- •VOLUME 1 CONTENTS
- •NOTATION
- •ENGLISH/METRIC AND METRIC/ENGLISH EQUIVALENTS
- •EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- •ES.1 Background
- •ES.2 BLM Proposed Action
- •ES.2.1 BLM Purpose and Need
- •ES.2.2 BLM Scope of Analysis
- •ES.2.3 Applications for Solar Energy Development on BLM Lands
- •ES.2.4 BLM Alternatives
- •ES.2.4.1 Program Elements Common to Both BLM Action Alternatives
- •ES.2.4.3 Solar Energy Zone Program Alternative
- •ES.2.4.4 No Action Alternative
- •ES.2.4.5 Reasonably Foreseeable Solar Energy Development
- •ES.2.4.6 Summary of Impacts of BLM’s Alternatives
- •ES.2.4.7 BLM’s Preferred Alternative
- •ES.3 DOE Proposed Action
- •ES.3.1 DOE Purpose and Need
- •ES.3.2 DOE Scope of Analysis
- •ES.3.3 DOE Alternatives
- •ES.3.3.2 No Action Alternative
- •ES.3.4 Summary of Impacts of DOE’s Alternatives
- •ES.4 Public Involvement, Consultation, and Coordination
- •ES.5 References
- •1 INTRODUCTION
- •1.1 Applicable Federal Orders and Mandates
- •1.1.1 Executive Order 13212
- •1.1.2 Energy Policy Act of 2005
- •1.1.3 Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
- •1.1.4 DOI Secretarial Order 3285A1
- •1.1.5 Executive Order 13514
- •1.1.6 DOI Secretarial Order 3297
- •1.3 BLM Requirements and Objectives for the PEIS
- •1.3.1 BLM’s Purpose and Need
- •1.3.2 BLM Decisions To Be Made
- •1.3.3 Authorization Process for Solar Energy Development on BLM Lands
- •1.3.3.1 New Applications
- •1.3.3.2 Pending Applications
- •1.3.3.3 Approved Applications
- •1.3.4 BLM Land Use Planning Process
- •1.3.5 BLM Scope of the Analysis
- •1.3.5.1 Program Analysis Versus SEZ-Specific Analysis
- •1.3.6 BLM Planning Criteria
- •1.4 DOE Requirements and Objectives for the PEIS
- •1.4.1 DOE’s Purpose and Need
- •1.4.2 DOE Decisions To Be Made
- •1.4.3 DOE Scope of the Analysis
- •1.5 Cooperating Agencies
- •1.6.1 Renewable Portfolio Standards and Other Regional and State Initiatives
- •1.6.2 Related Initiatives
- •1.6.2.1 Energy Corridor Designation
- •1.6.2.3 California Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan
- •1.6.2.4 Arizona Restoration Design Energy Project
- •1.6.2.5 Wind Energy Development PEIS
- •1.6.2.6 Geothermal PEIS
- •1.8 References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 BLM Alternatives
- •2.2.1 Program Elements Common to Both BLM Action Alternatives
- •2.2.1.1 Right-of-Way Authorization Policies
- •2.2.1.2 Monitoring, Adaptive Management, and Mitigation
- •2.2.1.3 Design Features
- •2.2.1.4 Segregation of Lands with Potential for Solar Development
- •2.2.2.1 Proposed Right-of-Way Exclusion Areas
- •2.2.2.2 Proposed Solar Energy Zones
- •2.2.2.3 Proposed Variance Areas for Utility-Scale Solar Energy Development
- •2.2.2.4 Land Use Plans To Be Amended
- •2.2.3 SEZ Program Alternative
- •2.2.3.1 Proposed Right-of-Way Exclusion Areas
- •2.2.3.2 Proposed Solar Energy Zones
- •2.2.3.3 Solar Energy Zone Policies
- •2.2.3.4 Land Use Plans To Be Amended
- •2.3 DOE Alternatives
- •2.3.1 No Action Alternative
- •2.3.2 Action Alternative—DOE’s Proposed Programmatic Environmental Guidance
- •2.3.2.1 General Mitigation Measures
- •2.3.2.2 Institutional and Public Outreach
- •2.3.2.3 Land Use
- •2.3.2.4 Water Resources and Erosion Control
- •2.3.2.5 Biological Resources
- •2.3.2.6 Air Quality
- •2.3.2.7 Cultural Resources and Native American Interactions
- •2.3.2.8 Visual Resources and Aesthetics
- •2.3.2.9 Socioeconomics
- •2.3.2.10 Environmental Justice
- •2.3.2.11 Safety and Health
- •2.4 Description of Reasonably Foreseeable Development Scenario
- •2.4.1 Comparison of RFDS with Lands Available under the Action Alternatives
- •2.5 Other Alternatives and Issues Considered
- •2.5.1 Distributed Generation
- •2.5.2 Conservation and Demand-Side Management
- •2.5.3 Analysis of Life-Cycle Impacts of Solar Energy Development
- •2.5.4 Analysis of Development on Other Federal, State, or Private Lands
- •2.5.5 Restricting Development to Previously Disturbed Lands
- •2.5.6 Restricting Development to Populated Areas
- •2.5.7 Restricting Development to the Fast-Track Project Applications
- •2.5.8 Analysis of Development on the Maximum Amount of Public Lands Allowable
- •2.5.9 Changes to BLM’s Proposed Solar Energy Zones
- •2.5.10 Other Suggested Alternatives
- •2.5.11 DOE Environmental Requirements
- •2.6 References
- •3.1 Technologies
- •3.2 Development Process Overview for All Technologies
- •3.2.1 Site Characterization
- •3.2.2 Site Preparation and Construction
- •3.2.3 Operations
- •3.2.4 Decommissioning and Reclamation
- •3.2.5 Transmission Facilities
- •3.4 Transportation Considerations
- •3.6 Health and Safety Aspects of Solar Energy Projects
- •3.7 Existing Agency Processes and Guidance
- •3.8 References
- •4 UPDATE TO AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Lands and Realty
- •4.4 Rangeland Resources
- •4.4.1 Livestock Grazing
- •4.4.2 Wild Horses and Burros
- •4.4.3 Wildland Fire
- •4.5 Recreation
- •4.6 Military and Civilian Aviation
- •4.7 Geologic Setting and Soil Resources
- •4.7.1 Geologic Setting
- •4.7.2 Geologic Hazards
- •4.7.3 Soil Resources
- •4.8 Minerals
- •4.9 Water Resources
- •4.9.1 Surface Water Resources
- •4.9.2 Groundwater Resources
- •4.9.3 Water Rights, Supply, and Use
- •4.10 Ecological Resources
- •4.10.1 Vegetation
- •4.10.2 Wildlife
- •4.10.3 Aquatic Biota
- •4.10.3.1 Pacific Northwest Hydrologic Region
- •4.10.3.2 Lower Colorado, Rio Grande, and Great Basin Hydrologic Regions
- •4.10.3.3 California Hydrologic Region
- •4.10.3.4 Upper Colorado River Hydrologic Region
- •4.10.3.5 Missouri River Basin Hydrologic Region
- •4.10.4 Special Status Species
- •4.11 Air Quality and Climate
- •4.11.3 Update to Section 4.11.2.4 of the Draft Solar PEIS: Visibility Protection
- •4.11.4 Update to Section 4.11.2.5 of the Draft Solar PEIS: General Conformity
- •4.11.5 Addition of New Section 4.11.4: Toxic Dust and Snowmelt
- •4.12 Visual Resources
- •4.13 Acoustic Environment
- •4.14 Paleontological Resources
- •4.15 Cultural Resources
- •4.16 Native American Concerns
- •4.17 Socioeconomics
- •4.18 Environmental Justice
- •4.19 References
- •4.20 Errata to Chapter 4 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Lands and Realty
- •5.4 Rangeland Resources
- •5.4.1 Livestock Grazing
- •5.4.2 Wild Horses and Burros
- •5.4.3 Wildland Fire
- •5.5 Recreation
- •5.6 Military and Civilian Aviation
- •5.7 Geologic Setting and Soil Resources
- •5.8 Minerals
- •5.9 Water Resources
- •5.10 Ecological Resources
- •5.10.1 Vegetation
- •5.10.2 Wildlife
- •5.10.3 Aquatic Biota and Habitats
- •5.10.3.1 Common Impacts
- •5.10.3.2 Technology-Specific Impacts
- •5.10.4 Special Status Species
- •5.11 Air Quality and Climate
- •5.11.1 Common Impacts
- •5.11.1.1 Construction: Update to Section 5.11.1.2 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.11.1.2 Operations: Update to Section 5.11.1.3 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.12 Visual Resources
- •5.13 Acoustic Environment
- •5.13.1 Common Impacts
- •5.13.1.1 Construction: Update to Section 5.13.1.2 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.13.1.2 Operations: Update to Section 5.13.1.3 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •5.14 Paleontological Resources
- •5.15 Cultural Resources
- •5.15.1 Common Impacts
- •5.16 Native American Concerns
- •5.17 Socioeconomics
- •5.18 Environmental Justice
- •5.19 Transportation
- •5.20 Hazardous Materials and Waste
- •5.21 Health and Safety
- •5.22 References
- •5.23 Errata to Chapter 5 of the Draft Solar PEIS
- •6 ANALYSIS OF BLM’S SOLAR ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES
- •6.1.2 Minimize Environmental Impacts
- •6.1.3 Minimize Social and Economic Impacts
- •6.1.4 Provide Flexibility to Solar Industry
- •6.1.5 Optimize Existing Transmission Infrastructure and Corridors
- •6.1.6 Standardize and Streamline the Authorization Process
- •6.1.7 Meet Projected Demand for Solar Energy Development
- •6.2 Impacts of the SEZ Program Alternative
- •6.2.2 Minimize Environmental Impacts
- •6.2.3 Minimize Social and Economic Impacts
- •6.2.4 Provide Flexibility to Solar Industry
- •6.2.5 Optimize Existing Transmission Infrastructure and Corridors
- •6.2.6 Standardize and Streamline the Authorization Process
- •6.2.7 Meet Projected Demand for Solar Energy Development
- •6.3 Impacts of the No Action Alternative
- •6.3.2 Minimize Environmental Impacts
- •6.3.3 Minimize Social and Economic Impacts
- •6.3.4 Provide Flexibility to Solar Industry
- •6.3.5 Optimize Existing Transmission Infrastructure and Corridors
- •6.3.6 Standardize and Streamline the Authorization Process
- •6.3.7 Meet Projected Demand for Solar Energy Development
- •6.5 Cumulative Impacts
- •6.5.1 Overview of Activities in the Six-State Study Area
- •6.5.1.1 Energy Production and Distribution
- •6.5.1.2 Other Activities and Trends
- •6.5.2 Cumulative Impact Assessment for Solar Energy Development
- •6.5.2.1 Lands and Realty
- •6.5.2.2 Specially Designated Areas and Lands with Wilderness Characteristics
- •6.5.2.3 Rangeland Resources
- •6.5.2.4 Recreation
- •6.5.2.5 Military and Civilian Aviation
- •6.5.2.6 Geologic Setting and Soil Resources
- •6.5.2.7 Mineral Resources
- •6.5.2.8 Water Resources
- •6.5.2.9 Ecological Resources
- •6.5.2.10 Air Quality and Climate
- •6.5.2.11 Visual Resources
- •6.5.2.12 Acoustic Environment
- •6.5.2.13 Paleontological Resources
- •6.5.2.14 Cultural Resources
- •6.5.2.15 Native American Concerns
- •6.5.2.16 Socioeconomics
- •6.5.2.17 Environmental Justice
- •6.5.2.18 Transportation
- •6.6 Other NEPA Considerations
- •6.6.1 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
- •6.6.2 Short-Term Use of the Environment and Long-Term Productivity
- •6.6.3 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources
- •6.6.4 Mitigation of Adverse Effects
- •6.7 References
- •7 ANALYSIS OF DOE’S ALTERNATIVES
- •7.1 Impacts of DOE’s Proposed Action
- •7.2 Impacts of the No Action Alternative
- •7.3 Cumulative Impacts
- •7.4 Other NEPA Considerations
- •7.4.1 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
- •7.4.2 Short-Term Use of the Environment and Long-Term Productivity
- •7.4.3 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources
- •7.4.4 Mitigation of Adverse Effects
- •14.1 Public Scoping and Public Outreach
- •14.2 Government-to-Government Consultation
- •14.3 Coordination of BLM State and Field Offices
- •14.4 Agency Cooperation, Consultation, and Coordination
- •14.5 References
- •15 LIST OF PREPARERS
- •16 GLOSSARY
- •FIGURE ES.2-1 Areas Proposed for Exclusion Since Publication of the Supplement to the Draft Solar PEIS Based on Continued Consultation with Cooperating Agencies and Tribes
- •FIGURE ES.2-4 BLM-Administered Lands in Colorado Available for Application for Solar Energy ROW Authorizations under the BLM Alternatives Considered in This PEIS
- •FIGURE 1.2-2 Solar Direct Normal Insolation Levels in the Southwestern United States
- •FIGURE 2.2-3 BLM-Administered Lands in Colorado Available for Application for Solar Energy ROW Authorizations under the BLM Alternatives Considered in This PEIS
- •FIGURE 2.2-7 Areas Proposed for Exclusion Since Publication of the Supplement to the Draft Solar PEIS Based on Continued Consultation with Cooperating Agencies and Tribes
- •TABLE ES.2-3 Proposed SEZs and Approximate Acreage by State
- •TABLE ES.2-5 Summary-Level Assessment of Potential Environmental Impacts of Utility-Scale Solar Energy Development by Alternative
- •TABLE ES.2-6 Comparison of BLM’s Alternatives with Respect to Objectives for the Agency’s Action
- •TABLE 2.2-3 Proposed SEZs and Approximate Acreage by State
- •TABLE 4.15-3 ACECs Designated for Protection of Cultural Resource Values That Are near BLM-Administered Lands Available for Application through the Variance Process
- •TABLE 6.1-2 Summary-Level Assessment of Potential Environmental Impacts of Utility-Scale Solar Energy Development by Alternative
- •TABLE 6.4-1 Comparison of BLM’s Alternatives with Respect to Objectives for the Agencies’ Action
- •TABLE 6.5-10 Recreational Visits for the BLM and NPS in FY 2000 and FY 2010 and for USFS in FY 2000 and FY 2010
1 4.20 ERRATA TO CHAPTER 4 OF THE DRAFT SOLAR PEIS
2
3This section presents corrections to material presented in the Draft Solar PEIS. The need
4for these corrections was identified in several ways: through comments received on the Draft
5Solar PEIS and the Supplement to the Draft (and verified by the authors), through new
6information obtained by the authors subsequent to publication of the Draft and Supplement to the
7Draft, or through additional review of the original material by the authors. Table 4.20-1 provides
8corrections to information presented in the Draft Solar PEIS.
9
Final Solar PEIS |
4-46 |
July 2012 |
PEIS Solar inalF
47-4
2012 ulyJ
1
TABLE 4.20-1 Errata to Chapter 4 (Affected Environment) of the Draft Solar PEIS
Section No. |
Page No. |
Line No. |
Figure No. |
Table No. |
Correction |
4.7.1 |
4-20 |
|
|
4.7-1 |
In the last column of the Basin and Range entry (under Rock Types), there should |
|
|
|
|
|
be a space between the words “Cenozoic” and “volcanic.” |
4.10.2.3 |
4-87 |
18–19 |
|
|
The sentence should read, “These include the moose (Alces americanus) in |
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado and Utah; American bison (Bos bison) in Arizona, California, |
|
|
|
|
|
New Mexico, and Utah (primarily in privately or publicly held herds);” |
4.11.1.1 |
4-115 |
39 |
|
|
“Arizona with daily ranges as large as 50 to 60 F (10 to 16 C).” should read |
|
|
|
|
|
“Arizona with daily ranges as large as 50 to 60 F (28 to 33 C).” |
4.11.1.2 |
4-117 |
13 |
|
|
“is heavy (in excess of 50 in. [130 cm] per year)” should read “is heavy (in excess |
|
|
|
|
|
of 50 in. [127 cm] per year)” |
4.11.1.2 |
4-117 |
15 |
|
|
“Range and the Sierra Nevada and lighter on the eastern slopes (under 9 in. [20 cm] |
|
|
|
|
|
in some” should read “Range and the Sierra Nevada and lighter on the eastern |
|
|
|
|
|
slopes (under 9 in. [23 cm] in some” |
4.11.1.4 |
4-118 |
10 |
|
|
“30 to 35F (17 to 19C ). Summer temperatures” should read “30 to 35 F (17 to |
|
|
|
|
|
19 C). Summer temperatures” |
4.11.2.5 |
4-130 |
9–10 |
|
|
The following text should be deleted: “The EPA proposed new general conformity |
|
|
|
|
|
regulations on January 8, 2008 (58 FR 1402); there will be changes to the applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
general conformity requirements upon promulgation.” |
4.11.3 |
4-130 |
23 |
|
|
“surface temperature has increased 0.74 ± 0.18C° (1.33 ± 0.32F°) during the last |
|
|
|
|
|
100 years,” should read “surface temperature has increased 0.74 ± 0.18°C |
|
|
|
|
|
(1.33 ± 0.32°F) during the last 100 years,” |
4.13.2 |
4-140 |
22 |
|
|
“church), the criteria range from 72 to 80 VdB and from 75 to 83 VdB, respective, |
|
|
|
|
|
depending on” should read “church), the criteria range from 72 to 80 VdB and from |
|
|
|
|
|
75 to 83 VdB, respectively, depending on” |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 This page intentionally left blank.
14
Final Solar PEIS |
4-48 |
July 2012 |
1 |
5 UPDATE TO IMPACTS OF SOLAR ENERGY DEVELOPMENT |
2 |
AND POTENTIAL MITIGATION MEASURES |
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
5.1 INTRODUCTION |
6 |
|
7 |
Chapter 5 of the Draft Solar PEIS (BLM and DOE 2010) discussed potential positive and |
8negative environmental, social, and economic impacts of utility-scale solar energy development.
9The assessment considered both direct and indirect impacts. The impact assessment was
10discussed in terms of common impacts (impacts that occur for all types of solar energy facilities)
11and for technology-specific impacts. The types of solar technologies evaluated included those
12considered to be most likely to be developed at the utility scale during the 20-year study period
13evaluated in this PEIS, considering technological and economic limitations (i.e., parabolic
14trough, power tower, dish engine, and PV technologies). In this Final Solar PEIS, information on
15the impacts of solar energy development that has become available subsequent to publication of
16the Draft Solar PEIS is presented in this section. In addition, corrections to incorrect information
17on the impacts of solar energy development and potential mitigation measures in the Draft Solar
18PEIS are provided via the errata table in Section 5.23.
19
20For each resource, potential mitigation measures that could be used to avoid, minimize
21and/or mitigate impacts from solar energy development were identified in the Draft Solar PEIS.
22The potential mitigation measures described in Sections 5.2 through 5.21 of the Draft Solar PEIS
23were further evaluated by the BLM to identify those appropriate for adoption as required design
24features for inclusion in BLM’s Solar Energy Program. The BLM’s proposed final list of
25required design features is included in Section A.2.2 of Appendix A of this Final Solar PEIS.
26Changes to the mitigation measures presented in the Draft Solar PEIS (made in response to
27comments and with additional analysis as needed) are not presented in this Section 5 update;
28rather, all appropriate changes have been made to the required design features that are presented
29in Section A.2.2 of Appendix A.
30
31Chapter 5 of the Draft Solar PEIS also discussed potential impacts from the construction
32and operation of new transmission lines. The impacts were described generically, without
33assumptions on the length of the new transmission lines or new roadways that would be required
34for solar energy facilities. Land disturbance impacts from transmission line upgrades were
35assumed to be similar to those from new transmission line construction (this could be the case if
36it is a large upgrade; for example, from a 69-kV line to a 230-kV or larger line). In this Final
37Solar PEIS, new information on the impacts of transmission line construction and operation is
38presented where available.
39
40
41 5.2 LANDS AND REALTY
42
43Utility-scale solar energy facilities would affect lands and realty uses and activities on
44and near BLM-administered public lands. The average solar energy facilities considered in this
45Final Solar PEIS are large (e.g., up to several thousand acres), and they will exclude most other
46surface uses of the land. Additional issues include the creation of an industrial landscape in stark
Final Solar PEIS |
5-1 |
July 2012 |
1 contrast to surrounding undeveloped lands that would likely have an adverse impact on the 2 recreational, wilderness, and visual quality of those undeveloped lands such as historic trails,
3Native American sacred sites, traditional cultural properties, and traditional use areas;
4development of additional transmission lines; fragmentation of large blocks of public land,
5which will affect existing access routes; development of public lands that may induce
6 |
development of adjacent or nearby state or private lands; impacts on land values (both positive |
7 |
and negative); and increased vehicle traffic. |
8 |
|
9 |
Information provided in the Draft Solar PEIS remains valid, with the following update: |
10 |
|
11 |
• The total area disturbed for solar energy projects is quite variable, and while |
12 |
the average size of projects as presented in Section 3.5 of the Draft Solar PEIS |
13 |
is generally accurate, the maximum size of utility-scale solar energy projects |
14 |
is not yet known. As of late 2011, the largest approved project on BLM- |
15 |
administered land, the Solar Millennium Blythe project (which was approved |
16 |
as a 1,000-MW solar trough facility but for which a post-authorization request |
17 |
has been received to change the technology to PV) was estimated to disturb |
18 |
about 7,030 acres (28.5 km2), which includes the final transmission line route, |
19 |
temporary construction areas for the transmission line, and disturbance for a |
20 |
telecommunication line. |
21 |
|
22 |
|
235.3 SPECIALLY DESIGNATED AREAS AND LANDS WITH WILDERNESS
24CHARACTERISTICS
25
26The BLM has excluded many specially designated areas with sensitive resources from
27application for solar development, and these areas would not incur direct impacts from solar
28energy development; however, these areas may incur indirect impacts from solar energy
29development on BLM-administered lands adjacent to and/or within the viewshed of the excluded
30areas. These impacts could include adverse visual effects on the viewshed of these areas
31(including impacts on the night sky viewing), adverse impacts on wilderness characteristics,
32reduced recreational use, fragmentation of biologically linked areas, and loss of public access.
33Specially designated areas managed by other federal agencies and state and local governments
34would also be subject to indirect impacts.
35
36A category of lands available for application for solar energy development is land that
37has been recognized by the BLM as possessing wilderness characteristics, but which has not
38been identified as a WSA and for which planning decisions have not been made to protect those
39wilderness characteristics. Utility-scale solar energy development activities and the development
40of associated transmission facilities, within, adjacent to, or near these areas likely would
41adversely affect or eliminate the wilderness characteristics in all or portions of these areas
42depending on siteand project-specific conditions.
43
44 Information provided in the Draft Solar PEIS remain valid, with the following updates: 45
Final Solar PEIS |
5-2 |
July 2012 |
