draft Solar PEIS, the BLM has sent 314 federally recognized tribes,
32bands, and chapters copies of the Draft Solar PEIS, the Supplement to the Draft Solar PEIS, and
33supporting materials, such as the Draft Solar PA and a question and answer (Q&A) fact sheet
34related to the solar energy program. These were transmitted in February and October of 2011,
35and copies of those cover letters are available in Appendix K of this Final Solar PEIS. The BLM
36also issued IM 2012-032 in December 2011, which established the schedule and procedure for
37ongoing government-to-government consultation in connection with the solar energy program
38(BLM 2011). The IM directed field offices to take additional steps to explain to Native American
39tribes how their input was taken into account during the preparation of the Final Solar PEIS and
40how consultation will continue upon the receipt of project-specific solar applications. This IM is
41provided in Section K.1.3 of Appendix K.
42
43Consultation in the form of correspondence, phone conversations, e-mails, and
44transmissions of maps, documents, and reports has taken place with more than 65 tribes.
45Face-to-face meetings with 18 tribes have led to the exchange of information and discussion of
46concerns that have shaped the outcome of this PEIS process. Fifteen federally recognized tribes
Final Solar PEIS |
14-2 |
July 2012 |
1 commented on the Draft Solar PEIS and the Supplement to the Draft. All this information is 2 summarized in Appendix K, particularly in Table K-2.
3
4 Consultation between the BLM and the tribes is ongoing and will continue to take place 5 after the release of the Final Solar PEIS.
6
7
8 14.3 COORDINATION OF BLM STATE AND FIELD OFFICES
9
10The coordination with BLM state and field office staff as described in Section 14.3 of the
11Draft Solar PEIS continued throughout preparation of the Supplement to the Draft Solar PEIS
12and the Final Solar PEIS. Conference calls and other communications took place to review
13comments received and to review requests for additional exclusions to lands available for solar
14ROW application in light of the region-specific knowledge held by the BLM staff in those
15offices. State and field office staff provided GIS data that allowed revised mapping of the lands
16available under the various BLM alternatives. The BLM Washington Office staff will continue
17to work with state and field office staff following the release of the ROD for the Solar PEIS to
18facilitate implementation of the new Solar Energy Program.
19
20
21 14.4 AGENCY COOPERATION, CONSULTATION, AND COORDINATION
22
23As stated in Section 14.4 of the Draft Solar PEIS, a total of 19 agencies, listed in
24Section 1.5 of this Final Solar PEIS, are working with the BLM and/or DOE as cooperating
25agencies. These agencies include six federal agencies, six state agencies, and seven counties.
26Interactions with the cooperating agencies have continued throughout preparation of the Final
27Solar PEIS through reviews of draft sections of text prior to issuance of the Final.
28
29In accordance with the requirements of Section 106 of the NHPA, coordination with
30SHPOs in each of the six states in the study area and with the ACHP has continued throughout
31preparation of the Final Solar PEIS. In particular, consultation has continued on the content of a
32Solar PA. The Solar PA will provide for a phased consultation process related to historic,
33traditional, and cultural resources for the Solar PEIS and subsequent activities that could tier
34from the Solar PEIS ROD. Updated information regarding the consultation process is provided in
35Section K.2 of Appendix K of this Final Solar PEIS.
36
37In addition, the BLM has continued consultation with the USFWS in accordance with
38the requirements of Section 7 of the ESA to ensure that BLM’s proposed action would not
39jeopardize the continued existence of any listed threatened or endangered species. The BLM, in
40consultation with the USFWS, is undertaking a conservation review pursuant to Section 7(a)(1)
41of the ESA on the overall Solar Energy Program. This consultation on the overarching program
42will provide guidance for subsequent solar projects by ensuring that the appropriate conservation
43measures for listed species are incorporated into project-level actions. The BLM is also engaged
44in programmatic consultation with the USFWS on the identification of SEZs under
45Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA, initiated through the submission of a programmatic BA. This BA
46describes potential effects on ESA-listed species and designated critical habitat from expected
Final Solar PEIS |
14-3 |
July 2012 |
1solar development in SEZs and any appropriate mitigation, minimization, and avoidance
2measures. Additional Section 7(a)(2) consultation will occur, as necessary, at the level of
3 individual solar energy projects and will benefit from the preceding programmatic consultation 4 and resulting programmatic BO for SEZs.
5
6 ESA consultation was initiated by providing a review copy of the Draft Conservation 7 Assessment and of the Draft BA to the USFWS in January 2012. Comments provided by the 8 USFWS were addressed by the BLM in the final versions of both documents. The USFWS is 9 expected to issue a Conservation Review and Programmatic Biological Opinion that addresses
10each of the proposed SEZs prior to the publication of the ROD for this Solar PEIS (expected in
11the late fall of 2012). The results of this consultation will be reflected in the ROD for the Solar
12PEIS.
13
14The BLM has continued activities to coordinate and consult with the governors in each of
15the six states and with state agencies through the development of the Supplement to the Draft
16PEIS and the Final Solar PEIS. Prior to approval of the proposed plan amendments presented in
17Appendix C of this Final Solar PEIS, the BLM will undertake a Governor’s Consistency Review
18(as required under CFR 43 1610.3-2[e]), in which the governors of each state will be given the
19opportunity to identify any inconsistencies between the proposed plan amendments and state or
20local plans and to provide recommendations in writing (during the 60-day consistency review
21period). Coordination with state agencies is expected to continue through implementation of the
22new Solar Energy Program.
23
24
25 14.5 REFERENCES
26
27Note to Reader: This list of references identifies Web pages and associated URLs where
28reference data were obtained for the analyses presented in this Final Solar PEIS. It is likely that
29at the time of publication of this Final Solar PEIS, some of these Web pages may no longer be
30available or their URL addresses may have changed. The original information has been retained
31and is available through the Public Information Docket for this Final Solar PEIS.
32
33BLM 2011, Instruction Memorandum 2012-032, Native American Consultation and Section 106
34Compliance for the Solar Energy Program Described in Solar Programmatic Impact Statement,
35U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C., Dec. 1.
36
37
Final Solar PEIS |
14-4 |
July 2012 |
